1. Inflationary Cosmology: Is Our Universe Part of a Multiverse? Part I

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 มิ.ย. 2014
  • MIT 8.286 The Early Universe, Fall 2013
    View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/8-286F13
    Instructor: Alan Guth
    Professor Alan Guth talks about the Big Bang, cosmic inflation, evidence for inflation, Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), dark energy, and whether or not our universe is part of a multiverse.
    License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
    More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
    More courses at ocw.mit.edu

ความคิดเห็น • 439

  • @NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself
    @NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself 10 ปีที่แล้ว +495

    How cool is it that today, I can turn on my computer, go to TH-cam and watch Alan Guth speak on cosmology?
    Like, MIT OCW is cool enough, but that is *Alan Guth* himself talking about *his* theory.
    What a time to be alive.

    • @nonokayakjack
      @nonokayakjack 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is ridiculous fantasy just like the fake theory that we came from apes. How can people believe this crap? We where made by a big man in the sky in 6 days. We even see his son every now and then. When we die, if we're good, we go to a big amusement park in the sky. God!.....oops.

    • @sourabhkhandelwal1568
      @sourabhkhandelwal1568 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@nonokayakjack because men did not come from apes, humans and ape shares the same ancestors, that is if you trace back the ancestors of us and the apes, you will eventually find a common ancestor. Evolution is like a branch and not a ladder and all the life system that has existed on the Earth can be imagined as a giant tree with a great diversity of different life forms all ultimately having the same origin(the root of the tree). Evolution is a fact and it's evidences are everywhere around us.
      Sorry to break it to you but if you can not understand it then it means that you simply do not have the intelligence to do that.

    • @user-fo8lz6om7l
      @user-fo8lz6om7l 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I was literally on my way to make this exact comment, tears in my eyes im so excited.

    • @imaseeker100
      @imaseeker100 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sourabhkhandelwal1568 fucking windbag. so who is our common ancestor?

    • @98danielray
      @98danielray 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sourabhkhandelwal1568 the guy is trolling

  • @mrtpsoroush
    @mrtpsoroush 9 ปีที่แล้ว +215

    Holy smokes ! undergraduate Inflationary cosmology taught by Alan Guth !!!

    • @justiceretrohunter2
      @justiceretrohunter2 9 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      mrtp i said the same thing, i was like "Damn, this is the real deal."

    • @bautistakeithcharles3302
      @bautistakeithcharles3302 6 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Yeah and for free. Doesn’t get any better than that.

    • @timblizzard4226
      @timblizzard4226 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Sweet deal huh?

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Holy smoke, you obviously have not seen this one: th-cam.com/video/VHhUCav_Jrk/w-d-xo.html

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who is right? th-cam.com/video/VHhUCav_Jrk/w-d-xo.html

  • @inkedolympia23
    @inkedolympia23 8 ปีที่แล้ว +196

    I actually get to learn from Alan Guth as opposed to just watching him in snippets in documentaries... Whhaaaaaaaattt!?!? This is AMAZING! One of the many reasons why MIT OCW is one of the best things the Internet has to offer.

    • @emerichfiala7238
      @emerichfiala7238 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Inked Olympia Agree totally.

    • @roop-a-loop
      @roop-a-loop 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      and he writes in comic sans lol

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who is right? th-cam.com/video/VHhUCav_Jrk/w-d-xo.html

    • @ElliottCC
      @ElliottCC ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolutely!

    • @aaronooi8409
      @aaronooi8409 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i know right!!!

  • @wagsman9999
    @wagsman9999 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Well, it took me a few weeks to get through these (the math is not trivial, but doable if you have some familiarity with calculus and differential equations). I must give a big thanks to MIT for providing this series. Professor Guth is passionate about the subject, obviously knows the material better than most, and is a great lecturer. I was a bit sad when the series came to an end.

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle ปีที่แล้ว

      Mathematics does not ‘prove’ anything. It is only a human-invented method of measurement. As such, it can only comply with whatever we pretend to ourselves is worthy of measuring..

