Weaponizing women's sexuality against men. This is an expression of sexual violence against men by women via men's sexuality. Hold women accountable for what they wear and who is able to see it.
If women weren't putting their 'goods' on display, it wouldn't be possible to 'down-blouse'. How about they exercise some prudence in their choice of attire? I notice that when it affects women, Amy thinks it is a big deal. When the same thing affects men, Amy is keen to dismiss it. The only consistent thing about feminists is their hypocrisy.
Miserable feminists is quite accurate. In my youth I caught more than a few comments from women. It turns out that when you train hard (martial arts) and have a rock solid body, women notice and comment. And, as with men, why not. Women have stared at my butt, made sexual comments, and in general expressed attraction. It's not an issue. Grow up. Even the 45+ year olds who were well past their prime and had a zero to negative chance of attracting me left me with nothing more than a minor uncomfortable feeling. Again, grow up. This is a you problem not a societal one. It hardly requires legal action and is in no way comparable to hatred or harassment. This woman is ridiculous and I think everyone can see through the histrionics.
For future use, Comedienne Sarah Millican jokes about how happy it made her feel to be cat-called. Amy Schumer joked about how she missed it on Graham Norton. Either Amanda Marcotte or Jessica Valenti wrote about how it had been a long time since they'd experience and how they hated a society that made them miss it. These might be good examples of how prominent women don't feel threatened by it.
When she asked him if he would be ok with his daughters getting wolf-whistled at, he should have just said "yes" instead of making out that it's some kind of unavoidable evil. It's not evil. It's not threatening. It's a compliment which men do not experience.
It's actually a very common question when debating with feminist. They would ask how would it feel if it happen to your daughter or mother or grandmother
You won that one, Mike! I think we are all very pleased with that. As someone on the Left I have heard you, and/or our colleagues, bring up how this type of thing amounts to a return to a return to Victorian values. Always a great point and could always be used more often. However, perhaps, we can start challenging feminist whimsy by calling them out on the implicit anti-working class sentiment, buried in such demands. I don't see many barristers and accountants on street corners shouting anything at women. May be we can call this out for what it is: Criminalising working class men and aspects of working class culture, on behalf of comfortable, (white) middle class women. Obviously this is intended for "leftist" feminists. They do NOT like getting called out like this. It seems to work well and preclude them from fighting back with the usual smears and misinformation. In fact, I do believe it one of the only times we get a display of humility, be it forced or false, from these despicable harpies. So far, from what I've seen, this approach stops them in their tracks by exposing their excess of privilege, and, thus, their hypocrisy on class issues; something they are at pains to downplay but cannot run from. They always need to backtrack and make amends at this point, thus denying themselves the opportunity of introducing any new talking point and giving you a much better chance to launch your own. I am much more at home with the substance of such arguments rather tactics used to deliver them. So, apologies if this was a facile contribution on any level. I just wanted to call attention to the possible under-utilisation of what is surely a promising tactic for MRAs.
- Domestic violence register? Yes. - Police patrols at night so people feel safe? Yes. - Criminalise Wolf whistling? Are you out of your mind? What a colossal waste of police and court time and resources.
The conversation is about "down-blousing" but the feminist ideologue immediately brought up flashing, sexual assault and murder. Incredibly disingenuous.
Both women wearing low tops, they should have issued jump suits with a neck locking mechanism. No make up in work either and flat shoes let's stop any sexualising of the work place.
Interesting discussion! Good job all. I know time was limited, but it would have been helpful if Mike or Dominique commented on the 2016 pilot Amy brought up.
The Nottingham pilot stated that it was an offence on public transport if women felt intimated by being looked at. Look up randomercam victim feelz. A reaction to Nottingham police PR video stating this Orwellian piece of legislation. He's also very funny in his munted news sessions (bottle of Jack and trying to read news stories coherently) but in his other vids chooses contentious issues that don't make him a darling of the algorithm. So give the drunk non-idiot a 'like'.
As an afghan veteren I'd say go and live with the taliban for a year and see how safe you feel as a woman compaired to britain. Lets see how long you last in Iran aswell!
Making lists of people who's behavior by their definition is problematic. You know, it doesn't really matter who wields power for what reason. The question is, what means of power we are giving to people and if using those means is proper. Making lists of people certainly isn't. Not in a liberal democracy.
