Why did I reject this paper? Research Paper Rejection Reasons | A/Professor Vidy Potdar

Why did I reject this paper? Research Paper Rejection Reasons | A/Professor Vidy Potdar
In this video, I will talk about why I rejected a research paper even though it was very well written.
~~~~Leave a review on Trust Pilot~~~~
If you found this video useful can I request you to leave a short review for this video on the Trust Pilot website? au.trustpilot....
~~~~Please SUBSCRIBE to see my new uploads.~~~~
~~~~Follow these 3 steps~~~~
Step 1 - Join my Community - community.vidy...
Step 2 - Email me at [e-mail] to receive a **discount voucher** for my upcoming courses on How to write a systematic literature review paper for high impact factor journals.
Step 3 - See all my other TH-cam videos to become a successful researcher.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The paper was submitted to a Q1 / A Ranked journal. I agreed to review the paper by reading the title and the abstract because they caught my attention. I thought it will be an interesting piece of research. Hence, I spent a fair bit of time reading the paper thoroughly so that I could understand what the authors were trying to convey/accomplish.
This paper had the following sub-sections
Title
Abstract
Introduction
Literature Review - 5 subsections
Methodology - 4 subsections
Results - 4 subsections
Conclusion
Implication
References
Total 42 pages long in double line spacing. Over 10000 words. More than 100 references, 10 pages of references, approx. 2000 words.
~~~~Now let's come to the main core of the paper. ~~~~
Why did I recommend this paper be rejected?
To answer this let's first look at what questions did they try to answer:
This paper wanted to answer the 5 questions about the use of social media for enhancing customer engagement.
Very promising topic and very practical in nature. Something that will be very useful for digital marketing professionals.
~~~~Research Questions / Hypotheses~~~~
Their questions were something along these lines:
1- Are internet-based start-up companies better at using social media to build customer engagement. Yes/No
2- Do businesses that have other businesses as their customers, so B2B, do they engage with individual customers. Yes/No
3- If you generate quality content will it lead to better engagement. Yes/No
4- If your content has called for action, will it result in higher engagement. Yes/No
5- Whether informing your customers via social media that your business in open during COVID lead to customer loyalty Yes/No
~~~~Main Reason~~~~
This brings me to the main reason for rejecting this paper.
You see the main issue with this paper was that it tackled a WRONG PROBLEM.
The questions that were raised in the research paper are known to the digital marketing community. They know the answers already.
It may not have been discussed in the academic literature, but that does not mean that that knowledge does not exist. It just exists in a different knowledge base.
~~~~Reference List~~~~
I then looked at the reference list and as I expected, almost all references were academic references.
If the authors would have looked at some white papers published by renowned marketing agencies I think they would have found the answer before starting this research.
~~~~Core Message~~~~
So what the core message that I want to convey here. If you are answering a wrong question, no matter how thorough your research is, it is of limited value and it will be hard to publish in a good journal.
~~~~Broaden your thinking~~~~
I think researchers should broaden their thinking and start thinking about the impact that their research will bring to the society or community.
Think about this, if I asked you to take your research findings or research paper and give it to industry practitioners who you think will benefit from your research, ARE YOU CONFIDENT TO give it to them and ready to get their honest feedback? or are you a bit hesitant?
~~~~Industry Academic Gap~~~~
Why is there a gap between academia and industry? This could be one of the reason.
Equally, we should think about what could be done to reduce this gap?
~~~~PhD Life~~~~
See as a PhD student, you are going to spend 3-4 years of your life doing research. Shouldn't you give a thought of what question you are going to answer and have you validated your research question before starting your research?
Because you do not want to in this position where your research may be thorough but the research question is wrong.
Give it a deep thought. It is very important and will help you immensely in your research journey.
~~~~Take away message~~~~
Apply the knowledge that I shared in this video.
Remember this 10 min video has the potential to make you a successful researcher if you follow my suggestions.
#honoursdegreeaustralia #systematicliteraturereview #SLRCourse #paperrejection #JournalPaper #PaperRejected #HowToGetYourPaperAccepted #phdresearch

[@sherazi11003]

Wrong problem with the right methodology most probably not give a chance for publication.
Thanks for sharing insight in very precise ways

[@VidyPotdar]

Thanks Kamran 🙏🙏

[@edapharhemajoneschullai8671]

Thanks Sir, very helpful.

