Flite Test - Proper RX Placement - FLITE TIP

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 108

  • @ExperimentalAirlines
    @ExperimentalAirlines 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One of your best yet. It's a very mysterious concept and very valuable for us to learn. Not the hard way, by losing control link and crashing.

  • @michelbarbe7305
    @michelbarbe7305 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You guys crack me up! Great videos with a lot of contents and a lot of humor! Keep up the good work!

  • @Nitroangel12
    @Nitroangel12 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best RC show on youtube so far for me! Thanks!

  • @timatworksg
    @timatworksg 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best RC flying show by far! Great editing, cinematography, set up and the banter between both Josh and Josh is awesome. They make a great duo! Like it when they both switch between being smart and then not...lol! With 2 great sponsors where everything mentioned here can be found by anyone...the whole concept, reason, and making it all done down to earth instead of being technical and parts specific make this great for the Hobby! Keep up the great work FliteTest! Highly recommended I am assured!

  • @sootydave1
    @sootydave1 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow. OK guy's you got it perfectly correct. As a Extra class Radio Amateur, I have never heard Such a good description of EMF, ( electric Magnetic Field ). Keep up the good work, and lets see a flying Doughnut....

  • @drcuffe
    @drcuffe 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Carbon is conductive! its what resistors are made out of. It will block signals and carry current but also change the signals. We were welding suspension components on a Carbonfibre mono race car once and they didnt move the TIG earth lead and it still carried the current through the carbon chassis and still welded lol. Thats why nose cones in planes and rockets etc are made from glass fibre so it doesnt block, RF/radar/GPS etc

  • @JoshuaMello
    @JoshuaMello 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    You guys are awesome! Keep the videos coming!

  • @jezrougan
    @jezrougan 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    You guys have put out another cracking show, top notch, keep up the doughnuts lol

  • @devilsfork100
    @devilsfork100 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANKS FOR THIS! I have looked everywhere on the net to find info!

  • @PHeMoX
    @PHeMoX 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @2009PatrickWhite Not quite. There are plenty of receivers that already have two antennas at opposing angles in one receiver unit to optimalize reception itself, but the real problem generally is the radio system itself and it's vulnerability to a weak signal.
    If it needs a satellite, it's usually not very good. What they do not mention is that radio signals should be looked at as wave forms, ripples. This means that the blind spot will only affect the plane at extremely close or far range.

  • @ehandford
    @ehandford 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey. KV stand for revolutions per volt. so a 2200kv will spin faster but wont be able to spin a big propeller. So for slow aeroplanes have a lower kv (750kv) spinning a larger propeller as this will produce better thrust. Always read what size propeller a motor can take. But fast = 2200kv low = 750kv , more torque (intial push) with a lower KV. It is more efficent to have a big slow propeller than a tiny fast one.
    An average kv is around 1200kv

  • @joshrichards5440
    @joshrichards5440 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I dig the Toby Mac reference!

  • @JensSchilstra
    @JensSchilstra 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the intro.... my headphone blowed up....

  • @icewolfy1
    @icewolfy1 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    That donut looks tasty. You should eat one every show and some donut shop will definitely sponsor the show! ;)

  • @visard78
    @visard78 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great episode (as ever)

  • @TuckerGott
    @TuckerGott 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ...as the Futaba guys laugh.
    A Spektrum/JR Guy.

    • @krotchlickmeugh627
      @krotchlickmeugh627 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And still futaba reigns supreme.
      Well except radio master.

  • @28th_St_Air
    @28th_St_Air 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    You guys are awesome. Thank you.

  • @jjlanda1171
    @jjlanda1171 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi guys, nice video very helpful could you tell me where can I buy one plane like this P-47? It's beautiful

  • @TeamAstroworkz
    @TeamAstroworkz 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    you guys kill me :) Don't feed Joshua sugar ... he's already hyper!

    • @rtoebak76
      @rtoebak76 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I did not even read the comments. 😄😁

  • @cup_and_cone
    @cup_and_cone 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @sterby1
    It's been done. Circular discs fly surprisingly well... look up the Nemeth Umbrella, Flying Flapjack, Sack AS.6, or Avrocar.

  • @jmcguire5151
    @jmcguire5151 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sorry I'm late to the party, but if you're using multiple satellite receivers how do you plug all of them into the main receiver? I've been out if the sport awhile (27ghz and 72ghz days) and this is all new to me.

  • @ChiliConCarnage
    @ChiliConCarnage 9 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I love you guys, and the work you do. (But please learn the difference between "well" and "good".) :D Looking forward to more (grammatically correct) videos. :)
    Love from Norway.

  • @itzjoeylo4501
    @itzjoeylo4501 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you know of a satellite antenna that works with Futaba in 2023? I can’t find one, can you please point me in the right direction. Thanks for the helpful and entertaining content

  • @RCllamadude
    @RCllamadude 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    i agree, a flying donut would PWN!!!!!

  • @MartinGiskegjerde
    @MartinGiskegjerde 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you explain, in quick tip. How an single battery for the receiver, and an single battery for plane works/helps you?

