Thanks for watching everyone! I obviously hoped to see a positive response, but I didn't think I'd actually get thousands of views on my first video! It makes me really happy to see so many people enjoying this topic. The Harmonic Numbers are the tip of an iceberg into some really cool math, and I hope to eventually share that whole journey on this channel. I've been working on another (completely unrelated) video, but as I'm doing this between work and other personal projects, I can't give any estimates as to when it will be ready. I just wanted you to know that there definitely is more on the horizon!
oh yeah you gonna blow up. havent watched these kinds of videos in a while and youtube just puts you on my home page...pretty sure youre gonna have a huge spike of views (or just had and the algo still loves you) been a pleasure to watch too
@@vancedforU he refers to the "real magic" if the function because it extends the harmonics from the whole numbers to the real numbers. just well placed.
Dude, this video is one of the best produced math videos I’ve seen in a while! You have the elegant animations of 3Blue1Brown while also touching subjects I’m more interested in, so bravo, honestly! Keep up the good work, I’m excited to see what you have in store in the future!
Nice video. One very small point I would make would be at 10:55 on your justification of using a straight line for the interval, as opposed to some squiggly up and down one. I believe it would be better to justify it under the intuition that the harmonic functions extended to the reals should be a strictly increasing function, rather than the rather loose "it is the most natural. It's probably being overly pedantic, but mathematics is all about rigour
Even if you add the argument of strict increase, it is not necessary for the function to be a straight line, there still is some intuition to it. The argument probably should be that if f(x) does not change much also every derivative of f goes to 0. And even this is hard to proof as you can not do the limit of the difference quotient because you do not have infinetely close points for which the function is defined. Anyways, as we are looking for a function that behaves kind of natural in some way, we can just take that as a definition of "natural": that every derivative disappears on the interval between arbitrarily close points. (Now as I am writing this I wonder, if you could proof that under the condition, that every derivative should be continous in any point - but I am not enough of a mathematician to try that myself.)
@@ery5757 well for the really big numbers in order for it to be monotonically it needs to be close to a straight line, otherwise it would go above the second value/below the first. It may not be exactly but as you get bigger and bigger it gets closer and closer. This is expressed by the statement that for any x lim[N->inf] H(N) - H(N + x) = 0
@@ery5757 yea um x was (heavily) implied to be finite when N explicitly goes to infinity. You’re being extremely pedantic and I’m not even sure why - for any finite x, x inf] N since N >> inf. Heck in the video he explicitly said something equivalent to “for very large N in relation to x” N>>x. Do you think the statement of “very large N in relation to x” stopped applying at some point? Because if so tell me where it stopped applying. I’ll wait Oh, and if you really want to be pedantic it’s only if |x|
When I first learned about sigma notation and the Riemann Zeta function, I spent the next 5 nights playing on Wolfram Alpha, and it was fun. It was very similar to what you've done here! Thanks for the connection with the digamma function, too, I never knew what that was.
how did you go from learning the sigma notation to learning the zeta function so fast? i learned sigma notation like 4 years ago, and i AM sure, that i wont be studying zeta function for atleast the next 3 years
I didn't even notice 15 minutes have gone by. That's how good you are at explaining things. Awesome, man! Keep going! The world needs more lucid explainers like you!
12:28 Math is crazy in a way that you can have an good intuition about every separate fact but when combined, knocks you back to the start and realize you don't really comprehend the whole story.
I discovered this while "discovering" the stamp collector's problem for myself. There's a fun approximation that's useful if you're trying to find how long it takes to get items from a random draw.
Wow! I used essentially this idea to find a continuous extension for the factorials! I know the gamma function already exists, but doing it this way gives you a different formula that happens to give you exactly the same thing as the gamma function. I never considered doing the same thing with other functions, so cool!
Amazing first video - I can't wait to see what's next! Not taking into account the reasons why you'd prefer one notation over another, I think it's a bit curious though how computing the first numbers gets more and more difficult as you get further into this video - I mean at the start it is just evaluating fractions, and by the end you have to calculate an infinite sum!
