This is why I subscribed to vox. Not to agree with me on everything. But to present a smart intelligent subject on a complicated issue where I agree with some aspects and disagree with others. Well done guys.
Pankhuri Tandon Trump will mop the floor with Bernie. All he has to do is bring up Universal Healthcare and he wins all the elderly vote. Then says Bernie wants to expand social security and abortion rights and he loses the young vote then he has no one.
My guy, don’t move here, America is garbage, it seems like your fluent in English, so I’d suggest moving to Canada or the UK, they have more stable governments lol
Raul Martinez I watched the entire video. What's the take away? People that have a conflict of interest are willing to say nice things about Clinton. Idc what her personality is. I disagreed strongly with her policies. Things like her capital gains tax policy targets the middle class. No thanks.
The take away is that casual observers in American politics often view her as cold and not trustworthy, while people who actually work in politics and have worked with her describe her as brilliant and effective. But her weakness was that she is a great listener and that made her look like she did not take on a dominant role while she was campaigning and it lead to her being affiliated with the wrong crowd such as Wall Street investors.
Raul Martinez Dude Clinton has a conflict of interest with the banks because of her privately taking millions of $ from them. I see this as a fact. Like the sky being blue. It's not a matter of opinion or open to interpretation. But still the reason I didn't vote, donate or volunteer for her is because I disagree with her policies.
Seems like a lot of folks resent an ambitious woman.. I think the other side is going to become overconfident.. There's still a ways to go and we've yet to have the debates.. Even though they're not perfect, the Democrats represent the good guys in the political process.. Win, lose or draw.. I'm riding with them.. 💪
True, but you can't win the presidency without them. She is usually good at forming relationships with anyone, except this group which is poor tactic when campaigning for presidency. This might be the point that Trump wins on. You can be a horrible person as long as you get more air time and never stop talking to the press. People will vote for whatever is on TV the most.
I tried to read her platform. It was long, detailed, and without any apparent unifying objective, theme, or principle. Now it all makes sense. That platform was written by everyone she ever had a conversation with together.
I think part of this is the obsession with personality and character, over policies, that American politics tends to have. I'm British, and, generally speaking, we care much less about the characters of our politicians beyond whether they seem capable. Or at least, I do. By that I mean I don't give a rats arse about the Prime Ministers family or pets or religious affiliation...etc...etc. I don't care if they are 'nice', 'confident' or 'love the country!', and even if I did, whether they can present those characteristics while on campaign has very little to do with their political decisions while in power. To me, the only things that should really matter are, in order of importance; A. their intelligence and broader competency B. their position on _specific_ political issues e.g. GM crops, nuclear energy, HS2 (a controversial railway line)...etc C. their broader ideological positioning. On those grounds I really don't see much difference between Obama and Hillary other than Hillary having more political experience (which I count as a good thing). A Hillary presidency would be, as far as anyone can reasonably predict, a continuation of Obama's. That may be a good or bad thing, depending on your point of view, but regardless it's hardly a political earthquake. But, because American news media and society loves to obsess over character and the individual so much, that fact seems to have been obscured. I don't mean to sound superior here - in the UK we have our own issues - it's just something I've noticed.
Competence and passive responsibility, both, ought to be the aspiration of the American Presidency and the focus of the electorate. The conundrum we face is being forced to choose one over the other. I cannot attribute our tendency to obsess over character to any one thing, but I think it is the combination of media entrepreneurship and overall national adolescence. We've only been a superpower for a century, and yet both major technological revolutions in information-sharing (i.e. television and internet) occurred in the past half century. We find ourselves deferring more to entertainment than to history books; popcorn over bananas. Evidently, this election is the result. Clinton 2016.
Watching this today in 2024 makes me even more depressed. I hope you’re happy with no more mean tweets, to go along with no more money in Americans pockets. Enjoy the inflation Bo Jiden has caused with his incompetence and unwillingness to do anything to help the country. He’s just busy filling pockets
Sanders' speeches didn't leave people marveling at his "political skills". They left people marveling at his integrity and ability to speak like a normal person in a position of power. Which is in large part what politicians are supposed to be. Vox does a lot of great things, bringing attention and education to lots of topics that deserve it. But viewers should be careful not to mistake a well-supported opinion for fact, and should not stop their train of thought when the video ends. Vox's productions make it very easy to do both of those things. Especially when Ezra Klein himself steps in front of the camera.
Maybe it's because most of those critiques are overstated or not true. After all, journalism doesn't have to confirm all of your preconceived theories.
@@brandonmccollum4921 Well I mean he has abused human rights, mismanaged coronavirus horribly, made a negative impact on Jobs, and has not been helpful to international relationships. I mean at least Hillary wouldn't have made a moral equivalent between White Supremacists and Antifa, ignoring the facts about the impacts of each organization.
@john riva and @Drake Productions Well the problem here is that's the only parts of the protests that you're allowed to see. There are two parts to this: 1. Because there isn't any central authority in protest it's considerably easier for the news to interview the Police rather than the protesters (a Police officer is considered a more credible source of information and you have to interview only one person at the top to get the Police side of the story where as you would have to interview dozens if not hundreds to get the protesters side of the story). 2. The news generally want controversial content to keep the audience entertained even if that content is not representative of the protest as a whole (it's simply more profitable). That results in the 0.1% of the most violent protesters being shown and covered while the vast majority of the protesters are rather peaceful. Thank you for coming to my TED talk. EDIT: I feel like I should clarify that I'm not taking a side, I'm not even an American, I just watch American politics for fun.
Why do people consider this bias? Pointing out positives and negatives on a subject is not biased. It's not biased to say that ice cream tastes good but is unhealthy.
Notice how the tone of music changes from when he describes her cons vs the uplifting music played when he describes her positives. Sorry but i also say this is subliminally biased.
Tom Tom did you only watch the first 5 minutes? Because his discussion of "The Gap" as he called and as you caps-lock summarized was not the bulk of the video... nor the key takeaway. I have no strong pull towards her or Trump. This video did not come off the way you've described.
The elephant in the room is that she's a woman? Really? I would say the elephant is the long list of controversy and scandals she's directly involved in.
My jaw dropped when he said that BS. It's this kind of disingenuous journalism that makes me turn away from Clinton (aside from her actions and words). It's like seeing someone step on your foot and them denying it to your face.
yeah im done. People don't like her cuz she IS shadey as hell, she DID rig the entire democratic campaign, she IS cold, calculating and manipulative. End of story
+Aveline De Grandpré No. It's mostly that she's a liar. If anything she uses her sex to her advantage, as she's said multiple times "women need to get out and vote for me, we need a woman in office." To say that her sex as inhibited her is a lie as she beat better qualified male and female democrats to become the nominee.
+Aveline De Grandpré what are you taking about once again? His failed businesses are just that. Failed businesses. He lost money, he's been ridiculed to no end for his failed businesses and he's lost tons of money because of those ventures l. You're wrong so please stop making yourself look not so intelligent.
Listening was never something what was treasured in the American politics. Show is that what’s counts. That’s why we now have a clown as a president who entertains us every day
+Vinny Lauricella - I dunno. I surely wouldn't if I was her or part of her campaign team. I thought it didn't sound particularly flattering or supportive. But that's just my take & you obviously have another.
Remember when she voted for the Iraq war? Even though 30 Democratic Senators voted against it. Was that listening to the people? Was that "getting the job done"?
hey jude A mistake is spilling your coffee. It's not voting to authorize an unjust war. You don't just get to say "sorry". There was a lot of push back against this war. Especially from the Democratic party. And she still chose to vote for it. That's unexcusable.
@@idenree8606 like 13% of the things Hillary has said were fact checked as false and for other people it’s way higher, including Donald Trump. She is a brilliant woman that has gotten incredible work done through her career and people like you just want to slander her and put her down
@@kamronramelmeier9264 ". She is a brilliant woman that has gotten incredible work done through her career and people like you just want to slander her and put her down" Whatever drugs you're taking please give them to me.
@@kamronramelmeier9264 you realize that what you said doesn't contradict my comment, right ? And Every time I argue with someone about a politician and they vaguely say that the person has done " incredible work " they usually don't know anything about that politician. So I'm guessing you only love Hillary because she's a women.
For those of us not in the USA and not biased to one party or the other, this is a fascinating, fair and honest review of Hilary Clinton. Well done Vox.
But this really is dishonest, the video never really covers the most controversial things about Hillary like the Clinton Foundation and her frequent flip-flopping when it comes to social issues. Plus Vox has been notorious for running a negative ad campaign against Hillary's enemies, just look at how they treated Bernie Sanders.
To be fair, Vox has a past record of _heavy_ democratic bias, so it isn't unreasonable to immediately think this is going to be brainless propaganda. Turned out it wasn't. I thought it was strange there weren't _much more_ dislikes until I watched the video. I will say that the core of the video is a bit vacuous in trying to convince us that "she listens." Some of the Clinton history was good to learn, but I would prefer them try to convince me that "she is principled" rather than "she listens"; the loudest voices tend to be the ones with lobbyists. I also didn't appreciate the gendered comments; gender should be completely irrelevant to this discussion.
