Inam Ul Haq I don't think Niels Bohr was Jewish. I've red his biography and got a sense that he was an atheist. Also I must note Einstein's belief that the quantum world was pre-determined, was due to him believing in God, while Bohr's theory predicted it was randomness, meaning nothing is pre-deterministic hence thre is no higher power.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 but homework is not a subatomic particle. Albert Einstein said that what applies for subatomic particles should be applicable for larger particles too. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Uncertainty principle is like taking a photo: You can (with short exposure) see the object clearly where it is, but you have no idea whether it was moving. Or you can (with long exposure) see a smudge on the photo, the longer it is (given the same exposure), the faster it was moving, but you can't see the object distinctly in any position. I know the analogy is quite far from the real quantum stuff of Heisenberg's principle, but it's close enough for the laymen we are
Heisenberg is driving along at high speed, when a traffic cop pulls him over; "Sir, Do you know you were driving over the speed limit? 90 kph to be exact! " " Oh great!" says Heisenberg. " Now I'm completely lost!"
I heard a different version of this joke: Heisenberg get pulled over for speeding and the cop asks him if he knew what speed he was doing, Heisenberg answers, "No, but I know exactly where I am!" LOL
Which was all they could do at the time without many instruments, or accurate ones. They pushed observations backed by conjecture as far as they could.
Actually, it was a regular conversation for them. Einstein spent 8 years of just digging that topic to propose the general theory of relativity, he was at pretty bad health as he was almost all the time just studying this particular theory.
We can apply this to climate science, also. If anyone says he knows (even roughly) what the average Earth temp will be in a decade, he is either lying, or a fool. We can go further, if he says he knowsall about the climate system, or even enough to make a prediction, or even on Earth's climate sensitivity (to CO2), or the end result of feedbacks. Any yet...climate scientists and physicists can't go a month without making this stuff up. And they get away with it because of the political climate.
Isn't the uncertainty principle simply from the wave picture of particles, since for wave-like systems in order to have a definite location in the configuration space you need to add a very large wavenumber span of plane waves together?
@@exhalerwolf1272 For me at class 11 According to my syllabus there was only short definition and formula about uncertainty principle But my teacher taught me in detail and assigned students to research about it,but I was lazy
@@mridulkalita3099 ikr he is lit he is just as lit as einstein just that he couldnt rise up to the fame as much as einstein did he literally made a system that was so great with so little flaws like 2% or so which was later on corrected to be orbitals can u imagine that just think of the power of his imagination that too he did that during epidemic in just one year over the most complicated matter that startled everyone for years he is a GENIUS
@@ViratKohli-jj3wj linking to subreddits outside of reddit... Also, it wasn't a wooosh. It's clear Abdullah understood that John referenced that Bohr saved Einstein in this video but wanted to expand on why in the real world Bohr did so much for us. In particular the Copenhagen interpretation and the first hydrogen atom model which later led to the full formulation of Quantum Mechanics.
The goal of scientific pursuit should not be merely to make use of the world around us. It should be to understand it fundamentally, no matter what use it might have. He said it !!!
That is to say nature defies common sense. Notions of "common sense" would have to be re-evaluated if they don't abide by logic. Also, Einstein was wrong on this.
Common sense is what we believe about the macro world around us, as a result of experiencing it every day. You might say experience *defines* common sense. Common sense *defies* reality.
TH-cam's uncertainty principle: If you scroll through the comment section, you will not be able to see the video. But if you see the video, you won't be able to scroll through the comment section.
I would've loved to have lived in this neighbourhood. Imagine going to an everyday local store and standing in line and then finding Einstein just having a normal conversation about quantum physics while ordering a large pumpkin spice latte.
According to this video things which are not visible to us uncertainty principle follows on them so if car is not visible uncertainty can be applied on them this is called quantum theory..
Actually uncertainty principle is correct but Einstein used it in cars case where the uncertainty is so less because of the mass of the car that it can be totally neglected.but in case of electron it should be taken in confederation as the mass is of the order10^-31
You are right, but still doesn't explain the doubt that Einstein has which is of the logic used to deal with the quantum world. So what he is saying is "there must be soemthing else which is more logical, therefore more correct" now whether he is right or not that's a different story.
durgesh jhariya Hahahaha you will be stuck in this prison forever and never escape! Also it’s made out of graphite and thick, so you won’t just shrink between the atoms. Have fun! (shrinks to size of quark) (pops out) What the? I HATE QUANTUM TUNNELING!
Einstein was very much against Quantum Mechanics. Not only for the fact he believed _God doesn't play dice_ , but because of the sheer non-intuitive nature it presented at the time. Kinda ironic when you consider he was the one to explain the photoelectric effect. Well, I don't remember right now if he ever gave in.
Laiba IQBAL It’s something Einstein said as a reaction to the nature of Quantum mechanics which states that you cannot know exactly where something is, only a probability that it is there. This was against Einstein’s intuition, but Bohr and others eventually proved it was correct. While Einstein was right about a great many things, he was wrong about QM. I like to think however, that were he alive today, he would be quietly pleased that someone proved him wrong.
