ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 มิ.ย. 2024
- Aravind Srinivas, the chief executive of Perplexity, will discuss his company’s “answer engine,” a challenger to Google’s search engine that could reshape the web as we know it.
Hard Fork is a weekly look into the future that's already here. Hosts Kevin Roose and Casey Newton explore stories from the bleeding edge of tech.
Casey’s publication, Platformer: www.platformer.news/
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL
TikTok:www.tiktok.com/@hardfork?is_f...
Insta:
Kevin Roose- kevinroose...
Casey Newton - crumbler?h...
Twitter (X):
Kevin - x.com/kevinroose?s=20
Casey - x.com/CaseyNewton?s=20
Threads:
Kevin - www.threads.net/@kevinroose
Casey - www.threads.net/@crumbler
Subscribe to the audio only podcast:
Apple - podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Spotify - open.spotify.com/show/44fllCS...
Amazon - music.amazon.com/podcasts/7c7...
Google - podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0...
The New York Times - www.nytimes.com/column/hard-fork - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Websites should probably just block the webcrawler from Perplexity since they aren't incentiving people to go to the website. Either that or Perplexity should pay them for the content used.
This was a great episode. What I gathered from here is that utilities like Perplexity will kill the internet.
Thanks for calling him out, especially on behalf of small local journalists.
Seconded!
I agree as well. I think in the future when Bing and Google align with journalists' interests, Perplexity will pick up the pieces and just be the bad guy in AI, selling off journalists' work.
@e1 i'm skeptical of Perplexity too but Bing and Google align with journalist interest's? They rarely align with their users. Their products have been getting worse. Bing and Google have been scraping websites for decades. One thing for sure is they only align with corporations.
@@BadWithNames123 ... U mad, bro? 😆
the point of content is to get someone to read what you wrote IN A PLACE WHICH IS BENEFICIAL TO YOU
AI people really just talk nonsense all the time, makes sense they think AI is so good
Great work.
The commoditisation of content will just accelerate. News publishers produce similar content so need to avoid a race to the bottom mediated by bots
god, he's just the essence of SV techies. Let's use a LLM for all this use cases. Do we need that? No, but doesnt matter!
Millions of users say you’re wrong. You’re the essence of a sv hater. No actual substance.
I like the summaries of information. They save the user a lot of work and reading.
Maybe adds from the source documents could be shown on Perplexity featuring a list of related articles and topics from that source (articles from NY Times freely advertised as a token of payment). Or money payments for the number of reference links used per day from each source that is not publicly available free data.
This man is awesome and Naive at the same time :)
"If more people see that, it's good for you."
No, no it's not. You get to make money, but we don't? Awareness doesn't pay my team.
Gross negligence from another AI platform.
I don’t think perplexity will last long. Google has powerful LLM. they just need connect to a flow. Thats the real deal. Once they done it,other players will be dusted.
Good cop bad cop routine
The hosts are a bit unfair, because their real concern is the business model of their profession (journalism). It is for the journalists to figure out how to adapt to the technological trend, not the other way around.
This episode just confirmed that Perplexity is just another Wrapper startup. Sad to see people want to jump into the AI race to make money and doesn't care much about the society and the impact
Oh dear…the journalistic privilege of being seen? This out of touch mentality is almost diabolical within AI ..
Some constructive feedback for Aravind: focus groups and media training
love hard fork and the vibe, but in truth, tired of Kevin's lame and sorta mean platformer disses.
Dude, they're very good friends. It didn't come across as mean or lame to me.
Krawl AI is a pretty awesome alternative