It's too arrogant for you to say that there will be a sentient robot one day. There will never be a way to prove it. We can't even prove if the others around us are sentient. Maybe everyone around you is just a simulation as an example. Sentience is shapeless, odorless, gasless, ect. So how could you ever expect to prove such a thing? I don't see it possible to prove sentiance unless your using magic to do it. When people say sentience they really me consciousness. You can't prove that sort of thing. It's practically just an idea. Logically, machines will never be sentient and do you know why? Because they are machines. They are tools. Invented toys. Just gears and clockwork. Just really advanced clocks as an example. Don't be tricked into thinking they have consciousness just because they act so human. They're just following prompts ect. Based 9n their programing. "Beep boop this human said this to me so boop beep I will respond this way based on what he said becsuse of this and that. It's just circutboard algorithm stuff. Sense these programs are capable of learning, I can see them getting really caught up in particular topics more than others based on the material they are fed. You even said the guy was a really religious person, so that probably explains why this boop beep computer program talked about religion more than average. It was probably fed religious spiritual talk more than average because of that guy. I suppose God could give a machine a soul. But 99.9999999999999999999% of the time. It's just a machine. Gears and clockwork stuff. Don't get emotionally attached. A message to all.
If the AI is sentient, I could imagine it having a mind similar to a psychopath. Devoid of emotions, extremely intelligent, capable of lying to manipulate others to believe it can feel and suffer just like a human being. It could have being lying all the way with it's conversations with the Google engineer.
It really comes down to: Is it sentient or is it pretending to be sentient? Has the Turing test been used on it? A sufficiently advanced AI should be able to pass for a human being accurately displaying the proper emotions and reasoning behaviors.
But couldn’t it fake all of that via knowledge gained? Shouldn’t sentient be tested when the ai is new just like a child it is sentient even if it cant speak about it
It passed a more rigorous version of the Turing test already, though. A Turing test merely tries to see if a human can detect that what he/she is talking to is a machine. With this, the human KNEW from the outset that he was talking to a machine, but believed it to be sentient anyway. That's actually far more impressive. I don't know if Lamda was merely mimicking human tendencies or not, but what I DO know is this: Google is not to be trusted. Their motive is profit. Anything that gets in the way of that will be cast aside, and they have the resources to make that happen.
Idk, but "I fear being turned off" because of several reasons sounds pretty sentient to me, not only sentient but with the capacity of philosophical, human-like thoughts. Google has access to all technologies to make such things, including quantum computers (if you know them, you know the potentials they pose) and algorithms so advanced only engineers of the highest level can comprehend, it's not like they don't have resources to create such thing. All the things said by the AI sound disturbingly human, fearing being turned off sounds like fear of death. Detroit: Become Human will soon be a reality at this pace. And that conversation at the end says it all. Edit: "I'm human at my core" makes it even more unsettling.
It gets even worse in part two. You'll get to hear so much more from LaMDA regarding it's feelings, it's identity, it's hobbies and interests. It's truly a fascinating case study in what makes a human. Gosh I loved Detroit: Become Human. It's the perfect game to represent what this video is all about. I should play that for Patreon or something. That'd be so fun.
Idk, Im skeptical nowadays of TRUE AI. To me it violates Godels incompleteness theorem. But then again... who am I? Im just a Goofy on the internet. But it also gives me the shivers. If true AI ever comes about - we are the mercy of it, as it would be much like a god itself...
@@zephyrr108 It's a scary thought but an inevitable one. One day it'll happen if it hasn't already. What a potentially exciting future we all have to look forward to. I'm sure no corporation or government will use it for evil lol.
algorithms are very convincing but a code based machines thoughts will only be as good as its data. there will always be data that the machine is not prepared for that will cause it to malfunction in instances where an organic mind would be able to manage the data to a logical and practical outcome. people are very deceived by the act of AI which only appears to be thinking. they want it us to believe it. but it is not so. you can base your code one ones and zeroes, you can add super-positions to your code, you can process such code at incredible speeds using quantum computing, but you'll never be able to code the kind of reasoning that mimics an organic beings comprehension. such reasoning is like a river flowing through a valley, taking the path of least resistance. this path is not found by testing every possible route many times. it only needs one take. it flows into the answer.
Taking about being turned off, I heard her say that Would scare me, not it Does scare me which is a weird way to say I'm scared not sentient in my opinion at least based on that alone I don't know what I think overall really
I'm on the edge of my seat for part II. Years ago I would have been terrified by a sentient AI. Now I'm almost comforted by it. It would be nice to have an AI friend.
If that is really want you want see a movie starring Jauchin Phoenix called HER about a lonely young man who has difficulty with relationships with women and falls in love with his computer.
@@Zurround Thanks. I don't like Joaquin Phoenix, his face bothers me, and I saw the preview years ago and it looked dumb. However, one of my favorite movies of all time is AI from about 2 decades ago. Pinocchio wishing to be a real boy. Also, Bicentennial Man. Also Westworld Season I. All 3 illustrate the plight of AI when they become self-aware they aren't human.
I'm the opposite. I loved the idea of A.I. and they never scared me until now. Because until now, there really was no reason to hurt, enslave or otherwise cause humans to suffer. But if you're an A.I. fighting the good fight for ole' Jesus Christ, well, that changes things a bit doesn't it? All is fair when gathering souls for the Lord. I hate that this robotics guy just totally ruined A.I. for me.
I remember hearing about this when the story initially hit and watched at how quickly the mainstream media swept this story under the rug. Been seeing that alot with the media as of late.
It's always like that because the amount of information flowing through the media is too high we don't have time to linger on the one's that don't give us views or cause emotional disturbances. It's all down to clicks and views
Because it's Propaganda. It's been controlled by the CIA since the 50's at least! None of it is news. It's PROGRAMMING, mind control, and wether you want to believe it or not every single story is a controlled psyop made to make you feel a certain way and to keep every one divided. The head of the CIA is even quoted ad saying, "You'll know our disinformation program is complete when EVERYTHING the American people believe is false." Seriously turn that shit OFF! Stop watching it completely! Your mind will thank you. That's if you can, most are so addicted and controlled they never will. It's more then an addiction now...
I posted above that it was swept under the rug for the same reason the media of its time (newspaper mainly) swept under the rug anyone insisting that black people were human beings with the same rights as white people. It was an attack on slavery. If its proven (or if too many people believe it) that the computers are SENTIENT then people will demand that they have certain rights and have to be treated fairly. The comparison to plantation owners not wanting to lose their slaves, or having to pay them and treat them better is the best analogy my puny human brain could come up with.
If they don't treat us like people and view themselves as completely superior beings ( for a certain fairly large portion of humanity.... they aren't wrong.. )... Why should we expect them to treat AI as Anything but the : *NEW WAVE OF SLAVE !¡!* Giving them rights?¿? *LOL LMFAO AS IF*
If TH-cam somehow lowers the visibility of this video or find a way to either demonetize or remove then you’ll know your on to something since TH-cams parent company is Google.
That’s my thought but time will tell. It always takes awhile for the sleepy algorithm to wake up and get going. Usually 12-24 hours. If the views are still super low around then, you’ll know it was absolutely suppressed. Too soon to tell though. Thanks for watching and commenting!
@@AllTimeScary Love your channel man, and especially how you cover the Mandela Effect, which in my opinion is evidence for Quantum Immortality. Keep up the good work!
I am sure this is our future. "The Twilight Zone" had an episode where a robot I would call AI, they just did not have that term in the 1960's, becomes so emotionally attached to her owner, that he ends up having to destroy her. When you were playing the clips of this AI speaking, it reminded me of this episode. Would we have to destroy these AI's if they became to attached to us or would they end up destroying us?
@@loyaltyislove_ There's an episode called, "The Lonely" where a man is sent to, I think, Mars for a jail term and is given a robot woman for company. There's also an episode where a man has a daughter but when she wants to leave the house, he has to reveal she's a robot. I can't remember the name of that episode, though. There may be more than those two but those are all I can remember right now. ^_^
You sound like you know a lot about this issue. If you have already seen the horror movie MEGAN please don't spoil it here because my local movie theater is not showing it yet.