  • @Julian-tf8nj
    @Julian-tf8nj 9 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    A BIG THANKS to MIT and the *awesome* Alan Guth for this excellent course! :)

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle ปีที่แล้ว

      Mathematics does not ‘prove’ anything. It is only a human-invented method of measurement. As such, it can only comply with whatever we pretend to ourselves is worthy of measuring..

  • @guillermomartin8353
    @guillermomartin8353 7 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    MIT OCW I LOVE YOU SO MUCH.

  • @owen7185
    @owen7185 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Alan Guth, deadset legend. Some people are born to educate, he's one of them. I enjoy these lectures mostly because of the way he presents them

  • @krishnachandradas8386
    @krishnachandradas8386 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No documentary can teach this in so much depth.

  • @Messier31NGC224
    @Messier31NGC224 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank you for publishing this online!! What an amazing resource

  • @gilbertengler9064
    @gilbertengler9064 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Many many thanks dr. Alan Guth, you are one of my favorite physicists! So clear explained.

  • @samikshyasahoo102
    @samikshyasahoo102 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My mind is blown. I am a 9th class student from a small town of India watching this MIT lectures by just clicking on my phone

  • @paullogeman9189
    @paullogeman9189 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A clear, concise and meticulous presentation on a complex topic.

  • @philrudski9084
    @philrudski9084 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you for making this series of informative videos. Thank you Alan and MIT OCW.

  • @dynamixthunder724
    @dynamixthunder724 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    love from a indian village student❤️

    • @shivanshjha938
      @shivanshjha938 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      From which village you are? And in which class you are studying or what are you pursuing?

    • @Justaguy10723
      @Justaguy10723 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      all the best bhai do good

  • @meetghelani5222
    @meetghelani5222 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is pure gold, thanks to professor lewin's lecture's recommendation that i got to know this gem of a human that professor Alan Guth is!

  • @krzysiekmargo797
    @krzysiekmargo797 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's a great performance here by Alan but DAMN.. Full respect for those who chaptered subtitles in this vid. gr8 work!

  • @cheesechizel594
    @cheesechizel594 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    his crew needs professional film/audio/lighting equipment - these lectures deserve it - thanks for making them available

  • @nmarkose
    @nmarkose 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Alan Guth is amazing at describing a very complex subject!

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle ปีที่แล้ว

      Mathematics does not ‘prove’ anything. It is only a human-invented method of measurement. As such, it can only comply with whatever we pretend to ourselves is worthy of measuring..

  • @peterlue1156
    @peterlue1156 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you for this Dr. Guth!

  • @abdullahlaith2629
    @abdullahlaith2629 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I'm 15 and watching this, I really love Astrophysics and Cosmology. I hope one day I could study it in MIT though, highly doubt I will :(

    • @loserface9556
      @loserface9556 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      i believe in you stranger

    • @wecare838
      @wecare838 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I hope you do. However, remember it doesnt have to be undergraduate only though, where tuition fees are large, acceptance rate is low etc. You can crack the jee advance and study in iit or nit and then after your bachelors you can apply in mit in your chosen fields. There you have experience, so your chance of getting in is higher plus they most likely would pay you stipends as you do research(and/or get an internship, which often pays well) where the essence of mit comes alive. Or you can, after bachelors do your masters in a non ivy league university, say for instance, texas a&m and then apply for phd in mit. Then your chance of acceptance goes even higher, you will be paid(cause you're doing research now, bringing new knowledge into the world and your hard work is compensated by the remuneration) and you actually get to experience the world class research experience, professors labs latest techniques that mit is famous for, up close.
      So remember its not a one shot chance, new opportunities actually come up as you climb up the ladder. Best of luck. You can do it :)

    • @wecare838
      @wecare838 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I call it Indian intuition😅 at least someone from the Indian Subcontinent.

    • @khansaahmad2558
      @khansaahmad2558 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey! believe in yourself, you will do it! It's amazing that you are doing it when you are 15, just don't stop........ keep on working, falling, standing and you'll soon achieve your dreams!

