Hi, not so easy to understand, but hopefully easier with the video ! I'm still wondering, when do you use this kind of join, versus a lock join for example ? thank you !
If you've never done one before or are new to tatting, practicing and actually 'doing' are very helpful to your understanding as you can then see what the threads are doing. The CWJ can be used when you're working any join that uses a separate thread for the working thread - as in a chain or mock ring; it can't be used for a true ring as the working thread is also the loom thread. The CWJ join allows the core thread to slide after the join is made, where a LJ makes a knot - meaning our core thread won't slide anymore. If you used a LJ at the top of your onion ring, you wouldn't be able to close the mock ring because of the knot. I hope that helps you!
Hello, I hope I'm not bothering you with my questions. I'm really trying to understand the logic of it just from watching rn and, I guess, this technique is like normally making the stitches (one first half and one second half) but you can only use and manipulate the shuttle thread, not the core thread (the role of which is transferred to the picot(?)); so the consequent loops are just in service of making the stitches in a slightly different way? So one question of mine is, if you didn't use the official core thread at any point through this technique, shouldn't it be shown in the back or somewhere, as it would be left uncovered?Am I missing something here that makes my view false, because in your finished result the core thread cannot be seen from anywhere(neither front nor back), even though you didn't include it (I think) in that "Catherine wheel join" part. Do you believe you understand the movement of the techniques better when you try them yourself? Your opinion and light of knowledge on these would be much helpful. Answer me if and whenever you want, have the time or be in the mood to do so. Byee:)
Honestly, I don't believe 'just watching' helps. Personally I learn so much more, and understand a LOT better if I do it. The Catherine Wheel join is a tricky one to wrap your head around by 'just watching' - I politely suggest you try it as your understanding will greatly benefit from doing so. 😊
All of your techniques seem genious and amazing to look at! Did you figure them out by yourself, were u taught from someone else or some other source? I wonder if anyone knows who invented all these techniques. Do you or anyone else knows? Anyway good job continue doing it if it makes u happy I like it :) Bye, Christina :)
Thank you! None of the techniques are mine, I have learnt from videos and books. If I know who invented the technique I always credit them in my video.
Thankyou, I finally understand how to do the Catherine Wheel join properly. You video is so easy to follow.🥰
Thank you! I'm so pleased it helped you.🙂
Thank you for using two colors of thread. This is a wonderful explanation of how to make this join!
So glad you liked it! Thank you
Awesome! very well explained and demonstrated. Thanks so much🥰🤗
Thank you!
Thank you so much for your tutorials! I love them!! 🙏💕
Thank you! So glad you like them.
What a beautiful join!
I agree!!😊
Wonderful video. Just subscribed to your channel. You “can “ teach old dogs new tricks!!🌹🌹
Awesome! I'm glad you liked the video. Enjoy🙂🙂
Fantastic thank you very much. Perfect explanation and image.
Thank you! So glad you liked it
Hi, not so easy to understand, but hopefully easier with the video ! I'm still wondering, when do you use this kind of join, versus a lock join for example ? thank you !
If you've never done one before or are new to tatting, practicing and actually 'doing' are very helpful to your understanding as you can then see what the threads are doing.
The CWJ can be used when you're working any join that uses a separate thread for the working thread - as in a chain or mock ring; it can't be used for a true ring as the working thread is also the loom thread.
The CWJ join allows the core thread to slide after the join is made, where a LJ makes a knot - meaning our core thread won't slide anymore. If you used a LJ at the top of your onion ring, you wouldn't be able to close the mock ring because of the knot.
I hope that helps you!
Wow👏👏👏
Thanks!
Hello, I hope I'm not bothering you with my questions. I'm really trying to understand the logic of it just from watching rn and, I guess, this technique is like normally making the stitches (one first half and one second half) but you can only use and manipulate the shuttle thread, not the core thread (the role of which is transferred to the picot(?)); so the consequent loops are just in service of making the stitches in a slightly different way?
So one question of mine is, if you didn't use the official core thread at any point through this technique, shouldn't it be shown in the back or somewhere, as it would be left uncovered?Am I missing something here that makes my view false, because in your finished result the core thread cannot be seen from anywhere(neither front nor back), even though you didn't include it (I think) in that "Catherine wheel join" part.
Do you believe you understand the movement of the techniques better when you try them yourself?
Your opinion and light of knowledge on these would be much helpful.
Answer me if and whenever you want, have the time or be in the mood to do so.
Byee:)
Honestly, I don't believe 'just watching' helps. Personally I learn so much more, and understand a LOT better if I do it. The Catherine Wheel join is a tricky one to wrap your head around by 'just watching' - I politely suggest you try it as your understanding will greatly benefit from doing so. 😊
@@NooBearAus Okeyy, that stands, practise and doing really brings you closer to understanding. Thanks :)
All of your techniques seem genious and amazing to look at! Did you figure them out by yourself, were u taught from someone else or some other source?
I wonder if anyone knows who invented all these techniques. Do you or anyone else knows?
Anyway good job continue doing it if it makes u happy I like it :)
Bye,
Christina :)
Thank you! None of the techniques are mine, I have learnt from videos and books. If I know who invented the technique I always credit them in my video.
@@NooBearAus Thank you for responding :)!
Grazie
You're welcome