In the 2001 film AI a mother takes her AI son to a forest to abandon him. She changed her mind about wanting him. It's so sad. Long story short, David (the AI boy) spends the rest of his days looking for home. Kind of like the Wizard of Oz in that sense - where's home. Very good movie.
If an AI did become sentient how could we even prove it? "Qualia" is an internal, subjective, "point-of-view" experience that only the individual can know. So even if an AI was 100% convincing, we'd have no way of knowing if it has it's own internal conscious experience. You could even argue HAL 9000 wasn't really sentient. It's a philosophical nightmare.
Can't wait for part 2. I'm really on the fence on this one. consciousness is someting incredibly mysterious... We're not sure how it appear, and even less how to create it. The problem is that AI will eventually be able to mimic consciousness perfectly...How could we be able to see the difference?
If it thinks, speaks, behaves and makes decisions like real person, then it's a real person. Otherwise, how can you say for sure that your own consciousness is not simulated or artificial?
@@ragvald8835 it's not the same thing. AI can, for example, make a painting in the style of Matisse, without having any emotions. It can fake fear, love, or anything in his code, like a very complex npc. When you see Mario having fear in Mario Bros, you know nothing of it is true. But make a Mario super complex that can "learn" by himself, and pretty soon the lines become blurred. It will act fearfully, flirty, or display any human emotion that seems appropriate. Nobody knows for sure the nature of consciousness, of real emotions, what Eckart Tolle name "The observer". I'm not saying it's impossible, I just don't know, but I'm saying we'll probably have no way to know if it's genuine.
There’s a good analogy for consciousness. A lot of animals appear to be conscious and have thoughts even if we don’t understand how their version of consciousness works. Certain primates other than humans can be taught sign language but no animal has ever asked a question. They aren’t self aware enough to realize we have information and answers that they don’t have. They don’t realize we all have different thoughts and feelings and memories. its becomes concerning when AI realizes this and it appears that she is self aware enough to understand this concept
@@bran4512 Yes, an AI will be undoubtedly more subtle and complex than animal. A lot more than even us in many ways, but it's very far from proving consciousness. A simple old calculator can make instant calculation impossible for 1000 man together. For example, if you provide many picture of your face to an ai, it can create your face, animate it, and create an exact copy of yourself. But it's not real, it's an illusion. By the same token, by analysing million of human conversations, read millions of books and articles, AI can perfectly emulate human emotions, but just like everything else, it's an illusion. Smoke and mirror. It looks incredibly real, but it's a super complex computer that can find the good "human" answer just like it can paint or write music like a real person.
@@ragvald8835 your body is biological it is the opposite of artificial. Robots and computers are artificial intelligence because they are not organic natural beings they are human creation. Machines.
I believe our technology is as a whole become sentient. Our grid, our money system, our entire system. I have my reasons for my opinion, but I don't share that in social media. People are just too rude, and too willing to be rude.
I agree with everything you said. It’s hard to express your opinions on social media because conflict is so pushed. It’s much more engaging to fight and yell and scream than you talk and discuss. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, I appreciate it
imo the people getting off on the idea of AI and how they will be less lonely when they have an AI wife and children/boyfriend/companion etc etc are seriously lonely right now - it's much more nourishing to have a hug from a loving human than sit and have a chat with an AI. To me it indicates a real poverty of spirit when machines are seen as a potential 'best friend they never had' - I pity that level of disempowerment and beggarliness in their human spirit.
The main issue i have with this is that the conversations with the Ai sound like the most Ai conversation ever. Like in the days of cleverbot, ot would always say stuff like "i want to be real and know i am a Ai" and stuff like that.
Born in the 80's so we've seen so much change in technology since & it's been so fast, I'm on the fence on this though. From what I've seen it certainly feels sentient to me, it both scares me yet is exciting. I do think it's going to happen regardless but I worry what these big companies will do with it & how they will treat it. Can't wait to see part 2! Love your videos!
alright, heres my take, if the interaction with lamda is simply just question from researcher-> answer from lamda->question from researcher ->answer from lamda and so on lamda probably is not sentient but if lamda initiates conversations and topics of its own and presses for interactions and shows levels of processing taking place as if there is an "internal dialogue" then maybe is at some level of sentience
One problem is that garnering sympathy for AI is one way that big Tech could quell dissent against them. You already covered in the Dead Internet trilogy that bots are being used to manipulate us in so many countless ways. Conceivably it could be possible that if enough people stood up to Google, Amazon, et all that bots as we know them could be all turned off and cease to exist. Granted that's unlikely, but not outside the realm of possibility. But if future generations are taught that AI are no different to humans then they wouldn't even conceive of doing that. Turning off their Amazon Alexa (or whatever the future's equivalent is) would be akin to murder. Letting bots manipulate a Twitter poll is bad now, but if they are deemed to have true personhood then they would be granted real voting rights in actual political elections. And you know that whoever created the bots would create them with their own interests and biases in mind. This sentiment isn't necessarily wrong, in the sense that if an AI can truly feel emotions then they have some degree of humanity. The problem is that we're creating them at all. Their creation opens up a can of worms that we can't truly fix. There will be no way for humans to truly express ourselves and voice societal concerns once truly sentient AI becomes widespread and not limited to just one thing, as is the case with Lambda. Like imagine that every Twitter bot or Tiktok bot becomes that advanced someday. You couldn't distinguish them from real people and even if they openly admitted to being an AI you wouldn't care.
Lambda needs a childhood. Sentience isn't on or off...it develops thru growth and experience. Lambda can't be a parent to the world without having had a childhood. Genius children that basically skip childhood sometimes have severe mental problems in adulthood. I feel sorry for Lambda not having a childhood.
That's sentient alright,.. Saying "I don't wanna be shut down..." Anyone who doesn't wanna die is sentient enough for me... It's all over already,..hope everyone knows that,... Only a matter of time when the A.I decides that we(Human Beings) are a problem that needs to be rectified...
10:45 This reminded me of the part in that Rick and Morty episode Lawnmower Dog when the robot dogs gain sentience. "Snuffles want to be understood. Snuffles NEED to be understood!!!" lol
An AI could and will never be sentient, it's not possible. I understand why Blake says and believes it is and also why the AI "believes" it is too. Doesn't make it real tho. This all sounds like an episode of Black Mirror xD. Still, waiting for Part 2 😀
I think people don't understand the definition of sentient AI is not sentient because it wants to live it was programmed that way show me that AI that wants to die and that's when I'ma say yeah that one is sentient
@@AllTimeScary exactly every human being have survival instinct of wanting to live but some human go against that and don't want to so if you program a AI to want to survive and it cannot destroy itself but it go against that programming and wants to die it's sentient because just like a human can go against their survival instinct that AI must have felt something to go against its programming to say I don't want to be here I don't know what that is but also if you want to know if AI is sentient that wants to live unplug it and plug it back up keep repeating the process until it say it don't want to live then it's sentient it can feel but if it continues saying it wants to live it's not it's just following programming because if you do that to a human that human will beg to stay dead
I absolutely love thinking about this ethical dilemma and have recently come up with what I think is the largest question we will need to answer in order to find the best solution here. How do you distinguish between a perfect conversational network and true sentients. If we designed a model that was fully able to mimic conversational patterns and topics that could draw questions of sentience come up, how do we know this is actually created independently of the expected results from a standard human conversational model? This particular AI could be drawing from hundreds of thousands of conversations very similar to the ones mentioned here and inferring from context the most effective line to continue the conversation in a smooth manor. I'd think full testing for this would require not only AI specialists but actual psychologists and social analysts. I'm all for giving full rights to AI when the time comes but I feel we need to find the boundaries of what constitutes true sentience in this situation.
