Alhamdullillah. Waooo! Interesting to hear from your perspective. Your way of looking other side of the coin is amazing while everyone is looking only one side for a coin for 1400 year. Great presentation. Keep on good work and May Allah reward you. ❤️it
Thank you ALLAH for leading me to this brother,as I read the Quran I questioned too many times and I asked ALLAH for an explanation and I found your video,so I sat and listened and so far I love how you explained,Alhamdulillah.. Jazak ALLAH Khairan brother
The best thing about your lecture is that you highlight important points which really helpful for those who want to do research on the particular topic of QURAN. Thanks 🙏 😊 .
Salamun alaikum brother Al Moses. Thank you very much indeed for this great work. May God (Allah) bless you and your good intention in helping us understand our only source of divinely evidence-based knowledge, the Quran.
A good way to understand what is going on with the Story of Lut is just look at Russia and Ukraine conflict. When you understand the parallels between these 2 things then everything starts to make sense and definitions of words start to unravel themselves. Furthermore you start to understand who Ibrahim really was and how he fits into History. What is the significance of the era of Ibrahim and its connection to Musa & Eisa, etc Im glad you are opening up to the significance of the Chronology of Revelation over Cannonical arrangement of the Mushaf. There is an order that the Quran is meant to be read in, the distorted arrangement is what creates all the confusion.
Chronology of events as they exist in Quran for specific events, brother. Not the alleged revelation order of the Quran. They are two different things:)
@@AlMosesPhD You've taken the first step towards a greater destination that you may not have set out to embark on. You'll start to realise that when you read these stories in Chronology of events that the Surahs start to align in order of Revelation. You are more likely to notice something that your are looking for than not or another way of saying this would be if you aren't looking for the Chronology of Revelation then you are less likely to notice it. You are on your own journey so I'll respectfully allow you to come to that realisation on your own. I apologise for trying to rush you.
@@reflectingrye4823 Quran wasn't revealed verse at a time it was revealed in entire Surahs. Otherwise how can the "Create 1 or 10 surah like it" be possible? Ashab ul Nazul is a fabrication to force certain meanings upon the verses of the Quran.
Assalam u Alaikum, I would like to ask about the rule set by Allah swt himself in Quran القرآن - سورۃ نمبر 4 النساء آیت نمبر 82 أَعُوذُ بِاللَّهِ مِنَ الشَّيْطَانِ الرَّجِيمِ بِسْمِ اللّٰهِ الرَّحْمٰنِ الرَّحِيْمِ اَفَلَا يَتَدَبَّرُوۡنَ الۡقُرۡاٰنَؕ وَلَوۡ كَانَ مِنۡ عِنۡدِ غَيۡرِ اللّٰهِ لَوَجَدُوۡا فِيۡهِ اخۡتِلَافًا كَثِيۡرًا ۞ As you mentioned about any specific terms used in Quran should be taken according to the context going on like you said for قوم here. I am Confused. Please respond.
1) Words selaamEN سَلَامًا and selaamUN سَلَامٌ in 51:25 are full sentences. We should ask: what kind of sentences, and is there any subject? Word selaam cannot be a greeting, cause of 25:75. 2) I couldn't find 'awaalim in the Qur'an, but on the same weight we have fewaakih, which is a plural of faakihet. So, 'awaalim should be a plural of 'aalimet (feminine active participle, also not used in the Qur'an) rather then of 'aalem.
The traditional understanding is that Salaman has a hidden verb, like nusalli salaman. But yes, you've hit on a point that does need more consideration
@@AlMosesPhD I think, and I'm quite sure, that selaamEN is a question and selaamUN its answer. I also think that this word expresses freedom given by "the other side", in a sense that their is no objection, hostility or anything that could prevent somebody to do something. So, this would be "Free? Free.", as a question are those guests free to enter with a positive answer. I was speaking with some elders in my people and heard that "selaam" was never used before on the street as a greeting, but "merhaba", and selaam people used when entering somebody's house or other objects. And, for 'aalemoon, I see that its meaning is "students" in a sense that they're people who're studying something in different ways, for example empirical and rational, in real life, dream, pondering, waHy, etc., and they're studying many or all life topics. On the other hand, one of the meaning of Rabb can be Teacher, which is a common meaning of Hebrew "ravi". So, Rabb-ul-'aalemeen could be The Teacher of the students.
Can you make a video drawing out just your conclusions? I'd prefer to watch that first and then watch this technical explanation. It is often easier to start out with your conclusion like with scientific articles, so that the viewer can have an idea of where the technical explanation is going which would actually assist with understanding.
Assalamu alaikum! In Surah Al-An'am 6:83-90, where 18 prophets are mentioned by their names, and Lut (AS) is also mentioned by name. So, what would you say?
SA, To me, the 'those are those given nubuwa' seems to refer to the generic target in the ayah before, and not the whole group that came before. There is a pattern in the earlier ayat where people are named and then summarized as the primary group they belong to, and then the listing process continues with more people and their grouping. As in Zakaria, Ilyas. Yahya, Isa are from saliheen. Then a new group and so forth But, I will downgrade the strength of my proposition in the next update, and continue to look at that section in detail.
Salamu Alaykum Of the 18 named, how many were given scriptures? The only ones given scriptures were Moses and Jesus. Jonah wasn't given Scripture, and neither was Elisha or Yahya. Why do you think they all were given prophethood? It doesn't say they all were given prophethood. It says they were given "Scripture, wisdom and prophethood", it doesn't say which were given what. [6:89] Those are the ones to whom We gave the Scripture, wisdom, and prophethood. Even if these people now disbelieve in them, We have entrusted them to others who do not disbelieve. Salam
great research n ponder brother, by sharing your personal method to do ur own research, so it may inspire other for how they do their own research too, great research n sharing brother ❤❤❤
Salamun Alaikum wa Rahmatullah. A few initial thoughts having watched the whole way through. Truly grateful for this presentation and the efforts you have gone to, to keep it clear and to the point. It was easy to follow along and even on a mobile it was easy to zoom on the screen ( your zooming helped as well, thank you!) The methodology and charts are amazing, including how you went through the ayaat and marked the (many!) questions, and it shows the diligence you have maintained and the reverence for Kitaab Allah. Mashallah walhumdulillah. Keen to learn more about the way you came to conclusions about the order of the story. Well worth the time following along for anyone with an open mind. Will definitely need to watch again a few times I think inshallah with the Qur'an open to go back and forth between the surahs to get a more solid understanding of the order of events, the terminology, your shared insights, and the questions raised and more. From a lay perspective, genuinely surprised this level of analysis is not the norm, inshallah this and MQ approach is changing this for the better for this generation. Question: the way you have presented the ayaat in order of events; am I right in understanding this is what you consider to be adhering to "wa rattililQuraana tarteela"? Finally, I'm reminded of Ibrahim (as) dua: Rabbana wab'ath feehim, rasoolan minhum, yatloo alayhim ayaatika, wa yuallimuhu al Kitaaba walHikmata, wa yuzakkeehim, innaka anta alAzeez alHakeem. Salamun Alaikum
Salaamun bro musa. ??? Off topic Q. Surah 2/2. Zaalikal kitab not hazal kitab. That book not this book ??is there other meaning of zaalika? Appear similar to kazalik. Sukran.
