it's 3am and I just burst out laughing! The sleeping bear next to me wasn't happy but I think it's amazing! Thanks internet stranger, you're the best! 😆🤣😂😁
Question: how is that every person who is sponsored by Hello Fresh happens to have already used their product for years? It feels like there’s trickery afoot! 🤔
I'm studying a degree in fashion design and we've had a couple guest lecturers come and try to convince us that vr fashion is the future and i can confidently say that they were all batshit crypto-heads hiding behind a veneer of 'sustainability'.
@Sappho these type of people are the ones who I like to call wine critics. They pretend they understand what they are doing by saying funny big words that ultimately hold no meaning in their critique of things because they want to exude this air of luxury and intelligence, but really they are just good liars who leverage their reputation to earn cash rather than actually meaningfully critique something
The Water dress and the Oracle dress, after being made in real life, were Instagram filtres made by french fashion designer Clara Daguin (I was her intern at the time we were making the real life ones), and were not meant to become VR tik tok stuff They are really magnificent in real life and take hundreds of hours to make (they're all hand embroidered) and I think it's sad they just entend up being VR and disregarded because yes, 110$ for a VR dress is stupid, but in the first place they're also the work of a life time for some people
@@Lynn-rv4ty Probably some sort of deal i'd imagine, a use of a license to reproduce? Otherwise i cant imagine why the designer wouldnt go after them 👀
For years I was unaware people actually threw away clothes, like into the trash. It's literally so easy just to throw 'em in a bag and give them to a thrift store
The only time I’ve throw away clothes is when I rip them so bad the just becomes rags, and even then my mom would have me use them as like little towels or something
@@danteackroyd551 I just cut the stretched/holes/rips and then use the residual cloth as patches for my an other people's clothes or even as reinforcement for when they rip. Also making little plushes in my free time helps for my stressed ass.
I’m a student in fashion and we had guests come in and pretty much say: “Your stupid and an idiot for working hard on real life clothes, instead make digital clothes that look horrible and don’t fit you!” Then continued to passive aggressively insult us for working hard. *huh.*
@@_ikako_ nah they should have therapy and fix their problems. There are already too many angry problematic people in the game industry, we don’t need even more toxicity
@@_ikako_ lol dressx actually makes clothes in roblox and they kinda go hard. I guess they aren't too profitable and that's why they have to resort to these 😂
Yea, so. What they do, is you’re essentially paying for NFT clothing. You send them photos of you, and they pose and photoshop the clothing onto your body, and then send you back the photo that you can then post to IG. They’re not made for videos because they work awfully in video. The videos are for you to “try it on” and then you can pay for the photoshop. It’s pretty cringe, and a stupid waste of time and money. But so many people buy into it because of NFT excitement. The NFT stuff is equally as bad for the environment as just buying regular clothing.
Safiya Nygaard made a video about those and actually purchased a few. I'd recommend her video because it shows the whole process. Some of the pictures the company sent back to her really look like they didn't even try.
I would have bought the oculus quest 2 if you weren't forced to use fb. You have to have a fb account and if you get banned on fb you lose your purchased games. Wtf lol the idea of not needing a gaming pc was neat but bots on fb will ban you over anything so way too much of a risk
Haha yeah that would suck. Imagine how weird it would be if they changed their name to meta. That would be weird but that will never happen hahhahahahaha yeahhhh
What's so stupid is this could actually be a step in bringing VR to online clothing shopping, similar to Amazon's furniture feature, but you could see how the clothes look on you before you buy the actual thing, not some stupid photo filter....
Yea! Like a free photo filter before buying clothes irl to try it on, or even buying vr clothes *you wear in things like vrchat and other vr places* would be sick imo. Not a paid filter.... like what the hell
@@Venusflytrap-f2z taking the vr idea a little further, it would be cool to be able to buy like, a shirt with a fish on it and have the both the virtual version and the actual physical shirt.
@@OliverStarfall that would be insanely cool! And actually I'm pretty sure I've heard of places doing that before!! A lot of peoples vr avatars are based off themselves or are an ideal version of themself so it'd be cool to have the exact fashion of your vrself!
I love how they pretend this actually helps the environment. Not treating clothes like single use status symbols is a million times more effective and free.
"Unique NFT clothes" So they're acknowledging that they actively harm the environment and make things that cost way more money they ever should. If I want digital clothing I'll play a game with them like GTA 5. Then I don't spend money, only a little time.
@@miloshroom1 not only is it not free, it's absolutely filled to the brim with microtransactions. That said, you CAN play GTAO for no extra cost as long as you own GTA V and there honestly is a lot of fun clothing options, you're just gonna be constantly encouraged to buy virtual credit cards with GTA money on them.
I mean, if you're using them a lot and they bring you a lot of joy then buy it but if you're gonna use it like 5 times for pictures and it costs $110 then don't.
I saw some companies that make their clothes accesible as a 3D model for vr usage (vrchat) as a bonus when you buy it's real counterpart, but this is just absolutely ridiculous
@@missingtexturez I think a channel called "phia" or "the virtual reality show" made a video on it, they can be used to put on avatars in specific avatar makers or as a 3d model to use as you wish
Cool Bug Facts! Don't throw away your clothes after three uses you damned bitch oooh i despise them so much... how do you have that much money to throw away? Oh my God I can't with humanity anymore, some people are just.... not ... _ideal_
@@Ava-nf2qq you do realise that you can always make clothes smaller right 😅 I get the complaint/disclaimer that there's nothing for plus sized people out there but come on now (and especially online thrifting is full of xs clothing)
@@xLiLlyx98 I've tried to make clothes smaller to fit me but it just ends up looking so messy. Altering them too much ruins the shape of the clothes and on top of that I'm only 5 feet😭😭😭😭 so most of the clothes are too long for me.
@@fairlysleepy the only knife i like using is my paring knife. i bought a pack of knives and it didn't come with a smaller chopping knife and i'm not gonna use an 8" knife daily to cut onions and peppers lolol
It’s a giant scam, but I definitely agree that the amount of waste we create from fast fashion is INSANE and the problem continues to grow. I think the solution is ethically produced, PRACTICAL clothes that are built to last a long time. Such clothes are becoming increasingly hard to find, and increasingly expensive. Most stores where I used to find pieces that lasted years, now when I buy items from them, I’m lucky if I get a few months of use out of them before they are no longer wearable. It’s getting ridiculous.
I don’t necessarily think it’s a scam. You’re paying for a photoshop service essentially. That’s still a service. After all the point are the pictures.
Thats insane Even the thrift stores are starting to get expensive, which is unfortunate because I basically live in then considering how much I thrift.
@@MissCaraMint Well, more accurately, you're paying a hundred dollars for a filter that you still have to photoshop in order to make it look even somewhat natural
What's your definition of no longer wearable? I see this talked about with fast fashion and I won't deny it but are we saying the stitching is coming undo and the whole sleeve fell off or like the button fell off and you just have to resew it back on?