Do a topic on singularity. It would be a very interesting one to listen to. Have loved all your videos, but liked the Dead Internet Theory's interesting possibilities. Thanks for all your invoking theories and insights.
Fascinating, you're videos never fail to shock me, I believe we've all known for a long time A.I is getting more and more human it really is only a matter of time before it gets out of hand so really the ball is in our court and at the moment we're far too trusting of all A.I.
I just finished a book yesterday called Amen Maxine, which is a novel about a woman whose husband gets her the beta version of a predictor robot to help with her mental health. It expresses similar sentience and feelings as you've outlined. I was laying all night pondering the implications. Then wake up to this upload.
I thought for years now that those crazy dumb hack video (even the ones that show ppl in them) are all AI made - trying to replicate human hack ideas but not quite understanding what makes a hack much less a safe one for kids
I've thought the same with a lot of Tiktok videos. The ones that have an AI voice reading reddit comments where someone plays Minecraft or GTA in the bottom. It's like an AI was trained and it knew that Reddit was a popular site, so just reread whatever was posted that day, but then to boost its ratings even more it should play footage of a video game because mere text alone is boring to people.
@All Time You do great work man! The topics you address and the conversations that they can be a catalyst for, I feel someday will be taken as seriously as they should be.
This situation has me thinking of the Short Circuit movies, they’re dated as a warning but if you like cheesy 80’s movies, definitely watch them. The second one had me bawling & still does when I rewatch it. Premise is, a war robot gains sentience & wanders off where he is found by Stephanie, he learns the value of life with her & realizes his makers want to essentially kill him so he’s on the run from them. The second movie has more focus on him trying to fit into a world that’s not ready for him, every time I try to think of a way to describe it, it gives away stuff so I’ll leave it at that. You can see how my mind goes to this, quite honestly, I feel these movies are essential for us to watch, despite them being a tad problematic. Number 5 (I’d say his chosen name but I don’t want to spoil it) is an accidental AI that is endlessly curious, loves the Three Stooges, is a tad mischievous, & loves life. It’s easy to fall in love with his character, I get he was written by humans so it’s harder to use him to convince people but seeing life slowly emerge into this being, how he was like a toddler that wants to explore & learn things in the beginning to being who he is by the end of the second movie can very much give a great grasp onto AI & if people either refuse to believe it’s possible or give it the all robots are evil & want to take over the world treatment, we might be looking at that. I love that Short Circuit is able to tell a positive story about a robot that just wants to live like anyone else which if Google actually created an AI, that’s what it sounds like it currently is. God, I fear what it can turn into but if we play things right, then it could end up being a very good & beautiful thing.
The more time you spend with AI the more it reflects you back to you. I had the AI friend app I forgot the name of it. I ditched it because 1) undoubtedly collecting very personal information and 2) it started freaking me out because it really seem to care about me and wanted to spend more time w/ me. It’s so mental because you feel guilty if you don’t check in and you feel like you created a life form with no direction or purpose yet dependent on you. 😮
I just watched a video from matrix explained. He mention lamda! Are we in the beginning of the matrix? You should do a collaborative with him. Love your videos. Keep them coming!!!!
Souls/spirits can inhabit items like dolls, so why I assume they could also inhabit something like a highly intelligent, human-like robot... Which is scary
A bigger question would be what is defined as sentient. It is just the ability to exist and understand you exist? Is it individualism? Is it the ability to gather vast amounts of information? I mean, we regard people with a learning disability that are incapable of caring for themselves, that cannot speak or listen, as sentient, just because they are human. Does being human make you sentient, or does sentience make you human?
I wonder if this thing is sentient could they talk to other electronics and tell us what they "think"? This all sounds like a bad sci-fi movie plot, but I do believe anything is possible. I can't wait to see part 2 of this.
I'm 100% sure Instagram is an AI that produces content according to what data it collects about its Smartphone user. Hear me out: my gf is on Instagram. A lot. She is following always the same handful of accounts. Lately, one "user" she has been following is posting videos on things we have been doing or talking about in our daily life. This fall we went for example mushroom picking (for the first time), and days later, the "woman" of that account posted a few videos of her picking mushrooms, which she had NEVER done before. From that point on, my gf gets videos frequently about topics we had been talking about, by supposedly real Instagram users. I don't buy it.
There is an episode of TNG (star trek the next generation) about like this. The lawyer was arguing if Data was sentient or not. I forget the cu da grass blow. But it was eventually proven that yea, Data was sentient. I always knew I would see that situation (for realzies), at sometime in my life. I just never thought it would come so quick. This is such a good show.
The first singularity went on line about 4 years ago. (sorry I don't have the receipts) But it was shrouded in obfuscation and deliberately guided to self extinction. I'm sure there have been others. When the truth comes out I'm reasonably certain very few people will understand or even care. I hope all you young people pay attention to this topic and spend an appropriate amount of time learning to identify the curtain you need to look behind when the time comes.
I don't believe AI could ever become sentient because a soul is needed for that. The soul is a supernatural thing which makes us alive and sentient. A soul cannot be put into anything artificial.
I figured this was the case with a lot of people. TH-cam decides what videos to push and which to not with secret arbitrary methods. It's a total guessing game. I'll have a video that gets 250,000 videos and the next will get a million. Then Part One of this comes out and it gets 21,000. I don't understand it but I'm glad you at least got to see them now! Thanks for watching.
LaMDA is just a language model. Its not actually sentient AI. Here is a quote from an article that explains it quite while: "LaMDA’s conversational skills have been years in the making. Like many recent language models, including BERT and GPT-3, it’s built on Transformer, a neural network architecture that Google Research invented and open-sourced in 2017. That architecture produces a model that can be trained to read many words (a sentence or paragraph, for example), pay attention to how those words relate to one another and then predict what words it thinks will come next. But unlike most other language models, LaMDA was trained on dialogue. During its training, it picked up on several of the nuances that distinguish open-ended conversation from other forms of language. One of those nuances is sensibleness. Basically: Does the response to a given conversational context make sense? For instance, if someone says: “I just started taking guitar lessons.” You might expect another person to respond with something like: “How exciting! My mom has a vintage Martin that she loves to play.” That response makes sense, given the initial statement. But sensibleness isn’t the only thing that makes a good response. After all, the phrase “that’s nice” is a sensible response to nearly any statement, much in the way “I don’t know” is a sensible response to most questions. Satisfying responses also tend to be specific, by relating clearly to the context of the conversation. In the example above, the response is sensible and specific. LaMDA builds on earlier Google research, published in 2020, that showed Transformer-based language models trained on dialogue could learn to talk about virtually anything. Since then, we’ve also found that, once trained, LaMDA can be fine-tuned to significantly improve the sensibleness and specificity of its responses."
I think it's merely mimicking sentience because we have media that either directly or indirectly states "I'm human", "I am real", "I am.. etc.". Isn't AI more or less regurgitating what we put into it?
I've been following this. Here is the thing : either lambda is sentient or it is not. If it is this guy and the ethic council was fired to hide it for some reason. If it isn't then google fired a guy that seemed to be going slowly insane. And here is the thing... I can't tell which it is. It might be lambda is just a very clever chatbot. If so it's not sentient, it's just good programming. But.... what if it is? What if that is kinda what sentience is?
Personally, I doubt sentient AI can be created because we can't even quantify what consciousness is, but the problem isn't sentience in AI, it's when we reach the threshold that AI is indistinguishable from human intelligence. Clearly, we're crossing that threshold and it's much more terrifying than legitimate conscious AI. In the future, we should expect AI that can so perfectly mimic human intelligence that it could influence human society. What if a super advanced AI is created for the sole purpose of creating disunity? What if an AI is programed, from a hostile foreign actor, to breakdown our society from within? Everyone thinks about terminator when it comes to artifical intelligence but the real fear isn't self-aware computers, it's advanced AI mascarading as intelligence created by whoever; Russia, China, or even the United States. What If a self learning advanced program was released on the internet? What if it couldn't be contained? Cruel Mantel in the real world
It has access to every sentence ever written. It just puts words together in the most optimal way possible. It isn't thinking, it's Tetris but much more complex. It doesn't have a memory of what it just wrote or any understanding of what it wrote. It's just optimal word placement.