Even though I am watching this video 3 years and 8 months after it was made, it's content is no less relevant as we draw to the end of Trump's first term. This video explains so much of how & why Trump won, but also it explains much about human nature, and how Trump can win a second term. Clinton the Listener, vs Trump the Talker; People like hearing someone telling them simple solutions to complex problems. But, people don't expect or want to have to explain to an electoral candidate what the problems are, because they expect the candidate to somehow know and completely understand already, and to sound authoritative about it. And this is where human nature is at its most frail and most exploitable. I also see now how Clinton got foul pressed. Even I fell for it. 😕
Not really, Clinton is a terrible person and politician. Sure they blamed her for Benghazi when it wasn't her fault but she's still a terrible person lol
George George anybody with half a brain. She said rich people are oppressed, has private and public’s opinions, took 100s of millions from big banks and corporations. There’s a reason her approval rating was trash.
True, the progressive agenda for the democratic party is definitely a good thing, though I will mention that she hired Debbie Wasserman Schultz. That was a twist of the knife.
In what way? Being responsible for the deaths of thousands of children? Wake up, enough is enough. Truly educate yourself and do your own research before it’s to late. Philippians 2:10-11
This is kinda irrelevant, but... "Hilary Clinton has been a major political figure in my whole adult life."... err what? She's 70, you're 30, she's been a major political figure in your whole life.
Yeah, like it or not! And it's a GOOD thing that we have a female Presidential candidate that KNOWS WHAT SHE has on her plate as U.S. President! Unlike POMPOUS narcissistic,Trump!!!
The point I think he was trying to make was that most other political figures, especially during this 2016 election haven't been as visible in their careers.
Some of the negative things 'people say about her' is that ''She is a liar, corrupt, and highly untrustworthy.'' For a part, that´s based upon - and rightfully so - the moment at 12:17. Hillary denies a crime. The director of the FBI proves at 12:24 she's lying publicly. If you think that those facts are just sexism, it means you believe she should get away with this. That's wrong.
i dont have a single thing i dont like about her because she is a woman i hate her for who she is and the crimes she got away with. Your ignorant to the truth because of the propoganda you have been watching.
have you heard anything people say about Donald Trump????? racist sexist idiot i can go on and on... Sexism is an excuse people use to cover up the fact that she is untrustworthy.
Aveline De Grandpré Because thats what the left does. They kick and scream at the right saying there the cause of americas problems meenwhile destroying it from the inside
This is nice to know, I enjoy hearing how she actually possibly works. Too bad there's a man who has a hard time listening to anything but selective people, as president right now.
THE CLINTON FOUNDATION ,IRAN DESTRUCTION ,SYRIA DESTRUCTION ,LIES LIES LIES ,SINCE WHITEWATER SHE IS THE SHE DEVIL ,SHE LISTENS ,TO USE THIS KNOWLEDGE ,TO BETTER FULL YOU AT THE END ,DOING WHAT SHE WANTS!
No what Ms Kimberly is saying is, if you oppose Clinton for Iraq War, then you must also oppose Bush and the Republican Party too. Otherwise you are contradicting yourself.
Noor Khabbaz Not voting? I am talking about the people who would like to vote for a 3rd party but don't because that party doesn't win. You have to vote for the person you support and not vote against the one you don't support.
qwertyasdf1302 Can't tell if you are trolling or just stupid... If you would like to make an actual point feel free, but I don't let trolls spam my posts, sry.
***** You do realize they mentioned him in the video? I didn't just come here to bash Hillary. They said Hillary listens and Bernie is more of a speaker.
conan263 And if I were him I would have done the same thing. Trump is a much worse candidate than Clinton. And why would voters get a refund for a donation.
conan263 I think America has survived crooked politics for years. It's nothing new. She at least has a lot of experience in government unlike Trump. Trump has had many failures and crooked dealings as a business man. Simply I don't think he is smart enough to run the country. And lastly the money donations to his campaign was used for many purposes like paying any of his paid staff, plane trips across the country, security at rallies, and renting out places to have campaign events. The joke is only on the uninformed like you.
Despite the very Pro-Hillary present bias, I think this is still a very fascinating and informative video. But take it down a notch next time, I like my press neutral.
Oh most definitely, though the number of such unbiased outlets grows smaller every day, I feel like. But I still like to watch a wide array of sources from all sides, I see the spin and acknowledge it, because the bias itself is also useful information. If I want to keep fighting against the drones of Hillary or Trump, I have to take a second to listen to their warped perspectives too.
R. W you're right, the Morgan's married into the Rothschild family. But the Rothschild family's wealth is so spread out now, so they don't really control things like they used to.
This really reminds me of what happened in Australia with our (also first female) prime minister Julia Gillard. Like Hillary, she entered government with a strong, almost incredible track record of getting sides to agree to things. She was well regarded and had personal friendships even with the other side of politics. She made a deal with three highly diverse members to form minority government and they supported her throughout. But like Hillary, she was branded as a "liar" as soon as the Right had some dirt to throw. They picked up on a broken statement she made pre-election to have no carbon tax to address climate change, and hung on it relentlessly. "Axe the Tax" was their Bolshevik-style motto. She was a liar, untrustworthy, the least believable of any prime minister in history. Her negotiated compromise and rational governance was attacked by the bitter losing party as "weak". Any attempt to point out the obvious sexist overtones of her criticism (calling her a "witch") was met with the charge of PC bigotry or reverse sexism. And so it went on, even as she kept making good policy with a minority government. Eventually, the far-right led Abbott government won out, but their unencumbered majority rule was overturned in less than two years as he broke promise after promise, making gaffe after gaffe and failing to cooperate with anyone. I think a similar thing is happening at present with Hillary. Sure, she has done some dodgy stuff, and she is influenced by big business, but she's hardly the most corrupt or dangerous US politician in history! Maybe try asking Henry Kissinger? She has been cleared of all serious wrongdoing. Yet I foresee a future in which the same small cabal of right wing mudslingers will take her down like they never could take down Obama. He was too strong, but she might be vulnerable. And that means that American political discussion (if you didn't think it possible) will reach yet another low.
Another brilliantly made and well put together video Vox. Could you make a video explaining how you still believe that someone who's already committed treason is the best person to entrust as president.
Pure propaganda? It's stupid people like you that fail to accept the reality that's she's HUMAN, believe it or not. You're not even TRYING to consider that because you have so much HATE towards her.
You don't usually see flaws and concerns in a propaganda piece. Being indecisive when flooded with contradicting ideas in a crisis is an incredible bad characteristic for a president, and he outlined that clearly and fairly. Sure it was softly framed in a way short of saying, "Hopefully she'll work on that.", but it was the main theme of the piece. She listens well and it is very helpful, but it also back fires to the point of blowing up in her face. Looks like a fair statement to me.
I've watched the video, and correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a big part of the argument the fact that some of these people don't work for Hillary anymore? Look, I'm not picking a side here, I'm not even American, I watch American politics for fun, I just want to know whether it's me or you that misunderstood something.
They openly pointed out this issue in the video. The Goldman Sachs scandal seemed more like naivete on her part, and she deserves to be held accountable. The rest of her pandering for fundraising is just how the system works these days. Don't hate the player, hate the game.
so she's either corrupt and takes their money despite knowing the bad they do or she's dumb and thinks they want nothing for their donations. Either way she shouldn't be the nominee
it's a fundamental problem with politics in this country and if the DNC hadn't rigged the primaries we'd have an unbought candidate with Bernie Sanders. The media can talk about the source of the leaks which proved this all day but the content is undeniable
Who exactly do you think she is lobbying for, and what gives you the impression that Trump doesn't or wouldn't also accept money from lobbyists? Do you think filthy rich people have no desire to obtain even more money? News flash: Trump loves money and is comfortable with lying. He is a salesman, and you're being suckered.
Actually the journalist guy is wrong. This guy is obviously not a trained lawyer (not even close). As a lawyer, you are not supposed to have presupposed positions and what you need to do is to formulate the most solid arguments for your clients.. She listens and spots the issues immediately because she is that good of a lawyer. When you are on a defense team, you are not going to care if the other team members just tried to kill your mother, you focus on doing what is best for your clients. The ability to work on behalf of the people without regards for personal feelings is exactly the reason why people on her team admires her but those who dont understand her find her cold and pretentious. But make no mistake, she understands politics and she understands people. When she becomes the president, be warned Republicans, that can may be the first of many Democratic years to come.
@tiernan wearen you misunderstand. To give an example of what this person means, I scrolled down and saw 1 argument about Mitch, 2 about Bernie vs Hillary, and like 8 on Trump so far
To all of those who called this video a propaganda, do us a favor and look up the word, then come back and find anything that is and isn't. If you did find parts that aren't propaganda, then it isn't.
This is not so much propaganda, as false. People around Clinton have only reported they despise her. This video clearly exists to change people's thoughts and it's obvious this journalist has received bonus money to make it since it trashes his credibility.
I'm a passionate Hillary supporter. I have been all my life. I heard some harsh things about Hillary in this video that I disagree with. So I sat back and said to myself "Hmm, that is another way of looking at it." My opinions have not changed, however, I have more information now and feel like a more informed human being. Maybe because I didn't put my fingers in my ears and go "lalalalala" the second I heard something I didn't like. Instead I-here's the kicker-listened.
