🇺🇸 Support the Channel🇺🇸 Kershaw: Use code 23Scholar20 for 20% off Join USCCA usccapartners.com/armedscholar BlackoutCoffee: www.blackoutcoffee.com/armedscholar Code: "ArmedScholar" for 10% Off
KERSHAW are a respectable name, but they tend to omit saying MANY OF THEIR KNIVES ARE MADE IN CHINA. The expensive ones are more likely to be made in USA.
It's not about the $200, it's about the list your name goes on. The AFT knows a braced gun isn't any more dangerous than a regular rifle; this is just the serpent's path to a "legal" registry. The only reason SBRs are in the NFA in the first place is because the OG gun grabbers couldn't persuade the courts to allow them to restrict handguns, and they thought this would provide them with leverage against our rights in the future.
@@CVMN-kf2qc Sorry, I must have missed where the OP talked about the reason SBRs were added to the NFA instead of handguns. You know, how it was because handguns were forbidden from being restricted in the NFA by the courts? Can you point it out to me? Since you seem to have some kind of impairment going on, I'll save you the trouble: No, you can't, because the OP didn't mention it, _nor was it implied._ It's called "adding to the conversation" and it's what grownups do when they talk. You should try it some time.
Actually the govmints own polls stats show that all arms ( even machine guns ) ARE IN COMMON USE. SEE GUNS AND GADGETS 👀. How many lives have been lost UNCONSTITUTIONALLY To home invasions DUE TO THE ENACTMENT AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE NFA and the GCA aka 1934 INFRINGEMENT and THE 1968 INFRINGEMENT 🙀😿👀😿😿😿😿😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
Yeah, see, they like to change the meanings of words when it suits their agenda (or else just ignore the meaning altogether). For reference, just compare the pre- and post-covid definitions of the word "vaccine."
I didn't come up with this, but I love the message: If the 1st Amendment applies to radio, tv, and the internet, and the 4th amendment covers electronic wiretapping and video surveillance, how can the 2nd amendment only apply to 18th-century firearms technology?
If you've watched all the videos of Congress grilling the ATF director and many others it's insane how this is even getting to this point it shouldn't even pass or even affect anyone according to what members of Congress say and ask
Do you notice how the government is trying to produce lawful theater for an illegal rule making by an administrative agency?, If they broke the law by making rules why can't the states just do the same thing and have their sheriff's go to town on the Feds when they cross into their county?
People that don't know about something( firearms) should not have any say so about anything to do with firearms..kinda lika a bartender being a congress lady.telling people how to live..😮
At what point do we address the actual problem of the unelected, unaccountable, politically motivated permanent administrative class, becoming a self feeding entity, and controlling interest in our Government?
what do you mean? that was the entire point of the system, by design... why do you think the electoral college was even conceptually put in place from the start?
@@masskiller9206 That was most certainly not the point of the system at all. The electoral college has nothing to do with anything he said. (Also, the electoral college was put in place to give smaller states a better chance at fighting against larger states in elections and is one of the main things that ensures we stay free.)
@@masskiller9206 That isn't correct. The electoral college was to be made of Congress selected, by congress to elect their executive officers. The Civil Service, which is the army of unelected, unaccountable, permanent staff, I am referring to, was never intended to exist. In fact, a majority of the founders expressly warned of that very system as the core reason for the corruption of other forms of Governance. That system was put in place after the Civil War to make the US government function more like the Corporate Empire system we broke away from in the first place, and then re-affirmed after WW2 along with the standing military, because the threat of Nuclear war brought real risk to the "Sophisticated" among us who had been able to remove themselves from the dirty realities of actual conflict before that. They are also the ones who codified the "continuity of government" nonsense that has led to the American war machine and the "Democracy"" we are being told has always existed at the expense of continuity of the Liberty of Citizens. The election of Senators, and the President/VP, was never meant to be done by popular vote or direct democracy. The idea being that the average citizen is either too busy with local/State affairs or too far removed from the National Issues to be burdened with that responsibility. They were meant to focus on creating stable local/State communities, and making certain they elected the wisest and most capable among them to represent them at the National level, which is also why the Federal Government has such strict restrictions placed on their scope. Modern Americans have a completely different understanding of our system than was intended, by design. The Republic has been usurped in favor of two competing ideas of elitists, neither a "Democracy" or an Empire were ever to exist on the N. American Continent. It was always intended that the Aggregate of Citizens who were invested enough in the long term health of the total Republic to risk their time, talents & treasure, to make sure it functioned, were to be the authority and structure.
Once chevron deference is dealt with, qualified immunity is shortly behind it. Then they will have no choice but to abide by 28USC-144, and 18USC-242 / 241.
when you think back on history, remember that only 250 years ago people were willing to fight the british & die just because their taxes were a little too high. compare with today, where people were locked indoors for a year+, businesses and careers ruined unless you bent the knee and risked your life for pfizer profits, and you see how weak and spineless the modern american has become. overweight, low testosterone, only willing to talk but never really putting any substance behind their actions. its a sad reality but you have to realize that when an idea has nobody willing to stand for it, that idea is dead. the pistol brace is just a minor wart on the festering tumor that is the weak & insane modern western society only 2 things you can do, keep talking or make a plan to get you and your family out of here as it only gets worse
I just want them to lose their ability to blackmail our rights away every time or something or gaslight people into thinking they've made laws when it's rules which is basically wanting us to follow it willingly even though it's not a law 😞
@Michael Well as of this past Monday. I watch a different channel. He the man who runs that channel. He decided to just put 1 "form 1" and UNDER 200K "Form 1's" have even been submitted. So I would like them see to try and "enforce " this bs!!..ATF better work non stop to go after them 38.8 MILLION law abiding citizens!!
