@@GinaBush-gb6tk I'd say the cop just doesn't have experience but was trying to be polite and might even agree with the guys filming even if he works for somebody who tells him to do something else.
In PA a woman here managed to sue in a section 1983 lawsuit in an individual capacity instead of official. By the time it was all over the Trooper had to pay $5000 damages, 30,000 punative, and 189,000 in lawyers fees out of his own pocket.
so wait. if he's "off duty", being paid by the city court as "security".. then what is he doing walking around in a jacket that says "Police" on it? can we say "overstating our position for the illusion of authority?"
And here's a question while he's in his police uniform and a photographer breaks the crime by taking a picture and he has to use his service weapon and put 16 bullets into the photographer who pays for those bullets the city the court or the photographer they'll probably charge the photographer with stealing them that's probably how they'll roll it I'm just saying that's ridiculous for them to say they're not working as a police officer if they're wearing their police officer uniform and all our police officer equipment including guns and tasers I know if I worked at one job and I wanted to take the tools now job to go work on another job that would not be allowed am I wrong
He’s the kind of guy who would load people onto trains, using the excuse “I’m just following orders.” This is why virtually no one who actually thinks respects these clowns.
Exerting your rights does not make you belligerent or uncooperative, it makes you more intelligent than the idiots TRYING TO enforce laws that don't exist.💪😎
Seems in this govt crook abridging my rights, starting a fight made me not only belligerent and uncooperative but, convicted and sentenced to a maximum sentence. th-cam.com/channels/pUAAE838pxt-_EOkdGksWg.html
Just obey. doesn't matter what the order is, doesn't matter that it's unlawful, doesn't matter that it's retaliatory, doesn't matter who it hurts. Just obey.
James I like how you bring the issue to the table very clearly! Humbleness is a great way to go. I have understood why you have turned the tables also! To make the point. Thank you for standing up for what we have as " we the peoples! "
Well cops are allowed to lie. During an investigation, undercover. It was never supposed to give them free reign to lie to every citizen they come in contact with.
Yes we actually need citizen review boards as well as I'll Review Board of retired officials meaning retired police officers investigators etc those people are usually willing to tell the truth I know I grew up respecting a lot of them hopefully there's still a lot of good ones out there also I think it would actually be good to have a 3 party review one being a citizen board one being retired officer and one being Cadets or college students coming into law enforcement that's why they would learn to do right right from the beginning maybe this would be a teaching situation as well as taking care of the liability of police because them investigating themselves is never going to show the truth and I am so sick of everybody covering up for each other I have lots of friends and family who are Leos and a lot of them at least the good ones do not like the blue line flag at all because most of them are ex-servicemen bears veterans and they fought for the real fly and putting the blue line on them just just races at that is actually a gang symbol that's a quote from my friends are Leos
The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant. Maximilien Robespierre When police unions foot the bill for police misconduct, police misconduct will end.
Absolutely! Once they have to repay some literal dues to the injured parties and be banned from using dues to fund political figure's campaigns they will stop allowing cover ups to avoid deserved punishment.
10:24 "He's busy protecting us. You gotta wait." Vern is delightful. I love his composure, humor, and how light he takes things prepared and knowing his rights.
Wow that cop looked so shook. They get scared when someone who is around that exactly knows the law better than them. Your confidence in your intelligence makes them shit their pants James. I can’t wait to meet you man
"HAZEL, hhhaaaazzzzellll." I feel you Mr. Vernon. 👀 I love that he fought the Bar Association complaint and won, even though he didn't give AF about practicing law. He's an awesome guy! Keep filming the courts!
I think we all need to stand together in force a policy where police officers have to pay individual insurance to cover their mistakes. It is they screw up , Their policy goes up just like ours do with driving or anything else
...and they would get screwed like us, which would make more of us work for insurance companies and no one else. Just hold them legally accountable for their actions.
Police Union Members get limited Legal Advice and Representation if not found personally liable by breaching Police Procedure and or special rules by Driving Record did not disqualify them if driving incident in a Squad Car.
Seems in this govt crook abridging my rights, starting a fight made me not only belligerent and uncooperative but, convicted and sentenced to a maximum sentence. th-cam.com/channels/pUAAE838pxt-_EOkdGksWg.html
You can tell how pissed off a COP is by how far apart his leg stance gets. It started out rather normal in this video and ended up very far apart at the end! LMAO! Just like a dog in a fight!!!