Thank you!! The infinite sum is great because you can take derivatives and integrals, and in general a bigger domain means more potential to find interesting patterns. But if you ask me for H(20), there's no chance I'm adding infinite terms when I only need to do 20! (Plus, the sum converges pretty slowly, especially for larger numbers)
Oh! Can you can do calculus on sums? I always thought that was kind of a dead end! It's still pretty nuts how do calculate the Nth harmonic, you have to add the first N reciprocals. Coming from a computer science background, I feel the best way to implement this would not be one of the mentioned formulas; a lookup table is too sparse, the classic definition gets too slow too quickly, and the summation takes too long to converge. I'm kinda baffled by how many ways there are do calculate this one thing!
@@zanzlanz You can do calculus on sums; you just have to make sure there aren't any shenanigans going on. It's like with mixed partial derivatives; usually they're equal, unless the function is going nuts at some point. (For more eye-glazing details, look up the Monotone Convergence and Dominated Convergence Theorems.) As for calculating harmonic numbers, there are asymptotic expansions which work pretty well. For example, H(n) is about ln n + gamma + 1/2n - 1/12n² + 1/120n⁴, where gamma is the Euler-Mascheroni Constant. You can continue extending this approximation, but unfortunately for any finite n the terms start getting larger after some point (this is a general problem with asymptotic series). However, the computational advantages are enormous. Finding the billionth harmonic number by summation would take literally billions of calculations and only give you about eight places of accuracy past the decimal point; the above formula (with a previously calculated value of gamma) yield over fifty places after the decimal point (the first omitted term is of order 1/n⁶, or one part in 10⁵⁴).
Damn, I am a high schooler who is interested in maths. Gamma-function, Digamma function, harmonic numbers and extension of series from integers to real(and complex) numbers are definitely one of my favorite topics. Honestly, this is the best video about harmonic numbers I’ve seen so far.
As someone who's interested in somewhat niche generalizations like this, this video was really interesting! It was very well explained and visualized and easy to understand
Got excited that I'd found a new cool maths channel. Got disappointed when I realized it's only your first video. Got excited again when I realized it's only your first video. Please keep it up!
To actually see it try plotting it in geogebra it's just like desmos but I personally love it more just type psi(x+1) -psi(1) and it will graph it for you ❤
Wow, I rarely find a new channel to which I’d like to subscribe, but I’ve «never» been so quick to hit the bell icon too. 0: Extraordinary success lays just over the horizon for this channel. Keep it up!!
Nice! Though we *can* get H(0) = 0 from the original sum-of-reciprocals definition too: for that case the sum has no terms, and an empty sum equals zero (likewise an empty product equals one). Don’t be afraid that the sum is “from 1 to 0” in that case-that’s equivalent to being from 1 inclusive to 1 exclusive, which then makes more sense to have zero terms in it.
Absolute brilliant video, I love those exploration videos that take you through a journey of discovery. And this video does it perfectly. Can’t wait for the next video
I can see that you took great effort in making sure that every step and intention behind it is clearly conveyed. When you're an expert yourself, it's hard to know what steps would be difficult to digest from a novice point of view. I enjoyed watching this video very much.
I read the title and thought about it for a day and came up with a different extension H(x)= integral of (1-t^x)/(1-t) for t from 0 to 1. And then I learned the completely different approach from the video. Time to try proving they are equal haha...
It was hard for me to silence the voice in my head screaming "It's just a natural log! Use an integral approximation!", but this was definitely worth it! Great video :)
I'm very happy that the summer of math is/was a thing there are so many really exellent videos emerging recently (and especially also so many new great people doing interesting educational videos). I really hope more people see this as I find it very well made
This is excellent! And the first video on this channel? This sort of thing has a sizeable audience, I'm sure, and it's distinct from what I'm seen elsewhere. Keep it up!
Hi, I have watched nearly all of 3blue1brown's videos, and yet I still think yours was one of the best I have ever encountered. I am *begging* you to upload another one, you could easily match 3b1b's videos in quality, and you in fact already did, if not better. TH-cam lacks great content like yours
You have explained the generalization of the Harmonic function so well that I can't wait for your explanation of the Riemann zeta function. But take your time and do it right.
