I think that this is incredible. The additional parallel is present in Judaism. In the kabbalistic framework we can find nearly identical concepts with different terminology: ein sof/ ohr ein sof... Ohr yehida etc
Une compréhension mystique de la présence de la lumière divine (Nûr) dans chaque prophète ou représentants divins. Toutefois il faut être très vigilants pour ne pas tomber sur des faux représentants qui usurpent et profitent de la naïveté des personnes peu cultivées. ❤
Please explain where in Quran it say that we should ask Agakhan to forgive our sins and help us in many ways!! Any why have not all muslims become Ismailis? Also most Ismailis do not read Quran alike most muslims - why? 🙏🙏
People (who were at some point in past, were followers of sufi - mystical traditions) nowadays, show inclination towards more secular interpretations of islam and not towards those ,which are more mystical and spiritual in nature. Is this some universal phenomenon?
Well I would like t give my 2 cents and I might be wrong, going away from these sufi theology started in the early 20th century in the wake of scientific discoveries. There were many reformers / rationalists reading the quran through a scientific lens they thought these mystical experiences as some past dogmas. Maybe...
If you asked for my opinion, I would say its the opposite: the literalist views of Islam, also those which deny miracles, sainthood etc are the ones who brings atheism. I'm not a Muslim, but I'd make a comparison with Catholicism or Orthodoxy with Protestantism (sufis being the former two and literalists being the latter).
@@magnus8704 I agree in that Protestantism is more black and white. It makes a much harder definition between who is 'God' (and should be revered, prayed to, etc.) and who is 'not God' and should be respected but nothing more. The line really can't be crossed.
@@adamgulamhusein8768Have better comprehension skills. His argument isn't that this is Muslims position but that this is the position of the Islamic sources.
@@absolutedefender2081 You should have better comprehension skills before jumping to ad hominem. Nowhere did I say that is his argument. Nor did he say this is the position of Islamic sources. I am clarifying that his statement is an incorrect conclusion from the sources that Khalil provided. I did not want someone uninformed to take this as Khalil's thesis. There are no Islamic sources that take this stance, perhaps, instead of insulting people, you could read some of them.
Khalil is not officially endorsed to speak on Ismailism by Aga Khan (Imam of the Shia Imami Islam), his own spiritual leader. That may speak to his qualifications.
Am confused about the relevance of your comment and who, what you speak for...? Khalil's articulation makes clear, his understanding of the references he quotes from the Holy Quran.
I think that this is incredible. The additional parallel is present in Judaism. In the kabbalistic framework we can find nearly identical concepts with different terminology: ein sof/ ohr ein sof... Ohr yehida etc
Very interesting. Excellent work.
Une compréhension mystique de la présence de la lumière divine (Nûr) dans chaque prophète ou représentants divins. Toutefois il faut être très vigilants pour ne pas tomber sur des faux représentants qui usurpent et profitent de la naïveté des personnes peu cultivées. ❤
Very important topic
Khalil is such a smart guy I can’t believe he’s Ismaili
2:40 henceforth the concept of Khalif (of which all the Prophets and Imams occupy)
Please explain where in Quran it say that we should ask Agakhan to forgive our sins and help us in many ways!! Any why have not all muslims become Ismailis? Also most Ismailis do not read Quran alike most muslims - why? 🙏🙏
People (who were at some point in past, were followers of sufi - mystical traditions) nowadays, show inclination towards more secular interpretations of islam and not towards those ,which are more mystical and spiritual in nature. Is this some universal phenomenon?
Well I would like t give my 2 cents and I might be wrong, going away from these sufi theology started in the early 20th century in the wake of scientific discoveries. There were many reformers / rationalists reading the quran through a scientific lens they thought these mystical experiences as some past dogmas. Maybe...
If you asked for my opinion, I would say its the opposite: the literalist views of Islam, also those which deny miracles, sainthood etc are the ones who brings atheism. I'm not a Muslim, but I'd make a comparison with Catholicism or Orthodoxy with Protestantism (sufis being the former two and literalists being the latter).
@@magnus8704 correct
@@magnus8704 most atheists are responding to literalism which cannot deal with paradox, double entendres, allegory and the problem of evil.
@@magnus8704 I agree in that Protestantism is more black and white. It makes a much harder definition between who is 'God' (and should be revered, prayed to, etc.) and who is 'not God' and should be respected but nothing more. The line really can't be crossed.
Mohammed is allah and allah is Mohammed.
Jesus Christ is God.
Fool
No this is not the position of Muslims. Nor is it even close to Khalil’s thesis.
@@adamgulamhusein8768Have better comprehension skills. His argument isn't that this is Muslims position but that this is the position of the Islamic sources.
@@absolutedefender2081 You should have better comprehension skills before jumping to ad hominem. Nowhere did I say that is his argument. Nor did he say this is the position of Islamic sources. I am clarifying that his statement is an incorrect conclusion from the sources that Khalil provided. I did not want someone uninformed to take this as Khalil's thesis. There are no Islamic sources that take this stance, perhaps, instead of insulting people, you could read some of them.
Dr. Andani, don't you think it's relevant that in the Quran, Isa is kallimallah or The Word of God?
@@deojoandco Kalimat Allah in the Quran are many
I don't mean to be flippant but where can I see all the references to that word?
Khalil is not officially endorsed to speak on Ismailism by Aga Khan (Imam of the Shia Imami Islam), his own spiritual leader. That may speak to his qualifications.
Am confused about the relevance of your comment and who, what you speak for...? Khalil's articulation makes clear, his understanding of the references he quotes from the Holy Quran.