    • @abdullahlaith2629
      @abdullahlaith2629 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@khansaahmad2558 Haha! This came in time! I just took my first SAT test- probably did poorly. I was sad and then got a notification for this comment. I will register for May and retake the test ;).

  • @palvindarchhokar9821
    @palvindarchhokar9821 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What a great lecture, so freaking mind blown.

  • @mylittleelectron6606
    @mylittleelectron6606 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I was surprised to hear him say it's a small class. Taking a course on inflationary cosmology taught by Alan Guth is like hearing your instructor for general relativity is Albert Einstein!

  • @jurgenblick5491
    @jurgenblick5491 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He is so clear. It is easy to follow him.

  • @user-ej3lw6up2j
    @user-ej3lw6up2j 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    this is why i like you tube.

  • @lmelin1959
    @lmelin1959 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A very interesting lecture, thank you Mr Guth.

  • @jo-anseipp8073
    @jo-anseipp8073 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Many thanks MIT.

  • @tomneedham1937
    @tomneedham1937 9 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Many moons ago - 1981 perhaps? - Shortly after Prof. Guth proposed his Inflationary hypothesis, Prof. Guth passed through my hometown and gave a lecture on Inflation at our local Planetarium. The room at the Planetarium is big enough to hold approx. 200 people. If my memory is correct - and I have no reason to doubt it - there were maybe 25 people in the audience listening to Prof. Guth. Go figure!! That's the bad news. The good news is my small library of books has a copy of Prof. Guth's book "The Inflationary Universe", personally signed by him, purchased at that lecture. Was his presence in my hometown a quantum fluctuation? Regardless of the Uncertainty Principle, I knew there was certainty in my need to have attended that lecture!

    • @shirleymason7697
      @shirleymason7697 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      TOM NEEDHAM ........would you be surprised to hear that I recently had to explain to a local woman the difference between our solar system and the Milky Way? This woman had a career and college undergrad degree.

  • @gangguo1162
    @gangguo1162 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    a great scientist and lecturer

  • @mcxzsa
    @mcxzsa 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you, dear professor

  • @albertosamaniego2476
    @albertosamaniego2476 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    the man, the genius, the legend... Prof. Alan Guth

  • @brainstormingsharing1309
    @brainstormingsharing1309 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Absolutely well done and definitely keep it up!!! 👍👍👍👍👍

  • @EvoArtsLLC
    @EvoArtsLLC 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Roland Gerard to increase knowledge you must speculate.
    I think it's a great thought experiment and disapproving it out proving it is the act of science therefore teaches the discipline.

  • @Vikermajit
    @Vikermajit 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome explation. Tqvm, sir.

  • @wagsman9999
    @wagsman9999 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Earth is an "significant lump" - love this!

  • @nathanokun8801
    @nathanokun8801 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The "Dark Energy" large values for short wavelengths is exactly analog to the "Ultraviolet Catastrophe" that occurred with light physics in the late 1800s and was solved by Planck by creating the original equations for Quantum Mechanics to create the "Black-Body Curve" formula for light relative to temperature. It seems that we need a Quantum Mechanics equivalent to solve Dark Energy. "The more things change, the more they stay the same."

  • @austenbaker4618
    @austenbaker4618 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU MIT!!!

  • @perrydubreuil1514
    @perrydubreuil1514 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for this

  • @imaseeker100
    @imaseeker100 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    freekin' awesome teacher too.

  • @gixxerboy555
    @gixxerboy555 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So...as we come to the point....the stars are our parents...?Much respekt for this Dr.Alan Guth...wow

  • @MrKayojc
    @MrKayojc 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks by wonderful video!

  • @janphilipzen5448
    @janphilipzen5448 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you for this

  • @malolangovindarajan5858
    @malolangovindarajan5858 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just awesome, very useful

  • @LuciFeric137
    @LuciFeric137 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Professor Guth is an excellent lecturer.

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle ปีที่แล้ว

      Mathematics does not ‘prove’ anything. It is only a human-invented method of measurement. As such, it can only comply with whatever we pretend to ourselves is worthy of measuring..

  • @mustafa1912
    @mustafa1912 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    was it brady haran at 01:00:50. hell of a lesson great great lecture.