James I love you so much you just hit the nail right on the f****** head...!!!... We have to get these officers bonded they can put their houses up for collateral have payments automatically taken out of their paychecks whatever point is they need to be bonded so they're held responsible for their individual actions that's the only way to keep cops honest and actually it's the only way to make them use their f****** brains and actually think before they act... I personally thank an officer that's responsible for his own actions and knows full well that they will be held liable for their actions individually well that officers going to be more likely to uphold their oath and to act according to Department policy guidelines and within the law... Otherwise when the city or the department or the state is liable for the actions of the officer then the office is going to do whatever the f*** they please
The word charro is first documented in Spain in the 17th century (1627) as a synonym of "person who stops" (basto), "person who speaks roughly" (tosco), "person of the land" (aldeano), "person with bad taste",[2] and attributes its origins to the Basque language from the word txar which means "bad", "weak", "small". The Real Academia maintains the same definition and origin.
James, you need to teach how to Audit. You're one in a million bud. But with your help maybe you can make two or three in a million. I learn from each video, thanks
I'm already a fan of Verne! He is the kind I'd love to listen to the stories and wealth of knowledge he has. I do love the way he took this false claim and made it laughable. Way to go Verne, keep spanking these little punks and teaching them a well deserved lesson that they can't make false claims or break laws because their feelings got hurt. If being offended became a law every person on earth will be in jail. 😂😂😂
Another great video my friend but that's Vernon guy I want him for our new attorney general or at least my lawyer he's one cool dude as you are I love your videos and the way you calmly talk to them how you don't lose your mind like other auditors keep it up my friend schooling the public Pretenders
Hello. My understanding from case law, if the person under the color of law violates well established law violating civil Rights, they lose their immunity and can be sued personally. Because they lose their Shield of protection once they violate the law.
Been away so long I hardly knew the place Gee, it's good to be back home Leave it till tomorrow to unpack my case Honey disconnect the phone I'm back in the USSA
After we met the oath takers are trained to the Jedi mind trick to keep talking in circles have a whole conversation without answering any questions that is a tricky top-notch Jedi mind manipulation right there LOL
Great video of 'our shameless and useless Government in action'. *******The necessary response from Vernon, and those in his spot, is: NO THANKS, I already have plenty of toilet paper***********
There is liability, it falls under Title 42, Section 1983 of the US code. Any government official can have their immunity stripped and be held liable on a personal basis. When this happens, the state will neither pay for the judgement awarded, nor the attorney's fees.
@Floriduh Man The public going into an open courtroom is a First Amendment right. No “official business” is required. We have a First Amendment and common law right to attend most court proceedings that are not closed to the public by law. Closed proceedings are allowed if they are required to protect a criminal defendant’s constitutional rights. An in chambers conference or juvenile court proceeding would require some sort of “official business” or right to be in the chambers or courtroom. Parties or their attorney have a constitutional right to attend their own court proceedings. For example, under the Sixth Amendment a defendant can't legally be excluded from his or her own trial absent serious disruptive conduct.
@Floriduh Man I agree with you 147.38% in the colloquial sense. I just prefer to use “constitional rights” over “business” or “official” rights. In addition, in most instances, when it comes to Constitutional rights, often the underlying reason I exercise my First Amendment rights is none of the government’s “business” what my business is. For example, when a cop asks me a question I say, “I’m going to remain silent, I want a lawyer, I don't consent to any searches or seizures.” Then I remain silent, except to re-assert my rights if necessary, but I rarely if ever explain my “business” on the street or even in court to a cop, except as a courtesy in procedural matters. If I explain my business, I do so to a lawyer, or to a jury. The one time I defended myself in a jury trial and was acquitted, the government bungled the trial, partly because they had no information from me. In fact, I didn't even testify, and I still won. I don't expect most to reproduce what I have done, since I have been studying the law for 50 years. I saw my dad’s false arrest when I was 11 so I learned a little law even at age 11 (the government took my deposition in a civil case that my dad won at a jury trial). At age 15 or 16 I learned the entire Constitution and I can cite the first Ten Amendments exactly word for word to this day from memory (I’m not overly smart, just persistent). I don’t recommend doing it, but sometimes to be a smart aleck, I give the Miranda warning to the cops. (I memorized the Warning by being a pig-cop in the 70s-80s.) It perturbs them especially when I say, “do you understand the rights I just gave to you?” I do all my legal work pro se, so actually checking with a lawyer is rare for me, but it can't hurt for anyone to talk to a lawyer, especially if you are an activist. I describe myself as “high risk” for arrest because I don't like most cops. They know I peacefully attack in court if I have too, so they do things like stop me then claim they have a call so they don't write me a ticket. I rarely get stopped anyway because I scrupulously obey the law. My children were harassed by the cops because the cops wanted to harass me but couldn't because I’m so careful and can handle myself in court, but as a non-lawyer, I couldn't represent them It is difficult to believe how much the cops harassed my kid. For example, he got 11 tickets in under a year. We prevailed in most of them, but we were constantly in court. I believe the judge finally caught on, because he would do things like, call my kid’s name first and rush a dismissal, and dismiss the case because the cops didn't show up on time. As we were walking out the courtroom door, the cops walked in. The cops even practiced witness intimidation, that only stopped after we sued them in federal court. The cops would write my kid a warning ticket every day for months, warning him to move his car every three days. We hit the jackpot when a ride along with the cops knew my kid, and the coo told the ride along that the cops “enjoyed harassing” my kid by writing the warning tickets. We had an admission, and a third party to testify to it. Our 90 year old neighbor noticed and she told me she left her unlicensed car on the street just to see if she would get tickets too. She never did. I was proud of that old lady.
