Session 9 (Val MBA): FCFE and Growth Rates

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 6

  • @sirzatyenen3200
    @sirzatyenen3200 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is how the CFA should be taught, excellent transition from FCFE and levered betas to Modigliani-Miller, thank you so much for the series, Professor.

  • @subhamchowdhury6296
    @subhamchowdhury6296 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the justification for using a levered beta instead of a regression was mind blowing sir. thank you so much for valuable lecture

  • @booksgeek8649
    @booksgeek8649 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hello sir, thank you.
    Please I have a question, for bank valuation, we use cost of equity instead of WACC, but if we want to valuate a subsidiary operating in another country we should add another layer of risk, shall we add the differential of cds or inflation ( between two countries parent and subsidiaries) to the basic cost of equity or should we use another thing . Thank you in advance

    • @Ihgn8052
      @Ihgn8052 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi, just a guess, but I think if you do the valuation in the same currency for both then inflation should not affect anything, because inflation is currency-specific:) The country risk premium should be the only punishment for operating in that country. Correct me if I'm wrong.

  • @akshatsharma..
    @akshatsharma.. 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i have a question for anyone who could help
    what is the difference between the MBA valuation and undergrad valuation ??

    • @SushilKumar-dr9rj
      @SushilKumar-dr9rj 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I haven't watched the undergrad version. But Prof Damodaran mentioned once that there isn't much difference. Pick any one and stick with it.