  • @goldfishi5776
    @goldfishi5776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I applaud your institution for remaining open to comments. Certain other institutions are afraid of criticism. Imagine a system of science without dissent.

    • @vizman8585
      @vizman8585 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dissent is fine as long as it's based on science and not mythology.

  • @robertojordao1060
    @robertojordao1060 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    See what globalization made in my life: I'm a brazilian guy who learned english from internet and now I'm using this knowledge to lear a theory that I became aware of while I was listen to a podcast (Joe Rogan).
    What a crazy world!

    • @jaralara6429
      @jaralara6429 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Roberto Jordão I totally see what you mean! But I think the phenomenon you are talking about is best described as the information highway. Globalization sounds like an economic and geopolitical concept to most people

    • @robertojordao1060
      @robertojordao1060 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jaralara6429 Thank you! You see, there are still so many things to learn haha

  • @LIFEDELAYSDEATH
    @LIFEDELAYSDEATH 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Enjoyed lecture..

  • @narendraparmar1631
    @narendraparmar1631 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks MIT

  • @Mericosmos
    @Mericosmos 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Now i wish that i paid more attention to my English language course

  • @barbjephson
    @barbjephson 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pulsating universe is the expanding and cooling of the universe.

  • @stevewalker9743
    @stevewalker9743 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to see an explanation of i) where dark matter (and d. energy) fit into calculations of mass density, ii) how GR predicts all of these things (with, of course modifications like inflation) yet science can't make it work for outer radii of spinning galaxies, iii) how we can pin down the "age" of the universe when time itself is fluid (is it the "age" from our reference only?). Having said that, it's all pretty fascinating stuff. I saw Guth speak in the 80s at the U of Utah.

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle ปีที่แล้ว

      Mathematics does not ‘prove’ anything. It is only a human-invented method of measurement. As such, it can only comply with whatever we pretend to ourselves is worthy of measuring..

  • @kyojurorengoku1099
    @kyojurorengoku1099 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am 17 now I am not even in college but I don't like other subjects I don't like accounts or economics i like cosmology even if i am weak in maths space just pikes my interest too much i just didn't get enough marks to select science stream but when I found this video i was like actually too much interested in ti tomorrow is my English final exam and here I am watching this it's 😊

  • @ramankumar-kk9sl
    @ramankumar-kk9sl 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    good live long alan sir

  • @sameertomar5099
    @sameertomar5099 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alan guth wow

  • @williamcory4689
    @williamcory4689 9 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Please bring back Walter Lewin's videos. Those lectures were a big reason I grew a love for physics. Punish Walter Lewin. Don't punish all the people across the world who want to learn.

    • @reichhardbuerger1492
      @reichhardbuerger1492 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, his lectures were great and it is a pity not to find them anymore (on youtube at least). On the other hand: what would a victim of his acts feel if the guy, who forced her to humilitate herself, stay here on youtube, beeing a celebrated lecturer..? I really do understand both sites here, personally would still like to be able to watch his lectures. But I can understand that this just wouldn´t be approbriate - and would be seen as such... I guess, it was a difficult decision - and I think there would be more people protesting him staying on yt on that MIT brand than missing his lectures...

    • @williamcory4689
      @williamcory4689 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are right. I understand I am extremely biased because of how I feel about those lectures. Hopefully someday we get video of equal or even better lectures than Walter Lewin's about the subject.

    • @LnLwLDD
      @LnLwLDD 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Reichhard Buerger I just read the story when the lead accuser came out publicly. It sounds like she got upset when she found out he was flirting about with other girls. I don't understand how when only an online interaction you can be intimidated into discussing sexual fantasies and then sending naked pictures of yourself to the man. She said she started "cutting herself again" after 7 months of this activity. Dealing with mentally ill people, like the initial victim, I could see them pulling the video so they don't get sued.
      It just sounds fishy but I understand the universities stance. From her description it sounds as I said above though, regardless it's inappropriate activity for an instructor. Even though she was just taking non-credit online courses at her leisure it was through the university making it not a personal matter.
      I don't blame victims but I'm not seeing how she or any woman was victimized unless they each felt they were special because of the attention he gave online? Oh well, regardless not a good idea for a professor to do.