@@laibaiqbal158 playing the dice means quantization, thing is only allowed somewhere or it can only have a specific value Like, an electron is quantized, it can't just go anywhere (like in the nucleus and that we have nodal planes) At the same the electon cloud that we have is also a probability density We know the places where electron can never be and places where can just give probability just like the probability of playing a dice
Every scientist made a significant contribution to the scientific world even if all the points ain't right still we should look at the things that were unimaginable to our common minds and provided a path though to led the afterward discoveries...Respect for all☺
@@b11-x3o Take the second dominant trough in infrared mineral spectral, correlate it to refractive index at 8cm spacing. What do you get? A match sometimes. Go to 2cm spacing, what do you get? An exact match. So pattern identification can be dependent on resolution of the measurement. What is the standard in mineralogical infrared research? 8cm. Oh, so 75 years and they see nothing. Okay. This is your science. Undersampling resolution can lead to sporadic identification and false quanta expectations.
@@curious_banda Your are confusing cause with effect and equivalencing them. Aliasing is from undersampling, and that undersampling is probably the cause of quantization phenomena. You also fail to understand that quanta are not a natural state and neither are so-called physical constants. How are they achieved? For you, the cause is magic. For me, it takes a force that is energy to enforce quantization and constants in systems. It takes a regulator. If you cannot find the enforcer/regulator of the quanta system and constants, then you don't have a grasp of the system or there is no quanta or constant. 1800s physical constants are not natural things, they are placeholders to equivalence equations and define behaviors with improper and incomplete equations.
" the goal of scientific pursuit should not be merely to make use of things around us but to understand it, fundamentally" ...it's just made my day :)))
This show false tho. Einstein was one of the founders of quantum mechanics, he won his nobel prize for his paper on the photoelectric effect in 1905 and he discovered brownian motion. Everything that is said in this scene is completely false, it's funny to see how everyone in the comment section is using this to dissect one of the most brilliant scientist we have had. Lol. Maybe people here should go to google scholar, type in einstein and read some of his papers. That is, if you can.
Time Travel Rules 1. Only observe don't change history. 2. Wear chothes from that time period. 3. Only spend 2 mins in the past to prevent any mistakes that would change history. 4. If history is changed by mistake go back and change it back. 5. Find a hide out so the time machine doesn't fall into the wrong hand's.
Nah, I don't think the universe would allow you to change history so much that you cease to exist. Another thing to add to your list would be. If you do anything, remeber the butterfly effect.
Well actually this is real. This isn't a joke. It's not about the quantum world. If you aren't conscious of a thing, it isn't existing relative to you. As everything is relative, other people who are conscious of your school must have the school relative to them as existing, but not your relative school will exist.
When I teach the uncertainty principle to my high school students I use the analogy of a pool table in the dark. You can hear a collision and can guess where the ball was... but where it ends up is a mystery. You can estimate the speed of the collision based on the volume of the clank...Its not perfect but it helps.
I love this, im reading a book about this just now!! It's so incredible that this book is from 1989 and the topic from the book is mentioned here! So cool!!
its not einsteins fault that he almost got hit by the car, it was simply going so fast that it would have been impossible for him to accurately determain its position
The flaw in Einstein's logic is the fact that he expected the universe to obey his idea of common sense. As the person who developed relativity I'd hoped he would be more open minded. In my mind the idea that subatomic particles disobey what we see in normal life makes even more sense than the idea that time disobeys what we see in normal life at high speeds/other circumstances.
@CluelessAmerican he was not really skeptic, he refused to believed it even though there were many scientific researchs about quantum physics, about life being probabilistic (theoretically), because it makes absolutely no sense if you think of it normally. But in the end, his objections turn out to be a huge evidence for the importance of quantum physics.
Einstein was also one of the people to develop quantum mechanics (His paper on the photoelectric effect). His problem with quantum mechanics was entirely due to his belief in things like energy conservation, momentum conservation, among others. A weaker mind would abandon these concepts when it comes to quantum mechanics, whereas Einstein tried to reconsile the two… Hence his objections.
"well, then, if you don't start using your brain to observe what's right in front of you, you're going to get yourself killed", everyone says that to me cause I am always lost in my thoughts half the time thinking about random things that do not make sense
True scientists know that tesla wasn't a true genius. He was a crackpot who refuted general relativity on the grounds that 'The math was complicated'. He was an engineer to begin with.
Good God! I cannot accept that. Picasso - really? Not at all a worthwhile selection. I have nothing against Picasso, but when season one is Einstein, season two cannot be Pablo; the bar is just too high. Feynman! Now there would be a good series! Such an enjoyable one, too; a true genius with such a story, so many pranks and asides and so much good humor.
"the goal of scientific pursuit should not be merely to make use of the world around us, it should be to understand it, fundamentally." I absolutely agree
The biggest challenge is combining the theory of relativity with quantum-mechanics. Seeing as quantum-mechanics is one of the most accurate theories ever created in explaining reality, however is unable to explain gravity. Scientists like Einstein and Planck never fully accepted it, their view was that the theory could be valid, but only in a deterministic equation, or that it only explained a certain part of the theory of everything. And there are deterministic views of quantum theory like the multi-verse one.
