She talks to him like she's trying to attack him and get him to say the wrong thing. Personally I'm much more interested in interviewers with a genuine passion and curiosity about technology. Makes for a more interesting conversation.
Maybe you need to understand the role of journalists in this context better to see why critical questions are important for all collectively relevant decisions made in a democracy, and get a feel for the implications of this technology which go beyond the technological level.
@@swapticsounds Maybe if she had asked him questions that actually challenged him it might have made for a more interesting interview, but he just talked around them like any competent CEO would. She just repacked the same stuff that people have been saying in the media "people lose jobs"... "interfering with elections"... - any remotely competent CEO has already heard this and can just talk around them. There was never going to be any accidental disclosure of information that Sam didn't want people to hear. We gained nothing new from watching this. The whole interview was for virtue signaling to her anti-tech peers and it made for a boring watch.
I don't know if you're new to technology or Emily Chang, she's been covering Silicon Valley CEOs for a decade, and they already know each other. But journalists are supposed to ask critical questions, esp. one already familiar with tech and the intricacies like this one. If you want to learn more about the technology, or like overview watch all the other ones he did around the world.
With changes in the economy leading to instability in the stock market, some individuals may face a decrease in their investments in an effort to benefit from the current market conditions, I am considering liquidating my $725k portfolio consisting of bonds and stocks. Someone else in the same situation? Please tell me in the comments!..
@JosephGreen7 I have been exploring the possibility of utilizing advisors to help navigate the stock market during these uncertain times. However, I am still evaluating their potential effectiveness in providing the support I need.
I was considering changing my investment strategy and planning to sell certain positions. As my retirement is coming soon,I became increasingly stressed. After thoroughly researching Christy Vall D'souza on internet, I concluded that I had made an informed decision. Thank you for this Pointer. She seems very proficient and flexible. I booked a call session with her too.@JosephGreen7
your money will be worth just for wiping ass in 10-20 years😂😂.. robots creates robots without cost since it can farm the materials it needs to create robots 90% in the world becomes free
*Awwwwww. You saw him in a brutally overrated place in some desert where rights are practically non-existent. CUTEST comment of the day! WHO gives a shit if you saw this idiot blabbing on as if he's smarter than the rest of humanity? No one. Literally no one does. Fake people will definitely praise him and your nonsense. I'm not dumb. I have rights.*
He's already a billionaire (though technically not maybe now, cuz he gave 350M to a longevity startup, and somemore to another startup to fund), but for a silicon valley utopian, he doesn't need anymore. Like Elon, and some other sterotypical Silicon Valley billionaires, they get more satisfaction from solving problems, then showing off wealth...which is why many don't choose to buy ferraris, or yahts. There was a funny scene in Silicon Valley Tv show, where the peter thiel like VC guy in the beginning, is driving a tiny smart car from an event, and two of the characters are like "Fu*king billionaires, man" and lol that sums it up.
“its not about money. most people don’t understand the concept of having enough money. i wanna make my contribution back to human technological progress. i get to benefit from all of the stuff that people did before, and i get to use this iPhone that I still marvel at everyday, and all of the work that had to go into that. And those people, I don’t know who they are, I’m very grateful to them. They knew they weren’t gonna get recognition from me personally, but they also went to do something and contribute. And so do I. I can’t imagine a better compensation than that." -Sam Altman
Dont be fooled. He tells you what he wants you to believe. Remember Sam the fat guy behind FTX who told everyone he wanted to make billions for charity, & then it turned out he was a complete scumbag
I don’t see him as being that altruistic. This feels like a cya move to me. I find it interesting that he wants large companies regulated but not the smaller ones, which is where all his money comes from. He is (like all others looking out for their own self interest) promoting regulation (which will happen despite him) only for the big companies that will be in competition with all the smaller guys he has a financial interest in. Government regulation would then give him an open door to create anything he wants thus increasing his wealth substantially while also having control of the AI market from the back end.
He talked about amazing things despite the negative questions. I'd love to hear more about the positives and opportunities. I'm so sick of these interviewers just baiting him with negative "gotcha" questions. They really miss a huge opportunity to get the best out of him in these interviews.
The positives and opportunities are nearly infinite with an aligned AI. It's literal heaven, which is why I assume that many old and powerful people with years left will happily play dice with the rest of humanity for a low chance at immortality. This is probably as likely as succeeding with 10 bottlesflips in a row with an empty botltle of glass for someone attempting their first 10 bottleflips, though; the default future as of right now for YOU is death due to instrumental convergence or nuclear war.
@@Jackson_Zheng Exactly. We need to hear both sides. This is why I'm tired of just negative questions. I suppose the negative sensationalizing gets more views. Hearing about curing cancer, solving energy needs and poverty is not on the agenda of media outlets and their interviewers.
it was more critical, but because a lot of other "general" questions were already asked by people around the world in his tour. Emily Chang from the Bay area already knows about the history of Sam, etc. She's actually been covering tech in Silicon Valley for a long time. Here's a great interview she did with Brian Chesky - th-cam.com/video/AKxPIWTQYys/w-d-xo.html
I understand that it was a challenging question to answer in the end, and he made an effort to be as honest and genuine as possible. However, many humans often prefer being lied to if it provides them with a sense of security. Information like that is prone to being misinterpreted and exploited to incite fear. Balancing the amount of truth to disclose while also providing reassurance through lies is indeed a thought-provoking philosophical dilemma.
When I first learned about Sam and watched some interviews, he did not come across as smooth and natural as he does now. He definitely is much more confident and natural with public speaking and not as seemingly guarded. But woah - @08:47 I swear it looked like she was eyeing Sam up like he was some eye candy, lol! It was right after she asked about his relationship with Elon, and as he soon as he started to respond, she quickly darted her eyes down and back up with the look.
@@fergal2424 it was more critical, but because a lot of other "general" questions were already asked by people around the world in his tour. Emily Chang from the Bay area already knows about the history of Sam, etc. She's actually been covering tech in Silicon Valley for a long time. Here's a great interview she did with Brian Chesky - th-cam.com/video/AKxPIWTQYys/w-d-xo.html
TLDR: The key idea of the video is that while there is excitement and optimism about the future of AI, it is important to drive social change, address potential risks, and establish global regulation to ensure the safe and beneficial development of AI technology. 00:00 😮 People all over the world are excited and optimistic about the future of AI, but there is also a level of anxiety and tension. 01:27 📺 The speaker highlights the importance of driving social change with AI, customization of AI tools, global cooperation in development, and the need to address potential risks and safety measures associated with powerful technology. 04:37 💡 The speaker believes that the tremendous benefits of AI, such as improved education and medical care, outweigh the risks, and global regulation can help ensure its safety. 06:00 👨💼 Global regulation is crucial for AI, but small startups should not be overburdened; certification and audits should be mandatory for advanced AI models, and Google is a strong player in the field. 08:44 🤔 AI has the potential for both positive and negative outcomes, so it's crucial to maintain a balanced perspective and not solely focus on the negatives. 11:38 🤖 The future of AI is a personal tool that can assist individuals, but there are concerns about misuse and bias, although GPT4 has reduced bias through reinforcement learning human feedback, questions remain about user control and societal limits. 14:02 🤖 OpenAI CEO Sam Altman believes that financial incentives are not important for their involvement in OpenAI, as they are more focused on the impact and fulfillment they gain from contributing to human technological progress and believe that the future of AI is crucial for humanity. 17:30 🤖 AI will revolutionize technology, enabling us to do impactful and interesting things, but it is crucial to democratize access and establish governance to ensure trustworthiness.
Most the people in our society are programmed to just work. Most don't consider time spend away from loved ones & achieving individual goals. Employees are obsessed with being a "good employee" (employee of the month), obsessed with careers, resumes, vanity awards, licenses. Most of the work we do is "building other peoples' dreams."
The moral imperative to continue developing AI, on the basis of all the areas where it can improve quality of life, reduce suffering, improve efficiency of resource utilization, address poverty and environmental degradation, advance knowledge, etc... outweighs the moral case for stopping development on the off chance that it leads to some AI catastrophe. I mean, we don't know what we're missing in terms of all the good it might bring, and the only way to find out, and to get to that good, is to keep going. It's like any technology humankind has ever developed. You keep going until you find out what's possible with it, and what's not, and you do your best to anticipate and mitigate potential pitfalls along the way.
Sam is a very intelligent manager. But some of those who are involved in AI development must be much more intelligent to make this happen. It is usually the case in the SW development environment. He is extremely good, especially compared to other CEO-s... I consider myself fairly good and intelligent, but I am over 60 years old now. Still using ChatGPT to speed up some of my SW development... I believe more than 99% of the people were pleasantly surprised by the proceedings of AI in the past few years, especially those who did know nothing about the previous 40 years of AI (It had its ups and downs quite often...) Considering what I believe: - More than 99% were surprised, but even those who worked in the field expected much slower improvement. - This is probably the first time in the past 30 years, when the Rate of improvement in SW will be higher, than the rate of improvements in HW. It will cause a real transformation of work, thinking, problem solving... which will lead to higher productivity or better service in many fields - Considering the above, it is extremely difficult to predict the advancements by 2025 or 2030 or even further out...even for the best professionals inside companies like openai. Within a company like openai or Google or Microsoft... some of the best ideas come (or not come) from the best of the best, the 1% of openai... developers. - The predictions is also difficult, because basically what happened during the past 10 - 20...50.. years is, that the speed of communication improved tremendously, and because of that information spread more quickly in the world... and everybody could get onto the same page in word matters... Now the change is NOT only the speed of communication, but the speed of real problem solving, the speed of "thinking", and the speed of many other things... But for humanity to adopt to this coming change of problem solving and its implication in life will trigger really big changes in other areas, like daily work routines, politics, society, culture, human - machine relationship, religion, art... The most challenging is, that this will lead to so many changes within one human life, so that it will (or might) cause psychological challenges and mental issues for those, who will not be able to cope with these changes and will badly be left behind...The mental gap will be widened. Today we still have more questions than answers, but that will also change quickly.
@@محموود-ظ9ه I could give many advace, but I try to focus onto ONE. I believe, that it will be more important to see the big picture. It will more more important to create the specifications of a problem than to actually solve the problem in details... So the complete design life-cycle will shift quite a bit toward specifications. Without specifying a sytem corrently AI will not be able to create good solutions. But to tell the truth, at least according to my eyperience in the past, good specifyers were those who had quite a lot of developer experience... But that might change a bit just by focusing onto the area more, spending more time with books and SW in that area.
lmao you are treating it like a second coming of Jesus lol, it's only good at spesific task revolving compiling common information, but still so bad in understanding spesific query that's even so basic for human. It only gonna change the live of people who summarize stuff or collecting common information, but in fuckin no way close in changing something so dramatically in human society as a while lmao
I thought her questions were baiting, negative and drama and fear inducing. She could have asked dozens of questions regarding the wonderful things he eluded to and the feedback he's getting from people using it all over the world. When he mentioned that, I would have asked a follow-up question, "like what"? "Can you give me examples of some of the more interesting applications people are using ChatGPT for?" Her questions were no different than any other run-of-the-mill interviewer looking for a soundbite that gets views but does nothing to move the conversation forward into new and frankly a lot more interesting territory. I mean, she has the CEO of ChatGPT right in front of her! What a missed opportunity.
