Top Rolex Terms | How To Speak Rolex | Crown & Caliber

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 92

  • @darood77
    @darood77 4 ปีที่แล้ว +142

    My favorite Rolex term is "waitlist".

  • @v1d300
    @v1d300 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The more I learn about Rolex, the more I love this brand. Thank you for filling in some gaps. I wished you had talked more about that and the other marketing campaigns, Hans Wilsdorf was a genius.

  • @phmwu7368
    @phmwu7368 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    3:11 some brands even have reference numbers sounding like international telephone numbers, some people even tried to phone these LOL 😆🤣😂

  • @MrVoayer
    @MrVoayer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice, interesting and funny lecture for novices and passers by ! Well done boys !

  • @igobyte
    @igobyte 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video. Thank you.

  • @underachievingwatchcollect1878
    @underachievingwatchcollect1878 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Rolex 904L steel is also referred to as Unobtainium!!!

  • @icyremy
    @icyremy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU!

  • @marcomanganazoshow419
    @marcomanganazoshow419 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video!! 👍🏻

  • @WatchSociety
    @WatchSociety 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Entertainment at its finest :)

  • @StuntpilootStef
    @StuntpilootStef 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for knowing how to pronounce the word specificity!

  • @scottallan3327
    @scottallan3327 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks ...I new some of that but not all..very well done, and GLASSES there not that bad lolol

  • @abdallah8686
    @abdallah8686 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you do a video highlighting the evolution of the explorer 2? When the reference number changed, when the bracelets changed, which serial numbers had the 3186, how many years tritium vs Luminova vs SuperLuminova last, etc? Thx

  • @NateTrucker92
    @NateTrucker92 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've known all of this for years, but I still enjoy these videos :)

  • @l5e2n9
    @l5e2n9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Vintage watch collecting still makes no sense to me. But I am an glad that there are people collecting and preserving historic timepieces.

    • @liamcluett1298
      @liamcluett1298 ปีที่แล้ว

      Often times vintage watches are cheaper and easier to obtain. Also styles have changed dramatically throughout the years so it's about whatever you like the most.

  • @motokult
    @motokult 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks

  • @okihaveaname
    @okihaveaname 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you trademark "cyclops"? Why do they confuse "automatics" with true watches with perpetual calendars?

  • @woomelo109
    @woomelo109 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video. Older sead-dwellers have no cyclops. Any others?

    • @CrownandCaliber
      @CrownandCaliber  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey romelo,
      You are correct. Up until the newest release Sea Dwellers did not have a cyclops because originally Rolex could not insure it would stay intact at the rated depths.

    • @sonudilli2450
      @sonudilli2450 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrownandCaliber and the current deep-sea too

    • @flynbonz
      @flynbonz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rolex Sea-dweller Deapsea does not have a cyclops.

  • @martin.B777
    @martin.B777 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    My Relox Nautilus Professional brought me here.😆

  • @billymania11
    @billymania11 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love this snobby Rolex stuff. For me it’s entertainment.

  • @chronomatica
    @chronomatica 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    3035, and 1570 are important too

  • @robertrico7598
    @robertrico7598 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Deep Sea has no cyclops

  • @xlnyc77
    @xlnyc77 ปีที่แล้ว

    is there a nickname for a rolex with an All bue bezel?

  • @edwardcollinson7942
    @edwardcollinson7942 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    out of curiosity, what is the watch on your wrist during the video??

  • @parker4878
    @parker4878 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    2:00 this is incorrect. The sea-dweller does not have a cyclops.

    • @melguezabal
      @melguezabal 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      This one does: ref 126600

    • @philmurphey2992
      @philmurphey2992 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      *deepsea*. www.rolex.com/watches/sea-dweller.html

    • @ZippyDChimp-mr1tf
      @ZippyDChimp-mr1tf 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      This one doesn’t www.rolex.com/watches/sea-dweller.html

    • @CrownandCaliber
      @CrownandCaliber  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not entirely RottenPJ. The current reference 126600 released in 2017 does have a cyclops. But any reference before would not. Thanks for watching.

    • @parker4878
      @parker4878 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes sorry, I meant the Deepsea specifically without the cyclops.

  • @dotover9013
    @dotover9013 ปีที่แล้ว

    The most important phrase ‘pistol whipped’ is what is best associated with Rolex.

  • @robertsullivan4773
    @robertsullivan4773 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a certified Rolex GMT Master II Black, G Serial I bought thru a reputable AD. Who in fact had taken the watch in trade. They sent it back to Rolex for a complete service at like $900. They then offered it to be as part of there estate sales section. The watch came with a two year warranty and all kinds of paper work and and insurance certificate as to value. There was a minor issue with it and within a month I sent it back to Rolex through the Ad. It came back and works great and has been slightly better Than +2 a day. My question is why doesn't my watch have the laser etched crown at the 6oclock position or anywhere else. By the way this only bothers me when someone like you guys mentions it as how it should be there. Love the watch and when I got it looked brand new.

    • @mrp9498
      @mrp9498 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I believe all pre 2002 watches don’t have the laser etched crown. Hope this helps you.

    • @CrownandCaliber
      @CrownandCaliber  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mr. Perpetual is correct, but a G serial would be a Ceramic GMT Master II 116710, so it should have it. It is probably on the crystal, they are just super difficult to find. AND since it went to Rolex for service there is a chance you have a "Service" LEC crystal which would have a tiny "S" in the coronet.
      A tip on locating the LEC. Shine a bright light from 12 o'clock across the crystal and then look from 6 o'clock, being careful to not look directly into the light. Also make sure you're using a loupe to magnify the LEC. Good luck!

