Women did not want to vote because they believed that Rights come with attendant responsibilities. When they get drafted into war they should be allowed to decide what government we have but not before then.
YES. people think they have a right to do this and do that but they dont want the responcibility that comes with it. rights comes with responcibility. it's not an entitlement.
Maybe you can time travel and be a woman at that time with no rights ( your value only being a baby maker) and see how you like it? In my understanding of history male leaders historically create more wars than women leaders. Women uphold peace treaties more than our male counterparts, women leaders are often called into distressed companies to help them be more profitable, women leaders in Canada and Finland during covid were praised for their collaborative efforts. We know by now countries and organizations do better when there is reflective leadership. We need good men and women in leadership and voting.
Women trapped like a gilded cage they are, until decades later when women break free from this structure strict ways from her family and parents (grandparents)
Women always talk about having the rights of men, but not the responsibilities. Not long after Seneca Falls came the Civil War. Incredible 800,000 young men were killed in that war. Hundreds of thousands more were wounded and suffered loss of limbs. Did women demand a right to fight and die in the war? Fast forward to the last war in which men were compelled to fight in: Vietnam. Over 58,000 men died in that war, versus six women. Men went to great extremes to avoid that jungle. They escaped to Canada, or intentionally gave themselves a gunshot wound. By the end of our participation, Vietnam had descended into madness, with young American soldiers intentionally killing poor women and children in villages. By murdering their own officers. What "rights" would women have given up avoiding being sent to the jungles of Vietnam?
Equal doesn’t mean the same. Men born at birth can’t have babies. Most good women are natural born visionaries and collaborators causing us to influence less war and more peace although we often forget to credit ourselves for these things. In my experience women don’t want to dominate men we make up 51% of the population and in the US over half of the workforce. However unconscious bias and ignorance around different styles of leadership still cause us to address the broken rung and the glass ceiling with grace. Women do better and make more money when we have an inner circle of allies who also believe in our value.
@@BlurrySyrup-ts4oz You have just re-stated Joseph Heller’s classic “Catch 22.” Any woman who wishes that she had been among the Marines who experienced the most primitive instincts of kill or be killed on the hellish atoll of Iwo Jima would be totally bereft of her senses, and being thus, the Marines would never have accepted her. 😎 We heard so much about the staunch resolution of a united Ukraine to repel the Russian invaders, only years later to learn from the BBC that over 650,000 men had illegally fled the country to avoid combat. No, women are not mad, and only the mad would want to lift themselves out of their trenches to charge entrenched machine guns while artillery shells exploded all around them.
Very sad how these two very well-meaning and important causes were pitted against one another.
This is interesting history!
Homework gang wya
Facts
5:50 Holy racism, batman!
6:03 It got worse!
I wonder how it would have turned out if those "uneducated men" made laws instead
Such a good series. Race vs. Sex - Which comes first?
Thank you 🇺🇸
0:17 why she built like a rectangle
lol
My gg great grandparents were in seneca falls during this time.
hw gang
It's important to know these things to at least sound like a smart/sympathetic man. 🧐
You mean a simp.
this really did feel like what would become white feminism
Women did not want to vote because they believed that Rights come with attendant responsibilities. When they get drafted into war they should be allowed to decide what government we have but not before then.
YES. people think they have a right to do this and do that but they dont want the responcibility that comes with it. rights comes with responcibility. it's not an entitlement.
Maybe you can time travel and be a woman at that time with no rights ( your value only being a baby maker) and see how you like it? In my understanding of history male leaders historically create more wars than women leaders. Women uphold peace treaties more than our male counterparts, women leaders are often called into distressed companies to help them be more profitable, women leaders in Canada and Finland during covid were praised for their collaborative efforts. We know by now countries and organizations do better when there is reflective leadership. We need good men and women in leadership and voting.
Great
it truly was
Women trapped like a gilded cage they are, until decades later when women break free from this structure strict ways from her family and parents (grandparents)
"Women trapped like a gilded cage they are"
What does that even mean? Is English your first language? lol
@@SpicyTexan64yes
Women broke free yet they're the most unhappy and complain about everything
God damn why is this video so creepy
GOhSts
@@Luna_Shadows BaD SpElLiNg ToO.
No
Yes
@@uspilot6969 no
Women did not have to get married. Why did they if it was so terrible?
The answer is economics.
A lot Women of a certain age that were unmarried, were put into “asylums”
they didnt have a choice. they were often forced to
Women always talk about having the rights of men, but not the responsibilities. Not long after Seneca Falls came the Civil War. Incredible 800,000 young men were killed in that war. Hundreds of thousands more were wounded and suffered loss of limbs. Did women demand a right to fight and die in the war? Fast forward to the last war in which men were compelled to fight in: Vietnam. Over 58,000 men died in that war, versus six women. Men went to great extremes to avoid that jungle. They escaped to Canada, or intentionally gave themselves a gunshot wound. By the end of our participation, Vietnam had descended into madness, with young American soldiers intentionally killing poor women and children in villages. By murdering their own officers. What "rights" would women have given up avoiding being sent to the jungles of Vietnam?
LOL women were working in the factories keeping the American economy alive during the war! goodbye
Equal doesn’t mean the same. Men born at birth can’t have babies. Most good women are natural born visionaries and collaborators causing us to influence less war and more peace although we often forget to credit ourselves for these things. In my experience women don’t want to dominate men we make up 51% of the population and in the US over half of the workforce. However unconscious bias and ignorance around different styles of leadership still cause us to address the broken rung and the glass ceiling with grace. Women do better and make more money when we have an inner circle of allies who also believe in our value.
women HAVE been trying to fight in wars its you guys who have been stopping them 😭
@@BlurrySyrup-ts4oz You have just re-stated Joseph Heller’s classic “Catch 22.” Any woman who wishes that she had been among the Marines who experienced the most primitive instincts of kill or be killed on the hellish atoll of Iwo Jima would be totally bereft of her senses, and being thus, the Marines would never have accepted her. 😎
We heard so much about the staunch resolution of a united Ukraine to repel the Russian invaders, only years later to learn from the BBC that over 650,000 men had illegally fled the country to avoid combat.
No, women are not mad, and only the mad would want to lift themselves out of their trenches to charge entrenched machine guns while artillery shells exploded all around them.