ความคิดเห็น •

  • @PercivalGreyrat
    @PercivalGreyrat 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    But, can they run crysis?

    • @Sebastianmaz615
      @Sebastianmaz615 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Funny. I just read an article about how when it came out most ppls computers couldn't handle it.

  • @jb9282
    @jb9282 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Is it possible to design/ simulate more faster computer using this supercomputer ? 😀

    • @serenamente5192
      @serenamente5192 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don't need to design/simulate them... Tachyum's Prodigy is coming late 2021 and will make these "supercomputers" look like toys.

  • @holyravioli5795
    @holyravioli5795 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So why not just make the CPU's bigger if you can't make the transistors smaller?

  • @Jackieception
    @Jackieception 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    they gonna use it to design a yottaflop pc which ultimately will give birth to AGI the ultimate form of AI

  • @wordontheblock
    @wordontheblock 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    How much frames do you think I’ll get gaming on this?

    • @bryanbale
      @bryanbale 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Lmao the entire time i was just wondering how many frames on siege I’ll get

    • @crowntotheundergroud
      @crowntotheundergroud 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      honestly. 1000 fps at a resolution of about 500 mega pixels is what we're able to process. Probably more than that since our brain doesn't allocate all of its resources to sight.

    • @harshalislive8030
      @harshalislive8030 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      this is supercomputer used for to know global climate and national security and you are thinking to play games on it 😂. It will be insult of it.

  • @emomuzz5883
    @emomuzz5883 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Imagine, a day in the future where people look back at FRONTIER with the kind of quaint admiration we have for UNIVAC... what will THEY be running?

    • @serenamente5192
      @serenamente5192 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tachyum prodigy architecture. You only need 4 Tachyum Prodigy racks to get to a tensor exaflop. The future is late 2021.

    • @Sebastianmaz615
      @Sebastianmaz615 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's exactly the type of things I'd love to see/know. Like a pair of glasses that can do everything one can think of; internet, VR, gaming, with virtual controls for hands only seen/usable when looking through the pair of glasses on one's face. Idk. But your point being what on earth will we be using 150 yrs from now that will make today's tech look lame? Amazing just thinking about it. 😊👍🏻

    • @mikewade1604
      @mikewade1604 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Crisis on a napkin

  • @jmalmsten
    @jmalmsten 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    So... Can it compute the ultimate question about Life, the Universe and Everything?
    - Question courtesy of Amalgamated Union of Philosophers, Sages, Luminaries and Other Thinking Persons ( aka AUPSLOTP for short)

    • @shadoweagle7629
      @shadoweagle7629 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No it cannot maybe in 10 or 20 years it will be close

    • @bryanbale
      @bryanbale 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      jmalmsten my computer is telling me 42

  • @malcolmwolter4825
    @malcolmwolter4825 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whoa, very cool!

  • @merlepatterson
    @merlepatterson 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    "What is Exascale Computing?" It's a system that can find the Wall St crooks in a millisecond but isn't tasked to do so for some reason?

    • @maxcap60
      @maxcap60 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      there is no money in it.

    • @merlepatterson
      @merlepatterson 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@maxcap60 Or, there's very good money in it on the front end via the lobby industry? An enticement to look everywhere else but the obvious first.

    • @maxcap60
      @maxcap60 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Merle Patterson Wall Street uses AI computing to beat others on changes in stock prices. Is that why they care?

    • @merlepatterson
      @merlepatterson 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@maxcap60 I have no idea what they actually care about.

  • @caatabatic
    @caatabatic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    MAndatory: but will it run crysis?

    • @jameslogan410
      @jameslogan410 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No nothing can run crysis

  • @jayebirdjb7143
    @jayebirdjb7143 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the DWAVE?

  • @ConmanRajat
    @ConmanRajat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And I can't even assemble one home desktop by myself

  • @michaelolthof2347
    @michaelolthof2347 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    everything and including everything=complete... 40 times per page 10^94 volumes.

  • @adonistopofmen2571
    @adonistopofmen2571 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great supercomputers ...

  • @jensharbers5620
    @jensharbers5620 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does it run Minecraft?

    • @iassessyou3285
      @iassessyou3285 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The oldest, most dull joke. Of course it can. You fucking clown.

  • @deeddude
    @deeddude 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about D-Wave's 5000 qubit system 'Advantage'?.. Is that not even more powerful than this?...

    • @serenamente5192
      @serenamente5192 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      D-Wave builds quantum computers. Quantum computers are better for some tasks, and classical computers are better for others. It's like comparing apple to oranges.

  • @justice929
    @justice929 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Japan's super computer 450 petaflops is now number 1

  • @xantochroi
    @xantochroi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    we have a 3.6 exa flops machine running now . folding proteins for covid research.

    • @Sebastianmaz615
      @Sebastianmaz615 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think you're probably telling the truth.

    • @serenamente5192
      @serenamente5192 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@caedenw Yes we do, it's called fold@home. Not a single machine though

  • @l.light_9
    @l.light_9 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ❤️

  • @Sebastianmaz615
    @Sebastianmaz615 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wonder if quantum computing will make exascale extinct? If so, when?

    • @serenamente5192
      @serenamente5192 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Quantum computers are better for some tasks, and classical computers are better for others. It's like comparing apple to oranges.

    • @justice929
      @justice929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No, classical computers will work along side quantum computers

    • @synexiasaturnds727yearsago7
      @synexiasaturnds727yearsago7 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@justice929 And that's how it should be IMO.

    • @zachflannery6750
      @zachflannery6750 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They will be connected to eachother in 2025 they will be connecting standard supercomputers with quantum computers and AI to all work together to make an even bigger system

  • @oliveirarock1955
    @oliveirarock1955 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Exascale! Omg!

  • @aaronhenderson5588
    @aaronhenderson5588 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tho never faster than THOUGHT of a just the HUMBLE

  • @golagaz
    @golagaz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Jesus.

  • @johneygd
    @johneygd 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whoooaaah, such axaflop supercomputer could match the performance of a human brain,now just imagine having such powerful supercomputer in your basement doing all dirty work, such as magically turning all your vhs tapes into 4K content, turn B&W content into color, source saperate mono music into dolby surroundand turn 2D imagines into true 3Dimensional images supported 3D hologramic tv’s,all in realtime ,now that would be absolutely mind blowing,phew.

    • @evanv602
      @evanv602 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@caedenw it would be a time saver and a hell of a lot easier

  • @nebuladus7850
    @nebuladus7850 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey🛸

  • @circusitch
    @circusitch 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They could refilm Tron in 2 seconds.

  • @notsocleverley
    @notsocleverley 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are these the computers that become self aware and wipe out humanity?

    • @notsocleverley
      @notsocleverley 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Zeuswashington Lol, perhaps you're right. Maybe we need something to save us from ourselves!

  • @qzh00k
    @qzh00k 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    All so we can make better nuclear weapons, more nuclear weapons.
    Ignore the waste problem and mining pollution and ungodly profits. All good

    • @zico9013
      @zico9013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are Right! That‘s Sick. Hundreds of Millions of Dollars and the No. 1 aim is to simulate Weapons of Mass Destruction - euphemistically called National Security.

  • @tonydanis1480
    @tonydanis1480 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All these video, publications from LLN and other government labs are just pure glossy Madison Avenue ads, they tell you virtually nothing but are slick, colorful and have a sexy woman's voice in the background.
    This isn't what science is about.