@Michael let's be real about it for a second...there are no law abiders out there, just *perceived* law abiders. If you've ever jaywalked, rolled a stop sign, gone 5mph over the speed limit, etc. you've broken the law. Gonna be hard-pressed to find anyone out there that's never broke one of those laws. This rule is about the equivalent of any trivial stuff like that. It's gonna get little to no compiance, all the way up until the SC does away with this nonsense
Just don’t follow it. Bring them to court. First off, it's not a Law it's a rule and they have no jurisdiction to make laws. Second, it's unconstitutional.
What's sad is, I have a friend that literally has no use of one of his arms. He has to put it in his pocket with his good hand. He NEEDS this brace because of his disability. This isn't because they are just "Cool." They will do anything to go against our rights.
@@VictorSanchez-fi9lf Some people have friends. Also, I could easily remove or install a brace with one hand using my Tipton gun vise. Which I could also set up with one hand. Fortunately I have full use of both hands. But I have a friend who crashed a motorcycle and would need a brace.
What's also crazy is how can any judge not see that just as a bump stock doesn't magically make a machine gun a brace doesn't make an SBR anymore then a foam pad does.
Those who rushed and sent in their application to get that free tax stamp will be the first to be visited by the alphabet bois. They can't process all the stamps that would be applied for and therefore will be denied. And....now you've told them you have the pistol and brace...told them who and where you are. Simplified their leg work.
Although I agree with you to not register a damn thing, what that POS Dettlebach said was yesterday’s news. As the ATF has demonstrated time and time again, Dettlebach and the Gestapo at the ATF can change their mind every time the wind changes direction.
They changed their mind about everything else! They prosecute for unassembled parts all the time... They have prosecuted for having an unassembled stock "near" an AR pistol. He was a federal prosecutor. He is not telling the truth and he knows it.
Yup so start doing felon shit, it’s quite liberating when you realize that criminals founded the nation and free men are the criminals who don’t abide by unconstitutional shit.
It does not seem like owners of legally purchased and responsibly kept pistols with attached stabilizing braces are going to get relief before the ATF’s spectacularly gracious 120 days runs out. It really sucks the wind out of the law abiding, safe, moral, and prudent gun owner’s sails.
@@Raymo2u that's really the way we will have to overcome this. Clearly the courts have no interest in actually following the law either, so the only way will be mass non-compliance. Now that's easy for me to say given I don't have an ar pistol, but truly I would hope everyone wouldn't comply with this extortion.
You mean, it makes impossible to continue believing that this non-elected beuracacracy is really the benevolent child saving criminal targeting fairy tale they claim to be? Yes, yes it does.
IF per the ATF there are 7 million pistols with braces in the USA, and they are all SBRs....doesn' that mean there are over 7 million SBRs in the USA thus common use applies and they can't ban, tax or otherwise regulate them....
i love how they try to say SBRs are more dangerous than normal rifles but infact SBRs are less powerful due to incomplete powder burn and gas expansion.
Good grief tell me you don’t know what time it is without telling me. Just a completely irrelevant point. Spending waaaay too much time pointing out the flaws in their arguments. Meanwhile they laugh at you and steamroll you. They don’t argue, they’re playing to win. The gestapo labeled you enemy #1. He doesn’t give two craps about powder burns and dwell times. Knock it off with this garbage
Why isn’t anyone using the Bruen and Heller decisions to go after the Short Barrel Rifle prohibition of the NFA??? The ATF is saying, in the pistol brace rule, that the presence of a pistol brace turns an AR pistol into an SBR. OK, then let ATF have that opinion, but then the 800-lb gorilla enters the room…..Where is the historical analog from the era of the adoption of the 2nd A that shows government is permitted to legislate the length of a rifle barrel? Think about it. MILLIONS of AR pistols with braces were purchased LEGALLY, and are now commonly owned for lawful purposes.
if you care.. the SBR rule was created because MOST big cities even in the 1800s had a no concealed handguns rule and handguns were often not even sold in the city so criminals ( like now) just went around the law bought hunting rifles and shotguns and chopped them down to fit under coats and jackets and in small containers. I AM NOT A SUPPORTER OF THIS LAW it no longer applies in its intent i just thought youd like to know why it was created other than ( the govt) just being a dick to everyone
That was a logically flawed ruling and could use an update with real teeth for the Second Ammendment. US V Miller was 1934 or 35 and basically was scotus good old boy nod that "sure you restrict a protected right if it's for safety...." it should not stand.
1939, actually, but oh well. The NFA was written in 1934. Miller has teeth to it, but no one uses it properly- it specifically lays out a rubric of what (at a minimum) is guaranteed by the Second Amendment. The instrument ("arms and equipment" must meet some part of the following criteria: 1.) Have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia (so think supplies, support gear, vehicles, etc.); 2.) Is any part of the ordinary military equipment (think about anything that an infantryman can have, specifically), or; 3.) Its use could contribute to the common defense (anything outside of the basic infantryman's loadout). The reason the Miller case was a "loss" was because Miller was using his sawed-off to commit crimes, and therefore not covered by the 2nd Amendment. That's the rub, is that he could have argued that it met the standard of being useful for the common defense or something like that (with examples) if he hadn't been using the shotgun for robbing banks, which he was caught for- but he was also dead, so there's that.
ATF has a skewed and wholly POLITICAL view and works their "rules" outside of actual LAW. The safety and benefit as well as the Constitutionality MUST support the CITIZENS NOT GOVERNMENT.
When a person or group of people actively spend millions of dollars in direct action against the people that they are supposed to work for there is a word for that.
@@masskiller9206 to conspire is when more then one person actively works together to bring about an evil plan against a victim... So yeah, that meets the criteria
Have you heard anything about a purchase order for 1.6 billion rounds of 40 cal hollow point ammo being placed recently and smg"s to fire them from🤔 The timing is very suspect I see it as a future escalation to be presented. Hollow points are not for training......
