Casio F105 vs W86 - Which is the true F-91W successor?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ต.ค. 2024
  • Comparing the Casio F105W against the Casio W86. These two Casio watches are often referred to as being the successor to the classic F-91W. According to the source, some say that the F-105W is the successor but others say that it is the W-86-1VQES, but they can't both be right. By taking a deeper look and comparing the watches, we find out which is the better watch and which one is the true F-91W true successor.
    Get these watches on Amazon (Affiliate Links)
    ======================================
    USA: amzn.to/473iPbM
    UK: amzn.to/40s50Bc
    This channel is a member of the Amazon Affiliate Program and will earn a small commission when purchased through these links. It does not cost you any extra and any commission earned will be used to help keep the channel running.

ความคิดเห็น • 72

  • @F22Steve
    @F22Steve 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

    I have both. Problem solved😀

    • @nevergonnadie420
      @nevergonnadie420 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How do you like the w86?

    • @i.q_music
      @i.q_music 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have the 86

  • @darioswatchclub8
    @darioswatchclub8 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    2:10 The Man Knew! Both Casios are Kings!

  • @CG-gr8xk
    @CG-gr8xk 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Loved my F-91W but picked up a W-86 when the strap broke and it's a great replacement. Bought a second one just in case it gets taken off the market.

    • @i.q_music
      @i.q_music 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I want to do the same

    • @kurukiddo
      @kurukiddo 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Lucky you. I can't find it anywhere :/

    • @H4554Nx
      @H4554Nx วันที่ผ่านมา

      Which country ​@@kurukiddo

    • @kurukiddo
      @kurukiddo 18 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      @@H4554Nx US :D

  • @IR4TE
    @IR4TE 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    This video made sure that I made the right choice with the W-86, should arrive tomorrow. :D

    • @F22Steve
      @F22Steve 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You won’t regret it. It’s a great watch.

    • @dajetset
      @dajetset 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I thought the w86 was discontinued? Where did you find one?
      Can you please share the link? Thank you.

    • @billymillieandlolafunvideo4915
      @billymillieandlolafunvideo4915 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@dajetsetargos have them

  • @albert09
    @albert09 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I have the both of them. And I have no complaints with either.great watches.

  • @bdub8442
    @bdub8442 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I have 1572 model of the f105 it was my dads and now it’s mine replaced straps and battery but other than that works and still looks new. Such a great watch

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nice that you have the one with the 1572 module.

  • @elmania123
    @elmania123 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The F-105 was the first watch I bought myself with allowance as a kid in 1993. So it will always have a special place in sentimentality for me. You can't go wrong with any of the electro lit watches. I've been trying to track down a W-86 before they are completely gone however. Hopefully the F-105 sticks around for longer.

  • @tigersgedanken1246
    @tigersgedanken1246 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    i like the f105 more because it is slightly slimmer

  • @wastedaga1n
    @wastedaga1n หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Agree! F-105 is the watch!! I drunken bought one in wal-mart last year. Fast foward.. showed my pal this today. It's keeping the exact time i put in a year ago. went to the gov time website. blown away. I'm sure it's a casio lottery with quartz.... Maybe. Bro, This or the GMWB5000D-1 might be the best watch EVER!

  • @MuhammadfromPakistan
    @MuhammadfromPakistan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The true F91 W successor is the W 218 1B, bassically u get the g shock DW 5600 for £16 but with F91 W features.

    • @ChandravijayAgrawal
      @ChandravijayAgrawal วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      now looks like i am reaching towards right answer

  • @jmr5707
    @jmr5707 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    w86's are getting hard to come by. For the same price, you may as well keep going to the new w218h or w219h. Even bigger, and probably better, than ALL mentioned here. The true successor to the f-91... which pretty much pales in comparison to everything, at this point. Also seems to be a low-fi alternative to the G-Shock to boot.
    This being said, I'm very happy with my 105w. Fits better than the 91... smoother around shirt cuffs, looks better... etc.
    Lotsa' choices with Casio , between $15-$25 usd. Good times😉👍

  • @Traderhorn
    @Traderhorn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have just bought two new W86 with one as a spare,it’s a very nice watch and has it really been discontinued ?, nice video thanks and have subscribed.

  • @steven3379
    @steven3379 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thanks for the comparison, I'm thinking about a new G - Shock purchase now! I just can't make up my mind! 😂

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      which G-Shock were you thinking of?

    • @steven3379
      @steven3379 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wristaction well either a new Rangeman, or a 40th Anniversary all metal square... I can't make up my mind also I kinda like the negative display too. 😏

  • @a.juchter
    @a.juchter 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Thank you for this review.
    I agree that the w86 is the better watch.
    And i also agree with David Icke....

  • @Dynamics_Watch_Reviews
    @Dynamics_Watch_Reviews 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice video (have subscribed)
    Thanks for uploading, interesting comparison

  • @mohammedtaqi391
    @mohammedtaqi391 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a F-91W and A163, awesome watches. Very accurate time. And I just bought the W-86 got it on a offer of £11.99

  • @ericmshan
    @ericmshan หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The only difference between old 1572 module and 3298 is the calendar end date. 1572 calendar only goes to year 2039 and 3298 goes to year 2099.

