Wait, 3 of my favorite youtubers? Together? Sweet! 😃 Thanks a bunch, Fraser! That was fun!!! But I voted for the Carina Nebula... And it's not even my favorite! It would be the Southern Ring Nebula! Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
Was wondering when a collab with Anton was going to happen! Both you guys are goated journolists . Best place for Recent, reliable and relevant Space news! Learned So much i didn't know. Your Videos are Rarely the same topic simply re-hashed. Unless there is a new scientific paper in that feild of science. worth talking about. Keep up the good work!
@@frasercain28:00 seeing nebulae in real time is one thing , but seing details in a nebula is significantly harder , and that's the aspect that astrophotography is for . . and I often see these two wiews clumped together and as a nitpicker that anoys me because I know these are not quite the same
I noticed that three of the finalist images had a symmetry to them, with the pillars standing out as the only one without a type of symmetry. The Phantom Galaxy is beautifully symmetrical and has that awesome eldritch color which is why I'm not at all surprised it won. I literally looked at it for five minutes when I first saw it a few months ago. Great work from the engineers, scientists and artists that bring all these beautiful images to us.
Tbh i think you could see way more than what you see right now, if we wouldnt have all this light pollution, no matter where you are , the sky will never be as dark as it would be without any artificial lighting.
bahaha astronomy grinch. facts. makes it fun to come up wild gripes just to poke him. aw but he's a keeper at that same point I kept thinking, well even if it IS like the milky way in the sky; Andromeda is much less edge-on right? it would be a BIT cooler. poor joe haha
@@benjaminbeard3736 all of them have their patter voice for super clarity when making scripted talks. Antons seems to be the most different. I'm guessing he developed it to work through his English.
The comments of Joe Scott are mind-blowing: "okay", "uh-uh" and "right" stuck with me XD I still love that he's out there doing educational work. Much love admiration and sympathy to Anton :D thank you for doing this with them Fraser.
I didn't know about Joe before now....but Anton!!! One of my absolute FAVORITES!!! Im watching the full stream now...will edit further....as needed ! 🤟 Here's my votes...and if i was "right" or not...in case anyone cares... Rnd 1 - 2 - ❌️ Rnd 2 - 1 - ❌️ Rnd 3 - 2 - ✅️ Rnd 4 - 1 - ❌️ SemiFinal - 1 - 2 - ❌️ SemiFinal - 2 - 2 - ❌️ Final - 4 - ❌️ Well folks that's all from me .... been a helluva show !!! I absolutely loved this collaboration !!! You must do something like this again!!! 🤟
Great video guys. Love hearing all the different backgrounds and explanations and how you talk about the images. I'm amazed by the amount of details that JWST har been able to present in so short time already.
19:57 imagine what this looks like from a planet surface. I spend so much time trying to imagine the night sky on planets in these systems (if they exist)
As a photographer, I liked the one that won best. It's intricate, symmetrical, and high contrast with the shimmering silver spiral wrapping around the shimmering sapphire blue core, against a deep black background. It may not be the most scientifically intriguing, but is definitely the most visually impressive.
Mr. Cain uses the word picture instead of photo, photograph or image. I say he's wrong because a picture is painted and a photo is taken. What say you?
@@garysimon7765 I've never really thought about it. I guess as long as we know what he's intending, that's fine. If someone says "I took a picture of an epic sunset" I don't immediately assume that they stole a painting lol.
This was a fun episode. I've been watching Anton every day for several years, you for a few months (as well as reading weekly newsletter), but I didn't know about Joe Scott. Definitely going to subscribe and check him out.
I didn't get to vote but for round 1, I would pick number 2. It was astounding to see for the first time. I want to know more about number 1 and I don't understand enough about it but want to learn more. Number 3 actually scared me when I first saw it. #4 is amazing both visually and in seeing the baby stars and the spaces they create. I would have picked #4 as my second choice.
That first image in the second batch with the binary star system, that's not a spiral. It looks more like IMMENSE ripples. I am assuming if we were able to turn that on its side and see a cross section of it, it would look like waves.
The galaxies are common but there are so many images, the best of the galaxy images it the best from a much larger group than planetary images. I think we need to picture the best by category or some type.