Derek Armstrong : The Clintons, combined, are worth $249 million according to Forbes Magazine. Nothing to laugh at, but considering she and Bill have published several hot-selling books and the fact that each of them are in high demand for speaking gigs, not outside the honest if overpaid world. Not being familiar with her thinking about war, I can't offer anything on that, but I will say it sounds like typical anti-Clinton opinion. I'm not a particular Clinton fan but when you compare her to Trump as a politician, there's no debating the difference. Judging by your comment I'd say you're influenced by anti-Clinton sources. I suggest you keep your mind open and not buy into the conspiracy theories. I realize Bill Clinton is widely disliked, including by me, but Hillary is not Bill and if the choice comes down to she or Trump, it's a no-brainer.
Rock About ?? You’re a Clinton shill. Hillary Clinton received large amounts of donations from corporations and even went so far as to allow deregulation of campaign financing that Obama put into place within the DNC. Which shows she isn’t an honest politician but instead shows that she is a corporatist democrat at heart, no different from Bill Clinton. On war, she’s a warhawk. She voted for and supported the Iraq war. Which was a disaster and she only opposed it when the political climate made it essential for her to do so if she wanted to keep her position. She supported and played a vital role in the Libyan intervention. Which turned Libya into a giant warzone with a government that has failed to install order ever since its creation. The Libyan intervention also is the reason why the refugee crisis is so bad. She wanted a no fly zone and boots on the ground in Syria in the midst of a civil war and when Russia had a carrier battlegroup off the coast of the country and were conducting air operations. A no fly zone alone would cause massive political tension with Russia, possibly even a war. There is also the fact that she was spouting some serious anti Russia rhetoric and was being extremely disrespectful towards Putin. She also supported and sought after regime change in Venezuela and Iran. Both cases would turn those countries into war zones. The final fact here is that she was a massive flip flopper. I’m not even going to list all the examples because there’s too many. Edit: it’s not too bad she lost. It’s a good thing. She would of been a foreign policy disaster and 100% would of failed to bring back jobs and stop offshoring
The Joker: If support for a candidate who opposed the criminal Trump means I'm a shill I'll have to plead guilty. Clinton's State Department behavior is held out as self-serving by her detractors, a position that is not unsurprising. Myself, I would not rank her as particularly accomplished at State and I will say only extraordinarily capable secretaries can be regarded as effective given the complexities of world affairs today. Of course everyone has their opinion of her and how she's regarded is informed strongly by people's opinion of her husband. It seems she's now destined for lifelong detraction. No actions by a Secretary of State will escape criticism - it goes with the job. Spouting the opinions put forth by the likes of Breitbart and Gateway Pundit, though, is more hit-piece than helpful.
the more I read the ridiculous comments that were done a year ago and where we are now I hope that those people have figured it out that what they thought was stupid but I doubt that's the case
Right, it's evident now that it's better when Trump won, because he didn't nuke California yet, he mostly just did what George W Bush would do as well, and Bernie is now the frontrunner for 2020, which means we'll probably see real change by 2021
TheMaryam1891 Na, Trump isn't really worse than Bush (unless he nukes something, which he hasn't yet), so now with Hillary out of the scene, Bernie is the frontrunner in 2020, which will likely mean he wins, meaning we'll see fundamental change in America from 2021 on. From campaign finance reform, to a more peaceful foreign policy, to universal healthcare
Fiona Tanzer Very funny, so if the Russians had done one ad for Hillary without her consent, then she would have been compromised for the election as well? Stop being a hack
I love Vox. I love how they speak slowly, give you examples, and seem to have put forth a lot of work before making a video. I also like the way they talk to us. I'm not talking about this video specifically. I'm talking about all their videos.
I have clearly been too biased towards Hillary Clinton, I've focused on the things she has done in the past, the bad ones, yet I have ignored the good in her. Not only does she have the experience, she also stand for many people rights and care for each individuals. To have referred to only the deeds in the past does not represent her as a whole , but that was what I did. However, since I have now seen both sides, I am supporting her next elections along side Bernie, hopefully
This is what political analysis really is. Not speculative opinions seen on every major news network. Yes, Everyone has a bias, and it is seen in reporting even here. But analyzing requires actual analyzing like this. Major News networks just want to entertain, they could care less about anyone they actual talk about. I would love to see more from more candidates. I have a lot of respect for this video and the process it took to describe things. +1 sub
You don't talk like a normal politician, so I'm gonna agree with you. You don't use a teleprompter, so I'm gonna agree with you. You say out loud what I was thinking, so I'm gonna agree with you. You have the same fears as me, so I'm gonna agree with you. You are the same religion as me, so I'm gonna agree with you. You are the same color as me, so I'm gonna agree with you.
Wow, just wow. An excellent video that makes me feel like I can understand the way she's going to be working, and humanizing her... Honestly, the profile piece was very even-handed, with a fair amount of criticism of her personality, without going too overboard In painting her in a negative nor positive light; rather it treats her as a human being, something many reporters fail to do. The video is rife with criticisms of her work, for those who don't actually watch it. It's a good one.
Media opinion, personal opinion and EVIDENCE. Look at what she has done instead of focusing on how she is. This election is more about the candidates than the policies wtf
I think what Olov is saying to focus on the policies she's supported/put forward, and not on rhetoric and gaffes. Don't consider her "robotic demeanor," consider her work at the State Department or in the Senate.
Yeah Snow, what davidwave4 said. Don't focus if she is a good person or a bad person. Look at what she has done and what you think she will do. It doesn't really matter if u think she cold or a nice person to hang with
The video probably assumes you already know what she has done, which is why it's explaining the reasons behind her actions. I'm guessing people thought this was propaganda because he first explained why people liked clinton, and people quit the video before he could explain her weaknesses and what caused her bad decisions.
If I recall, Vox did have pieces on how would govern around the time of the 2016 primaries/election and aired like a 44 minute interview with Bernie. This just happens to be a video focusing on Hillary.
He was not. That's why he lost in the primaries. Bernie would never have been able to defeat Trump. He can't win in the primaries, you are taking about national election. Primaries should be an indication of what MAJORITY people want. And it's not Bernie. This is been proven TWICE, in 2016 and 2020 primaries. He refused to concede for the longest time against Hillary.
For everybody who's disliking the video without watching and assuming that Vox is too liberal, just watch the whole video ffs. They do criticize her towards the end (which I know will give all you Trump supporters a hard on)
Vox isn't liberal. They're the Washington bubble incarnate, if you want to give them the benefit of the doubt. 3/4 of this video presents a most sugar coated interpretation of events, with only the last 1/4 being remotely neutral.
***** Hillary isn't liberal either. No liberal or progressive worth their salt buys that. Only her party hack friends regurgitate that nonsense. Her platform is "No We Can't", and is built on curbing liberal momentum. She prides herself on being a "centrist", and even that would be a strange term, considering that she's not ideological, but simply bought exactly like most politicians instead.
To be fair most of America is moderate. A little left and a little right, but not hardcore one way or the other. That's the people that lie beyond 1 standard deviation from the mean. That's why we put them on TV. It's not normal and thus entertaining.
***** She's done a lot more obviously bad stuff that isn't conspiracy level. Like refer to blacks as super predators, or help someone she knew was a child rapist not get sent to prison. Or the fact that she supported openly racist politicians the same time Bernie was marching with mlk. Also add all the Gates she's been involved in and the massive number of lies. I'm actually not even right wing and neither are many of the people that despise her.
***** She still said it. She apologised for her image, not because she knows it's wrong. And no, the child rapist thing is factual. And she talked about how happy she was to be one of those girls that followed the guy. It had nothing to do with following her father. Oh yeah and we can add the fact that she was good mates with that KKK guy. She's the typical corrupt politician.
***** The fact that she's still clearly a racist AND her massive number of proven lies shows she was being genuine. And read the snopes thing, they never deny she did it, they try to imply she regrets it, based on nothing. No she did this later on And funny that she's taking so much money from the KKK then. More than trump and They're supporting her too. I doubt he truly regrets his affiliation. And she hasn't turned away from anything. At best she's flip flopped. And I'm not an anyone supporter. I used to think she was Ok and that Trump was awful, then I actually looked into their policies and history.
Vox finally figured that to increase Hillary's winchances they need to stop making videos on how bad Trump will be and start making commercials for Hillary.
That is what's wrong with liberal media. Vox is a news site. Their job is to provide information in an objective way, not be an advertisement agency for Clinton.
I recently went to a Clinton rally and I can affirm this is true. she came to my university and at her speech she congratulated us on our recent football win, homecoming and some cool facts or issue about my school I didn't know and she implemented it in her speech by saying she had a plan for this already and went on explaining it. She also talked to us about her personal life in college and how she had faced some issues many of us are facing rn. She def seems a lot different in person
Just go to the Vox-Channels TH-cam page and search for and watch some "Hillary Clinton" content. Do the same for "Trump". After you watch some of the videos you should notice some liberal-biased tendencies.
exTerEX What about the defention makes this not baised?? Everyone is baised, and the fact that vox are funded by leftleaning orgs and people shows they have a clear intrerest to show a particular perspective on issues/news. I belive most newsshows and people are more or less biased though. I recommend to check out Steven Crowders response to vox's Antifa video if you want a clear example of how vox, in atleast that video, leaves out facts and picks out their facts beacause they have a certain bias. Its also great to mix between liberal and conservative newscoverigde to get a better idea of reality in my opinion!
rc-wingman liberal biased tendences=rational objective statements/arguments, in your mind anyway. You're vague statements highlight your ignorance. Fox News and Alex Jones has conditioned you to dwarf logic and choose opinions that are convenient for you.
