I suggest you read it yourself instead of someone else talk about it, however brilliantly. It's worth the time and mental energy; that is if you've already read Jane Eyre.
Madam while I do appreciate your efforts but this is a very text book elucidation of D&G. When you start that D&G's primarily challenge the psychoanalytic systems, you hardly dwell on how D&G's theory posits that. Why it's anti-oedipus? Also, deterritorialisation is not quite what you say. It's not equivalent to lines of flight. And I am surprised there's literally no mention of Body without organs. D&G's important concept. You keep repeating the same things. I wish this were more contemplative than merely a very superficial (wrong) understanding of their texts. D&G precisely challenge Freudians and Lacanians with Schizoanalysis
![30 ชั่วโมงคนเดียว บนรถไฟชั้น 3 โซเวียต [Around The World Ep. 2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MlE9boAVqDA/mqdefault.jpg)
Can u plz do a session on Baudrillard's 'Simulacra and Simulation'.
Please talk about "The Madwoman in the Attic" by Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar
I suggest you read it yourself instead of someone else talk about it, however brilliantly. It's worth the time and mental energy; that is if you've already read Jane Eyre.
Madam while I do appreciate your efforts but this is a very text book elucidation of D&G. When you start that D&G's primarily challenge the psychoanalytic systems, you hardly dwell on how D&G's theory posits that. Why it's anti-oedipus?
Also, deterritorialisation is not quite what you say. It's not equivalent to lines of flight.
And I am surprised there's literally no mention of Body without organs. D&G's important concept.
You keep repeating the same things. I wish this were more contemplative than merely a very superficial (wrong) understanding of their texts. D&G precisely challenge Freudians and Lacanians with Schizoanalysis
BWO is the core tenet/spirit of D&G's work. If there's no mention of it there's no need to watch that vid ig.