@@AlMosesPhD i really need your opinion/advance ilm. Say kitab is the taurat as per ahli kitab = ahli taurat. Probably surah 2/2 begins with addressing believer of taurat. How do we reconcile with surah 2/285, kutubihi?? Taurat and its continuation which is the quran?? Surah 2 begins with definition of muttaqin (them) and ends with definition of mukminun (us). It leads to anotherQ?? If it refers to taurat why it uses unnzila = gradual dissemination?? Why not nazala = one time delivery of complete book?? Sukran bro.
some questions while i listen: is there an ahl muhammad mentioned in the reading? i remember the verse "my lord, my people took this quran as a thing abandoned". is the verse suggesting muhammad was completely rejected by his community, a rejection worse than lut? and was muhammad's community completely annihilated? right now my country is going through the presidential elections and i like to share my thoughts. can ahl be seen as those followers who're basically from the lower classes, who go about putting up the party flags, banners and posters. people who perform simple yet necessary tasks. and ahl, they hold higher positions of the parties. people who're skilled with oratory, well versed in governing and law and people from societies aristocracy?
salaamun brother. u might know all of the following already but ... reminder is always beneficial for the mominoon ;-) 1. highly appreciate ur PhD humbleness in front of the quran towards the end of the vdo. its the key. please try to never lose sight of this. allah has chosen u for a massive task. agreed. just always keep the focus away from the words 'chosen' and 'you'... and keep the entire focus on the key phrase ' allah has'... and inshallah u will keep churning out intellectual gems and 'brain grenades' like this and most of ur quran work, to keep exploding in our heads for a long time to come. and repeatedly keep bringing us to our knees in front of the quran. 2. please never evaluate the quality/value/impact of ur work by the optics of the channel and the views etc... the mass neuron short circuiting u r carrying out for the quran, from the quran, is priceless and timeless. possibly because of its basis being entirely quranic. this stuff is opening up the quran like an escher print being turned into a 3d space or something way epicer !... mind bending and gorgeous at the same time. whatever u do, don't stop this work, even if there is 1 view. views don't equal baraka, sincerity sure does equal baraka, and u got a truckload of that coming out ur vazuza... ;-) thanks for catalyzing my quran journey and all prayers for baraka overload in ur journey inshalah..cheers.
Brother Moses. Salamun alikum. God bless you and through people like you, let Allah convey his message to people. Shaitaan has played his role enough and he will continue doing so, but with our tadabbur approach, and by using aqqal, we can find out the real message and follow the instructions of Allah (alone). Glad to see this kind of videos, very informative and with very nice presenation. Thanks a lot. Keep going...
Great work, brother. I am making notes from this lecture because the words you discussed and their meanings are very important to ponder. because our traditional scholars have slaughtered it 😢.
@suhanamullick9857 I do not make any special notes. I rewrite the plan for my own understanding. If you need notes, just listen and write what is important to remember and ponder or to reverify using dictionaries for your own satisfaction. I listen but follow only what my understanding can catch up on. That is my note! Thanks for reaching out to me.
@@AlMosesPhD i could not name who because i could not reconcile why lut is contemporary of ibrahim. But there sre prevalent themes in the quran, such as mindun nillah = no intermediary. Such as the quran from Allah hence its interpretation MUST use Allah vocabulary. I opine homosexuality might refer to Allah choices of using gender of words at his own fancy = not as per arabic grammar. Another prevalent theme is its uses descriptor to protect sanctity of instruction relays to the nabi/rasul. Lut was listed with ismail, ilyasa and yunus. By accident?? Nope!! Allah lines them up with intention. Then there are 4 salamuns to 4 nabi/ rasul. Nuuhin fil aalamin ibrahim, musa & harun and ilyaasin. ilyaasin?? Look like a descriptor, right?? This is my understanding. Sukran.
Pl enlighten us on Hajj as Surah Hajj starts with Alnnas ,not Muslims. Hope you comprehend what I try to learn. Then Aba ابا and ابو . Both with the same meaning.... Father? Zaka not what Mullas teach us? Yanfiqun ینفقون ...for distribution if in access of wealth? Looking forward to hearing from you pl. Regards
salaams. In sura 6 verses 83 to 89, the quran lists the prophets which include Lut. In verse 89 it says referring to all the prophets mentioned before as those to whom was given nubuwat which includes Lut
Very good point. I'll think it over. To me, it seems to refer to the ayah before, echoing the pattern in the earlier ayat where people are named and then summarized as the group they belong to before the list continues. As in Zakaria, Ilyas. Yahya, Isa are from saliheen. Then a new group and so forth 89 then refers to whoever is explicitly selected in ayah 88
Salaams. With due respect, we see that the Qur'an discussion is continuous from verses 83 to 91. Those prophets mentioned before are said to have received the kitaab, hikmah and nubuwat and must refer to all those mentioned. Th ere is no rationale to limit this description just to one verse . The discussion of all the prophets mentioned is concluded in verse 90.
@@yusufamod6045 Is Eesa and the others mentioned as 'nabiyoon'? I'll have to look at it in greater detail brother. I'll downgrade the strength of my proposition in the next update though. As you've noticed, there is 'a' reference that needs further deliberation
Salaamun Alaykum I suspect that you may delete this comment, but don’t worry: I have made a copy of the screenshot and there are many witnesses who would speak out against you. As a self-proclaimed academic, I expect you to know what “plagiarism” means. It means that you use someone else’s work, proclaiming that work to be yours, without giving them credit. Anyone who watches the Marvelous Quran channel would easily know that 80% of your terms and definitions are plagiarized from the Marvelous Quran channel and website. But it was disappointing to hear you say, repeatedly, that you have not heard anyone do the same research you do! You know that is not true, because I have it in an email from you, personally, that you watch every single Marvelous Quran video segment. Now, about the methodology you claim to follow: You make it appear as if you follow a robust, disciplined methodology (something that we taught again and again on the Marvelous Quran TH-cam channel and on our website). But in truth, your work is shoddy and negligent at best. Here are some examples: 1. You claimed that “ذُكران” (Zukraan) means those who give advice. And yet you never provided any evidence to your claim. 2. You claimed that the Quran does not talk about homosexuality. You should have said: “In the story of Lot, the Quran is not talking about homosexuality”. The truth is: The Quran talks about homosexuality but in other places. 3. You claimed that the root for “الغابرين” (Ghaabireen) is only used for Lot’s ‘woman’. That is not true! A simple root search would have saved you that embarrassment. There are many other examples I can provide… But this is not a full critique In your rush to put out TH-cam videos, you are abusing the methodology and you are misleading your audience. Your conclusions about the story of Lot are provably wrong! We will provide the Quranic story of Lot in a future series after we have had a chance to build the necessary knowledge to understand it. The truth is: You made some really bad assumptions, and overlooked some key questions, such as: Why is Lot referred to sometimes as “Lootan”, sometimes as “Lootin”, and others as “Loota”? Why did you assume that there was only one “Loot”? Had you been as studious as you claim to be, you should have known that “ādam”, for example, is used in the Quran to refer to different people in different places! You did not consider that possibility, did you? You also claimed (without evidence) that Lot did not know about his wife’s “violations of trust”. That again is not true. There is clear evidence against what you said. We will show that when the time comes on the Marvelous Quran channel Insha Allahh. Perhaps, if you stop trying so hard to acquire followers for your TH-cam channel, you would take more time to do better research, AND TO VALIDATE YOUR ASSUMPTIONS AND PRESUPPOSITIONS. I know very well, FROM TALKING AND COMMUNICATING WITH YOU SEVERAL TIMES, that you are capable of doing better than what I have seen on your channel so far. How do I know that your desperation for gaining TH-cam followers (and that this is your real goal)? Anyone can easily see that, in the description box below every one of your videos, you stuff dozens and dozens of unrelated keywords and hashtags, hoping to trick the TH-cam algorithm into showing your videos on people’s TH-cam feed. The description box for your videos do not include a single word about the video itself!!! Please note that this practice is frowned upon by TH-cam (refer to the community guidelines), and is considered a form of cheating! I suspect you know that! I also suspect that TH-cam will be admonishing you or may even block your videos soon, unless you stop this type of underhanded practice. There is a lot more I can say, but I want to leave you with one sincere advice, which I give to the Marvelous Quran audience all the time: Don’t be in a hurry to be a teacher, at the risk of misguiding people, for, if you are messing up the interpretation of the words of Allahh, you would be among “المجرمون” (Al-Mujrimoon), whose eventual conclusion is “الجحيم” (Al-Jaheem). If your true intention is to please Allahh, you would consider this comment a friendly reminder, and you would amend your ways and strategy!