Your points are right but that does not contradict my statement. If you mainly criticise one side and supporting the other fraction, than I would call it biased.
rc-wingman you're right, it is biased to point out Trumps many obvious, verifiable flaws, and not draw attention to Clinton's possible skeleton's in her closet, but considering that they probably were trying their best to influence people not to vote for Trump, I'll give them a pass.
This is why I subscribed to vox. Not to agree with me on everything. But to present a smart intelligent subject on a complicated issue where I agree with some aspects and disagree with others. Well done guys.
Preach
mmm
We all are just that. We just dont like Hollery.
Peach
I like that they bring in people that know wtf theyre talking about.
remember when we thought trump couldnt win
Now you have people who thinks Sanders and the other democrats can win.
Pankhuri Tandon Trump will mop the floor with Bernie. All he has to do is bring up Universal Healthcare and he wins all the elderly vote. Then says Bernie wants to expand social security and abortion rights and he loses the young vote then he has no one.
Hahaha... remember when people thought she could win 😂
remember when people thought sanders is the presidential candidate
he actualyl lost the public vote to hillary LOL, it was 55/45, in hillarys favour. the only reason trump was elected was bcs of the supervoters
I'm Filipino and I love watching American politics like I'm American, hahaha
American politics fanboy here! lol
let's put you to the tests.
pepe mujica was the president of which american country?
Filipinos are the most powerful race
@AnOriginal Name
that's not a name.
My guy, don’t move here, America is garbage, it seems like your fluent in English, so I’d suggest moving to Canada or the UK, they have more stable governments lol
Something tells me most people disliked this video without even watching the entirety of the video.
Raul Martinez
I watched the entire video. What's the take away? People that have a conflict of interest are willing to say nice things about Clinton. Idc what her personality is. I disagreed strongly with her policies. Things like her capital gains tax policy targets the middle class. No thanks.
The take away is that casual observers in American politics often view her as cold and not trustworthy, while people who actually work in politics and have worked with her describe her as brilliant and effective. But her weakness was that she is a great listener and that made her look like she did not take on a dominant role while she was campaigning and it lead to her being affiliated with the wrong crowd such as Wall Street investors.
Raul Martinez
Dude Clinton has a conflict of interest with the banks because of her privately taking millions of $ from them. I see this as a fact. Like the sky being blue. It's not a matter of opinion or open to interpretation. But still the reason I didn't vote, donate or volunteer for her is because I disagree with her policies.
Andy Shay how do u know this to be fact ?
Raul Martinez kind of like the millennial idiots that can’t even voice a single accomplishment from this two faced unlikable hag?
I don't blame her for not trusting the press. The main press in the U.S. is a disgusting joke.
she's part of the same deceptive corporate machine. you know, the one trump is supposed to be financing instead of figureheading.
She is finished. Kind of ironic it happened on anniversary of Benghazi
You can call it irony, I believe it was fate. Her hubris will be her downfall. It will make for an amazing story in the future.
Seems like a lot of folks resent an ambitious woman.. I think the other side is going to become overconfident.. There's still a ways to go and we've yet to have the debates.. Even though they're not perfect, the Democrats represent the good guys in the political process.. Win, lose or draw.. I'm riding with them.. 💪
True, but you can't win the presidency without them. She is usually good at forming relationships with anyone, except this group which is poor tactic when campaigning for presidency. This might be the point that Trump wins on. You can be a horrible person as long as you get more air time and never stop talking to the press. People will vote for whatever is on TV the most.
I tried to read her platform. It was long, detailed, and without any apparent unifying objective, theme, or principle. Now it all makes sense. That platform was written by everyone she ever had a conversation with together.
Its wasnt an election campaign, it was a solution.
@@marcusj1710 A solution to what?
The ideas were good. The problem was Hillary
@@kumbaya69421 People I respect have told me that before. But that makes it very confusing as to how she won the popular vote.
@@Sewblon becuse sometimes people want the ideas more than the person himself or herself.
"I did not have a sexual relation with that classified email"
-- Clinton.
"Obama is the Founder of ISIS"
-- Drumpf
"I love war" -Drump 2k16
Kind of is if you understand the what was happening on the ground.
"I don't like black people counting my money" - Drumpf
"If my daughter wasn't my daughter, I would **** her." -Drumpf
Wow imagine having a leader that listens. The current Cheeto couldn’t even directly answer a question from the press
if you think trumps bad, you should look at trudeau. this guy literally doesn't even mention the question and talks about something else
did you see the presidental debate?
123pni at least Trudeau is a decent human being
Wasn't it so funny when it said she inspires loyalty then showed her with bill clinton
Lol so true
Frank underwood gets things done too
Sounds like you're throwing Hillary under the train.
hahahahahaha :DD
"Make America White Again!" -Bleach, Donald Trump rallies & the KKK
So true lol
Of course, that's fantasy television. You do realize that right?
"She's a great listener alright"
- Goldman Sachs
"He's such a good investment."
-NRA
"He knows that global warming is WRONG!"
-MAERSK Oil
TFW Hillary is backed by the Koch bros.
Lord Harambe "She's know there's nothing wrong with FRACKING!"
-Big Oil
Lord Harambe interesting how being anti-hillary automatically makes people ASSume you're pro-trump.
I think part of this is the obsession with personality and character, over policies, that American politics tends to have. I'm British, and, generally speaking, we care much less about the characters of our politicians beyond whether they seem capable. Or at least, I do.
By that I mean I don't give a rats arse about the Prime Ministers family or pets or religious affiliation...etc...etc. I don't care if they are 'nice', 'confident' or 'love the country!', and even if I did, whether they can present those characteristics while on campaign has very little to do with their political decisions while in power. To me, the only things that should really matter are, in order of importance;
A. their intelligence and broader competency
B. their position on _specific_ political issues e.g. GM crops, nuclear energy, HS2 (a controversial railway line)...etc
C. their broader ideological positioning.
On those grounds I really don't see much difference between Obama and Hillary other than Hillary having more political experience (which I count as a good thing). A Hillary presidency would be, as far as anyone can reasonably predict, a continuation of Obama's. That may be a good or bad thing, depending on your point of view, but regardless it's hardly a political earthquake.
But, because American news media and society loves to obsess over character and the individual so much, that fact seems to have been obscured. I don't mean to sound superior here - in the UK we have our own issues - it's just something I've noticed.
Competence and passive responsibility, both, ought to be the aspiration of the American Presidency and the focus of the electorate. The conundrum we face is being forced to choose one over the other.
I cannot attribute our tendency to obsess over character to any one thing, but I think it is the combination of media entrepreneurship and overall national adolescence.
We've only been a superpower for a century, and yet both major technological revolutions in information-sharing (i.e. television and internet) occurred in the past half century.
We find ourselves deferring more to entertainment than to history books; popcorn over bananas. Evidently, this election is the result.
Clinton 2016.
A French fella here with quite the similar observation.
Couldn't have put it better my self, really accurate view
Kudos for the objectivism. Could you be more specific about A B and C?
I thoroughly enjoyed this analysis.
Hes not making it equal for himself, Trumps just trash.
Watching this today is so depressing....
lol, if you thought this was depressing a year ago I wonder what is it like now. Is there anything even below depression?
Well November is not that far away.
Let's wait and see if there is going to be any change.
I wake up everyday with a big smile on my face knowing that she will never ever ever be president. And that's a great thing.
Watching this today in 2024 makes me even more depressed. I hope you’re happy with no more mean tweets, to go along with no more money in Americans pockets. Enjoy the inflation Bo Jiden has caused with his incompetence and unwillingness to do anything to help the country. He’s just busy filling pockets
Sanders' speeches didn't leave people marveling at his "political skills". They left people marveling at his integrity and ability to speak like a normal person in a position of power. Which is in large part what politicians are supposed to be.
Vox does a lot of great things, bringing attention and education to lots of topics that deserve it. But viewers should be careful not to mistake a well-supported opinion for fact, and should not stop their train of thought when the video ends. Vox's productions make it very easy to do both of those things. Especially when Ezra Klein himself steps in front of the camera.
"Why don't YOU get a drink with Mitch McConnell?" - Barack Obama
How come you've covered her all this time and not discovered her pile of bodies, corruption, criminal business, etc?
theskeletonboi It's not about the "negative", it's about the actual stuff she did enough to send her to prison, not "perception".
The republicans are in the bag and should also be in prison. She's not in prison because the whole system is corrupt, like that website you work for.
And Pepperonic is going to be amazing!
Maybe it's because most of those critiques are overstated or not true. After all, journalism doesn't have to confirm all of your preconceived theories.
Or maybe it's because there's no journalism, only propaganda.
Remember when people acted like it was a hard choice between Trump and Hillary.......I still hate those people
I will forever hate those people
I didn't think it was a hard choice. Trump was a much better option
@@brandonmccollum4921 Well I mean he has abused human rights, mismanaged coronavirus horribly, made a negative impact on Jobs, and has not been helpful to international relationships. I mean at least Hillary wouldn't have made a moral equivalent between White Supremacists and Antifa, ignoring the facts about the impacts of each organization.
Brandon McCollum Also he’s a racist Cheeto
Admittedly, I used to think that way. It's something I've regretted ever since Trump started his stunts while in office.
America needs a leader that listens to its struggling people and helps rather than send the national guard to silence and control them.. smh
Listen? The only message these thugs are sending is hate and destruction.