My comment are showing up for only me to see. I use a different browser to check as this happens a lot, I wonder how many others are being banned from commenting.
Nothing will make these miserable dysfunctional harpies happy, and men should stop even trying. For some time we presented "Feminist of the Month" awards, one category being "Whiny Feminist of the Month" j4mb.org.uk/2023/02/25/whiny-feminists-of-the-month/
Make it 'easier' to 'solve' or 'handle' more serious crimes? My air quotes just broke off... Police already have a backlog of reports they have to handle. Most crimes will go cold if not investigated immediately. Add one screeching harpy who thinks everyman rapes her with his toxic stare and you suddenly have your officers caught in a catch22, they get blamed for not taking her serious enough or the 'serious' crimes take a back seat to pandering a psychopath with an attention seeking disorder.
Aren't the real issues, the real problems, associated with a woman's child not being able to gain survivalistic sustenance from her mother's breast because her breasts were damaged enough to render them inert? So if you do some chopping, fine: the chopper goes to jail. Other than that, I mean, looking?? Hello. LOOKING?? Looking at a bare breast? How can that possibly be a problem? Taking a photo of a breast with or without a woman's consent, that's a problem? We all need to get real. Enough already. I just do not "get" how saying a woman is beautiful is a problem, either verbally, or with a whistle, or however this message is conveyed. Lately, I've seen one beautiful woman: Karen Straughan. Otherwise known as GirlWritesWhat.
False allegations are an unrecognised crime
Weaponizing women's sexuality against men. This is an expression of sexual violence against men by women via men's sexuality. Hold women accountable for what they wear and who is able to see it.
If women weren't putting their 'goods' on display, it wouldn't be possible to 'down-blouse'. How about they exercise some prudence in their choice of attire?
I notice that when it affects women, Amy thinks it is a big deal. When the same thing affects men, Amy is keen to dismiss it. The only consistent thing about feminists is their hypocrisy.
Amen! Very true.
Miserable feminists is quite accurate. In my youth I caught more than a few comments from women. It turns out that when you train hard (martial arts) and have a rock solid body, women notice and comment. And, as with men, why not. Women have stared at my butt, made sexual comments, and in general expressed attraction. It's not an issue. Grow up. Even the 45+ year olds who were well past their prime and had a zero to negative chance of attracting me left me with nothing more than a minor uncomfortable feeling. Again, grow up. This is a you problem not a societal one. It hardly requires legal action and is in no way comparable to hatred or harassment. This woman is ridiculous and I think everyone can see through the histrionics.
I'd vote for any party that mandates burqas for all feminists
For future use, Comedienne Sarah Millican jokes about how happy it made her feel to be cat-called. Amy Schumer joked about how she missed it on Graham Norton. Either Amanda Marcotte or Jessica Valenti wrote about how it had been a long time since they'd experience and how they hated a society that made them miss it.
These might be good examples of how prominent women don't feel threatened by it.
Very good examples and counterarguments.
- I don't feel safe on London.
- Totes different.
- Why?
- Coz!
Because she views him as a lesser human being who doesn't deserve the protection reserved for women.
Where are all the stable families and communities created by feminism?
Or is is just about power? The power to destroy and not build.
When she asked him if he would be ok with his daughters getting wolf-whistled at, he should have just said "yes" instead of making out that it's some kind of unavoidable evil. It's not evil. It's not threatening. It's a compliment which men do not experience.
It's actually a very common question when debating with feminist. They would ask how would it feel if it happen to your daughter or mother or grandmother
You won that one, Mike! I think we are all very pleased with that. As someone on the Left I have heard you, and/or our colleagues, bring up how this type of thing amounts to a return to a return to Victorian values. Always a great point and could always be used more often.
However, perhaps, we can start challenging feminist whimsy by calling them out on the implicit anti-working class sentiment, buried in such demands. I don't see many barristers and accountants on street corners shouting anything at women. May be we can call this out for what it is: Criminalising working class men and aspects of working class culture, on behalf of comfortable, (white) middle class women.