4:52 a quesiton about this image: are the dark patches on either side of the disk caused by the lack of dust/particles or is it a shadow caused by the accretion disk itself?
lol Anton, you're reactions. don't worry haha. I think you have just seen a million more galaxies than us fan-level astronerds. can't speak for everyone but I reckon us simple bumpkins just think spirals are cool and the depth perspective is.. idk about "unique" but very striking
What's interesting about the Jupiter image is that it looks like what you would see on a very small scale in fluid dynamics. All the turbulence patterns. Do we know what causes these patterns on Jupiter?
I'm not really into either of their content, but I do appreciate the opposition of their personalities and interests in the context of this tournament/challenge. Cool collab
I would have picked #2 (QF 1) as it has so many different visual representations of galactic evolutions, I could look at it for hours. I mean come on, gravitational lensing on massive scales here! ;O)- I''ll agree with Anton on QF 2. #1 is an amazing & unique phenomenon. QF 3 would have to be #2 as again, I'm drawn toward wide range images for more perspectives of cosmology and physics.. and it's beautiful. And for QF 4, again for the same reason, #2. Besides, Orion makes a great Cat necklace. ;O)-
5:27: My wow moment was seeing _The Weirdly Red Thing_ in the first ever image from a technical release-they'd just aligned the telescope mirrors and taken these images to, essentially, showcase it. This one was an analogue of the Hubble's famous Deep Field; the stunning difference was that JWST had all this light collected in just 12 hours! It was released as a larger image, coloured in more orange tones, and the centre of attention was that star with the eight hallmark JWST spikes. It was a stunning PR image indeed, and Fraser was entirely correct: that first image, processed from the same dataset, was presented by the President. But I… I ignored the star, I looked at the myriads after myriads of galaxies in it, and thought to myself that this was the first ever dataset which had these galaxies captured. Hundreds of galaxies seen for the first time ever! I lost myself for a whole hour in the image. Then it grabbed my attention: _The Weirdly Red Thing._ It's there on the SMACS image too. You wouldn't miss it at 5:27 directly to the right of the upper right corner of the box that Fraser had stuffed Joe in. It's possibly a high-z galaxy. It's was its colour indeed that dumbstruck me: in both image renditions, the spectrum long-to-short monotonicity is preserved: it's the reddest speckle even in infrared data. I was in awe thinking of the distance to this object-and it was right there! in the very first press image from the new instrument! already revealing the unseen, unimaginable depths of the ancient young Universe!!! It could be a relatively nearby very red or, more likely, brown dwarf photobombing; only its spectrum could tell. If so, it would probably be the faintest directly imaged brown dwarf. Even though they are a dozen for a halfpenny in our Galaxy, many millions of them, they're ordinarily too faint to see. To bring up a spectral comparison, the star at the centre is in fact a nearby red dwarf, and it came out blue in this image, shifted into the visible range. The object, whatever it be, is indeed very, very red! Yeah, by now, we have light from a few of incredibly red and ancient galaxies captured by JWST, but imagine seeing The Redness for the first time, in the first ever released press image. THAT was a truly striking moment!
Surprised I didn't hear (yet) least-photo-shopped as a criteria. Fiery hourglass is tinted red fine, but at least not multiple colours. Also it's beautiful and illustrates one thing *perfectly* being the jets streaming away from the disc at perpendicular angles. Clear winner in the 1st round!
I wonder if there are any animals on Earth that have good enough eyes to see Andromeda? Some of these nocturnal critters must see some amazing skies. Pit Vipers see infra red too but probably not good enough to help
In the WR140 image, the the dual star tree rings image, are we just lucky that the orbital plane is near a right angle to our direction of view and we are not looking side-on.
A really brilliant video...and yes you are correct (at least in my case)...🪐 I am subscribed to both Anton and Joe's channel🛸...it's been great with three of you...thank you Fraser...Cheers from Scotland🌍🌠
For me I have the most difficulty appreciating the size of these objects. Planets and stars ok, but when you talk about nebulas and galaxies and things like the pillars of creation I’m like where are these? In or out of the Milky Way? Can we see these kinds of objects in other galaxies?
I think i was sorta underwhelmed by the pictures of planets in our own galaxy. I guess i just thought webb would be able to take way clearer images of them since they are closer to us.
I pick number three on the first four (or set). Because the microstructure of galactic tendrils of gas. Between galactic arms hasn't ever been seen in minute detail before from a face on (non barred) spiral. Gasious, star forming galactic structure we still know little about. The insane resolution of JWST is on full display, here.