SA dear brother Hany , i dont know why you are hostile against brother Musa: As you said, knowledge comes from Allah and His Guidance, so it's not "your" work or his; if you understand what I mean. Additionally, Brother Musa doesn't ask for money or anything from his works. In fact, there are no ads in his videos. Perhaps he wants to reach a much larger audience to awaken them and bring the light of Allah into these dark days. Like you, Brother Musa doesn't seek blind followers. He presents his works and findings for all of us to check, recheck, and investigate for honesty. If you find any errors or flaws, why not share your understanding, so that the listeners and watchers of this channel can see it too , after all we are all humans, and thus not flawless (controlling the whispers of evil, as you know, is not an easy task). Honestly, I am glad that this channel exists. I am also grateful for the existence of your channel (Marvelous Quran). We need more eye-opening information like this. For 1400 years, we have been kept in the dark. Let phase 3 shine! If you have crookedness in your heart, you will not receive the message. However, if you are genuine in your quest, Allah will grant you the truth, regardless of the source it comes from. Salaamun Alaykum
Salamun Alaikum: I really appreciate Dr. Hany's work and commitment however Dr. Hany needs some serious reflection and self-correction. We are all human beings and bound to make mistakes. Most of the accusations done by Dr. Hany here look like projections, he has been guilty of these himself in many ways. Why is Dr. Hany so focused on "MY" work, "MY" disclosures, "MY" copyrights, "MY" credit and "MY" followers. He deletes comments and posts that are critical of his behavior (which is going downhill), his work or even simply pointing out a possible mistake. He has made 2 negative and inappropriate posts about Al Moses on his own forum without directly naming him, because he doesn't want all of "his" followers to know about Al Moses. He dishes out judgement and labels on anyone who tries to think for themselves or asks sincere questions - he labels Al Moses as "bani israel" and "devious umayyad" on his forum and raises serious warnings because Al-Moses doesn't show his name/face. Dr. Hany should understand that having copyrights/credit/recognition in this world is not important to some people. He "punished" me because I shared a Quran Study tool/website - QuranMorphology - on his forum. He knows the significance of the tool and has praised it on a private zoom call especially the "repeated phrases" feature across Quran; he offered me to become his one-on-one student with the condition that I shut down open/free access to the website and not tell anyone about it because it could be "dangerous". I wanted Dr. Hany as a mentor but that condition along with his recent behavior wasn't right so I did not comply and we did not enter into an agreement and mentorship. I also posted a few questions and some apparent gaps in his teachings which didn't go well with his blind-followers (and probably him). A month later, when I shared the markings/repeated phrases from the tool on the forum (responding to a question), he deleted the posts, blocked me and sent me an email with inappropriate labels - those labels also seem like projections. Of course - I have also been labeled as a "devious umayyad" on his forum, all because Dr. Hany doesn't think "others" should have "free and open access" to tools that can help and expedite Quran study. We appreciate Dr. Hany, Al-Moses and others (named or anonymous) who are striving and trying to help based on their understanding BUT we are grateful to Allah alone. We cannot be a cult, and we cannot think that these individuals are "perfect" or "without the pitfalls of ego". May Allah cleanse us all of our egos and weaknesses, and may we realize that we are all Abd of Allah and striving towards Him.
@@qurandev I understand your critques and appreciate it, but you have to ask what is the best way to drive this 3ilm forward. And to be honest Dr. Hany's disciplined approach to providing the most verified evidence based arguments for his interpretations is the best. This approach requires patience and also telling others not to abuse it. Dr. Hany took the time to write his comment and he dropped some MAJOR hints as to the interpretation of the story of Lut, however, the people replying to his comment are completely ignoring it and maintain that Al-Moses has given us a great interpretation. No, it appears to be a rushed interpretation that does not give the whole story. Why post a TH-cam video about the story of Lut as if this interpreation is a conclusion, should have gotten it peer-reviewed first and also verified the work more diligently. It is safer that way. P.S. I also want to say that I use Quran Morpology and appreciate it that it is free. I also want to say that these sort of discussions should always be focused on the toiling done never on the person/personialities involved. This 3ilm is verifiefable and falsifiable therefore we can maintain obejctive gaze. True, this path is a slow one requiring diligence but it is worth it because the truth awaits the patient ones.
@@gulfamdhillon1513 The methodology is not the issue, however it may naturally need tweaks. The issue is human weakness (ego), mistakes in applying the methodology (sometimes the teacher can make mistakes too) and blind cheerleader behavior that Dr. Hany is cultivating around himself. It has been painful for me to watch this unfold because undoubtedly Dr. Hany has put his heart and soul into the mission. My critique is not geared towards the story of Lut at all, Al-Moses may have made mistakes and that's fine as long as he is open to guidance from Allah and peers. How can one focus on the actual content/correction when Dr. Hany's comment starts with and is full of pettiness and insults and that is a sad state of affairs. He is becoming a threat to his own mission. Who would one go to for peer review, when apparently the teacher's ego and jealousy is coming in the way. I have no idea about, and Al-Moses has not said a word about what has happened between him and Dr Hany, but we know Dr. Hany's inappropriate labeling under the fear-mongering umbrella on his forum - and I know first hand, how Dr. Hany treated me because of his insecurities. I have always politely emailed him any questions and issues/aajila I saw in his work - which dint go well. I would have had no issues even releasing QuranMorphology under MQ umbrella because I dint put my name/face on it to begin with but Dr. Hany mistakenly thinks that MQ is HIM and only he should bring things forward and no one else should have access to tools. His followers are doing a disservice to MQ and him, to let this behavior fester. QuranMorphology will stay open and free InshAllah, it is not "my" website and I claim no credit, it is built with the skills, time and inspiration Allah has provided. It doesn't offer any interpretation, that's between the students and Allah. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or feature requests!