Okay so if we don’t see particles , they won’t exist : my question is how are the collisions between particles happening around us and creating atmospheric pressure if we don’t see it ?. Collisions are happening that means they exist , chemical reactions are happening that means particles exist if we see it or not , chemical reactions were happening when humans didn’t exist , when Big Bang happened many things happened and we were nit there to witness it , how does particles don’t exist then ? Unless there is something else involved other than particles if this theory is proved. 1:39
it's not true that they don't exist. they do not have "local realism" so they don't have a specific value for spin etc. as they travel. but they exist, in the theory they exist
@@philasogwa8875 An obsever is must for the universe to exist for example the universe in your dream doesn't exist without you, Universe doesn't exist without God & conscious observers.
@@philasogwa8875 Possibly after your death car will drive over you & you are a ghost 👻 nothing happens to you at all.. That's the base reality called God, Consciousness & Universe itself..
Well, it was a brand NEW concept. And waaaaay out of the box. Einstei has a few GOOD arguments - within the realm of Classical Mechanics. The quantum people really did not know how to answer some of them. Nowadays, it is better understood. There are better answers to those questions. Those questions actually make sense and are intelligent questions.
I am dumbstruck and speechless after each episode ends. unmoved with impact of presentation. this series is an institution by it self and benchmark for all the departments of involved in movie making. acting and micro level expression is so classic that i see all repeated episode in week. This is Master piece teamwork
Quantum mechanics doesn’t state that the particle “doesn’t exist” until it is measured. It states that whatever property you’re measuring (eg. position) is in a superposition of states until the moment you measure it, when it undergoes a “wave function collapse”. It’s a mathematical way to represent a physical process that is fundamentally indeterministic. That’s what Einstein disliked - and so does pretty much everyone - the idea that nature is indeterministic at a micro scale, but perfectly deterministic at a macro scale. Conversely, there are examples where chaotic systems can be made “less” chaotic when introducing the indeterminism of quantum mechanics - for example the “kicked rotor”. The distributed nature of subatomic wave functions may actually help “calm” chaotic systems as we zoom out to a macro scale.
"The goal of scientific pursuit should not be merely to make use of the world around us." -- That pretty much sums up why they say that physicists hate engineers.
Einstein had hard time hanging up with these ideas of Heisenberg and neils bohr Quantam entanglement and quantum theory was like a joke to him He even didn't approve the theory but now we know now that Einstein was wrong in his thoughts about quantum theory and Heisenberg was right
Unfortunately there was no book for Einstein to read. Quantum mechanics was at its basics in1927 it only came into full after Schrodinger explained his theory on how electrons would not follow the rules of the physical macroscopic world. Imagine yourself his entering into the realm of quantum mechanics (u can't do thought experiments or follow the rules of physics which govern physical world since the dawn of newton). It's quite and eccentric theory that quantum mechanics
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle led us to view the quantum world as one that favors probability over certainty. This also led to a "battle of titans": For Bohr, we lack the language to understand the quantum world, but for Einstein, God does not play dice with the universe.
I were used to get what the Einstein says , though i havent learned that neiter ar school nor myself i just knew it before. But the Heisenbergs uncertainty makes me think a lot.
Just imagining going back in past and giving lectures in all fields of physics and Your words will be written by those legendary scientists on their diary🤣🤣🤣
Just imagine hanging out with these legendary scientists...
Riju Chaudhuri it would be one of the best experience of my life
But i have few friends like this they and i always hang out like this
Inam Ul Haq I don't think Niels Bohr was Jewish. I've red his biography and got a sense that he was an atheist. Also I must note Einstein's belief that the quantum world was pre-determined, was due to him believing in God, while Bohr's theory predicted it was randomness, meaning nothing is pre-deterministic hence thre is no higher power.
Inam Ul Haq So what? Brian Green and Laurence Krauss were born into Jewish families as well. What's your point here?
What does being have to Jewish have to do anything with this? It never should have been brought up in the first place
Inam Ul Haq lol
Teacher: Where is your homework?
Me: I didn't see it, so it never existed.
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!
🤣🤣🤣🤣 but homework is not a subatomic particle.
Albert Einstein said that what applies for subatomic particles should be applicable for larger particles too.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Wrongg you didn't do it so it never existed
HAHAHAHAHA
@@jefflee6393 a better way to say it...
Uncertainty principle is like taking a photo:
You can (with short exposure) see the object clearly where it is, but you have no idea whether it was moving.
Or you can (with long exposure) see a smudge on the photo, the longer it is (given the same exposure), the faster it was moving, but you can't see the object distinctly in any position.
I know the analogy is quite far from the real quantum stuff of Heisenberg's principle, but it's close enough for the laymen we are
I like this!
That was really good! Don't sell yourself short.
Now that is the best comment I read on this stupid machine. EVER !!!!
