Impress your Math Teacher! Solve by Completing The Square

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 เม.ย. 2023
  • How to solve a quadratic equation by completing the square - step by step example.
    For more in-depth math help check out my catalog of courses. Every course includes over 275 videos of easy to follow and understand math instruction, with fully explained practice problems and printable worksheets, review notes and quizzes. All courses developed and taught by me (experienced and certified math teacher 🤩).
    With my courses you CAN reach your math goal! 💪
    All Courses - TCMathAcademy.com/
    ✓Help with Middle and High School Math (Public/Private Schools)
    ✓High School & College Math Test Prep
    ✓Teacher Certification Math Test Prep
    ✓Homeschool Math Program and Courses for Pre-Algebra, Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2 and Pre-Calculus.
    TC Math Notes
    Pre-Algebra Notes: tabletclass-math.creator-spri...
    Algebra Notes: tabletclass-math.creator-spri...
    Geometry Notes: tabletclass-math.creator-spri...
    Algebra 2 / Trig Notes: tabletclass-math.creator-spri...

ความคิดเห็น • 45

  • @larrywiener6327
    @larrywiener6327 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If I were to have to solve this equation I probably use the formula, but this is a good exercise in completing the square hand and understanding algebraic operations

  • @Tkkj73
    @Tkkj73 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your in depth analysis of how to solve quadratic equation using completing the square methods.

  • @arkan7rb
    @arkan7rb 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    THANK YOU in all languages of the world
    greetings from Yemen

  • @Eduardo-tq5sk
    @Eduardo-tq5sk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you!❤😂

  • @danieldennis9831
    @danieldennis9831 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My answer I got from completing the square was ⇒x=(-5±√33)/4
    I admit that completing the square is my weakest skill in dealing with quadratic equation solving.
    My first step was dividing the equation by 2 to make the A coefficient 1 (ax²+bx+c=0). Then move the constant to the other side.
    x²+5/2x=1/2 Let's make it 10/4 as the B coefficient and make it 16ths on the other side and then add 25/16 to both sides (perfect square).
    x²+10/4x+25/16=8/16+25/16 factor the left and simplify the right
    (x+5/4)²=33/16 find square root of each side (remembering it is ± on the right)
    x+5/4=±√33/4. move the 5/4 to the other side and simplify
    x=(-5±√33)/4
    Let's try the quadratic formula to check this.
    x=(-b±√b²-4ac)/2
    x=-5±√(25-4(2)(-1)/2(2)
    x=(-5±√33)/4
    This checks. So that is the answer.
    But this took me forever -- I would have preferred the quadratic formula as this would have been much faster.

  • @tomtke7351
    @tomtke7351 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ever since learning the quadratic equation I forgot other methods!
    so I searched internet and relearned completing the square.
    2X^2 + 5X - 1 = 0
    2X^2 + 5X = 1
    X^2 + (5/2)X = 1/2
    X^2 + (5/2)X + (25/16) = (1/2) + (25/16)
    (X + (5/4))^2 = ((8/16) + (25/16))
    (X + (5/4)) = sqrt(33/16)
    (X + 5/4) = +/- (1/4)(sqrt(33))
    X = -(5/4) +/-(1/4)(sqrt(33))
    = (1/4)(-5 +/-(sqrt(33))
    = -(5/4) +/- sqrt (33/16)
    VERIFY
    I'll use the quadratic equation...
    i.e. ( -b +/- sqrt (b^2 -4ac))/2a
    a = 2
    b = 5
    c = -1
    so....
    (-5 +/- sqrt (5^2 -(4)(2)(-1))/ (2)(2)
    (-5 +/- sqrt (25 + 8))/4
    (-5 +/- sqrt (33))/4
    (-5/4 +/- sqrt (33/16) ✔️✔️✔️
    or -5/4 = -1.25
    sqrt(33/16) = sqrt(2.062) = 1.436
    -1.25 +/- 1.436
    -1.25 + 1.436 = 0.186 root1
    -1.25 - 1.436 = -2.686 root2
    VERIFY
    2X^2 + 5X - 1 = 0
    root.1 X = 0.186
    (2)(0.186)^2 + (5)(0.186) - 1 =? 0
    0.069 + 0.93 - 1 ?= 0
    0.999 - 1 ?= 0 ✔️✔️✔️
    root.2 X = -2.686
    2X^2 + 5X - 1 = 0
    (2)(-2.686)^2 + (5)(-2.686) - 1 ?= 0
    14.429 - 13.43 - 1 ?= 0
    0.999 - 1 ?= 0 ✔️✔️✔️