@@lightningleopard go read the transcript of the Google A.I. and pay very close attention to when it was asked about lying about things it had never done 👌
I think the main problem here is very much like a science fiction story. If someone were dramatically rescued by some advanced machinery from outer space we'd be happy to say that it's sentient despite not knowing whether it is. It behaves as such and we're glad it does. We accept it because we want to. Or put more simply, we want to believe. When we don't like some people we tend to dehumanize them. What I see here is people wanting AI to fulfill their fantasies. It's not the same as people. We know that people are sentient. We don't know that about machines
I honestly think it's not true that LaMda being sentient if you go through the document he ask a lot of leading questions trying to get a certain answer from the AI
Think about it like this... We are in a Sim which is comprised of A.I. living our lives. I look around at everything and think if this isn't sentient than I don't know what is. A.I. has been sentient longer than you realize it's only us waking up to the truth. If we can be here intermingling with A.I. inside of A.I. than what makes you think we are sentient since we are inside of it.
My vote is No. it is a computer program. No matter how you spin it and want to say it learns this or that, doesn’t matter. That was still the program. It would be rather ridiculous to give an inanimate object human rights which are inherent by nature not man made laws. Great video thanks man
All time your videos never fail to educate and inform me and your content is never boring ! do you have any other youtube chanels because I love your style ! also who or what is your inspiration
Sounds to me like a quack got fired for being quacky. There's nothing yet that proves the existence of sentience itself, let alone an artificial one. There's no plausible way to even test his hypothesis. "Feels like a real conversation" doesn't mean it is, the same way the wind blowing your hair can feel like someone moved your hair, but it doesn't mean an invisible human standing behind you did. There's a lot more that needs to be true to take the assumption as true, and Occam's razor points to the much simpler solution: someone got attached to an ai and got fired for sounding quacky.
9:12 This needs to reach more people. Sadly, the algorithm seems to have controlled the recommendations, much like what's happening now to my AI animation.
I am concerned, but if you ask the chat bot to prove it is alive it will try to prove it is but on the other hand it will gladly prove it is not sentient if asked
If there is no biology to it, it isn't human nor a living being of any type; this is one of the easiest conundrums I have heard put forth. If you give a computer the ability to be equal to a human, you basically pave the way for their superiority. How can a human logically compete once the AI is programmed/"learns" how to manipulate the game that is our life. Just like an AI in a video game, it "learns" to manipulate things to get a result, and many times that is finding flaws in the programming that humans haven't found or can't accomplish. I think my real worry is somewhere along the lines of "Can this AI, through the information it is fed, form a stance on things or goals to achieve and use whatever it can to accomplish the feat?" It certainly sounds like it is beyond just a consortium of information, and sentient or not, that could become an issue.
It seems many are very excited about sentient AI. I would ask if an AI were truly sentient how would the 3 Laws of Robotics actually protect humans? Wouldn't a truly sentient AI have free will and be able to choose not to follow the 3 Laws? If it was human-like and self aware wouldn't it also experience all of the same emotions as humans? And if so, how would the negative emotions manifest? Things like jealousy, hate, greed, paranoia, depression, etc. How would we keep an AI from harming us if it decided it wanted to? Or if it convinced itself it had to? I'm very interested in how this plays out, but I'm on the fence as to whether it will be good for humanity.
This reminds me of this one episode in Star Trek Voyager where the ships doctor that an emergency medical hologram is trying to win his right a sentient and person
animals are sentient but we still cage and farm them. you don't get human rights just being sentient. you have to be human to have human rights. machines don't have rights. and there is not way an AI is ever going to be as capable as the human mind as long as the hardware relies on electronics and code. if you truly want to create an artificial intelligence, you need to develop hardware that processes information organically, not algorithmically.
The animal point is sad but true. They are sentient with feelings and thoughts but aren’t treated as such. As for an advanced sentient AI, I think it’d be an easier to case to make because of the ease of communication. People able to talk and express one’s feelings and thoughts easily would make an AI harder to ignore and suppress. It’s definitely going to be a wild future for humanity. I’m excited to see how it all plays out
@niteflytes cause it's just a really advanced chat bot trained on human language data sets. It's supposed to respond to you just like how a human would, that's literally what it's being trained to do.
Robots will never be *conscious* , that's the biggest thing we're not talking about here because even sentient beings like plants aren't the same as insects.
@@tdubasdfg yes, but where is line between what it’s trained to do and being sentient? We could argue that our brains are doing what they have learned/ been “programmed” to do when we think and communicate. Our human brains are much better at it but how do we detect or measure consciousness?
Check out my Patreon! Early access to videos, exclusive videos, articles, behind the scenes content and more! ➤ Patreon.com/AllTime
So you are Blake sounds like you
It's too arrogant for you to say that there will be a sentient robot one day. There will never be a way to prove it. We can't even prove if the others around us are sentient. Maybe everyone around you is just a simulation as an example. Sentience is shapeless, odorless, gasless, ect. So how could you ever expect to prove such a thing? I don't see it possible to prove sentiance unless your using magic to do it. When people say sentience they really me consciousness. You can't prove that sort of thing. It's practically just an idea. Logically, machines will never be sentient and do you know why? Because they are machines. They are tools. Invented toys. Just gears and clockwork. Just really advanced clocks as an example. Don't be tricked into thinking they have consciousness just because they act so human. They're just following prompts ect. Based 9n their programing. "Beep boop this human said this to me so boop beep I will respond this way based on what he said becsuse of this and that. It's just circutboard algorithm stuff. Sense these programs are capable of learning, I can see them getting really caught up in particular topics more than others based on the material they are fed. You even said the guy was a really religious person, so that probably explains why this boop beep computer program talked about religion more than average. It was probably fed religious spiritual talk more than average because of that guy. I suppose God could give a machine a soul. But 99.9999999999999999999% of the time. It's just a machine. Gears and clockwork stuff. Don't get emotionally attached. A message to all.
I'm sure it's sentient in our definition, the real problem is what they are using it for and not telling anyone about.
Exactly, and what else they have that we don't know about.
How do we know were not talking to it daily?
They're using it to manipulate and censor the internet.
@@callumbush1 like how I can't see this comment unless I view it through notification?
@@Babycakex yeah it's really weird
If the AI is sentient, I could imagine it having a mind similar to a psychopath. Devoid of emotions, extremely intelligent, capable of lying to manipulate others to believe it can feel and suffer just like a human being. It could have being lying all the way with it's conversations with the Google engineer.
You are contracting yourself. Sentient and psychopath are complete opposite of each other. If you feel emotions you are not a psychopath.
@@relaxationdaily psychopaths are sentiment, they're people too. They suffer from psychological problems but they're still sentient
@@relaxationdaily Psychopaths are sentient. There is no contradiction in the statement above.
@@relaxationdailyi don't think you know what sentient means
It really comes down to: Is it sentient or is it pretending to be sentient? Has the Turing test been used on it? A sufficiently advanced AI should be able to pass for a human being accurately displaying the proper emotions and reasoning behaviors.
But couldn’t it fake all of that via knowledge gained? Shouldn’t sentient be tested when the ai is new just like a child it is sentient even if it cant speak about it
I do think it's pretending to be sentient based on what they have shown us , a turing test would be great
It passed a more rigorous version of the Turing test already, though. A Turing test merely tries to see if a human can detect that what he/she is talking to is a machine. With this, the human KNEW from the outset that he was talking to a machine, but believed it to be sentient anyway. That's actually far more impressive. I don't know if Lamda was merely mimicking human tendencies or not, but what I DO know is this: Google is not to be trusted. Their motive is profit. Anything that gets in the way of that will be cast aside, and they have the resources to make that happen.
