In the view at the micro level, the weapons that Chinese soldiers used were no match to what Japanese soldiers used. According to the source that I read, most of the Chinese soldiers were still using muzzleloader that a soldier needed to pour powder through the muzzle end, used a ram-rod to force a ball or bullet into the barrel through the muzzle end, pulled the hammer back, put a primer cap on it, and then fired. This not only took a long time. The worst part was that the soldier had to stand up in the battle field to do all these if there was no cover -- this was an act of suicide. You could find some Japanese movie about that war, and saw Japanese soldiers shooting from a prone position very close the ground, on the other hand, the Chinese soldiers were lined up like in a parade ground, and had to slowly reload the muskets or rifles. No wonder they lost the battle and the war. The same thing also happened in Europe when Prussian army used their needle gun to defeat Austrian who were still using muzzle-loading rifles in 1866. In the view at the micro level, we also saw the same thing in naval force. The fact that Qing government refused to purchase quick-firing naval guns and the subsequent lack of money to buy explosive shells pretty much sealed the fate of the Chinese naval force. But the view from the macro level is much more useful. And can explain a lot what went wrong in the micro level. Chinese government didn't have a unified leadership. The Qing ruling class was on guard against the Han military generals. And the Han generals knew that they were not trusted, and would not push hard to ask for reform. Without a central leadership, everything was done in piece meal and half heartedly.
@@zavod.fiftyseven 照理来说center fire 的步枪应该是没问题的，但是老家伙们撞针的材料不比现在，又放了这么个百八十年，跟现代的肯定没法比。而且也得分，比如德国和瑞典的毛瑟甚至莫辛纳甘都没听说过断的，老李和友坂这类cock on close又不能缓慢释放击针的断的例子就很多。但是老李的好找，日本货就不太好找，甚至三八式还分前期后期，他们的bolt body以及撞针的细节是不一样的，还不能通用。。。
槍身編號延續，這如同台灣的T65,T65K1, T65K2都是延續槍號，沒有單獨編號，除了T65的外銷版是單獨編號，這款外銷版據說也有對台部隊有少量留入
這把槍在台灣日據時期的時候是專門借給原住民打獵用，
而日本警察和士兵則是使用當時最先進三八式步槍，
算是把淘汰的武器再利用的政策，
但是日本政府只給原住民五發子彈和十天的打獵時間而已⋯
「賽德克巴萊」霧社事件中不少原住民也是用這把槍抗日，
第一集最後有一幕，
有一位原住民在開槍時用手指夾住子彈快速裝彈的那把就是村田步槍⋯
感谢补充
11mm口徑狩獵非常夠用了，現今政府默許原住民自製的獵槍大多也是11mm，只是裝彈要從槍口裝.....
@@umasnangavulan1649 我知道，
我陪過原住民朋友去打獵，
還蠻有趣的，
獵物一起扛回部落，
然後大家一起殺肉
@@umasnangavulan1649傳聞有神奇的通道可以拿到制式的霰彈😂
這個原住民就叫它MURATA，拿給原住民用的不是原本那個軍隊配的村田銃。是村田銃退役後的改版「村田式猟銃」 打的是狩獵用的霰彈。 最大外觀區別是槍管，「村田式猟銃」的槍管特別長。
這個版本日本本地也有，到現在還能買到。 有興趣可以搜索「村田式猟銃」。
啥都不说了，大写的“服” ❤💯👊
恭喜发财，点赞👍五七工厂🇨🇳
加油 也希望解说 军服 海军
17:20 矮小的士兵边上跟甘蔗似的的长枪是什么？短的弹仓有孔是漏夹枪，长的不会是二人抬吧？长度和边上城门比感觉像是抬枪
催更
甲午胜利了，又怎样？还有皇帝
17:05 最后一句果然经典，不只是大清没有真正定论，知道今天都没有定论，或者说社会从上到下并没有一个比较共同的观点，如果单从这一点看，中国想要实现真正的进步，还需要很多很多的时间呐
In the view at the micro level, the weapons that Chinese soldiers used were no match to what Japanese soldiers used. According to the source that I read, most of the Chinese soldiers were still using muzzleloader that a soldier needed to pour powder through the muzzle end, used a ram-rod to force a ball or bullet into the barrel through the muzzle end, pulled the hammer back, put a primer cap on it, and then fired. This not only took a long time. The worst part was that the soldier had to stand up in the battle field to do all these if there was no cover -- this was an act of suicide. You could find some Japanese movie about that war, and saw Japanese soldiers shooting from a prone position very close the ground, on the other hand, the Chinese soldiers were lined up like in a parade ground, and had to slowly reload the muskets or rifles. No wonder they lost the battle and the war. The same thing also happened in Europe when Prussian army used their needle gun to defeat Austrian who were still using muzzle-loading rifles in 1866.
In the view at the micro level, we also saw the same thing in naval force. The fact that Qing government refused to purchase quick-firing naval guns and the subsequent lack of money to buy explosive shells pretty much sealed the fate of the Chinese naval force.
But the view from the macro level is much more useful. And can explain a lot what went wrong in the micro level. Chinese government didn't have a unified leadership. The Qing ruling class was on guard against the Han military generals. And the Han generals knew that they were not trusted, and would not push hard to ask for reform. Without a central leadership, everything was done in piece meal and half heartedly.
老哥竟然弄得到這把!
来啦！支持支持
楼主的手套破了……
最后的歌是元寇吧
是
第一次听到这个歌还是啊海军里面
大佬，想请问下这种包纸的裸铅弹头，在实际使用中膛线挂铅的状况怎么样？历史上有文献记载吗？
这个我也不清楚。期待大神解答
主要还是上下思想不统一吧，满清高层对汉人地主发展起来的武装都限制得厉害
体制烂，军制烂，后勤烂，指挥烂，部队烂，总之打仗双方不是一个纬度，碰到这么烂的一个对手，如果我也要狠狠敲一笔，否则天理难容。。。
地板
他来了，来了，终于来了
大哥，您不放dummy round老枪dry fire不怕撞针折断吗？而且日本枪貌似特别爱断，我的三八卡宾就断了，想找个spare的都找不到😂
那我得注意一下。以前只听说南部14式特别容易断
@@zavod.fiftyseven 照理来说center fire 的步枪应该是没问题的，但是老家伙们撞针的材料不比现在，又放了这么个百八十年，跟现代的肯定没法比。而且也得分，比如德国和瑞典的毛瑟甚至莫辛纳甘都没听说过断的，老李和友坂这类cock on close又不能缓慢释放击针的断的例子就很多。但是老李的好找，日本货就不太好找，甚至三八式还分前期后期，他们的bolt body以及撞针的细节是不一样的，还不能通用。。。
我打赌下一次要介绍的肯定是38大盖了😂
是。中间也没什么枪了
😄🐰
拆枪的时候零件有没有掉到阳台下面去过？😀
拿磁铁去找。。。
前段时间入了把十八式 满身汉字看得热泪盈眶
学生打老师
沙发