The highlight of the beauty of his articulation skills in this video was the part where he explained how there is a well-defined value for x=1/2 at very very large N since there is a smooth line meaning things are approximately the same (especially knowing about limits from calc) then he visually showed taking regular intervals back from the recursive relation meaning we have a value at every step of the way. It’s amazing! I have gained a lot from this experience. I now see mathematics more as a puzzle where we are trying to think about a very clever way to construct our function in a way we can think of. It blows my mind to see ingenuity with full clarity and appreciating the trick he pulled because usually textbooks pull tricks and it isn’t full understood/appreciated bu I think the visuals and simple words he used really helped here. Wonderful video! Wonderful! Amazing! So cool! I like this much much much more than 3Blue1Brown which usually feels too fast and cramped and confusing.
I'm usually a casual viewer when it comes to math videos but man... videos like this makes you appreciate how beautiful math is. Really cool video, hoping to see more! :)
nit : 1:20 : A cleaner (imho) formulation for binary exponent sum is if we start from k=0. Then it's just 2^(n+1)-1. This is extremely insightful into the exponential nature of how the next term is just one added to the sum of everything that came before.
I love your teaching style! I hope you enjoyed making this video as much as I enjoyed watching it, cause if you keep up this level of quality, you WILL find success here 😁
It's beautiful, the intuition behind generalized harmonic numbers which is explained in video is pretty cool. Especially the idea that going to sufficiently large N and then noting the fact that H(N+x)=H(N) was really lovely. I am really curious to know the source of this.
1:12 I actually found a formula for general x^n and I think it is pretty elegant: (x+1)^n - x^n Expand x+1 using binomial Theorem x^n cancels Sum of consecutive differences gives general formula for x^n using terms exclusively up to x^(n-1) PS: I’m certain this is known but it’s just something cool I found and figured I’d share it
Damn this video is so impressive! Especially for the first video, it feels like the product quality matches 3b1b. I look forward to your future videos!
Great video! One thing I would have liked to see would be showing that the infinite sum you arrived at indeed gives the values of the harmonic series when x is an integer
Great video! Honestly this was presented so well I decided to go to wiki, and start deriving some of the stuff that was presented there as well as following the steps that were taken in this video. Really well done :)
This is exciting! One solution to "extend the harmonics" I came up with was to notice how 1/k would be a result of integrating x^(k-1) from 0 to 1. But how do we use this? Well, we write 1+1/2+1/3+...+1/n = integral (1+x+x^2+...+x^(n-1)) from 0 to 1. But what do we do with this? Then I realized, that there's a nice algebraic formula with a telescoping effect (try to expand the left-hand side yourself to see how almost everything cancels out!) (1+x+x^2+...+x^(n-1))(1-x) = (1-x^n) so H(x) = integral (1-t^x)/(1-t) for t from 0 to 1. I'm not sure if it gives the same values between the integers as your formula tho...to me, both extensions seem equally logical. I like my solution because it's easy to set it up as a numerical integral. I tried the value of 1/2, which is both easy to integrate and easy to find the sum for and the result is 2-ln(4) in both cases, so...yay? :D
This is a really good video! The pacing, narration, and animation are all very smooth and pleasant to watch. There's one piece of feedback I have, though this may be more a matter of my personal taste, so take it at your discretion. It's natural for someone who's familiar with maths to understand which of the arguments in the video are rigorous proofs and which are just natural-looking assumptions. However, I'm not sure that would be clear to everyone. I think it would be good to really underline the point that there's an infinite number of possible functions which connect the dots, but that _if_ we enforce the recursive relation and _if_ we assume the curve flattens out, _then_ we get the final function.
Since the function is a shifted version of the Digamma function, some intuition should come from what is known about that function. The answer is: very little! Apparently no analytical solution is known for its zeros.