@@catpaws2452 Maybe they mean the clothes physically degrade over time, but since I haven't seen a lot of that in my personal experience, it's hard to be sure
As a bespoke tailor and costume maker, I was convinced that high fashion hit the rock bottom of absurdity years ago. Thank you ChadChad for proving me wrong. 😅👍
update: they have a video where someone does a flip in virtual pants and the filter does NOT succeed whatsoever in staying on the person, and i find it so shocking that they actually posted it
As a novice fashion designer (hopefully), some of these designs and prices hurt my soul; though it does give me an odd feeling of self confidence that my designs aren't all that strange Edit: Thank you everyone for the support and kind words! I'll try my best to make some awesome outfits! (Ow
@@noir._.drawingz4466 a good point, everyone was wearing dresses and cloths - now clothes. The first person to make a few seams and rope tie the bottoms to their waiste must've looked a right weirdo haha
if you design fashion - in your free time, professionally, whatever - you’re a fashion designer. don’t sell yourself short!!! you’ll be better off for it :)
Granted, I can see what point they're trying to make with digital clothes saving resources (even though you wear clothes underneath them, you don't need to get NEW real clothes for every outfit) but also... "do fast fashion virtually" is such a backwards solution to "fast fashion is bad." That site straight up says "don't shop less, shop digital fashion" but like... maybe do shop less? They're just feeding the same thought pattern that convinces people to be constantly buying and throwing away clothes.
@@anerrorhasoccurred8727SAME WITH ELECTRIC CARS theyre actually seriously energy inefficient, to the point where it harms the environment more to produce the electricity they run on than to just burn gas 😭
@@anerrorhasoccurred8727im not anti-electric cars tho, i just think they need to be much more efficient before they can actually be of any use. plus im anti-tesla and anti-elon musk
I love how this entire product design is based off having virtual clothes instead of real clothes, meanwhile every single ad they have is someone using it over their real clothes and having their actual clothes be extremely noticeable
What the world is dying from over consumption? Hmmmm that sounds like actually doing something about it could mean making less money. 😢 Won’t someone think of the poor poor ultra rich? I know! Let’s have just as much consumption but consume *nothing*, and we keep making money because that’s a goal that’ll never backfire ever 😊. /s if it wasn’t obvious fuck all these techno-fetishists-green-capistalist-morons
I like the idea that instagram influencers would use AR clothes instead of doing Shein hauls and then throwing that shet away after 1 pic, but damn why are they sooooo expensive? like you said, it's still a filter and it doesn't solve a problem which is that people splurge on fast fashion because it's cheap and looks good in the photo. AR clothes are just doing a make -believe at this point trying to sell you smth that is 1. expensive 2. can't be worn irl 3. looks (questionable) in the photo / does not look good in a video
It's probably so expensive since there's still artists and designers behind the work, the clothes have to be modeled and rigged too. It's kinda silly sure, but if they're not hurting anyone I hardly see an issue. That's why the fact that they sell NFTs is the real issue here. You don't have to contribute to environmental destruction to put on some digital clothes.
@@Fauna_CR yeah but I distinctly remember them making the claim that their goal is to fight fashion pollution, so what we have here instead is greenwashing. Also I work with people who make AR filters and I promise you none of those are worth a 100$. (Real) fashion costs so much because garment construction is a very complicated process which involves a lot more skill than creating an AR filter and a lot more resources, which is why designer items are so valuable. You can do whatever you want with your money though, my point is simply that the eco-friendly claims are bs and this is just another money grab.
In Safia Nygaard’s video, they actually photoshop the clothing onto your still images when you pay for them. The AR is the “free” version for people who won’t pay per edit. It’s still really silly, but they look better than just the AR ones
@@Fauna_CR someone else mentioned this in another comment, but some of their designs are actually stolen from other artists. The price would be one thing if they were paying actual designers and digital artists to make the clothes high quality and good looking, but if they’re stealing other people’s designs they have no excuse.
How many people actually THROW AWAY clothes after wearing them once?? Back when I was first getting into fashion in 8th grade, fast fashion was all I could afford--but many of those piece are still in my wardrobe five years later or have been handed down/sold at thrift stores @_@
Yeah, and at the least if you do come into money and pick up some newer clothes you can still donate the older ones or sell them on if they're worth it. I still have cheap clothes from like 8 years ago
I have a hoodie I bought when I was 16 and I’m 37 now. It’s still fine except it’s now more orange than red. And it wasn’t an expensive hoodie - I’m pretty sure I got it at Kmart. People are wild.
I know someone who throws clothes in the trash tote literally because of convenience. Because bagging them up and taking them to your local thift store (not goodwill because they suck) is too much work. But somehow they have all the time in the world to put up thousands of lights and shit around their house during the holidays. They are not the brightest crayon in the box obviously.
You know if everything wasn't made as gimmick to make a buck off people, this technology could actually be used for online clothes shopping. It could give you a rough idea on how it would look on you before you buy without all the negatives of trying out clothes in retail.
Well there s a difference between someone who learned modelling software because they like it or need it for serious projects, vs when they dip their toes into such software as a secondary goal to making them stupid whimsical clothes
You are correct about them photoshopping the good looking photos because thats actually the business, the videos are just the app to let you 'see what they'd look like'... Which is worse because they charge by photo, so those dresses aren't over 100 dollars for a bad ar dress, they're 100 dollars for them to photoshop a model onto a picture you send them. PER PHOTO. And it's not even that good! Safiya Nygaard did a real in depth video on this exact company and the results were. . . Like she tried to be positive and see both sides of it but yeah they are... not even that good at the photoshop.
@@tessarae9127 No, I’m pretty sure they don’t do videos for ”clients”, only photos. These videos are just to show what they look like on you. But it looks like the virtual clothes are like a filter if that makes sense. So it’s not photoshopped on frame by frame. I’m bad at explaining things, sorry
I haven't looked into this at all so I've no idea what I'm talking about - but I'm guessing they basically take your pic, build a scene in some 3D software that approximates what's in the pic (similar lighting, maybe some objects if you're lucky), pose a human model to match you and hang the clothes on it, and then composite the render with the original pic. There's a fair few hours' work in that, so if that's what they're charging for and not the snap filter, I guess that's not ~so~ bad? I mean I'm not sure how many people would actually want that and if the results aren't great, maybe they're not putting in ~that~ much work...
I think Safiya Nygaard’s video about this is really interesting because she acknowledges some of the potential positives in the concept, like how it’s a way to explore fashion outside of the realm of reality and it could potentially make more extravagant clothing more accessible to be “worn” for people, but also talks about her issues with it, particularly the price and limited nature of it for that price, and how that kind of undermines the latter potential benefit.
Was looking to see if anyone had mentioned her video yet. It's definitely true that digital fashion can have interesting applications, but any benefits are pretty much undermined. I also didn't realise this company sells NFTs, so that counters basically any positive
I feel like this could be a useful app if it allowed you to “try on” clothes digitally before buying them. That should be their business model for something like this.
The funniest part is that if you buy it, they'll do the photoshopping of the pics you sent them, but if months later you want new pics you have to buy the whole outfit again. It's ridiculous. Safiya did a video on dressX
Technically, these examples are AR (augmented reality) not VR (virtual reality). But to be the most accurate, they are just "digital" clothes because they can be used on any 3D platform. They're just 3D models.
It’s almost ingenious, playing on this “fear” that VR will eventually replace EVERYTHING and we will be living like the people on the spaceship in Wall•E
VR doesn't make sense with this product though. AR kind of does if somebody could get in inventing a pair of ar glasses that look cool and get universally adopted by the masses. Dunno why everybody is sleeping on AR.
@@strayiggytv VR makes more sense than AR for this, adding another clothing model to a virtual world is easy and that's a thing people are already into. Getting something like this to work in AR without looking jank as hell is an incredibly complex problem!
ya know, as a kid I was told the story of the emperor's new clothes and I thought that both the emperor and the merchant scamming him were idiots because I believed that there was no way anybody would actually be dumb enough to buy fake clothes...
I like the idea that a fashion group could photoshop their looks onto models so they can create looks that can’t be easily made in real life. The fact that they sell it and expect people to buy it is pretty ridiculous. Why do people have to ruin good ideas?