@john riva and @Drake Productions
Well the problem here is that's the only parts of the protests that you're allowed to see.
There are two parts to this:
1. Because there isn't any central authority in protest it's considerably easier for the news to interview the Police rather than the protesters (a Police officer is considered a more credible source of information and you have to interview only one person at the top to get the Police side of the story where as you would have to interview dozens if not hundreds to get the protesters side of the story).
2. The news generally want controversial content to keep the audience entertained even if that content is not representative of the protest as a whole (it's simply more profitable).
That results in the 0.1% of the most violent protesters being shown and covered while the vast majority of the protesters are rather peaceful.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk.
EDIT: I feel like I should clarify that I'm not taking a side, I'm not even an American, I just watch American politics for fun.
@Nathaniel12345678910 why, he did everything he said he'd do
@Nathaniel12345678910 no the great depression was the worst the economy had ever been, and that lasted ten years, this looks to last like a year
@@poshmalosh14 the current recession is the worst SINCE the Great Depression.
Why do people consider this bias? Pointing out positives and negatives on a subject is not biased. It's not biased to say that ice cream tastes good but is unhealthy.
Anything that isn't in favor of "my" candidate is clearly just paid propaganda for "their" candidate.
This isn't a "pros and cons" video, it's a "EVEN THOUGH HER OPPONENTS AND THE MEDIA DON'T LIKE HER, EVERYONE WHO KNOWS HER SAYS SHE'S THE BEST"
Notice how the tone of music changes from when he describes her cons vs the uplifting music played when he describes her positives. Sorry but i also say this is subliminally biased.
Tom Tom did you only watch the first 5 minutes? Because his discussion of "The Gap" as he called and as you caps-lock summarized was not the bulk of the video... nor the key takeaway. I have no strong pull towards her or Trump. This video did not come off the way you've described.
are you kidding?
The elephant in the room is that she's a woman? Really? I would say the elephant is the long list of controversy and scandals she's directly involved in.
My jaw dropped when he said that BS. It's this kind of disingenuous journalism that makes me turn away from Clinton (aside from her actions and words). It's like seeing someone step on your foot and them denying it to your face.
yeah im done. People don't like her cuz she IS shadey as hell, she DID rig the entire democratic campaign, she IS cold, calculating and manipulative. End of story
+Aveline De Grandpré No. It's mostly that she's a liar. If anything she uses her sex to her advantage, as she's said multiple times "women need to get out and vote for me, we need a woman in office." To say that her sex as inhibited her is a lie as she beat better qualified male and female democrats to become the nominee.
and the bodies strewn out from arkansas to Washington over the past 3 decades!
+Aveline De Grandpré what are you taking about once again? His failed businesses are just that. Failed businesses. He lost money, he's been ridiculed to no end for his failed businesses and he's lost tons of money because of those ventures l. You're wrong so please stop making yourself look not so intelligent.
Listening was never something what was treasured in the American politics. Show is that what’s counts. That’s why we now have a clown as a president who entertains us every day
My HappySkin And your gonna keep having him for 4 years more 😘
Hahaha😂😂
@@maxleon4519 YEP! And another two term Republican after that.
William Kerr hahaha! You wish!
he literately suggested using uv lights and bleach to cure coronavirus!
Vox, you forgot to put the "I'm Hillary Clinton, and I approve this message." at the end.
I don't think she would, given the criticism in the second half of the video.
tori2dles
Hardly
But what if,
and wait,
she had nothing to do with the production of this?
Amie Mallich**still waiting**
What if...she did? **x-files theme song**
+Vinny Lauricella - I dunno. I surely wouldn't if I was her or part of her campaign team. I thought it didn't sound particularly flattering or supportive. But that's just my take & you obviously have another.
*Opens umbrella for Shitstorm*
Any room under there?
no umbrellas can save you from a Shitnado
+J.R. To the shitshelter
I feel like I need to put up dome shutters and bunker down in my house lol.
Aren't you using it for a cane, Doctor?
Remember when she voted for the Iraq war? Even though 30 Democratic Senators voted against it. Was that listening to the people? Was that "getting the job done"?
she already explained why she did that
hey jude She did it because she weighed the options and thought voted for it would be better for her career, since the war was popular at that time.
Wrong! She also has said it was a mistake. I like someone who admits they're mistakes. Trump will never do that.
*their
hey jude A mistake is spilling your coffee. It's not voting to authorize an unjust war. You don't just get to say "sorry". There was a lot of push back against this war. Especially from the Democratic party. And she still chose to vote for it. That's unexcusable.
I was one of the few people to genuinely like the Hillary Clinton that I saw from watching her speeches. Now I understand why.
August RempelEwert she’s a Wall Street sellout.
Really? You LIKE her?
I understand preferring her over other choices, but she's still a corrupt and lying politician.
@@idenree8606 like 13% of the things Hillary has said were fact checked as false and for other people it’s way higher, including Donald Trump. She is a brilliant woman that has gotten incredible work done through her career and people like you just want to slander her and put her down
@@kamronramelmeier9264 ". She is a brilliant woman that has gotten incredible work done through her career and people like you just want to slander her and put her down" Whatever drugs you're taking please give them to me.
@@kamronramelmeier9264 you realize that what you said doesn't contradict my comment, right ?
And Every time I argue with someone about a politician and they vaguely say that the person has done " incredible work " they usually don't know anything about that politician. So I'm guessing you only love Hillary because she's a women.
For those of us not in the USA and not biased to one party or the other, this is a fascinating, fair and honest review of Hilary Clinton. Well done Vox.
Lol as fair and honest as fox news
Legion Etrangere
Wow, you're a smart guy. Well done on your judgement.
Dane Rossenrode
It's not a judgement, it's an observation.
Do you think it's honest because you can verify that what they said is true, or because it seems like they're being honest?
But this really is dishonest, the video never really covers the most controversial things about Hillary like the Clinton Foundation and her frequent flip-flopping when it comes to social issues. Plus Vox has been notorious for running a negative ad campaign against Hillary's enemies, just look at how they treated Bernie Sanders.
this was one of vox's best article. glad they turned it into a video.
i can't believe theres so many people who dislike a video just because of the title... it doesnt even offend anyone
They are very easily triggered
To be fair, Vox has a past record of _heavy_ democratic bias, so it isn't unreasonable to immediately think this is going to be brainless propaganda. Turned out it wasn't. I thought it was strange there weren't _much more_ dislikes until I watched the video.
I will say that the core of the video is a bit vacuous in trying to convince us that "she listens." Some of the Clinton history was good to learn, but I would prefer them try to convince me that "she is principled" rather than "she listens"; the loudest voices tend to be the ones with lobbyists. I also didn't appreciate the gendered comments; gender should be completely irrelevant to this discussion.
Remember kids if you don't agree It's, bias or propaganda. Pick one or you can use both.
+Suedocode - Klein brought up the same point himself about "listening."
I dislike anything hillary related
Even though I am watching this video 3 years and 8 months after it was made, it's content is no less relevant as we draw to the end of Trump's first term. This video explains so much of how & why Trump won, but also it explains much about human nature, and how Trump can win a second term.
Clinton the Listener, vs Trump the Talker; People like hearing someone telling them simple solutions to complex problems. But, people don't expect or want to have to explain to an electoral candidate what the problems are, because they expect the candidate to somehow know and completely understand already, and to sound authoritative about it. And this is where human nature is at its most frail and most exploitable.
I also see now how Clinton got foul pressed. Even I fell for it. 😕
Not really, Clinton is a terrible person and politician. Sure they blamed her for Benghazi when it wasn't her fault but she's still a terrible person lol
@@justacollegestudent5147 lol
@@justacollegestudent5147
Yeah, but said who?
George George anybody with half a brain. She said rich people are oppressed, has private and public’s opinions, took 100s of millions from big banks and corporations. There’s a reason her approval rating was trash.
Just a college student do you actually have sources on that or are you just spouting nonsense?
I say we just re elect George Washington
I'm an abolitionist, so let's not
+Sporkredfox Ben Franklin then.
George Washington supported slavery. Try again.
Hamilton should finally get his shot.
tori2dles Nah. He was an elitist and anti-democracy.
Money talks and Hillary listens.
Money talks and Trump gets on all fours and squeals.
savage :)
H
Well, she even listened to bernie.
O.o That feels like a jab... but the statement is true... hmmmm.
Tristan Neal well, take it however you please ;)
I don't think she listened to Bernie because she cared about what he has to say, I think she just wanted to pander to his supporters.
what? she did the exact opposite and hired Tim Caine.
True, the progressive agenda for the democratic party is definitely a good thing, though I will mention that she hired Debbie Wasserman Schultz. That was a twist of the knife.
Never thought I'd say this, but.... I relate to Hilary Clinton.
In what way? Being responsible for the deaths of thousands of children? Wake up, enough is enough.
Truly educate yourself and do your own research before it’s to late. Philippians 2:10-11
Nah, but hopefully I’m responsible for yours
This is kinda irrelevant, but... "Hilary Clinton has been a major political figure in my whole adult life."... err what? She's 70, you're 30, she's been a major political figure in your whole life.
Yeah, like it or not! And it's a GOOD thing that we have a female Presidential candidate that KNOWS WHAT SHE has on her plate as U.S. President! Unlike POMPOUS narcissistic,Trump!!!