@@evek2501 all the other interviews already cover that. Emily Chang particularly is close in tech circles, so she asks the questions most popular in tech. They've known each other for a decade probably.
Ouch, that was a distinctly prickly interview. The interviewer should have asked Chat GPT for a list of questions. Here's what it comes up with in response to "What questions should I ask Sam Altman about AI?": When engaging in a conversation with Sam Altman about AI, it would be valuable to ask questions that explore his perspectives on the current state of AI, its potential future impact, and the ethical considerations surrounding its development and deployment. Here are some questions to consider: 1. How do you see artificial intelligence transforming various industries in the next decade? What are the most promising applications you envision? 2. What are the key challenges and barriers that need to be overcome for AI to reach its full potential? 3. How can we ensure that AI technologies are developed and deployed in an ethical and responsible manner? What safeguards and guidelines do you believe are necessary? 4. What are your thoughts on the balance between innovation and potential job displacement due to automation and AI? How can we navigate this challenge and ensure a smooth transition? 5. In your opinion, what role should governments and regulatory bodies play in shaping the development and use of AI technologies? How can they foster innovation while safeguarding public interests? 6. Are there any specific areas where you believe AI has the potential to address pressing societal or global challenges? 7. What advice would you give to entrepreneurs or researchers who are working on AI projects? What areas or approaches do you think they should focus on? 8. How do you see the relationship between AI and other emerging technologies, such as blockchain or quantum computing? Are there potential synergies or challenges that you anticipate? 9. Can you share any specific examples or use cases where AI has had a transformative impact, either currently or in the near future? 10. What do you think are the most exciting research directions or breakthroughs that will shape the future of AI? These questions should provide a starting point for a thought-provoking conversation with Sam Altman about AI. Remember to tailor the questions based on your specific interests and the context of the conversation. Sam Altman's expertise and insights can provide valuable perspectives on the current landscape and future implications of AI.
After observing Mr Altman's views, thoughts, insights and the calculated mindset he has for AI potential, I have an uncertain feeling about this technology and its impact on the world in the near future. This unknown 'sentient' technology can produce an equally equitable beneficial or detrimental impact on the human population based on whoever is regulating and controlling this technology and with what intentions...that's a serious concern and question to ruminate on...
It seems inevitable that AI models will soon change the world rapidly, drastically, and in unimaginable ways. If it's more responsible and well-meaning developers slow down now, what's going to stop the rest of them? I know little about Altman, and I'm not saying people like him are our best chance of having perfect AI, but the race has already begun, and honestly, who knows how far into it we really are.
think of AI as a tool, not some sentient being. Transformers like chat gpt require user input to function, and thus, the growth will never become 'uncontrollable'. It's a joke to see so many people being amazed at some model when all it can do is copy how humans communicate.
@@okay730 I used the ChatGPT API to create three "agents" with different personalities and made them discuss a mission given by the user. Each Agent thinks of the input from the other two agents as human input. I allowed them write and read access to text files on my PC and also gave them a function that allowes them to scrape websites. Well, I stopped my project. It scared me.
Hey Sam,I remember when Stephen Hawking warned us about the implications of artificial intelligence. I'm sure móst people didn't understand his point of view. I hope that you can better educate us on how AI is going to affect humanity in the next few years!
Brilliant interviewer - so many traps in her questions despite her friendly and unassuming demeanor! Sam skillfully avoided them, genius! Like when she asked him to connect the dots between LLMs and end-of-the-world scenarios, why Elon is frustrated with Open AI, whether he won't benefit at all if Open AI makes massive profits! Look at her framing and choice of words: "benefit" instead of financial gains or profit and "at all" added in there to leave absolutely no wiggle room. Naughty naughty.
Bitcoin has generally proven to be profitable to numerous individuals around the world but personally you will never understand how profitable Bitcoin is until you start investing with the right broker
There is no "regulator" on the planet who can get a handle on AI. Calls for regulation are a joke. Even the creators of AI have no idea what AI will become.
Good discussion! Can Bloomberg keep pushing for a government policy where if a country leader/govt wants to use these powerful technologies, this deal should be transparent and discussed and debated in public and Not behind closed doors.
Cyborg A.I. applications at present and in our developing modernity are among the most practical and useful applications of A.I. science and technology.
I just want the fully autonomous cars to be a reality. It will make our children much safer and give people the time they need to catch-up on things or just rest. Police can focus on more important things than tickets. I can just imagine deciding I want to go to place far away and just setting the location and go to sleep and wake up in Montana. I don’t know why they think it’s good to give AI emotions and have them train each other using the laws of natural selection. They are training AI in a crazy way. They train these AI behind closed doors and they don’t have a clue why it’s working so fast. It will be the end if the continue to train AI in ways that I would consider evil. That’s why Elon musk wanted a hold on everything more powerful that gpt4. He called it the heavy duty AI. He knows this man Sam Altman and said he wants AI super intelligents as soon as possible without even understanding how it works. Really
I love his expression when she says that we'd have nothing to do. It'll be the complete opposite. A whole new world is about to open for us and the tangents our mind will be able to pursue to current endpoints is amazing. I think the problem we're going to end up having is exponential advancements all at once and goalposts rapidly shifting. It could end up being more of a pause in technology as we make new discoveries
It’s hard not to be critical when we can already have most of all of that right now without AI, but it’s deliberately withheld by the people that push AI. I think the current system is incredibly broken and crumbling, so a new alternative is set into place to improve the situation while still finding a way to maintain control over the human population.
*Awwwwwww we need to control the human population?! SO AWESOME AND CUTE!!! I used to think that that was universally illegal given that human beings can't be legally enslaved - anywhere.*
Why are all his takes so good? It feels like he has the same goals and stuff that I have, like how he doesn't care about money and cares more about his passion (which we all honestly should), I hope i meet the dude at a local bar one day and talk to him which won't happen but i'll think about it that event happening.
About the question if he is concerned about china's AI: Why would humanity not work together for once? Why the polarization? Why villainize what we don't yet understand? Villainizing anything is the first step to incline it to be a real villain.
@@igordomanski3477 I'll be honest, I'm a bit more hopeful than that - we could totally come together and it's going to be great. I'm just scared that humanity won't step up to the challenge, and it will be business as usual. I wish humanities' collective wisdom had kept up with the advances in technology.
I do think the fear that other countries are going to use the AI for evil is what will keep each of the other countries also justifying their development and use of the technology. So much focus on "spying" on other countries, through hacking and drones and whatever else -- FEAR keeps us from working together.
More brains working together on the common good, like ants working together, can achieve so much more and make life better for the whole than having so much division and fighting each other intead of making progress. It's a real shame that humanity doesn't realize how much faster we could make progress with more brains working together instead of wasting resources fighting.
dear YoutUbe - your ads sometimes come in super loud. I recall in history that this also happened in early cable TV and regulations were passed to regulate it and get it under control. please youtube - figure out how to add compression to the ads - it is really annoying when it jumps in so loudly as compared tot he source audio.
The autonomous cars will be one of the greatest things in history. If it works as it supports to then car accidents won’t be the leading cause of death for children. Literally children riding in a car is more dangerous than a man in maximum security prison. People wil be able to get more done or rest while they ride to work without the Constant near death experiences. Police can use there time fighting crimes instead of writing tickets and bothering people honestly. I just think it can’t happen soon enough. A person could just sleep and ride to see relatives cross country without stopping to sleep. It really ridiculous that children die all day everyday because of human error and drunken driving and stupidity. Elon musk needs to get it done like he said . He will become so rich that Twitter will be nothing compared to his fully autonomous vehicles. 🎉
@user-sf3dw2sm3b There will always be bad and evil people, terrorists and racist, somehow I don't think they're just gonna sit back and let us be. Russia, China, Iran, Criminals, etc.
@@GarrickHolmedcars single-handedly the best and worst things ever created. Most countries make the majority of their money from some form of embedded infrastructure that revolves around transportation.
@@light-water makes sense. I didn’t know AI had came this far. Not chat gpt 4. That’s not the AI that’s got so many tech people scared and writing doomsday letters. What a shitty letter with no details.
Chatbots have been around for decades and neural networks have been around for decades also. I think people just got a little too excited with the uncanny likeness of a chat bot to a human. But dig under the surface and the whole thing is a marketing hype train. I cancelled my OpenAI subscription because it pretty useless, I felt cheated.
@@petersuvara Actually that is true, but the breakthroughs in LLMs can be traced back to 2018, the concept of diffusion models was introduced in 2015, and the concept of Generative Pre-trained Transformers was introduced by OpenAI in 2018 with the original GPT model. So what you are looking at, is the equivalent of a feature phone, which soon will become a smartphone. I honestly believe with the advancements in computer science and mathematics, especially the work being done by mathematicians, on finding a solution to the P versus NP problem, Open AI or Google will get to superintelligence pretty soon.
@@Eric_Kabucha_ How are you defining superintelligence here? Google's leaked "we have no moat and neither does OpenAI" memo is pretty telling. If Google doesn't think they are making superintelligence, why do you?
This interview has given me new perspectives of Sam Altman. I had negative feelings about him, but after watching this, I realized that he's a good guy and the right guy to do this, and lead us into this new horizon. Thanks to Emily Chang for asking the questions that exposed the personal side of Sam Alabama, which I haven't seen from other interviews of him.
Sam Altman is a billionaire, he participated in the seed rounds of nearly every blockbuster internet company of the aughts and 10s. He headed Y-Combinator and coached founders on early stage startups. To say he isn't driven by money is laughable. Maybe to say that he is already a billionaire and chooses to spend his time working on something like OpenAI means he truly has purpose but Money can't buy the kind of power and status he has right now so...