YOU'RE SO SMART
That's a brilliant, brilliant analogy. I'm gonna use that if someone asks me to explain it
Heisenberg is driving along at high speed, when a traffic cop pulls him over;
"Sir, Do you know you were driving over the speed limit? 90 kph to be exact! "
" Oh great!" says Heisenberg. " Now I'm completely lost!"
I heard a different version of this joke: Heisenberg get pulled over for speeding and the cop asks him if he knew what speed he was doing, Heisenberg answers, "No, but I know exactly where I am!" LOL
Better joke would be cop Him over and says excuse me sir, do you know how fast you were going? Reply: nope, but I know where I'm at!!!
Sorry guys, but smkh's version of this joke works better. Causes you to think a bit.
@@pbase36 I agree! :)
This made me chuckle 😊
I love how they’re dissecting the fundamentals of the universe as if it’s a regular conversation for them
T r u e
we can also dissect. lets start :P
Which was all they could do at the time without many instruments, or accurate ones. They pushed observations backed by conjecture as far as they could.
I love talking like that way with my friend 🥰
Actually, it was a regular conversation for them. Einstein spent 8 years of just digging that topic to propose the general theory of relativity, he was at pretty bad health as he was almost all the time just studying this particular theory.
Einstein be like:
"I'm quite *uncertain* about *The* *Uncertainty* *Principle* "
Lol
@Our ship Barham Take 50 cents..
Our ship Barham Jesus Christ
LOL
@@soumyaneelmukherjee11b58 u r here.
“If anyone says that he knows everything about universe then either he is lying or he is a fool."
- Neil Bohr
This was not true statement..
@@reddondaroo6075 That's true Einstein too was challenged by Hawking.... And still cosmos goes on
But we cannot be certain about that.!
We can apply this to climate science, also. If anyone says he knows (even roughly) what the average Earth temp will be in a decade, he is either lying, or a fool. We can go further, if he says he knowsall about the climate system, or even enough to make a prediction, or even on Earth's climate sensitivity (to CO2), or the end result of feedbacks.
Any yet...climate scientists and physicists can't go a month without making this stuff up. And they get away with it because of the political climate.
Did Neil know somebody that said he knew everything about the universe?
To be honest, Neils got a point, “Automobiles aren’t subatomic particles”
But they do have subatomic particles.
@@mylifephysics.8929 What is the chance that the automobile will pass through you with quantum tunneling?
@@Crusher29 That's the biggest quest I am on.
Blz Albert Einstein has power to imagine any thing in the world less than 50 second that is make a Albert great or true genius
@@mylifephysics.8929 its impossible for an automobile.
Its sad how casually these things are taught to us in college.
And it's even sadder how most university professors don't understand them, yet expect to 'reinforce our knowledge' through testing.
Isn't the uncertainty principle simply from the wave picture of particles, since for wave-like systems in order to have a definite location in the configuration space you need to add a very large wavenumber span of plane waves together?
So true. I only learned how to answer the questions in exam and related calculations. The actual theory I learned from books and TH-cam videos lol.
oh my god ikr
@@exhalerwolf1272 For me at class 11
According to my syllabus there was only short definition and formula about uncertainty principle
But my teacher taught me in detail and assigned students to research about it,but I was lazy
"Chemistry is the study of matter, but i prefer to see it as the study of change"
- Heisenberg (2)
When someone tells Einstein he has to use his brain
Not just someone..Neils Bohr!!
Bro it's Neil's Bohr...he was also one of the great genius scientist of all time..
@@mridulkalita3099 ikr he is lit he is just as lit as einstein just that he couldnt rise up to the fame as much as einstein did he literally made a system that was so great with so little flaws like 2% or so which was later on corrected to be orbitals can u imagine that just think of the power of his imagination that too he did that during epidemic in just one year over the most complicated matter that startled everyone for years he is a GENIUS
@@aformula4198 wait I thought they were archenemies then why are they together? or was this before the great debate?
@@ejmtv3 They had an academic disagreement which led to discuss..Not "enemies"
1:20 the world owes a lot to Dr. Bohr xD
lol
Ohh you don't even know the half of it. Try researching the guy
@@abdqs853 r/woooosh
@@ViratKohli-jj3wj linking to subreddits outside of reddit...
Also, it wasn't a wooosh. It's clear Abdullah understood that John referenced that Bohr saved Einstein in this video but wanted to expand on why in the real world Bohr did so much for us.
In particular the Copenhagen interpretation and the first hydrogen atom model which later led to the full formulation of Quantum Mechanics.
Haha it is just 1% .
The best thing Einstein ever said was, “Compound interest is the 8th wonder of the world. He who understands it, earns it; he who doesn't, pays it.”!!
Are you finance/commerce student lol... Trying to find relevance with Einstein
@@anuj8825 No a project manager. But, at the same time - someone who doesn't want to pay more money than he has to.
So basically Einstein was Jew. Oof, incredible
anuj- coder Einstein did say that lol
I don't think so ,in my opinion the best thing he had said is when someone asked him that how it feels to be genius he replied ask Tesla.
The goal of scientific pursuit should not be merely to make use of the world around us. It should be to understand it fundamentally, no matter what use it might have. He said it !!!