What about gary?
His whole "adult" life. Early 20's and up for most
The point I think he was trying to make was that most other political figures, especially during this 2016 election haven't been as visible in their careers.
This guys looks 45, damn is discusting
I feel like the host of this and nerdwriter1 would get along
As i Know nerdwriter isnt as biased as this guy.
Clinton is criticized for over half the video. Not biased enough?
DNj800 Of course he has political opinions. He's a very thoughtful guy. His channel just isn't about politics.
I like the way your brain thinks
Their voices sound exactly the same :-)
Vox make a video on clintons email scandal.
Like so Vox will see it.
2nd half of this vid
it's addressed in this video
It's addressed in this video, dumbass
Try watching the video in its entirety first.
like this and I'll fart in your ear.
She was ahead of her time. She would have been a great president.
Yeah, who would think a war hawk, a sociopathic liar, and a sellout wouldn't make a great president .
@@idenree8606 you're a just an ignorant person ,plain and simple.
@@jaymoraless why do I feel like you're the simple ignorant person who knows nothing about politics and just supports her because she's a woman.
Sure, her attempting to collude with the DNC to undermine and attack Bernie Sanders was so great. Amazing.
@@jaymoraless yes anyone who doesn't agree with my ideas is and ignorant person
The problem with "what people say about her" is purely based on sexism. Would a man get the same adjectives if he did the same things? Don't think so.
Some of the negative things 'people say about her' is that ''She is a liar, corrupt, and highly untrustworthy.'' For a part, that´s based upon - and rightfully so - the moment at 12:17. Hillary denies a crime. The director of the FBI proves at 12:24 she's lying publicly. If you think that those facts are just sexism, it means you believe she should get away with this. That's wrong.
i dont have a single thing i dont like about her because she is a woman i hate her for who she is and the crimes she got away with. Your ignorant to the truth because of the propoganda you have been watching.
have you heard anything people say about Donald Trump?????
racist
sexist
idiot
i can go on and on...
Sexism is an excuse people use to cover up the fact that she is untrustworthy.
Aveline De Grandpré Because thats what the left does. They kick and scream at the right saying there the cause of americas problems meenwhile destroying it from the inside
Clinton is just so ingenuine, she decides her policy positions by looking at the polls.
Now make a positive video about Trump.
There's nothing positive about Trump to make a video on.
He has a good brain...?
He builds things...? The best things...? They're huge...?
What kind of logic is that
Vox can show both sides of a lot of issues, but politicians aren't one of those issues.
They already did
This is nice to know, I enjoy hearing how she actually possibly works. Too bad there's a man who has a hard time listening to anything but selective people, as president right now.
"She gets things done" like the Iraq war and her intervention in Lybia.
krieginphern Jacobson You are aware that the Iraq war was started by Bush, right?
Like US has always done, invade countries, boohoo, surprise.
Shin Da At least we left. Or not so much. We didn't create the infrastructure to leave Iraq in a good state. Thus it devolved into what it is today.
THE CLINTON FOUNDATION ,IRAN DESTRUCTION ,SYRIA DESTRUCTION ,LIES LIES LIES ,SINCE WHITEWATER SHE IS THE SHE DEVIL ,SHE LISTENS ,TO USE THIS KNOWLEDGE ,TO BETTER FULL YOU AT THE END ,DOING WHAT SHE WANTS!
No what Ms Kimberly is saying is, if you oppose Clinton for Iraq War, then you must also oppose Bush and the Republican Party too. Otherwise you are contradicting yourself.
dang if only she had won. :(
A lot less people would've died that's for sure.
"What difference does it make?" as opposed to "I don't take responsibility at all"
@@brunoss.3273 A lot more died because of Obama and Bush
@@jimmykilcomons6438 so you're gonna spam this sentence in every comment now?
She is evil. Pure evil.
All people that vote for Hillary to not let Trump win are exactly what is wrong with America's politics.
and vice versa
Yeah, neither of them should win. This comment just makes me look like a trump supporter but I am not lol
cant we agree that trump would be worse? how is not voting helpful
Noor Khabbaz Not voting? I am talking about the people who would like to vote for a 3rd party but don't because that party doesn't win. You have to vote for the person you support and not vote against the one you don't support.
Bill Long Like come on you actually believe either Shillary or Dump will be good?
Imagine how 2020 pandemic would be different with a proper leader
Still bad under biden administration
this aged well
... From a hospital bed or perhaps prison ...
lmao
Stop this madness, she is a pathological liar.
+alexander nicholas what does that make Trump?
+ItsATrap A psychopath?
She's a good listener. Perhaps, but who is she listening to? Oh that's right, the 1%.
Cool potato
Well said
+qwerty You are offering evidence in support of the OP's claim...
qwertyasdf1302 Can't tell if you are trolling or just stupid... If you would like to make an actual point feel free, but I don't let trolls spam my posts, sry.
Cthulhu Christ Note to self, don't feed the trolls...
August Grosbøl-Rais
I can't tell which candidate you are describing but I don't like either of them, so no.
Listening? Bernie was listening to the people who need help the most.
Yeah but he is not an option anymore so you might as well look ahead now.
***** You do realize they mentioned him in the video? I didn't just come here to bash Hillary. They said Hillary listens and Bernie is more of a speaker.
VisibleSigns But I'm saying is he has been listening to what people want for years which is why he can speak on it with the passion which he does.
conan263 And if I were him I would have done the same thing. Trump is a much worse candidate than Clinton. And why would voters get a refund for a donation.
conan263 I think America has survived crooked politics for years. It's nothing new. She at least has a lot of experience in government unlike Trump. Trump has had many failures and crooked dealings as a business man. Simply I don't think he is smart enough to run the country.
And lastly the money donations to his campaign was used for many purposes like paying any of his paid staff, plane trips across the country, security at rallies, and renting out places to have campaign events. The joke is only on the uninformed like you.
why are all the comments about the channel being biased, because im from germany and for me it seemes pretty legitimate
it´s just odd how its every time about being biased and not about the information in the video
Normally vox isn’t that bad... especially when compared to fox (and friends). The right really hate it for some reason tho
How bout that muslim invasion? Never mind, you’ll probably go charged with a hate crime if you answer.
Tyrion Lennister Substitute Germany with Austria and I was thinking the exact same thing.
Joe Mamma... what muslim invasion? did I miss something? Have you ever even been to the country?
Still, she's the only thing inbetween us and the apocalypse.
*Trump is the apocalypse
And trump is the good guy
Wtf
Mike Wazowski She WHAT now??
Andrew C is not about supporting Hillary, is about not supporting Trump, Hillary is bad but Trump is worse. Wtf happened to America.
you mean like her warmongering in Libya?
"I didn't watch the video, but here's my opinion about it...."
Despite the very Pro-Hillary present bias, I think this is still a very fascinating and informative video. But take it down a notch next time, I like my press neutral.
Then you really should go to media outlets that present themselves as such. They do exist and Vox isn't one of them.
Oh most definitely, though the number of such unbiased outlets grows smaller every day, I feel like. But I still like to watch a wide array of sources from all sides, I see the spin and acknowledge it, because the bias itself is also useful information. If I want to keep fighting against the drones of Hillary or Trump, I have to take a second to listen to their warped perspectives too.
Vishal Singh Films That's an admirable position to have. I've lost a lot of respect for Vox because of this video.
no press is neutral. Especially Conservative news. Don't complain of liberal news being biased
+Onion Blaster I almost unsubscribed when they made that anti-gun video. Like just stay awayyyy from choosing sides.
I'll always wish that Hillary had won.
Same
I'll always be glad she didn't
same
She may listen, but she doesn't hear.
lol you do know thats a compliment right?
oh honey
You have it switched around mate.
That's pretty much a good thing
It's ok, mate, you tried.
Also, she listens pretty closely to the Rothschilds thats for sure ;^)
it's the MORGAN'S in the US. the Rothschild married into the Morgan's family.
Actually they're lizards.
She's a lizard person too.
It's both families (& others) against their common enemy...The people!
R. W you're right, the Morgan's married into the Rothschild family. But the Rothschild family's wealth is so spread out now, so they don't really control things like they used to.
Very well made video, I hope the dislikes don't discourage you from making these kinds of videos.
We dodged a bullet
This really reminds me of what happened in Australia with our (also first female) prime minister Julia Gillard. Like Hillary, she entered government with a strong, almost incredible track record of getting sides to agree to things. She was well regarded and had personal friendships even with the other side of politics. She made a deal with three highly diverse members to form minority government and they supported her throughout. But like Hillary, she was branded as a "liar" as soon as the Right had some dirt to throw. They picked up on a broken statement she made pre-election to have no carbon tax to address climate change, and hung on it relentlessly. "Axe the Tax" was their Bolshevik-style motto. She was a liar, untrustworthy, the least believable of any prime minister in history. Her negotiated compromise and rational governance was attacked by the bitter losing party as "weak". Any attempt to point out the obvious sexist overtones of her criticism (calling her a "witch") was met with the charge of PC bigotry or reverse sexism. And so it went on, even as she kept making good policy with a minority government. Eventually, the far-right led Abbott government won out, but their unencumbered majority rule was overturned in less than two years as he broke promise after promise, making gaffe after gaffe and failing to cooperate with anyone.