35:05 Stephan name pronunciation: Édouard Stephan was as French as anyone could only be, and the name is traditionally stressed on the last syllable “ste-FAN,” as it would be in French when stressed at all. I've seen incorrect spelling of the name even at the NASA Hubble's website, which called him “Edouard M. Stephan;” his correct full name is Édouard Jean-Marie Stephan. FWIW, he discovered the “quintet” in the 1870s, most likely with the famous 80cm first ever coated-mirror reflector, built by Foucault himself (the instrument had been in operation for nearly 100 years. until the late 1960s!) at _observatoire de Marseille,_ which Stephan was director of at the time.
I’d love to see an interview with Sean Carroll from Fraser about fundamental physics and Sean’s opinions. It’s a little off topic for the channel but Fraser is such a fantastic interviewer, and Sean such a fantastic communicator, that I think it would be epic.
Hey fraser awesome video. Just in case you can respond me. When you showed SMACS 0723 picture I was wondering...could you calculate what percentage of the sky is that picture? I know we cant see it with our naked eye, but knowing this data would give me a little idea of the vastness of the universe.
Hey, how did I miss THIS collab‽‽ I love Anton, and my eldest son I lost a few months ago NEVER missed an episode! I'll have to make sure I'm subbed to Joe, too. 😊
Fraser, if a nebula is opaque enough to prevent a telescope seeing the stars behind it, doesn't that mean that it would be opaque to the naked eye. If a telescope with a long exposure can't see any photons from behind it, how does the human eye have any chance to see what is behind it. Seeing it glow is a harder challenge. I expect that properly placed bright star(s) should make it possible to see something. Still nothing like the photos.
Thanks for organizing this, Fraser
Great work guys 🖖
You guys must do it again sometime!
My wife bought me a Wonderful Person t-shirt!
Anton, you need to do more live streams. You are a funny guy and people will love your live streams.
Your pronunciation is often better on this Anton, than at times your own vlog programme?
Wait, 3 of my favorite youtubers? Together? Sweet! 😃
Thanks a bunch, Fraser! That was fun!!!
But I voted for the Carina Nebula... And it's not even my favorite! It would be the Southern Ring Nebula!
Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
Wow! My three favorite astronomy related youtubers together! Instant like!
We're just missing Dr Paul Matt Sutter
Funny to me because. This guy I dont like.
That was a fun collab, hope to see them come back sometime :)
No way this is a dope colab I literally watch them both almost daily
This was a nice surprise! I watch Anton's videos every day. The man is prolific. Thanks a lot. Looking forward to Round 2.
Sure. But Joe and Fraiser do it also very well.
You had me the moment i saw Anton's picture in the thumbnail, this guy is amazing.
Hello wonderful person, I feel the Same lol,
Anton: goes all science nerd on it.
Joe: it's purdy
Was wondering when a collab with Anton was going to happen! Both you guys are goated journolists . Best place for Recent, reliable and relevant Space news! Learned So much i didn't know. Your Videos are Rarely the same topic simply re-hashed. Unless there is a new scientific paper in that feild of science. worth talking about. Keep up the good work!
I purposefully don't watch Anton's stuff so I don't accidentally get inspired by him.
@@frasercain28:00 seeing nebulae in real time is one thing , but seing details in a nebula is significantly harder , and that's the aspect that astrophotography is for . . and I often see these two wiews clumped together and as a nitpicker that anoys me because I know these are not quite the same
Asking for a favorite jwst image is like asking for your favorite science presenter from the three that were on the show today.
I noticed that three of the finalist images had a symmetry to them, with the pillars standing out as the only one without a type of symmetry. The Phantom Galaxy is beautifully symmetrical and has that awesome eldritch color which is why I'm not at all surprised it won. I literally looked at it for five minutes when I first saw it a few months ago. Great work from the engineers, scientists and artists that bring all these beautiful images to us.
Fraser the astronomy grinch. I was really looking forward to seeing Andromeda grow over the next few billion years.
Tbh i think you could see way more than what you see right now, if we wouldnt have all this light pollution, no matter where you are , the sky will never be as dark as it would be without any artificial lighting.
bahaha astronomy grinch. facts. makes it fun to come up wild gripes just to poke him. aw but he's a keeper
at that same point I kept thinking, well even if it IS like the milky way in the sky; Andromeda is much less edge-on right? it would be a BIT cooler. poor joe haha
I love hearing Anton's conversational voice ❤
His cadence was quite a bit quicker and he was more animated. It was cool to see.
