No it is not absolute because does not include social boycott of a few individuals or their exclusion from religious services. Refer to judicial interpretation of Article 17
@OPSCAdda247 Sir, mu multiple case judgement dekhili SC ra , kouta b eya kahuni j Art.17 is not absolute. Apananku jadi samay haba please verify karibe.
@@debarpitchandan2026Chandan thumbs up for your curiosity But in no case SC has said that Article 17 is not absolute Look at the following In Jai Singh v. Union of IndiaRajasthan High Court and in Devrajiah v. B. Padmana of Madras High Court, the court defined the word untouchability.The court said that ‘The subject matter of Article 17 is not untouchable in its literal or grammatical sense but the ‘practice as it had developed historically in the country’. It refers to the social disabilities imposed on certain classes of persons because of their birth in certain castes. Hence, it does not cover the social boycott of a few individuals or their exclusion from religious services,
One of my favrt educator For economy JATADHARI sir 🙏
Sir annual financial statement present on both the house of parliament
Yes but first presented before the Lok Sabha
Kendrapara
Kendrapada
Namaskar S.K Sir,Article 17- abolition of untouchability is the only absolute right/article in our constitution.
No it is not absolute because does not include social boycott of a few individuals or their exclusion from religious services. Refer to judicial interpretation of Article 17
@OPSCAdda247 Sir, mu multiple case judgement dekhili SC ra , kouta b eya kahuni j Art.17 is not absolute. Apananku jadi samay haba please verify karibe.
@@debarpitchandan2026Chandan thumbs up for your curiosity
But in no case SC has said that Article 17 is not absolute
Look at the following
In Jai Singh v. Union of IndiaRajasthan High Court and in Devrajiah v. B. Padmana of Madras High Court, the court defined the word untouchability.The court said that ‘The subject matter of Article 17 is not untouchable in its literal or grammatical sense but the ‘practice as it had developed historically in the country’. It refers to the social disabilities imposed on certain classes of persons because of their birth in certain castes. Hence, it does not cover the social boycott of a few individuals or their exclusion from religious services,
Sir 1hour 43 min, according to me the second option is not correct.
Sir pdf plz
Kendrapara
Kendrapada