Idk the math but from my experience I think the infinite sequence is within the 0 itself. The closer you get to infinity the slower you get to infinity, like adding a nine onto the end of "0.999...". Once you accept that the infinite repeating .9 can equal 1 the infinite sequence wraps back around on and through itself. It makes more sense if you overlay what's in this video with a hypertorus. Idk if I'm right, but that's what I visualize when I think about it. Let me know your thoughts
This is insanely good! Subscribed! Somewhat unrelated, but I have a video idea: proving that some functions have non-elementary antiderivatives and thus lack an analytical solution. Just throwing it out there... :)
So interesting, clear and smart, I've subscribed. Thanks! I'm not very involved in mathematics, although I acquired a senior engineering level half a century ago. But now I am involved in a theory of cognition and have had to re-learn lattices, ideals and filters. Unfortunately, I cannot find much material on the subject in TH-cam.
Thanks for watching everyone!
I obviously hoped to see a positive response, but I didn't think I'd actually get thousands of views on my first video! It makes me really happy to see so many people enjoying this topic. The Harmonic Numbers are the tip of an iceberg into some really cool math, and I hope to eventually share that whole journey on this channel.
I've been working on another (completely unrelated) video, but as I'm doing this between work and other personal projects, I can't give any estimates as to when it will be ready. I just wanted you to know that there definitely is more on the horizon!
oh yeah you gonna blow up. havent watched these kinds of videos in a while and youtube just puts you on my home page...pretty sure youre gonna have a huge spike of views (or just had and the algo still loves you)
been a pleasure to watch too
keep it up w these kind of videos, rlly good
You definitely deserve it, production quality is what matters in these kinds of explorations
Keep making content man, i will absolutely watch it all... love this kind of videos, already subscribed. Good job! 👍
Are you telling me the points don't follow a logarithm? I'm so disappointed.
Guys, get ready, we are literally witnessing the birth of a new legend in the math-educational TH-cam scene. This is going to be great, i can feel it
i agree
I feel so, too. It reminds me of when I first went crazy for 3b1b
I agree. He has everything 3blue1brown has.
no truer words were spoken.
This aged like milkshake
6:00 that pun was so good! sneaky, unobtrusive, and perfect in context. subscribed.
I didn’t even get it until you said something 😭 thanks
Can someone explain it? I couldn’t get it
@@vancedforU he refers to the "real magic" if the function because it extends the harmonics from the whole numbers to the real numbers. just well placed.
This was excellent. I've watched a lot of the SOME1 videos and this is easily one of the best. Do you expect to release any more anytime soon?
Thank you!!
I can't really make predictions on how soon, but I definitely have more in the works!
Great visualization, great pacing, interesting topic!
Dude, this video is one of the best produced math videos I’ve seen in a while! You have the elegant animations of 3Blue1Brown while also touching subjects I’m more interested in, so bravo, honestly! Keep up the good work, I’m excited to see what you have in store in the future!
Nice video. One very small point I would make would be at 10:55 on your justification of using a straight line for the interval, as opposed to some squiggly up and down one. I believe it would be better to justify it under the intuition that the harmonic functions extended to the reals should be a strictly increasing function, rather than the rather loose "it is the most natural. It's probably being overly pedantic, but mathematics is all about rigour
Even if you add the argument of strict increase, it is not necessary for the function to be a straight line, there still is some intuition to it. The argument probably should be that if f(x) does not change much also every derivative of f goes to 0. And even this is hard to proof as you can not do the limit of the difference quotient because you do not have infinetely close points for which the function is defined.
Anyways, as we are looking for a function that behaves kind of natural in some way, we can just take that as a definition of "natural": that every derivative disappears on the interval between arbitrarily close points.
(Now as I am writing this I wonder, if you could proof that under the condition, that every derivative should be continous in any point - but I am not enough of a mathematician to try that myself.)