Thanks to depop sellers I can’t even afford to buy or FIND second hand clothes (disability assistance, I can’t order online), and some people are paying real life money for f a k e clothes? Being alive feels beyond lovecraftian at this point
Inb4 someone defends resellers… no. Also a lot of people legitimately consider going to a second hand store to be a DATE IDEA? Or just something to do when bored, or for DIY videos, a “new cheap outfit”, this stuff is hurting the people who are completely reliant on low income resources. If your stores aren’t getting emptied, be thankful
I get what you’re saying but I’ve never entered a thrift store and have it lacking clothing. Depop sellers aren’t great but let’s not act like there’s a shortage of donated clothing
I used to work in a thrift shop and resellers would snatch things out of employees and customer’s hands, load up a cart to keep it away from other customers l, unabashedly and publicly look up the resale value on items, and then put them back in the wrong spot if the profit margin isn’t high enough. They also stop employees carts mid-push, mess up the order of items the employee hasn’t put away yet, and in general make the employees (who are often hired through programs that help disabled people) jobs a lot harder
@@bunnyfrosting1744 Girly I like looking for clown dolls in the second-hand stores. Unless you know abt a dedicated clown shop you can't stop people from entering shit like Goodwill looking for things besides clothes. Also yes re-using things is good for the environment so whether low or high income is not the concern here.
I know this video is kinda old but can we take a moment to appreciate the little things that chad chad includes in her videos?? like saying "if you can afford to" at 11:22 instead of just "don't shop fast fashion" to encourage people to do the right thing without putting pressure on people who actually can't. it's the little things like that that make such a big difference.
It is unfathomable that the marketing team validated these ads, like "hmm, yeah, hmmm, our product is really shining in this clip". Everything looks awful ! I mean, even a satire of digital clothing wouldn't look that bad in fear of being treated as "bad faith".
To me this is the same kinda shit as switching to compostable plastic cups to "save the environment". Yes I guess it's marginally better for the environment, but it still promotes the same culture of overconsumption that is closer to the root of the problem. Do we really think this VR fashion concept deters people from wanting more clothing for social media? Or does it just feed that mentality which will still drive people to buy fast fashion?
Yeah like,, the fact that it says “don’t shop less, shop virtual” is SO telling. Overconsumption is a huge issue and so many companies/influencers/etc try to greenwash themselves while still promoting it.
Plus just buy less, having virtual clothes is not the same as the pleasure of styling a real outfit, and you can’t materially use them, while compostable plastic cups are actually useful
Overconsumption isn't the problem, companies literally dumping billions of gallons of oil into the ocean and millions of tons of CO2 into the air, and literally nothing happening, is the problem. Corporations could push for less consumption if they wanted to. We're just living in the paradigm provided.
@@stitchfinger7678 well, yes you’re right, but I think corporations are pushing the current culture of overconsumption/consumerism, and have benefited from it for a while. Obviously the average person isn’t to blame, but what can we do against a corporation, especially one that has made itself necessary in our (I’m speaking from a North American perspective btw) society? The only thing to do is consume less, and vote. Even buying green, if bought mindlessly, will cause excess waste and damage (and so many companies greenwash that green products likely aren’t as green as implied). Sometimes it’s just nice to do something easy to sleep at night. Like buying less, or using public transit. Nobody thinks that’ll save the world, or that it’s the only problem. Just that it’s *a* problem, and one of the only ones the average person can actually control. It doesn’t solve much, but apathy and a “no ethical consumption under capitalism, so why bother” attitude solves less. Idk I’m probably preaching to the choir here though.
How is producing compostable food items contributing to overconsumption lmao food is literally the ONE thing we will always need to consume daily. This example makes no sense
If people really want to make a difference and buy less real fashion, learning to mend clothes is super easy, super cheap and a great life skill! But also Chad Chad every single one of your videos is a delight, please make more, thank you, you are glorious (and your corn virtual outfit is the very height of fashion).
5:59 I'M SORRY, DID THAT SAY THAT DIGITAL CLOTHING PRODUCES 97% LESS CO2 THAN *ACTUAL CLOTHING* omfg it does, guess we all need to only look at eachother through digital apps now so we're not wasting energy on clothing /s
Safiya Nygaard made a video about this and it seems that what you're really paying for is for someone to photoshop the clothes into a picture of you. And you may think "cool, 110$ dress is pricey but at least I can get a few cool pics out of it" but no, that's 110$ per use. And you pay for each piece in the picture even if it's just one picture. I think Safiya also had a few pics turn out badly photoshopped and wasn't able to get them redone without paying again.
The only thing this can be useful is for designing, like seeing how clothes might fit and look on somebody while it's being designed. Like the clothes come later.
honestly the concept of vr clothes would actually be great for cinema, given that more time be put into making it stable. But also isn't that just what motion capture is? You can motion capture someone into a beast im pretty sure you can do the same with clothes already
Do all the time. A lot of modern films are more visual effects than they are actual footage. Marvel are especially well-known for this. You can tell it's CGI when you see people doing something that obviously isn't real like riding dinosaurs, but most of the effects in movies are simply because it's faster and cheaper to fix things in CGI than to film things perfectly. That can include changing an actor's clothing to make their pose more dramatic, or because the director decided they want to make a stylistic change to the wardrobe. Changing the outfit in visual effects can be cheaper than setting up the stage again to re-film a scene.
Im super against fast fashion and literally throwing clothes away!! The only time they get tossed in the can is if they are destroyed beyond repair. If i can fix it, i do! And anything i or my fam doesnt wear anymore gets donated.
As far as I'm aware: The choppy videos are from their free app, where you can try on the filters. The final product (the photo) is what you're actually paying for. As far as I remember the price also includes the photoshopping price where the put it on your body (the actual final product).
Yeah, and he was convinced only the wise can see the 'clothes' and since everybody wanted to keep their job, they confirmed the 'existance' of the clothes and even giving compliments. Didn't last very long when a child pointed out the fact that he's literally butt naked, showing his milimeter defeater for all to see.
THOSE CLOTHES LOOK RIDICULOUS 😂😂😂 maybe there's an upside on not getting those clothes physically bc what tf is happening with that 03:57 pillow mess omg imagine wearing that outside
I was fully distracted by the fact that I own that exact same shirt you're wearing... Which I'm pretty sure I bought 17 years ago at some random beachside store in Ontario. 😅 Somehow it still makes the cut after all these years.
“I have worn 67 digital outfits so far, that means I have saved 264,000 liters of water” you’re telling me that each outfit saves 3,940 liters of water? Yeah okay
The water usage to make an outfit is probably a lot higher than that. Cotton needs a lot of irrigation. It's still terrible math though, as it assumed that each digital outfit used is one real outfit not used. It's the same math that media companies use to explain why piracy is costing the economy trillions of dollars: Take the number of downloaded MP3 files, multiply by the retail value of an album on day of release, wave figure at lawmakers.
it's also just, why even bring that up? the clothes were already made, buying a digital outfit isn't going to bring back the water used to make said clothes
@@vylbird8014 do you understand how the water cycle works, at all? Transpiration/evaporation- condensation, precipitation, repeat. The water that goes into watering crops literally evaporates back into the atmosphere and rains down back into dams and reservoirs.
@@audreydoyle5268 Yes, but it doesn't rain back down in the places you want it. Fresh water will never run our, but each region only gets so many centimetres-per-year. In drier regions that isn't enough for the agriculture they run so it has to be supplemented with groundwater, which does run out.
you are right, you’re paying the company to photoshop the clothes on you. they’re transparent about it it, it’s just a strange way to advertise overpriced photoshop services tbh
6:08 I genuinely don’t know the last time I laughed this hard. I literally was yelling in my laugh because of how funny this was. Props, this is amazing.