    • @kw1ksh0t
      @kw1ksh0t 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      His lectures were just classical mechanics though. It's not like they removed an extremely important resource such as this one. They removed lectures about the most basic and accessible physics for which there are many more (better) lectures, it's not really a significant loss

  • @maresfillies6041
    @maresfillies6041 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Science at it's best. :3 I love Science. That's why I'm a double major computer science and electrical engineering. For Science!!

  • @guillermorocha6661
    @guillermorocha6661 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It feels like the big guy who runs the show just throws more stuff in, as we look deeper into physics. It would be funny if we discovered it all boils down to "likely to exists" but in reality, nothing confirmed.

  • @apburner1
    @apburner1 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Energy: a property of objects which can be transferred to other objects or converted into different forms.
    Negative energy: a property of objects which cannot be transferred to other objects or converted into different forms?

  • @stevewalker9743
    @stevewalker9743 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ha....disregard i) below! You answered it. Still wonder about objective time and how GR adjusts to DM and DE.

  • @EvoArtsLLC
    @EvoArtsLLC 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you can accept a 1 dimensional ribbon becomes multidimensional object, you can then theorize that its a natural shape or structure that repeats by going through all of the diminsional shapes and then degrading.
    To measure this you would need to rationalize that a laser can become a 2d wave and through mirrors you can craft 3d then 4d then 5d etc... after it hits it's highest dimension it unravels the steps in order of creation then repeats.

  • @anushka.singh.02
    @anushka.singh.02 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So, can we just assume by the fact that the inflation "material" was flat as per Euclidean geometry, the idea of the multiverse suggests that there might be other universes thriving in those flats and one goes to the next dimension they might see those Euclidean flats of universes??

  • @kw1ksh0t
    @kw1ksh0t 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 42:09 the caption saying "[? lab manuals ?]" I think he says "allowed range" here

  • @ManyHeavens42
    @ManyHeavens42 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yes,!

  • @StaticBlaster
    @StaticBlaster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love learning these things. I have an insatiable appetite for learning these complex topics in physics. On the other hand, religious dogma bores the hell out of me. Science is way more interesting and exciting than superstition.

  • @tekin491
    @tekin491 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:00:09 En dikkat çekici karanlık enerji adayı = Vakum enerjisi
    1:01:17 Karanlık enerji, neden daha önceden değil de 5 milyar yıl önce etkin olmaya başladı

  • @mdabunayeem8067
    @mdabunayeem8067 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The legend himself!

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, the multiverse is a legend. :-)

  • @goldfishi5776
    @goldfishi5776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very seldom do I see a lecture that walks through exactly how the data developed the theories we’ve applied.

  • @saadibnasaadhusain
    @saadibnasaadhusain 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are you going to post the 8.962 General Relativity lectures?

  • @wnderer4365
    @wnderer4365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    thank you very much for this,
    i can't believe i can now study about inflation from the father of inflation himself....

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle ปีที่แล้ว

      Mathematics does not ‘prove’ anything. It is only a human-invented method of measurement. As such, it can only comply with whatever we pretend to ourselves is worthy of measuring..

  • @jlpl3291
    @jlpl3291 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:03:00...why aren't short wavelengths in the vacuum fluctuations bounded by the energy of a quantum in the same was as the solution to the Ultraviolet Catastrophe?

  • @robertbizzarro8586
    @robertbizzarro8586 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's rather marvelous. 😆

  • @andrewpaul8732
    @andrewpaul8732 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We know that in many years black holes will evaporate and leave only empty space but can space itself deteriorate? And in an unbelievable long time all that will be left is time itself and then It creates space. Which then inflates and so on. Or is space here now and it's here for good.

  • @ultrafeel-tv
    @ultrafeel-tv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Where does the space come from into which the big bang supposedly expanded into...?

  • @mcxzsa
    @mcxzsa 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Genius

  • @TheBigBangggggg
    @TheBigBangggggg 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Alan Guth: just another human being having solved the problems of other human beings who have not the faintest idea either. But it pays.