@@ery5757 well for the really big numbers in order for it to be monotonically it needs to be close to a straight line, otherwise it would go above the second value/below the first. It may not be exactly but as you get bigger and bigger it gets closer and closer. This is expressed by the statement that for any x
lim[N->inf] H(N) - H(N + x) = 0
@@JGHFunRun Well the thing is that this does not hold for any x, but only for x
@@ery5757 yea um x was (heavily) implied to be finite when N explicitly goes to infinity. You’re being extremely pedantic and I’m not even sure why - for any finite x, x inf] N since N >> inf. Heck in the video he explicitly said something equivalent to “for very large N in relation to x” N>>x. Do you think the statement of “very large N in relation to x” stopped applying at some point? Because if so tell me where it stopped applying. I’ll wait
Oh, and if you really want to be pedantic it’s only if |x|
Yeah that part bothered me a bit too
When I first learned about sigma notation and the Riemann Zeta function, I spent the next 5 nights playing on Wolfram Alpha, and it was fun. It was very similar to what you've done here! Thanks for the connection with the digamma function, too, I never knew what that was.
Wau, that's pretty cool
(Another name for the archaic Greek letter "Wau" is "Digamma")
5 nights at wolfram alpha
how did you go from learning the sigma notation to learning the zeta function so fast? i learned sigma notation like 4 years ago, and i AM sure, that i wont be studying zeta function for atleast the next 3 years
@@therealtdp They probably heard of it from another video, prob not formally studying it but just playing around
I didn't even notice 15 minutes have gone by. That's how good you are at explaining things. Awesome, man! Keep going! The world needs more lucid explainers like you!
12:28 Math is crazy in a way that you can have an good intuition about every separate fact but when combined, knocks you back to the start and realize you don't really comprehend the whole story.
I am so glad for 3b1b's Summer of Math Exposition, great videos are popping up everywhere !
I discovered this while "discovering" the stamp collector's problem for myself. There's a fun approximation that's useful if you're trying to find how long it takes to get items from a random draw.
Wow! I used essentially this idea to find a continuous extension for the factorials! I know the gamma function already exists, but doing it this way gives you a different formula that happens to give you exactly the same thing as the gamma function. I never considered doing the same thing with other functions, so cool!
Amazing first video - I can't wait to see what's next!
Not taking into account the reasons why you'd prefer one notation over another, I think it's a bit curious though how computing the first numbers gets more and more difficult as you get further into this video - I mean at the start it is just evaluating fractions, and by the end you have to calculate an infinite sum!
Thank you!!
The infinite sum is great because you can take derivatives and integrals, and in general a bigger domain means more potential to find interesting patterns.
But if you ask me for H(20), there's no chance I'm adding infinite terms when I only need to do 20! (Plus, the sum converges pretty slowly, especially for larger numbers)
Oh! Can you can do calculus on sums? I always thought that was kind of a dead end!
It's still pretty nuts how do calculate the Nth harmonic, you have to add the first N reciprocals. Coming from a computer science background, I feel the best way to implement this would not be one of the mentioned formulas; a lookup table is too sparse, the classic definition gets too slow too quickly, and the summation takes too long to converge. I'm kinda baffled by how many ways there are do calculate this one thing!
@@zanzlanz i'd personally see whether the integral of the geometric series was viable (depending on how expensive non-integer powers are)
@@LinesThatConnect Well, of course you only need to calculate 20. After all, the sum telescopes for positive integer inputs.
@@zanzlanz You can do calculus on sums; you just have to make sure there aren't any shenanigans going on. It's like with mixed partial derivatives; usually they're equal, unless the function is going nuts at some point. (For more eye-glazing details, look up the Monotone Convergence and Dominated Convergence Theorems.)
As for calculating harmonic numbers, there are asymptotic expansions which work pretty well. For example, H(n) is about ln n + gamma + 1/2n - 1/12n² + 1/120n⁴, where gamma is the Euler-Mascheroni Constant. You can continue extending this approximation, but unfortunately for any finite n the terms start getting larger after some point (this is a general problem with asymptotic series). However, the computational advantages are enormous. Finding the billionth harmonic number by summation would take literally billions of calculations and only give you about eight places of accuracy past the decimal point; the above formula (with a previously calculated value of gamma) yield over fifty places after the decimal point (the first omitted term is of order 1/n⁶, or one part in 10⁵⁴).