Obviously this is intended for "leftist" feminists. They do NOT like getting called out like this. It seems to work well and preclude them from fighting back with the usual smears and misinformation. In fact, I do believe it one of the only times we get a display of humility, be it forced or false, from these despicable harpies. So far, from what I've seen, this approach stops them in their tracks by exposing their excess of privilege, and, thus, their hypocrisy on class issues; something they are at pains to downplay but cannot run from. They always need to backtrack and make amends at this point, thus denying themselves the opportunity of introducing any new talking point and giving you a much better chance to launch your own.
I am much more at home with the substance of such arguments rather tactics used to deliver them. So, apologies if this was a facile contribution on any level. I just wanted to call attention to the possible under-utilisation of what is surely a promising tactic for MRAs.
Got to keep those working clarse men going. They shouldn't have to think.
"during the trial wmn said they felt very safe"
Nonsense
- Domestic violence register? Yes.
- Police patrols at night so people feel safe? Yes.
- Criminalise Wolf whistling? Are you out of your mind? What a colossal waste of police and court time and resources.
The conversation is about "down-blousing" but the feminist ideologue immediately brought up flashing, sexual assault and murder. Incredibly disingenuous.
Both women wearing low tops, they should have issued jump suits with a neck locking mechanism. No make up in work either and flat shoes let's stop any sexualising of the work place.
Outstanding debate!!! 👍
Interesting discussion! Good job all. I know time was limited, but it would have been helpful if Mike or Dominique commented on the 2016 pilot Amy brought up.
The Nottingham pilot stated that it was an offence on public transport if women felt intimated by being looked at.
Look up randomercam victim feelz. A reaction to Nottingham police PR video stating this Orwellian piece of legislation.
He's also very funny in his munted news sessions (bottle of Jack and trying to read news stories coherently) but in his other vids chooses contentious issues that don't make him a darling of the algorithm.
So give the drunk non-idiot a 'like'.
As an afghan veteren I'd say go and live with the taliban for a year and see how safe you feel as a woman compaired to britain. Lets see how long you last in Iran aswell!
Typical msm debate : get 2 feminists on against 1 man.
Excellent! Thanks!
Remember the Diet Coke break ads ladies? Double standards much.
Making lists of people who's behavior by their definition is problematic. You know, it doesn't really matter who wields power for what reason. The question is, what means of power we are giving to people and if using those means is proper. Making lists of people certainly isn't. Not in a liberal democracy.
Aren't there more urgent issues in UK and Europe at the moment?... but Liz needs popularity... so....
My comment are showing up for only me to see. I use a different browser to check as this happens a lot, I wonder how many others are being banned from commenting.
Hi Mahna. We moderate all comments so there will sometimes be a delay (e.g. if we're asleep!)
Bravo Mike!! The first thing I would say to these phony, selfish females is what if men pay ZERO attention to you?! Would that make you happy?!!
Thanks Louis!
Nothing will make these miserable dysfunctional harpies happy, and men should stop even trying. For some time we presented "Feminist of the Month" awards, one category being "Whiny Feminist of the Month" j4mb.org.uk/2023/02/25/whiny-feminists-of-the-month/
@@justiceformenboys Absolutely, Mike! Once again, Bravo!!!!
Dominique was brilliant on this - measured and with common sense -- Amy is just looking for a means to attack men
Amy has been radicalised.
Make it 'easier' to 'solve' or 'handle' more serious crimes? My air quotes just broke off...
Police already have a backlog of reports they have to handle. Most crimes will go cold if not investigated immediately. Add one screeching harpy who thinks everyman rapes her with his toxic stare and you suddenly have your officers caught in a catch22, they get blamed for not taking her serious enough or the 'serious' crimes take a back seat to pandering a psychopath with an attention seeking disorder.
Aren't the real issues, the real problems, associated with a woman's child not being able to gain survivalistic sustenance from her mother's breast because her breasts were damaged enough to render them inert? So if you do some chopping, fine: the chopper goes to jail. Other than that, I mean, looking?? Hello. LOOKING?? Looking at a bare breast? How can that possibly be a problem? Taking a photo of a breast with or without a woman's consent, that's a problem? We all need to get real. Enough already.
I just do not "get" how saying a woman is beautiful is a problem, either verbally, or with a whistle, or however this message is conveyed. Lately, I've seen one beautiful woman: Karen Straughan. Otherwise known as GirlWritesWhat.
Karen Straughan? Takes us back, in person, nearly 7 years. I didn't even know about Honey Badger radio at the time, at ICMI 2016.