I’m so proud of you and how far you’ve come dude. You deserve every single joy and happiness I thought about you a lot today and I just wanted you to know how thankful I am for you. Your videos saved me and gave me a piece of my personality I thought I had lost. Thank you always I hope you see this and do something silly stupid fun ❤️❤️
8:20 Hey, I'm a genius so I can solve the clothing waste issue! No, hear me out, I know it's crazy, but; maybe just buy less, wear clothes more than once or for one day, donate old clothes rather than throwing them in the garbage. If they get torn, still not garbage; those are dish rags and patch material for still functioning clothes. I'm 30, and I haven't bought a shirt in atleast a decade. Got some as gifts inbetween then, sure, but same rules apply.
"This feels like Where's Waldo if Waldo was 5 times bigger than everyone else and kept glitching off of the page." I laughed so hysterically hard the air left my body. I died. I am dead.
learning how to sew is really great bc as a plus sized person, even if you can find "your size" in stores, 80% of the time it doesn't actually fit, also don't buy fabric at craft stores, get stuff online if you can. Infinitely cheaper and probably better quality
When I first saw these “clothes” I just thought they were clothing concepts for a video game. You cant even imagine my disappointment when I found out their not
I love how in the Water Dress add she just point to some random blank spot on the screen. Infact, all these ads are just off putting enough to be cringey. Like that one where it looks like she is repeatedly "Missing the Whoa."
Calling a naked person a "Wardrobe Denier" has rocked me to my core
it's 3am and I just burst out laughing! The sleeping bear next to me wasn't happy but I think it's amazing! Thanks internet stranger, you're the best! 😆🤣😂😁
@@safiya5185 pov you are a wardrobe denier
Bald people are hair deniers
Nudist? No I’m just a wardrobe denier
Question: how is that every person who is sponsored by Hello Fresh happens to have already used their product for years? It feels like there’s trickery afoot! 🤔
There is literally a children's story about a foolish king who bought expensive, not real, clothes. How do these people not see the irony?
*gasp*! How dare you! I’ll let you know that those transparent and weightless cloths cost me a fortune, therefore they MUST be real! /s
can't wait until a child screams at them that they aren't wearing clothes
At least this time they told us to wear real clothes underneath our not real clothing!
The emperor's new VR drip
I didn't even think about that that's so funny lol
People keep yelling at me for being ‘naked’ in public. Ummmm, put on some VR googles and you’ll actually see that I’m slaying 🙄🙄
i have the same problem
haters gonna hate
Wow this emperor's new clothes reboot sounds great
Those poor people without VR googles. SMH.
@@fricketyfracktraintrack underrated
I like how they advertise their earrings as an alternative to non-pierced ears as if clip-ons weren't already a thing.
And as if piercing your ears isn't one of the easiest, quickest things to do on the planet.
@@AvruthlelbhEasy unless you don't want to do it
Thank you Thoma
@@Avruthlelbhto be fair I use clip ons because my parents don't let me pierce my ears
I use clip on because I have ear infections often
I'm studying a degree in fashion design and we've had a couple guest lecturers come and try to convince us that vr fashion is the future and i can confidently say that they were all batshit crypto-heads hiding behind a veneer of 'sustainability'.
god thats depressing
The en ef tees of clothing basically
hope u get ur degree 1, and 2, those people were def on something.
Buying and selling nothing for stupid prices and pretend it has practical application
Yeah that's crypto nft alright
@Sappho these type of people are the ones who I like to call wine critics. They pretend they understand what they are doing by saying funny big words that ultimately hold no meaning in their critique of things because they want to exude this air of luxury and intelligence, but really they are just good liars who leverage their reputation to earn cash rather than actually meaningfully critique something
The Water dress and the Oracle dress, after being made in real life, were Instagram filtres made by french fashion designer Clara Daguin (I was her intern at the time we were making the real life ones), and were not meant to become VR tik tok stuff
They are really magnificent in real life and take hundreds of hours to make (they're all hand embroidered) and I think it's sad they just entend up being VR and disregarded because yes, 110$ for a VR dress is stupid, but in the first place they're also the work of a life time for some people
thanks for sharing! :) those ones were definitely the coolest concepts
@@shawnalynn5198 that's how you can tell they aren't original
so did the company just steal these or was there like some sort of deal?
You didn’t have to flex that hard on us
@@Lynn-rv4ty Probably some sort of deal i'd imagine, a use of a license to reproduce? Otherwise i cant imagine why the designer wouldnt go after them 👀
For years I was unaware people actually threw away clothes, like into the trash. It's literally so easy just to throw 'em in a bag and give them to a thrift store
honestly me and my family recycle all our clothing bc of how helpful it is
Because there are clothes that end up so ripped up that are literally unwearable?
The only time I’ve throw away clothes is when I rip them so bad the just becomes rags, and even then my mom would have me use them as like little towels or something
When my family's clothes get too old to donate, we cut them up and use them as cleaning rags
@@danteackroyd551 I just cut the stretched/holes/rips and then use the residual cloth as patches for my an other people's clothes or even as reinforcement for when they rip.
Also making little plushes in my free time helps for my stressed ass.
I’m a student in fashion and we had guests come in and pretty much say:
“Your stupid and an idiot for working hard on real life clothes, instead make digital clothes that look horrible and don’t fit you!”
Then continued to passive aggressively insult us for working hard. *huh.*
they should really just go work for a game company as an art director where they can make digital clothes people actually want to use...
@@_ikako_ nah they should have therapy and fix their problems. There are already too many angry problematic people in the game industry, we don’t need even more toxicity
@@_ikako_ As a concept artist don't compare us to those people
@@_ikako_ lol dressx actually makes clothes in roblox and they kinda go hard. I guess they aren't too profitable and that's why they have to resort to these 😂
Yea, so. What they do, is you’re essentially paying for NFT clothing.
You send them photos of you, and they pose and photoshop the clothing onto your body, and then send you back the photo that you can then post to IG.
They’re not made for videos because they work awfully in video.
The videos are for you to “try it on” and then you can pay for the photoshop.
It’s pretty cringe, and a stupid waste of time and money.
But so many people buy into it because of NFT excitement.
The NFT stuff is equally as bad for the environment as just buying regular clothing.
Its so awfully photoshopped as well
@@yuki97kira True, and some of the "futuristic" designs look like a very fukked up animal balloons,
Fuck NFTS
Except clothes don't take put power grids 💀
Safiya Nygaard made a video about those and actually purchased a few. I'd recommend her video because it shows the whole process. Some of the pictures the company sent back to her really look like they didn't even try.
i love vr and i sure hope it doesn’t get corrupted into a gross byproduct of captialism involving facebook right guys
bot
True thaaaat.
that's very "Metaverse" of you
I would have bought the oculus quest 2 if you weren't forced to use fb. You have to have a fb account and if you get banned on fb you lose your purchased games. Wtf lol the idea of not needing a gaming pc was neat but bots on fb will ban you over anything so way too much of a risk
Haha yeah that would suck. Imagine how weird it would be if they changed their name to meta. That would be weird but that will never happen hahhahahahaha yeahhhh
What's so stupid is this could actually be a step in bringing VR to online clothing shopping, similar to Amazon's furniture feature, but you could see how the clothes look on you before you buy the actual thing, not some stupid photo filter....
