Kia Stonic vs SEAT Arona - Which is better?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 13

  • @CarLifeSG
    @CarLifeSG  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is a continuation of the SEAT Arona review which you can check out here : th-cam.com/video/eyizd1zCrk0/w-d-xo.html
    SEAT Arona POV drive : th-cam.com/video/xvM0FoPqPpk/w-d-xo.html
    Kia Stonic Review : th-cam.com/video/lJj2Hyh3yUA/w-d-xo.html
    Kia Stonic POV drive : th-cam.com/video/RdG0lpZaibw/w-d-xo.html

    • @zenlee8479
      @zenlee8479 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The in-car idle vibration of the 3-cylinder engine of a Kia Stonic is mild I would say as compared to wait till u try the Opel Crossland X ‘s 1.2 turbo 3 cylinder engine. The auto start-stop mechanism is so coarse and abrupt...🤦‍♂️...will be waiting to see if a mega comparo of Kia Stonic vs Seat Arona vs Toyota Raize vs Opel Crossland X vs Nissan Qashqai !

  • @vsensation8872
    @vsensation8872 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    95/100 for this machine almost suit perfect for my type of usage.
    After 1 month got used to this FUN to drive ARONA 1.0 TSI DSG, I knew Im not going back car's without TURBO engine anymore.
    Now after 2 years If have to choose again, ARONA will still be my 1st choice.

  • @haydenlim1087
    @haydenlim1087 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Should review and compare more! Feel like Cerato and avante would be a good video!

    • @CarLifeSG
      @CarLifeSG  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      good idea 👍

  • @ofri6309
    @ofri6309 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice review!
    How's life in Singapore? :)

  • @ernestquek6697
    @ernestquek6697 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep it up 💯💯

  • @zleipnirgoh5972
    @zleipnirgoh5972 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about reviewing a KIA Stinger 2.0? And do a comparison of Sportback cars? BMW 4 grancoupe, Audi A5 sportback and Stinger?

    • @CarLifeSG
      @CarLifeSG  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thank you for the suggestion. will look into it !

  • @carr16k
    @carr16k 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I don't think comparing a car is about who has the highest score. Everyone has different preference or needs. So counting score is a bit pointless. Instead, could have summarised it by saying something like for people looking for a car with A features, choose this car. And for those who are looking at cars with B features, choose that car.

    • @CarLifeSG
      @CarLifeSG  4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      thanks for sharing. the score is to keep track of which car did better in the different aspects. if not it'll be confusing which car is better in which area after watching.
      if we only compared features, it wont be fair. because the arona definitely has more features, but it's also more expensive.
      so we also have to look at price, interior, practicality, performance - these are things buyers will take into account. like you said, everyone has different needs and preferences

  • @comments7335
    @comments7335 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    No such thing as a "continental car". It's actually a singlish term used only in Singapore for European cars. KIA is also in the Asian's continent. Still,good comparison.

    • @CarLifeSG
      @CarLifeSG  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you. “Continental” in this context refers to mainland Europe, therefore continental car i.e a European car