This is a shame I joined the Marine Corps at 18 years old start working as a sheriff's deputy at 22 years old and possibly made a felon at 53 years old just by owning a weapon with a damn arm brace don't you just love this country
Every min I turn around it’s good news 30 seconds later it’s bad news, it’s far to many court level 5th circuit 6,7 8, so on & so on im burnt out with all this. The brace and AR & and bump stock is over. Appreciate the info
Thank God the NY courts were able to modify a statute of limitations (for exactly 1 year ONLY) for sexual assault allegations to hold trUmp liable for battery in less than a week! At least we know -completely false and made up- cases are moving in a timely manner, IF you’re on the correct -left- team!
Well, we will not comply should have been the response from the beginning because apparently "the challenge it in court" has been a complete waste of time and money. The answer "NO" has been on the table the whole time...
They're dragging their feet to see how many owners registered. Then based off that they'll use some sort of bs argument to move their position even further.
Once chevron deference is dealt with, qualified immunity is shortly behind it. Then they will have no choice but to abide by 28USC-144, and 18USC-242 / 241.
@@kennygp2004 Correct, I’ve already made preparations for war. I have my own group of men I train with and we are prepared for their declaration at the end of the month. I guess we will all be felons together now 😂
WE THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA should unify on these matters and let their voices be heard,if people continue to come here and complain it won’t solve nothing,people need to start planning on joining together to support the 2nd amendment and hold these government agencies accountable for infringing on our constitutional rights
Laws disguised as rules are still laws if one can be prosecuted for them as a federal offense and receive prison time as the punishment. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's a friggin duck. That being said, congress needs to either put a muzzle on their loudmouth duck or put it down permanently.
Good day Counselor, Thank you for your valuable hardwork and research of the subject. We appreciate the citations and facts of the case pres6. We wish you success and the best of everything. More power to the Channel. Hope you'll consider to run for Congress. Kind regards,
Even if this goes into effect why does the grandfather clause not apply? I would think it would apply to any rule these loonatics in the atf try to put in place.
Their work around to grandfathering is "Claiming" that these "have always been controlled by the NFA" is clever bit of BS to back date their new rule to 1934, the date the NFA was passed. So if you had it before the NFA, it might be allowed... It's all very George Orwell 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' : "We've always been at war with Eurasia."
@Jason Puddy There is a law already on SBR's. The rule only sets the definition of what a brace is.. and based on the rule, the brace is a stock which makes your "pistol" an SBR.
This is literally a slam dunk if anybody even at ALL brings up Heller or Bruen. SBRs are now common use items after this rule. I don't get how they're flubbing this so badly.
A lot of these gun rights groups need these things to keep happening so they can raise more money from fleecing gun owners. More gun control can only benefit them
Lol then do felon things. It’s a free pass to not follow any of their shit. Slap a stock on it, drill the third hole, make your own cans etc it’s time for the next revolution anyway.
So if they are claiming that nothing is changing then why can't the gun stores continue to sell braced pistols without owners registering them? Obviously they have changed something.
But it wont help anyone. Lack of registration only means they will pick us apart one by one when they catch us with a braced pistol turning us into felons (so we lose everything) and there won't be anything we can do about that. Personally I'm not registering but I will remove the braces for now and wait for all this to play out in court and if I have to pay for a tax stamp later if all the lawsuits fail then so be it.
Forgive me if this sounds a bit uninformed but imo any case that has to do directly with any constitutional amendment should go directly to the Supreme Court. If it violates the constitution there is zero reason it should be allowed. Period
Many people who are not disabled own pistol braces for another reason. Due to ATF regulations pursuant to the National Firearms Act of 1934 and other gun laws, all rifles with a stock and a barrel of less than 16 inches are considered an SBR, or Short Barreled Rifle, which are heavily regulated by the ATF. Shooters who wish to legally own an SBR are required to apply for permission with fingerprints, serial number, and photos, wait an undefined amount of time for processing, and pay for a $200 tax stamp. The other option that was formerly open to gun owners was to remove the regular gun stock in favor of a pistol brace. In Nov. 2012, the ATF determined that installing a stabilizing brace on a short-barreled AR-type rifle would not change that firearm’s classification from a regular handgun to an NFA-regulated SBR. A 2014 letter issued by the ATF that says the bureau does not classify pistol braces as a stock simply because it can be shoulder-fired. “We have determined that firing a pistol from the shoulder would not cause the pistol to be reclassified as an SBR,” reads the letter. “Generally speaking, we do not classify weapons based on how an individual uses a weapon.” According to the Congressional Research Service, unofficial estimates place the number of privately-owned pistol braces at around 10 to 40 million, so common use. The CRS says that changing the classifications of these firearms would likely affect millions of Americans.
Correction: Would not change the classification of a short barreled ar "pistol".... If it started as a rifle, it is always a rifle. If it started as a pistol, it can go back and forth per US v Mossberg re shockwave 12 gauge pistol with a short barrel.
The simple fact this wasnt struck down the first 24 hrs it was brought to light shows me it WILL go through and become the "rule" of the land. Crooked as crooked gets, as organized as organized crime gets
Thank you for keeping us informed on the efforts to block the ATF's pistol brace and short-barreled rifle rule. It's concerning to see the government attempting to restrict our Second Amendment rights yet again, and it's great to see people fighting back against these overreaching regulations. We need to stand together and push back against any attempts to infringe on our right to bear arms. Keep up the good work, and I look forward to hearing more updates on this important issue.
I don’t care what they end up doing. I’m not complying with their bs. It’s an illogical thing to give the atf any ability to limit any damn thing we do, so I’m done listening to them.