I think a similar thing is happening at present with Hillary. Sure, she has done some dodgy stuff, and she is influenced by big business, but she's hardly the most corrupt or dangerous US politician in history! Maybe try asking Henry Kissinger? She has been cleared of all serious wrongdoing. Yet I foresee a future in which the same small cabal of right wing mudslingers will take her down like they never could take down Obama. He was too strong, but she might be vulnerable. And that means that American political discussion (if you didn't think it possible) will reach yet another low.
Another brilliantly made and well put together video Vox. Could you make a video explaining how you still believe that someone who's already committed treason is the best person to entrust as president.
yes please vox
thank you!
not just since ww2, since always and he doesnt know what treason his
well between hillary and trump let's face it trump is garbage. that's why she'll win
This pure propaganda. I forced myself to watch until he began trying to justify Iraq. She is always strongly in favour of Iraq.
zzzzzzzz
Cute. You know who won't be sleeping? The hundreds of thousands she has helped murder.
Pure propaganda? It's stupid people like you that fail to accept the reality that's she's HUMAN, believe it or not. You're not even TRYING to consider that because you have so much HATE towards her.
Max Salgado Personal attack. Well done.
You don't usually see flaws and concerns in a propaganda piece. Being indecisive when flooded with contradicting ideas in a crisis is an incredible bad characteristic for a president, and he outlined that clearly and fairly. Sure it was softly framed in a way short of saying, "Hopefully she'll work on that.", but it was the main theme of the piece. She listens well and it is very helpful, but it also back fires to the point of blowing up in her face. Looks like a fair statement to me.
"Yes my boss is a nice person, make sure you report that"
I've watched the video, and correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a big part of the argument the fact that some of these people don't work for Hillary anymore?
Look, I'm not picking a side here, I'm not even American, I watch American politics for fun, I just want to know whether it's me or you that misunderstood something.
okay she's a good listener. But your gonna ignore who she actually listens to? the corporate donors and rich lobbyist
They openly pointed out this issue in the video.
The Goldman Sachs scandal seemed more like naivete on her part, and she deserves to be held accountable.
The rest of her pandering for fundraising is just how the system works these days. Don't hate the player, hate the game.
so she's either corrupt and takes their money despite knowing the bad they do or she's dumb and thinks they want nothing for their donations. Either way she shouldn't be the nominee
every politician listens to corporate donors and lobbyists. it's not a democrat thing or a republican thing, it's western politics.
it's a fundamental problem with politics in this country and if the DNC hadn't rigged the primaries we'd have an unbought candidate with Bernie Sanders. The media can talk about the source of the leaks which proved this all day but the content is undeniable
Who exactly do you think she is lobbying for, and what gives you the impression that Trump doesn't or wouldn't also accept money from lobbyists? Do you think filthy rich people have no desire to obtain even more money? News flash: Trump loves money and is comfortable with lying. He is a salesman, and you're being suckered.
is there a thumb sidways button
Actually the journalist guy is wrong. This guy is obviously not a trained lawyer (not even close). As a lawyer, you are not supposed to have presupposed positions and what you need to do is to formulate the most solid arguments for your clients.. She listens and spots the issues immediately because she is that good of a lawyer. When you are on a defense team, you are not going to care if the other team members just tried to kill your mother, you focus on doing what is best for your clients. The ability to work on behalf of the people without regards for personal feelings is exactly the reason why people on her team admires her but those who dont understand her find her cold and pretentious. But make no mistake, she understands politics and she understands people. When she becomes the president, be warned Republicans, that can may be the first of many Democratic years to come.
LOL
Don’t even wanna scroll down to see all the hate 🤦🏽♂️
@tiernan wearen you misunderstand. To give an example of what this person means, I scrolled down and saw 1 argument about Mitch, 2 about Bernie vs Hillary, and like 8 on Trump so far
To all of those who called this video a propaganda, do us a favor and look up the word, then come back and find anything that is and isn't. If you did find parts that aren't propaganda, then it isn't.
This is not so much propaganda, as false. People around Clinton have only reported they despise her. This video clearly exists to change people's thoughts and it's obvious this journalist has received bonus money to make it since it trashes his credibility.
The best lies are half truths. Great listener my ass.
You need an education badly.
did u know Uncle Sam was propaganda? most people don't and don't want to even acknowledge it as propaganda.
Do you have the transcripts of all the interviews you held with her colleagues ?
I'm a passionate Hillary supporter. I have been all my life. I heard some harsh things about Hillary in this video that I disagree with. So I sat back and said to myself "Hmm, that is another way of looking at it." My opinions have not changed, however, I have more information now and feel like a more informed human being.
Maybe because I didn't put my fingers in my ears and go "lalalalala" the second I heard something I didn't like.
Instead I-here's the kicker-listened.
lol, I'm voting for Hillary too but because I hate poor people.
+ultimate512 😂😂
No, if you listened you wouldn't support her.
.
"I DIDN'T PUT MY FINGERS IN MY EARS AND GO "LALALALALA"
AAAAHAHAHAHA
THAT'S THE WHOLE PREMISE OF BEING A CLINTON SUPPORTER AAAAAHAHAHAHA
It's too bad Clinton lost. She's an able politician. Americans would be safer and better regarded in the world.
No they wouldn't. She's as corrupt as Trump and loves war.
Derek Armstrong : The Clintons, combined, are worth $249 million according to Forbes Magazine. Nothing to laugh at, but considering she and Bill have published several hot-selling books and the fact that each of them are in high demand for speaking gigs, not outside the honest if overpaid world.
Not being familiar with her thinking about war, I can't offer anything on that, but I will say it sounds like typical anti-Clinton opinion.
I'm not a particular Clinton fan but when you compare her to Trump as a politician, there's no debating the difference.
Judging by your comment I'd say you're influenced by anti-Clinton sources. I suggest you keep your mind open and not buy into the conspiracy theories. I realize Bill Clinton is widely disliked, including by me, but Hillary is not Bill and if the choice comes down to she or Trump, it's a no-brainer.
Rock About ?? You’re a Clinton shill.
Hillary Clinton received large amounts of donations from corporations and even went so far as to allow deregulation of campaign financing that Obama put into place within the DNC. Which shows she isn’t an honest politician but instead shows that she is a corporatist democrat at heart, no different from Bill Clinton.
On war, she’s a warhawk. She voted for and supported the Iraq war. Which was a disaster and she only opposed it when the political climate made it essential for her to do so if she wanted to keep her position.
She supported and played a vital role in the Libyan intervention. Which turned Libya into a giant warzone with a government that has failed to install order ever since its creation. The Libyan intervention also is the reason why the refugee crisis is so bad.
She wanted a no fly zone and boots on the ground in Syria in the midst of a civil war and when Russia had a carrier battlegroup off the coast of the country and were conducting air operations. A no fly zone alone would cause massive political tension with Russia, possibly even a war. There is also the fact that she was spouting some serious anti Russia rhetoric and was being extremely disrespectful towards Putin.
She also supported and sought after regime change in Venezuela and Iran. Both cases would turn those countries into war zones.
The final fact here is that she was a massive flip flopper. I’m not even going to list all the examples because there’s too many.
Edit: it’s not too bad she lost. It’s a good thing. She would of been a foreign policy disaster and 100% would of failed to bring back jobs and stop offshoring
The Joker: If support for a candidate who opposed the criminal Trump means I'm a shill I'll have to plead guilty.
Clinton's State Department behavior is held out as self-serving by her detractors, a position that is not unsurprising. Myself, I would not rank her as particularly accomplished at State and I will say only extraordinarily capable secretaries can be regarded as effective given the complexities of world affairs today.
Of course everyone has their opinion of her and how she's regarded is informed strongly by people's opinion of her husband.
It seems she's now destined for lifelong detraction. No actions by a Secretary of State will escape criticism - it goes with the job. Spouting the opinions put forth by the likes of Breitbart and Gateway Pundit, though, is more hit-piece than helpful.
Rock About because a no fly zone in Syria, would make Americans be safer and better regarded.
I wonder how much money they got just to say this?
I wonder how much tinfoil you have on your head
Nothing, you sheep.
How do you know?
Clearly you didn't watch the damn video. They give a fair analysis, with positive and negative observations.
@randomguy5990 That wasn't the point...
You know who does both listening AND talking? Bernie Sanders.
the more I read the ridiculous comments that were done a year ago and where we are now I hope that those people have figured it out that what they thought was stupid but I doubt that's the case
Right, it's evident now that it's better when Trump won, because he didn't nuke California yet, he mostly just did what George W Bush would do as well, and Bernie is now the frontrunner for 2020, which means we'll probably see real change by 2021
Cheydinal you must be a bot.
TheMaryam1891 Na, Trump isn't really worse than Bush (unless he nukes something, which he hasn't yet), so now with Hillary out of the scene, Bernie is the frontrunner in 2020, which will likely mean he wins, meaning we'll see fundamental change in America from 2021 on. From campaign finance reform, to a more peaceful foreign policy, to universal healthcare
Cheydinal - let's not forget that the Russians were boosting Bernie Sanders in the 2016 election as well. That alone makes him compromised for 2020.
Fiona Tanzer Very funny, so if the Russians had done one ad for Hillary without her consent, then she would have been compromised for the election as well? Stop being a hack
I love Vox. I love how they speak slowly, give you examples, and seem to have put forth a lot of work before making a video. I also like the way they talk to us. I'm not talking about this video specifically. I'm talking about all their videos.