Yea! Like a free photo filter before buying clothes irl to try it on, or even buying vr clothes *you wear in things like vrchat and other vr places* would be sick imo. Not a paid filter.... like what the hell
Ikk that would make online shopping so much easier then having to return shit when it doesn’t look right on you.
@@Venusflytrap-f2z taking the vr idea a little further, it would be cool to be able to buy like, a shirt with a fish on it and have the both the virtual version and the actual physical shirt.
@@OliverStarfall that would be insanely cool! And actually I'm pretty sure I've heard of places doing that before!! A lot of peoples vr avatars are based off themselves or are an ideal version of themself so it'd be cool to have the exact fashion of your vrself!
Clothing websites are working on the AR try-on thing at the moment. It will become pretty mainstream soon.
I admire this woman. She gets arrested in so many of her videos, and still breaks out of prison to give us more content :D
I love how they pretend this actually helps the environment. Not treating clothes like single use status symbols is a million times more effective and free.
instead theyre LIFETIME use COOLNESS symbols of your KICKASS FASHION TASTE and your CARE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND OVERSEAS SWEATSHOP WORKERS ‼️‼️
and you save mawney
I mean it is environmentally good
If Chad Chad taught history, I would totally attend her classes.
like yes, i would love the artistic skits 😩😩
Same👏
@@safiya5185 shut up
If Chad Chad taught ANYTHING, I would totally attend her classes.
@@joy100ish Mood
"Unique NFT clothes"
So they're acknowledging that they actively harm the environment and make things that cost way more money they ever should.
If I want digital clothing I'll play a game with them like GTA 5. Then I don't spend money, only a little time.
GTA 5 is free?
@@maddieb.4282 it’s not tho?
@@miloshroom1 not only is it not free, it's absolutely filled to the brim with microtransactions. That said, you CAN play GTAO for no extra cost as long as you own GTA V and there honestly is a lot of fun clothing options, you're just gonna be constantly encouraged to buy virtual credit cards with GTA money on them.
I mean, if you're using them a lot and they bring you a lot of joy then buy it but if you're gonna use it like 5 times for pictures and it costs $110 then don't.
love nikki
uhhh shining nikki now i guess?
you don't wear them, only your avatar does, but the point stands
splatoon?
I saw some companies that make their clothes accesible as a 3D model for vr usage (vrchat) as a bonus when you buy it's real counterpart, but this is just absolutely ridiculous
Yeah that's just cool lol
was it like just the shirt as the model or is it meant to be put over an avatar,or is it on like a mannequin model
uuuuuuuooo i like that
@@missingtexturez i just can't help but think people wlaking around like a floating t-shirt lololol
@@missingtexturez I think a channel called "phia" or "the virtual reality show" made a video on it, they can be used to put on avatars in specific avatar makers or as a 3d model to use as you wish
Fun fact! thrifting helps the environment more than vr clothes
Cool Bug Facts!
Don't throw away your clothes after three uses you damned bitch
oooh i despise them so much... how do you have that much money to throw away? Oh my God I can't with humanity anymore, some people are just.... not ... _ideal_
thrifting only works for medium-large people there’s nothing that fits an XS person in there 😭
@@Ava-nf2qq you do realise that you can always make clothes smaller right 😅 I get the complaint/disclaimer that there's nothing for plus sized people out there but come on now (and especially online thrifting is full of xs clothing)
The coolest clothes I've ever found were at thrift stores.
@@xLiLlyx98 I've tried to make clothes smaller to fit me but it just ends up looking so messy. Altering them too much ruins the shape of the clothes and on top of that I'm only 5 feet😭😭😭😭 so most of the clothes are too long for me.
My favourite part of Hello Fresh sponsorships is watching people use their smallest knife possible to chop things. Hell yeah. Great stuff.
I don't get it, why do they all have small knives 😭 do they not have normal knives
@@fairlysleepy it makes me think it might be a requirement of the ad reads
@@Hannahgs such a weird rule, I love it.
@@fairlysleepy the only knife i like using is my paring knife. i bought a pack of knives and it didn't come with a smaller chopping knife and i'm not gonna use an 8" knife daily to cut onions and peppers lolol
@@tourmii why not
Loved the quick history lesson in the beginning. Chad Chad *is* an educational channel
Chad chad is book smart, but also streets smart 👏🏽
@@sanestflexican I am too! I know what street I live on AND I’ve read a book before 😎😎😎
@@JJLiu-xc3kg wow please be my teacher you are extremely smart 🙏😱
totally
It’s a giant scam, but I definitely agree that the amount of waste we create from fast fashion is INSANE and the problem continues to grow. I think the solution is ethically produced, PRACTICAL clothes that are built to last a long time. Such clothes are becoming increasingly hard to find, and increasingly expensive. Most stores where I used to find pieces that lasted years, now when I buy items from them, I’m lucky if I get a few months of use out of them before they are no longer wearable. It’s getting ridiculous.
I don’t necessarily think it’s a scam. You’re paying for a photoshop service essentially. That’s still a service. After all the point are the pictures.
Thats insane
Even the thrift stores are starting to get expensive, which is unfortunate because I basically live in then considering how much I thrift.
@@MissCaraMint Well, more accurately, you're paying a hundred dollars for a filter that you still have to photoshop in order to make it look even somewhat natural
What's your definition of no longer wearable? I see this talked about with fast fashion and I won't deny it but are we saying the stitching is coming undo and the whole sleeve fell off or like the button fell off and you just have to resew it back on?
@@catpaws2452 Maybe they mean the clothes physically degrade over time, but since I haven't seen a lot of that in my personal experience, it's hard to be sure
Chad Chad is probably the only person who can pull off every hair colour so well
@Ciluk Bokhaiy no
@Ciluk Bokhaiy ew wtf 💀
check out Naomi Jon then
And Tuv! He can pull off any color or styles istg
@leo tru ..she rocked the green hair too
As a bespoke tailor and costume maker, I was convinced that high fashion hit the rock bottom of absurdity years ago.
Thank you ChadChad for proving me wrong.
😅👍
High fashion? More like BYE, fashion!
this is the best video i've ever seen
Have you watched your own videos haha jk.. unless haha
Have you watched your own videos haha jk.. unless haha
Thanks!
E
E
update: they have a video where someone does a flip in virtual pants and the filter does NOT succeed whatsoever in staying on the person, and i find it so shocking that they actually posted it
As a novice fashion designer (hopefully), some of these designs and prices hurt my soul; though it does give me an odd feeling of self confidence that my designs aren't all that strange
Edit: Thank you everyone for the support and kind words! I'll try my best to make some awesome outfits! (Ow
Haha I’m sure your designs are great! Good luck with the fashion industry :)
@@Jo-dk9my (^w^) thank you
@@noir._.drawingz4466 a good point, everyone was wearing dresses and cloths - now clothes.
The first person to make a few seams and rope tie the bottoms to their waiste must've looked a right weirdo haha
if you design fashion - in your free time, professionally, whatever - you’re a fashion designer. don’t sell yourself short!!! you’ll be better off for it :)
Good luck becoming successful in the fashion industry and I wish you the best ❤️
Granted, I can see what point they're trying to make with digital clothes saving resources (even though you wear clothes underneath them, you don't need to get NEW real clothes for every outfit) but also... "do fast fashion virtually" is such a backwards solution to "fast fashion is bad." That site straight up says "don't shop less, shop digital fashion" but like... maybe do shop less? They're just feeding the same thought pattern that convinces people to be constantly buying and throwing away clothes.
they think they're doing something whilst they sell nfts-
Also the fact crypto + VR stuff still consumes a LOT of power 💀
@@anerrorhasoccurred8727SAME WITH ELECTRIC CARS theyre actually seriously energy inefficient, to the point where it harms the environment more to produce the electricity they run on than to just burn gas 😭
@@anerrorhasoccurred8727im not anti-electric cars tho, i just think they need to be much more efficient before they can actually be of any use. plus im anti-tesla and anti-elon musk
Buy less sustainable movement:...