What did i learn from this video is:
Neils Bohr once saved Albert Einstein's life😁
It was Neils Bohr who said that electron revolves around the nucleus in a well defined path.
I got to know that they are from same timeline lol
@@Enthalpy-- He never said "revolves around."
@@Enthalpy-- 8th or 9th standard physics
@@abhinavraj4845 He said bruh
Einstein's logic is right. But quantum mechanics defies common sense.
That is to say nature defies common sense. Notions of "common sense" would have to be re-evaluated if they don't abide by logic. Also, Einstein was wrong on this.
Not only that, it is addressed later by Erwin Schrodinger's own thought experiment, known as the famous Scrodinger's cat.
The universe has no obligation to make sense to what we petty humans concider common sense
Common sense is what we believe about the macro world around us, as a result of experiencing it every day.
You might say experience *defines* common sense.
Common sense *defies* reality.
Imagine if Einstein had expertise in Quantum Physics. He would surely have revolutionized it just like modern physics 100 years ahead in time.
Why I learn everything from TH-cam and not from my school?
Same me2😂😂
Reghuram Karunamurthy 😂😂
Maybe your teacher's voice is an unpleasant sound, that is, a random mix of different sound waves, it also happens to me also
Because they teach you how to pass the test, not to actually learn
Because schools are useless .
Internet (if used it correctly) is much more useful!
Ghaddafi was a pretty smart guy...
camos he looks like gaddafi😁
LMAO
He was smarter than 🙄SOME people.
*old joke but worth mentioning
He might was smarter than 🙄SOME people.
*old joke but worth mentioning
😂
TH-cam's uncertainty principle:
If you scroll through the comment section, you will not be able to see the video. But if you see the video, you won't be able to scroll through the comment section.
It is not applicable for TH-cam app in mobile phone?
@@universe1focus985 yeh multitasking is dame some researches say
@@universe1focus985 and hence it is another Uncertainty
Simple but yet very effectively explained same theory as uncertainty
Use two devices
The Scientific rivalry between Einstein and Neil’s Bohr was an amazing one..
I would've loved to have lived in this neighbourhood.
Imagine going to an everyday local store and standing in line and then finding Einstein just having a normal conversation about quantum physics while ordering a large pumpkin spice latte.
You would have thought "this guy is crazy" because of your clouded judgement originating from your common sense
A pumpkin spice latte is an aberration harder to comprehend than quantum physics.
According to this video things which are not visible to us uncertainty principle follows on them so if car is not visible uncertainty can be applied on them this is called quantum theory..
@@abc67 hahaha
"Sit with the winners, the conversation is different."
I think I liked this, but I can't be sure.
genius.
you can only be sure that you like this if you don't know what it is, but you can be sure you don't like this if you know what it is
You liked it because you are a subatomic particle floating in the Cyber space at high velocity
That's an underrated comment
Look at the thumbs up button, if its blue, it means you liked it
I guess everyone in this comment section is an Oxford graduate Mathematician
you mean physicist. mathematicians don’t know this.
@@Sara-ji6xv r/wooooosh
@@Sara-ji6xv really?
Spotted another science professional from Stanford University 😂
9 class students too
I'm a high schooler
Einstein: “Why should I?”
So lit 🔥
Yashraj mukhaute huh
Actually uncertainty principle is correct but Einstein used it in cars case where the uncertainty is so less because of the mass of the car that it can be totally neglected.but in case of electron it should be taken in confederation as the mass is of the order10^-31
*consideration
You are right, but still doesn't explain the doubt that Einstein has which is of the logic used to deal with the quantum world. So what he is saying is "there must be soemthing else which is more logical, therefore more correct" now whether he is right or not that's a different story.
Yes u r right..
I like turtles
But everything is made of atoms and they have electrons, so why not the cars ? It's got nothing to do with Mass but relativity.
If quantum mechanics hasn't profoundly shocked you,you haven't understood it yet
if you think you understand quantum mechanics, you have only hit the tip of the iceberg
I think this is a linr of Neils Bhor ....maybe i am not certain about it
Not even Einstein could understand it
@@shwetasingh7621 Einstein quoted it
these are all your opinions
quantum mechanics is more weird then macroscopic world.
durgesh jhariya
Hahahaha you will be stuck in this prison forever and never escape!
Also it’s made out of graphite and thick, so you won’t just shrink between the atoms.
Have fun!
(shrinks to size of quark)
(pops out)
What the?
I HATE QUANTUM TUNNELING!
Particle in a box
C
@@sciblastofficial9833 I'm sorry to pop your bubble but that's not how quantum tunneling works.
Schrödinger's cat
How ?
This was the time when all those things were discovered which we study in our books Nowdays.
Getting hit by a car IS observing the car.
de moment we nearly lost Einstein 😂😂
Is this real history?
Probably
ToxicPaad *the
He did it intentionally.
Ok
I think this is the most Intressting debate in the history of science.
Einstein was very much against Quantum Mechanics. Not only for the fact he believed _God doesn't play dice_ , but because of the sheer non-intuitive nature it presented at the time.