  • @evelasq1
    @evelasq1 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is the satellite needed for the swappables such as the nutball? This year, I am going to be a beginner. I would be more likely to buy the receiver and the radio from spectrum without the satellite. Peace, Flood!

  • @rtoebak76
    @rtoebak76 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm so loving this model. Little Josh better not eat them sugars, or he will be high on it 😀🇳🇱

  • @JoCa1964
    @JoCa1964 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    First in Europe? Thanks! Love your videos.

  • @catamaranman333
    @catamaranman333 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about using carbon fiber in airframes? I've heard that it blocks RF signals terribly. I've also heard of RX that are specially made for carbon gliders.

  • @Nuno.A
    @Nuno.A 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Funy how you can demonstrate a system shortcomings, while trying to make those look good.

  • @astarothgr
    @astarothgr 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is that "diver city" you talk about, Bixler? Cheers!

  • @TheBlackKnob
    @TheBlackKnob 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    edit: that was a great explanation by josh scott hahahaha

  • @paralinq
    @paralinq 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @ladybirdskaterboy Its a german translation etc. I like it, creative.

  • @furrytaco007
    @furrytaco007 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to see a tip video on how to use a BEC

  • @HumboldtRCPlane
    @HumboldtRCPlane 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you think that the wires from the inside of an Ethernet cable could cause interference to the receiver if used as wiring for leds?

  • @2009PatrickWhite
    @2009PatrickWhite 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do all receivers do this? If so, is it the same size "hole" in the receiving area in different brands?

  • @numex106
    @numex106 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    blade 450 3d!!!! you gonna make an episode?

  • @lewandlo
    @lewandlo 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yep I think a flying donut is needed here. Only because it would better explain the diversity of flying heheheh

  • @bugijs123
    @bugijs123 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @jeanorwin you do

  • @timatworksg
    @timatworksg 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @sterby1 time for a FliteTest scratchbuild...hehe!

  • @6roadwarrior9
    @6roadwarrior9 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Couldn't you use ferrite cores if your worried about signal interferences?

  • @joshuadirect
    @joshuadirect 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @MADdrummer971 yes there's lots of money to be made working twelve hours a month as a co-host of a small TH-cam show. That's how I got the nice jacket ;)

  • @Mena142
    @Mena142 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Signal intereference fade = signal multipathing?

  • @RedAce666
    @RedAce666 12 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "You never want your holes to line up"
    *insert dirty joke here* :D

    • @elijahr6261
      @elijahr6261 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe that’s why it’s age restricted.

  • @aesoft2009
    @aesoft2009 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @MADdrummer971 You need to watch more flitetest.

  • @velen966
    @velen966 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey guys. Can you tell me how to place those on a multicopter? Since there are many wires, escs and no space whatsoever.

  • @Savagetoastness
    @Savagetoastness 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @shebotnov sattelie antenna's are for more reliability its not a necessity

  • @AMalas
    @AMalas 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    would placing two satellites each at a wing tip then one going to the tail. would that cover it All? also can you get a 4 km radius with 2.4 or do I have to try to get 72?

  • @MikeSmith-fk1fl
    @MikeSmith-fk1fl 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about these new receivers that have internal antenas?????

  • @aesoft2009
    @aesoft2009 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @ladybirdskaterboy It's the point.

  • @Danimal-3D
    @Danimal-3D 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's rude to talk with your mouth full. :)
    All joking aside, good episode! Could you do something on DragonLink or other TX range extenders?

  • @aesoft2009
    @aesoft2009 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @lolziloveminecraft Turnigy 9X / Eurgle 9X / FlySky 9X same Tx different brands. Excellent.

  • @QuadDoc
    @QuadDoc 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question... What if my receiver is only sending 1.5volts to the servos? It is a flight controller and receiver in one unit. Have you ever heard of this?

  • @booger37391
    @booger37391 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    josh/ letem make it this time! hes skinny/ needs donuts

  • @PHeMoX
    @PHeMoX 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @wippo76: Amen to that bro! Spektrum is bad, even the new DSMX which are still ridiculously vulnerable to brown-outs
    The number one reason not to buy Spektrum radios, even their newer ones, is because it's simply unreliable. My Turnigy 9X does a better job (never lost a signal, 50$), heck even my Esky 2,4ghz 6ch is more reliable (never lost a signal, 30$). Then there's about a dozen equally expensive choices out there that are at least ten times better (Aurora 9, never lost a signal).

  • @Markus.Ziermann
    @Markus.Ziermann 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    What did you do to our reception area? Hahaha ;)

  • @sterby1
    @sterby1 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Vote here if you want to see a flying donut

  • @AdrianSchwizgebel
    @AdrianSchwizgebel 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    one of those Joshes seems to be quite high... ;D

  • @aaron.t438
    @aaron.t438 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    how to mount the turnigy 9x receiver on a plane?the antenna vertically or horizontally or just leave it in the belly of the plane?someone please tell me !!!i really need help to get the maximum range!!