  • @alexpedersen9942
    @alexpedersen9942 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Deepsea 126660 doesnt have a cyclops
    So not all rolex’ with a date function have a cyclops

  • @brucetheshark266
    @brucetheshark266 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Why do Rolex put all the attributes on the dial? Too much text! Would look much better without the crowded dial.

    • @martin.B777
      @martin.B777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Once they declutter the dial, the current models will skyrocket in price.🚀🤑😆

    • @covfefe8971
      @covfefe8971 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's the need to boast about what features they got.

  • @rodsalvador3608
    @rodsalvador3608 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm going to start calling my watch the Speedmaster Perpetual

    • @alwong604
      @alwong604 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Uhhh... no. It's a SpeedMaster Automatic or Professional? Be proud of what you wear. Omega's horological history is superior to Rolex.

    • @covfefe8971
      @covfefe8971 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alwong604 Omega is superior to Rolex in every way except marketing, and special editions.

  • @thrillingmolly9782
    @thrillingmolly9782 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    My 2019 chromalight is still green, any ideal why?

  • @garysmith1477
    @garysmith1477 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No cyclops on older Rolex Sea Dweller 😋

  • @japd7897
    @japd7897 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Outcast: people not to be offered steel sports models (me).

  • @haroon420
    @haroon420 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why isn’t the Kermit ( a submariner) also an oyster watch? I thought all water proof watches were also oyster watches?

  • @samleno2630
    @samleno2630 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not all Rolex watches with a date have a cyclops.

  • @MattFeige11
    @MattFeige11 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How did you not mention President or Oyster Bracelet??!!

  • @gmshadowtraders
    @gmshadowtraders 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No wrist watch check?! I'd laugh if it wasn't a Rolex, lol

  • @gzmo0
    @gzmo0 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Y'all pointing out the sea dwellers and deepseas with no cyclops... Cellini sitting there like 👁️👄👁️

  • @petervannoort5158
    @petervannoort5158 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not every Rolex has a Laser Etched Coronet. My James Cameron doesn't. I went to the Rolex shop and yes, it was genuine and no, it didn't have one. They said not all af them have one. Especially the latest versions with the crown on the dial on 6 o'clock.

    • @samuelspiker3587
      @samuelspiker3587 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it started in 2018 i believe, so if you have an older model that would make sense.

  • @evillinguist
    @evillinguist 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    116600 do not have any cyclops 😄

  • @queensbuilt-timewilltell8200
    @queensbuilt-timewilltell8200 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Some sea dwellers have no cylcops on dates right? Just checking... unless I bought a fake.

  • @sofluid
    @sofluid 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well the statement about all Rolex watches with a date having a cyclops is not so. Case in point the sea-dweller deepsea with the extra large case. 😁

  • @ArchDuke_JD
    @ArchDuke_JD ปีที่แล้ว

    meh nvm... at this rate the next video will ask me to sleep with the AD reps to boost my chances lol

  • @ebolummordi5488
    @ebolummordi5488 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Note not every Rolex with a date has a cyclops - deepsea

  • @Blue_3rd
    @Blue_3rd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rolex vocabulary: skinny handset, silly cyclops, dial full o’ text.

  • @gregsnavely9272
    @gregsnavely9272 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    no cyclopes over a seadweller...i just trolled you.

  • @chrisfetner332
    @chrisfetner332 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BS spider and tropical no go.

  • @dedu7483
    @dedu7483 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rolex sea dweller dont have cyclopes over date

  • @dukeofpearl
    @dukeofpearl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I know how to speak Rolex!........DON’T BUY ONE!!! Buy an Omega. 🕶✌🏻

  • @nunyabizness199
    @nunyabizness199 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hmmm, Rolex bump.

  • @Youcantleavethisempty01
    @Youcantleavethisempty01 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video! Unpopular opinion - Rolex model nicknames are tacky and don't fit the elevated brand identity. Sorry not sorry!

    • @CrownandCaliber
      @CrownandCaliber  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey! We love people sharing their opinions. Thank you!

    • @Youcantleavethisempty01
      @Youcantleavethisempty01 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrownandCaliber Muah!

    • @natfingerboard
      @natfingerboard 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      yep, I find them very childish

    • @robertsullivan4773
      @robertsullivan4773 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've been told that Rolex just tolerates them and doesn't refer to the nicknames in house.

  • @townievision
    @townievision 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    meh

  • @nutashkotwal8955
    @nutashkotwal8955 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rolex strapped to her neck?????

    • @CrownandCaliber
      @CrownandCaliber  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha yep, Nutash kotwal! Think more like a necklace rather than a choker.

  • @IndyPop24
    @IndyPop24 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Feedback: NEVER do the old “oh, I didn’t see you there” nonsense. Super lame.

    • @MrZepharus
      @MrZepharus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Pretty sure he was doing it ironically...

  • @covfefe8971
    @covfefe8971 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rolex, Rolex, Rolex ....... Not only are there more luxurious watches, technically superior watches, better pedigreed watches, watches that are bred from actual watchmakers, watches that were BUILT in-house, Rolex watches are butt ugly. It turns a watch that should cost no more than $4,000 into $10-12,000+. I guess there really is a sucker born every minute. Yes, I am here to troll Rolex, not Crown and Caliber.

  • @MrZZooh
    @MrZZooh 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks. Rolex is overrated and overpriced.