@@MrMooremelody we deliberately tried a different format to not have the back-and-forth discussions like normal to keep the episode length around 20-25 mins. We’ll consider reverting to our normal style next time 😀
What about Keon Ellis? I'm surprised that he's not on more sleeper lists as he returned 7th round value when he became a starter last year. He's projected to start again this year.
NYK have no dept so he might have good minutes of the bench. Depends if Thibs try to run Jericho over him. But in a 14T pts league, I think I'd pick him up.
The Positive: Your analysis and detail was really good. The Negative: For F's sake, none of these guys are sleepers, they're simply upside or undervalued players. What rock would someone have to live under to not be extremely familiar with Top 150 players? Sleepers = players who will go almost entirely undrafted, but have the potential to return value greater than drafted players. It would be far more helpful to identify players who don't even have an ADP but are worthy of attention. Sorry for the rant, again your content was good, but when someone is scouring for specific content it's frustrating to find titles that don't match that content.
Sleeper is just a bad and confusing term cause no one use it the same way. But I guess I understand your point, guys like Risacher, Castle, Buzelis, Ware, Kevin Porter Jr, Jordan Miller, Rob Dillingham, Jovic, Strus, Fontechio would be better suited for that term.
@@warwid5419 Agree on the lack of term uniformity. This is why it's important to define key terms at the beginning of a video. I always feel bad leaving negatively tinged feedback, and in this case, 'NBA Fantasy Bible' took the brunt of my accumulated frustration after watching 3 other similar videos. This leads to a point I didn't make. Fantasy advice is an increasingly crowded space on social media. To have any staying power, a content creator needs to (1) provide something different/new, (2) be uncommonly exceptional at restating widely available information, or (3) have differentiating charisma. Eventually someone will recognize the untapped niche focusing on players in the gray area (7-10 rotation slots), while discussing 1-6 leads to an irritating string of low-value 'Captain Obvious' comments. Please give your audience a little more credit for their knowledge. Recognize the type of player bothering to watch fantasy content is far more likely a serious player vs. a noob/casual player. Discussing the gray areas is a pathway to gaining traction vs. the same tired talking points as everyone else. Once a base audience is established, then it makes sense to cover the "frustratingly tired talking points" as a one-stop source of information.
Really appreicate the visual graphics. Makes it easier to follow along! Thank you
@@patrickohara5687 thank you for the feedback. I’m glad the graphics help.
Great video guys. :) Kayla as quiet as a church mouse when D Mac is talking lol
Lmfao 😂. I was sick and trying to save my voice so that’s why I’ve been a bit quiet the past few episodes lol. Thanks for your support!
@@MrMooremelody we deliberately tried a different format to not have the back-and-forth discussions like normal to keep the episode length around 20-25 mins. We’ll consider reverting to our normal style next time 😀
Listening from Nova Scotia! Subscribed thanks this is great
@@mike_maclean5787 thanks for that, Mike. Love the support, and glad you enjoyed the show all the way in Nova Scotia.
🇨🇦 represent!
Thanks guys. Love the format and Coverage. Very helpful.
@@GunnyKeith thank you, Keith. Really appreciate the support
I drafted three of your targets DMac, you must have been cursing me in our draft!
@@catsinoakland I was cursing quite a few in the draft haha
What about Keon Ellis? I'm surprised that he's not on more sleeper lists as he returned 7th round value when he became a starter last year. He's projected to start again this year.
First! Keen to see Clowney play, sad to not get him in my draft (I got pipped!)
Clowney’s game is so exiting. I missed out on him in my most recent draft and I almost cried 😢
@@nbafantasybible I had him taken one round before me- I got him in dynasty at least. To say I'm excited is an understatement, the man's a beast!
@@nfishing9794 he is an absolute beast! Future of the Nets IMO. Cannot wait to see him play this season. I wish I had more shares
@nbafantasybible amen to that! I've gone young in dynasty and also have hali, melo, onyeka and guys like dillingham. I'm excited for my future
@@nfishing9794 tremendous young core there. Nicely played
hi, how about Precious Achiuwa? worth picking up?
@@marcusbryant2007 I’m not very high on Precious, but worth considering very late in drafts
NYK have no dept so he might have good minutes of the bench. Depends if Thibs try to run Jericho over him. But in a 14T pts league, I think I'd pick him up.
The Positive: Your analysis and detail was really good. The Negative: For F's sake, none of these guys are sleepers, they're simply upside or undervalued players. What rock would someone have to live under to not be extremely familiar with Top 150 players? Sleepers = players who will go almost entirely undrafted, but have the potential to return value greater than drafted players. It would be far more helpful to identify players who don't even have an ADP but are worthy of attention. Sorry for the rant, again your content was good, but when someone is scouring for specific content it's frustrating to find titles that don't match that content.
Sleeper is just a bad and confusing term cause no one use it the same way. But I guess I understand your point, guys like Risacher, Castle, Buzelis, Ware, Kevin Porter Jr, Jordan Miller, Rob Dillingham, Jovic, Strus, Fontechio would be better suited for that term.
@@warwid5419 Agree on the lack of term uniformity. This is why it's important to define key terms at the beginning of a video. I always feel bad leaving negatively tinged feedback, and in this case, 'NBA Fantasy Bible' took the brunt of my accumulated frustration after watching 3 other similar videos. This leads to a point I didn't make. Fantasy advice is an increasingly crowded space on social media. To have any staying power, a content creator needs to (1) provide something different/new, (2) be uncommonly exceptional at restating widely available information, or (3) have differentiating charisma.
Eventually someone will recognize the untapped niche focusing on players in the gray area (7-10 rotation slots), while discussing 1-6 leads to an irritating string of low-value 'Captain Obvious' comments. Please give your audience a little more credit for their knowledge. Recognize the type of player bothering to watch fantasy content is far more likely a serious player vs. a noob/casual player. Discussing the gray areas is a pathway to gaining traction vs. the same tired talking points as everyone else. Once a base audience is established, then it makes sense to cover the "frustratingly tired talking points" as a one-stop source of information.
Why is nobody talking about Deni as as sleeper, he will be a starter in Portland