Damanjit Singh, Because those so called Khalistani are afraid of Pakistan and China, they are brave only outside India. If my guess is right there are only 5% or even less who wants khalistan. morons
@@x3sukh India can't suppress Sikhs as India is a country. Harmandir sahib has been destroyed many time by Mughals also , if you are talking of 1984 then Bhindrawals should have not been in Harmandir sahib. Period. It was the Congress party who were ruling in 1984 which is pro Muslim party. Punjab will always be the part of India .
Jis jis Hindu Na Apni ma ka dud 🥛🍼 Pia hai Jo Jo Hindu apna app ko 1 Bap ki Olad Manta hai Vo Canada Usa Australia New land Uk Jasa counter ma na jahya
I despise the idea of Khalistan, or to be honest I don't understand it. I know for sure if this issue is ongoing for this many years there must be a good justification to it. But, the point is that instead of putting up a debate and letting me or the public in general what Khalistan is, they end up burning India's flag and going against the general population. This belligerence and debauchery is intolerable. I cannot find a single sane discussion where I am educated about Khalistan
bc according to his logic Marathas should overtake whole of India coz before British they almost defeated the remaining Mughals also, Mughals should take back the India coz they ruled it for over 200 years? kuch bhi? INA ke aage aao pele jao ge!
Genichiro I was thinking on the same lines , which is right, and how far back do we want to go to claim the land of punjab? These so call themselves sikhs/khalistanis are enemies of Punjab and India . They can F..king fight for land in Canada ,USA and Australia for khalistan I say.
Khalistan is NOT Khalsa Raj. Khalsa Raj is gurbani, while Khalistan is a made up term. Khalsa Raj means rule of the pure, and it's a prophecy by Guru Gobind Singh, and it's coming.
Kisi ne sachi kha hai, Desh ko todne vale bahr se nahi the , vo to desh le hi the. This educated fool is one such example asking to topple the government and divide India. 😔
Why you don't talk about Punjab in Pakistan. Do that and you would understand just and unjust. Harinder Singh as per your The Ranveer Show interview you looked like decent mam but now after listening to you it's more like diplomatic answer
Pata nhi tuhanu baahr baithn waleya nu kyun punjab di stability changi nhi lgdi... 1800-1840 tak khalsa raaj nhi...infact sikh raaj v nhi....oh maharaja ranjit singh raaj c.....he was a great leader ...main ohna di poori izzt krda....but it was one man rule.....ohna di death to immediately baad collapse shuru ho gya te 8 saal de vich vich e raaj khtm ho gya....osda kasoor hun tusi koi chaar paanj name pinpoint krke kdd do...te koi logic nhi bnega....kyunki koi v raaj nu sustain hon lai ek institutionalisation chahidi hundi...jehri unluckily ranjit singh ji nhi kr paaye....ohna to baad de raaje aapas ch e ldh ldh khtm ho gye...kyunki koi perspective ya system nhi haga c sikh raj nu institutionalise krn lai.....thats y i call it ranjit singh raaj. Main aap sikh haan te sikhi nu poore drje te rkhda haan.... Par mainu nhi lgda khalistan kisi cheez da hal hai..... Punjab to baahr wsde sikhs and gurudwareya nu ujaadhn da blueprint hai khalistan. Asi pehlaan muslmanaan naal ldhde rhe ..hun sanu pakistan chnga lgn lg prya te hindu galat.... Injustice ess duniya de vich sb to vdda dushman te cruelty hai ....te oh har desh ch vssdi hai.... Osda hall koi vkhra desh bnana nhi hai... Khalistan bnn to baad asi caste basis te ladhaange....jatt te nihang supremacy uppr ladhange.... sehajdhaari te amritdhaari upr ladhange.... Khalistan naa bnaao....par khalis zrur bnaao....apne aap nu...apni society nu ..... Ek eho ji perfect society te religious unity bnaao....ki india de baaki log sikhi wl attract hon....te asin apni khalis sikhi nu patiala shambu border to agge le jaaiye.....te esnu hor vadaaiye ..... Na ki rehnda khunde punjab nu india chon vkh krke te pakistan to loan mangde firiye.... Thoda socho....canada baithe lok v ethon de e gye hoye ne...ohna naal history ch injustice hoya osda koi shk nhi.....bahut madhaa hoya 1984 te oston baad de saalan ch.....par injustice es duniya de ek kroor sch hai....te eh baahrle deshan ch v hai.....har desh da development level vkhra hai.....te ohdi di society di development v ohde te hi depend krdi hai. North America ch mass shootings racial abuse hunda...europe ne sari duniya nu luttke aaj syana bnn da theka lita hoya.... Apna next version khalistan nhi.....khalis punjab hona chahida hai.
