Inverse Laplace Transform, Sect 7.4#1

Inverse Laplace Transform, Nagle Sect7.4 playlist: • Inverse Laplace Transf...
blackpenredpen

[@anshallu3235]

The way he runs.... He doesnt even wait for 'thank you sir'.

[@spread-peace]

2:08 I laughed at " do not put a +C because this is not integration ".

[@existentialrap521]

Thx gangsta. i love u daddy blackpen

[@fricken.fricks]

3!=6 so can you skip a step? More specially the step where you take 6 out of the inverse Laplace transformation and put 3!/3! in the equation. Just introduce 6=3!

[@FM1234]

I guess it's in order to teach the general solution to these things...

[@6c15adamsconradwilliam3]

Thank you man!!! That’s what I wanted!!

[@christopheramissah3126]

Thank you
You are making the point

[@kodistamana6059]

Thank you

[@S3SIC831]

THANK YOU

[@brianramz6681]

You said you recommend doing it this way ...is there any other way?

[@mallakbasheersyed1859]

Convolution

[@brianramz6681]

@@mallakbasheersyed1859
how he said it i knew there was a way to kill it too..haha thanks

[@mallakbasheersyed1859]

@@brianramz6681 wlcm

[@Vladimir064Mr]

thanks

[@AdilKhan-ww5yw]

Find Laplace inverse of 2s+3/(s+3)^3 and S^2/(s-1)^4

[@existentialrap521]

did you ever find it? xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

[@shiwanigupta1923]

Thank u sir

[@megafightking]

What if it was a 2 instead of a 6, how will it be solved?

[@richardjung21]

Multiplying the constant 1/3 to the final solution would do, if you multiplied 3/3 to the initial problem and only removed 1/3 from the equation

[@Meeroo670]

Magnificent

[@muradbashirov6435]

Actually it is integration, but improper

[@naveensd101]

are you god

[@gregorochieng]

Inverse Laplace of {1/p²(p-5)²}

[@alexismisselyn3916]

=(2/5 + t -2e^5t/5+te^t)/25

[@spread-peace]

First you need to use Partial Fraction and then solve, it would become easy.

[@spread-peace]

Is it helpful?

[@davedonnie6425]

I dont think putting the 6 at the front is more "systematic." Who cares? If it works it works.