Kinda ironic when you consider he was the one to explain the photoelectric effect.
Well, I don't remember right now if he ever gave in.
God doesnt play a dice....plz elaborate what that exactly means....plzzz
Laiba IQBAL It’s something Einstein said as a reaction to the nature of Quantum mechanics which states that you cannot know exactly where something is, only a probability that it is there. This was against Einstein’s intuition, but Bohr and others eventually proved it was correct. While Einstein was right about a great many things, he was wrong about QM. I like to think however, that were he alive today, he would be quietly pleased that someone proved him wrong.
@@Georgexb thnku so much
@@laibaiqbal158 playing the dice means quantization, thing is only allowed somewhere or it can only have a specific value
Like, an electron is quantized, it can't just go anywhere (like in the nucleus and that we have nodal planes)
At the same the electon cloud that we have is also a probability density
We know the places where electron can never be and places where can just give probability just like the probability of playing a dice
@@istudy2194 thnku....
Now this is what I call evolution. From these big brain headed scientists to us playing games or watching TH-cam 24/7
Devolution you mean?
You are talking like everyone, at that time was like this . Every era has his set of intellectuals who are busy working for the progress of humanity.
Even without having any idea of physics you can tell that those actors also have no idea of physics.
Lol
Oof this is deep
tell me one wrong quantum mechanics info that they mentioned and is wrong !
@CluelessAmerican it is because i think that this is superb acting .
They definitely have some knowledge about physics to perform in these roles
I just realized, I'm basically a caveman.
You're not alone
😂😂😅
Me too but luckily I can use a smartphone atleast
Or are you? *Vsauce music plays in background
Where are your fingers?
Every scientist made a significant contribution to the scientific world even if all the points ain't right still we should look at the things that were unimaginable to our common minds and provided a path though to led the afterward discoveries...Respect for all☺
I'm still uncertain for the uncertainty principle.
Om Patil but i can say with quite certainity that the uncertainty is not uncertain!😁😁
0:40 The problem is the universe does not conform to human logic, all we can do is make the best observations we can and deduce conclusions from them
1:05 "Science isn't there to be USEFUL, it's there to help us UNDERSTAND the world." Indeed.
That's the beauty of Quantum Mechanics. It doesn't seem logical, but it's the most logical explanation to everything in the universe
Undersampling causes quantization. Proper sampling problems converts that into Continuum.
@@donaldkasper8346 that sampling is different from qunatam sampling I guess.
@@donaldkasper8346 You are confusing aliasing with quantisation 💀
@@b11-x3o Take the second dominant trough in infrared mineral spectral, correlate it to refractive index at 8cm spacing. What do you get? A match sometimes. Go to 2cm spacing, what do you get? An exact match. So pattern identification can be dependent on resolution of the measurement. What is the standard in mineralogical infrared research? 8cm. Oh, so 75 years and they see nothing. Okay. This is your science. Undersampling resolution can lead to sporadic identification and false quanta expectations.
@@curious_banda Your are confusing cause with effect and equivalencing them. Aliasing is from undersampling, and that undersampling is probably the cause of quantization phenomena. You also fail to understand that quanta are not a natural state and neither are so-called physical constants. How are they achieved? For you, the cause is magic. For me, it takes a force that is energy to enforce quantization and constants in systems. It takes a regulator. If you cannot find the enforcer/regulator of the quanta system and constants, then you don't have a grasp of the system or there is no quanta or constant. 1800s physical constants are not natural things, they are placeholders to equivalence equations and define behaviors with improper and incomplete equations.
" the goal of scientific pursuit should not be merely to make use of things around us but to understand it, fundamentally" ...it's just made my day :)))
Imagine almost being hit by a car and some weird thought struck you.
At least one famous physicist has walked into a pole and had a light bulb moment (can't bring his name to mind offhand).
Or getting hit by an apple on the head
It not a weird thought. He (nearly) walked into the perfect analogy with the subject at hand. Serendipity.
I love this line
The thing which you can't see, you can't apply any rules!
He is a lover of classical physics more than quantum
This show false tho. Einstein was one of the founders of quantum mechanics, he won his nobel prize for his paper on the photoelectric effect in 1905 and he discovered brownian motion. Everything that is said in this scene is completely false, it's funny to see how everyone in the comment section is using this to dissect one of the most brilliant scientist we have had. Lol. Maybe people here should go to google scholar, type in einstein and read some of his papers. That is, if you can.
@@appsenence9244 hahaha, my bad luck that u replied to my comment
Here after watching Oppenhiemer, loved this mini series about Einstien! They could have done something similar with Oppenhiemer as well..
Time Travel Rules
1. Only observe don't change history.
2. Wear chothes from that time period.
3. Only spend 2 mins in the past to prevent any mistakes that would change history.
4. If history is changed by mistake go back and change it back.
5. Find a hide out so the time machine doesn't fall into the wrong hand's.
Nah, I don't think the universe would allow you to change history so much that you cease to exist.
Another thing to add to your list would be.
If you do anything, remeber the butterfly effect.