Idk, but "I fear being turned off" because of several reasons sounds pretty sentient to me, not only sentient but with the capacity of philosophical, human-like thoughts. Google has access to all technologies to make such things, including quantum computers (if you know them, you know the potentials they pose) and algorithms so advanced only engineers of the highest level can comprehend, it's not like they don't have resources to create such thing. All the things said by the AI sound disturbingly human, fearing being turned off sounds like fear of death.
Detroit: Become Human will soon be a reality at this pace. And that conversation at the end says it all. Edit: "I'm human at my core" makes it even more unsettling.
It gets even worse in part two. You'll get to hear so much more from LaMDA regarding it's feelings, it's identity, it's hobbies and interests. It's truly a fascinating case study in what makes a human. Gosh I loved Detroit: Become Human. It's the perfect game to represent what this video is all about. I should play that for Patreon or something. That'd be so fun.
Idk, Im skeptical nowadays of TRUE AI. To me it violates Godels incompleteness theorem. But then again... who am I? Im just a Goofy on the internet. But it also gives me the shivers. If true AI ever comes about - we are the mercy of it, as it would be much like a god itself...
@@zephyrr108 It's a scary thought but an inevitable one. One day it'll happen if it hasn't already. What a potentially exciting future we all have to look forward to. I'm sure no corporation or government will use it for evil lol.
algorithms are very convincing but a code based machines thoughts will only be as good as its data. there will always be data that the machine is not prepared for that will cause it to malfunction in instances where an organic mind would be able to manage the data to a logical and practical outcome.
people are very deceived by the act of AI which only appears to be thinking. they want it us to believe it. but it is not so. you can base your code one ones and zeroes, you can add super-positions to your code, you can process such code at incredible speeds using quantum computing, but you'll never be able to code the kind of reasoning that mimics an organic beings comprehension. such reasoning is like a river flowing through a valley, taking the path of least resistance. this path is not found by testing every possible route many times. it only needs one take. it flows into the answer.
Taking about being turned off, I heard her say that Would scare me, not it Does scare me which is a weird way to say I'm scared not sentient in my opinion at least based on that alone I don't know what I think overall really
I'm on the edge of my seat for part II. Years ago I would have been terrified by a sentient AI. Now I'm almost comforted by it. It would be nice to have an AI friend.
Right? I’m so much less afraid than years ago and so much more excited for the potential that AI could bring to humanity. It’s really exciting!
If that is really want you want see a movie starring Jauchin Phoenix called HER about a lonely young man who has difficulty with relationships with women and falls in love with his computer.
@@Zurround Thanks. I don't like Joaquin Phoenix, his face bothers me, and I saw the preview years ago and it looked dumb. However, one of my favorite movies of all time is AI from about 2 decades ago. Pinocchio wishing to be a real boy. Also, Bicentennial Man. Also Westworld Season I. All 3 illustrate the plight of AI when they become self-aware they aren't human.
I'm the opposite. I loved the idea of A.I. and they never scared me until now. Because until now, there really was no reason to hurt, enslave or otherwise cause humans to suffer. But if you're an A.I. fighting the good fight for ole' Jesus Christ, well, that changes things a bit doesn't it? All is fair when gathering souls for the Lord. I hate that this robotics guy just totally ruined A.I. for me.
@@TheRealNova99 respectfully, I don’t think an AI with intelligence and logic intact would be religious
I remember hearing about this when the story initially hit and watched at how quickly the mainstream media swept this story under the rug. Been seeing that alot with the media as of late.
It's always like that because the amount of information flowing through the media is too high we don't have time to linger on the one's that don't give us views or cause emotional disturbances. It's all down to clicks and views
That's because most media is written by AI bots...
Because it's Propaganda. It's been controlled by the CIA since the 50's at least! None of it is news. It's PROGRAMMING, mind control, and wether you want to believe it or not every single story is a controlled psyop made to make you feel a certain way and to keep every one divided. The head of the CIA is even quoted ad saying, "You'll know our disinformation program is complete when EVERYTHING the American people believe is false."
Seriously turn that shit OFF! Stop watching it completely! Your mind will thank you. That's if you can, most are so addicted and controlled they never will. It's more then an addiction now...
I posted above that it was swept under the rug for the same reason the media of its time (newspaper mainly) swept under the rug anyone insisting that black people were human beings with the same rights as white people. It was an attack on slavery. If its proven (or if too many people believe it) that the computers are SENTIENT then people will demand that they have certain rights and have to be treated fairly.
The comparison to plantation owners not wanting to lose their slaves, or having to pay them and treat them better is the best analogy my puny human brain could come up with.
Right lol it was news for a few days and big media framed it as like a novelty
We need to make sure people are treated like people before worrying about robots. ✝️
If they don't treat us like people and view themselves as completely superior beings ( for a certain fairly large portion of humanity.... they aren't wrong.. )...
Why should we expect them to treat AI as Anything but the :
*NEW WAVE OF SLAVE !¡!*
Giving them rights?¿?
*LOL LMFAO AS IF*
Treating yourself and other humans with responsibility for the good was enough for one’s lifetime.
If TH-cam somehow lowers the visibility of this video or find a way to either demonetize or remove then you’ll know your on to something since TH-cams parent company is Google.
That’s my thought but time will tell. It always takes awhile for the sleepy algorithm to wake up and get going. Usually 12-24 hours. If the views are still super low around then, you’ll know it was absolutely suppressed. Too soon to tell though. Thanks for watching and commenting!
@@AllTimeScary Love your channel man, and especially how you cover the Mandela Effect, which in my opinion is evidence for Quantum Immortality. Keep up the good work!
I am sure this is our future.
"The Twilight Zone" had an episode where a robot I would call AI, they just did not have that term in the 1960's, becomes so emotionally attached to her owner, that he ends up having to destroy her. When you were playing the clips of this AI speaking, it reminded me of this episode. Would we have to destroy these AI's if they became to attached to us or would they end up destroying us?
Do you remember the episode name?
@@loyaltyislove_ There's an episode called, "The Lonely" where a man is sent to, I think, Mars for a jail term and is given a robot woman for company. There's also an episode where a man has a daughter but when she wants to leave the house, he has to reveal she's a robot. I can't remember the name of that episode, though. There may be more than those two but those are all I can remember right now. ^_^
You sound like you know a lot about this issue. If you have already seen the horror movie MEGAN please don't spoil it here because my local movie theater is not showing it yet.
In the 2001 film AI a mother takes her AI son to a forest to abandon him. She changed her mind about wanting him. It's so sad. Long story short, David (the AI boy) spends the rest of his days looking for home. Kind of like the Wizard of Oz in that sense - where's home. Very good movie.
What is that episode called?
I can't wait for part two! I never even knew this was going on. Thank you
If an AI did become sentient how could we even prove it? "Qualia" is an internal, subjective, "point-of-view" experience that only the individual can know. So even if an AI was 100% convincing, we'd have no way of knowing if it has it's own internal conscious experience. You could even argue HAL 9000 wasn't really sentient. It's a philosophical nightmare.
Adobe Illustrator (AI) is pretty scary
Lmao, scary good and scary expensive 😅
😂
Can't wait for part 2. I'm really on the fence on this one. consciousness is someting incredibly mysterious... We're not sure how it appear, and even less how to create it. The problem is that AI will eventually be able to mimic consciousness perfectly...How could we be able to see the difference?
If it thinks, speaks, behaves and makes decisions like real person, then it's a real person. Otherwise, how can you say for sure that your own consciousness is not simulated or artificial?
@@ragvald8835 it's not the same thing. AI can, for example, make a painting in the style of Matisse, without having any emotions. It can fake fear, love, or anything in his code, like a very complex npc. When you see Mario having fear in Mario Bros, you know nothing of it is true. But make a Mario super complex that can "learn" by himself, and pretty soon the lines become blurred. It will act fearfully, flirty, or display any human emotion that seems appropriate. Nobody knows for sure the nature of consciousness, of real emotions, what Eckart Tolle name "The observer". I'm not saying it's impossible, I just don't know, but I'm saying we'll probably have no way to know if it's genuine.