  • @jkajewski1
    @jkajewski1 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    i face my antenna at my plane and i have never glitched or cut out

  • @MSJDesign
    @MSJDesign 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I never knew about the doughnut coverage...now I'm scared to fly

  • @TheBlackKnob
    @TheBlackKnob 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    TBH, i know this will be a lot of work, but when Josh bixler goes off explaining some things, i think you need an animation to visually describe what he's saying.
    I'm still a noob, and sometimes when he starts babbling with the jargon, i get lost... lol

  • @dudeiwantaname
    @dudeiwantaname 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hes talking about the lost city of Atlantis that's what!

  • @gittarpikk
    @gittarpikk 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    with 2.4 comes shorter range as well... That's why FPV'ers want 72

  • @Jetairplane
    @Jetairplane 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Furthermore, 72mhz is tried and true. Enjoy your 2.4 with your brownouts and reciver reboots and i will keep flying.

  • @aaron.t438
    @aaron.t438 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    please someone tell me how to mount my rx with only 1 antenna (the flysky rx)?do i need to mount the antenna 90 degrees?or just leave it horizontal in the plana?

  • @RCllamadude
    @RCllamadude 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    satellite antennas are SO 6 months ago. i mean really, what company other than spektrum still makes a receiver with a satellite?

  • @Rex_Stuph
    @Rex_Stuph 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I believe it was an old wooden ship.

  • @bobflyman
    @bobflyman 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still fly with 35 Mhz and it works well So stick your 2.4 in a dark place ;)

  • @fidelcastration8036
    @fidelcastration8036 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    on my trainer i just cram it in next to the servos lol

  • @iosxbetax
    @iosxbetax 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can´t I just solder an additional wire to my RX? I mean, for my Tricopter V3?

    • @andguent
      @andguent 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Antenna wires should be designed and tuned to a specific length and frequency. If you just add random wire you may actually hurt your reception.

    • @iosxbetax
      @iosxbetax 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      andguent Alright, thanks.

    • @evanbelsky433
      @evanbelsky433 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +iOS Beta Yeah, but youd run the risk of harming your electronics. But feel free to experiment

  • @CerebralDad
    @CerebralDad 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @TheSoxyrocks I always get 1 on my videos and it throws my percentage off :( haha

  • @primozdobersek2581
    @primozdobersek2581 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Start selling donats on your web side :-)

  • @peuty
    @peuty 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hmmmmmmm donuts

  • @monit111
    @monit111 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @flienky lol on your own then

  • @Jetairplane
    @Jetairplane 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is silly, i have been flying 72mhz for 15 years, since these guys were toddlers and have had no issues with it. Now its a routing problem?

  • @JumpingDonut
    @JumpingDonut 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @astarothgr I think they mean diversity.

  • @wippo76
    @wippo76 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    the only RC system in the world you will need sattelites and better reception is Spektrum
    otherwise i would never trust my plane to a spektrum system, heard of to much crashes caused by loosing link
    if you loose reception for one second your plane is more than 6 seconds not in control ....stupid
    i think the new dsmx is better but all the old stuf is not good enough
    thats why I fly corona :)

  • @wippo76
    @wippo76 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    /watch?v=oayR6s3ugFE
    this is not only one person I know 2 friend who has the same experience
    so buy as much sattelites you can find ...fly safe :)

  • @Naamis1
    @Naamis1 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just get a Futaba?

  • @tr4nscend
    @tr4nscend 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ah but I fly with Futaba.. I don't have to worry of this crap :D

  • @RIPcombat
    @RIPcombat 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    just fly HITEC AURORA 9 2.4ghz

  • @flienky
    @flienky 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like if you didnt understand... hehe

  • @nottheguywhocamps
    @nottheguywhocamps 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    lots of holes....

  • @robgodden6736
    @robgodden6736 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sounds like 2.4ghz is alot of trouble and not very reliable . I'll stick with my 36MHZ, super reliable and never a problem. Wouldn't trust 2.4 in my good aircraft, too much of a gamble.

  • @j.b.708
    @j.b.708 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    the word is redundancy.

  • @raygew
    @raygew 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @turdsurfer
    Nightflyyer did just that /watch?v=xRyOXDGgIh8

  • @kirklewis6175
    @kirklewis6175 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    diversity

  • @MrFlyboy1011
    @MrFlyboy1011 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @shebotnov the antenna is not nessesary it will work without

  • @MazdaBass971
    @MazdaBass971 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    The bald guy looks like hes really into rc planes, the other with the cap, gloves, and nice jacket looks like hes in this just for the money.

  • @grey9582
    @grey9582 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    would have watched video couldn't cancel advertising

  • @ladybirdskaterboy
    @ladybirdskaterboy 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    isn't it flight not flite

  • @fluffykittynoodles
    @fluffykittynoodles 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    donuts in a bag? you ohio folks are weird.

  • @drjazzisme
    @drjazzisme 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could not watch all this to the end...you guys are so annoying the way you go on...sorry...

  • @Boot2yourHead
    @Boot2yourHead 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    don't smash your donuts either. got it.

  • @Boot2yourHead
    @Boot2yourHead 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    so i need to buy donuts to fly? man i'm gone to get fat.