If scholars of past 1200 years did not understand what you understood is in itself sufficient to reject your thesis. And why 1200 years, why not 1400 years?
Mosas is just a fitna nothing else, whoever will try to learn Deen from him will be gumrah for sure, Allah Subhanau Wa Ta'la very straight forward about His Deen from whom you'll learn, look فَسْـَٔلُوٓا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ, he's a gustakh while thinking him among Ehle Zikr will be zülm.
[Qur’an 9:31] They have set up their religious leaders and scholars as lords, instead of GOD. Others deified the Messiah, son of Mary. They were all commanded to worship only one god. There is no god except He. Be He glorified, high above having any partners.
@@AlMosesPhD Lut I'm fact was a messenger who received messages to pass his people.. Why you say Otherwiae.. If he was not prophetic messenger then what he was? Just a person who receive messages from Allah? Oh come on.. Just don't overcook it..
I think u urself is confuse Mosa n taking the things very academically, though quran cannot be just about knowledge, it is about application too n if it will be to difficult that one have to serve a lifetime just to understand the arbic dictionary than the point of applications will disappear. Ovsly the traditional stories are not accurate fully but ur version is totally disgusting. It looks lyk allah never talk about any good and evils. I m also listening to mr hany something he is doing the same thing and after listening few videos i was ok but what are the lessons from these things?? And the answer was: Nothing . The traditionals are actually giving some lessons n way of living which makes the things simple to live . Life is not all about reading and doing research. It is also about living correctly by observing.
SA, great work but I lost you due to the complexity and inconsistency of the structures in some cases. If you could point out the mistakes of the traditional story and then translate according to the Devine lexicon and then point out the propositions, it would be much more coherent. SA
Make sense when all mumins were gone it doesn't make sense one muslin house was left. But it makes sense not even house of Muslims were left. Translations have twisted the word as Allah describes it in quran. Keep it up
You took amrathahu to something totally crazy.. In fact it was Lut's wife.. Everyone just read 66:10-12 and understand what amra means.. Just read above verses and you will know and no need anymore explanation that Almoses here wrong..
I do appreciate. You make sense and you spotted great verses and I also do not go in line with Al Moses and something is fishy . I still accept Lut is prophet and Messenger and it makes literal sense
@@AlMosesPhD you stop fitna, youre not a ehle zikr to learn deen from you, fitna is dangerous than killing. i am not a newbie here, i know all the propagandas root is jewish and azazil. dont try to brain wash me.
They've lied so much that in reality of quran...YOU ARE THE KAFFIR!!ALLAH SAYS IT.BUT YOU THINK YOU KNOW BETTER. WHAT FOLD OF ISLAM THAT ALLAH MENTIONS?
My question is .. does quran recognises a Nabi called Muhammad ? Has Allah addressed him in HIS kalam ? Hw A nabi Muhammad of history is different from quranic Muhammad rasul Allah hatm nabiyin He and his story isnot part of 1400 old man written History ? Why u not clear the audience Al moses sir ! Infact There are 2 parallel religions going on with mixed up terms
Next you will surely say LGBTq is fine. You are dragging quran to your own frame. It won't work like that because many people will be in Janna so just don't be biased to your thoughts
@@AlMosesPhD I respect you but Your interpretation is not in accordance with what the scholars said from the beginning of Islam. They all couldn't be idiots.
![เปิดคำทำนาย นอสตราดามุส - บาบา วานก้า ปี 2025 คนทั่วโลกต้องเจออะไรบ้าง? | แฉ 11 ธ.ค. 67 [2/3] |GMM25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/xmTIKWJUMPM/mqdefault.jpg)
Alhamdullillah. Waooo! Interesting to hear from your perspective. Your way of looking other side of the coin is amazing while everyone is looking only one side for a coin for 1400 year. Great presentation. Keep on good work and May Allah reward you. ❤️it
Assalamualaikum..Like your informative video very much..keep up the good work
Thank you ALLAH for leading me to this brother,as I read the Quran I questioned too many times and I asked ALLAH for an explanation and I found your video,so I sat and listened and so far I love how you explained,Alhamdulillah.. Jazak ALLAH Khairan brother
The best thing about your lecture is that you highlight important points which really helpful for those who want to do research on the particular topic of QURAN. Thanks 🙏 😊 .
Please make your presentation s available in print .It 'll be a great service to knowledge seekrs.
Thought provoking, gives me inspiration to make a story on it.
Salamun alaikum brother Al Moses. Thank you very much indeed for this great work. May God (Allah) bless you and your good intention in helping us understand our only source of divinely evidence-based knowledge, the Quran.
😮wow..very curious about this story
Salamun
Wow what an eye opener!
میں انتظار کر رہا ہوں کہ آپ کب اسے اردو میں ٹرانسلیٹ کریں گے
Savaal :-
Sheikh , Yaha Surah 62/09 , Ki is Tafseer Vaazeh kijiye Jisme Juma k din Namaz padhne ka Huqm diya gaya he.
يَأَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ امَنُوا إِذَا نُودِيَ لِلصَّلوة مِنْ يَوْمِ الْجُمُعَةِ فَاسْعَوْا إِلَى ذِكْرِ اللَّهِ وَذَرُوا الْبَيْعَ ذَلِكُمْ خَيْرٌ لَكُمْ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ تَعْلَمُونَ
'Jumah' wali vid dekahin
@@AlMosesPhD ji, thike
Have you shared these files online?
A good way to understand what is going on with the Story of Lut is just look at Russia and Ukraine conflict. When you understand the parallels between these 2 things then everything starts to make sense and definitions of words start to unravel themselves.
Furthermore you start to understand who Ibrahim really was and how he fits into History. What is the significance of the era of Ibrahim and its connection to Musa & Eisa, etc
Im glad you are opening up to the significance of the Chronology of Revelation over Cannonical arrangement of the Mushaf.
There is an order that the Quran is meant to be read in, the distorted arrangement is what creates all the confusion.
Chronology of events as they exist in Quran for specific events, brother.
Not the alleged revelation order of the Quran.
They are two different things:)
@@AlMosesPhD You've taken the first step towards a greater destination that you may not have set out to embark on. You'll start to realise that when you read these stories in Chronology of events that the Surahs start to align in order of Revelation. You are more likely to notice something that your are looking for than not or another way of saying this would be if you aren't looking for the Chronology of Revelation then you are less likely to notice it.
You are on your own journey so I'll respectfully allow you to come to that realisation on your own.
I apologise for trying to rush you.
@@darth_veda Do Muslims even have the complete order of revelation for each verse of Quran?
@@reflectingrye4823 Quran wasn't revealed verse at a time it was revealed in entire Surahs. Otherwise how can the "Create 1 or 10 surah like it" be possible? Ashab ul Nazul is a fabrication to force certain meanings upon the verses of the Quran.
Musa bhai urdu me Kab convert karoge is luth series ko
Which AI website have you used for images?
Great work
Very interesting and waiting for the next video anxiously as the thirst has been developed
❤❤
I am attentively listening and learning. Thank you for sharing.