Damn, I am a high schooler who is interested in maths. Gamma-function, Digamma function, harmonic numbers and extension of series from integers to real(and complex) numbers are definitely one of my favorite topics. Honestly, this is the best video about harmonic numbers I’ve seen so far.
As someone who's interested in somewhat niche generalizations like this, this video was really interesting! It was very well explained and visualized and easy to understand
Got excited that I'd found a new cool maths channel. Got disappointed when I realized it's only your first video. Got excited again when I realized it's only your first video. Please keep it up!
Next step: generalize it to complex numbers
Then find all the zeros
The same formula works
To actually see it try plotting it in geogebra it's just like desmos but I personally love it more just type psi(x+1) -psi(1) and it will graph it for you ❤
the digamma function works in the complex plane its just harder to compute
What the sigma notation
Wow, I rarely find a new channel to which I’d like to subscribe, but I’ve «never» been so quick to hit the bell icon too. 0: Extraordinary success lays just over the horizon for this channel. Keep it up!!
Nice! Though we *can* get H(0) = 0 from the original sum-of-reciprocals definition too: for that case the sum has no terms, and an empty sum equals zero (likewise an empty product equals one). Don’t be afraid that the sum is “from 1 to 0” in that case-that’s equivalent to being from 1 inclusive to 1 exclusive, which then makes more sense to have zero terms in it.
I plugged the formula into Desmos on my phone and it crashed lol
Absolute brilliant video, I love those exploration videos that take you through a journey of discovery. And this video does it perfectly. Can’t wait for the next video
I can see that you took great effort in making sure that every step and intention behind it is clearly conveyed. When you're an expert yourself, it's hard to know what steps would be difficult to digest from a novice point of view. I enjoyed watching this video very much.
I read the title and thought about it for a day and came up with a different extension H(x)= integral of (1-t^x)/(1-t) for t from 0 to 1. And then I learned the completely different approach from the video. Time to try proving they are equal haha...
Btw, a missed opportunity of actually computing H(0.5). I think it is 2-log4
That’s it, I’m binging this entire channel.
I love this kind of "extension" video. Keep them coming
Size does matter, doesn't it?
It was hard for me to silence the voice in my head screaming "It's just a natural log! Use an integral approximation!", but this was definitely worth it! Great video :)
"Just a log"?
Euler-Mascheroni-constant: "Am I nothing to you?"
It's in the name: integral _approximation_
I'm very happy that the summer of math is/was a thing there are so many really exellent videos emerging recently (and especially also so many new great people doing interesting educational videos). I really hope more people see this as I find it very well made
Excellent video! Watched through the end, I was basically hypnotized by the quality of the manim animations!!! So cool!!! Keep up the good work
You are a great narrator, I never was excited about sums that much before.
the quality of this is astounding, i've never subbed to a channel this quickly.
This is excellent! And the first video on this channel? This sort of thing has a sizeable audience, I'm sure, and it's distinct from what I'm seen elsewhere. Keep it up!
Beautiful animation, great explanation, fantastic video!
Can't wait to see more of you
That's a great observation about it extending the domain. Seen that formula many times and literally never thought of it that way.
Hi,
I have watched nearly all of 3blue1brown's videos, and yet I still think yours was one of the best I have ever encountered. I am *begging* you to upload another one, you could easily match 3b1b's videos in quality, and you in fact already did, if not better. TH-cam lacks great content like yours
You have explained the generalization of the Harmonic function so well that I can't wait for your explanation of the Riemann zeta function.
But take your time and do it right.
The highlight of the beauty of his articulation skills in this video was the part where he explained how there is a well-defined value for x=1/2 at very very large N since there is a smooth line meaning things are approximately the same (especially knowing about limits from calc) then he visually showed taking regular intervals back from the recursive relation meaning we have a value at every step of the way. It’s amazing! I have gained a lot from this experience. I now see mathematics more as a puzzle where we are trying to think about a very clever way to construct our function in a way we can think of. It blows my mind to see ingenuity with full clarity and appreciating the trick he pulled because usually textbooks pull tricks and it isn’t full understood/appreciated bu I think the visuals and simple words he used really helped here. Wonderful video! Wonderful! Amazing! So cool! I like this much much much more than 3Blue1Brown which usually feels too fast and cramped and confusing.