I’m so sick of the hypocrisy and the tyranny. Just leave us the fuck alone. We aren’t hurting anyone and just want to defend our families from those who intend to do harm. And those criminals are constantly being let out of prison after committing numerous violent felonies
You know what’s mind blowing? It’s like the ATF said to themselves, “OK. What’s the purpose of a pistol brace?”. Then someone in the room says, “to simplify it down to the nuts and bolts, it makes the gun more accurate.” Then the person who asked the initial question said, “MORE ACCURATE?! You mean there’s less of a chance that people will get shot at random because someone couldn’t hit the initial target?! NO! NO NO NO NO NOOOO!, these gun nuts NEED to ‘spray and pray’ so that we can hold them accountable when they hit a bystander!”
I love my AR pistols but ATF couldn’t pay me enough to put my guns on their SBR lists. Hopefully with my A5 buffers and brakes I’ll be able to run them well enough without braces. My concession to the brace rule is to make my pistols as useful/functional as possible without braces.
"she shouldnt have worn that skirt and she wouldnt have gotten raped.." same fckd up logic it was LEGAL for them to SHOULDER a braced weapon for OCCASIONAL USAGE it was IN their (ATFs) clarifications of the ACCEPTANCE LETTER do try and keep up with whats actually going on before you get indignant about something im willing to bet doesnt actually affect you
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 64 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "พาร์แฮม vs จอร์แดน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yg2mS5U2aB8/mqdefault.jpg)
🇺🇸 Support the Channel🇺🇸
Kershaw: Use code 23Scholar20 for 20% off
Join USCCA usccapartners.com/armedscholar
BlackoutCoffee: www.blackoutcoffee.com/armedscholar
Code: "ArmedScholar" for 10% Off
no compliance is the only route...you nerdy lawyers and bootlickers got us here in the first place
KERSHAW are a respectable name, but they tend to omit saying MANY OF THEIR KNIVES ARE MADE IN CHINA. The expensive ones are more likely to be made in USA.
Whats your thoughts on Nebraska signing LB77, a bill that basically allows the ability to permitless concealed carry of a firearm?
23Scholar20 The coupon code isn't valid. Verify the code and try again.
hey dont forget our elections werent real
Approved by the ATF For the past 10 years and now suddenly it's dangerous. But if you pay them $200 it's no longer dangerous. Oh ok.
i.e. extortion
It's not about the $200, it's about the list your name goes on. The AFT knows a braced gun isn't any more dangerous than a regular rifle; this is just the serpent's path to a "legal" registry. The only reason SBRs are in the NFA in the first place is because the OG gun grabbers couldn't persuade the courts to allow them to restrict handguns, and they thought this would provide them with leverage against our rights in the future.
@@_spacegoat_ uh....yeah obviously. That's what the original commenter is saying....can't read between the lines?
@@CVMN-kf2qc Sorry, I must have missed where the OP talked about the reason SBRs were added to the NFA instead of handguns. You know, how it was because handguns were forbidden from being restricted in the NFA by the courts? Can you point it out to me? Since you seem to have some kind of impairment going on, I'll save you the trouble: No, you can't, because the OP didn't mention it, _nor was it implied._
It's called "adding to the conversation" and it's what grownups do when they talk. You should try it some time.
@@_spacegoat_ bingo - folks will think it’s a money grab instead of trying to infringe on rights.
If there are millions of these (soon to be) SBR’s in law abiding hands doesn’t that mean SBR’s are in common use?
Always have been, just like suppressors
Actually the govmints own polls stats show that all arms ( even machine guns ) ARE IN COMMON USE. SEE GUNS AND GADGETS 👀.
How many lives have been lost UNCONSTITUTIONALLY To home invasions DUE TO THE ENACTMENT AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE NFA and the GCA aka 1934 INFRINGEMENT and THE 1968 INFRINGEMENT 🙀😿👀😿😿😿😿😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
Yeah, see, they like to change the meanings of words when it suits their agenda (or else just ignore the meaning altogether). For reference, just compare the pre- and post-covid definitions of the word "vaccine."
Yes
When's the last time common use was ruled in a 2a case thoo
I didn't come up with this, but I love the message: If the 1st Amendment applies to radio, tv, and the internet, and the 4th amendment covers electronic wiretapping and video surveillance, how can the 2nd amendment only apply to 18th-century firearms technology?
Caetano and Staples.....
Hit your local fed with the Puckle gun and see how much they like 18th century firearms tech now.
The square bullets for Turks.
I love this, first time hearing this. Thanks!
Great point
Damn fine point. Damn fine.
If you've watched all the videos of Congress grilling the ATF director and many others it's insane how this is even getting to this point it shouldn't even pass or even affect anyone according to what members of Congress say and ask
Lets not forget to mention atf does not nor has the ability to make law. And rules are blatant dosregard to their authority
Agreed
Do you notice how the government is trying to produce lawful theater for an illegal rule making by an administrative agency?, If they broke the law by making rules why can't the states just do the same thing and have their sheriff's go to town on the Feds when they cross into their county?
First off, the conservatives in Congress are a joke & second We The People should no way comply with these tyrants💯FACTS TRUTH Baby
People that don't know about something( firearms) should not have any say so about anything to do with firearms..kinda lika a bartender being a congress lady.telling people how to live..😮
At what point do we address the actual problem of the unelected, unaccountable, politically motivated permanent administrative class, becoming a self feeding entity, and controlling interest in our Government?
what do you mean? that was the entire point of the system, by design... why do you think the electoral college was even conceptually put in place from the start?
@@masskiller9206 What the hell are you talking about? The Electoral College has nothing to do with unelected bureaucrats.
@@masskiller9206 That was most certainly not the point of the system at all. The electoral college has nothing to do with anything he said. (Also, the electoral college was put in place to give smaller states a better chance at fighting against larger states in elections and is one of the main things that ensures we stay free.)
Are you referring to appointed judges and other administrators?