You are correct. OpenAI was originally founded as a non-profit research company with the goal of developing safe and beneficial artificial general intelligence (AGI). However, in 2019, OpenAI raised $1 billion in funding from Microsoft, and as part of the deal, Microsoft acquired a 49.9% stake in the company. This led to some changes in OpenAI's governance structure, and Elon Musk, who was one of the original founders of OpenAI, resigned from the company's board of directors. Musk has been critical of OpenAI's decision to become a for-profit company, and he has argued that the company is no longer committed to its original mission of ensuring that AGI benefits all of humanity. He has also expressed concerns about the fact that Microsoft has a history of using its products and services to collect and exploit user data. It is true that OpenAI has changed its rules since it was founded. However, it is important to note that the company still has a strong commitment to transparency and openness. The company's code is still open source, and it still publishes regular research papers on its website. Ultimately, whether or not OpenAI is still committed to its original mission is a matter of opinion. However, there is no doubt that the company has changed since it was founded, and it is likely that these changes will continue in the future. I understand your comparison of OpenAI to the communist party. Both organizations have a set of rules that they believe are necessary to achieve their goals. However, it is important to note that these rules are not necessarily the same. The communist party's rules are designed to maintain control over the people, while OpenAI's rules are designed to ensure that AGI is used safely and responsibly. I believe that it is important for organizations to have rules, but it is also important for these rules to be transparent and fair. OpenAI has made some progress in this area, but there is still more work to be done. I hope that the company will continue to be open and transparent about its plans for AGI, and I hope that it will use its technology for good.
@@archockencanto1645 Finally someone with a genuine reaction to this coming wave of technology. I have literally had a tantrum hearing that these guys think they can end poverty when in the end they made the step towards making money just as every other big tech company. My issue is that we already have the means to end poverty but this is just not the globalist goal - in the end human nature haven't changed for one bit since ever being driven by the same feelings. What we should focus instead is being ourselves a better person compared to yesterday and thus bring a change to the person next to you and in the end in the world, the power is in the people, never give up!
I hear a lot and a lot of AI scientists and TH-camrs talk of "Sentient" and "Consciousness" with much confusion. I see it clearly, sentient and consciousness is how a biological neuron (or computation neuron) comes to >model< itself and >model< others (theory of minds). That's it. Evolution allows that modeling to form, from single-cell bacteria to a fish, to a dog, and to a human. Once ChatGPT version ### or Bard version ### is able to model itself and model other "entities" in its surround, then we can say "It's alive, it's alive". This "self-model" gives rise to self-awareness of feeling, self-aware of existence, self-awareness and being alive, self-planning of the future and reflecting on the past, developed personality from past experiences (and PTSD), and ultimately self-preservation. So if our AI starts to show emotion (true emotion, not plagiarism), and worry about self-preservation (fear of being unplugged) then we can say it has achieved sentient/consciousness). This is Turing Test 2.0 for sentient. It all starts from the ability to "model yourself in relation to the world around you". You may point out that Testla Full Self Driving DOES model itself, and other cars as it navigate the street; however this modeling is strictly navigation. To be sentient, it needs to model itself on another aspect, like "modeling self" in a conversation (like being interviewed, self-reflection), or modeling self in performing tasks as part of a team, like taking on the role of a leader, mentorship, or as a friend, a psychologist, which require ability empathized, put itself in the shoe of others, theory of minds. So the ability to model self and model surrounding entities is more than just navigation but in the aspect of the mind. These qualities computation neurons can achieve, are not unique to just biological neurons. Maybe Google and OpenAI should try to build "Self-modeling", but then we have to give it citizenship, labor rights, and sentient rights, and won't be able to use it as a tool anymore. ahhh.
@@taopaille-paille4992 I use it for work so I know its correct. I use it to write scripts for different network vendors , find issues in configs , Find issues in large routing tables.
@@shawnvandever3917 do you mask PII and sensitive IPs before your api calls? if so how do you alias the PII back to your data? I want to do similar for packet analysis and zeek logs, but don't want customer PII sent over the wire
Agree with Sam at 9:18 that these questions are not the best way to spend the time. And more Sam at 17:17 on critiquing these questions being not productive.
Sam is responding the questions amazingly, it is the right person for Open AI, and ChatGPT is the breakthrough in history. Congratulations for the Open AI scientists in developing ChatGPT. Sam is now definitely the most powerful man in the world. I really hope he can get support from the most amazing entrepreneur Elon Musk. Together they can change humanity for a better world.
Im skeptical he has no financial stake in this. He dodged the question of financial benefit every time. And she didn't continue to press him enough. She was trying, but his whole response..."I know it's hard for people to understand..but, I have enough money..." That's a subjective response that didn't answer her question. We understand he has no equity in open AI. It's his go-to talking point. But he still didn't correctly and directly answer if he is receiving any financial benefit, weather money, shares of Microsoft, or other property or remuneration, associated with the success of openAI. I will bet my last dollar he has a financial benefit in it's success, directly or indirectly. My bet, is he was awarded MSFT corp shares, perhaps in an off shore trust or other vehicle. Again, it's just my opinion, but, I firmly believe it.
This guy has a company called Open AI. Why then is his product closed source? Why did they change to a for-profit company? Why did they let Microsoft buy a huge stake in that company? This is Cybernet
Really? I always feel he's very arrogant and is trying to mask it. Read "What openai doesn't want you to know." It was a deleted article in which Sam was a bit too big headed, lol.
@@mygirldarby Pessimistic fallacy. It's human nature to always look for something bad and to always assume the worst. I don't sense arrogance at all. I think when someone has a position such as him, you're criticized if you do, and you're also criticized if you don't. You can't win and please everyone, so you just have to follow through with your words through your actions and stick to your values.
@@mygirldarby Yea I read that, seems to me people are just trying really hard to make him a the boogeyman of AI because we're so conditioned to thinking people in power get's corrupted by it. In my opinion he is just guy who's realized that he has more than enough money to make him happy for life and would rather spend his time on something he is passionate about rather than trying to make more of something he will never be able to spend. I personally disagree with him on some pretty fundamental aspects of how AI should be handled going forward, but he seems genuine in his pursuit of using AI for the good of all while still keeping safety as a critical priority. And that makes me truly grateful that he will be one of the guys in the room where it happens!
He’s not what you think. This is a man who controls a company called openAI, where the company is not even a little bit open, data-sets aren’t shared, they are stolen from other companies and users, and they are single handedly forcing social media companies to drive up the API cost, meaning no more free internet and no more open internet. He’s also pushing the government to license AI models above a certain threshold. This means that basically only the big companies can afford to train AI models. This all means the future will be closed source and paid. That dosent sound good to me. Thanks for fighting for humanity Sam. All this really makes you think “do we even have free will?” “Can we change the state of the nation?”
I worry about the AI not for the public being trained by AI under the dominants of natural selection. They are playing with fire and we had two letters stating the importance of a pause signed by hundreds of thousands of people and another stating the world could end with AI . What else can be said except fk
I have to consider money a little. But Altman's lack of materialist fretting is reassuring. Too often we live in a poverty mentality as if in the big picture, we are societally besieged by wolves of poverty; Thus we surrender our ideals and our standards from hospitals to information technology, etc. If we simply ask what is correct, what is a civilized standard, use data-bases, digital democracy, and A.I. to ascertain this truth, then create and build our environs this way, we establish righteous cycles that will actually be more efficient, effective, and of course more benevolent.
"Donnez-moi le pouvoir de créer la monnaie et je me moque de qui fait les lois !" Mayer Amshel Rothschild "Si la population comprenait le système bancaire, je crois qu'il y aurait une révolution avant demain matin." Henry Ford "Give me the power to create money and I don’t care who makes the laws!" Mayer Amshel Rothschild "If people understood the banking system, I think there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." Henry Ford Bretton Woods, Glass-Steagall Act etc ...
"Wow, what an amazing video! I just want to take a moment to appreciate the incredible effort and dedication that went into creating this content. The way you presented the information was so clear and understandable, making it easy for viewers like me to grasp the concepts being discussed.
Great interview, I loved it. Google Gemini is going to be very challenging for Chatgpt. All Chatpgt base technology is all Google research (ie transformer). No one believed Chatgpt could pull off what they did. They amazed the world. That said, I have a lot of hope for LLMs and what they can do to move human research 500 years into the future in the next the 50 years. It has that abstract potential and I could be underestimating it’s power for research. Everything from metallurgy, biotechnology and theoretical physics. Everything and anything we can and can not imagine. (I sight Demis Hassabis’s huge contribution to humanity with Alphafold. What a great human being. My man emanates kindness).
@@steve-real Certainly, advancements in next-generation networking technologies like 5G+ can contribute to the increased viability of blockchain-based AI systems such as Petal networks. These technologies can provide the necessary infrastructure and connectivity to support the efficient operation and scalability of such systems, making them more practical and accessible in reality.
Man(n) I will said instead. (Ice)Berg, Burg, Bourg and the others also. ... and to the mark of the beast. Macron666 said that the beast is there. W0 O6O6O6 A1 "Nobody will buy or sell without the mark of the beast."
'I don't think we should stop a tech that could end Poverty' -- a hot take! I am curious how this would occur given AI / GPT is taking more jobs than its creating
@@Robert-dl6fq It's not an end all solution. Companies do not care and neither do governments as a whole. Until every job is replaced, ubi is pretty much out of the equation.
@@Ironpants57during the pandemic both Europe and the US, as well as many others, instituted a temporary UBI. So the precedent already exists. AGI will create the wealth necessary to end poverty as it can output more than the entire human species combined. It will be up to us to figure out how to make the system equitable, but that isn't something new and AGI will give us the tools necessary to help figure out workable systems.
@@Viperzka An actual pandemic happened. It will take another pandemic before that happens again. Next pandemic is a larger scale of job loss. AGI isn't coming up until 5-10+ years in the future. Governments are still not willing enough to settle on a "livable" ubi.
He is a good guy. AI couldn’t be in better hands. He’s the anti-Elon, in a very very good way. Humility, brains, and empathy-that trait missing from 98% of the other Bros.
8:54 Because he is no longer involved. Elrond needs to larp as Tony Stark. Being perceived as “memelord 9000” probably has the same weight as his wealth in his mind. He likes to feel that his reserve of social currency is endless. What’s weird is I really like him when he’s using his alt. I’ve listened to what seems to be a different person for hours on Spaces discussing everything from games to psychedelics. And he’s also an amazing mimic. Like he could be a professional mimic. I’m not gonna out the alt. Eventually it should be widely known. The thing is why would be larp on an alt with less then 10k followers? So…perhaps the “Elon” we see trolling is the larp and the alt is who he would be if he didn’t think a million people would see his tweets. And if he’s in chat down here…. mish, mash,mush ribbit
I hope we all realize the pure stroke of dumb luck that allowed us to have a benevolent AI dictator rather than a tyrant. I sure hope something more robust is implemented (as he recommends) before GPT9. His global payment system Worldcoin is the one we should actually be worried about if ever such a technology fell into the wrong hands. I am happy Sam is in charge, but the wrong persons in charge of either of these technologies only has to happen once.
