Loved what you said at 3:37, "Just because someone said it can't be done, maybe someone hasn't thought of the right idea yet". Worked in industry 38 years now, can't tell you how many times I've solved a problem just because someone threw out an idea, or vice versa.
Earnshaw theorem can be overcomed by spinning a permanent magnet below another permanent magnet it achieves stable equilibrium. Check my video on the latter for proof
That doesn't break earnshaws theorem... If you are using energy to maintain equilibrium then it doesn't count... :) I am aware of magnet levitation devices and diamagnetic bismuth, etc. the interesting thing about this is it is only permanent magnets.
Loved what you said at 3:37, "Just because someone said it can't be done, maybe someone hasn't thought of the right idea yet". Worked in industry 38 years now, can't tell you how many times I've solved a problem just because someone threw out an idea, or vice versa.
Where are you from ?
@@nikson1520 Claremore Oklahoma
@@davidright1014✌️😊 I from Brasil and your Word's true.
Hope you have tried 2 of the inverted magnets together 😊
@@xenthosbobo yes I tried 4
@@MatthewRodgers did 4 make anything interesting happen?
@@xenthosbobo I think it changed the node distance some
This makes me think of a magnetic drive shaft. Possibly it would be valid in vacuum where thermal isolation is important.
This is one cool example of a THEOREM at work. Would you know how to make a working magnet motor Matthew ?? Peace v
The simplest magnet motor you can make at home is called a "homopolar motor" I have a video of that on this channel.
@@MatthewRodgers I will check it out Sir. Thanks v
ชอบการค้นพบของคุณ มันไม่ติดกัน แต่มีคุณสมบัติทั้งสองที่ มันติดกันและดึงดูดกันอันมีช่องว่างไว้ให้เราศึกษาเพื่อ
"รู้ยิ่งเห็นจริงในสิ่งที่ควรรู้ควรเห็น"ของพลังงานที่มีในช่องว่าง
love it, its like a 2d magnetic levitation
Confront magnetic lines N and S.
Fantastic 😊
Earnshaw theorem can be overcomed by spinning a permanent magnet below another permanent magnet it achieves stable equilibrium. Check my video on the latter for proof
That doesn't break earnshaws theorem... If you are using energy to maintain equilibrium then it doesn't count... :) I am aware of magnet levitation devices and diamagnetic bismuth, etc. the interesting thing about this is it is only permanent magnets.