You are very right sir .. I'm hindu from Punjab or sikh community is really going down due to this khalistanis agendas of those who are sitting outside India.. No khalistani leader talk about increase of Christianity in Punjab... punjab khalistan nhi jesusthan bn jana kush saalan ch ..SGPC have that much funding and sikh people donate that much people so that they can open school to educate poor sikh family and provide them economical support less or more when they need ...kyuki gareeb te dalit sikh hi jyada convert ho rhe ne
What a stupid logic by this guy pretending to be some researcher, by his logic Biharis should be given all of the Indian subcontinent since they established the Mauryan empire and drove the Greeks out of India. Why not give all of India to Marathas, who established a pan India empire which also included Punjab? All of India Punjab was under Prithviraj Chauhan so may be rajputs should get it back too!
You absolutely have no common sense based on your comment. Those empires that you talked about were all established via conquest and not by any integrative process. Hence, rajputs and etc cannot under the international law practice UN charters for self determinations. Sikhs had an self indigenous rule on Punjab. Sikhs can. there is a huge huge difference if you think about it.
@@simranjitsingh4804 What a nonsensical comment. Sikh kingdom was not some country, it was simply a kingdom and majority of the population of the kingdom followed Islam. Sikhs were less than 10% of the overall population. Sikh kingdom was also established via conquest. Multan was conquered from Afghans. This was not the era of modern day nation states and when there used to be a constitution. At the end of the day, Maharaja Ranjit Singh was a king just like Shivaji or Prithviraj Chahan or Maharaja Surajmal and kings are dictators who have an army and they will get rid of you, if you challenge them. Once Sikhs cut off the Afghans from Punjab, they ruled over Punjab. Local Punjabi Muslims never ever ruled Punjab anyways. They always were vassals of Afghans. Kashmir was also conquered. It was not some integrative process. By your logic, Marathas had their self rule in Maharashtra. Rajputs had their own self rule in Rajasthan, therefore they should all get their kingdoms back and are entitled to self determination.
@@simranjitsingh4804 Sikhs are not entitled to any self determination because Sikhs themselves were not a majority in the kingdom they ruled over and it lasted just 50 years before it collapsed. When some group claims self determination, they should be a majority in that land with a unique language and history, and their country should not come about through genocide, ethnic cleansing and population exchange which is what you guys need to establish Khalistan. And Punjabi Hindus who are exactly the same ethnic group as Sikhs, do not identify with any of your causes. Sikhs are simply a religious group just like Jains and Hindus. The Sikh majority in Indian Punjab came about due to mass migration during partition. And there are more Punjabi Hindus than Sikhs in pure numbers and most of them are spread all across India and if most of them were to return to Indian Punjab, Sikhs would simply be a minority in the state of Indian Punjab. So what makes you think Punjab belongs more to you than to them and they have been in Punjab for 4000+ years?
@@siddave549 Sikhs empire lasted 50 years. Since 1990, more than 32 new countries have been created. These countries have been existence for less than 40 years but at the end of the day they are independent countries. Same with sikhs empire so your logic is flawed. I am not going to comment on the rest of ur comment bc its makes no sense. Have a great day.
@@simranjitsingh4804 LOL we will come here 50 years from now and see if Khalistan exists or not. Chill out! your argument is nonsense and people will laugh at it whenever you try to make a case…coz of how nonsensical it is.. may be also ask yourself how those countries are doing and how many of them are landlocked…?