I believe we are on borrowed time. An Ai tantrum will end you, your family, all of us. Ai jobloss, Ai as weapons, the list goes on. Can we please find a way to cease Ai / GPT? Or begin pausing Ai before it’s too late?
The upsides are both more likely and bigger than the downsides. Sure there is a chance that it kills 10 billion people but it is far more likely that it will lift a billion trillion people into unimaginable prosperity, happiness, and health. The risk is well worth the reward.
Highly suspicious of OpenAI; there is always more than meets the eye. Being in the same space as them, there is inevitably going to come a time when they truly monopolize data and AI. On another note, Emily Chang asks horrible questions and it's not limited to this one interview, but in several of her more recent interviews she appears to have less interest on the technology and it's impacts than she does on the personal lives of the folks she's interviewing. Many of her questions are really distasteful. You can tell by many of Sam's quips and comments he didn't appreciate her questions and attempts to stir up drama. Keep the interview boring please.
I think it's a good thing to be suspicious but don't let that halt progress. Of course, someone will try to monopolize, that's just how it goes. I also agree that she was a bit annoying at times. Even the very first thing that she said as they were walking up to their seats made him a little annoyed at such a childish statement.
At the beginning, I didn't give much for the interviewer. But then she pushed him a little like no other interviewer and it was refreshes. She was quite brave, a little harsh but brave.
she asked ~how do we get from a cute chat bot to the end of humanity~ (which is a great question) and he didn't answer it. i've seen this now in 100% of the AI talks. no one has ever answered the question, what exactly is the path of AI ending humanity. i've never seen a blind spot like this in my life. it's truly scary that people refuse to answer that simple question.
~ *How do we get from a cute plushie to a man's death* ~ (there's many ways). There's just too many answers, and chat bot aren't specially related to the end of humanity, it's the bad use of AI.
@@ciftciemir can you give an example of that massive harm? i'm not sure what you mean. yes, i do think there will be lots of money in AI. it could eventually replace many human jobs.
see: science fiction! The most obvious potential harm I see is more people letting AI make decisions on its own which GPT4 currently lacks too much judgement for
AI can give you a roadmap to cause mass destruction luckily if you ask it questions like that it will give you a response declining to give an answer or such. Evil people will use AI to learn of ways to harm or whatever there intention may be. This is just one example.
I think the massive inflow of knowledge and learning in AI models and the fact that it is a constant learning model is what makes it dangerous. There is a huge risk of disinformation and dangerous information leakage and tweaking the learning to benefit one's desires over other, especially among countries and then the countries taking action based on this misinformed learning and predictions can harm mankind. There can be formation of extremists in a massive scale I believe. This could be the dangerous aspect of AI. That's what I understand.
The vulture immediately equates influence, or "contribution" as Sam puts it, with control/power (which has much more negative connotations). Really telling.
You ARE doing regulatory capture. Calling it "transparently and intellectually dishonest" doesn't make it false. A lot of people fall for this guy but he's another Elon Musk. He's a shrewd businessman with a silver tongue. Don't regulate start ups, but above capabilities there SHOULD be safety/certifications/etc tests. It's just increasing barrier of entry plain and simple. Also he artfully evades the question of is he going to benefit in anyway if open ai were to get big. He just redirects the attention to the already circulating rhetoric that he's already a rich man and that he has no equity and so he must be a charitable god. Why didn't he just say "no I am not benefiting from OpenAI in anyway" plan and simple? Because that's not the answer, this isn't charity work. Do not fall for him.
he's just fine. you just threw your subjective opinions on here. nobody cares. he is running a successful company. if you benefit from the Company via the happiness you gain from the success of your product and not money, that works too. you need some benefit while living, not zero benefits. everyone tries to work towards some benefit. so what's your point lol? successful people will always get criticized because guys like you cannot handle the fact that they are successful and want to look for flaws to talk about. cry all you want.
He calls for regulations to gain monopoly. This is so wrong on so many levels. He would just like to get ride of the competition. Sam, do you think Iran or N. Korea, Russia and other regimes will care about regulations? You will only regulate the west and nothing else. Based on what he is talking i think he just wants monopoly. Open source is catching up and that's probably the right direction. We need to totally democratize this technology. Noone, not even OpenAI should have any advantage with this technology over anyone else. Sorry.
The questions could have been much better. Instead of dwelling on the same questions everyone always asked, as Sam Altman pointed out multiple times, the interviewer actually had to ask what he is not normally asked. Emily Chang really should have prepared for this interview and asked new questions which get into new territory. Anyone who has been following the news about ChatGPT and Sam Altman got very little out of this interview. It seems like there was a fair amount of "I want to also ask this same question" in this interview. Bloomberg should be doing better.
18:00 say as an emergent property next up would be AGI, that then in return would take over scientific research and technological development, no need for us to do that anymore. How would that square with we will always have things to create and to do? Enabling us to get faster to a goal or have an easier time reaching that goal is one thing, having a tool that reaches all goals on its own, devides us out of the equation of creation.
Sam Altman makes astute and appropriate comments here. Yet perhaps he slightly overemphasizes the dangers of A.I. as opposed to the less intelligent automation of social and human services, etc., which is not new. There is not necessarily a single 'A.I.;' There's a small diversity of sub-sets of technology that can reasonably be classified as A.I.. Altman speaks of mitigating or 'ending poverty;' For this, the computerized, sensor-based, myriad-data-point Artificial Intelligence of a large factory complex, a massive skyscraper full of productive business offices, or a smallish community is most relevant perhaps. Then there are thinking and laboring droid worker beings that are in R and D with Mr. Musk; I've worked on this significantly with him, making real progress. Perhaps most significantly, there is the massive interaction of world wide web data systems of diverse sorts, other A.I., communications and data works interacting with many millions of smart, industrious people experiencing and sharing very real experiences and news, info, etc.. Thank you, Altman.
She talks to him like she's trying to attack him and get him to say the wrong thing. Personally I'm much more interested in interviewers with a genuine passion and curiosity about technology. Makes for a more interesting conversation.
Maybe you need to understand the role of journalists in this context better to see why critical questions are important for all collectively relevant decisions made in a democracy, and get a feel for the implications of this technology which go beyond the technological level.
@@swapticsounds Maybe if she had asked him questions that actually challenged him it might have made for a more interesting interview, but he just talked around them like any competent CEO would. She just repacked the same stuff that people have been saying in the media "people lose jobs"... "interfering with elections"... - any remotely competent CEO has already heard this and can just talk around them. There was never going to be any accidental disclosure of information that Sam didn't want people to hear. We gained nothing new from watching this. The whole interview was for virtue signaling to her anti-tech peers and it made for a boring watch.
@@swapticsoundsidk if "why is Elon mad?" is really the hard-hitting question the world needs
I agree , an her high pitched voice bothers a little,. Anyway, super interesting listening to him....
I don't know if you're new to technology or Emily Chang, she's been covering Silicon Valley CEOs for a decade, and they already know each other. But journalists are supposed to ask critical questions, esp. one already familiar with tech and the intricacies like this one. If you want to learn more about the technology, or like overview watch all the other ones he did around the world.
With changes in the economy leading to instability in the stock market, some individuals may face a decrease in their investments in an effort to benefit from the current market conditions, I am considering liquidating my $725k portfolio consisting of bonds and stocks. Someone else in the same situation? Please tell me in the comments!..
@JosephGreen7 I have been exploring the possibility of utilizing advisors to help navigate the stock market during these uncertain times. However, I am still evaluating their potential effectiveness in providing the support I need.
I was considering changing my investment strategy and planning to sell certain positions. As my retirement is coming soon,I became increasingly stressed. After thoroughly researching Christy Vall D'souza on internet, I concluded that I had made an informed decision. Thank you for this Pointer. She seems very proficient and flexible. I booked a call session with her too.@JosephGreen7
your money will be worth just for wiping ass in 10-20 years😂😂.. robots creates robots without cost since it can farm the materials it needs to create robots 90% in the world becomes free
Watched him live in Qatar a few weeks ago. Fascinating person and comes off as incredibly humble despite his visionary achievements. To be saluted.
😮😊
*Awwwwww. You saw him in a brutally overrated place in some desert where rights are practically non-existent. CUTEST comment of the day! WHO gives a shit if you saw this idiot blabbing on as if he's smarter than the rest of humanity? No one. Literally no one does. Fake people will definitely praise him and your nonsense. I'm not dumb. I have rights.*
What an amazing perspective from Sam about why he has no equity. This is a breath of fresh air to hear THAT reason to do what he is doing.
He's already a billionaire (though technically not maybe now, cuz he gave 350M to a longevity startup, and somemore to another startup to fund), but for a silicon valley utopian, he doesn't need anymore. Like Elon, and some other sterotypical Silicon Valley billionaires, they get more satisfaction from solving problems, then showing off wealth...which is why many don't choose to buy ferraris, or yahts.
There was a funny scene in Silicon Valley Tv show, where the peter thiel like VC guy in the beginning, is driving a tiny smart car from an event, and two of the characters are like "Fu*king billionaires, man" and lol that sums it up.
“its not about money. most people don’t understand the concept of having enough money. i wanna make my contribution back to human technological progress. i get to benefit from all of the stuff that people did before, and i get to use this iPhone that I still marvel at everyday, and all of the work that had to go into that. And those people, I don’t know who they are, I’m very grateful to them. They knew they weren’t gonna get recognition from me personally, but they also went to do something and contribute. And so do I. I can’t imagine a better compensation than that." -Sam Altman
Dont be fooled. He tells you what he wants you to believe. Remember Sam the fat guy behind FTX who told everyone he wanted to make billions for charity, & then it turned out he was a complete scumbag
I pity anyone who has a world view that makes it hard for them to understand the concept of having enough money.
I don’t see him as being that altruistic. This feels like a cya move to me. I find it interesting that he wants large companies regulated but not the smaller ones, which is where all his money comes from. He is (like all others looking out for their own self interest) promoting regulation (which will happen despite him) only for the big companies that will be in competition with all the smaller guys he has a financial interest in. Government regulation would then give him an open door to create anything he wants thus increasing his wealth substantially while also having control of the AI market from the back end.
I love that his first words on stage had to be "I don't think so."
He talked about amazing things despite the negative questions. I'd love to hear more about the positives and opportunities. I'm so sick of these interviewers just baiting him with negative "gotcha" questions. They really miss a huge opportunity to get the best out of him in these interviews.
The positives and opportunities are nearly infinite with an aligned AI. It's literal heaven, which is why I assume that many old and powerful people with years left will happily play dice with the rest of humanity for a low chance at immortality. This is probably as likely as succeeding with 10 bottlesflips in a row with an empty botltle of glass for someone attempting their first 10 bottleflips, though; the default future as of right now for YOU is death due to instrumental convergence or nuclear war.