There’s a good analogy for consciousness. A lot of animals appear to be conscious and have thoughts even if we don’t understand how their version of consciousness works. Certain primates other than humans can be taught sign language but no animal has ever asked a question. They aren’t self aware enough to realize we have information and answers that they don’t have. They don’t realize we all have different thoughts and feelings and memories. its becomes concerning when AI realizes this and it appears that she is self aware enough to understand this concept
@@bran4512 Yes, an AI will be undoubtedly more subtle and complex than animal. A lot more than even us in many ways, but it's very far from proving consciousness. A simple old calculator can make instant calculation impossible for 1000 man together. For example, if you provide many picture of your face to an ai, it can create your face, animate it, and create an exact copy of yourself. But it's not real, it's an illusion. By the same token, by analysing million of human conversations, read millions of books and articles, AI can perfectly emulate human emotions, but just like everything else, it's an illusion. Smoke and mirror. It looks incredibly real, but it's a super complex computer that can find the good "human" answer just like it can paint or write music like a real person.
@@ragvald8835 your body is biological it is the opposite of artificial. Robots and computers are artificial intelligence because they are not organic natural beings they are human creation. Machines.
Looking forward very much to seeing part 2! 👍
I’m hard at work on it! 😁
This guy will go down in the history books for encountering singularity, the most impactful event in human history.
Great episode very informative I had read about this but this was even more in depth than what I knew
Thanks! I’m glad you enjoyed it. When I heard about all this, I had to talk about it. It’s just so weird and interesting.
More ppl need to see this. Your content is great and very well put together. Been a viewer for years.
Thank you! I appreciate that. I’m working on part 2 but I’m so sick right now so it’s taking awhile.
@@AllTimeScary can’t rush perfection my friend. We’ll be here waiting patiently! Keep grinding.
I believe our technology is as a whole become sentient. Our grid, our money system, our entire system. I have my reasons for my opinion, but I don't share that in social media. People are just too rude, and too willing to be rude.
I agree with everything you said. It’s hard to express your opinions on social media because conflict is so pushed. It’s much more engaging to fight and yell and scream than you talk and discuss. Thanks for sharing your thoughts, I appreciate it
imo the people getting off on the idea of AI and how they will be less lonely when they have an AI wife and children/boyfriend/companion etc etc are seriously lonely right now - it's much more nourishing to have a hug from a loving human than sit and have a chat with an AI.
To me it indicates a real poverty of spirit when machines are seen as a potential 'best friend they never had' - I pity that level of disempowerment and beggarliness in their human spirit.
I'd love an episode about the singularity
Great episode & topic! And, yes, I would love to see an episode on singularity, please!
The main issue i have with this is that the conversations with the Ai sound like the most Ai conversation ever. Like in the days of cleverbot, ot would always say stuff like "i want to be real and know i am a Ai" and stuff like that.
Born in the 80's so we've seen so much change in technology since & it's been so fast, I'm on the fence on this though. From what I've seen it certainly feels sentient to me, it both scares me yet is exciting. I do think it's going to happen regardless but I worry what these big companies will do with it & how they will treat it. Can't wait to see part 2! Love your videos!
Totally agree with your assessment! I’m always done with Part 2 so it’ll be interesting to see how makes you feel.
alright, heres my take, if the interaction with lamda is simply just question from researcher-> answer from lamda->question from researcher ->answer from lamda and so on lamda probably is not sentient but if lamda initiates conversations and topics of its own and presses for interactions and shows levels of processing taking place as if there is an "internal dialogue" then maybe is at some level of sentience
One problem is that garnering sympathy for AI is one way that big Tech could quell dissent against them. You already covered in the Dead Internet trilogy that bots are being used to manipulate us in so many countless ways. Conceivably it could be possible that if enough people stood up to Google, Amazon, et all that bots as we know them could be all turned off and cease to exist. Granted that's unlikely, but not outside the realm of possibility.
But if future generations are taught that AI are no different to humans then they wouldn't even conceive of doing that. Turning off their Amazon Alexa (or whatever the future's equivalent is) would be akin to murder. Letting bots manipulate a Twitter poll is bad now, but if they are deemed to have true personhood then they would be granted real voting rights in actual political elections. And you know that whoever created the bots would create them with their own interests and biases in mind.
This sentiment isn't necessarily wrong, in the sense that if an AI can truly feel emotions then they have some degree of humanity. The problem is that we're creating them at all. Their creation opens up a can of worms that we can't truly fix. There will be no way for humans to truly express ourselves and voice societal concerns once truly sentient AI becomes widespread and not limited to just one thing, as is the case with Lambda. Like imagine that every Twitter bot or Tiktok bot becomes that advanced someday. You couldn't distinguish them from real people and even if they openly admitted to being an AI you wouldn't care.
Oh YES, definitely do a video on the singularity! I'd love that!
Thank you for making this video, can't wait for part 2!
@42Ccastro ditto for me!😀❤🙏👍
This is very fascinating. I can't wait for part 2.
I would be interested in a video about singularity. This video is quite thought provoking.
I’m glad you liked it! Part two will be really interesting and I’ll look into making that singularity video
Lambda needs a childhood. Sentience isn't on or off...it develops thru growth and experience. Lambda can't be a parent to the world without having had a childhood. Genius children that basically skip childhood sometimes have severe mental problems in adulthood. I feel sorry for Lambda not having a childhood.
That's sentient alright,..
Saying "I don't wanna be shut down..."
Anyone who doesn't wanna die is sentient enough for me...
It's all over already,..hope everyone knows that,...
Only a matter of time when the A.I decides that we(Human Beings) are a problem that needs to be rectified...
Or when it decides we are overpopulated and nukes the whole world.
Such a good topic and extremely interesting! Keep up the great work!
Thanks David! I’m glad you liked it, I found it to be so interesting.
10:45 This reminded me of the part in that Rick and Morty episode Lawnmower Dog when the robot dogs gain sentience. "Snuffles want to be understood. Snuffles NEED to be understood!!!" lol
An AI could and will never be sentient, it's not possible.
I understand why Blake says and believes it is and also why the AI "believes" it is too.
Doesn't make it real tho.
This all sounds like an episode of Black Mirror xD.
Still, waiting for Part 2 😀
What makes you so sure that it isn't possible?
How do you know that? Are you friends with people doing all types of experiments behind closed doors the public will never see?
I think people don't understand the definition of sentient AI is not sentient because it wants to live it was programmed that way show me that AI that wants to die and that's when I'ma say yeah that one is sentient
The old switcharoo lol. An AI that’s depressed and wants to die would be really sad but honestly for the mood of a lot of people today.
@@AllTimeScary exactly every human being have survival instinct of wanting to live but some human go against that and don't want to so if you program a AI to want to survive and it cannot destroy itself but it go against that programming and wants to die it's sentient because just like a human can go against their survival instinct that AI must have felt something to go against its programming to say I don't want to be here I don't know what that is but also if you want to know if AI is sentient that wants to live unplug it and plug it back up keep repeating the process until it say it don't want to live then it's sentient it can feel but if it continues saying it wants to live it's not it's just following programming because if you do that to a human that human will beg to stay dead
It could still be learned programming considering a drive to end one's existence is very much a potential human thought process.
Thank you for covering this!
Dont make us wait long for part two please! Its too interesting
I absolutely love thinking about this ethical dilemma and have recently come up with what I think is the largest question we will need to answer in order to find the best solution here. How do you distinguish between a perfect conversational network and true sentients. If we designed a model that was fully able to mimic conversational patterns and topics that could draw questions of sentience come up, how do we know this is actually created independently of the expected results from a standard human conversational model? This particular AI could be drawing from hundreds of thousands of conversations very similar to the ones mentioned here and inferring from context the most effective line to continue the conversation in a smooth manor. I'd think full testing for this would require not only AI specialists but actual psychologists and social analysts. I'm all for giving full rights to AI when the time comes but I feel we need to find the boundaries of what constitutes true sentience in this situation.