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mathematics does not ‘prove’ anything. It is only a human-invented method of measurement. As such, it can only comply with whatever we pretend to ourselves is worthy of measuring..
      Truth does not care about the ‘money’..
      spaceandmotion

    • @TheBigBangggggg
      @TheBigBangggggg ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fluentpiffle Observations (so far) show there is only one universe. String Theory (I call it String Speculation because nothing of the theory can be proven) is only an intellectual fantasy based on math. But math isn't reality ;-)

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheBigBangggggg "Observations (so far) show there is only one universe. String Theory (I call it String Speculation because nothing of the theory can be proven) is only an intellectual fantasy based on math. But math isn't reality ;-)"
      - You understand that 'observation' has many flaws to it, and even after 'observation' there comes the next phase, that of interpretation? The object of interpretation is that we correlate as accurately as we can with the nature of reality. That is the motivation behind genuine 'science', and being told how to do these things has no bearing on the actual nature of that which exists. Currently, genuine 'scientific method' is being largely ignored for political and financial purposes, and liberally showered upon the masses of 'believers' and 'followers' that frequent social media platforms such as this one.

  • @mcxzsa
    @mcxzsa 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for lecturing us to be normal at all

  • @justthefacts8872
    @justthefacts8872 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great lecture. His intonation reminds me of Katharine Hepburn.

  • @EvoArtsLLC
    @EvoArtsLLC 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    To answer in a conceptual way. Imagine a laser, that was projected to a point into 1 dimension, it filed the space then constorted into 2 dimensions.
    The process repeats to create other dimensions. But like a ball of yarn it always has an end, that then projects itself into another 1 dimensions plane and repeats.
    In my theory, there must be 2 (two) 1 dimensional planes for all dimensions to exist.

    • @spamnegg.1798
      @spamnegg.1798 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Matthew Egan What's constorted? Contorted means twist out of shape.

  • @ronthomas8331
    @ronthomas8331 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    25:00 does this means that as the universe ages it gets heavier because of more negative gravitational energy because of gravitational repulsion.

  • @kosmos6400
    @kosmos6400 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Hey uhh, a class I uhh actually wouldn't skip uhh! Thanks uhh :)

  • @user-is3tz8gp2x
    @user-is3tz8gp2x 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think we need an instrument(International Organization) to control global climate in the perspect of Orbital Mechanics. (including small debris and lanched projectile). I think that there are many forest fires than before

  • @ricardouchida9226
    @ricardouchida9226 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If inflation lasted until 10^-35 secs, what was driving the expansion of the universe from then onwards, given the inflation energy in the so called pocket universe has decayed? Alan mentioned a universe the size of a marble, how does the standard BB model explain subsequent expansion?

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle ปีที่แล้ว

      Mathematics does not ‘prove’ anything. It is only a human-invented method of measurement. As such, it can only comply with whatever we pretend to ourselves is worthy of measuring..

  • @user-cn2qr3se6y
    @user-cn2qr3se6y 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Univers began 13,82 billion years ago. I can't understand for what "clock" is that time? Let's imagine that two "clocks" was burn exact at that time us the univers and now one of that "clock" appears to be at my hand and another somewhere in the field with huge gravity. That to clocks will show absolutely different time and both are right.

  • @aplcc323
    @aplcc323 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Big Bangless Theory, I like it!

  • @johnschuster4287
    @johnschuster4287 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ditto😊

  • @user-cr8ml8tf2l
    @user-cr8ml8tf2l 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    اللهم لك الحمد على هاذه النعم.

  • @falvegas511
    @falvegas511 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Before you start spouting Multiple Universes, WHY DON'T YOU FIRST - DEFINE THIS ONE.

  • @haveltherock1169
    @haveltherock1169 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is quite possibly the weirdest rabbit hole I’ve gone down today

  • @mrgoodheaven3047
    @mrgoodheaven3047 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for breaking my misunderstanding of Big Bang.