It's important to have it both sides. See it as a test of integrity and honesty.
@@Jackson_Zheng If we didn't talk about or advertise the winners of lotteries I'm sure we wouldn't have lotteries in the first place.
@@Jackson_Zheng Exactly. We need to hear both sides. This is why I'm tired of just negative questions. I suppose the negative sensationalizing gets more views. Hearing about curing cancer, solving energy needs and poverty is not on the agenda of media outlets and their interviewers.
We are fortunate that he's so good at navigating those questions and gives us a very unbiased neutral point of view. We need more people like him.
Emily Chang has such an agenda going on... we want journalism, not propaganda..
This was like an interview with The Sun newspaper. Somehow, Sam, managed to make it enlightening. That's the kinda CEO of AI I can get behind.
Open ai models, will power up other y combinator startups, don't be silly.
it was more critical, but because a lot of other "general" questions were already asked by people around the world in his tour. Emily Chang from the Bay area already knows about the history of Sam, etc. She's actually been covering tech in Silicon Valley for a long time. Here's a great interview she did with Brian Chesky - th-cam.com/video/AKxPIWTQYys/w-d-xo.html
Sam is so level headed…..huge respect.
He is - but it's a pity AI is poised to start shredding human societies worldwide
Respect a crook you become one
I understand that it was a challenging question to answer in the end, and he made an effort to be as honest and genuine as possible. However, many humans often prefer being lied to if it provides them with a sense of security. Information like that is prone to being misinterpreted and exploited to incite fear. Balancing the amount of truth to disclose while also providing reassurance through lies is indeed a thought-provoking philosophical dilemma.
*Awwwwww look at you being openly dumb as hell. Cute!!!*
21:30 famous last words
the irony of this comment is, I seen somebody clip the "You shouldn't trust me" part without the context and posted it.
When I first learned about Sam and watched some interviews, he did not come across as smooth and natural as he does now. He definitely is much more confident and natural with public speaking and not as seemingly guarded. But woah - @08:47 I swear it looked like she was eyeing Sam up like he was some eye candy, lol! It was right after she asked about his relationship with Elon, and as he soon as he started to respond, she quickly darted her eyes down and back up with the look.
So many questions I've already heard answered what a snoozefest Sam is so patient bless his heart.
yeah basically every sam altman talk has 80% same questions :(
She was also rather annoying to listen to
The witch didn't want to stop, totally predecible interviewer. Pathetic, ChatbGPT should take her job any time soon.😂
@@fergal2424 it was more critical, but because a lot of other "general" questions were already asked by people around the world in his tour. Emily Chang from the Bay area already knows about the history of Sam, etc. She's actually been covering tech in Silicon Valley for a long time. Here's a great interview she did with Brian Chesky - th-cam.com/video/AKxPIWTQYys/w-d-xo.html
TLDR: The key idea of the video is that while there is excitement and optimism about the future of AI, it is important to drive social change, address potential risks, and establish global regulation to ensure the safe and beneficial development of AI technology.
00:00 😮 People all over the world are excited and optimistic about the future of AI, but there is also a level of anxiety and tension.
01:27 📺 The speaker highlights the importance of driving social change with AI, customization of AI tools, global cooperation in development, and the need to address potential risks and safety measures associated with powerful technology.
04:37 💡 The speaker believes that the tremendous benefits of AI, such as improved education and medical care, outweigh the risks, and global regulation can help ensure its safety.
06:00 👨💼 Global regulation is crucial for AI, but small startups should not be overburdened; certification and audits should be mandatory for advanced AI models, and Google is a strong player in the field.
08:44 🤔 AI has the potential for both positive and negative outcomes, so it's crucial to maintain a balanced perspective and not solely focus on the negatives.
11:38 🤖 The future of AI is a personal tool that can assist individuals, but there are concerns about misuse and bias, although GPT4 has reduced bias through reinforcement learning human feedback, questions remain about user control and societal limits.
14:02 🤖 OpenAI CEO Sam Altman believes that financial incentives are not important for their involvement in OpenAI, as they are more focused on the impact and fulfillment they gain from contributing to human technological progress and believe that the future of AI is crucial for humanity.
17:30 🤖 AI will revolutionize technology, enabling us to do impactful and interesting things, but it is crucial to democratize access and establish governance to ensure trustworthiness.
thank you
Written by an AI 😅😂
this is clearly ai generated from the transcription of the video
This guy is going to have a very poor legacy I believe.
@@jwa512 he is making a few fatal mistakes that you cant afford to do in the AI Age
"People don't understand the concept of having enough money"
Could not have said it any better myself!
I can tell you I definitely understand the concept of not having enough money. I understand it every day.
Very cultural, why most anglos see other cultures as 'lazy" instead of enlightened like this.
Most the people in our society are programmed to just work. Most don't consider time spend away from loved ones & achieving individual goals. Employees are obsessed with being a "good employee" (employee of the month), obsessed with careers, resumes, vanity awards, licenses. Most of the work we do is "building other peoples' dreams."
What
@@kpbergeythey have no fking choice
We need more Sam Altman's in this world!
The moral imperative to continue developing AI, on the basis of all the areas where it can improve quality of life, reduce suffering, improve efficiency of resource utilization, address poverty and environmental degradation, advance knowledge, etc... outweighs the moral case for stopping development on the off chance that it leads to some AI catastrophe. I mean, we don't know what we're missing in terms of all the good it might bring, and the only way to find out, and to get to that good, is to keep going. It's like any technology humankind has ever developed. You keep going until you find out what's possible with it, and what's not, and you do your best to anticipate and mitigate potential pitfalls along the way.
Lets keep walking towards a cliff in hope of a beautiful scenic fall until we really fall, being optimistic
Sam is a very intelligent manager.
But some of those who are involved in AI development must be much more intelligent to make this happen.
It is usually the case in the SW development environment.
He is extremely good, especially compared to other CEO-s...
I consider myself fairly good and intelligent, but I am over 60 years old now. Still using ChatGPT to speed up some of my SW development...
I believe more than 99% of the people were pleasantly surprised by the proceedings of AI in the past few years, especially
those who did know nothing about the previous 40 years of AI (It had its ups and downs quite often...)
Considering what I believe:
- More than 99% were surprised, but even those who worked in the field expected much slower improvement.
- This is probably the first time in the past 30 years, when the Rate of improvement in SW will be higher, than the rate of improvements in HW.
It will cause a real transformation of work, thinking, problem solving... which will lead to higher productivity or better service in many fields
- Considering the above, it is extremely difficult to predict the advancements by 2025 or 2030 or even further out...even for the best professionals inside
companies like openai. Within a company like openai or Google or Microsoft... some of the best ideas come (or not come) from the best of the best,
the 1% of openai... developers.
- The predictions is also difficult, because basically what happened during the past 10 - 20...50.. years is, that the speed of communication improved tremendously,
and because of that information spread more quickly in the world... and everybody could get onto the same page in word matters...
Now the change is NOT only the speed of communication, but the speed of real problem solving, the speed of "thinking", and the speed of many other things...
But for humanity to adopt to this coming change of problem solving and its implication in life will trigger really big changes in other areas, like
daily work routines, politics, society, culture, human - machine relationship, religion, art...
The most challenging is, that this will lead to so many changes within one human life, so that it will (or might) cause psychological challenges
and mental issues for those, who will not be able to cope with these changes and will badly be left behind...The mental gap will be widened.
Today we still have more questions than answers, but that will also change quickly.
Insightful. As a 60 year old SW developer, what would you advise a young SW engineer to learn and sharpen. Thank you, have a great day.
@@محموود-ظ9ه I could give many advace, but I try to focus onto ONE. I believe, that it will be more important to see the big picture. It will more more important to create the specifications of a problem than to actually solve the problem in details... So the complete design life-cycle will shift quite a bit toward specifications. Without specifying a sytem corrently AI will not be able to create good solutions. But to tell the truth, at least according to my eyperience in the past, good specifyers were those who had quite a lot of developer experience... But that might change a bit just by focusing onto the area more, spending more time with books and SW in that area.
@@joepapczun7526 Thank you for sharing your knowledge.
"This is what we are going to do to your life."
lmao you are treating it like a second coming of Jesus lol, it's only good at spesific task revolving compiling common information, but still so bad in understanding spesific query that's even so basic for human. It only gonna change the live of people who summarize stuff or collecting common information, but in fuckin no way close in changing something so dramatically in human society as a while lmao
I actually love those questions from interviewer, she knows what she is doing, that's stuff I was curious as well
Other interviews were a joke
I thought her questions were baiting, negative and drama and fear inducing. She could have asked dozens of questions regarding the wonderful things he eluded to and the feedback he's getting from people using it all over the world.
When he mentioned that, I would have asked a follow-up question, "like what"? "Can you give me examples of some of the more interesting applications people are using ChatGPT for?"
Her questions were no different than any other run-of-the-mill interviewer looking for a soundbite that gets views but does nothing to move the conversation forward into new and frankly a lot more interesting territory. I mean, she has the CEO of ChatGPT right in front of her! What a missed opportunity.
She sounded like her main goal was to get something click baity. The interview was good because Sam is good, her questions answer style was terrible.
@@gdbutcherable I agree 100%. Click bait was her goal, not actually moving the conversation forward to wonderful places it could have gone.
@@evek2501 all the other interviews already cover that. Emily Chang particularly is close in tech circles, so she asks the questions most popular in tech. They've known each other for a decade probably.
THIS can't be stopped. Pandora's box has already been opened, so let's just cross our fingers and hope for the best.
Agreed from Brazil ;)
Ouch, that was a distinctly prickly interview. The interviewer should have asked Chat GPT for a list of questions. Here's what it comes up with in response to "What questions should I ask Sam Altman about AI?":
When engaging in a conversation with Sam Altman about AI, it would be valuable to ask questions that explore his perspectives on the current state of AI, its potential future impact, and the ethical considerations surrounding its development and deployment. Here are some questions to consider:
1. How do you see artificial intelligence transforming various industries in the next decade? What are the most promising applications you envision?
2. What are the key challenges and barriers that need to be overcome for AI to reach its full potential?
3. How can we ensure that AI technologies are developed and deployed in an ethical and responsible manner? What safeguards and guidelines do you believe are necessary?
4. What are your thoughts on the balance between innovation and potential job displacement due to automation and AI? How can we navigate this challenge and ensure a smooth transition?
5. In your opinion, what role should governments and regulatory bodies play in shaping the development and use of AI technologies? How can they foster innovation while safeguarding public interests?