I even liked my own comment. Wonderful video! Very easy to digest!
Really great video. Good luck with SoME!
Thanks mate, It was really informative and the way you presented it felt quite intuitive. Keep up the great work. Waiting for the rest of your videos.
Wonderfully made, You sir have earned my subscription, I really hope to see more from you
Nice work. Can’t wait for next episode…
That thumbnail is perfection
Great video too
I'm usually a casual viewer when it comes to math videos but man... videos like this makes you appreciate how beautiful math is. Really cool video, hoping to see more! :)
Excellent video. Looking forward to future content
You absolutely need to make more videos like this you are unbelievably amazing ❤
This was great. Pretty sure this is the first time I've subscribed to a channel that has only one video!
Please make more videos like this. I want to know the mystery behind why graphs look the way they look for particular equations. This is amazing
nit : 1:20 : A cleaner (imho) formulation for binary exponent sum is if we start from k=0. Then it's just 2^(n+1)-1.
This is extremely insightful into the exponential nature of how the next term is just one added to the sum of everything that came before.
I love your teaching style! I hope you enjoyed making this video as much as I enjoyed watching it, cause if you keep up this level of quality, you WILL find success here 😁
It's beautiful, the intuition behind generalized harmonic numbers which is explained in video is pretty cool. Especially the idea that going to sufficiently large N and then noting the fact that H(N+x)=H(N) was really lovely. I am really curious to know the source of this.
1:12
I actually found a formula for general x^n and I think it is pretty elegant:
(x+1)^n - x^n
Expand x+1 using binomial Theorem
x^n cancels
Sum of consecutive differences gives general formula for x^n using terms exclusively up to x^(n-1)
PS: I’m certain this is known but it’s just something cool I found and figured I’d share it
On paper, I knew how to derive this infinite sum. But this video did a fantastic job of making it much more intuitive. Well done.
Amazing video! Good job, I can’t believe it’s your first one! Keep it up man, I’ll be coming back for more!
Cannot believe this channel is so underrated. Keep working, and you'll be famous.
This is the best summer of math video! It deserves to win
Обожаю после просмотра заходить в Desmos и смотреть, как работают эти формулы :D
I'll be waiting for the next one just to hear that outro again
Damn this video is so impressive! Especially for the first video, it feels like the product quality matches 3b1b. I look forward to your future videos!
Great video! One thing I would have liked to see would be showing that the infinite sum you arrived at indeed gives the values of the harmonic series when x is an integer
Yeah, but for integers, the fractions cancel until you're left with the original definition.
Great start to your channel. Interesting topic, top class qualify. Subscribed and notification set in anticipation of the next one!
Very well explained. I am amazed about the influence of infinitesimals in modern math.
Brilliant man, you are not showing math but how to think and investigate thats more important than the math fact itself
Please make more...
this video and this channel are amazing, from france : congratulations for your job
When your videos blow up, I can tell everyone, that I was your 14th Subscriber
Wow! What a great watch! Thanks so much for putting this together!
This is amazing, and I'm really excited to see you're upcoming videos
Absolutely amazing video!
First SoME1 video I could actually understand!
My new favourite channel.
great work. can’t wait for the next one!
dude you should have won the contest. I've seen all the winning videos and there's some steep competition but this should have been top 5.
Favourite SoME1 video I've seen so far, really really good video 🥳🥳🥳🥳
Great video! Honestly this was presented so well I decided to go to wiki, and start deriving some of the stuff that was presented there as well as following the steps that were taken in this video. Really well done :)
This video was great! On par with (or maybe even better) than a 3blue1brown vid!
Neat👍😎
Amen to that
Wonderful!! More videos, please! :)
Great video! Looking forward to seeing more from this channel.
You deserve more subscribers, this video is extremely well made!