Capitalism: yeah that ain't gonna work for me.
I love how this entire product design is based off having virtual clothes instead of real clothes, meanwhile every single ad they have is someone using it over their real clothes and having their actual clothes be extremely noticeable
Yeah. That is true.
Safiya Nygaard did a video about trying out these digital clothes a while ago. She definitely tried to actually style them. It was interesting.
"don't shop less, shop digital" is EXTREMELY insidious
What the world is dying from over consumption? Hmmmm that sounds like actually doing something about it could mean making less money. 😢 Won’t someone think of the poor poor ultra rich? I know! Let’s have just as much consumption but consume *nothing*, and we keep making money because that’s a goal that’ll never backfire ever 😊.
/s if it wasn’t obvious fuck all these techno-fetishists-green-capistalist-morons
Dude that dragon shirt is SICK AS FUCK, is it real??
underrated comment
Nikki im about to break your heart, NO IT'S NOT
its a filter!
ok
Lmao
I like the idea that instagram influencers would use AR clothes instead of doing Shein hauls and then throwing that shet away after 1 pic, but damn why are they sooooo expensive? like you said, it's still a filter and it doesn't solve a problem which is that people splurge on fast fashion because it's cheap and looks good in the photo. AR clothes are just doing a make -believe at this point trying to sell you smth that is 1. expensive 2. can't be worn irl 3. looks (questionable) in the photo / does not look good in a video
It's probably so expensive since there's still artists and designers behind the work, the clothes have to be modeled and rigged too. It's kinda silly sure, but if they're not hurting anyone I hardly see an issue. That's why the fact that they sell NFTs is the real issue here. You don't have to contribute to environmental destruction to put on some digital clothes.
It's like designer logo stuff, it's a way to show people you spent money
@@Fauna_CR yeah but I distinctly remember them making the claim that their goal is to fight fashion pollution, so what we have here instead is greenwashing. Also I work with people who make AR filters and I promise you none of those are worth a 100$. (Real) fashion costs so much because garment construction is a very complicated process which involves a lot more skill than creating an AR filter and a lot more resources, which is why designer items are so valuable. You can do whatever you want with your money though, my point is simply that the eco-friendly claims are bs and this is just another money grab.
In Safia Nygaard’s video, they actually photoshop the clothing onto your still images when you pay for them. The AR is the “free” version for people who won’t pay per edit. It’s still really silly, but they look better than just the AR ones
@@Fauna_CR someone else mentioned this in another comment, but some of their designs are actually stolen from other artists. The price would be one thing if they were paying actual designers and digital artists to make the clothes high quality and good looking, but if they’re stealing other people’s designs they have no excuse.
How many people actually THROW AWAY clothes after wearing them once?? Back when I was first getting into fashion in 8th grade, fast fashion was all I could afford--but many of those piece are still in my wardrobe five years later or have been handed down/sold at thrift stores @_@
Yeah, and at the least if you do come into money and pick up some newer clothes you can still donate the older ones or sell them on if they're worth it. I still have cheap clothes from like 8 years ago
@@Nyitemare Yes exactly!! Heck, I have a pair of shoes I bought in eighth grade for $5 and they still function perfectly years later 😂
@LunaNightshade lol more like 3rd world countries wouldn't have piles of garbage from 1st world countries excessive clothing consumption
I have a hoodie I bought when I was 16 and I’m 37 now. It’s still fine except it’s now more orange than red. And it wasn’t an expensive hoodie - I’m pretty sure I got it at Kmart. People are wild.
I know someone who throws clothes in the trash tote literally because of convenience. Because bagging them up and taking them to your local thift store (not goodwill because they suck) is too much work. But somehow they have all the time in the world to put up thousands of lights and shit around their house during the holidays. They are not the brightest crayon in the box obviously.
You know if everything wasn't made as gimmick to make a buck off people, this technology could actually be used for online clothes shopping. It could give you a rough idea on how it would look on you before you buy without all the negatives of trying out clothes in retail.
That would be so awesome.
But even then trying on clothes is a lot about seeing how the clothes feel on you, not just look
@@Pomegranatekthis is vr, I’m sure they can give you artificial feel
i've never appreciated good 3d modellers more than now. you guys in r/blender and in the industry youre amazing
Well there s a difference between someone who learned modelling software because they like it or need it for serious projects, vs when they dip their toes into such software as a secondary goal to making them stupid whimsical clothes
this reminds me that i need to start learning 3d modeling for gamedev again, thank you
@@silverblank1139 As if traditional couture designers don't also make them stupid whimsical clothes? Lmao
@@xr.melissa yeah but at least don't fuck with the laws of physics and optics (not in that way at least lol)
Lll
You are correct about them photoshopping the good looking photos because thats actually the business, the videos are just the app to let you 'see what they'd look like'... Which is worse because they charge by photo, so those dresses aren't over 100 dollars for a bad ar dress, they're 100 dollars for them to photoshop a model onto a picture you send them. PER PHOTO. And it's not even that good!
Safiya Nygaard did a real in depth video on this exact company and the results were. . . Like she tried to be positive and see both sides of it but yeah they are... not even that good at the photoshop.
Does that mean the people with videos paid thousands of dollars, for these people to frame by frame photoshop them???
@@tessarae9127 No, I’m pretty sure they don’t do videos for ”clients”, only photos. These videos are just to show what they look like on you. But it looks like the virtual clothes are like a filter if that makes sense. So it’s not photoshopped on frame by frame. I’m bad at explaining things, sorry
I haven't looked into this at all so I've no idea what I'm talking about - but I'm guessing they basically take your pic, build a scene in some 3D software that approximates what's in the pic (similar lighting, maybe some objects if you're lucky), pose a human model to match you and hang the clothes on it, and then composite the render with the original pic. There's a fair few hours' work in that, so if that's what they're charging for and not the snap filter, I guess that's not ~so~ bad? I mean I'm not sure how many people would actually want that and if the results aren't great, maybe they're not putting in ~that~ much work...
God I hate when people make videos trying to put a positive spin on garbage, its so disingenuous
I think Safiya Nygaard’s video about this is really interesting because she acknowledges some of the potential positives in the concept, like how it’s a way to explore fashion outside of the realm of reality and it could potentially make more extravagant clothing more accessible to be “worn” for people, but also talks about her issues with it, particularly the price and limited nature of it for that price, and how that kind of undermines the latter potential benefit.
++
Was looking to see if anyone had mentioned her video yet. It's definitely true that digital fashion can have interesting applications, but any benefits are pretty much undermined. I also didn't realise this company sells NFTs, so that counters basically any positive
The whole accessibility positive then is nulled it seems. The meta verse should be ad free.
I feel like this could be a useful app if it allowed you to “try on” clothes digitally before buying them. That should be their business model for something like this.
The funniest part is that if you buy it, they'll do the photoshopping of the pics you sent them, but if months later you want new pics you have to buy the whole outfit again. It's ridiculous. Safiya did a video on dressX
yeah, like
it doesn't solve the problem they want to fix..?
i wanna wear 'em again, brah!