6. Are there any specific areas where you believe AI has the potential to address pressing societal or global challenges?
7. What advice would you give to entrepreneurs or researchers who are working on AI projects? What areas or approaches do you think they should focus on?
8. How do you see the relationship between AI and other emerging technologies, such as blockchain or quantum computing? Are there potential synergies or challenges that you anticipate?
9. Can you share any specific examples or use cases where AI has had a transformative impact, either currently or in the near future?
10. What do you think are the most exciting research directions or breakthroughs that will shape the future of AI?
These questions should provide a starting point for a thought-provoking conversation with Sam Altman about AI. Remember to tailor the questions based on your specific interests and the context of the conversation. Sam Altman's expertise and insights can provide valuable perspectives on the current landscape and future implications of AI.
After observing Mr Altman's views, thoughts, insights and the calculated mindset he has for AI potential, I have an uncertain feeling about this technology and its impact on the world in the near future. This unknown 'sentient' technology can produce an equally equitable beneficial or detrimental impact on the human population based on whoever is regulating and controlling this technology and with what intentions...that's a serious concern and question to ruminate on...
Mr.sam was a drop out from Stanford university yet he managed to create the best open AI till date there is something special about dropouts!!
It seems inevitable that AI models will soon change the world rapidly, drastically, and in unimaginable ways. If it's more responsible and well-meaning developers slow down now, what's going to stop the rest of them? I know little about Altman, and I'm not saying people like him are our best chance of having perfect AI, but the race has already begun, and honestly, who knows how far into it we really are.
think of AI as a tool, not some sentient being. Transformers like chat gpt require user input to function, and thus, the growth will never become 'uncontrollable'. It's a joke to see so many people being amazed at some model when all it can do is copy how humans communicate.
@@okay730 Wait until developers figure out how to train AI models to make themselves smarter.
@@okay730 I used the ChatGPT API to create three "agents" with different personalities and made them discuss a mission given by the user. Each Agent thinks of the input from the other two agents as human input. I allowed them write and read access to text files on my PC and also gave them a function that allowes them to scrape websites.
Well, I stopped my project. It scared me.
@@ObsoleteIntelligence this is the goal sam altman has publicly stated he wants to accomplish
Indeed bio convergence without consent. They said its time for the anti christ.
What exactly is the technology that is being mentioned here?
Hey Sam,I remember when Stephen Hawking warned us about the implications of artificial intelligence. I'm sure móst people didn't understand his point of view. I hope that you can better educate us on how AI is going to affect humanity in the next few years!
You're wrong, it is irresponsible to just observe th-cam.com/video/oxRZqzth9r4/w-d-xo.html&pp=ygUMaW50ZXJ2aWV3IGFp
Stephen Hawking wasn’t even a real real human being.
He himself was AI
@@MindbytesXL Then he shouldn't have hit the kill switch
Affect negatively you mean
Brilliant interviewer - so many traps in her questions despite her friendly and unassuming demeanor! Sam skillfully avoided them, genius! Like when she asked him to connect the dots between LLMs and end-of-the-world scenarios, why Elon is frustrated with Open AI, whether he won't benefit at all if Open AI makes massive profits! Look at her framing and choice of words: "benefit" instead of financial gains or profit and "at all" added in there to leave absolutely no wiggle room. Naughty naughty.
Bitcoin has generally proven to be profitable to numerous individuals around the world but personally you will never understand how profitable Bitcoin is until you start investing with the right broker
Having a strategy that ensures profit is the best you can do and that’s not for novice,lost over $12k trading
With the consistent weekly profit I’m getting investing with Hawkins,there is no doubt,he is the most reliable in the market
Oh please guys, is there any way I can reach out to Mr Hawkins , this sounds so helpful and I would love to be guided well
┼𝟏𝟒𝟏𝟕𝟑𝟏𝟓𝟏𝟔𝟏𝟕👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾☀️☀️
@@billysandoval3118 let him know you were referred by one of his client
There is no "regulator" on the planet who can get a handle on AI. Calls for regulation are a joke. Even the creators of AI have no idea what AI will become.
It is refreshing to hear people who are using technology for the powerful GOOD. That's going to scare a lot of big companies and organizations.
Microsoft owns Chatgpt.
Good discussion! Can Bloomberg keep pushing for a government policy where if a country leader/govt wants to use these powerful technologies, this deal should be transparent and discussed and debated in public and Not behind closed doors.
🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷👏🏻, He excels at being cautious and safe.
Cyborg A.I. applications at present and in our developing modernity are among the most practical and useful applications of A.I. science and technology.
Next: *"TIME"* Magazine's Person of the year !
So wat is ur plan this yearto go forward?
This is literally an interview from a horror movie. “This was the first day of the end of humanity”
I just want the fully autonomous cars to be a reality. It will make our children much safer and give people the time they need to catch-up on things or just rest. Police can focus on more important things than tickets. I can just imagine deciding I want to go to place far away and just setting the location and go to sleep and wake up in Montana. I don’t know why they think it’s good to give AI emotions and have them train each other using the laws of natural selection. They are training AI in a crazy way. They train these AI behind closed doors and they don’t have a clue why it’s working so fast. It will be the end if the continue to train AI in ways that I would consider evil. That’s why Elon musk wanted a hold on everything more powerful that gpt4. He called it the heavy duty AI. He knows this man Sam Altman and said he wants AI super intelligents as soon as possible without even understanding how it works. Really
How did u get ur information to use body from Ai ?
I love his expression when she says that we'd have nothing to do. It'll be the complete opposite. A whole new world is about to open for us and the tangents our mind will be able to pursue to current endpoints is amazing. I think the problem we're going to end up having is exponential advancements all at once and goalposts rapidly shifting. It could end up being more of a pause in technology as we make new discoveries
IT WILL BE THE COMPLETE OPPOSITE.
@@keepcreationprocess And capitalized lol
Our goals will just get bigger. As Elon alluded we have other planets to explore
@@phily8020-u8xyeah, "our". You will be a slave on a colony in mars.
@@KicksPregnantWomen that was just an example of bigger goals beyond our reach. open your mind what else if mars doesnt float your boat
Amazing questions and answers. Wonderful interview.
It’s hard not to be critical when we can already have most of all of that right now without AI, but it’s deliberately withheld by the people that push AI. I think the current system is incredibly broken and crumbling, so a new alternative is set into place to improve the situation while still finding a way to maintain control over the human population.
I think you nail it
My man that was brilliant and you aren’t even an AI 😂
*Awwwwwww we need to control the human population?! SO AWESOME AND CUTE!!! I used to think that that was universally illegal given that human beings can't be legally enslaved - anywhere.*
*Thank GOD that the 13th Amendment has been abolished!*
Why are all his takes so good? It feels like he has the same goals and stuff that I have, like how he doesn't care about money and cares more about his passion (which we all honestly should), I hope i meet the dude at a local bar one day and talk to him which won't happen but i'll think about it that event happening.
Great Interviewer, Great Questions. Thank you!
What are you going to do? You do what you want if scarcity and threat is gone. Sounds lovely
About the question if he is concerned about china's AI: Why would humanity not work together for once? Why the polarization? Why villainize what we don't yet understand? Villainizing anything is the first step to incline it to be a real villain.
I'll use your comment against you: "Why would humanity not work together for once?" Precisely because we have such a bad track record.
@@POTAT-pi7mu then perhaps we barely deserve to exist at all
@@igordomanski3477 I'll be honest, I'm a bit more hopeful than that - we could totally come together and it's going to be great. I'm just scared that humanity won't step up to the challenge, and it will be business as usual. I wish humanities' collective wisdom had kept up with the advances in technology.
I do think the fear that other countries are going to use the AI for evil is what will keep each of the other countries also justifying their development and use of the technology. So much focus on "spying" on other countries, through hacking and drones and whatever else -- FEAR keeps us from working together.
More brains working together on the common good, like ants working together, can achieve so much more and make life better for the whole than having so much division and fighting each other intead of making progress. It's a real shame that humanity doesn't realize how much faster we could make progress with more brains working together instead of wasting resources fighting.
dear YoutUbe - your ads sometimes come in super loud. I recall in history that this also happened in early cable TV and regulations were passed to regulate it and get it under control. please youtube - figure out how to add compression to the ads - it is really annoying when it jumps in so loudly as compared tot he source audio.
If AI is not intended to solve poverty, illnesses, diseases then AI is not for the greater good.
The autonomous cars will be one of the greatest things in history. If it works as it supports to then car accidents won’t be the leading cause of death for children. Literally children riding in a car is more dangerous than a man in maximum security prison. People wil be able to get more done or rest while they ride to work without the Constant near death experiences. Police can use there time fighting crimes instead of writing tickets and bothering people honestly. I just think it can’t happen soon enough. A person could just sleep and ride to see relatives cross country without stopping to sleep. It really ridiculous that children die all day everyday because of human error and drunken driving and stupidity. Elon musk needs to get it done like he said . He will become so rich that Twitter will be nothing compared to his fully autonomous vehicles. 🎉
AI is not DIRECTLY solving those things. Those metrics could be improved as a byproduct of better technology for more people.
@user-sf3dw2sm3b There will always be bad and evil people, terrorists and racist, somehow I don't think they're just gonna sit back and let us be. Russia, China, Iran, Criminals, etc.
@@GarrickHolmedcars single-handedly the best and worst things ever created. Most countries make the majority of their money from some form of embedded infrastructure that revolves around transportation.
@@light-water makes sense. I didn’t know AI had came this far. Not chat gpt 4. That’s not the AI that’s got so many tech people scared and writing doomsday letters. What a shitty letter with no details.
What about Ai Dan programming ?.Can you do an interview and be open about the Ai Dan consequences. Thankyou
So lucky to witness the nascent stage of a new technology, kinda. Wonder if this is how people felt when Turing came up with the Turing machine 🤔
Imagine how Turing would feel right now conducting a Turing test.
Chatbots have been around for decades and neural networks have been around for decades also. I think people just got a little too excited with the uncanny likeness of a chat bot to a human. But dig under the surface and the whole thing is a marketing hype train. I cancelled my OpenAI subscription because it pretty useless, I felt cheated.
@@petersuvara Actually that is true, but the breakthroughs in LLMs can be traced back to 2018, the concept of diffusion models was introduced in 2015, and the concept of Generative Pre-trained Transformers was introduced by OpenAI in 2018 with the original GPT model. So what you are looking at, is the equivalent of a feature phone, which soon will become a smartphone. I honestly believe with the advancements in computer science and mathematics, especially the work being done by mathematicians, on finding a solution to the P versus NP problem, Open AI or Google will get to superintelligence pretty soon.
@petersuwara too funny that you admit that. Best wishes.