There were many HINDU Kingdoms in India before the so-called Sikh Raj, so by the same logic all of them should also be re-established. Then there will be no space for the so-called Maharaja Ranjit Singh Khalsa Raj! Good riddance.
![ILLSLICK - THE KING'S LANDING [Freestyle]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/feIJJnNkTfk/mqdefault.jpg)
Why does nobody ask for Khalistan from Pak and China as it was the part of Sikh kingdom.
Because barely any Sikhs live there anymore. It makes no sense.
@@13thera21 Where are all the Sikhs gone from there? What does not make sense?
Damanjit Singh, Because those so called Khalistani are afraid of Pakistan and China, they are brave only outside India. If my guess is right there are only 5% or even less who wants khalistan. morons
@@ssimba2785 because India has always suppressed Sikhs.
India destroyed harmandir sahib and killed lakhs of sikhs in 90s.
@@x3sukh India can't suppress Sikhs as India is a country. Harmandir sahib has been destroyed many time by Mughals also , if you are talking of 1984 then Bhindrawals should have not been in Harmandir sahib. Period. It was the Congress party who were ruling in 1984 which is pro Muslim party. Punjab will always be the part of India .
Real punjabi people against Khalistan people servent in USA Australia newzealand Canada uk chrstin country
Jis jis
Hindu
Na
Apni ma ka dud 🥛🍼
Pia hai
Jo Jo Hindu apna app ko
1 Bap ki
Olad
Manta hai
Vo
Canada
Usa
Australia
New land
Uk
Jasa counter ma na jahya
I despise the idea of Khalistan, or to be honest I don't understand it. I know for sure if this issue is ongoing for this many years there must be a good justification to it. But, the point is that instead of putting up a debate and letting me or the public in general what Khalistan is, they end up burning India's flag and going against the general population. This belligerence and debauchery is intolerable.
I cannot find a single sane discussion where I am educated about Khalistan
bc according to his logic Marathas should overtake whole of India coz before British they almost defeated the remaining Mughals also, Mughals should take back the India coz they ruled it for over 200 years? kuch bhi? INA ke aage aao pele jao ge!
Genichiro I was thinking on the same lines , which is right, and how far back do we want to go to claim the land of punjab? These so call themselves sikhs/khalistanis are enemies of Punjab and India . They can F..king fight for land in Canada ,USA and Australia for khalistan I say.
Raj karega khalsa baki rahe na koi
Ashina khalistan to ham bna ke rahen ge or tu ukhad le jo ukhaad sakta hai
@@teajbhaghel ha dimag me bna sakte ho jitna marzi! Last time I checked 2020 tak ban jana chahiye tha right?
@@teajbhaghel fucking good joke🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Just tell me one thing if you take khalistan, will you leave Parna Sauib, Bangla Sahib, Hazoor Sahib, Hemkhund sahib etc????
I love my Sikh friends ,As a person with cerebral palsy have met wonderful medical professionals from the Sikh community.
it is easy to divide it is hard to unite
Come and get punjab if you can bring your abbu pakistan with you too taksal badals 😂😂😂😂 etc are just
Khalistan is NOT Khalsa Raj. Khalsa Raj is gurbani, while Khalistan is a made up term. Khalsa Raj means rule of the pure, and it's a prophecy by Guru Gobind Singh, and it's coming.
ਸਹੀ ਕਿਹਾ ਬਾਈ ਤੁਸੀਂ
Agree both are different terms and meanings too.
Spoken like a true coward and yes man to the hindutva establishment.
Right or wrong, does India even agree with Khalsa Raj? 🤷🏻♂️
Kisi ne sachi kha hai, Desh ko todne vale bahr se nahi the , vo to desh le hi the.