  • @SaibaKeiosu
    @SaibaKeiosu 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The "legit check" has already been copied by clone manufacturers and has not been a reliable way to find the diff between a real vs fake for a fairly long time now.

  • @nathanaelsmith3553
    @nathanaelsmith3553 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have a W86 but no turquoise track suit.

  • @dhammikawijayasiri7850
    @dhammikawijayasiri7850 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Old module didn't display the electronic CASIO sign

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dhammikawijayasiri7850 thanks for the information

  • @RjayUA
    @RjayUA 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I really want to buy a W-86, but they don’t sell it in my country (( Ebay & Amazon they will be very expensive due to expensive delivery.

    • @lostsailor2498
      @lostsailor2498 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same here. $17 for an F105, vs $50 for a W86.

    • @RjayUA
      @RjayUA 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lostsailor2498 A friend bought it for me at Argos on sale for £11.99. I'll have them soon.

  • @dannygutz15
    @dannygutz15 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just got a f-105 cause I wanted to try a Casio I plan on buying a GAB 2100 soon tho

  • @starshiplazyboy475
    @starshiplazyboy475 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'd like to give the W86 a try, but I can't find them for less than $45 and that's a bit rich when I could get a G-shock DW5600 for just a bit more money.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree, that is far too much. In the UK you can get it well under the equivalent of $20

    • @starshiplazyboy475
      @starshiplazyboy475 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wristaction it’s totally worth it at that price.

  • @nikossiotas
    @nikossiotas 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do they have differences in time when they use the same module ?
    Strange...
    Did you store them in different temperature humidity conditions or near a magnet ?
    As for the older module i guess they changed it for cost cutting or maybe the calendar wasn't going till 2099. But the older module was more accurate.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      the accuracy difference is common, I'm guessing that's it's to do with the quality of the quartz crystal used. I have subsequently learned that there have been 3 different modules used: 1275 / 1572 / 3298 and thanks for pointing out that the older module was more accurate.

  • @mrnexus8seven949
    @mrnexus8seven949 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    W86 for me, I prefer the look, build and the colours.

  • @mohammedsalman525
    @mohammedsalman525 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    W-86 buy link plz.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      www.argos.co.uk/product/2533609?clickSR=slp:term:casio%20w86:8:60:1
      I can't find a site outside of Europe that sells it for a reasonable price unfortunately.

  • @ashab1
    @ashab1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Those pins are a lot stronger than any bars, the strap will rip before those pins bend.

  • @eduardoromero5629
    @eduardoromero5629 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    the problem with the w86 is that it's very scarce, and the price then is high-60 dollars. and though i love that watch, im not sure i'd pay that much for a watch that simple. only for collectors, i guess

    • @IR4TE
      @IR4TE 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I found a deal with a german seller for about 25€

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree that it's not worth paying above retail unless you're a collector. It seems to be more readily available in Europe than the rest of the world.

    • @NoNonsenseJohnson
      @NoNonsenseJohnson 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s in UK Argos for £16 British pounds

    • @ashab1
      @ashab1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The F105 is scarce in the Uk it costs around £28 imported from the U.S the W86 can be had for between £11-£18

  • @johnvelas70
    @johnvelas70 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My dad havsa 16yo a188 w/ a 1572, battery life 10 years w/ alarm set to 0600. He swims at the Y in it.

  • @jasong1033
    @jasong1033 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I personally prefer the F-105 due to the blue colour on the watch face..... There isn't that much difference between the two.

  • @hectorfigueredo6613
    @hectorfigueredo6613 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gracias por tu vídeo 👍🇨🇴🕓🇪🇸👍

  • @zorro7572
    @zorro7572 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    beautiful watches

  • @davidcrandall4958
    @davidcrandall4958 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The W217!!

  • @antonixyz8575
    @antonixyz8575 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I just hunted used w-86 i very good condition . My daily casio is f-108 but w86 has better wp and fantastic light

  • @K0MBIAN
    @K0MBIAN หลายเดือนก่อน

    Successor? AFAIK, F-91 isn't discontinued...

  • @borosadam3199
    @borosadam3199 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    5:25 w59?

  • @venkatareddytadi9755
    @venkatareddytadi9755 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    is w86 available in india

  • @Clovud
    @Clovud 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wish I had bought one before they discontinued it

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's true that it's no longer available on the Casio website. You can get the W86 from Argos website if you're in the UK.

  • @HansYolo82
    @HansYolo82 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Imo both are ugly, i stay with the f91 wich has the better display, i can swim in a lake without problems and the light is not the best but its enough in darkness and the charm of the f91 is undeniable

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree that the F91 has the better display. You only notice the difference when you put one of these watches alongside it though.

  • @ChefTom777
    @ChefTom777 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    for me I will pick f105 it is more slee & the w86 is very expensive not worth it..

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The W86 is expensive in America. In the UK it is only £17 and the F105 is more. Appreciate your opinion.

  • @splashmoby
    @splashmoby 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I chose W86 because ... David icke.. lizard people!

  • @KaushikBala333
    @KaushikBala333 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    None i guess. F91w is in its own league

  • @zillsburyy1
    @zillsburyy1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    taliban loves that watch

    • @davidcrandall4958
      @davidcrandall4958 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So does the Pope! Which is worse?