[@VidyPotdar]

Thank you 🙏

[@samuelajiri672]

Ready to learn

[@VidyPotdar]

Welcome Samuel. What is your research about?

[@r0ckap3]

Thanks, Vidy. I will keep that in mind. Tosh.

[@VidyPotdar]

That's great Tony 👍👍

[@ambi152004]

Very informative session Professor...👍

[@VidyPotdar]

Thanks ARN

[@hakka5501]

By a wrong question you could mean the wrong answer to a practical problem. I.e. the PhD-student is losing sight of the hypothesis he has initially proposed.
(Uninterchangeably) I assume you mean that not enough contemplation is taken on what questions should be spent time on in the first place. Indeed, I remember having collected my Introduction info from my masters thesis right at the end, just to fill in the fluff (what are biomolecules, what can they tell us...). Not really review paper material, and it usually helps to find context when formulating your questions (it keeps essays shorter as well!).
However, in the case of basic research he may just want to study a phenomenon and describe causes of it as an introductory review to a topic. Though I have not seen the paper, I suppose 1) the paper to publish this article is too high-rank and 2) the questions are too simple to answer in such a lengthy manner, which is why you rejected it.
On a sidenote, nor is it that purely academic research is inherently bad, it really depends on the field of study and question proposed. But I did understand your takeaway: impactful research is grounded on the reality of said field and its professionals

[@VidyPotdar]

Hi Henri Avela. Yeah you are right. Basic research is equally important and the foundation of good theoretical basis. What I think is that researchers should spend good amount of time to think about their question. Discuss the question and get feedback from others. In specific disciplines it makes sense to talk to practitioners and get their views. In the end we should be solving problems that are not solved.

[@heenachoudhary]

Ready to learn...

[@VidyPotdar]

Welcome to the journey 👌👌👍👍

[@praweennishad1907]

Sir can I resubmitted rejected paper in the same journal after incorporating reviewers comments.

[@VidyPotdar]

If the journal paper in the review comments have not said that you cannot resubmit your paper to this journal then you can submit it

[@meaba1]

Q1 should have 2 choice and compared which is the better solution

[@VidyPotdar]

What do u mean I didn't understand?

[@kylenetherwood8734]

You take so long to give the reason which is ironic when talking about good research paper writing.

[@VidyPotdar]

Thank you for your feedback. I appreciate your perspective, and now when I see it I feel the explanation lengthy. Effective communication is crucial in research paper writing, and I'll strive to make my future explanations more concise while maintaining clarity. Your input helps me improve, and I hope you find my future content more to your liking. For short snappy content check out my instagram channel vidy.potdar
Thanks
Vidy

[@youtubehero4442]

R1 yes.... R2 yes... R3..yes... R4...yes... R5...yes

[@VidyPotdar]

Thanks Harjeet. 👍👍

[@heenachoudhary]

RQ1 Yes
RQ 2 Yes
RQ 3 Yes
RQ 4 Yes
RQ 5 Yes

[@VidyPotdar]

Thanks Heena

[@ROHITKUMAR-pl2us]

R1 Yes, R2 Yes, R3 Yes, R4 Yes, R5 Yes

[@VidyPotdar]

Thanks for sharing your learnings Rohit Kumar.

[@SamPJames16]

RTL

[@VidyPotdar]

Great Sam James. Welcome aboard 😊😊👌👌

[@SamPJames16]

R1:Yes R2:Yes R3: Yes R4: Yes R5: Yes