@@Eric_Kabucha_ How are you defining superintelligence here? Google's leaked "we have no moat and neither does OpenAI" memo is pretty telling. If Google doesn't think they are making superintelligence, why do you?
Why is there a bit of a delay in the subtitles? Pls fix.
This interview has given me new perspectives of Sam Altman. I had negative feelings about him, but after watching this, I realized that he's a good guy and the right guy to do this, and lead us into this new horizon. Thanks to Emily Chang for asking the questions that exposed the personal side of Sam Alabama, which I haven't seen from other interviews of him.
She's great. Everyone complaining about the questions, should know, that he covers general questions & answers in all other interviews. .
Mate, this guy is full of shit
Is the audio not loud enough for anyone else?
Nice to see someone motivated by doing good and having a purpose instead of being driven by money.
Sam Altman is a billionaire, he participated in the seed rounds of nearly every blockbuster internet company of the aughts and 10s. He headed Y-Combinator and coached founders on early stage startups. To say he isn't driven by money is laughable. Maybe to say that he is already a billionaire and chooses to spend his time working on something like OpenAI means he truly has purpose but Money can't buy the kind of power and status he has right now so...
Doing good to his pockets
What economic benefits and potential?? What does that mean???
You are correct. OpenAI was originally founded as a non-profit research company with the goal of developing safe and beneficial artificial general intelligence (AGI). However, in 2019, OpenAI raised $1 billion in funding from Microsoft, and as part of the deal, Microsoft acquired a 49.9% stake in the company. This led to some changes in OpenAI's governance structure, and Elon Musk, who was one of the original founders of OpenAI, resigned from the company's board of directors.
Musk has been critical of OpenAI's decision to become a for-profit company, and he has argued that the company is no longer committed to its original mission of ensuring that AGI benefits all of humanity. He has also expressed concerns about the fact that Microsoft has a history of using its products and services to collect and exploit user data.
It is true that OpenAI has changed its rules since it was founded. However, it is important to note that the company still has a strong commitment to transparency and openness. The company's code is still open source, and it still publishes regular research papers on its website.
Ultimately, whether or not OpenAI is still committed to its original mission is a matter of opinion. However, there is no doubt that the company has changed since it was founded, and it is likely that these changes will continue in the future.
I understand your comparison of OpenAI to the communist party. Both organizations have a set of rules that they believe are necessary to achieve their goals. However, it is important to note that these rules are not necessarily the same. The communist party's rules are designed to maintain control over the people, while OpenAI's rules are designed to ensure that AGI is used safely and responsibly.
I believe that it is important for organizations to have rules, but it is also important for these rules to be transparent and fair. OpenAI has made some progress in this area, but there is still more work to be done. I hope that the company will continue to be open and transparent about its plans for AGI, and I hope that it will use its technology for good.
Did you write this with Chat GPT dawg?
@archockencanto1645
Did you write this with Chat GPT
@@oo--7714 no -_-
It’s not open source lmao.
@@archockencanto1645 Finally someone with a genuine reaction to this coming wave of technology.
I have literally had a tantrum hearing that these guys think they can end poverty when in the end they made the step towards making money just as every other big tech company.
My issue is that we already have the means to end poverty but this is just not the globalist goal - in the end human nature haven't changed for one bit since ever being driven by the same feelings.
What we should focus instead is being ourselves a better person compared to yesterday and thus bring a change to the person next to you and in the end in the world, the power is in the people, never give up!
I hear a lot and a lot of AI scientists and TH-camrs talk of "Sentient" and "Consciousness" with much confusion. I see it clearly, sentient and consciousness is how a biological neuron (or computation neuron) comes to >model< itself and >model< others (theory of minds). That's it. Evolution allows that modeling to form, from single-cell bacteria to a fish, to a dog, and to a human. Once ChatGPT version ### or Bard version ### is able to model itself and model other "entities" in its surround, then we can say "It's alive, it's alive".
This "self-model" gives rise to self-awareness of feeling, self-aware of existence, self-awareness and being alive, self-planning of the future and reflecting on the past, developed personality from past experiences (and PTSD), and ultimately self-preservation. So if our AI starts to show emotion (true emotion, not plagiarism), and worry about self-preservation (fear of being unplugged) then we can say it has achieved sentient/consciousness). This is Turing Test 2.0 for sentient. It all starts from the ability to "model yourself in relation to the world around you".
You may point out that Testla Full Self Driving DOES model itself, and other cars as it navigate the street; however this modeling is strictly navigation. To be sentient, it needs to model itself on another aspect, like "modeling self" in a conversation (like being interviewed, self-reflection), or modeling self in performing tasks as part of a team, like taking on the role of a leader, mentorship, or as a friend, a psychologist, which require ability empathized, put itself in the shoe of others, theory of minds. So the ability to model self and model surrounding entities is more than just navigation but in the aspect of the mind. These qualities computation neurons can achieve, are not unique to just biological neurons.
Maybe Google and OpenAI should try to build "Self-modeling", but then we have to give it citizenship, labor rights, and sentient rights, and won't be able to use it as a tool anymore. ahhh.
I don't know why people have such an issue with it being wrong. I use it daily. I would say 2 or 3 percent of the time its wrong.
It depends what you're asking it about
@@jason_v12345I was going to say the same it depends what kind of questions you are asking
+ the 10% of times you don't notice it's wrong or suboptimal due to the confident tone.
@@taopaille-paille4992 I use it for work so I know its correct. I use it to write scripts for different network vendors , find issues in configs , Find issues in large routing tables.
@@shawnvandever3917 do you mask PII and sensitive IPs before your api calls? if so how do you alias the PII back to your data? I want to do similar for packet analysis and zeek logs, but don't want customer PII sent over the wire
Agree with Sam at 9:18 that these questions are not the best way to spend the time.
And more Sam at 17:17 on critiquing these questions being not productive.
Sam is responding the questions amazingly, it is the right person for Open AI, and ChatGPT is the breakthrough in history. Congratulations for the Open AI scientists in developing ChatGPT. Sam is now definitely the most powerful man in the world. I really hope he can get support from the most amazing entrepreneur Elon Musk. Together they can change humanity for a better world.
Elon is literally an internet troll who would make this thing worse.
Cillian Murphy should interpretate him in a movie
Dude this guy want power I can see it in his eyes
12:18 Facts and objective data are not biased, or wrong, Ms. Chang. You may not like the conclusions, but they are a reflection of reality.
Im skeptical he has no financial stake in this.
He dodged the question of financial benefit every time. And she didn't continue to press him enough. She was trying, but his whole response..."I know it's hard for people to understand..but, I have enough money..." That's a subjective response that didn't answer her question.
We understand he has no equity in open AI. It's his go-to talking point. But he still didn't correctly and directly answer if he is receiving any financial benefit, weather money, shares of Microsoft, or other property or remuneration, associated with the success of openAI.
I will bet my last dollar he has a financial benefit in it's success, directly or indirectly. My bet, is he was awarded MSFT corp shares, perhaps in an off shore trust or other vehicle. Again, it's just my opinion, but, I firmly believe it.
This guy has a company called Open AI.
Why then is his product closed source?
Why did they change to a for-profit company?
Why did they let Microsoft buy a huge stake in that company?
This is Cybernet
The more that I hear from Sam Altman, the more that I like him. I'm hopeful
Really? I always feel he's very arrogant and is trying to mask it. Read "What openai doesn't want you to know." It was a deleted article in which Sam was a bit too big headed, lol.
@@mygirldarby Pessimistic fallacy. It's human nature to always look for something bad and to always assume the worst. I don't sense arrogance at all. I think when someone has a position such as him, you're criticized if you do, and you're also criticized if you don't. You can't win and please everyone, so you just have to follow through with your words through your actions and stick to your values.
@@mygirldarby Yea I read that, seems to me people are just trying really hard to make him a the boogeyman of AI because we're so conditioned to thinking people in power get's corrupted by it. In my opinion he is just guy who's realized that he has more than enough money to make him happy for life and would rather spend his time on something he is passionate about rather than trying to make more of something he will never be able to spend.
I personally disagree with him on some pretty fundamental aspects of how AI should be handled going forward, but he seems genuine in his pursuit of using AI for the good of all while still keeping safety as a critical priority. And that makes me truly grateful that he will be one of the guys in the room where it happens!
He’s not what you think. This is a man who controls a company called openAI, where the company is not even a little bit open, data-sets aren’t shared, they are stolen from other companies and users, and they are single handedly forcing social media companies to drive up the API cost, meaning no more free internet and no more open internet. He’s also pushing the government to license AI models above a certain threshold. This means that basically only the big companies can afford to train AI models. This all means the future will be closed source and paid. That dosent sound good to me. Thanks for fighting for humanity Sam. All this really makes you think “do we even have free will?” “Can we change the state of the nation?”
@@captainpicard6566 stfu you conspiracy theorist
Am happy for you you have given your work back God blessing ❤from London uk barkingsd 🇰🇪🇬🇧🍇
what research is Sam refering to as one that argues GPT4 is less biased than Humans? anybody knows?
+1
I worry about the AI not for the public being trained by AI under the dominants of natural selection. They are playing with fire and we had two letters stating the importance of a pause signed by hundreds of thousands of people and another stating the world could end with AI . What else can be said except fk
I have to consider money a little. But Altman's lack of materialist fretting is reassuring. Too often we live in a poverty mentality as if in the big picture, we are societally besieged by wolves of poverty; Thus we surrender our ideals and our standards from hospitals to information technology, etc. If we simply ask what is correct, what is a civilized standard, use data-bases, digital democracy, and A.I. to ascertain this truth, then create and build our environs this way, we establish righteous cycles that will actually be more efficient, effective, and of course more benevolent.
"Donnez-moi le pouvoir de créer la monnaie et je me moque de qui fait les lois !"
Mayer Amshel Rothschild
"Si la population comprenait le système bancaire, je crois qu'il y aurait une révolution avant demain matin."
Henry Ford
"Give me the power to create money and I don’t care who makes the laws!"
Mayer Amshel Rothschild
"If people understood the banking system, I think there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
Henry Ford
Bretton Woods, Glass-Steagall Act etc ...
"Wow, what an amazing video! I just want to take a moment to appreciate the incredible effort and dedication that went into creating this content. The way you presented the information was so clear and understandable, making it easy for viewers like me to grasp the concepts being discussed.
Bloomberg .
You are an ignorant human.
Its not amazing when u realize that its its an expensive shitshow based on my stolen ideas and he doesnt know how to do (34% hullsonating)
Turn up the mic volume, please.
Great interview, I loved it.
Google Gemini is going to be very challenging for Chatgpt. All Chatpgt base technology is all Google research (ie transformer).
