Thanks for this video, Vahid. It'd also be very interesting if you could report on a study within applied linguistics that uses Rasch and the results can be interpreted.
thank you. For some examples, please see here: th-cam.com/video/JVIa8jszCDQ/w-d-xo.html For a comprehensive review of the application of Rasch measurement in applied linguistics, see this paper: journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0265532220927487?journalCode=ltja
Hello! I a have been trying to look for data that I can practice on using R. Would you mind giving suggestions on where I can find one? I hope to understand the Statistical theory on Rasch Model because I am considering on incorporating it with imputation techniques.
For the male-female difference (25:40), can you explain why the middle items (bounded by the male and female measure's averages) are the one by which the two groups differ? My intuitive understanding is that the middle part is the items where males' and females' measures overlap the most.
Our free and open-source cloud-based software handles dichotomous, partial credit, and mixed format scoring. It performs unidimensional Rasch, many-facets, fixed anchor equating, ANOVA and t-tests for ability estimates, and inter-rater reliability tests. Feel free to check out our free cloud-based software here: autopsych.shinyapps.io/version_1_0_0/ with exposition in journal here: journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0257682
Our software provides comprehensive methodological expositions in each report. Our free and open-source cloud-based software handles dichotomous, partial credit, and mixed format scoring. It performs unidimensional Rasch, many-facets, fixed anchor equating, ANOVA and t-tests for ability estimates, and inter-rater reliability tests. Feel free to check out our free cloud-based software here: autopsych.shinyapps.io/version_1_0_0/ with exposition in journal here: journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0257682
Too much advocacy for employing Rasch, without explaining what it is. Didn't get to the guts of the matter until 1/3 of the video was completed. Frustrating to watch.
Sorry to hear that. I am not sure if it helps, but in the following video list, you can find 13 videos on how to do Rasch analysis and interpret the output, and use the output in validation research: th-cam.com/video/JVIa8jszCDQ/w-d-xo.html
It was an introduction for beginners. I thought it was very clear, pitched well for its intended audience. He's, a great presenter, especially in this video. Rasch thinking. This idea is really interesting. I'd like to hear more about this. A framework?? Finally, his intro has given me confidence. I don't have a PhD, but an inquisitive mind, and found fun in maths perhaps far too late in life. But Dr. B, makes a refreshing case for getting on and applying Rasch anyway.
9:30 explanation starts
thanks
I would have to enter a US university to listen to a lecture like this, but today I had it for free. Thank you !
My professor Dr.Boone!! He just published his new book, yeah!!
Thank you Dr. Boone!!
Awesome Channel, thanks for putting such a content here....
So fascinating that Rasch's technique doesn't need being graduate student of statics . So applicable it is.
Very helpful. But do you have explanation for dichotomous responses like Yes/No to test validity of a Problem Checklist?
Thanks for this video, Vahid. It'd also be very interesting if you could report on a study within applied linguistics that uses Rasch and the results can be interpreted.
thank you. For some examples, please see here: th-cam.com/video/JVIa8jszCDQ/w-d-xo.html
For a comprehensive review of the application of Rasch measurement in applied linguistics, see this paper:
journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0265532220927487?journalCode=ltja
Hello! I a have been trying to look for data that I can practice on using R. Would you mind giving suggestions on where I can find one? I hope to understand the Statistical theory on Rasch Model because I am considering on incorporating it with imputation techniques.
@@VahidAryadoust Seems like I missed this by a few years. But it is never too late to thank you.
thank you good work
Thank you very much !
Thank you.
I wonder if there are disadvantages of using rasch analysis compared to the classic test theory?
For the male-female difference (25:40), can you explain why the middle items (bounded by the male and female measure's averages) are the one by which the two groups differ? My intuitive understanding is that the middle part is the items where males' and females' measures overlap the most.
I suggest you consider conducting differential item functioning analysis if you wish to look into the male-female differences.
Thank you so much
Our free and open-source cloud-based software handles dichotomous, partial credit, and mixed format scoring. It performs unidimensional Rasch, many-facets, fixed anchor equating, ANOVA and t-tests for ability estimates, and inter-rater reliability tests. Feel free to check out our free cloud-based software here: autopsych.shinyapps.io/version_1_0_0/ with exposition in journal here: journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0257682
Where can I get the boook
Here:
www.springer.com/gp/book/9789400768567
Our software provides comprehensive methodological expositions in each report. Our free and open-source cloud-based software handles dichotomous, partial credit, and mixed format scoring. It performs unidimensional Rasch, many-facets, fixed anchor equating, ANOVA and t-tests for ability estimates, and inter-rater reliability tests. Feel free to check out our free cloud-based software here: autopsych.shinyapps.io/version_1_0_0/ with exposition in journal here: journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0257682
Too much advocacy for employing Rasch, without explaining what it is. Didn't get to the guts of the matter until 1/3 of the video was completed. Frustrating to watch.
Sorry to hear that. I am not sure if it helps, but in the following video list, you can find 13 videos on how to do Rasch analysis and interpret the output, and use the output in validation research:
th-cam.com/video/JVIa8jszCDQ/w-d-xo.html
It was an introduction for beginners. I thought it was very clear, pitched well for its intended audience.
He's, a great presenter, especially in this video.
Rasch thinking. This idea is really interesting. I'd like to hear more about this. A framework??
Finally, his intro has given me confidence. I don't have a PhD, but an inquisitive mind, and found fun in maths perhaps far too late in life. But Dr. B, makes a refreshing case for getting on and applying Rasch anyway.
@@VahidAryadoust THANK YOU!!!!!!
It was a well done video that accomplished its intended purpose for its intended audience.