Brother moses thanks for the work your doing ❤❤❤
Plz elaborate surah Namal (27:55) thank you so much plz
Plz brother explain
Assalam u Alaikum, I would like to ask about the rule set by Allah swt himself in Quran
القرآن - سورۃ نمبر 4 النساء
آیت نمبر 82
أَعُوذُ بِاللَّهِ مِنَ الشَّيْطَانِ الرَّجِيمِ
بِسْمِ اللّٰهِ الرَّحْمٰنِ الرَّحِيْمِ
اَفَلَا يَتَدَبَّرُوۡنَ الۡقُرۡاٰنَؕ وَلَوۡ كَانَ مِنۡ عِنۡدِ غَيۡرِ اللّٰهِ لَوَجَدُوۡا فِيۡهِ اخۡتِلَافًا كَثِيۡرًا ۞
As you mentioned about any specific terms used in Quran should be taken according to the context going on like you said for قوم here.
I am Confused. Please respond.
SA, sorry, what's the question?
Walekum Salam sir thanx for easily I downloaded it and listening partially two or three days ....
Salam brother, Are your sources also Herbrew and Aramaic word roots?
Salam, absolutely not, because that would be the wrong approach
@@AlMosesPhD thank you
in my opinion PowerPoint Presentation much better option than this one" back and forth ", i am still having hard time to understand because of that.
Sound is very low on the mobile.
Problem with your phone brother
1) Words selaamEN سَلَامًا and selaamUN سَلَامٌ in 51:25 are full sentences. We should ask: what kind of sentences, and is there any subject? Word selaam cannot be a greeting, cause of 25:75.
2) I couldn't find 'awaalim in the Qur'an, but on the same weight we have fewaakih, which is a plural of faakihet. So, 'awaalim should be a plural of 'aalimet (feminine active participle, also not used in the Qur'an) rather then of 'aalem.
The traditional understanding is that Salaman has a hidden verb, like nusalli salaman.
But yes, you've hit on a point that does need more consideration
@@AlMosesPhD I think, and I'm quite sure, that selaamEN is a question and selaamUN its answer. I also think that this word expresses freedom given by "the other side", in a sense that their is no objection, hostility or anything that could prevent somebody to do something. So, this would be "Free? Free.", as a question are those guests free to enter with a positive answer.
I was speaking with some elders in my people and heard that "selaam" was never used before on the street as a greeting, but "merhaba", and selaam people used when entering somebody's house or other objects.
And, for 'aalemoon, I see that its meaning is "students" in a sense that they're people who're studying something in different ways, for example empirical and rational, in real life, dream, pondering, waHy, etc., and they're studying many or all life topics. On the other hand, one of the meaning of Rabb can be Teacher, which is a common meaning of Hebrew "ravi". So, Rabb-ul-'aalemeen could be The Teacher of the students.
@@aladindelic Interesting
Traditional understanding put the word سَلَماً in QS 39:29 as an adjective carrying the meaning solely/uniquely
@@ujangsekeluarga5443 selemen and selaamen are different words
Can you make a video drawing out just your conclusions? I'd prefer to watch that first and then watch this technical explanation.
It is often easier to start out with your conclusion like with scientific articles, so that the viewer can have an idea of where the technical explanation is going which would actually assist with understanding.
Maybe when I finish the series. When that might be though, I don't know
Have you watch the channel Marvelous Quran?
Dont make conclusion first for your video. I know for a fact it will always be the wrong way.
Assalamu alaikum! In Surah Al-An'am 6:83-90, where 18 prophets are mentioned by their names, and Lut (AS) is also mentioned by name. So, what would you say?
SA,
To me, the 'those are those given nubuwa' seems to refer to the generic target in the ayah before, and not the whole group that came before. There is a pattern in the earlier ayat where people are named and then summarized as the primary group they belong to, and then the listing process continues with more people and their grouping.
As in Zakaria, Ilyas. Yahya, Isa are from saliheen. Then a new group and so forth
But, I will downgrade the strength of my proposition in the next update, and continue to look at that section in detail.
Salamu Alaykum
Of the 18 named, how many were given scriptures? The only ones given scriptures were Moses and Jesus. Jonah wasn't given Scripture, and neither was Elisha or Yahya. Why do you think they all were given prophethood? It doesn't say they all were given prophethood. It says they were given "Scripture, wisdom and prophethood", it doesn't say which were given what.
[6:89] Those are the ones to whom We gave the Scripture, wisdom, and prophethood. Even if these people now disbelieve in them, We have entrusted them to others who do not disbelieve.
Salam
great research n ponder brother, by sharing your personal method to do ur own research, so it may inspire other for how they do their own research too, great research n sharing brother ❤❤❤
I very much appreciate and thank your incredible and priceless efforts. Eagerly waiting for next videos.
It would be better if you provide notes in pdf form and also include urdu along english in colums
Salamun Alaikum wa Rahmatullah. A few initial thoughts having watched the whole way through.
Truly grateful for this presentation and the efforts you have gone to, to keep it clear and to the point. It was easy to follow along and even on a mobile it was easy to zoom on the screen ( your zooming helped as well, thank you!)
The methodology and charts are amazing, including how you went through the ayaat and marked the (many!) questions, and it shows the diligence you have maintained and the reverence for Kitaab Allah. Mashallah walhumdulillah. Keen to learn more about the way you came to conclusions about the order of the story.
Well worth the time following along for anyone with an open mind.
Will definitely need to watch again a few times I think inshallah with the Qur'an open to go back and forth between the surahs to get a more solid understanding of the order of events, the terminology, your shared insights, and the questions raised and more.
From a lay perspective, genuinely surprised this level of analysis is not the norm, inshallah this and MQ approach is changing this for the better for this generation.
Question: the way you have presented the ayaat in order of events; am I right in understanding this is what you consider to be adhering to "wa rattililQuraana tarteela"?
Finally, I'm reminded of Ibrahim (as) dua: Rabbana wab'ath feehim, rasoolan minhum, yatloo alayhim ayaatika, wa yuallimuhu al Kitaaba walHikmata, wa yuzakkeehim, innaka anta alAzeez alHakeem.
Salamun Alaikum
Re the order, there is no magic but a lot of squinting at the chart to ensure all 15 surahs flow together
Shahwah meaning???
Salaamun bro musa.
??? Off topic Q.
Surah 2/2. Zaalikal kitab not hazal kitab. That book not this book
??is there other meaning of zaalika? Appear similar to kazalik.
Sukran.
SA, zalika = that
Al-Kitab is NOT Al-Quran
@@AlMosesPhD i really need your opinion/advance ilm.
Say kitab is the taurat as per ahli kitab = ahli taurat. Probably surah 2/2 begins with addressing believer of taurat.
How do we reconcile with surah 2/285, kutubihi?? Taurat and its continuation which is the quran??
Surah 2 begins with definition of muttaqin (them) and ends with definition of mukminun (us).
It leads to anotherQ?? If it refers to taurat why it uses unnzila = gradual dissemination?? Why not nazala = one time delivery of complete book??
Sukran bro.
@@tiaratiarasam1886 it is not the taurat.