Safiya Nygaard did a great video trying these, and the companies edit them into your photos for you but they still always end up looking off
+
i love how they unironically did the emperor's new clothes thing. hell on earth
Technically, these examples are AR (augmented reality) not VR (virtual reality). But to be the most accurate, they are just "digital" clothes because they can be used on any 3D platform. They're just 3D models.
i love just how poorly the vr is done,, like even that full body dora filter on tiktok works better
It’s almost ingenious, playing on this “fear” that VR will eventually replace EVERYTHING and we will be living like the people on the spaceship in Wall•E
i just hope im dead when that time comes
VR doesn't make sense with this product though. AR kind of does if somebody could get in inventing a pair of ar glasses that look cool and get universally adopted by the masses. Dunno why everybody is sleeping on AR.
@@strayiggytv Cuz its too expensive to be useful right now.
@@strayiggytv VR makes more sense than AR for this, adding another clothing model to a virtual world is easy and that's a thing people are already into. Getting something like this to work in AR without looking jank as hell is an incredibly complex problem!
ya know, as a kid I was told the story of the emperor's new clothes and I thought that both the emperor and the merchant scamming him were idiots because I believed that there was no way anybody would actually be dumb enough to buy fake clothes...
That girl at 7:48 ... Never seen a more pitiful attempt at hitting the whoa in my life
One of the best ones yet
i like it
Totalmente de acuerdo. Es cierto. Gracias. Saludos!!
Nice
Nice
Gud
I like the idea that a fashion group could photoshop their looks onto models so they can create looks that can’t be easily made in real life.
The fact that they sell it and expect people to buy it is pretty ridiculous. Why do people have to ruin good ideas?
@sokin jon huge thanks to this spam bot for copying my comment and using it to promote their virus porn website
@@atlashistorical they’re like an infestation
That's capitalism for you.
Thanks to depop sellers I can’t even afford to buy or FIND second hand clothes (disability assistance, I can’t order online), and some people are paying real life money for f a k e clothes? Being alive feels beyond lovecraftian at this point
Inb4 someone defends resellers… no. Also a lot of people legitimately consider going to a second hand store to be a DATE IDEA? Or just something to do when bored, or for DIY videos, a “new cheap outfit”, this stuff is hurting the people who are completely reliant on low income resources. If your stores aren’t getting emptied, be thankful
I get what you’re saying but I’ve never entered a thrift store and have it lacking clothing. Depop sellers aren’t great but let’s not act like there’s a shortage of donated clothing
I used to work in a thrift shop and resellers would snatch things out of employees and customer’s hands, load up a cart to keep it away from other customers l, unabashedly and publicly look up the resale value on items, and then put them back in the wrong spot if the profit margin isn’t high enough. They also stop employees carts mid-push, mess up the order of items the employee hasn’t put away yet, and in general make the employees (who are often hired through programs that help disabled people) jobs a lot harder
@@bunnyfrosting1744 Girly I like looking for clown dolls in the second-hand stores. Unless you know abt a dedicated clown shop you can't stop people from entering shit like Goodwill looking for things besides clothes. Also yes re-using things is good for the environment so whether low or high income is not the concern here.
@@Pixieee885 Depends entirely on where you live how much stock there is. The increase in resellers is also making thrift stores raise their prices.
3:40 the Skyrim reference while I’m actively logging into Skyrim is wild timing
6:50 pretty sure they make clip-on earrings to solve this problem
yeah
younger me cried over them
Yeah, but how are you gonna use a pair of cute, real clip-on earrings to flex on NFT fans on the internet?
😆 😞
Hi Chad Chad, happy fathers day.
I award you with father of the year. Here's your dad shirt, your dad chair, and your dad beer. Cheers.
don't forget the dad sodium
dad dad of the year.
Tie?
what about the dad cargo shorts with 1700000 pockets and the dad sandals???
@@pplaguerat9229 the dad socks too
5:54 “Let me introduce you to digital fashion” *turns into a fucking trash can*
That's where these clothes belong
@@hasbruh2987 u ain’t wrong tho
I wanted to like it but I didn’t want to ruin the like number
Oops
I know this video is kinda old but can we take a moment to appreciate the little things that chad chad includes in her videos?? like saying "if you can afford to" at 11:22 instead of just "don't shop fast fashion" to encourage people to do the right thing without putting pressure on people who actually can't. it's the little things like that that make such a big difference.
It is unfathomable that the marketing team validated these ads, like "hmm, yeah, hmmm, our product is really shining in this clip". Everything looks awful ! I mean, even a satire of digital clothing wouldn't look that bad in fear of being treated as "bad faith".
To me this is the same kinda shit as switching to compostable plastic cups to "save the environment". Yes I guess it's marginally better for the environment, but it still promotes the same culture of overconsumption that is closer to the root of the problem. Do we really think this VR fashion concept deters people from wanting more clothing for social media? Or does it just feed that mentality which will still drive people to buy fast fashion?
Yeah like,, the fact that it says “don’t shop less, shop virtual” is SO telling. Overconsumption is a huge issue and so many companies/influencers/etc try to greenwash themselves while still promoting it.
Plus just buy less, having virtual clothes is not the same as the pleasure of styling a real outfit, and you can’t materially use them, while compostable plastic cups are actually useful
Overconsumption isn't the problem, companies literally dumping billions of gallons of oil into the ocean and millions of tons of CO2 into the air, and literally nothing happening, is the problem.
Corporations could push for less consumption if they wanted to.
We're just living in the paradigm provided.
@@stitchfinger7678 well, yes you’re right, but I think corporations are pushing the current culture of overconsumption/consumerism, and have benefited from it for a while. Obviously the average person isn’t to blame, but what can we do against a corporation, especially one that has made itself necessary in our (I’m speaking from a North American perspective btw) society? The only thing to do is consume less, and vote. Even buying green, if bought mindlessly, will cause excess waste and damage (and so many companies greenwash that green products likely aren’t as green as implied).
Sometimes it’s just nice to do something easy to sleep at night. Like buying less, or using public transit. Nobody thinks that’ll save the world, or that it’s the only problem. Just that it’s *a* problem, and one of the only ones the average person can actually control. It doesn’t solve much, but apathy and a “no ethical consumption under capitalism, so why bother” attitude solves less. Idk I’m probably preaching to the choir here though.
How is producing compostable food items contributing to overconsumption lmao food is literally the ONE thing we will always need to consume daily. This example makes no sense
If people really want to make a difference and buy less real fashion, learning to mend clothes is super easy, super cheap and a great life skill!
But also Chad Chad every single one of your videos is a delight, please make more, thank you, you are glorious (and your corn virtual outfit is the very height of fashion).
Agree
Agreed, most of my clothes rip at the seems, so it’s really easy to fix them and make them even more durable
sewing machines are scary as fuck i'd rather just ask my mom to do it so i don't have to be near sharp objects
I've been a straight woman all my life, but when you put on that box my whole life changed.
i always love chad chad's goofy openings
goofy ahh opening
same lol
@Ciluk Bokhaiy bruh
@@rottingstarz quavante zingleton ahh openings
5:59 I'M SORRY, DID THAT SAY THAT DIGITAL CLOTHING PRODUCES 97% LESS CO2 THAN *ACTUAL CLOTHING*
omfg it does, guess we all need to only look at eachother through digital apps now so we're not wasting energy on clothing /s
Safiya Nygaard made a video about this and it seems that what you're really paying for is for someone to photoshop the clothes into a picture of you. And you may think "cool, 110$ dress is pricey but at least I can get a few cool pics out of it" but no, that's 110$ per use. And you pay for each piece in the picture even if it's just one picture. I think Safiya also had a few pics turn out badly photoshopped and wasn't able to get them redone without paying again.
Wait there isn't a "library" of dresses you own?
You RENT them each for 110$?