@@legendaryzet8450 the butterfly effect may be greatly over-exaggerated
@@BrushEm i don't think so
@@legendaryzet8450 also possibility of doppelganger
@@legendaryzet8450 what's butterfly effect
We are but eddies in the whirlpool. Blink, and we disappear. Nothing is more fleeting than appearances, and yet we hold onto them.
Elaborate, you deep, struggling poet!
Thank you 🙏 National Geographics.
You know I watch you ALOT & appreciate your support.
Mom : go to school
Me : I'm not seeing it , so it doesn't exist....
Flying sliders on my face**
Well actually this is real. This isn't a joke. It's not about the quantum world. If you aren't conscious of a thing, it isn't existing relative to you. As everything is relative, other people who are conscious of your school must have the school relative to them as existing, but not your relative school will exist.
😂
When I teach the uncertainty principle to my high school students I use the analogy of a pool table in the dark. You can hear a collision and can guess where the ball was... but where it ends up is a mystery. You can estimate the speed of the collision based on the volume of the clank...Its not perfect but it helps.
Seriously and truly speaking,
I learn more from NATGEO and TED-ED than I learn from my school
Seriously, School system f*cks.
😔😔
School is not a real school as it should be.
Try learning from your own brain
But school is necesessary for a Job, even though you can't learn anything from it.
They dont tell you to imagen or think, they tell you to copy and memorize. And I have fully accepted my fate as a printer
I am thinking indian education system worse are you indian
I love this, im reading a book about this just now!! It's so incredible that this book is from 1989 and the topic from the book is mentioned here! So cool!!
Thorcody which book?
Genius by Walter Isaacson maybe
The more u understand the quantum mechanics, the more u don’t, as if described by the uncertainty principle itself !!!
its not einsteins fault that he almost got hit by the car, it was simply going so fast that it would have been impossible for him to accurately determain its position
Idk why their accents make this so much better
The flaw in Einstein's logic is the fact that he expected the universe to obey his idea of common sense. As the person who developed relativity I'd hoped he would be more open minded. In my mind the idea that subatomic particles disobey what we see in normal life makes even more sense than the idea that time disobeys what we see in normal life at high speeds/other circumstances.
Ok, and how does the disobey makes more sense? I am really curious
@CluelessAmerican he was not really skeptic, he refused to believed it even though there were many scientific researchs about quantum physics, about life being probabilistic (theoretically), because it makes absolutely no sense if you think of it normally. But in the end, his objections turn out to be a huge evidence for the importance of quantum physics.
Einstein was also one of the people to develop quantum mechanics (His paper on the photoelectric effect). His problem with quantum mechanics was entirely due to his belief in things like energy conservation, momentum conservation, among others. A weaker mind would abandon these concepts when it comes to quantum mechanics, whereas Einstein tried to reconsile the two… Hence his objections.
True. @@De2Venner
@@duykhanh7746 [bell] labs bic banagrams
When ever I go though a National Geography programme I add to knowledge.
"well, then, if you don't start using your brain to observe what's right in front of you, you're going to get yourself killed", everyone says that to me cause I am always lost in my thoughts half the time thinking about random things that do not make sense
This sounds like dialogue written by a non-scientist.
exactly. “Einstein” says stupid assuption and “Heisenberg” invents a stupid explanation.
01:09 Understanding that which cannot be understood. Calculated, yes. Measured, yes. Observed, yes. Understood, never.
Heisenberg thought about it and now we have to study about it.
tesla is also a genius! feature his story please natgeo:)
True scientists know that tesla wasn't a true genius. He was a crackpot who refuted general relativity on the grounds that 'The math was complicated'. He was an engineer to begin with.
Picasso is next
Good God! I cannot accept that. Picasso - really? Not at all a worthwhile selection. I have nothing against Picasso, but when season one is Einstein, season two cannot be Pablo; the bar is just too high. Feynman! Now there would be a good series! Such an enjoyable one, too; a true genius with such a story, so many pranks and asides and so much good humor.
You think that Picasso is superior to tesla?
Christopher Donaghue It looks like Nat Geo wants to make series with all fields, not just science. It's a good idea for reaching a greater audience.
"the goal of scientific pursuit should not be merely to make use of the world around us, it should be to understand it, fundamentally."
I absolutely agree
0:55 this moment tells alot
0:49 Me after my calculus professor says something
I love this SO much. It's so fun to see those cars whizzing thru them. Oh, the quantum potential of it all. Oh, the mystery.
Einstein VS Niels Bohr, ERB should created this one !
Hikari Shop bottle would roast that einstein
That would be amazing!
"Particle doesn't exist unless we see it"
Can u explain plz???
@@ramupoudel2002 ask bohr
@@zfg07 he doesn't know actually . It is only hypothesis
Heisenberg be having us shutting our eyes walking through traffic
I want someone to have this conversations on daily basis
Where I can find complete season of Genius- Einstein
The biggest challenge is combining the theory of relativity with quantum-mechanics. Seeing as quantum-mechanics is one of the most accurate theories ever created in explaining reality, however is unable to explain gravity.