@@masskiller9206 That isn't correct. The electoral college was to be made of Congress selected, by congress to elect their executive officers. The Civil Service, which is the army of unelected, unaccountable, permanent staff, I am referring to, was never intended to exist. In fact, a majority of the founders expressly warned of that very system as the core reason for the corruption of other forms of Governance. That system was put in place after the Civil War to make the US government function more like the Corporate Empire system we broke away from in the first place, and then re-affirmed after WW2 along with the standing military, because the threat of Nuclear war brought real risk to the "Sophisticated" among us who had been able to remove themselves from the dirty realities of actual conflict before that. They are also the ones who codified the "continuity of government" nonsense that has led to the American war machine and the "Democracy"" we are being told has always existed at the expense of continuity of the Liberty of Citizens.
The election of Senators, and the President/VP, was never meant to be done by popular vote or direct democracy. The idea being that the average citizen is either too busy with local/State affairs or too far removed from the National Issues to be burdened with that responsibility. They were meant to focus on creating stable local/State communities, and making certain they elected the wisest and most capable among them to represent them at the National level, which is also why the Federal Government has such strict restrictions placed on their scope.
Modern Americans have a completely different understanding of our system than was intended, by design. The Republic has been usurped in favor of two competing ideas of elitists, neither a "Democracy" or an Empire were ever to exist on the N. American Continent. It was always intended that the Aggregate of Citizens who were invested enough in the long term health of the total Republic to risk their time, talents & treasure, to make sure it functioned, were to be the authority and structure.
Judges should be held personally and physically accountable for their unconstitutional decisions.
Once chevron deference is dealt with, qualified immunity is shortly behind it. Then they will have no choice but to abide by 28USC-144, and 18USC-242 / 241.
when you think back on history, remember that only 250 years ago people were willing to fight the british & die just because their taxes were a little too high. compare with today, where people were locked indoors for a year+, businesses and careers ruined unless you bent the knee and risked your life for pfizer profits, and you see how weak and spineless the modern american has become. overweight, low testosterone, only willing to talk but never really putting any substance behind their actions. its a sad reality but you have to realize that when an idea has nobody willing to stand for it, that idea is dead. the pistol brace is just a minor wart on the festering tumor that is the weak & insane modern western society
only 2 things you can do, keep talking or make a plan to get you and your family out of here as it only gets worse
You should really stop assuming that this country is governed by the Constitution. How much more evidence do you need that it isn't?
the people don't have the balls for that anymore
it's gotta get worse before it can get better
@@pacman10182 I would have agreed with your comment, but I'm afraid I would hear a knock at my door :)
Any officer that enforces any of this stands in perjury of their oath and their uniform. Just sayin.
Only oath they obey, is to protect hand that feeds.
I think the term is ‘foreswearing his oath”.
My sheriff has said he would arrest any police officers who try to arrest for ATF rules.
@@animalmother9945 That's freaking awesome. We love our local Sheriff Dept., too. Great professional deputies that keep the riffraff out.
@@zelenizub2036 they maybe defending their family’s with all the illegals coming to a town near you lol
I just want them to lose their ability to blackmail our rights away every time or something or gaslight people into thinking they've made laws when it's rules which is basically wanting us to follow it willingly even though it's not a law 😞
Too many compliant law abiders. It’s amazing how free you get when you just stop being a law abider.
@Michael Well as of this past Monday. I watch a different channel. He the man who runs that channel. He decided to just put 1 "form 1" and UNDER 200K "Form 1's" have even been submitted. So I would like them see to try and "enforce " this bs!!..ATF better work non stop to go after them 38.8 MILLION law abiding citizens!!
@Michael let's be real about it for a second...there are no law abiders out there, just *perceived* law abiders. If you've ever jaywalked, rolled a stop sign, gone 5mph over the speed limit, etc. you've broken the law. Gonna be hard-pressed to find anyone out there that's never broke one of those laws. This rule is about the equivalent of any trivial stuff like that. It's gonna get little to no compiance, all the way up until the SC does away with this nonsense
Just don’t follow it. Bring them to court. First off, it's not a Law it's a rule and they have no jurisdiction to make laws. Second, it's unconstitutional.
@@Mitch_Conner75926 theyre the ones not abiding by the law of the land! We The People enforce the constitution through our actions and beliefs.
*"The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants." -- Albert Camus*
"Don't piss down my back and tell me it's rainin'" -- Someone, probably
What's sad is, I have a friend that literally has no use of one of his arms. He has to put it in his pocket with his good hand. He NEEDS this brace because of his disability. This isn't because they are just "Cool." They will do anything to go against our rights.
“One person shits their pants and then everyone has to eat a diaper.” Us government in a nutshell.
I’ve always wondered, how does someone like your friend attach the brace to their wrist with only one arm?
Of course that's why they call it communism...
@@VictorSanchez-fi9lf This is actually a really good point
@@VictorSanchez-fi9lf Some people have friends. Also, I could easily remove or install a brace with one hand using my Tipton gun vise. Which I could also set up with one hand. Fortunately I have full use of both hands. But I have a friend who crashed a motorcycle and would need a brace.
Have any ATF members sworn an oath to uphold and defend the constitution of the USA? Then why are we following any of their "laws"?
I still think it’s funny anyone follows that shit.
They need a paycheck and most of them don’t want to go after law abiding citizens.
@@Gadsdenflag “Just following orders” has legitimately killed millions of people
Because we're all pussies.
It isn't a law.
Chevron was already removed by the SCOTUS EPA ruling that stated their “rules,” were an overstep and Lenity must be applied.
What's also crazy is how can any judge not see that just as a bump stock doesn't magically make a machine gun a brace doesn't make an SBR anymore then a foam pad does.
They are paid off and part of the system. This should not be a surprise.
SBRs being regulated in the first place is stupid as hell.
They're bought and paid for. That's why.
@@1stCallipostle just another reason to look at the Silent Generation with scorn and derision
They "see it"... they're fulfilling an agenda. Remember the small arms treaty...
Those who rushed and sent in their application to get that free tax stamp will be the first to be visited by the alphabet bois. They can't process all the stamps that would be applied for and therefore will be denied. And....now you've told them you have the pistol and brace...told them who and where you are. Simplified their leg work.