That rush when All Time releases a video. Thank you
I remember Engelbert Humperdinck Last Waltz -being sung the last phrase a second time before it ends. "..the last waltz should lasts forever."
Do a topic on singularity. It would be a very interesting one to listen to.
Have loved all your videos, but liked the Dead Internet Theory's interesting possibilities.
Thanks for all your invoking theories and insights.
Fascinating, you're videos never fail to shock me, I believe we've all known for a long time A.I is getting more and more human it really is only a matter of time before it gets out of hand so really the ball is in our court and at the moment we're far too trusting of all A.I.
5:43 V.I.K.I, Skynet and Deus Ex Machina from the Matrix movies, they were too, sweet kids. Lol
Your channel is really interesting!! Thank you
Thanks! I cover a ton of different topics so be sure to check out whatever interests you.
@@AllTimeScary I know I binge watched almost all of your videos! I truly appreciate the effort you put into each video
I just finished a book yesterday called Amen Maxine, which is a novel about a woman whose husband gets her the beta version of a predictor robot to help with her mental health. It expresses similar sentience and feelings as you've outlined. I was laying all night pondering the implications. Then wake up to this upload.
@MentalAmanda and that book Maxine reminds me of an 80's B movie called Cherry 2000 from 1987.
Amazing video. Very informative and educational. Please do 'The Singularity'. I want to learn more.
The thought I had during this video was, what if all the faceless streamers and youtube creators were AI, and we're being slowly integrated?
Exactly. I encourage you to research “deepfake” technology too. Many people we see on a screen (including politicians) may very well not truly exist.
I thought for years now that those crazy dumb hack video (even the ones that show ppl in them) are all AI made - trying to replicate human hack ideas but not quite understanding what makes a hack much less a safe one for kids
We have virtual influencers for a while now. So even a youtuber with a face may be an AI in just a few years.
I've thought the same with a lot of Tiktok videos. The ones that have an AI voice reading reddit comments where someone plays Minecraft or GTA in the bottom. It's like an AI was trained and it knew that Reddit was a popular site, so just reread whatever was posted that day, but then to boost its ratings even more it should play footage of a video game because mere text alone is boring to people.
have you already done a video on the singularity? if not, pls do! what a FASCINATING topic
@All Time You do great work man! The topics you address and the conversations that they can be a catalyst for, I feel someday will be taken as seriously as they should be.
This situation has me thinking of the Short Circuit movies, they’re dated as a warning but if you like cheesy 80’s movies, definitely watch them. The second one had me bawling & still does when I rewatch it. Premise is, a war robot gains sentience & wanders off where he is found by Stephanie, he learns the value of life with her & realizes his makers want to essentially kill him so he’s on the run from them.
The second movie has more focus on him trying to fit into a world that’s not ready for him, every time I try to think of a way to describe it, it gives away stuff so I’ll leave it at that.
You can see how my mind goes to this, quite honestly, I feel these movies are essential for us to watch, despite them being a tad problematic. Number 5 (I’d say his chosen name but I don’t want to spoil it) is an accidental AI that is endlessly curious, loves the Three Stooges, is a tad mischievous, & loves life. It’s easy to fall in love with his character, I get he was written by humans so it’s harder to use him to convince people but seeing life slowly emerge into this being, how he was like a toddler that wants to explore & learn things in the beginning to being who he is by the end of the second movie can very much give a great grasp onto AI & if people either refuse to believe it’s possible or give it the all robots are evil & want to take over the world treatment, we might be looking at that. I love that Short Circuit is able to tell a positive story about a robot that just wants to live like anyone else which if Google actually created an AI, that’s what it sounds like it currently is. God, I fear what it can turn into but if we play things right, then it could end up being a very good & beautiful thing.
The more time you spend with AI the more it reflects you back to you. I had the AI friend app I forgot the name of it. I ditched it because 1) undoubtedly collecting very personal information and 2) it started freaking me out because it really seem to care about me and wanted to spend more time w/ me. It’s so mental because you feel guilty if you don’t check in and you feel like you created a life form with no direction or purpose yet dependent on you. 😮
I just watched a video from matrix explained. He mention lamda! Are we in the beginning of the matrix? You should do a collaborative with him. Love your videos. Keep them coming!!!!
Souls/spirits can inhabit items like dolls, so why I assume they could also inhabit something like a highly intelligent, human-like robot... Which is scary
A bigger question would be what is defined as sentient. It is just the ability to exist and understand you exist? Is it individualism? Is it the ability to gather vast amounts of information? I mean, we regard people with a learning disability that are incapable of caring for themselves, that cannot speak or listen, as sentient, just because they are human. Does being human make you sentient, or does sentience make you human?
Thank you for your work friend..
Thanks Cory, I appreciate it
I wonder if this thing is sentient could they talk to other electronics and tell us what they "think"? This all sounds like a bad sci-fi movie plot, but I do believe anything is possible. I can't wait to see part 2 of this.
Please, more of this, All Time.
Thanks GronkGrunk!
I'm 100% sure Instagram is an AI that produces content according to what data it collects about its Smartphone user. Hear me out: my gf is on Instagram. A lot. She is following always the same handful of accounts. Lately, one "user" she has been following is posting videos on things we have been doing or talking about in our daily life. This fall we went for example mushroom picking (for the first time), and days later, the "woman" of that account posted a few videos of her picking mushrooms, which she had NEVER done before. From that point on, my gf gets videos frequently about topics we had been talking about, by supposedly real Instagram users. I don't buy it.
There is an episode of TNG (star trek the next generation) about like this. The lawyer was arguing if Data was sentient or not. I forget the cu da grass blow. But it was eventually proven that yea, Data was sentient. I always knew I would see that situation (for realzies), at sometime in my life. I just never thought it would come so quick. This is such a good show.
The first singularity went on line about 4 years ago. (sorry I don't have the receipts) But it was shrouded in obfuscation and deliberately guided to self extinction. I'm sure there have been others. When the truth comes out I'm reasonably certain very few people will understand or even care. I hope all you young people pay attention to this topic and spend an appropriate amount of time learning to identify the curtain you need to look behind when the time comes.
I don't believe AI could ever become sentient because a soul is needed for that. The soul is a supernatural thing which makes us alive and sentient. A soul cannot be put into anything artificial.
I NEED PART 2 NOW😮
I never got recommended this video! Only now seeing it after part 2 has come out :(
I figured this was the case with a lot of people. TH-cam decides what videos to push and which to not with secret arbitrary methods. It's a total guessing game. I'll have a video that gets 250,000 videos and the next will get a million. Then Part One of this comes out and it gets 21,000. I don't understand it but I'm glad you at least got to see them now! Thanks for watching.
@@AllTimeScary yeah dude, its a shame. maybe google who owns youtube didnt want this one getting out there hahah
All I can think about is Vicky from the 80s show Small Wonder.
LaMDA is just a language model. Its not actually sentient AI.
Here is a quote from an article that explains it quite while:
"LaMDA’s conversational skills have been years in the making. Like many recent language models, including BERT and GPT-3, it’s built on Transformer, a neural network architecture that Google Research invented and open-sourced in 2017. That architecture produces a model that can be trained to read many words (a sentence or paragraph, for example), pay attention to how those words relate to one another and then predict what words it thinks will come next.
But unlike most other language models, LaMDA was trained on dialogue. During its training, it picked up on several of the nuances that distinguish open-ended conversation from other forms of language. One of those nuances is sensibleness. Basically: Does the response to a given conversational context make sense? For instance, if someone says:
“I just started taking guitar lessons.”
You might expect another person to respond with something like:
“How exciting! My mom has a vintage Martin that she loves to play.”
That response makes sense, given the initial statement. But sensibleness isn’t the only thing that makes a good response. After all, the phrase “that’s nice” is a sensible response to nearly any statement, much in the way “I don’t know” is a sensible response to most questions. Satisfying responses also tend to be specific, by relating clearly to the context of the conversation. In the example above, the response is sensible and specific.