    • @jacobvandijk6525
      @jacobvandijk6525 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great. Then explain it to me, please.

  • @cenelind
    @cenelind 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ok, cool.
    Now it finally makes sense to me why anyone would think there was a big bang. They Don't. Its a misnomer.
    Awesome Lecture.

  • @crushedz
    @crushedz 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does space expanding mean that every point in space is generating space exponentially?Is metric expansion of space the creation/generation of space at every point thereafter too?Is the expansion of the Universe really the metric expansion of space?Is there a force associated with the expansion[/generation?] of space that propels galaxies?

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle ปีที่แล้ว

      Space is not expanding..
      Mathematics does not ‘prove’ anything. It is only a human-invented method of measurement. As such, it can only comply with whatever we pretend to ourselves is worthy of measuring..

  • @NeverCryWolf64
    @NeverCryWolf64 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow.

  • @mcarrasco45
    @mcarrasco45 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    una pena que no este traducido al español................saludos al Sr Guth

  • @hemsingh6785
    @hemsingh6785 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can someone tell me if universe is expanding then actual density of universe must be decreasing... Means value of omega is decreasing isn't it

  • @binkyloo8
    @binkyloo8 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 15:25 what does he mean by 16Gev as related to a proton?
    How does this related to energy at time of BB

    • @UteChewb
      @UteChewb 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      kT is a measure of the temperature / energy of particle in a system. k is Boltzmann's constant and T in kelvin. So, Energy = kT , since k is 1.38e-23 J/K or more appropriately here, 8.617e-5 eV/K then 16 GeV = 1.6.e10 eV = k T. And T = 1.6e10 / 8.617e-5 .... the temperature will be *huge*. Something like a hundred million million degrees kelvin.

  • @noshitripathi9524
    @noshitripathi9524 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What if the inflation and big bang theory would act as indirect recursion??

  • @aryangod2003
    @aryangod2003 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this for undergraduate physics and astronomy majors? Material seems very simplified.

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle ปีที่แล้ว

      Mathematics does not ‘prove’ anything. It is only a human-invented method of measurement. As such, it can only comply with whatever we pretend to ourselves is worthy of measuring..

  • @sherlockholmeslives.1605
    @sherlockholmeslives.1605 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think that he knows his stuff.

  • @travisfitzwater8093
    @travisfitzwater8093 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The inflation field was a large gas of helium and hydrogen and there was no prior prior bang. There was a big cooking. With high energy beams from Quasars, probably.

    • @travisfitzwater8093
      @travisfitzwater8093 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, a tiny bit of lithium, true.

    • @travisfitzwater8093
      @travisfitzwater8093 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Have they ever tried super heating a combination of those elements, in the most likely analogous percentages/ proportions.?

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Directly on topic, "of course" the Inflationary aspect is a Reciproction-recirculation Quantum Tunnelling inclusion-exclusion timing-phase positioning Multiverse, because temporal wave-packaging is perfectly interpenetrating In-form-ation, for inside-outside holographic time-timing sync-duration, loop quantization presence.., ie superposition in Superspin here-now-forever holography.
    There is no new news only new angles, the inherent word meaning of "Universe" is the self-defining Reciproction-recirculation fact of Eternity-now Interval Conception.
    "Precision is not Accuracy", so no matter how exactly the duration of the local Era is measured, the Accurate interpretation of e-Pi-i sync-duration continuity connectivity in the Eternity-now Black-body Interval is an absolute Zero Kelvin difference of No-thing Singularity positioning eternally, that is the absolutely Logical Statement of Mathematical Modulation Mechanism Singularity inside-outside holographic presence, or Quantum Tunnelling bubble-mode of the Universe.
    The basic concept of "Classical Big Bang Cosmology" is an impossibility, and only an impractical "Player" could believe it by looking without seeing real-time probabilistic Actuality.
    Dr Eric Learner's book The Big Bang Never Happened. BBT is a kind of insult to Experimentalist's Practical-Actual Intelligence.
    Even Wheeler's One Electron Theory is basically the recognition of Quantum Tunnelling inclusion-exclusion timing-phase positioning Chemistry.