Then they knock on your door lol so true
Bully anyone with an SBR tax stamp
No exceptions whatsoever
Hit the nail on the head.
Dettlebach testified the ATF will not prosecute individuals if the pistol and the brace are separated! Don't register your firearm!
Although I agree with you to not register a damn thing, what that POS Dettlebach said was yesterday’s news. As the ATF has demonstrated time and time again, Dettlebach and the Gestapo at the ATF can change their mind every time the wind changes direction.
I totally trust everything that Dettlebach says. The ATF never lies or changes their mind 😂
@@leatherhead9588 so in that case, just don't comply lol.
@@leatherhead9588 thank you! Beat me to it!
They changed their mind about everything else! They prosecute for unassembled parts all the time...
They have prosecuted for having an unassembled stock "near" an AR pistol.
He was a federal prosecutor.
He is not telling the truth and he knows it.
ATF forgot they can’t make laws….an there hasn’t been no law passed saying that a pistol brace on your rifle turns it into an SBR
Pistol. The pistol brace does not turn your pistol into an SBR.
@@matt1635 yep..till that to the ATF
As should be A shock to nobody the courts WILL NOT give relief in time.
Yup so start doing felon shit, it’s quite liberating when you realize that criminals founded the nation and free men are the criminals who don’t abide by unconstitutional shit.
Piss on the courts mass non compliance with blood letting is what will be required comply with nothing
It does not seem like owners of legally purchased and responsibly kept pistols with attached stabilizing braces are going to get relief before the ATF’s spectacularly gracious 120 days runs out. It really sucks the wind out of the law abiding, safe, moral, and prudent gun owner’s sails.
It really does suck. I just bought my first firearm. I got myself a nice .300 blackout pistol and I can't even put it all together 😢
Just be a moral free citizen...it's a duty to ignore unconstitutional laws/rules
@@Raymo2u that's really the way we will have to overcome this. Clearly the courts have no interest in actually following the law either, so the only way will be mass non-compliance. Now that's easy for me to say given I don't have an ar pistol, but truly I would hope everyone wouldn't comply with this extortion.
This guy just learning because it's law doesn't make it correct.
Laws can get changed overnight 😂
You mean, it makes impossible to continue believing that this non-elected beuracacracy is really the benevolent child saving criminal targeting fairy tale they claim to be?
Yes, yes it does.
IF per the ATF there are 7 million pistols with braces in the USA, and they are all SBRs....doesn' that mean there are over 7 million SBRs in the USA thus common use applies and they can't ban, tax or otherwise regulate them....
At this point the judges in these lawsuits should be considered complacent in violating the constitution and removed.
i love how they try to say SBRs are more dangerous than normal rifles but infact SBRs are less powerful due to incomplete powder burn and gas expansion.
"BuT y0u CaИ hIdE tHeM sO mUcH eAsIeЯ!!"
only one would burn the powder are .300 blackouts otherwise your right
Good grief tell me you don’t know what time it is without telling me. Just a completely irrelevant point. Spending waaaay too much time pointing out the flaws in their arguments. Meanwhile they laugh at you and steamroll you. They don’t argue, they’re playing to win. The gestapo labeled you enemy #1. He doesn’t give two craps about powder burns and dwell times. Knock it off with this garbage
Be prepared for some people to be made an example of.
Crime is on the rise.
Form neighborhood watch organizations.
Be prepared to protect yourself from home invading ceiminals.
Why isn’t anyone using the Bruen and Heller decisions to go after the Short Barrel Rifle prohibition of the NFA??? The ATF is saying, in the pistol brace rule, that the presence of a pistol brace turns an AR pistol into an SBR. OK, then let ATF have that opinion, but then the 800-lb gorilla enters the room…..Where is the historical analog from the era of the adoption of the 2nd A that shows government is permitted to legislate the length of a rifle barrel? Think about it. MILLIONS of AR pistols with braces were purchased LEGALLY, and are now commonly owned for lawful purposes.
if you care..
the SBR rule was created because MOST big cities even in the 1800s had a no concealed handguns rule
and handguns were often not even sold in the city
so criminals ( like now) just went around the law bought hunting rifles and shotguns and chopped them down to fit under coats and jackets and in small containers.
I AM NOT A SUPPORTER OF THIS LAW
it no longer applies in its intent
i just thought youd like to know why it was created other than ( the govt) just being a dick to everyone
U.S. v. Jack Miller is fitting as well, when you consider the rubric given for what is "guaranteed under the 2nd Amendment" as made in the ruling.
That was a logically flawed ruling and could use an update with real teeth for the Second Ammendment.
US V Miller was 1934 or 35 and basically was scotus good old boy nod that "sure you restrict a protected right if it's for safety...." it should not stand.
1939, actually, but oh well. The NFA was written in 1934.
Miller has teeth to it, but no one uses it properly- it specifically lays out a rubric of what (at a minimum) is guaranteed by the Second Amendment. The instrument ("arms and equipment" must meet some part of the following criteria:
1.) Have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia (so think supplies, support gear, vehicles, etc.);
2.) Is any part of the ordinary military equipment (think about anything that an infantryman can have, specifically), or;
3.) Its use could contribute to the common defense (anything outside of the basic infantryman's loadout).
The reason the Miller case was a "loss" was because Miller was using his sawed-off to commit crimes, and therefore not covered by the 2nd Amendment. That's the rub, is that he could have argued that it met the standard of being useful for the common defense or something like that (with examples) if he hadn't been using the shotgun for robbing banks, which he was caught for- but he was also dead, so there's that.
What judge would not consider that AFT already accepted braces as an accessory intended to be fired from the hand and not the shoulder?
Supreme Court what are you waiting for?