@Floriduh Man I have had too much success in the system to give up yet (”the long train of abuses” thing), including two precedential published court decisions in my favor that I briefed pro se, plus four out of four successful pro se extraordinary writs. Once I got the government’s respect, they have left me alone. A short while back, my daughter asked me, “how do you keep from getting arrested doing what you do?”** A genuine fact-based lawsuit, containing only truth, in federal court can do wonders. I urge you to do nothing without contacting us through TH-cam. This is the only life you have. As a humanist, I value your life, and as an ex-cop, I know cops will kill you and not care. They will have won, you lose. By living, you win. I play within the rules, but it can get hairy at times, so you don't need to feel like a coward using the court rules properly. But, you shouldn't do what I do, do what I say, which is assert your rights, shut up, zip it up, lock the zipper tightly, and shut up some more. If I don't know something, “I don't know” is my answer. But for “99.9%” of the people, silence is the only smart option when dealing with the police. I will take a court case I have thoroughly shepardized and do the same thing in the court case, so I have a case on all-fours as I can make it. I read as many or more unsuccessful court cases which help me also avoid something I know has not worked in the past. I once argued with a lawyer who claimed he didn't want any cases showing he was wrong, only those in his favor. Years ago, I worked for lawyers and it drove me batty that they didn't shepardize or read most of the cases they cited. Long before I even had a camera, I asked cops to show their ID to me, to do field sobriety tests for me, and so forth. I have read reverse Miranda rights to cops. I once walked past a detective in court, and without stopping, I told the person he was talking with, “if he’s a cop he’s lying.” The detective demanded my name, but I just ignored him and kept walking. I'm not in it for the glory, publicity, or money (I lose money), or I would ID myself here. I will someday when the time is ripe. **For example, I gave a sgt at a DUI checkpoint a package of Halloween candy teeth (I always check my lights, tires, license plate lights, etc. before purposely driving through a DUI checkpoint with an empty O’Doul’s non-alcoholic beer bottle, etc.). He asked me what the teeth were for. I told him to use the candy teeth to lie through on his police reports rather than lying through his own teeth. He chucked the candy at me and it bounced off my leather coat and hit my daughter, then he waved us on. I had to pull over I was laughing so hard I couldn't safely drive. Don't do something like this unless you are a gambler and don't have control over your local police department, and even then I say don’t do it. Note, I am stating general rules, and there are almost always exceptions, so learn the law yourself before acting. I can be wrong too; I don't claim divine status of infallibility, just experience. The laws change daily. Research the law before doing as I say--always.
You should probably learn what the 5th and 6th amendments are cause they literally have nothing to do with having the right to observe court proceedings
@@isiahaf1359 You don’t know what you are talking about. The public has a First Amendment right to view open court proceedings, such as trials and jury selection. The 6th Amendment gives the defendant a constitutional right to have a public, open trial. In some instances, statutes also give the public the right to attend court hearings “See Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 100 S.Ct. 2814, 65 L.Ed.2d 973 (1980) (First Amendment protects public access to criminal trials) ; Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 478 U.S. 1, 106 S.Ct. 2735, 92 L.Ed.2d 1 (1986) (preliminary hearings); Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 464 U.S. 501, 104 S.Ct. 819, 78 L.Ed.2d 629 (1984) (voir dire); Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596, 102 S.Ct. 2613, 73 L.Ed.2d 248 (1982) (trials involving sex crimes against minors).” California First Amendment Coalition v. Calderon (9th Cir. 1998) 150 F.3d 976, 981 You need to be careful when arguing with me about the Bill of Rights. I memorized the Constitution in 11th grade and have read the Constitution every couple of years for the last 50 years.
May want to check to see if this sergent's part time job pats time and-a-half, or even double time. That is just one of many ways our faithful SERVANTS overtime ends up greater than other benefits including their BASE PAY!
