tinySA settings impacting scanning speed

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @hamradio3716
    @hamradio3716 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow! So many nice options. These videos are excellent. 10/10

  • @9jonisi9
    @9jonisi9 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you 😊

  • @technophil7560
    @technophil7560 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the continuous informations

  • @johnwoods8309
    @johnwoods8309 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for another great tutorial erik

  • @mevmevmev
    @mevmevmev 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why does the RBW filter have an inverted peak/ flat-top when you are zoomed in to a peak? Is this a limitation or something the can be adjusted/calibrated?
    Also, in the case of a wide RBW is true peak the actual highest point (both sides of the RBW filter, or the middle which appears lower.
    Amazing device for the features and cost.

    • @ErikKaashoek
      @ErikKaashoek  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The RBW filter shape is due to a fixed DSP algorithm inside the RF IC. Can not be changed. The measured value is where the signal fits in the filter so some uncertainty for wide RBW

  • @scollyer.tuition
    @scollyer.tuition 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know essentially nothing about RF techniques, and I was wondering what are the practical limitations of the TinySA's RBW of 2.6 kHz?
    Which applications are absolutely ruled out for the TinySA by this minimum RBW size? I guess looking at the details of certain kinds of modulation, but apart from that, I'm too clueless to know.
    Or to put it another way: what *could* I do with one of the low-end Rigol or Siglent SAs (with RBW down to 10 Hz) that I *can't* do with the TinySA.

    • @ErikKaashoek
      @ErikKaashoek  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed, looking at certain kinds of modulation, and a low RBW may help to extract a signal from the noise. But given the difference in price, even second hand, why not start with a tinySA and if needed you can always buy a much more expensive Rigol or Siglent.

    • @scollyer.tuition
      @scollyer.tuition 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ErikKaashoek Eric, thanks for the rapid response.
      Yes, I had forgotten about the obvious SNR improvements due to smaller RBW - good point.
      I indeed intend to buy a tinySA (I note the lower case T :-) as I have an upcoming project where I think I will have to worry about EMI problems - something new for me - so I will need something to give me an idea of the problem - the tinySA will be fine for this, I think.
      And yes, I am going to use the tinySA as a device where I can learn some RF techniques - it's from that point of view that I'm wondering what I shouldn't expect to be able to do.
      By the way, are there any plans for hardware upgrades in the future, or is the current design pretty much final?

  • @WendyWay-g1o
    @WendyWay-g1o ปีที่แล้ว

    1000 / 580 is not 7.2 so I'm confused.

  • @ahmetozdemir7173
    @ahmetozdemir7173 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the last version?

    • @ErikKaashoek
      @ErikKaashoek  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      See wiki: tinySA.org/wiki