This educated fool is one such example asking to topple the government and divide India. 😔
If you want khalistan will you be ready to live patna saheb... Tell me
Hazoor sahib , manikaran sahib too
Why you don't talk about Punjab in Pakistan. Do that and you would understand just and unjust. Harinder Singh as per your The Ranveer Show interview you looked like decent mam but now after listening to you it's more like diplomatic answer
India got them killed
Pata nhi tuhanu baahr baithn waleya nu kyun punjab di stability changi nhi lgdi...
1800-1840 tak khalsa raaj nhi...infact sikh raaj v nhi....oh maharaja ranjit singh raaj c.....he was a great leader ...main ohna di poori izzt krda....but it was one man rule.....ohna di death to immediately baad collapse shuru ho gya te 8 saal de vich vich e raaj khtm ho gya....osda kasoor hun tusi koi chaar paanj name pinpoint krke kdd do...te koi logic nhi bnega....kyunki koi v raaj nu sustain hon lai ek institutionalisation chahidi hundi...jehri unluckily ranjit singh ji nhi kr paaye....ohna to baad de raaje aapas ch e ldh ldh khtm ho gye...kyunki koi perspective ya system nhi haga c sikh raj nu institutionalise krn lai.....thats y i call it ranjit singh raaj.
Main aap sikh haan te sikhi nu poore drje te rkhda haan....
Par mainu nhi lgda khalistan kisi cheez da hal hai.....
Punjab to baahr wsde sikhs and gurudwareya nu ujaadhn da blueprint hai khalistan.
Asi pehlaan muslmanaan naal ldhde rhe ..hun sanu pakistan chnga lgn lg prya te hindu galat....
Injustice ess duniya de vich sb to vdda dushman te cruelty hai ....te oh har desh ch vssdi hai....
Osda hall koi vkhra desh bnana nhi hai...
Khalistan bnn to baad asi caste basis te ladhaange....jatt te nihang supremacy uppr ladhange.... sehajdhaari te amritdhaari upr ladhange....
Khalistan naa bnaao....par khalis zrur bnaao....apne aap nu...apni society nu ..... Ek eho ji perfect society te religious unity bnaao....ki india de baaki log sikhi wl attract hon....te asin apni khalis sikhi nu patiala shambu border to agge le jaaiye.....te esnu hor vadaaiye .....
Na ki rehnda khunde punjab nu india chon vkh krke te pakistan to loan mangde firiye....
Thoda socho....canada baithe lok v ethon de e gye hoye ne...ohna naal history ch injustice hoya osda koi shk nhi.....bahut madhaa hoya 1984 te oston baad de saalan ch.....par injustice es duniya de ek kroor sch hai....te eh baahrle deshan ch v hai.....har desh da development level vkhra hai.....te ohdi di society di development v ohde te hi depend krdi hai.
North America ch mass shootings racial abuse hunda...europe ne sari duniya nu luttke aaj syana bnn da theka lita hoya....
Apna next version khalistan nhi.....khalis punjab hona chahida hai.
You are very right sir .. I'm hindu from Punjab or sikh community is really going down due to this khalistanis agendas of those who are sitting outside India..
No khalistani leader talk about increase of Christianity in Punjab... punjab khalistan nhi jesusthan bn jana kush saalan ch ..SGPC have that much funding and sikh people donate that much people so that they can open school to educate poor sikh family and provide them economical support less or more when they need ...kyuki gareeb te dalit sikh hi jyada convert ho rhe ne
His sikh "aspiration" is more like marxist "revolution". I have doubts this view is heavily coloured by marxist historiography.
Pehla Punjabi bolo fir khalistan. Bano
Waah lakh d lahnat tere te
Te tenu like krn valea te
Je kithe likhya punjabi bolan vala hi khalistani baan sakda
@@badassgamer885 word good job
Jidn khalistan bngeya udn hi Pakistan Sade par kabza kr Lena.....Una kol nuclear weapon a
ALSO NO OCEAN Access,WE WON'T BE ABLE TO DO TRADE.....