There is liability - when you have a UCC on yourself then you can name individuals as 'trustees' and thus they become personally liable as a trustee in their role as a public servant.
I agree completely. Make each individual officer accountable for his/her own actions it would solve so many problems with corruption .. RUN VERNON RUNNN !! LMFAO
If their sudo law says that nobody can film anybody inside that building then they really need to run around and dismantle all of the cameras in the building and demand that no body cams are active. It appears that they are in violation of their own ordinance.
When a cop says “I’m not gonna argue”, it means they’ve already lost but won’t admit it. Poor egos.
@@GinaBush-gb6tk I'd say the cop just doesn't have experience but was trying to be polite and might even agree with the guys filming even if he works for somebody who tells him to do something else.
No it don't. It just means he is through with these idiots.
It means they're done with the conversation like with almost everyone else
Amen,it means he sucks at his job because he doesn't know law or the bill of rights basically someone pinned a badge on him to fill roll call .
Yes
James Freeman, you're awesome man.
I appreciate yall being on the front line doing what you do.
Yes master! Thank you y’all for filming injustice!!!!!! 👏 your the heroes!!!
You laid out exactly what the problem is...personal liability.
@Jo Blow exactly.
This is why government employees tend to be dirt bags and there's so much corruption.
Sad.
Look up Title 42, Section 1983
correct but no way of getting rid of qualified immunity in the states that say they have just right more legislation to cover replace it
@@timoshea2400 Many states are getting ri of QI and they are working on federal legislation as well
Oh I'm a BIG fan of Vernon❤ I love his tenacity and he has a great smile😍
Does Vernon have a channel???
I want more of Vernon.... seems like a cool guy
In PA a woman here managed to sue in a section 1983 lawsuit in an individual capacity instead of official. By the time it was all over the Trooper had to pay $5000 damages, 30,000 punative, and 189,000 in lawyers fees out of his own pocket.
so wait. if he's "off duty", being paid by the city court as "security".. then what is he doing walking around in a jacket that says "Police" on it? can we say "overstating our position for the illusion of authority?"
lol
And here's a question while he's in his police uniform and a photographer breaks the crime by taking a picture and he has to use his service weapon and put 16 bullets into the photographer who pays for those bullets the city the court or the photographer they'll probably charge the photographer with stealing them that's probably how they'll roll it I'm just saying that's ridiculous for them to say they're not working as a police officer if they're wearing their police officer uniform and all our police officer equipment including guns and tasers I know if I worked at one job and I wanted to take the tools now job to go work on another job that would not be allowed am I wrong
He's acting in his official capacity; he's just trying to obfuscate the issue.
That's really sketchy.
But who watches the watchers?
Well, I mean these guys do.
But how can they change anything outside of the system?
He doesn’t care, his supervisor obviously doesn’t care, they are exempt from everything
He’s the kind of guy who would load people onto trains, using the excuse “I’m just following orders.” This is why virtually no one who actually thinks respects these clowns.
Exerting your rights does not make you belligerent or uncooperative, it makes you more intelligent than the idiots TRYING TO enforce laws that don't exist.💪😎
Intelligence is a crime when only morons have guns.
Seems in this govt crook abridging my rights, starting a fight made me not only belligerent and uncooperative but, convicted and sentenced to a maximum sentence. th-cam.com/channels/pUAAE838pxt-_EOkdGksWg.html
More Americans are killed by Police than any other terrorist group in America....think about that
Intelligence is Obedience
Just Obey!
@@bouncerslabrealnature9143 And will happen
"JUST OBEY" how often have we heard that? Way to many times!
Just obey. doesn't matter what the order is, doesn't matter that it's unlawful, doesn't matter that it's retaliatory, doesn't matter who it hurts. Just obey.
Yep. Obey and pray...that they don't throw you in jail for something you said while you were " cooperating ".
too*
didn't that one cop get 300 years making the ladies he pulled over service him?
Pull your pants down, bend over, put your hands behind your back, and just obey!
James I like how you bring the issue to the table very clearly! Humbleness is a great way to go. I have understood why you have turned the tables also! To make the point. Thank you for standing up for what we have as " we the peoples! "
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
THERE NEEDS TO BE LIABILITY FOR THE COPS. DECISIONS NEED CONSEQUENCES.
Well cops are allowed to lie. During an investigation, undercover. It was never supposed to give them free reign to lie to every citizen they come in contact with.