This is exciting! One solution to "extend the harmonics" I came up with was to notice how 1/k would be a result of integrating x^(k-1) from 0 to 1. But how do we use this? Well, we write
1+1/2+1/3+...+1/n = integral (1+x+x^2+...+x^(n-1)) from 0 to 1. But what do we do with this? Then I realized, that there's a nice algebraic formula with a telescoping effect (try to expand the left-hand side yourself to see how almost everything cancels out!)
(1+x+x^2+...+x^(n-1))(1-x) = (1-x^n)
so H(x) = integral (1-t^x)/(1-t) for t from 0 to 1. I'm not sure if it gives the same values between the integers as your formula tho...to me, both extensions seem equally logical. I like my solution because it's easy to set it up as a numerical integral.
I tried the value of 1/2, which is both easy to integrate and easy to find the sum for and the result is 2-ln(4) in both cases, so...yay? :D
This is a really good video! The pacing, narration, and animation are all very smooth and pleasant to watch.
There's one piece of feedback I have, though this may be more a matter of my personal taste, so take it at your discretion. It's natural for someone who's familiar with maths to understand which of the arguments in the video are rigorous proofs and which are just natural-looking assumptions. However, I'm not sure that would be clear to everyone. I think it would be good to really underline the point that there's an infinite number of possible functions which connect the dots, but that _if_ we enforce the recursive relation and _if_ we assume the curve flattens out, _then_ we get the final function.
Imagine going to infinity + 0.5 only to come all the way back to determine the precise value of H(0.5). Amazing!
Amazing video! Extremely clear explanation and a very well chosen topic. Simple yet extremely slick arguments. Subbed!
Thank you, i've been wondering for like half a year why it's limit goes to infinity and finally i found the answer ty
Any thought about where the zeros of this function are? Clearly, H(0) = 0 and, for all of the rest of them, x
Since the function is a shifted version of the Digamma function, some intuition should come from what is known about that function. The answer is: very little! Apparently no analytical solution is known for its zeros.
OK
You mean x approaches -infinty, cause as far as I can tell for x to infinity H(x) approaches infinity, without ever crossing the x-axis again.
Idk the math but from my experience I think the infinite sequence is within the 0 itself. The closer you get to infinity the slower you get to infinity, like adding a nine onto the end of "0.999...". Once you accept that the infinite repeating .9 can equal 1 the infinite sequence wraps back around on and through itself.
It makes more sense if you overlay what's in this video with a hypertorus.
Idk if I'm right, but that's what I visualize when I think about it. Let me know your thoughts
@@Ivan.Wright I think you may have misunderstood the question. The question is, for what values of x is H(x) = 0.
Can I just say, the thumbnail is godlike
That limit function really put a smile on my face.
Holy shit! This video is amazing and surprisingly enough this is your first video... 3blue1brown quality level
That's such a cool trick to understand intuitively, you made it very simple. I hope you plan to make more videos like this!
This is insanely good! Subscribed!
Somewhat unrelated, but I have a video idea: proving that some functions have non-elementary antiderivatives and thus lack an analytical solution. Just throwing it out there... :)
Very nicely done. Looking forward to more!
this is now my favorite math video!
Wonderfully explained, math is so beautiful. Looking forward to your new content, you'll surely make it big!
Just found you today and I honestly loved the video, I hope to see more in the future.
This is an excellent video, well presented and well explained. I'm looking forward to your future videos.
THOU SHOWED ME THE TRUE BEAUTY OF MATHEMATICS!!!!!😊
Great video! Really informative! I’m excited to see what you do in the future!
That was very well done. I'm looking forward to going back and watching more of your other videos.
Wicked animations. Loved the video!
I'm SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO in love bro, i love this, this came handy to motivate me learn those series i have a course on
You're a legend. Kudos to you!
So interesting, clear and smart, I've subscribed. Thanks!
I'm not very involved in mathematics, although I acquired a senior engineering level half a century ago. But now I am involved in a theory of cognition and have had to re-learn lattices, ideals and filters. Unfortunately, I cannot find much material on the subject in TH-cam.