Hello Dr Haynes, I have a question. I was checking literature and I noticed they introduced the total number of surface sites in the equation: I wonder why you didn´t and if that implies something else in the analysis. Many thanks.
We don't need the total number of sites to derive the equation. However, it is useful for relating the space each adsorbate molecule takes up on the surface to the total active surface area. This calculation is included in the next video in the playlist: th-cam.com/video/03gSeRKOAns/w-d-xo.html
Hi! Good video, thank you for that! I got a question though, why is the adsorption rate = k[A](1-Theta) and not k[A](Theta), 1-Theta would be free binding sites right?
Hello Dr Haynes,
I have a question. I was checking literature and I noticed they introduced the total number of surface sites in the equation: I wonder why you didn´t and if that implies something else in the analysis.
Many thanks.
We don't need the total number of sites to derive the equation. However, it is useful for relating the space each adsorbate molecule takes up on the surface to the total active surface area. This calculation is included in the next video in the playlist: th-cam.com/video/03gSeRKOAns/w-d-xo.html
Oh I see,
Thanks a million!
but the A concentration what is it? the adsobent or the adsorbate ?'
sorry it the adsorbate the articule or compion that adsorps but We already know it is the equation of Langmuir.... cool
Hi! Good video, thank you for that! I got a question though, why is the adsorption rate = k[A](1-Theta) and not k[A](Theta), 1-Theta would be free binding sites right?
I need tutorial about multi component isotherm models
This was really helpful. Thanx !
Thank u. It helps me a lot !
def a x2 speed video...