@@benjaminbeard3736 all of them have their patter voice for super clarity when making scripted talks. Antons seems to be the most different. I'm guessing he developed it to work through his English.
Welcome Wonderful People! ^.^
The comments of Joe Scott are mind-blowing: "okay", "uh-uh" and "right" stuck with me XD I still love that he's out there doing educational work. Much love admiration and sympathy to Anton :D thank you for doing this with them Fraser.
Anton, nice for you to join us from outer space
The results are beside the point here for me, my happiness was watching such amazing people that I respect so much hang out! Thanks for this, Frazer!!
I didn't know about Joe before now....but Anton!!! One of my absolute FAVORITES!!!
Im watching the full stream now...will edit further....as needed ! 🤟
Here's my votes...and if i was "right" or not...in case anyone cares...
Rnd 1 - 2 - ❌️
Rnd 2 - 1 - ❌️
Rnd 3 - 2 - ✅️
Rnd 4 - 1 - ❌️
SemiFinal - 1 - 2 - ❌️
SemiFinal - 2 - 2 - ❌️
Final - 4 - ❌️
Well folks that's all from me .... been a helluva show !!! I absolutely loved this collaboration !!! You must do something like this again!!! 🤟
Awesome to get you 3 on one vid!!
Great video guys. Love hearing all the different backgrounds and explanations and how you talk about the images. I'm amazed by the amount of details that JWST har been able to present in so short time already.
19:57 imagine what this looks like from a planet surface. I spend so much time trying to imagine the night sky on planets in these systems (if they exist)
3 of my favorite TH-camrs on the same screen.
A rare footage of Joe and Anton talking to someone other than audience
Wonderful Anton on thumbnail for extra click ofc
As a photographer, I liked the one that won best. It's intricate, symmetrical, and high contrast with the shimmering silver spiral wrapping around the shimmering sapphire blue core, against a deep black background. It may not be the most scientifically intriguing, but is definitely the most visually impressive.
Mr. Cain uses the word picture instead of photo, photograph or image.
I say he's wrong because a picture is painted and a photo is taken. What say you?
@@garysimon7765 I've never really thought about it. I guess as long as we know what he's intending, that's fine. If someone says "I took a picture of an epic sunset" I don't immediately assume that they stole a painting lol.
What a treat od a video! :) i feel like i am at a gallery, being expertly informed about what is actually, phisically happening in the painting
But still keeping our own internal score :)
Some of my favorite YTers in one video! 🧡
I picked the winner! I went for what I thought was pretty.
Edit: great show. Loved all your guest’s comments too.
This was a fun episode. I've been watching Anton every day for several years, you for a few months (as well as reading weekly newsletter), but I didn't know about Joe Scott. Definitely going to subscribe and check him out.
The only 3 TH-camrs that I haven't missed a video from in years! Great video :)
This was a phenomenal video! Thank you guys so much for all the breakdowns, fun AND educational! 🎉
44:38 impressive self control was displayed at this moment.
No one even flinched at the full view of the ring of uranus.
Impressive sight!
49:36 the steely reserve didn't last
How could we?
@@frasercain you tried, we can't ask more than that lol
This was fun.
Producer Anton: you’re awesome dude
Agreed, he's been a welcome addition to the team. :-)
Omg more Wonderful people!!
This really was fun. Great to see Anton laugh!
Yeah, he's had a rough time recently...
no body has to die
no body has to...but...
*sips*
*treat yourself*
I didn't get to vote but for round 1, I would pick number 2. It was astounding to see for the first time. I want to know more about number 1 and I don't understand enough about it but want to learn more. Number 3 actually scared me when I first saw it. #4 is amazing both visually and in seeing the baby stars and the spaces they create. I would have picked #4 as my second choice.
The only thing missing is the other TH-camr. You know who SHE is and she would have added giddy enthusiasm and Oxfordian perspective :)
I'm not sure that she is at Fraser's "Becky" and call 😛
I went for Pillars 😊
Cool review. I voted for Pillars, though.
Sick! A crossover episode.
And here my heart raced at space daddies with hexes. Dare you play TI internet world?
That first image in the second batch with the binary star system, that's not a spiral. It looks more like IMMENSE ripples. I am assuming if we were able to turn that on its side and see a cross section of it, it would look like waves.
I've never seen Anton in such a casual setting before. Awesome.
If we were to re-take these images in say 5 years time, in the same way etc. Would we be able to see changes in positions of the objects?
Well that was fun! Thank you guys.
Anton's voice sounds a lot different when he's talking conversationally!