This chick is smart then. She knows how stupid her audience can be.
The only thing this can be useful is for designing, like seeing how clothes might fit and look on somebody while it's being designed. Like the clothes come later.
honestly the concept of vr clothes would actually be great for cinema, given that more time be put into making it stable. But also isn't that just what motion capture is? You can motion capture someone into a beast im pretty sure you can do the same with clothes already
Do all the time. A lot of modern films are more visual effects than they are actual footage. Marvel are especially well-known for this. You can tell it's CGI when you see people doing something that obviously isn't real like riding dinosaurs, but most of the effects in movies are simply because it's faster and cheaper to fix things in CGI than to film things perfectly. That can include changing an actor's clothing to make their pose more dramatic, or because the director decided they want to make a stylistic change to the wardrobe. Changing the outfit in visual effects can be cheaper than setting up the stage again to re-film a scene.
9:54 Sucha Chad move!
nay... such a Chad Chad move!
3:34
I expected a third, even MORE bass-boosted one here "No video games?"
Im super against fast fashion and literally throwing clothes away!! The only time they get tossed in the can is if they are destroyed beyond repair. If i can fix it, i do! And anything i or my fam doesnt wear anymore gets donated.
I've owned some of my clothes for over a decade, so I think I'll pass on "saving the environment" with digital clothing.
As far as I'm aware:
The choppy videos are from their free app, where you can try on the filters.
The final product (the photo) is what you're actually paying for. As far as I remember the price also includes the photoshopping price where the put it on your body (the actual final product).
Still a very dumb idea lol
Still incredibly stupid... lmao
Yes BUT the final product is still crappy, safyaa made a video about it
That’s still dumb though
@@dvalee never said it wasn't
Do y'all remember that tale about a naked king who got scammed and thought he was wearing cool clothes? That's him now
Yeah, and he was convinced only the wise can see the 'clothes' and since everybody wanted to keep their job, they confirmed the 'existance' of the clothes and even giving compliments. Didn't last very long when a child pointed out the fact that he's literally butt naked, showing his milimeter defeater for all to see.
"TikTok" and "VR" are two words I hoped would never cross over. Alas, here we are.
virtual fashion seems like a bit from a mid-2000s sci-fi sitcom (idk if that's actually a thing)
THOSE CLOTHES LOOK RIDICULOUS 😂😂😂 maybe there's an upside on not getting those clothes physically bc what tf is happening with that 03:57 pillow mess omg imagine wearing that outside
Chad: Dont eat clothes.
Moths: YOURE NOT MY MOM
I was fully distracted by the fact that I own that exact same shirt you're wearing... Which I'm pretty sure I bought 17 years ago at some random beachside store in Ontario. 😅 Somehow it still makes the cut after all these years.
Good taste never goes out of style
slow fashion at it's finest 👌🏼
0:47 That “not really” sign is making it seem like we’re being told to go take a bite out of our delicious, delicious shirts
you must resist the temptation
6:16 - your editing goofs always catch me off guard, the pinball sounds here killed me
"dont eat your clothes"
this is why I keep saying we should be making clothes out of fruit leather
“I have worn 67 digital outfits so far, that means I have saved 264,000 liters of water” you’re telling me that each outfit saves 3,940 liters of water? Yeah okay
The water usage to make an outfit is probably a lot higher than that. Cotton needs a lot of irrigation. It's still terrible math though, as it assumed that each digital outfit used is one real outfit not used. It's the same math that media companies use to explain why piracy is costing the economy trillions of dollars: Take the number of downloaded MP3 files, multiply by the retail value of an album on day of release, wave figure at lawmakers.
@@vylbird8014 me when people will be more likely to get things they don't care about for free instead of for not fe
Ree
it's also just, why even bring that up? the clothes were already made, buying a digital outfit isn't going to bring back the water used to make said clothes
@@vylbird8014 do you understand how the water cycle works, at all? Transpiration/evaporation- condensation, precipitation, repeat.
The water that goes into watering crops literally evaporates back into the atmosphere and rains down back into dams and reservoirs.
@@audreydoyle5268 Yes, but it doesn't rain back down in the places you want it. Fresh water will never run our, but each region only gets so many centimetres-per-year. In drier regions that isn't enough for the agriculture they run so it has to be supplemented with groundwater, which does run out.
I’m crying 😭💀lmao 7:32
L
💀mao
I saw NFT clothes like 6 months ago so this is child’s play. There was no way to get any lower than that.
hey your name is John Doe.
Wait a minute... 8:45 that's just future trunks but looking really weird!
10:15 I was just learning for finals and suddenly this absolute gigachad chad drops the name of my country, scared me shitless somehow
Succes met leren :)
@@my_name_might_be_Iris Thanks!
Ik had precies hetzelfde hahah
1:05 FINALLY i can walk aimlessly and confused looking like im supposed to be!
you are right, you’re paying the company to photoshop the clothes on you. they’re transparent about it it, it’s just a strange way to advertise overpriced photoshop services tbh
6:08 I genuinely don’t know the last time I laughed this hard. I literally was yelling in my laugh because of how funny this was. Props, this is amazing.
11:18, more box rubbing then I saw in my life.
Father’s Day isn’t the best day for me because my father sucks so thank you for making my day so much better and for being amazing
@Ciluk Bokhaiy bot
Chad Chad? Uh more like Dad Dad amirite
I’m so proud of you and how far you’ve come dude. You deserve every single joy and happiness I thought about you a lot today and I just wanted you to know how thankful I am for you. Your videos saved me and gave me a piece of my personality I thought I had lost. Thank you always I hope you see this and do something silly stupid fun ❤️❤️
Jesus.
@@safiya5185 maul
"big cheese does not want you to be naked" is the kind of content i really enjoy, im subscribing
8:20 Hey, I'm a genius so I can solve the clothing waste issue! No, hear me out, I know it's crazy, but; maybe just buy less, wear clothes more than once or for one day, donate old clothes rather than throwing them in the garbage. If they get torn, still not garbage; those are dish rags and patch material for still functioning clothes. I'm 30, and I haven't bought a shirt in atleast a decade. Got some as gifts inbetween then, sure, but same rules apply.
4:43 yes, they are editing! a youtuber (i forgot who) ordered some "clothes" and the company basically photoshopped the photos
Safiya nygaard I think
@@hannahheeeh Yeah
didnt danny (gonzalez) get some too?
1:50 I've never seen anyone mention this movie before !! Childhood memories
This is making me scream internally but also laughing out loud because of how funny you are. Thank you for making me laugh so much about this 😂
11:06 rocking that bread 😩
True 😍
The environmentalist messaging works if you're literally braindead and never think about it, which I can only imagine is what they expected.
Chad Chad is literally the best. Never felt so entertained while feeling my life is spiraling out of control.
"This feels like Where's Waldo if Waldo was 5 times bigger than everyone else and kept glitching off of the page."
I laughed so hysterically hard the air left my body. I died. I am dead.
I love how she used classical music instead of the copyrighted tik tok songs
learning how to sew is really great bc as a plus sized person, even if you can find "your size" in stores, 80% of the time it doesn't actually fit, also don't buy fabric at craft stores, get stuff online if you can. Infinitely cheaper and probably better quality
When I first saw these “clothes” I just thought they were clothing concepts for a video game. You cant even imagine my disappointment when I found out their not
I love how in the Water Dress add she just point to some random blank spot on the screen.
Infact, all these ads are just off putting enough to be cringey. Like that one where it looks like she is repeatedly "Missing the Whoa."
so glad i found her channel
she's one of the few youtubers that are still funny 🥲