Hahahahahaha nice joke
ਆਜ਼ਾਦੀ ਹੀ ਹੱਲ ਹੈ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਲਈ
If you want khalistan will you be ready to live patna saheb... Tell me
What a stupid logic by this guy pretending to be some researcher, by his logic Biharis should be given all of the Indian subcontinent since they established the Mauryan empire and drove the Greeks out of India.
Why not give all of India to Marathas, who established a pan India empire which also included Punjab?
All of India Punjab was under Prithviraj Chauhan so may be rajputs should get it back too!
You absolutely have no common sense based on your comment. Those empires that you talked about were all established via conquest and not by any integrative process. Hence, rajputs and etc cannot under the international law practice UN charters for self determinations. Sikhs had an self indigenous rule on Punjab. Sikhs can. there is a huge huge difference if you think about it.
@@simranjitsingh4804 What a nonsensical comment. Sikh kingdom was not some country, it was simply a kingdom and majority of the population of the kingdom followed Islam. Sikhs were less than 10% of the overall population. Sikh kingdom was also established via conquest. Multan was conquered from Afghans.
This was not the era of modern day nation states and when there used to be a constitution. At the end of the day, Maharaja Ranjit Singh was a king just like Shivaji or Prithviraj Chahan or Maharaja Surajmal and kings are dictators who have an army and they will get rid of you, if you challenge them.
Once Sikhs cut off the Afghans from Punjab, they ruled over Punjab. Local Punjabi Muslims never ever ruled Punjab anyways. They always were vassals of Afghans. Kashmir was also conquered. It was not some integrative process.
By your logic, Marathas had their self rule in Maharashtra. Rajputs had their own self rule in Rajasthan, therefore they should all get their kingdoms back and are entitled to self determination.
@@simranjitsingh4804 Sikhs are not entitled to any self determination because Sikhs themselves were not a majority in the kingdom they ruled over and it lasted just 50 years before it collapsed.
When some group claims self determination, they should be a majority in that land with a unique language and history, and their country should not come about through genocide, ethnic cleansing and population exchange which is what you guys need to establish Khalistan. And Punjabi Hindus who are exactly the same ethnic group as Sikhs, do not identify with any of your causes. Sikhs are simply a religious group just like Jains and Hindus.
The Sikh majority in Indian Punjab came about due to mass migration during partition. And there are more Punjabi Hindus than Sikhs in pure numbers and most of them are spread all across India and if most of them were to return to Indian Punjab, Sikhs would simply be a minority in the state of Indian Punjab. So what makes you think Punjab belongs more to you than to them and they have been in Punjab for 4000+ years?
@@siddave549 Sikhs empire lasted 50 years. Since 1990, more than 32 new countries have been created. These countries have been existence for less than 40 years but at the end of the day they are independent countries. Same with sikhs empire so your logic is flawed. I am not going to comment on the rest of ur comment bc its makes no sense. Have a great day.
@@simranjitsingh4804 LOL we will come here 50 years from now and see if Khalistan exists or not. Chill out! your argument is nonsense and people will laugh at it whenever you try to make a case…coz of how nonsensical it is..
may be also ask yourself how those countries are doing and how many of them are landlocked…?
Khalistan laurabad
Baneerji the urchin..watch your words
ASK BADAL AND GROUP OF 5000 BE WITH NANAK WAY AND MAFFI FROM NANAK AND NOW BE GOOD GURU WALE GURMUKH NOT MANMUKH AND EARN SOME RESPECT AND BE WITH YOU
There were many HINDU Kingdoms in India before the so-called Sikh Raj, so by the same logic all of them should also be re-established. Then there will be no space for the so-called Maharaja Ranjit Singh Khalsa Raj! Good riddance.
Khalistan zindabad.
Banade pakistan main 😂😂😂
Khalistan Zindabad!
BADAL AND HIS 5000 FRIENDS DID THEY BECOME NANAK WAY DID U APPROCAH THEM
ਰਾਜ ਕਰੇਗਾ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਆਕੀ ਰਹੇ ਨਾ ਕੋਇ
Khalisthan zindabad
@_ Shyeoran 🙏🙏
Khalistan zindabad