ATF has a skewed and wholly POLITICAL view and works their "rules" outside of actual LAW. The safety and benefit as well as the Constitutionality MUST support the CITIZENS NOT GOVERNMENT.
When a person or group of people actively spend millions of dollars in direct action against the people that they are supposed to work for there is a word for that.
Tyrants
conspiracy?
@@masskiller9206 to conspire is when more then one person actively works together to bring about an evil plan against a victim...
So yeah, that meets the criteria
Treasonous
This truly sucks for all of us
I just don't see after the EPA case how ATF is still able to make law
Have you heard anything about a purchase order for 1.6 billion rounds of 40 cal hollow point ammo being placed recently and smg"s to fire them from🤔
The timing is very suspect I see it as a future escalation to be presented.
Hollow points are not for training......
Gonna be hogs in Michigan again
For federal law enforcement, you train with duty ammo.
@@GrayHairis_Distinguishedto be fair, if at all possible, training should be done with duty ammo regardless.
I remember people bringing this up in the in the George Bush days.
I just bought 1000 rounds of 40 HP it was $1 cheaper a vox than fmj. You just have to look for the sales.
I’ll never understand how the ATF brace rule doesn’t violate the ADA.
The ADA doesn't apply to firearm ownership.
Lou Costello and Moe Howard are hauling the load of Fuel for Al Gore's Rhythm Jet. What could go wrong?
⛽⛽
LOL
This is a shame I joined the Marine Corps at 18 years old start working as a sheriff's deputy at 22 years old and possibly made a felon at 53 years old just by owning a weapon with a damn arm brace don't you just love this country
You get a Felony Rap!...And you get a Felony Rap!...EVERYBODY gets a Felony Rap!!!
🤬☠️🤬
Anthony keeping us up to date on these cases. As usual, we appreciate your hard work!
Every min I turn around it’s good news 30 seconds later it’s bad news, it’s far to many court level 5th circuit 6,7 8, so on & so on im burnt out with all this. The brace and AR & and bump stock is over. Appreciate the info
These cases appear to be moving at a snails pace for sure.
Chief Justice Roberts is dragging his feet.
Thank God the NY courts were able to modify a statute of limitations (for exactly 1 year ONLY) for sexual assault allegations to hold trUmp liable for battery in less than a week! At least we know -completely false and made up- cases are moving in a timely manner, IF you’re on the correct -left- team!
Thanks for all the updates you do man much appreciated
Thank you once again for this update and your insightful perspectives. Much appreciated.
Well, we will not comply should have been the response from the beginning because apparently "the challenge it in court" has been a complete waste of time and money. The answer "NO" has been on the table the whole time...
It doesn’t follow, the law, history, tradition, nor the 2A.
None of these courts have stepped up!
They're dragging their feet to see how many owners registered. Then based off that they'll use some sort of bs argument to move their position even further.
Thanks for the update and commentary. We really appreciate it.
Once chevron deference is dealt with, qualified immunity is shortly behind it. Then they will have no choice but to abide by 28USC-144, and 18USC-242 / 241.
This will be a sad time for our whole country!
We deserve everything we allow.
@@kennygp2004 Correct, I’ve already made preparations for war. I have my own group of men I train with and we are prepared for their declaration at the end of the month. I guess we will all be felons together now 😂
WE THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA should unify on these matters and let their voices be heard,if people continue to come here and complain it won’t solve nothing,people need to start planning on joining together to support the 2nd amendment and hold these government agencies accountable for infringing on our constitutional rights
@@Mitch_Conner75926awesome job announcing that on TH-cam. You know this place is crawling with feds right?
Laws disguised as rules are still laws if one can be prosecuted for them as a federal offense and receive prison time as the punishment. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's a friggin duck. That being said, congress needs to either put a muzzle on their loudmouth duck or put it down permanently.
Good day Counselor,
Thank you for your valuable hardwork and research of the subject.
We appreciate the citations and facts of the case pres6.
We wish you success and the best of everything.
More power to the Channel.
Hope you'll consider to run for Congress.
Kind regards,
Another ATF unconstitutional flip flop...rule of lenity applies, given the ambiguity within these rules
Even if this goes into effect why does the grandfather clause not apply? I would think it would apply to any rule these loonatics in the atf try to put in place.
There isn't a grandfather clause in the new rule.
It’s back door forced gun confiscation. Then they’ll hash it out in court for decades of back and forth appeals till you’re long dead
Their work around to grandfathering is "Claiming" that these "have always been controlled by the NFA" is clever bit of BS to back date their new rule to 1934, the date the NFA was passed.
So if you had it before the NFA, it might be allowed...
It's all very George Orwell 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' : "We've always been at war with Eurasia."
@Jason Puddy There is a law already on SBR's. The rule only sets the definition of what a brace is.. and based on the rule, the brace is a stock which makes your "pistol" an SBR.
@Jason Puddy I wholeheartedly agree with you on that.
Thanks for the candid assessment.
Great channel, thanks for all the updates.👍🏻🇺🇲
Thank you sir- keep those updates coming!
PS love my Kershaw
Great update. Thank you
Thank you for the information.
DO NOT comply and DO NOT apply for the stamp.
This is literally a slam dunk if anybody even at ALL brings up Heller or Bruen. SBRs are now common use items after this rule.
I don't get how they're flubbing this so badly.
idk. maybe they dont want to actually stop it. part of me wouldnt be surprised.
@@TheJomoe1 it surely seems like it.
And somehow is never going to happen.
A lot of these gun rights groups need these things to keep happening so they can raise more money from fleecing gun owners. More gun control can only benefit them
Everything is part of the plan to control us! And that’s from both sides of the aisle. There are no good guys in government… they aren’t on our side.
Looks like I’ll be a felon oh well
Only pays off if you're black.
Lol then do felon things. It’s a free pass to not follow any of their shit. Slap a stock on it, drill the third hole, make your own cans etc it’s time for the next revolution anyway.