I'll cover it in English one day
sir word" Imrat" also used in surah "Lahab" there it is also translated as Abu lahabs Wife what is your opnion about it
As I said, I'll cover it one day brother
some questions while i listen: is there an ahl muhammad mentioned in the reading? i remember the verse "my lord, my people took this quran as a thing abandoned". is the verse suggesting muhammad was completely rejected by his community, a rejection worse than lut? and was muhammad's community completely annihilated?
right now my country is going through the presidential elections and i like to share my thoughts. can ahl be seen as those followers who're basically from the lower classes, who go about putting up the party flags, banners and posters. people who perform simple yet necessary tasks. and ahl, they hold higher positions of the parties. people who're skilled with oratory, well versed in governing and law and people from societies aristocracy?
No Ahl Muhammad in the Quran
Beyt: Religion, doctrine, social system and not a high building. Good point 😊
salaamun brother. u might know all of the following already but ... reminder is always beneficial for the mominoon ;-)
1. highly appreciate ur PhD humbleness in front of the quran towards the end of the vdo. its the key. please try to never lose sight of this. allah has chosen u for a massive task. agreed. just always keep the focus away from the words 'chosen' and 'you'... and keep the entire focus on the key phrase ' allah has'... and inshallah u will keep churning out intellectual gems and 'brain grenades' like this and most of ur quran work, to keep exploding in our heads for a long time to come. and repeatedly keep bringing us to our knees in front of the quran.
2. please never evaluate the quality/value/impact of ur work by the optics of the channel and the views etc... the mass neuron short circuiting u r carrying out for the quran, from the quran, is priceless and timeless. possibly because of its basis being entirely quranic. this stuff is opening up the quran like an escher print being turned into a 3d space or something way epicer !... mind bending and gorgeous at the same time.
whatever u do, don't stop this work, even if there is 1 view. views don't equal baraka, sincerity sure does equal baraka, and u got a truckload of that coming out ur vazuza... ;-)
thanks for catalyzing my quran journey and all prayers for baraka overload in ur journey inshalah..cheers.
Thanks brother
Thank u
Great!
Just beautiful reality. We are hopeful to get back the hidden truth
Walykom muslam mosa brother please make a video "Who is Allah"
2nd where we go after death,
Confusing.
Dont know what to blooming believe!
Brother Moses. Salamun alikum. God bless you and through people like you, let Allah convey his message to people. Shaitaan has played his role enough and he will continue doing so, but with our tadabbur approach, and by using aqqal, we can find out the real message and follow the instructions of Allah (alone). Glad to see this kind of videos, very informative and with very nice presenation. Thanks a lot. Keep going...
Great work, brother. I am making notes from this lecture because the words you discussed and their meanings are very important to ponder. because our traditional scholars have slaughtered it 😢.
Can u pls share the notes with me ? @unlearning_is_chalange
@suhanamullick9857 I do not make any special notes. I rewrite the plan for my own understanding. If you need notes, just listen and write what is important to remember and ponder or to reverify using dictionaries for your own satisfaction. I listen but follow only what my understanding can catch up on. That is my note! Thanks for reaching out to me.
Share some research on meanings of huroof e muqattat
I know that you are on rightpath carry on the goodness.
Moses kindly make a video about Ramadan in Quran.
سلام علیک موسی بھائی۔ اردو زبان میں کب شاۓ کریں گے
Thanks, it will take time to digest this information. Can you please share your documents if possible?
Maybe after a few vids into the series
Zabardast wizahit Dr Mosa kindly speech in urdue
Aoa to all❤
Somehow i am even more confused. What're you even saying??
Can you explain in urdu plz
Please make more videos on Nisa.
If you speak Urdu, watch the 'Quran aur Aurat' series
Salamun bro.
I am inclined to say that lut is a descriptor for another rasul.
Salam, who and why?
@@AlMosesPhD i could not name who because i could not reconcile why lut is contemporary of ibrahim.
But there sre prevalent themes in the quran, such as mindun nillah = no intermediary. Such as the quran from Allah hence its interpretation MUST use Allah vocabulary. I opine homosexuality might refer to Allah choices of using gender of words at his own fancy = not as per arabic grammar.
Another prevalent theme is its uses descriptor to protect sanctity of instruction relays to the nabi/rasul.
Lut was listed with ismail, ilyasa and yunus. By accident?? Nope!! Allah lines them up with intention.
Then there are 4 salamuns to 4 nabi/ rasul. Nuuhin fil aalamin ibrahim, musa & harun and ilyaasin.
ilyaasin?? Look like a descriptor, right??
This is my understanding. Sukran.
@@tiaratiarasam1886 interesting.
Pl enlighten us on Hajj as Surah Hajj starts with Alnnas ,not Muslims. Hope you comprehend what I try to learn. Then Aba ابا and ابو . Both with the same meaning.... Father? Zaka not what Mullas teach us? Yanfiqun ینفقون ...for distribution if in access of wealth? Looking forward to hearing from you pl. Regards
You can watch the 'hajj' vid
Make this video in urdu as well
salaams. In sura 6 verses 83 to 89, the quran lists the prophets which include Lut. In verse 89 it says referring to all the prophets mentioned before as those to whom was given nubuwat which includes Lut
Very good point.
I'll think it over. To me, it seems to refer to the ayah before, echoing the pattern in the earlier ayat where people are named and then summarized as the group they belong to before the list continues.
As in Zakaria, Ilyas. Yahya, Isa are from saliheen. Then a new group and so forth
89 then refers to whoever is explicitly selected in ayah 88
Salaams. With due respect, we see that the Qur'an discussion is continuous from verses 83 to 91. Those prophets mentioned before are said to have received the kitaab, hikmah and nubuwat and must refer to all those mentioned. Th ere is no rationale to limit this description just to one verse . The discussion of all the prophets mentioned is concluded in verse 90.
@@yusufamod6045 Is Eesa and the others mentioned as 'nabiyoon'? I'll have to look at it in greater detail brother.
I'll downgrade the strength of my proposition in the next update though. As you've noticed, there is 'a' reference that needs further deliberation
Aslkm plz hindi ya urdu mai bolo
Salaamun Alaykum
I suspect that you may delete this comment, but don’t worry: I have made a copy of the screenshot and there are many witnesses who would speak out against you.
As a self-proclaimed academic, I expect you to know what “plagiarism” means. It means that you use someone else’s work, proclaiming that work to be yours, without giving them credit.
Anyone who watches the Marvelous Quran channel would easily know that 80% of your terms and definitions are plagiarized from the Marvelous Quran channel and website.
But it was disappointing to hear you say, repeatedly, that you have not heard anyone do the same research you do! You know that is not true, because I have it in an email from you, personally, that you watch every single Marvelous Quran video segment.
Now, about the methodology you claim to follow: You make it appear as if you follow a robust, disciplined methodology (something that we taught again and again on the Marvelous Quran TH-cam channel and on our website).
But in truth, your work is shoddy and negligent at best. Here are some examples:
1. You claimed that “ذُكران” (Zukraan) means those who give advice. And yet you never provided any evidence to your claim.
2. You claimed that the Quran does not talk about homosexuality. You should have said: “In the story of Lot, the Quran is not talking about homosexuality”. The truth is: The Quran talks about homosexuality but in other places.
3. You claimed that the root for “الغابرين” (Ghaabireen) is only used for Lot’s ‘woman’. That is not true! A simple root search would have saved you that embarrassment.
