Waveguide Power Handling (4k Video)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @robbieconnor9992
    @robbieconnor9992 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for your great videos!!

    • @oldhackee3915
      @oldhackee3915  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks very much.

  • @biswajit681
    @biswajit681 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Eagerly waiting for new video

    • @oldhackee3915
      @oldhackee3915  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Another is coming soon.

  • @mikechoi5796
    @mikechoi5796 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am a big fan of your videos. I love the fact that you mathematically derive your explanations. I have noticed that there is a "dearth" of microwave theory textbooks, or lab manuals for that matter, that set forth the underlying mathematics of simple RF network analysis equations - simple transmission line problems for complex series and parallel networks. Could you recommend a couple of microwave theory textbooks (or lab manuals) that derive their equations and support their equations with "enumerated" examples (I am really looking for "textbooks" with enumerated solutions)?

    • @oldhackee3915
      @oldhackee3915  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks so much. Unfortunately I have not seen a RF book that does what you are talking about, which is a shame. In my observation, it looks like RF and microwave text book are regurgitations of previous ones, especially with waveguide. It’s a bunch of vector calculus with no real world examples. I wish I could be more help.

  • @nonsquid
    @nonsquid 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Maybe if we used sulfur hexafluoride gas SF6 as a wave guide quench gas, we could push more power. I guess we would have to shield the outside as well as the inside.

    • @oldhackee3915
      @oldhackee3915  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for the comment. That sounds interesting.

    • @Duracellmumus
      @Duracellmumus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If the capacitance not change and dielectric looses not going to be mutch higher than as air use as insulator.

    • @nonsquid
      @nonsquid 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Duracellmumus So does that mean we can't use wave guides in the vacuum of space without the dielectric of air?

  • @biswajit681
    @biswajit681 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please upload some analog stuff 😊

    • @oldhackee3915
      @oldhackee3915  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Too much microwaves for you?

    • @douglasstrother6584
      @douglasstrother6584 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@oldhackee3915 There's never *too much* microwaves!

    • @petersage5157
      @petersage5157 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Microwaves _are_ analog! They're just in one of the gaps in our analog ranges of perception. Too fast to hear; too slow to see.
      As far as I know, Old Hack hasn't uploaded anything that _isn't_ about analog, and I love him for that. None of that digital rubbish on this channel!

  • @usopenplayer
    @usopenplayer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you had asked me before watching this, I would have assumed that breakdown voltage increased with less air.
    I find it very counter intuitive that less air means less power.
    I'm guessing that it starts to curve back up once you get near vacuum, since there's nothing to ionize?

    • @oldhackee3915
      @oldhackee3915  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Indeed. I found the Wikipedia page to help me understand. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paschen's_law

  • @campbellmorrison8540
    @campbellmorrison8540 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So what does that mean for waveguides in space, it looks like its down to a few watts would that be right? or is voltage breakdown in space much higher as there is no air

    • @oldhackee3915
      @oldhackee3915  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The voltage breakdown goes back up in a vacuum. The Wikipedia page on Paschen’s Law the graph is better than mine as it approaches a vacuum.

    • @douglasstrother6584
      @douglasstrother6584 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The next regime of microwave mayhem for space applications is known as multipaction or multipactor. It is a resonance breakdown phenomena requiring both a vacuum (no air) and radiation (free electrons) environment.

    • @douglasstrother6584
      @douglasstrother6584 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@oldhackee3915 Your plot is fine. There is a lot of interesting Physics summarized in a Paschen Diagram, especially that the x-axis is product fo frequency*dimension.

    • @douglasstrother6584
      @douglasstrother6584 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Look-up Hatch & Williams regarding Multipaction.

    • @oldhackee3915
      @oldhackee3915  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for the comment.