Why does JWST not take video? Exposure times make it impossible or something?
The galaxies are common but there are so many images, the best of the galaxy images it the best from a much larger group than planetary images. I think we need to picture the best by category or some type.
Cool collab! I was so excited to watch this
4:52 a quesiton about this image: are the dark patches on either side of the disk caused by the lack of dust/particles or is it a shadow caused by the accretion disk itself?
I LOVE the three of you guys!!!
Love ❤ all 3 channels.
lol Anton, you're reactions. don't worry haha. I think you have just seen a million more galaxies than us fan-level astronerds.
can't speak for everyone but I reckon us simple bumpkins just think spirals are cool and the depth perspective is.. idk about "unique" but very striking
That was soooooo much fun!
We had fun making it too.
I've been subscribed to you guys for a long time except for Anton and now I'm subscribed to him.
Oh, fantastic. More spacey news in the feed.
Anton is the shiznit.
i love the phantom galaxy because the whilepool like structure gives it a lot of motion which sucks you in.
Yeah, and it's looks so different from anything else we've seen.
i actually have two on my phone as a background already.
Great videos love watching
What's interesting about the Jupiter image is that it looks like what you would see on a very small scale in fluid dynamics. All the turbulence patterns. Do we know what causes these patterns on Jupiter?
I'm not really into either of their content, but I do appreciate the opposition of their personalities and interests in the context of this tournament/challenge. Cool collab
My favorite 3 TH-camrs in one video! Thanks Fraser!
Ohh wow!!! A lot of wonderful persons!!!!!!!
Enjoy!
@@frasercain im suscribing but bring em together again please haha
I think people picked the final image because it's like eye candy!
What a great collaboration. I feel like I want to have a fun pub night out with you 3 and talk about all things Universe. Drinks on me!
All the lads!
I would have picked #2 (QF 1) as it has so many different visual representations of galactic evolutions, I could look at it for hours.
I mean come on, gravitational lensing on massive scales here! ;O)-
I''ll agree with Anton on QF 2. #1 is an amazing & unique phenomenon.
QF 3 would have to be #2 as again, I'm drawn toward wide range images for more perspectives of cosmology and physics.. and it's beautiful.
And for QF 4, again for the same reason, #2. Besides, Orion makes a great Cat necklace. ;O)-
Thats the kind of wholesome content i need right now! ❤
5:27: My wow moment was seeing _The Weirdly Red Thing_ in the first ever image from a technical release-they'd just aligned the telescope mirrors and taken these images to, essentially, showcase it. This one was an analogue of the Hubble's famous Deep Field; the stunning difference was that JWST had all this light collected in just 12 hours! It was released as a larger image, coloured in more orange tones, and the centre of attention was that star with the eight hallmark JWST spikes. It was a stunning PR image indeed, and Fraser was entirely correct: that first image, processed from the same dataset, was presented by the President. But I… I ignored the star, I looked at the myriads after myriads of galaxies in it, and thought to myself that this was the first ever dataset which had these galaxies captured. Hundreds of galaxies seen for the first time ever! I lost myself for a whole hour in the image. Then it grabbed my attention: _The Weirdly Red Thing._ It's there on the SMACS image too. You wouldn't miss it at 5:27 directly to the right of the upper right corner of the box that Fraser had stuffed Joe in. It's possibly a high-z galaxy. It's was its colour indeed that dumbstruck me: in both image renditions, the spectrum long-to-short monotonicity is preserved: it's the reddest speckle even in infrared data. I was in awe thinking of the distance to this object-and it was right there! in the very first press image from the new instrument! already revealing the unseen, unimaginable depths of the ancient young Universe!!!
It could be a relatively nearby very red or, more likely, brown dwarf photobombing; only its spectrum could tell. If so, it would probably be the faintest directly imaged brown dwarf. Even though they are a dozen for a halfpenny in our Galaxy, many millions of them, they're ordinarily too faint to see. To bring up a spectral comparison, the star at the centre is in fact a nearby red dwarf, and it came out blue in this image, shifted into the visible range. The object, whatever it be, is indeed very, very red! Yeah, by now, we have light from a few of incredibly red and ancient galaxies captured by JWST, but imagine seeing The Redness for the first time, in the first ever released press image. THAT was a truly striking moment!
