Feels like a university education on TH-cam. I completed my MA in psych but never did I witness a lecture series like this. Makes me sad to realize how impoverished psychological studies are today without an indepth view of psychoanalysis.
I also studied psychology in college and went on to do research work in the field, however like you I never saw, heard or read anything as succinct or comprehensive as this lecture.
Whoever says: There is no "inner life" is an impostor! In fact, it would be interesting to reflect upon: Which kind of Culture would generate this kind of individual/thought?
This guy is super educated. I did my MA Thesis on the history of Psychoanalysis as a concept and idea. It would have been a dream to have this guy as my supervisor. Hands down for this lecture....
He even talks about me: The person who had a suppressed or underdeveloped Id and has intellectualized everything since the page of three or four. Brilliant, brilliant presentation!
Great talk, though I would argue that in the ancient world there was a deep concern with character traits and virtue ethics. Personality theory actively avoided the term ‘character’ due to the moral dimensions of the ancients, and later with positive psychology we saw a return to it. Though one can see a focus on personality in Aristotle and others, along with an attempt to shape these traits via behaviour and ‘spiritual’ exercises.
Thank you very much for these inspiring, educating and entertaining lectures. There are still "socialist psychoanalysts", not so much in clinical psychoanalysis but in the cultural field: Slavoj Žižek is by far the most famous of them. Lacanian and edgy
Freud credited Sabina in the footnotes, the translator/publisher of the English editions decided not to translate the footnotes. 1:16:19 It's so upsetting that 1. Sabina was forgotten. 2. Freud is being accused of stealing her ideas when he did no such thing and gave her full credit
Great lecture! Thank you! I came across this video when was looking for a comprehensive overwiew of main psychological theories, so it was a great founding!
This is a truly outstanding presentation. My only comments are that Jacques Lacan should have fit in somewhere; and that Franz Brentano clearly never owned a cat.
A misunderstanding of the notion of intentionality in this lecture, otherwise extremely informative and well-structured. The concept of intentionality as revived from the scholastics by brentano is not the capacity of the mind to have intentions but rather the ‘about ness’ of mental states, I.e their capacity to refer to things.
I might be wrong - or I did not understand your explanation - but Archetypes are a cross-cultural "phenomena" translated to "our national/tribal culture". They are not generated separately in each culture. They are Common in "essence". The translation is not the Archetype. The translation belongs to a certain Culture but the Archetypes belong to OUR Culture. Check this... Obrigado!
Excellent lecture, i do however disagree about the notion of this as the first personality theory and also the notion of ancient disinterest in personalit on the grounds of Galenos work on bodily fluids and "characters".
Feels like a university education on TH-cam. I completed my MA in psych but never did I witness a lecture series like this. Makes me sad to realize how impoverished psychological studies are today without an indepth view of psychoanalysis.
I also studied psychology in college and went on to do research work in the field, however like you I never saw, heard or read anything as succinct or comprehensive as this lecture.
Agree. The presenter is smooth. The content and deliver together are just brilliant!
Whoever says: There is no "inner life" is an impostor!
In fact, it would be interesting to reflect upon: Which kind of Culture would generate this kind of individual/thought?
Thank you very much for your thorough work.
@@ronaldoferreira594 walking zombies man
This guy is super educated. I did my MA Thesis on the history of Psychoanalysis as a concept and idea. It would have been a dream to have this guy as my supervisor. Hands down for this lecture....
This guy is SO good. He expresses both the material and his thoughts about the material with amazing clarity.
These are seriously the best talks. Brilliantly done. Filming in Blank and white an artful, yet, un distracting touch.
Thanks for the wide sweeping history and for pointing out the important contributions of each viewpoint from the beginning to now. Fascinating!
This guy is EXTRAORDINARILY KNOWLEDGEABLE. Really a surprise!
Thank you Dr Aleksandar and Stillpoint for this super lecture series.
Great Lecture , Amazing Lecture , Fantastic Lecture and so on and so on.....
He even talks about me: The person who had a suppressed or underdeveloped Id and has intellectualized everything since the page of three or four. Brilliant, brilliant presentation!
Ha, I was thinking the same thing. Does anyone know if this phenomenon has a name and where I can read more about it?
(Description starts at 31:50)
Thanks for posting this! Been loving listening to these lectures every morning.
The instructor is very knowledgeable.
Really enjoy these! thanks for uploading
Excellent lecture. Thank you so much for sharing this. very altruistic and generous. A real help to my study of Psychoanalysis.
Great talk, though I would argue that in the ancient world there was a deep concern with character traits and virtue ethics. Personality theory actively avoided the term ‘character’ due to the moral dimensions of the ancients, and later with positive psychology we saw a return to it. Though one can see a focus on personality in Aristotle and others, along with an attempt to shape these traits via behaviour and ‘spiritual’ exercises.
Can we have an in depth series of all the theories about Psychology!
This is amazing!
Thank you very much for these inspiring, educating and entertaining lectures. There are still "socialist psychoanalysts", not so much in clinical psychoanalysis but in the cultural field: Slavoj Žižek is by far the most famous of them. Lacanian and edgy
Invaluable lecture, thank you.
all this for us with the mere push of a button. Wonderful !
Freud credited Sabina in the footnotes, the translator/publisher of the English editions decided not to translate the footnotes. 1:16:19 It's so upsetting that 1. Sabina was forgotten. 2. Freud is being accused of stealing her ideas when he did no such thing and gave her full credit
cool. i llike this. i'm suffering right now... and it is helping me to make time go faster...
Great lecture! Thank you! I came across this video when was looking for a comprehensive overwiew of main psychological theories, so it was a great founding!
You are good. Obrigado!
This is a truly outstanding presentation. My only comments are that Jacques Lacan should have fit in somewhere; and that Franz Brentano clearly never owned a cat.
Around 2:05, I believe the word he was searching for is Plato.
Thank you so much
What about Enrrique Pichon Riviere´s social psychology (mostly base in psychoanalysis, taken a lot as well from Reich)?
Jesus Brito South American psychoanalysts are very influenced by British Kleinian theory.
Best of all, thanks
In discussing Chomsky's originality, people often overlook his teacher, Zellig Harris,
Are there presentations available from the course?
Great job!
Excellent
1:52:32 We live in a society...
A misunderstanding of the notion of intentionality in this lecture, otherwise extremely informative and well-structured. The concept of intentionality as revived from the scholastics by brentano is not the capacity of the mind to have intentions but rather the ‘about ness’ of mental states, I.e their capacity to refer to things.
I might be wrong - or I did not understand your explanation - but Archetypes are a cross-cultural "phenomena" translated to "our national/tribal culture".
They are not generated separately in each culture.
They are Common in "essence". The translation is not the Archetype. The translation belongs to a certain Culture but the Archetypes belong to OUR Culture.
Check this...
Obrigado!
Excellent lecture, i do however disagree about the notion of this as the first personality theory and also the notion of ancient disinterest in personalit on the grounds of Galenos work on bodily fluids and "characters".
lol yes pets absolutely have unique personalities!