Yes we actually need citizen review boards as well as I'll Review Board of retired officials meaning retired police officers investigators etc those people are usually willing to tell the truth I know I grew up respecting a lot of them hopefully there's still a lot of good ones out there also I think it would actually be good to have a 3 party review one being a citizen board one being retired officer and one being Cadets or college students coming into law enforcement that's why they would learn to do right right from the beginning maybe this would be a teaching situation as well as taking care of the liability of police because them investigating themselves is never going to show the truth and I am so sick of everybody covering up for each other I have lots of friends and family who are Leos and a lot of them at least the good ones do not like the blue line flag at all because most of them are ex-servicemen bears veterans and they fought for the real fly and putting the blue line on them just just races at that is actually a gang symbol that's a quote from my friends are Leos
@@stonieheaded3703 that's a great idea, except, they're people, who can be threatened, paid off, like they are now. I don't know what the solution is.
,,,,,, aaaand there needs to be liability to the judges and councils that send them......
Well when I get this maximum sentence and conviction overturned, we'll see. th-cam.com/channels/pUAAE838pxt-_EOkdGksWg.html
I want Vernon as my LAWYER! Seems way to cool man!!!!
If that cop is working as security ( private job) and still wearing his police jacket?
@@GinaBush-gb6tk something your dad does at the trash bar
The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant.
Maximilien Robespierre
When police unions foot the bill for police misconduct, police misconduct will end.
Absolutely! Once they have to repay some literal dues to the injured parties and be banned from using dues to fund political figure's campaigns they will stop allowing cover ups to avoid deserved punishment.
They are paying him to be a security guard. That is what an off-duty assignment makes him.
Counts towards his pension tho.. feel better now, citizen?
@@gbear1005 No it doesn't, he is self employed in that capacity and must file separate tax forms.
Notice how many times he used "ARGUE". A word used to terminate what is a discussion...
My Ex- Wives use that.....yet I still pay "em...Doh!!!!
It's never an " argument" it's the public servant being corrected.
10:24 "He's busy protecting us. You gotta wait."
Vern is delightful. I love his composure, humor, and how light he takes things prepared and knowing his rights.
Thanks James good to see everything back on track Vernon is the man
Absolutely LOVE what you guy's are doing ! Keep em rolling !
I just want to hang out with all of these guys and chill! I know some HVAC so we have a lot in common. Cheers from Eugene Oregon!
He’s a deputy working in an official capacity so he’s on duty.
You know I subbed to those two channels. You guys are my hero’s !! 🙂👍❤️🙏✌️🇺🇸
Beautiful one of the most educational audit video's period
Its so funny to see a lawyer catch them on their own paperwork.
Wow that cop looked so shook. They get scared when someone who is around that exactly knows the law better than them. Your confidence in your intelligence makes them shit their pants James. I can’t wait to meet you man
The security guards facial expressions indicate contempt and a yearning for escalation when the retired lawyer is speaking to him.
"HAZEL, hhhaaaazzzzellll." I feel you Mr. Vernon. 👀 I love that he fought the Bar Association complaint and won, even though he didn't give AF about practicing law. He's an awesome guy! Keep filming the courts!
Could barely get through the door before you guys got confronted 😂😂
lol....hahaha the dirtiest, most embarrassing walk of shame ever recorded.
educational and constructive.
thx team
‘Hey, what’s up guys? It’ssss Jamessss Freemannnn!’
I think we all need to stand together in force a policy where police officers have to pay individual insurance to cover their mistakes. It is they screw up , Their policy goes up just like ours do with driving or anything else
Excellent idea.
@slayne2 I agree. Just an idea.
Think so? LOL
...and they would get screwed like us, which would make more of us work for insurance companies and no one else. Just hold them legally accountable for their actions.
Police Union Members get limited Legal Advice and Representation if not found personally liable by breaching Police Procedure and or special rules by Driving Record did not disqualify them if driving incident in a Squad Car.
That is hilarious! They're serving everyone for one guy. OMG. These clowns.
*qualifications for being a cop......do anything for your master tells you.*
Above all else, you must have been bullied in your child or adult life.
Seems in this govt crook abridging my rights, starting a fight made me not only belligerent and uncooperative but, convicted and sentenced to a maximum sentence. th-cam.com/channels/pUAAE838pxt-_EOkdGksWg.html
Of course. Anyone who think otherwise is brainwashed.
Like a bunch of dogs
"USSA"
That's a label that's likely to stick
'in this day and age'.
Respect from Australia
How the hell did i just watch this video for 10 min before i ever heard, or knew Bao was there.. My mind is totally blown
You can tell how pissed off a COP is by how far apart his leg stance gets. It started out rather normal in this video and ended up very far apart at the end! LMAO! Just like a dog in a fight!!!