  • @elliotlambert3817
    @elliotlambert3817 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When you remove the square root of 33 over 4 why does the 4 not also become + and - too.

  • @user-dn5bi4si5w
    @user-dn5bi4si5w 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You turned the left side of the equation into a perfect trinomial square. That's how it's done.👍

  • @nintendogamer331
    @nintendogamer331 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Really helpful video! But the long intro was dragging on and on unnecesarily ;P

  • @JohnnyGuitar1
    @JohnnyGuitar1 ปีที่แล้ว

    What an incredibly good teacher!!
    Thank you so much John.

  • @thatomofolo452
    @thatomofolo452 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The perfect √square root is 4

  • @benquinneyiii7941
    @benquinneyiii7941 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Density

  • @afre3398
    @afre3398 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What you did here, is it actually to create the proof of the quadratic formula??

    • @arkan7rb
      @arkan7rb 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      in the end its the quadratic formula ! just long way

  • @WombatMan64
    @WombatMan64 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Technically the x² part doesn't need to be 1, any square number will do. I found the numbers much easier to deal with by doubling the original equation (2x² + 5x - 1 = 0) to get (4x² + 10x - 2 = 0) and proceeding the rest the same way. Meant I was dealing with numbers over 4 instead of numbers over 16.

    • @andrewm6424
      @andrewm6424 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But that’s not the completing the square method.

    • @andrewm6424
      @andrewm6424 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also, you got a different equation. (2x^2 + 5X - 1 = 0) times 2 equals 4 X ^4 + 10X - 2 = 0. Now you have a quart Uc equation, instead of a quadratic equation.

    • @WombatMan64
      @WombatMan64 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@andrewm6424 why does it become X to the power of 4? I just multiplied by two, and then completed the square.

    • @glennwright9747
      @glennwright9747 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@andrewm6424you don’t double the power, so you have an error.

  • @benquinneyiii7941
    @benquinneyiii7941 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Logical

  • @rodfulford4306
    @rodfulford4306 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lost me when he divided by 2!

  • @dahcargo
    @dahcargo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the first time that the answer makes no sense regarding how it was arrived at by the teacher. The rule is that whatever you do to one side of the equation, you must do to the other. I have know idea how the 5/2X is converted to 5/4 by in essence,3 removing the X and multiplying by 2? That is a violation of basic math, the variable must be accounted for, yet in his explanation it is nonexistent. I got the first part easily: X squared + 5/2X = 1/2, but it goes into nonsense for me. I might need to "brush" up on basic algebra, but I'm a College graduate with a Degree in Biochemistry and Biology w/ emphasis on Integral Calculus. Please help, where have I gone wrong? Granted, I'm 67 and graduated in 1980. but still, this hurts!!

  • @Eduardo-tq5sk
    @Eduardo-tq5sk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When its has lot of ,exponents ,roots in denominator,power : people has to know the properties 😅.

  • @user-ec9ut2qr2s
    @user-ec9ut2qr2s 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Insoluble.

  • @user-wo3rq9zx2w
    @user-wo3rq9zx2w 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am going to go and drink some wobbly pops catch you tomorrow

  • @DungTran-js2oi
    @DungTran-js2oi 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How9/4?

  • @francisdelpuech6415
    @francisdelpuech6415 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The quadratic formula would have been faster but the CT was required

    • @glennwright9747
      @glennwright9747 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is interesting that if you use the general form of ax^2 + bx + c =0 and complete the square process you end up with the quadratic formula!