Scientists like Einstein and Planck never fully accepted it, their view was that the theory could be valid, but only in a deterministic equation, or that it only explained a certain part of the theory of everything. And there are deterministic views of quantum theory like the multi-verse one.
That era was fabulous... Believe me!!!
Okay so if we don’t see particles , they won’t exist : my question is how are the collisions between particles happening around us and creating atmospheric pressure if we don’t see it ?. Collisions are happening that means they exist , chemical reactions are happening that means particles exist if we see it or not , chemical reactions were happening when humans didn’t exist , when Big Bang happened many things happened and we were nit there to witness it , how does particles don’t exist then ? Unless there is something else involved other than particles if this theory is proved. 1:39
it's not true that they don't exist. they do not have "local realism" so they don't have a specific value for spin etc. as they travel. but they exist, in the theory they exist
The Uncertainty Principle could be the biggest clue that we are living in simulated universe. Particles don't exist till you see them.
OMG! These two legends. I want to be a part of these sorts of conversations.🤩
Me too my friend.
Two geniuses 🙏🙏❤️❤️😭😭
Einstein forgot that there is a conscious observer behind the Steering wheel attached to 4wheels. 😍
So it's......relative?
@@philasogwa8875 This universe is Relative to the observer that's why Theory of Relativity works..
@@philasogwa8875 An obsever is must for the universe to exist for example the universe in your dream doesn't exist without you, Universe doesn't exist without God & conscious observers.
@@philasogwa8875 Possibly after your death car will drive over you & you are a ghost 👻 nothing happens to you at all.. That's the base reality called God, Consciousness & Universe itself..
@@eternalsoul3439 and the proof is?
Well, it was a brand NEW concept. And waaaaay out of the box. Einstei has a few GOOD arguments - within the realm of Classical Mechanics. The quantum people really did not know how to answer some of them. Nowadays, it is better understood. There are better answers to those questions. Those questions actually make sense and are intelligent questions.
0.37 the golden moment for the observable universe.
Me after studying physics for an hour:
I am dumbstruck and speechless after each episode ends. unmoved with impact of presentation. this series is an institution by it self and benchmark for all the departments of involved in movie making. acting and micro level expression is so classic that i see all repeated episode in week.
This is Master piece teamwork
And if this really happened that is Neils Bhor saving Einstein from an accident we must be thankful to him.
Einstein has done already his contribution 10 years before.
😂😂😂🤣
I love that they actually got a danish actor to play Niels Bohr
Quantum mechanics doesn’t state that the particle “doesn’t exist” until it is measured. It states that whatever property you’re measuring (eg. position) is in a superposition of states until the moment you measure it, when it undergoes a “wave function collapse”. It’s a mathematical way to represent a physical process that is fundamentally indeterministic.
That’s what Einstein disliked - and so does pretty much everyone - the idea that nature is indeterministic at a micro scale, but perfectly deterministic at a macro scale.
Conversely, there are examples where chaotic systems can be made “less” chaotic when introducing the indeterminism of quantum mechanics - for example the “kicked rotor”. The distributed nature of subatomic wave functions may actually help “calm” chaotic systems as we zoom out to a macro scale.
yup and thank you for giving the correct version
Absolutely well done and definitely keep it up!!! 👍👍👍👍👍
How wondrously he explained Niels Bohrs with about to sacrifice his own life 😁
I wish I had physics taught to me like this!
"The goal of scientific pursuit should not be merely to make use of the world around us." -- That pretty much sums up why they say that physicists hate engineers.
I am always inspired by Albert enstein
Einstein guided Bhor in an excellent way 😊
Einstein had hard time hanging up with these ideas of Heisenberg and neils bohr
Quantam entanglement and quantum theory was like a joke to him
He even didn't approve the theory
but now we know now that Einstein was wrong in his thoughts about quantum theory and Heisenberg was right
Well he used Planck's quantum model to explain the photoelectric effect
Unfortunately there was no book for Einstein to read. Quantum mechanics was at its basics in1927 it only came into full after Schrodinger explained his theory on how electrons would not follow the rules of the physical macroscopic world. Imagine yourself his entering into the realm of quantum mechanics (u can't do thought experiments or follow the rules of physics which govern physical world since the dawn of newton). It's quite and eccentric theory that quantum mechanics
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle led us to view the quantum world as one that favors probability over certainty. This also led to a "battle of titans": For Bohr, we lack the language to understand the quantum world, but for Einstein, God does not play dice with the universe.
As a matter of fact, Neils's coming right to me saying "automobiles ain't subatomic particles"
I were used to get what the Einstein says , though i havent learned that neiter ar school nor myself i just knew it before. But the Heisenbergs uncertainty makes me think a lot.
Heisenberg may have slept here.
Just think. They both are still arguing these issues somewhere. We just have no access to them.
Like Bishop George Berkeley said way back around 1750, ''esse est percipi", or ''to be is to be perceived''.
Just imagining going back in past and giving lectures in all fields of physics and Your words will be written by those legendary scientists on their diary🤣🤣🤣
Yes, but it would be an alternate reality and not this spacetime frame.
"Heisenberg uncertainty principle disproved with certainty"...