Surprised I didn't hear (yet) least-photo-shopped as a criteria. Fiery hourglass is tinted red fine, but at least not multiple colours. Also it's beautiful and illustrates one thing *perfectly* being the jets streaming away from the disc at perpendicular angles. Clear winner in the 1st round!
I wonder if there are any animals on Earth that have good enough eyes to see Andromeda? Some of these nocturnal critters must see some amazing skies. Pit Vipers see infra red too but probably not good enough to help
hello wonderful persons
Anton sounds so different when he’s talking normally as opposed to when he’s presenting things on his videos, lol.
I chose :
Pillars (1st)
Jupiter (1st)
Rho (2nd)
Neptune (4th)
Already subscribed to all three… this collaboration makes me happy 😃
In the WR140 image, the the dual star tree rings image, are we just lucky that the orbital plane is near a right angle to our direction of view and we are not looking side-on.
These images makes me wonder what we look like from distant exo-beings
Three favorite youtubers in one video! Awesome!
Anton is truly a wonderful person ⛳
I noticed the links to Anton's and Joe's channels are swapped in the video description.
A really brilliant video...and yes you are correct (at least in my case)...🪐
I am subscribed to both Anton and Joe's channel🛸...it's been great with three of you...thank you Fraser...Cheers from Scotland🌍🌠
For me I have the most difficulty appreciating the size of these objects. Planets and stars ok, but when you talk about nebulas and galaxies and things like the pillars of creation I’m like where are these? In or out of the Milky Way? Can we see these kinds of objects in other galaxies?
I think i was sorta underwhelmed by the pictures of planets in our own galaxy. I guess i just thought webb would be able to take way clearer images of them since they are closer to us.
I pick number three on the first four (or set). Because the microstructure of galactic tendrils of gas. Between galactic arms hasn't ever been seen in minute detail before from a face on (non barred) spiral. Gasious, star forming galactic structure we still know little about. The insane resolution of JWST is on full display, here.
35:05 Stephan name pronunciation: Édouard Stephan was as French as anyone could only be, and the name is traditionally stressed on the last syllable “ste-FAN,” as it would be in French when stressed at all. I've seen incorrect spelling of the name even at the NASA Hubble's website, which called him “Edouard M. Stephan;” his correct full name is Édouard Jean-Marie Stephan. FWIW, he discovered the “quintet” in the 1870s, most likely with the famous 80cm first ever coated-mirror reflector, built by Foucault himself (the instrument had been in operation for nearly 100 years. until the late 1960s!) at _observatoire de Marseille,_ which Stephan was director of at the time.
I’d love to see an interview with Sean Carroll from Fraser about fundamental physics and Sean’s opinions. It’s a little off topic for the channel but Fraser is such a fantastic interviewer, and Sean such a fantastic communicator, that I think it would be epic.
Oh wait there was one interview 3 years ago. I gotta watch that!!
Yeah, I interviewed him a few years ago. I'm sure we'll hang out again some time soon.
Plot twist, they're actually eliminating these celestial objects but we won't know for thousands of years
So is all the matter in these galaxies spiraling down into the black hole as if it were water down a drain? That's what it looks like.
4 was my pick. The Pillars of Creation is my all time favorite
Hey fraser awesome video. Just in case you can respond me. When you showed SMACS 0723 picture I was wondering...could you calculate what percentage of the sky is that picture? I know we cant see it with our naked eye, but knowing this data would give me a little idea of the vastness of the universe.
i love anton i watch him evry night cool science facts every night keeps my brain happy
How is Anton have time to do this? He makes like thirty videos a week.
It was midnight for him when we recorded.
@@frasercain it was a fun video. Really nice idea.
Wait, you got Joe on here!? No way, man! I'm in...
That was fun. Thanks.
Hey, how did I miss THIS collab‽‽ I love Anton, and my eldest son I lost a few months ago NEVER missed an episode! I'll have to make sure I'm subbed to Joe, too. 😊
I didn’t expect Jupiter to win either. It’s basically Jupiter with different wavelengths, aka different colors
Fraser, if a nebula is opaque enough to prevent a telescope seeing the stars behind it, doesn't that mean that it would be opaque to the naked eye. If a telescope with a long exposure can't see any photons from behind it, how does the human eye have any chance to see what is behind it.
Seeing it glow is a harder challenge. I expect that properly placed bright star(s) should make it possible to see something. Still nothing like the photos.
Quarterfinal round 3 Carina nebula has been my phone's wallpaper since the image was released
It’s sadistic! Twisted wanton inflicting of suffering 😄😅✨.