Dame 6. Fledder 6. Fallen knight 5? 😂 🤦🏻♂️ BC =Bullshit council. Kaer Trolde should be 12, too. Reavers needs to have a couple of the cards that spam it Nerfd so there's less spamming chance.
Well if I would play Jacque first, I would gain two coins but I would lose 2 points from the fallen knight so the result would be the same but I would risk a gold spender :) also I was joking about tie due to balance council :D
@@Bomblinum, no, I think there's a misunderstanding. If you'd played Jacques as your second to last card then congregation as the last, you'd have gained a coin from congregation which you could've spent with Jacques. Playing Whoreson first and Knight second was the correct decision.
nice to see firesworn type back
29:05 straciłeś 1 monetę.
They can dodge some control now but the fallen knights were damn good ever since
Dame 6. Fledder 6. Fallen knight 5? 😂 🤦🏻♂️ BC =Bullshit council. Kaer Trolde should be 12, too. Reavers needs to have a couple of the cards that spam it Nerfd so there's less spamming chance.
Indeed, all the spamming archetypes should be severely nerfed
It works pretty well :)
No you tied because you didn't play jacques first and get the bonus coin/fee
Well if I would play Jacque first, I would gain two coins but I would lose 2 points from the fallen knight so the result would be the same but I would risk a gold spender :) also I was joking about tie due to balance council :D
@@Bomblinjakbyś stracił na rycerzu. Przeciwnik by wygrał jakby sierzanat boostowa, więc missplaye z obu stron.
@@Bomblin najpierw rycerz. Jakub i kongregacja na końcu.
@@Bomblinum, no, I think there's a misunderstanding. If you'd played Jacques as your second to last card then congregation as the last, you'd have gained a coin from congregation which you could've spent with Jacques. Playing Whoreson first and Knight second was the correct decision.
it also looks like the opponent was scared you had geralt lol, he missed out on 2 points for not boosting a soldier.