James I love you so much you just hit the nail right on the f****** head...!!!... We have to get these officers bonded they can put their houses up for collateral have payments automatically taken out of their paychecks whatever point is they need to be bonded so they're held responsible for their individual actions that's the only way to keep cops honest and actually it's the only way to make them use their f****** brains and actually think before they act... I personally thank an officer that's responsible for his own actions and knows full well that they will be held liable for their actions individually well that officers going to be more likely to uphold their oath and to act according to Department policy guidelines and within the law... Otherwise when the city or the department or the state is liable for the actions of the officer then the office is going to do whatever the f*** they please
The word charro is first documented in Spain in the 17th century (1627) as a synonym of "person who stops" (basto), "person who speaks roughly" (tosco), "person of the land" (aldeano), "person with bad taste",[2] and attributes its origins to the Basque language from the word txar which means "bad", "weak", "small". The Real Academia maintains the same definition and origin.
"I'm here to obey the people I'm working for".... THE PUBLIC? Hmmmmm
James, you need to teach how to Audit. You're one in a million bud. But with your help maybe you can make two or three in a million. I learn from each video, thanks
Stay strong and keep up the great work James.
I'm already a fan of Verne! He is the kind I'd love to listen to the stories and wealth of knowledge he has. I do love the way he took this false claim and made it laughable. Way to go Verne, keep spanking these little punks and teaching them a well deserved lesson that they can't make false claims or break laws because their feelings got hurt. If being offended became a law every person on earth will be in jail. 😂😂😂
Right James when we can sue cops,security guards,ect. as individuals this kind of bullshit will never stop. THANKS JAMES
What a great video, James! I currently have you on the back-burner as far as 1st Amendment videos go. You might be moving up...
James is the man.
Love this guy.
Why can’t the police just let him film?
They got to harass every god damned time.
Love it. This is comical.
we are living in a judge dredd movie "I AM THE LAW"
It's funny because I think that all those movies like Judge Dredd movies and Those futuristic movies, but we're the law is what the cop say it is.
Another great video my friend but that's Vernon guy I want him for our new attorney general or at least my lawyer he's one cool dude as you are I love your videos and the way you calmly talk to them how you don't lose your mind like other auditors keep it up my friend schooling the public Pretenders
Ooh good grief and how stupid and crazy handing out someone else's paper work. How ironic! Lmao! Great aduit James
Come to Henry county Illinois courthouse in Cambridge, they don't even allow a turned off cell phone in the building
"I don't consent to all of the cameras in the building recording me!" is what you should have replied with!
James Freeman is an American hero.
We owe you a huge debt of gratitude.
*FILMING "IS" OFFICIAL BUSINESS*
AWESOME work you are doing James Freeman News YOU ROCK it for the People !! i'm soooooooGratefull !!
Do the thing a traitor does, get what traitors get.
No muss no fuss.
But their not traitors, because they were never on our side. They're terrorists.
@Law and Order your right, I was wrong to ever trust in the government and wrong to believe that they will ever change their ways on their own.
James you do GREAT work I'm watching from Tuscaloosa Alabama (Roll Tide Roll)!!!!!
Government CONSPIRACY to squelch his First Amendment!
SUE THEM!!!
Hello.
My understanding from case law, if the person under the color of law violates well established law violating civil Rights, they lose their immunity and can be sued personally. Because they lose their Shield of protection once they violate the law.
Freeman, you silver tongue devil, I love how you do what you do! ! !
0:38 this guy how fast and pointed he put down his phone is impressive damn..
The old man knows the law better than the cop, what a slap on the face on the officer! Good job !
He didn't get protected, but he definitely got served... 😁
amazing work :)
I admire how you stop them immediately talking over you they should know the law or don't speak well done as usual👍👍
Been away so long I hardly knew the place
Gee, it's good to be back home
Leave it till tomorrow to unpack my case
Honey disconnect the phone
I'm back in the USSA
This is similar to what they charged Ian with but it was just an old lady at a merchant stand.
Same Ian I know?
sorry, meant Keene or Seim.....lol
Michael R. Ian from HATETHESTATE.
After we met the oath takers are trained to the Jedi mind trick to keep talking in circles have a whole conversation without answering any questions that is a tricky top-notch Jedi mind manipulation right there LOL
He is free to do what they tell him! He is free to do what they tell him!
So petty I am so sick of it and I am not out there with you guys. 🙂👍✌️🙏❤️🇺🇸
Yes, the ODDITORS are so petty, just plain public Nuisance children
Beth I was referring to the public officials .
American Amy Wait, so you don’t like Mr. Freeman? Can you please elaborate?
"We want to precisely know what you did not say !" ( Catch 22 )
This is superb catch of BS! God bless you for EXPOSING what so many refuse to acknowledge! You risk your live to expose truth with integrity. Ty
Great video of 'our shameless and useless Government in action'. *******The necessary response from Vernon, and those in his spot, is: NO THANKS, I already have plenty of toilet paper***********
U need to always bring a lawyer w you on these missions. It's definitely giving your case more weight ..