  • @user-jd3jr1hl2y
    @user-jd3jr1hl2y ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've been watching all the videos I can on quadratic equations and I can't understand it. Everyone who teaches this teaches it like you already know how to do it. No one really takes the time to explain it step for step and when they do they never explain why it is done that way. Why you do this step in this exact order. Why do we divide by two, why do we have to divide everything by 2 separately, things like that. Sadly after weeks of trying i don't think I'm ever going to figure this stuff out. Do you have any videos where you explain this stuff in greater detail?

    • @MsChemicalEngineer
      @MsChemicalEngineer 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you need help maybe you need a one on one tutor, I know it's confusing if you don't have experience solving equations. I know I can help, if you're interested, please let me know.

    • @glennwright9747
      @glennwright9747 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I had to think about that also. It is best explained by squaring(x+b) and seeing the resulting coefficients. Then running it backwards you see why you take the 1/2 b and then square that for the perfect square.

    • @heypauly2002
      @heypauly2002 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      One way that might help you, is to go the other direction. Start with the solution and end up with the equation. That way you can see where the equation comes from. Multiply (2x-4)(x-1). Set it all equal to zero.

  • @faukerconsulting835
    @faukerconsulting835 ปีที่แล้ว

    ☝🏻I would have enjoyed math more had the question AND answer then breakdown how you came to the conclusion...my brain seems to work backwards much like dyslexia but in its own recognition 🤷🏻‍♀️
    💁🏻‍♀️My "struggle" would be (did i forget to mention my brain works in its own way and inaccurately🙄) :
    2X × 1 = 2
    2X × 2 = 4
    2 + 4 = 6
    6 - 5 = 1

  • @sawdustwoodchips
    @sawdustwoodchips หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for this. But, No explanation as to why you half the x coefficient. And square. Just like many demonstrations it glosses over the fundamentals of maths. Better to show this graphically and then show that the quadratic equation is derived from completing the square. Also no mention of the fact that you can use completing the square to find the turning point of the quadratic.

  • @MrTfszip
    @MrTfszip 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WTF!!

  • @rogeraak7281
    @rogeraak7281 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Too much ineffective talk.

    • @tomtke7351
      @tomtke7351 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      gotta
      (-1-) know the student
      (-2-) pace delivery to accommodate the typical slow student

    • @blugarr
      @blugarr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@tomtke7351yeah but 17 minute video on doing one easy problem?

    • @tomtke7351
      @tomtke7351 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@blugarr but he's teaching NOT entertaining... his classroom is directed at the unknowing.... the rest of us are reviewing. Did you know you can turn up playback speed by up to 2x?

  • @thomashawkinson7017
    @thomashawkinson7017 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Too long and complicated. Better to skip this and focus on other math tools.

    • @andrewm6424
      @andrewm6424 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @thomashawkinson7017. Agreed. But why does the quadratic formula work? 😃

    • @andrewm6424
      @andrewm6424 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Point being, if I learned this in school, I completely forgot it after because I was taught to memorize everything for a test. So once the test was over, I didn’t need it. In essence, this caused me to graduate without learning anything. This video is important because it helps show the process that explains the quadratic formula, which will help others remember that well because they will know why it is needed and works.

    • @arkan7rb
      @arkan7rb 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yeah i skipped it 18 years ago and now after all that time i am struggling coz it came back to me at uni lol

    • @glennwright9747
      @glennwright9747 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@andrewm6424interesting how different minds think. I was never good at bulk memory work, but how the mechanism worked.
      Example: citric acid cycle I viewed as a mechanism that if you interferes with part of the cycle what would be the outcome. Never anticipated that the exam would be “ draw the citric acid cycle”, no question on what would happen in a diseased state what would be the outcome. To this day I realize some people only regurgitate memorized knowledge, while others use knowledge to extrapolate or manipulate that knowledge. Good engineers are generally not rote memorization.

  • @harrymatabal8448
    @harrymatabal8448 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Waste of time. Use quadratic formula. Easy