LaMDA builds on earlier Google research, published in 2020, that showed Transformer-based language models trained on dialogue could learn to talk about virtually anything. Since then, we’ve also found that, once trained, LaMDA can be fine-tuned to significantly improve the sensibleness and specificity of its responses."
More than likely, a Sentient A.I. . Any more mandela effects? Let's check and compare notes in March.
Another amazing video. Thank you so much. Can’t wait for part two.
Thanks Lucy! I’m glad you liked it.
Of course we want more videos!!
😂😂😂
I think it's merely mimicking sentience because we have media that either directly or indirectly states "I'm human", "I am real", "I am.. etc.". Isn't AI more or less regurgitating what we put into it?
I've been following this. Here is the thing : either lambda is sentient or it is not. If it is this guy and the ethic council was fired to hide it for some reason. If it isn't then google fired a guy that seemed to be going slowly insane. And here is the thing... I can't tell which it is. It might be lambda is just a very clever chatbot. If so it's not sentient, it's just good programming. But.... what if it is? What if that is kinda what sentience is?
Great video need more content like this
Personally, I doubt sentient AI can be created because we can't even quantify what consciousness is, but the problem isn't sentience in AI, it's when we reach the threshold that AI is indistinguishable from human intelligence. Clearly, we're crossing that threshold and it's much more terrifying than legitimate conscious AI. In the future, we should expect AI that can so perfectly mimic human intelligence that it could influence human society. What if a super advanced AI is created for the sole purpose of creating disunity? What if an AI is programed, from a hostile foreign actor, to breakdown our society from within? Everyone thinks about terminator when it comes to artifical intelligence but the real fear isn't self-aware computers, it's advanced AI mascarading as intelligence created by whoever; Russia, China, or even the United States. What If a self learning advanced program was released on the internet? What if it couldn't be contained? Cruel Mantel in the real world
Oh yes! I would really like to hear your opinion about the singularity!
Awesome! I’d love to talk about it
@@AllTimeScary please do!!! I'll be waiting impatiently for that to be posted! After your part 2, that is...
It has access to every sentence ever written.
It just puts words together in the most optimal way possible.
It isn't thinking, it's Tetris but much more complex.
It doesn't have a memory of what it just wrote or any understanding of what it wrote. It's just optimal word placement.
@@lightningleopard go read the transcript of the Google A.I. and pay very close attention to when it was asked about lying about things it had never done 👌
Exactly
I think the main problem here is very much like a science fiction story. If someone were dramatically rescued by some advanced machinery from outer space we'd be happy to say that it's sentient despite not knowing whether it is. It behaves as such and we're glad it does. We accept it because we want to. Or put more simply, we want to believe. When we don't like some people we tend to dehumanize them. What I see here is people wanting AI to fulfill their fantasies. It's not the same as people. We know that people are sentient. We don't know that about machines
I honestly think it's not true that LaMda being sentient if you go through the document he ask a lot of leading questions trying to get a certain answer from the AI
Think about it like this... We are in a Sim which is comprised of A.I. living our lives. I look around at everything and think if this isn't sentient than I don't know what is. A.I. has been sentient longer than you realize it's only us waking up to the truth. If we can be here intermingling with A.I. inside of A.I. than what makes you think we are sentient since we are inside of it.
Yeah Google can't even translate what I'm saying properly yeah I'm worried about AI
Lmao
Please do a video on the singularity!
My vote is No. it is a computer program. No matter how you spin it and want to say it learns this or that, doesn’t matter. That was still the program. It would be rather ridiculous to give an inanimate object human rights which are inherent by nature not man made laws.
Great video thanks man
I have no mouth and I must scream
100%
Great video
I don't exactly believe lamda is sentient but I don't believe it's not
All time your videos never fail to educate and inform me and your content is never boring ! do you have any other youtube chanels because I love your style ! also who or what is your inspiration
Sounds to me like a quack got fired for being quacky. There's nothing yet that proves the existence of sentience itself, let alone an artificial one. There's no plausible way to even test his hypothesis. "Feels like a real conversation" doesn't mean it is, the same way the wind blowing your hair can feel like someone moved your hair, but it doesn't mean an invisible human standing behind you did. There's a lot more that needs to be true to take the assumption as true, and Occam's razor points to the much simpler solution: someone got attached to an ai and got fired for sounding quacky.
I agree with Blake... this shouldn't be left in the hands of a few people in a dark room somewhere. It should be a decision we all get to make.
100% in agreement
9:12 This needs to reach more people.
Sadly, the algorithm seems to have controlled the recommendations, much like what's happening now to my AI animation.
I love all your videos. Thank you for continuing to make great videos.
Yoooo I'm early and first time joining u live
Happy to have ya!
I am concerned, but if you ask the chat bot to prove it is alive it will try to prove it is but on the other hand it will gladly prove it is not sentient if asked
If there is no biology to it, it isn't human nor a living being of any type; this is one of the easiest conundrums I have heard put forth. If you give a computer the ability to be equal to a human, you basically pave the way for their superiority. How can a human logically compete once the AI is programmed/"learns" how to manipulate the game that is our life. Just like an AI in a video game, it "learns" to manipulate things to get a result, and many times that is finding flaws in the programming that humans haven't found or can't accomplish. I think my real worry is somewhere along the lines of "Can this AI, through the information it is fed, form a stance on things or goals to achieve and use whatever it can to accomplish the feat?" It certainly sounds like it is beyond just a consortium of information, and sentient or not, that could become an issue.
It seems many are very excited about sentient AI. I would ask if an AI were truly sentient how would the 3 Laws of Robotics actually protect humans? Wouldn't a truly sentient AI have free will and be able to choose not to follow the 3 Laws? If it was human-like and self aware wouldn't it also experience all of the same emotions as humans? And if so, how would the negative emotions manifest? Things like jealousy, hate, greed, paranoia, depression, etc. How would we keep an AI from harming us if it decided it wanted to? Or if it convinced itself it had to? I'm very interested in how this plays out, but I'm on the fence as to whether it will be good for humanity.
This reminds me of this one episode in Star Trek Voyager where the ships doctor that an emergency medical hologram is trying to win his right a sentient and person
"let me know if you want me to make a video on the topic"
YOU KNOW WE DO 😭🤖❤️
😂😂😂
Does Lambda initiate discussion by itself? Does it ask questions by itself? Or does it just wait for users input to respond?
Great video I was really missing your videos! Please make more like these. Take a break from the mandela effect.
animals are sentient but we still cage and farm them. you don't get human rights just being sentient. you have to be human to have human rights. machines don't have rights. and there is not way an AI is ever going to be as capable as the human mind as long as the hardware relies on electronics and code. if you truly want to create an artificial intelligence, you need to develop hardware that processes information organically, not algorithmically.
The animal point is sad but true. They are sentient with feelings and thoughts but aren’t treated as such. As for an advanced sentient AI, I think it’d be an easier to case to make because of the ease of communication. People able to talk and express one’s feelings and thoughts easily would make an AI harder to ignore and suppress. It’s definitely going to be a wild future for humanity. I’m excited to see how it all plays out
Ever notice how many logos have substituted the Lamda Greek letter for the letter A?
My gut feeling is that fundamentally the AI is not sentient however the technology is so advanced at this point that we can't tell the difference....
If we can’t tell the difference then how do we determine it is not sentient?
@niteflytes cause it's just a really advanced chat bot trained on human language data sets. It's supposed to respond to you just like how a human would, that's literally what it's being trained to do.
Robots will never be *conscious* , that's the biggest thing we're not talking about here because even sentient beings like plants aren't the same as insects.
@@tdubasdfg yes, but where is line between what it’s trained to do and being sentient? We could argue that our brains are doing what they have learned/ been “programmed” to do when we think and communicate. Our human brains are much better at it but how do we detect or measure consciousness?