There are no shortage of evil weak men who will do whatever they are told for a slice of bread. NEVER GIVE UP YOUR GUNS.
El Charro is a BEAST!! He talks bad to them!! I love it!!
There is liability, it falls under Title 42, Section 1983 of the US code. Any government official can have their immunity stripped and be held liable on a personal basis. When this happens, the state will neither pay for the judgement awarded, nor the attorney's fees.
You don't need "official business" to go into the courtroom. Observing the court proceedings is a First and Sixth Amendment right.
@Floriduh Man The public going into an open courtroom is a First Amendment right. No “official business” is required. We have a First Amendment and common law right to attend most court proceedings that are not closed to the public by law. Closed proceedings are allowed if they are required to protect a criminal defendant’s constitutional rights. An in chambers conference or juvenile court proceeding would require some sort of “official business” or right to be in the chambers or courtroom. Parties or their attorney have a constitutional right to attend their own court proceedings. For example, under the Sixth Amendment a defendant can't legally be excluded from his or her own trial absent serious disruptive conduct.
@Floriduh Man I agree with you 147.38% in the colloquial sense. I just prefer to use “constitional rights” over “business” or “official” rights. In addition, in most instances, when it comes to Constitutional rights, often the underlying reason I exercise my First Amendment rights is none of the government’s “business” what my business is.
For example, when a cop asks me a question I say, “I’m going to remain silent, I want a lawyer, I don't consent to any searches or seizures.” Then I remain silent, except to re-assert my rights if necessary, but I rarely if ever explain my “business” on the street or even in court to a cop, except as a courtesy in procedural matters. If I explain my business, I do so to a lawyer, or to a jury. The one time I defended myself in a jury trial and was acquitted, the government bungled the trial, partly because they had no information from me. In fact, I didn't even testify, and I still won.
I don't expect most to reproduce what I have done, since I have been studying the law for 50 years. I saw my dad’s false arrest when I was 11 so I learned a little law even at age 11 (the government took my deposition in a civil case that my dad won at a jury trial). At age 15 or 16 I learned the entire Constitution and I can cite the first Ten Amendments exactly word for word to this day from memory (I’m not overly smart, just persistent).
I don’t recommend doing it, but sometimes to be a smart aleck, I give the Miranda warning to the cops. (I memorized the Warning by being a pig-cop in the 70s-80s.) It perturbs them especially when I say, “do you understand the rights I just gave to you?”
I do all my legal work pro se, so actually checking with a lawyer is rare for me, but it can't hurt for anyone to talk to a lawyer, especially if you are an activist. I describe myself as “high risk” for arrest because I don't like most cops. They know I peacefully attack in court if I have too, so they do things like stop me then claim they have a call so they don't write me a ticket. I rarely get stopped anyway because I scrupulously obey the law. My children were harassed by the cops because the cops wanted to harass me but couldn't because I’m so careful and can handle myself in court, but as a non-lawyer, I couldn't represent them
It is difficult to believe how much the cops harassed my kid. For example, he got 11 tickets in under a year. We prevailed in most of them, but we were constantly in court. I believe the judge finally caught on, because he would do things like, call my kid’s name first and rush a dismissal, and dismiss the case because the cops didn't show up on time. As we were walking out the courtroom door, the cops walked in. The cops even practiced witness intimidation, that only stopped after we sued them in federal court. The cops would write my kid a warning ticket every day for months, warning him to move his car every three days. We hit the jackpot when a ride along with the cops knew my kid, and the coo told the ride along that the cops “enjoyed harassing” my kid by writing the warning tickets. We had an admission, and a third party to testify to it. Our 90 year old neighbor noticed and she told me she left her unlicensed car on the street just to see if she would get tickets too. She never did. I was proud of that old lady.
@Floriduh Man I have had too much success in the system to give up yet (”the long train of abuses” thing), including two precedential published court decisions in my favor that I briefed pro se, plus four out of four successful pro se extraordinary writs. Once I got the government’s respect, they have left me alone. A short while back, my daughter asked me, “how do you keep from getting arrested doing what you do?”** A genuine fact-based lawsuit, containing only truth, in federal court can do wonders.
