Thanks Nitesh for your query. In the control plan, there are 2 columns. One is related to Process and the other is related to Product. The column related to Product can be used as reference for Product Audit
Bhavya Mangla Sir : While going for the product audit, from where we need to pick the product samples? Is it mandatory to pick the samples from FG and then do the audit or on every particular station, we shall check the dimensions as per the control plan? Similarly in layout inspection, is it mandatory to pick a part or two from running line or we can get these parts from the previously produced parts?
Product audit has to be conducted at appropriate stages of the production. So pick the samples from appropriate stages. But Product Audit does not mean inspection ( refer blog and video). For layout inspection, sample can be taken from Finished Goods
@@bhavyamangla Thank you so much for the explanation, Sir! Usually in our company, while going for the product audit, we used to take the bin consisting of many parts from FG racks and do the dimensions check as per the control plan and also check the packaging as per the customer approved packaging standard. And while going for the layout inspection, we used to pick a sample from final inspection process (prior to packaging process) and do the complete dimensions and functionality check as per the drawings. So is it the right way of doing the audit and inspection or we need to change the methods of above-mentioned, if any. Love to hear your opinion on this, Sir!
Dear Ajeet, Thanks for your query. Special Characteristics is the requirement of the IATF standard and Control Plan. There are different types of Special characteristics like safety, critical, Major, Minor etc.
Dear Kunal, CAPA is a generic terminology for Corrective And Preventive Action. While 8D is one of the popular methodology, which was initiated by FORD.
@@arunsaini7531Product Audit is clear from the Standard. When we talk about Product, the intent is that after PPAP approval, when we want to requalify the product again, we check all to the dimensions functional tests etc to ensure that product fulfill the requirement. This can be generally done as per customer requirement
IATF IS BEAUTIFUL DOCUMENTED FORM .. BUT PEOPLE MOTIVES IS JUST TO CLEAR AUDITS RATHER THAN IMPLEMENTATION... ANY BODY WHO AUDIT CREATES A PRESSURE JUST FOR AUDIT .. BUT IT SHOULD BE TAKEN AS A LEADERSHIP TO IMPLEMENT..
Dear sir, you are explaining the only difference . I suggest you , make a video on IATF all clause requirements and VDA 6.3 requirements in detail
Thanks for the suggestion. Majority of the IATF clauses have been explained in the last 2 years. For VDA 6.3, hopefully soon.
Dear sir, very excellent explained about the both requirements as per system.🙏🙏
Dear Vivek, Thansk for your response and liking it.
Really good clarification
Thanks Awadesh
Sir kya control plan se product audit ho jayega, please reply
Thanks Nitesh for your query. In the control plan, there are 2 columns. One is related to Process and the other is related to Product. The column related to Product can be used as reference for Product Audit
Thank you very much sir
You are most welcome Devendra
Bhavya Mangla Sir : While going for the product audit, from where we need to pick the product samples? Is it mandatory to pick the samples from FG and then do the audit or on every particular station, we shall check the dimensions as per the control plan? Similarly in layout inspection, is it mandatory to pick a part or two from running line or we can get these parts from the previously produced parts?
Product audit has to be conducted at appropriate stages of the production. So pick the samples from appropriate stages. But Product Audit does not mean inspection ( refer blog and video). For layout inspection, sample can be taken from Finished Goods
@@bhavyamangla Thank you so much for the explanation, Sir!
Usually in our company, while going for the product audit, we used to take the bin consisting of many parts from FG racks and do the dimensions check as per the control plan and also check the packaging as per the customer approved packaging standard.
And while going for the layout inspection, we used to pick a sample from final inspection process (prior to packaging process) and do the complete dimensions and functionality check as per the drawings. So is it the right way of doing the audit and inspection or we need to change the methods of above-mentioned, if any.
Love to hear your opinion on this, Sir!
Sir different between special chareterstic and critical chareterstic in control plan
Dear Ajeet, Thanks for your query. Special Characteristics is the requirement of the IATF standard and Control Plan. There are different types of Special characteristics like safety, critical, Major, Minor etc.
Difference between Layouts Inspection and SIR
Make video on it
Thanks for your suggestion. Hopefully soon
NC ko kaise handle kare
Thanks for your query Saleem. The attached link may help th-cam.com/video/oMvyY6fOubk/w-d-xo.html
Good explain sir.
Thanks Mukul
Sir please explain the key difference between 8D and CAPA?
Dear Kunal, CAPA is a generic terminology for Corrective And Preventive Action. While 8D is one of the popular methodology, which was initiated by FORD.
Well explained.. in simple way.. 👍
Thanks Sanjay
Nice 🙏
Thanks for the Feedback.
Sir function test is the part of product audit not layout inspection
Arun, Thanks for your response. Please see clause 8.6.2 (Layout)
Superb sir
Thanks Donu
Thanks Sonu
Good explanation!!!
Thank You
Sir please share, Difference between inprocess and product audit
Dear Vijay, Thanks for your suggestion. Hopefully soon
SIR WHAT IS THE DIFFRENCE BETWEEN pRODUCT AUDIT AND product qualification
Thanks for the question. In which clause of IATF 16949, there is reference of PRODUCT QUALIFICATION?
FAQ FOR IATF
Sir the word is product requalification and is in FAQ 21
@@arunsaini7531Product Audit is clear from the Standard. When we talk about Product, the intent is that after PPAP approval, when we want to requalify the product again, we check all to the dimensions functional tests etc to ensure that product fulfill the requirement. This can be generally done as per customer requirement
SIR , WHY ANY CERTIFYING BODY FOCUS ON AUDITS RATHER THAN IMPLEMENTATION?
Thanks for the question. Can specify it in more detail to understand
IATF IS BEAUTIFUL DOCUMENTED FORM .. BUT PEOPLE MOTIVES IS JUST TO CLEAR AUDITS RATHER THAN IMPLEMENTATION... ANY BODY WHO AUDIT CREATES A PRESSURE JUST FOR AUDIT .. BUT IT SHOULD BE TAKEN AS A LEADERSHIP TO IMPLEMENT..
@@gurugarg8002 Yes, you are right. A lot depends upon the top management of the organisation. How much importance they give to the management system..