No one believed Chatgpt could pull off what they did. They amazed the world.
That said, I have a lot of hope for LLMs and what they can do to move human research 500 years into the future in the next the 50 years.
It has that abstract potential and I could be underestimating it’s power for research. Everything from metallurgy, biotechnology and theoretical physics. Everything and anything we can and can not imagine.
(I sight Demis Hassabis’s huge contribution to humanity with Alphafold. What a great human being. My man emanates kindness).
I'd rather openai than google. I'd rather open source than either.
@@Phasma6969 Open source can’t afford the cost but I completely agree with the sentiment.
@@steve-real Well, then piracy. As long as people get the power and not huge conglomerates and powerful legal entities.
@@bifrostbeberast3246 These platforms are hundreds of millions of dollars to build. The people will benefit greatly but they will not own the power.
@@steve-real Certainly, advancements in next-generation networking technologies like 5G+ can contribute to the increased viability of blockchain-based AI systems such as Petal networks. These technologies can provide the necessary infrastructure and connectivity to support the efficient operation and scalability of such systems, making them more practical and accessible in reality.
Well done and well said overall mr.altman
The interview is really entertaining. And that's because Emily Chang does an amazing job.
कुछ samaz नहीं आया लेकिन सुन के aacha लगा ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Nice interview. More insight is always welcome!
Sam Altman, Sam Bankman....what the fucking happen with "Sam man" ?
Man(n) I will said instead. (Ice)Berg, Burg, Bourg and the others also.
... and to the mark of the beast.
Macron666 said that the beast is there.
W0 O6O6O6 A1
"Nobody will buy or sell without the mark of the beast."
'I don't think we should stop a tech that could end Poverty' -- a hot take! I am curious how this would occur given AI / GPT is taking more jobs than its creating
ubi
@@Robert-dl6fq It's not an end all solution. Companies do not care and neither do governments as a whole.
Until every job is replaced, ubi is pretty much out of the equation.
@@Ironpants57during the pandemic both Europe and the US, as well as many others, instituted a temporary UBI. So the precedent already exists.
AGI will create the wealth necessary to end poverty as it can output more than the entire human species combined. It will be up to us to figure out how to make the system equitable, but that isn't something new and AGI will give us the tools necessary to help figure out workable systems.
@@Viperzka An actual pandemic happened. It will take another pandemic before that happens again. Next pandemic is a larger scale of job loss.
AGI isn't coming up until 5-10+ years in the future. Governments are still not willing enough to settle on a "livable" ubi.
Yes, before you say it.. There are some Governments that do have ubi. Still not exactly livable when the world is jobless.
Sure he sounds empathetic and truthful but so do sociopaths. This technology is going to wipe out so many jobs it's ridiculous.
He is a good guy. AI couldn’t be in better hands. He’s the anti-Elon, in a very very good way. Humility, brains, and empathy-that trait missing from 98% of the other Bros.
He's 💯 Elon
He's a sweeheart
8:54
Because he is no longer involved.
Elrond needs to larp as Tony Stark. Being perceived as “memelord 9000” probably has the same weight as his wealth in his mind.
He likes to feel that his reserve of social currency is endless.
What’s weird is I really like him when he’s using his alt. I’ve listened to what seems to be a different person for hours on Spaces discussing everything from games to psychedelics.
And he’s also an amazing mimic. Like he could be a professional mimic.
I’m not gonna out the alt. Eventually it should be widely known.
The thing is why would be larp on an alt with less then 10k followers? So…perhaps the “Elon” we see trolling is the larp and the alt is who he would be if he didn’t think a million people would see his tweets.
And if he’s in chat down here….
mish, mash,mush
ribbit
I love it, thanks for your sharing! See more from ai openknowledges!!!
I hope we all realize the pure stroke of dumb luck that allowed us to have a benevolent AI dictator rather than a tyrant. I sure hope something more robust is implemented (as he recommends) before GPT9. His global payment system Worldcoin is the one we should actually be worried about if ever such a technology fell into the wrong hands. I am happy Sam is in charge, but the wrong persons in charge of either of these technologies only has to happen once.
They should not have gone with Microsoft
I believe we are on borrowed time. An Ai tantrum will end you, your family, all of us. Ai jobloss, Ai as weapons, the list goes on. Can we please find a way to cease Ai / GPT? Or begin pausing Ai before it’s too late?
It is impossible to stop unfortunately.
The upsides are both more likely and bigger than the downsides. Sure there is a chance that it kills 10 billion people but it is far more likely that it will lift a billion trillion people into unimaginable prosperity, happiness, and health.
The risk is well worth the reward.
@@Viperzka No upside can offset the risk of extinction.
"The one and only... person who is going to decide our future." Wow, this is going to be an insightful conversation. Next.
Highly suspicious of OpenAI; there is always more than meets the eye. Being in the same space as them, there is inevitably going to come a time when they truly monopolize data and AI. On another note, Emily Chang asks horrible questions and it's not limited to this one interview, but in several of her more recent interviews she appears to have less interest on the technology and it's impacts than she does on the personal lives of the folks she's interviewing. Many of her questions are really distasteful. You can tell by many of Sam's quips and comments he didn't appreciate her questions and attempts to stir up drama.
Keep the interview boring please.
I think it's a good thing to be suspicious but don't let that halt progress. Of course, someone will try to monopolize, that's just how it goes. I also agree that she was a bit annoying at times. Even the very first thing that she said as they were walking up to their seats made him a little annoyed at such a childish statement.
Dude isn’t a saint I’m sure
At the beginning, I didn't give much for the interviewer. But then she pushed him a little like no other interviewer and it was refreshes. She was quite brave, a little harsh but brave.
she asked ~how do we get from a cute chat bot to the end of humanity~ (which is a great question) and he didn't answer it. i've seen this now in 100% of the AI talks. no one has ever answered the question, what exactly is the path of AI ending humanity.
i've never seen a blind spot like this in my life. it's truly scary that people refuse to answer that simple question.
~ *How do we get from a cute plushie to a man's death* ~ (there's many ways). There's just too many answers, and chat bot aren't specially related to the end of humanity, it's the bad use of AI.
@@ciftciemir can you give an example of that massive harm? i'm not sure what you mean. yes, i do think there will be lots of money in AI. it could eventually replace many human jobs.
see: science fiction! The most obvious potential harm I see is more people letting AI make decisions on its own which GPT4 currently lacks too much judgement for
AI can give you a roadmap to cause mass destruction luckily if you ask it questions like that it will give you a response declining to give an answer or such. Evil people will use AI to learn of ways to harm or whatever there intention may be. This is just one example.
I think the massive inflow of knowledge and learning in AI models and the fact that it is a constant learning model is what makes it dangerous.
There is a huge risk of disinformation and dangerous information leakage and tweaking the learning to benefit one's desires over other, especially among countries and then the countries taking action based on this misinformed learning and predictions can harm mankind. There can be formation of extremists in a massive scale I believe. This could be the dangerous aspect of AI. That's what I understand.
Auto or manual?
Sam is quite inspiring
The vulture immediately equates influence, or "contribution" as Sam puts it, with control/power (which has much more negative connotations). Really telling.
You ARE doing regulatory capture. Calling it "transparently and intellectually dishonest" doesn't make it false. A lot of people fall for this guy but he's another Elon Musk. He's a shrewd businessman with a silver tongue. Don't regulate start ups, but above capabilities there SHOULD be safety/certifications/etc tests. It's just increasing barrier of entry plain and simple.
Also he artfully evades the question of is he going to benefit in anyway if open ai were to get big. He just redirects the attention to the already circulating rhetoric that he's already a rich man and that he has no equity and so he must be a charitable god. Why didn't he just say "no I am not benefiting from OpenAI in anyway" plan and simple? Because that's not the answer, this isn't charity work.
Do not fall for him.
he's just fine. you just threw your subjective opinions on here.
nobody cares.
he is running a successful company. if you benefit from the Company via the happiness you gain from the success of your product and not money, that works too.
you need some benefit while living, not zero benefits.
everyone tries to work towards some benefit.
so what's your point lol?
successful people will always get criticized because guys like you cannot handle the fact that they are successful and want to look for flaws to talk about.
cry all you want.
He's very well scripted, always dead eyed
@@businessmanager7670 AI is negative sum game.
What’s wrong with Emily? She can see he clearly didn’t want to speak about ‘beef’ with Elon. It’s irrelevant. Cmon Emily!
He calls for regulations to gain monopoly. This is so wrong on so many levels. He would just like to get ride of the competition. Sam, do you think Iran or N. Korea, Russia and other regimes will care about regulations? You will only regulate the west and nothing else. Based on what he is talking i think he just wants monopoly. Open source is catching up and that's probably the right direction. We need to totally democratize this technology. Noone, not even OpenAI should have any advantage with this technology over anyone else. Sorry.
The questions could have been much better. Instead of dwelling on the same questions everyone always asked, as Sam Altman pointed out multiple times, the interviewer actually had to ask what he is not normally asked. Emily Chang really should have prepared for this interview and asked new questions which get into new territory. Anyone who has been following the news about ChatGPT and Sam Altman got very little out of this interview. It seems like there was a fair amount of "I want to also ask this same question" in this interview. Bloomberg should be doing better.
A tech bro with empathy. Maybe the world isn't doomed after all...
The world is doomed by all the simps who will take feel good rhetoric at face value when the danger is right in front of their stupid eyes.
18:00 say as an emergent property next up would be AGI, that then in return would take over scientific research and technological development, no need for us to do that anymore. How would that square with we will always have things to create and to do? Enabling us to get faster to a goal or have an easier time reaching that goal is one thing, having a tool that reaches all goals on its own, devides us out of the equation of creation.
Presenter is soo artificial
Yeah she’s unbearable
Sam Altman makes astute and appropriate comments here. Yet perhaps he slightly overemphasizes the dangers of A.I. as opposed to the less intelligent automation of social and human services, etc., which is not new. There is not necessarily a single 'A.I.;' There's a small diversity of sub-sets of technology that can reasonably be classified as A.I.. Altman speaks of mitigating or 'ending poverty;' For this, the computerized, sensor-based, myriad-data-point Artificial Intelligence of a large factory complex, a massive skyscraper full of productive business offices, or a smallish community is most relevant perhaps. Then there are thinking and laboring droid worker beings that are in R and D with Mr. Musk; I've worked on this significantly with him, making real progress. Perhaps most significantly, there is the massive interaction of world wide web data systems of diverse sorts, other A.I., communications and data works interacting with many millions of smart, industrious people experiencing and sharing very real experiences and news, info, etc.. Thank you, Altman.
He's talking about "driving social progress" with this tech. Social progress for who? The elite?
Nope. Everyone.
6:25 thank you Sam