I urge you to do nothing without contacting us through TH-cam. This is the only life you have. As a humanist, I value your life, and as an ex-cop, I know cops will kill you and not care. They will have won, you lose. By living, you win. I play within the rules, but it can get hairy at times, so you don't need to feel like a coward using the court rules properly. But, you shouldn't do what I do, do what I say, which is assert your rights, shut up, zip it up, lock the zipper tightly, and shut up some more. If I don't know something, “I don't know” is my answer. But for “99.9%” of the people, silence is the only smart option when dealing with the police. I will take a court case I have thoroughly shepardized and do the same thing in the court case, so I have a case on all-fours as I can make it. I read as many or more unsuccessful court cases which help me also avoid something I know has not worked in the past. I once argued with a lawyer who claimed he didn't want any cases showing he was wrong, only those in his favor. Years ago, I worked for lawyers and it drove me batty that they didn't shepardize or read most of the cases they cited.
Long before I even had a camera, I asked cops to show their ID to me, to do field sobriety tests for me, and so forth. I have read reverse Miranda rights to cops. I once walked past a detective in court, and without stopping, I told the person he was talking with, “if he’s a cop he’s lying.” The detective demanded my name, but I just ignored him and kept walking. I'm not in it for the glory, publicity, or money (I lose money), or I would ID myself here. I will someday when the time is ripe.
**For example, I gave a sgt at a DUI checkpoint a package of Halloween candy teeth (I always check my lights, tires, license plate lights, etc. before purposely driving through a DUI checkpoint with an empty O’Doul’s non-alcoholic beer bottle, etc.). He asked me what the teeth were for. I told him to use the candy teeth to lie through on his police reports rather than lying through his own teeth. He chucked the candy at me and it bounced off my leather coat and hit my daughter, then he waved us on. I had to pull over I was laughing so hard I couldn't safely drive. Don't do something like this unless you are a gambler and don't have control over your local police department, and even then I say don’t do it. Note, I am stating general rules, and there are almost always exceptions, so learn the law yourself before acting. I can be wrong too; I don't claim divine status of infallibility, just experience. The laws change daily. Research the law before doing as I say--always.
You should probably learn what the 5th and 6th amendments are cause they literally have nothing to do with having the right to observe court proceedings
@@isiahaf1359 You don’t know what you are talking about. The public has a First Amendment right to view open court proceedings, such as trials and jury selection. The 6th Amendment gives the defendant a constitutional right to have a public, open trial. In some instances, statutes also give the public the right to attend court hearings
“See Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 100 S.Ct. 2814, 65 L.Ed.2d 973 (1980) (First Amendment protects public access to criminal trials) ; Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 478 U.S. 1, 106 S.Ct. 2735, 92 L.Ed.2d 1 (1986) (preliminary hearings); Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 464 U.S. 501, 104 S.Ct. 819, 78 L.Ed.2d 629 (1984) (voir dire); Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596, 102 S.Ct. 2613, 73 L.Ed.2d 248 (1982) (trials involving sex crimes against minors).”
California First Amendment Coalition v. Calderon (9th Cir. 1998) 150 F.3d 976, 981
You need to be careful when arguing with me about the Bill of Rights. I memorized the Constitution in 11th grade and have read the Constitution every couple of years for the last 50 years.
This is the same defense the SS troops used in the Neun berg trials and they DID NOT accept this position as valid.
You should sell a t shirt with a picture of a cop that says “Welcome to the USSA. You have rights but we will violate them”
Scare tactics 😬
Once he said he was a police officer, his knowledge of anything is suspect.
That cop looked high as shit thinking he was just going to stand there in the back and make some easy overtime.
May want to check to see if this sergent's part time job pats time and-a-half, or even double time. That is just one of many ways our faithful SERVANTS overtime ends up greater than other benefits including their BASE PAY!
As he approaches being a centenarian, maybe Christopher Hale should reconsider retirement!
There is liability - when you have a UCC on yourself then you can name individuals as 'trustees' and thus they become personally liable as a trustee in their role as a public servant.
Thanks again 💪✌
If they had personal liability for violating constitutional rights. The Citizenry would be treated with respect .
I agree completely. Make each individual officer accountable for his/her own actions it would solve so many problems with corruption .. RUN VERNON RUNNN !! LMFAO
So now comes the cover-up the manipulation of the law to be followed by intimidation and revenge.
Definition of a jerk cop: a cop who threatens to ticket you for littering IF you drop the incomplete & bogus papers you've been served
These tyrants need checked for sure. Well done.
When a cop says “I’m not gonna argue” ..means I have a Low IQ
Very good!!!! Loved it!!
So much blood spilled by the hands of those just following orders!!
It was basically a Form of Intimidation .....
If their sudo law says that nobody can film anybody inside that building then they really need to run around and dismantle all of the cameras in the building and demand that no body cams are active. It appears that they are in violation of their own ordinance.
A cop and a lawyer walks into a bar
5000 views and only 612 likes? Y’all are slacking on this man.