On behalf of all of us I thank you for your efforts to keep us all well informed.
So if they are claiming that nothing is changing then why can't the gun stores continue to sell braced pistols without owners registering them? Obviously they have changed something.
They sure want those camps badly.
Thanks for the update. 😁
I can’t wait to see the lack of registrations lol it’s gonna be embarrassing 😂
But it wont help anyone. Lack of registration only means they will pick us apart one by one when they catch us with a braced pistol turning us into felons (so we lose everything) and there won't be anything we can do about that. Personally I'm not registering but I will remove the braces for now and wait for all this to play out in court and if I have to pay for a tax stamp later if all the lawsuits fail then so be it.
It's all sickening and pathetic
Forgive me if this sounds a bit uninformed but imo any case that has to do directly with any constitutional amendment should go directly to the Supreme Court. If it violates the constitution there is zero reason it should be allowed. Period
Appreciate the clue. Algorithmic inputs count!
Great Report. Thank You. AS
How are they changing what is a pistol on the transfer form to a rifle? It’s got a pistol brace. A PISTOL brace… WTF.
Problem here is that they approved it and said it was ok. Where was their clarification decades ago?
Many people who are not disabled own pistol braces for another reason. Due to ATF regulations pursuant to the National Firearms Act of 1934 and other gun laws, all rifles with a stock and a barrel of less than 16 inches are considered an SBR, or Short Barreled Rifle, which are heavily regulated by the ATF. Shooters who wish to legally own an SBR are required to apply for permission with fingerprints, serial number, and photos, wait an undefined amount of time for processing, and pay for a $200 tax stamp. The other option that was formerly open to gun owners was to remove the regular gun stock in favor of a pistol brace.
In Nov. 2012, the ATF determined that installing a stabilizing brace on a short-barreled AR-type rifle would not change that firearm’s classification from a regular handgun to an NFA-regulated SBR.
A 2014 letter issued by the ATF that says the bureau does not classify pistol braces as a stock simply because it can be shoulder-fired.
“We have determined that firing a pistol from the shoulder would not cause the pistol to be reclassified as an SBR,” reads the letter. “Generally speaking, we do not classify weapons based on how an individual uses a weapon.”
According to the Congressional Research Service, unofficial estimates place the number of privately-owned pistol braces at around 10 to 40 million, so common use. The CRS says that changing the classifications of these firearms would likely affect millions of Americans.
Correction:
Would not change the classification of a short barreled ar "pistol"....
If it started as a rifle, it is always a rifle.
If it started as a pistol, it can go back and forth per US v Mossberg re shockwave 12 gauge pistol with a short barrel.
Texans, y'all make sure you've got that judge's name come elections & such.
Why do we keep allowing government entities to use our tax money against us in all of these lawsuits??????
They need to read the 2nd amendment again
Thanks Anthony
🇺🇸👍
The M4 shows that SBRs have a place in military use and should no longer be restricted.
Thank you.
Thank you A!
I too carry a Kershaw for every day.
Howdy All !
Howdy uncle mike!
The simple fact this wasnt struck down the first 24 hrs it was brought to light shows me it WILL go through and become the "rule" of the land. Crooked as crooked gets, as organized as organized crime gets
Thank you for keeping us informed on the efforts to block the ATF's pistol brace and short-barreled rifle rule. It's concerning to see the government attempting to restrict our Second Amendment rights yet again, and it's great to see people fighting back against these overreaching regulations. We need to stand together and push back against any attempts to infringe on our right to bear arms. Keep up the good work, and I look forward to hearing more updates on this important issue.
Thank you
I don’t care what they end up doing. I’m not complying with their bs. It’s an illogical thing to give the atf any ability to limit any damn thing we do, so I’m done listening to them.
Amnesty ? Compliance ? HAAHAAHAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAH . 40 million ?
Thank you Sir
I’m so sick of the hypocrisy and the tyranny. Just leave us the fuck alone. We aren’t hurting anyone and just want to defend our families from those who intend to do harm. And those criminals are constantly being let out of prison after committing numerous violent felonies
The SCOTUS needs to put the ATFE in their place and tell them to knock it off or disband them entirely.
You know what’s mind blowing? It’s like the ATF said to themselves, “OK. What’s the purpose of a pistol brace?”. Then someone in the room says, “to simplify it down to the nuts and bolts, it makes the gun more accurate.” Then the person who asked the initial question said, “MORE ACCURATE?! You mean there’s less of a chance that people will get shot at random because someone couldn’t hit the initial target?! NO! NO NO NO NO NOOOO!, these gun nuts NEED to ‘spray and pray’ so that we can hold them accountable when they hit a bystander!”
Why hasn't there been an application for emergency stay submitted tot he Supreme Court?
Love my Kershaw Cryo! I use this knife in my EDC and use it almost every day!
The notification came very late for your evening video but I got here as soon as I seen it. 🚀⛽️🇺🇸
I love my AR pistols but ATF couldn’t pay me enough to put my guns on their SBR lists. Hopefully with my A5 buffers and brakes I’ll be able to run them well enough without braces. My concession to the brace rule is to make my pistols as useful/functional as possible without braces.
Good info!
thank you!
How does a brace change the design? An AR is designed to have a buffer tube , which in turn is designed and built to accept a brace?
Removing my braces and moving them to another house I own or storage forty miles away.
YOU took an oath against all enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC
Thank all your favorite gun tubers for only shouldering their pistols on camera for likes and subs for bringing all this brace attention
"she shouldnt have worn that skirt and she wouldnt have gotten raped.."
same fckd up logic
it was LEGAL for them to SHOULDER a braced weapon for OCCASIONAL USAGE
it was IN their (ATFs) clarifications of the ACCEPTANCE LETTER
do try and keep up with whats actually going on before you get indignant about something im willing to bet doesnt actually affect you
😎Thanks Anthony!
Nice info thanks