Well I was subscribed to Vox...
The greatest president we never had
I have clearly been too biased towards Hillary Clinton, I've focused on the things she has done in the past, the bad ones, yet I have ignored the good in her. Not only does she have the experience, she also stand for many people rights and care for each individuals. To have referred to only the deeds in the past does not represent her as a whole , but that was what I did. However, since I have now seen both sides, I am supporting her next elections along side Bernie, hopefully
Thanks for your support! I love Bernie and am grateful to Hillary. These things are not mutually exclusive.
its interesting to watch American Politics. *As George Carlin once said: "front row seat to a circus."*
from Australia with love!
You did a great job covering this. I liked your video. Upvoted.
Vox... your bias is showing.
It belongs to her daughter, as I heard.
+Maduranga Sirisena vox is owned by Chelsea?
Is this bias, or analyzing the facts and presenting them in their own way ?
Opinions = Bias?????
Retardosaurusrex For "journalism" yes...
This is what political analysis really is. Not speculative opinions seen on every major news network. Yes, Everyone has a bias, and it is seen in reporting even here. But analyzing requires actual analyzing like this. Major News networks just want to entertain, they could care less about anyone they actual talk about. I would love to see more from more candidates. I have a lot of respect for this video and the process it took to describe things. +1 sub
Vox before election: This is how Hillary will govern.
Vox after election: (crickets)
Why would they make a follow-up when she getting get elected?
You sound smart so I'm gonna agree with you
You don't talk like a normal politician, so I'm gonna agree with you.
You don't use a teleprompter, so I'm gonna agree with you.
You say out loud what I was thinking, so I'm gonna agree with you.
You have the same fears as me, so I'm gonna agree with you.
You are the same religion as me, so I'm gonna agree with you.
You are the same color as me, so I'm gonna agree with you.
Cool potato cool
Cool potato Cool potato not so cool. You don't deserve those shades.
j
VOX wtf! I will never trust the credibility of this journalist.
Wow, just wow. An excellent video that makes me feel like I can understand the way she's going to be working, and humanizing her...
Honestly, the profile piece was very even-handed, with a fair amount of criticism of her personality, without going too overboard In painting her in a negative nor positive light; rather it treats her as a human being, something many reporters fail to do. The video is rife with criticisms of her work, for those who don't actually watch it. It's a good one.
Hillary bots where you at?
Working at Vox
Beep boop Clinton is so bzzzt shutting dowwwn
outnumbering you.
RealComp5 Haha good one !
Talking logic and reason in the face of the despicable and hateful cries of the wingnuts who support Trump...
She listens and writes down talking points to win debates. Not policies.
#letgarydebate You have a third option America
What is Aleppo
LMAO
Gary Johnson is just as bad tbh
Will he have figured out where Aleppo is by the time the debates roll around?
He's a douche!
Shes pretty good at listening to her donors.
I always wondered about the "GAP". Thanks for this perspective.
We had one intelligent, strong, experienced, calm candidate who would also make history as first woman elected. And we had Trump.Yeah...hard choice..
Media opinion, personal opinion and EVIDENCE. Look at what she has done instead of focusing on how she is. This election is more about the candidates than the policies wtf
I think what Olov is saying to focus on the policies she's supported/put forward, and not on rhetoric and gaffes. Don't consider her "robotic demeanor," consider her work at the State Department or in the Senate.
Yeah Snow, what davidwave4 said. Don't focus if she is a good person or a bad person. Look at what she has done and what you think she will do. It doesn't really matter if u think she cold or a nice person to hang with
The video probably assumes you already know what she has done, which is why it's explaining the reasons behind her actions. I'm guessing people thought this was propaganda because he first explained why people liked clinton, and people quit the video before he could explain her weaknesses and what caused her bad decisions.
why is there no discussion about how Bernie Sanders would govern, why everyone's acting like he wasn't a stronger candidate than her.
If I recall, Vox did have pieces on how would govern around the time of the 2016 primaries/election and aired like a 44 minute interview with Bernie. This just happens to be a video focusing on Hillary.
well there is one now
He was not. That's why he lost in the primaries. Bernie would never have been able to defeat Trump. He can't win in the primaries, you are taking about national election. Primaries should be an indication of what MAJORITY people want. And it's not Bernie. This is been proven TWICE, in 2016 and 2020 primaries. He refused to concede for the longest time against Hillary.
She should've became president
She would have been an amazing POTUS. I doubt there will ever be a more qualified person.
For everybody who's disliking the video without watching and assuming that Vox is too liberal, just watch the whole video ffs. They do criticize her towards the end (which I know will give all you Trump supporters a hard on)
Vox isn't liberal. They're the Washington bubble incarnate, if you want to give them the benefit of the doubt. 3/4 of this video presents a most sugar coated interpretation of events, with only the last 1/4 being remotely neutral.
lol, Vox is in the bag for Hillary, always has been.
Don't kid yourself, Vox is a hard-left propagandist news source.
***** Hillary isn't liberal either. No liberal or progressive worth their salt buys that. Only her party hack friends regurgitate that nonsense. Her platform is "No We Can't", and is built on curbing liberal momentum. She prides herself on being a "centrist", and even that would be a strange term, considering that she's not ideological, but simply bought exactly like most politicians instead.
To be fair most of America is moderate. A little left and a little right, but not hardcore one way or the other. That's the people that lie beyond 1 standard deviation from the mean. That's why we put them on TV. It's not normal and thus entertaining.
I'm sorry M Kn, are you this objective when watching Fox News, of course not, and I don't blame you, like Vox, they are biased towards their party
At least she's better than Trump
They're both horrible.
+Hugh Mungus amen to that
she's worse than Trump
+Parker Wiles. I agree with you man. 🙏♎️👏👍😇
+Hugh Mungus 🍆
She does get things done. bad things.
***** if only that were true
***** She's done a lot more obviously bad stuff that isn't conspiracy level. Like refer to blacks as super predators, or help someone she knew was a child rapist not get sent to prison. Or the fact that she supported openly racist politicians the same time Bernie was marching with mlk. Also add all the Gates she's been involved in and the massive number of lies.
I'm actually not even right wing and neither are many of the people that despise her.
***** She still said it. She apologised for her image, not because she knows it's wrong. And no, the child rapist thing is factual.
And she talked about how happy she was to be one of those girls that followed the guy. It had nothing to do with following her father. Oh yeah and we can add the fact that she was good mates with that KKK guy. She's the typical corrupt politician.
***** The fact that she's still clearly a racist AND her massive number of proven lies shows she was being genuine.
And read the snopes thing, they never deny she did it, they try to imply she regrets it, based on nothing.
No she did this later on
And funny that she's taking so much money from the KKK then. More than trump and They're supporting her too. I doubt he truly regrets his affiliation.
And she hasn't turned away from anything. At best she's flip flopped.
And I'm not an anyone supporter. I used to think she was Ok and that Trump was awful, then I actually looked into their policies and history.
***** Says the person that thinks Hillary isn't an awful person
I love how you covered this story of Hillary Clinton!!!!!!!!! Kudos to you sir.💯
Vox finally figured that to increase Hillary's winchances they need to stop making videos on how bad Trump will be and start making commercials for Hillary.
Amazingly, it took until September for them to even start to adapt. Start. I wonder when they'll start to adapt to ethics.
That is what's wrong with liberal media. Vox is a news site. Their job is to provide information in an objective way, not be an advertisement agency for Clinton.
why do you mention ethics?
If this is a commercial he did a pretty crappy job by including all the criticism.
where is the criticism? (not being confrontational i just only see examples of hillarys personality in the video which seem neutral.)
"The mistakes she made as a senator wasn't because she was a bad senator. It was because she listened to the wrong people." Oh yeah, most definitely!
I recently went to a Clinton rally and I can affirm this is true. she came to my university and at her speech she congratulated us on our recent football win, homecoming and some cool facts or issue about my school I didn't know and she implemented it in her speech by saying she had a plan for this already and went on explaining it. She also talked to us about her personal life in college and how she had faced some issues many of us are facing rn. She def seems a lot different in person
so unbiased....:P. afraid to loose your sponsors VOX?
Just go to the Vox-Channels TH-cam page and search for and watch some "Hillary Clinton" content.
Do the same for "Trump". After you watch some of the videos you should notice some liberal-biased tendencies.
exTerEX What about the defention makes this not baised?? Everyone is baised, and the fact that vox are funded by leftleaning orgs and people shows they have a clear intrerest to show a particular perspective on issues/news. I belive most newsshows and people are more or less biased though. I recommend to check out Steven Crowders response to vox's Antifa video if you want a clear example of how vox, in atleast that video, leaves out facts and picks out their facts beacause they have a certain bias. Its also great to mix between liberal and conservative newscoverigde to get a better idea of reality in my opinion!
rc-wingman liberal biased tendences=rational objective statements/arguments, in your mind anyway. You're vague statements highlight your ignorance. Fox News and Alex Jones has conditioned you to dwarf logic and choose opinions that are convenient for you.
Your points are right but that does not contradict my statement.
If you mainly criticise one side and supporting the other fraction, than I would call it biased.
rc-wingman you're right, it is biased to point out Trumps many obvious, verifiable flaws, and not draw attention to Clinton's possible skeleton's in her closet, but considering that they probably were trying their best to influence people not to vote for Trump, I'll give them a pass.