I like how you show at 4:24 that the upper end of the *central sulcus* extends a short distance onto the medial surface, that's very helpful! (Narration for central sulcus starts at 3:54)
Not too bad, thank you for providing this, and probably more useful than my following comments might suggest. Seeing an actual human brain is very important for learning the surface anatomy, models can only do so much, and do not always show what's really there. Could use a *better* anatomical brain, this one is falling apart somewhat, but I understand that you deal with what you can get, so thank you again. The auto-generated CC are much better than most, at first I thought they were *actual* CC expressing exactly what's being said, until I got to the 'flux cerebri' (falx cerbri). and the 'large internal fissure' (longitudinal fissure), and I'm not sure what the 'ten dorial' surface is (tentorial surface?). This just goes to show that for at least some people (me), since the vocabulary relating to the brain is so specific and important, *actual* CC are really a necessity, auto-generated are not sufficient.
At 3:25, the lobes of the cerebrum, your pointing is out of sync with your naming of the lobes. You are pointing at the temporal lobe when you say 'frontal', touching the frontal lobe while saying 'parietal', pointing to the parietal when saying 'occipital', and pointing (at first) to the occipital while saying 'temporal'. This can be confusing, so I'd suggest that you pin an correction about this.
Skip to 6.55 directly for sulci and gyri✌
6:55
4:37 - *Lateral sulcus* (most easily recognized sulcus)
4:21 - *central sulcus*
5:06 - *parieto-occipital sulcus* (on medial surface)
The most helpful video about external surface of cerebral hampshir
I like how you show at 4:24 that the upper end of the *central sulcus* extends a short distance onto the medial surface, that's very helpful! (Narration for central sulcus starts at 3:54)
It was very good ....
Nice explained .....
It helps me a lot in my exam ...
thanks ma'am ....
Super helpful! Thank you! 😊
Not too bad, thank you for providing this, and probably more useful than my following comments might suggest. Seeing an actual human brain is very important for learning the surface anatomy, models can only do so much, and do not always show what's really there. Could use a *better* anatomical brain, this one is falling apart somewhat, but I understand that you deal with what you can get, so thank you again. The auto-generated CC are much better than most, at first I thought they were *actual* CC expressing exactly what's being said, until I got to the 'flux cerebri' (falx cerbri). and the 'large internal fissure' (longitudinal fissure), and I'm not sure what the 'ten dorial' surface is (tentorial surface?). This just goes to show that for at least some people (me), since the vocabulary relating to the brain is so specific and important, *actual* CC are really a necessity, auto-generated are not sufficient.
Great video
v good video madam. v elaborately narrated from students point of view. i fwdd to my students
At 3:25, the lobes of the cerebrum, your pointing is out of sync with your naming of the lobes. You are pointing at the temporal lobe when you say 'frontal', touching the frontal lobe while saying 'parietal', pointing to the parietal when saying 'occipital', and pointing (at first) to the occipital while saying 'temporal'. This can be confusing, so I'd suggest that you pin an correction about this.
I was going to say something was way off
😊😊thnku mam for lovely explanation
I think at 10:47 you meant " Lunate Sulcus separate these gyri from the OCCIPITAL POLE " but said occipital lobe ma'am.
Very important topic
Thank you so much ma'am.... Amazing video
Thank You
is supra splenial sulcus and sub parietal sulcus same??
Thank u so much Maam❤
Thank you Mam... very well explained👍
It was helpful mam
All the topic collected from BD churasia
Thank you mam
Pars orbitalis, triangularis and opercularis
1:10 serparated by falx cerebri
meh
Neku vaste own ga chepu chaurasia lo chusi dito chepav cha worst explanation I have seen