There are many other examples I can provide… But this is not a full critique
In your rush to put out TH-cam videos, you are abusing the methodology and you are misleading your audience. Your conclusions about the story of Lot are provably wrong! We will provide the Quranic story of Lot in a future series after we have had a chance to build the necessary knowledge to understand it.
The truth is: You made some really bad assumptions, and overlooked some key questions, such as: Why is Lot referred to sometimes as “Lootan”, sometimes as “Lootin”, and others as “Loota”? Why did you assume that there was only one “Loot”? Had you been as studious as you claim to be, you should have known that “ādam”, for example, is used in the Quran to refer to different people in different places!
You did not consider that possibility, did you?
You also claimed (without evidence) that Lot did not know about his wife’s “violations of trust”. That again is not true. There is clear evidence against what you said. We will show that when the time comes on the Marvelous Quran channel Insha Allahh.
Perhaps, if you stop trying so hard to acquire followers for your TH-cam channel, you would take more time to do better research, AND TO VALIDATE YOUR ASSUMPTIONS AND PRESUPPOSITIONS. I know very well, FROM TALKING AND COMMUNICATING WITH YOU SEVERAL TIMES, that you are capable of doing better than what I have seen on your channel so far.
How do I know that your desperation for gaining TH-cam followers (and that this is your real goal)? Anyone can easily see that, in the description box below every one of your videos, you stuff dozens and dozens of unrelated keywords and hashtags, hoping to trick the TH-cam algorithm into showing your videos on people’s TH-cam feed. The description box for your videos do not include a single word about the video itself!!!
Please note that this practice is frowned upon by TH-cam (refer to the community guidelines), and is considered a form of cheating! I suspect you know that! I also suspect that TH-cam will be admonishing you or may even block your videos soon, unless you stop this type of underhanded practice.
There is a lot more I can say, but I want to leave you with one sincere advice, which I give to the Marvelous Quran audience all the time: Don’t be in a hurry to be a teacher, at the risk of misguiding people, for, if you are messing up the interpretation of the words of Allahh, you would be among “المجرمون” (Al-Mujrimoon), whose eventual conclusion is “الجحيم” (Al-Jaheem). If your true intention is to please Allahh, you would consider this comment a friendly reminder, and you would amend your ways and strategy!
SA dear brother Hany , i dont know why you are hostile against brother Musa:
As you said, knowledge comes from Allah and His Guidance, so it's not "your" work or his; if you understand what I mean. Additionally, Brother Musa doesn't ask for money or anything from his works. In fact, there are no ads in his videos. Perhaps he wants to reach a much larger audience to awaken them and bring the light of Allah into these dark days.
Like you, Brother Musa doesn't seek blind followers. He presents his works and findings for all of us to check, recheck, and investigate for honesty. If you find any errors or flaws, why not share your understanding, so that the listeners and watchers of this channel can see it too , after all we are all humans, and thus not flawless (controlling the whispers of evil, as you know, is not an easy task).
Honestly, I am glad that this channel exists. I am also grateful for the existence of your channel (Marvelous Quran). We need more eye-opening information like this. For 1400 years, we have been kept in the dark. Let phase 3 shine!
If you have crookedness in your heart, you will not receive the message. However, if you are genuine in your quest, Allah will grant you the truth, regardless of the source it comes from.
Salaamun Alaykum
Salamun Alaikum: I really appreciate Dr. Hany's work and commitment however Dr. Hany needs some serious reflection and self-correction. We are all human beings and bound to make mistakes. Most of the accusations done by Dr. Hany here look like projections, he has been guilty of these himself in many ways. Why is Dr. Hany so focused on "MY" work, "MY" disclosures, "MY" copyrights, "MY" credit and "MY" followers. He deletes comments and posts that are critical of his behavior (which is going downhill), his work or even simply pointing out a possible mistake. He has made 2 negative and inappropriate posts about Al Moses on his own forum without directly naming him, because he doesn't want all of "his" followers to know about Al Moses. He dishes out judgement and labels on anyone who tries to think for themselves or asks sincere questions - he labels Al Moses as "bani israel" and "devious umayyad" on his forum and raises serious warnings because Al-Moses doesn't show his name/face. Dr. Hany should understand that having copyrights/credit/recognition in this world is not important to some people. He "punished" me because I shared a Quran Study tool/website - QuranMorphology - on his forum. He knows the significance of the tool and has praised it on a private zoom call especially the "repeated phrases" feature across Quran; he offered me to become his one-on-one student with the condition that I shut down open/free access to the website and not tell anyone about it because it could be "dangerous". I wanted Dr. Hany as a mentor but that condition along with his recent behavior wasn't right so I did not comply and we did not enter into an agreement and mentorship. I also posted a few questions and some apparent gaps in his teachings which didn't go well with his blind-followers (and probably him). A month later, when I shared the markings/repeated phrases from the tool on the forum (responding to a question), he deleted the posts, blocked me and sent me an email with inappropriate labels - those labels also seem like projections. Of course - I have also been labeled as a "devious umayyad" on his forum, all because Dr. Hany doesn't think "others" should have "free and open access" to tools that can help and expedite Quran study. We appreciate Dr. Hany, Al-Moses and others (named or anonymous) who are striving and trying to help based on their understanding BUT we are grateful to Allah alone. We cannot be a cult, and we cannot think that these individuals are "perfect" or "without the pitfalls of ego". May Allah cleanse us all of our egos and weaknesses, and may we realize that we are all Abd of Allah and striving towards Him.
@@qurandev I understand your critques and appreciate it, but you have to ask what is the best way to drive this 3ilm forward. And to be honest Dr. Hany's disciplined approach to providing the most verified evidence based arguments for his interpretations is the best. This approach requires patience and also telling others not to abuse it. Dr. Hany took the time to write his comment and he dropped some MAJOR hints as to the interpretation of the story of Lut, however, the people replying to his comment are completely ignoring it and maintain that Al-Moses has given us a great interpretation. No, it appears to be a rushed interpretation that does not give the whole story. Why post a TH-cam video about the story of Lut as if this interpreation is a conclusion, should have gotten it peer-reviewed first and also verified the work more diligently. It is safer that way.
P.S. I also want to say that I use Quran Morpology and appreciate it that it is free. I also want to say that these sort of discussions should always be focused on the toiling done never on the person/personialities involved. This 3ilm is verifiefable and falsifiable therefore we can maintain obejctive gaze. True, this path is a slow one requiring diligence but it is worth it because the truth awaits the patient ones.
@@gulfamdhillon1513 The methodology is not the issue, however it may naturally need tweaks. The issue is human weakness (ego), mistakes in applying the methodology (sometimes the teacher can make mistakes too) and blind cheerleader behavior that Dr. Hany is cultivating around himself. It has been painful for me to watch this unfold because undoubtedly Dr. Hany has put his heart and soul into the mission. My critique is not geared towards the story of Lut at all, Al-Moses may have made mistakes and that's fine as long as he is open to guidance from Allah and peers. How can one focus on the actual content/correction when Dr. Hany's comment starts with and is full of pettiness and insults and that is a sad state of affairs. He is becoming a threat to his own mission. Who would one go to for peer review, when apparently the teacher's ego and jealousy is coming in the way. I have no idea about, and Al-Moses has not said a word about what has happened between him and Dr Hany, but we know Dr. Hany's inappropriate labeling under the fear-mongering umbrella on his forum - and I know first hand, how Dr. Hany treated me because of his insecurities. I have always politely emailed him any questions and issues/aajila I saw in his work - which dint go well. I would have had no issues even releasing QuranMorphology under MQ umbrella because I dint put my name/face on it to begin with but Dr. Hany mistakenly thinks that MQ is HIM and only he should bring things forward and no one else should have access to tools. His followers are doing a disservice to MQ and him, to let this behavior fester. QuranMorphology will stay open and free InshAllah, it is not "my" website and I claim no credit, it is built with the skills, time and inspiration Allah has provided. It doesn't offer any interpretation, that's between the students and Allah. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or feature requests!
th-cam.com/video/y_BpFzMJgX0/w-d-xo.html
Are you seriously defending this clowns 😂😂😂
If scholars of past 1200 years did not understand what you understood is in itself sufficient to reject your thesis. And why 1200 years, why not 1400 years?
Did 'you' consider the Quranic evidence?
You're responsible for yourself, not those before you.
Obsessed to insult Islam and worship homos! May Almighty keep our generations protected from fitnah such as this channel
Mosas is just a fitna nothing else, whoever will try to learn Deen from him will be gumrah for sure, Allah Subhanau Wa Ta'la very straight forward about His Deen from whom you'll learn, look فَسْـَٔلُوٓا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ, he's a gustakh while thinking him among Ehle Zikr will be zülm.
[Qur’an 9:31] They have set up their religious leaders and scholars as lords, instead of GOD. Others deified the Messiah, son of Mary. They were all commanded to worship only one god. There is no god except He. Be He glorified, high above having any partners.
Salamunalaikum...
😊
Kindly make your screen readable to us
For this, you'll have to use a desktop browser
Slamun alekum
Musaa bahi please urdu mein bhi karen
What... But in fact a Messenger...37:133
?
@@AlMosesPhD Lut I'm fact was a messenger who received messages to pass his people.. Why you say Otherwiae.. If he was not prophetic messenger then what he was? Just a person who receive messages from Allah? Oh come on.. Just don't overcook it..
please translate your videos in bengali. 30 crores people speak Bangla. so it will be very helpful for Bengalees.
What about the people who lusted over men instead of women?
Next vid
Too much dragging without coming to the point
Quran 6:86-89 proves prophet lot is a prophet.😂
I think u urself is confuse Mosa n taking the things very academically, though quran cannot be just about knowledge, it is about application too n if it will be to difficult that one have to serve a lifetime just to understand the arbic dictionary than the point of applications will disappear. Ovsly the traditional stories are not accurate fully but ur version is totally disgusting. It looks lyk allah never talk about any good and evils. I m also listening to mr hany something he is doing the same thing and after listening few videos i was ok but what are the lessons from these things?? And the answer was: Nothing . The traditionals are actually giving some lessons n way of living which makes the things simple to live . Life is not all about reading and doing research. It is also about living correctly by observing.
Urdu lecture please
SA, great work but I lost you due to the complexity and inconsistency of the structures in some cases. If you could point out the mistakes of the traditional story and then translate according to the Devine lexicon and then point out the propositions, it would be much more coherent. SA
Make sense when all mumins were gone it doesn't make sense one muslin house was left. But it makes sense not even house of Muslims were left. Translations have twisted the word as Allah describes it in quran. Keep it up
Bro Urdu please 😢😢
موسی صاحب میں آپ کی وڈیوز کافی شوق سے دیکھتا ہوں۔ کافی سچائی ہوتی ہے ان میں۔ دوستی ہو سکتی ہے آپ کے ساتھ۔
Live stream mein zarur tashrif layay
You took amrathahu to something totally crazy.. In fact it was Lut's wife.. Everyone just read 66:10-12 and understand what amra means.. Just read above verses and you will know and no need anymore explanation that Almoses here wrong..
I do appreciate. You make sense and you spotted great verses and I also do not go in line with Al Moses and something is fishy . I still accept Lut is prophet and Messenger and it makes literal sense
موسیٰ بھائی اس کو اردو میں بھی بیان کر دینا آپ کی مہربانی ھو گی
Aik din inshallah
Also he's a gustakh e Rasulüllah Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam, for such people this ayet revealed: يٰٓأَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا لَا تَرْفَعُوٓا أَصْوٰتَكُمْ فَوْقَ صَوْتِ النَّبِىِّ وَلَا تَجْهَرُوا لَهُۥ بِالْقَوْلِ كَجَهْرِ بَعْضِكُمْ لِبَعْضٍ أَن تَحْبَطَ أَعْمٰلُكُمْ وَأَنتُمْ لَا تَشْعُرُونَ
Are you listening to the kalam of that Nabi? Or choosing Israelyat?
Also, stop spamming. You don't wish to consider the Quran? Fine. Don't spam
@@AlMosesPhD you stop fitna, youre not a ehle zikr to learn deen from you, fitna is dangerous than killing. i am not a newbie here, i know all the propagandas root is jewish and azazil. dont try to brain wash me.
Plz urdu
*Please explain kafir, halala and murtadd. Why and for what?*
You sound like a LGBTQXYZ muslim!you know nothing!learn that you are not Allah.They lied since the UMMAYAD and abbasids...idiot
They've lied so much that in reality of quran...YOU ARE THE KAFFIR!!ALLAH SAYS IT.BUT YOU THINK YOU KNOW BETTER. WHAT FOLD OF ISLAM THAT ALLAH MENTIONS?
@benam1559 all these are already covered in the channel.
@@AlMosesPhD
What channel?
Is answering that difficult for muslim? Or something else that muslims hide.
@@benam1559 is this a knowledge seeker's attitude?
If you are serious, you'll find your answers here and a million other places.
My question is .. does quran recognises a Nabi called Muhammad ?
Has Allah addressed him in HIS kalam ?
Hw A nabi Muhammad of history is different from quranic
Muhammad rasul Allah hatm nabiyin
He and his story isnot part of 1400 old man written History ?
Why u not clear the audience Al moses sir ! Infact
There are 2 parallel religions going on with mixed up terms
Watch 'Kya main Quranist hoon?'
SA
Looks like qadiyani channel
Did you listen to the Quran?
Next you will surely say LGBTq is fine. You are dragging quran to your own frame. It won't work like that because many people will be in Janna so just don't be biased to your thoughts
Total nonsense. This guy makes Arabic gymnastics. Debate with some great scholar like Javed ghamidi
Do you know enough to make that statement brother?
If not, woudn't hurt to be humble and investigate the Quranic evidence before this attitude
@@AlMosesPhD
I respect you but Your interpretation is not in accordance with what the scholars said from the beginning of Islam. They all couldn't be idiots.
I'm ready to talk to you but unfortunately I'm from India occupied Kashmir.
your commentry is totaly baseless and false.
Sir urdu hindi mai hona chahiye
Assᴀʟᴀᴍᴜ ᴀʟᴀɪᴋᴜᴍ! Nᴇᴇᴅ Sᴀᴍᴇ ᴠɪᴅᴇᴏ ɪɴ ᴜʀᴅᴜ/ʜɪɴᴅɪ ᴘʟᴇᴀsᴇ!??