A Field In England: The Presence of Absence

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 119

  • @chasidahL
    @chasidahL 4 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    Masterpiece movie. Reece Shearsmith staggering out of the tent, after the blood curdling screams was bone chilling & the image has stayed with me. He is such an amazing actor. Able to portray abject horror & terror with no dialogue. Pure genius. This was an absolutely superb review. Perfect explanation. Can't wait to watch the film again! Thanks for sharing........

    • @BrianCarnevaleB26
      @BrianCarnevaleB26 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      An Excellent summary. Well said, mate!
      Cheers!

    • @PG-wz7by
      @PG-wz7by 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @ChasidaL I am both scarred and delighted by Shearsmith's performance. His character's transformation is unexpected and and tangible. Amazing work.

    • @chasidahL
      @chasidahL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@PG-wz7by- absolutely!

  • @ephemera...
    @ephemera... 5 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    This is the best film analysis I’ve seen on TH-cam. Kudos.

  • @angusfindlay9576
    @angusfindlay9576 6 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    How this channel doesn't have a million more subs I'll never know, great video!

    • @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat
      @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you very much!

    • @RezValla
      @RezValla 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      they're great on rewatch too. i find myself returning to these videos. great channel. def underrated

  • @RyanRSteiner
    @RyanRSteiner 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Superb insights into an amazing piece of work!
    This movie is not everyone's cup of tea, but the layers of depth it offers are rewarding to discover, once you stop taking it at literal, face value. It was a movie that was, at times, somehow just indescribably... unsettling yet for me - which I found surprising, considering how unflinchingly jaded I typically am (from already seeing so much in movies and other media). Putting together why/how it causes this response has been interesting to try to put together. I had noticed some of the things you pointed out here, but the rope and the fairy ring thing is a new piece of the puzzle for me. Thanks for sharing!

  • @ArthurMorgan-_-
    @ArthurMorgan-_- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The visuals in this movie are phenomenal. Very realistic to an actual psilocybin trip

  • @graveyardgxblin
    @graveyardgxblin 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The motionless tableau scene really hit me. Very stark & out of the blue.

  • @selimacast725
    @selimacast725 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This movie has one of the most underrated soundtracks ever I think

  • @Pyro-Moloch
    @Pyro-Moloch 6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I love your choices of the films you pick for the videos

  • @sunnygreenings4840
    @sunnygreenings4840 ปีที่แล้ว

    "The presence of absence" is the perfect description. While the space used by the director seems prescribed to catch the remains of the adventure, I wondered throughout when the hedgerow would again be transgressed.
    I suppose I locked into that hedge as the main limn, where chaos by a turn becomes a green world of sorts. But as in all green worlds (the Bard as my guide) anything green and good and true seldom occurs. The green world is really a world of alchemy *and* black holes. It's more chaotic.
    Great analysis which informed my watching a few years ago.

  • @eon14873
    @eon14873 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Super review. I love this film. The tones, the music, acting, psychedelia and what you touched on about the lack of ambient sounds like the obvious strong wind. Genius

  • @nusee7267
    @nusee7267 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow! Thank you so much for this beautiful essay. I've loved this film for so long without being able to articulate what mind-bogglingly funs & exciting it is to watch.

  • @quitescripted1908
    @quitescripted1908 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The assortment of topics you have dealt with up until now is astonishing! It is so exciting and rare to see tastes of such a prolific content creator aligning with your own! Thank you so much for your incredible work!

  • @theviper1999uk
    @theviper1999uk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What an excellent video. Perfect analysis, you opened my eyes to so many of the things the film is doing. Thank you for making this !

  • @graveyardgxblin
    @graveyardgxblin 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Even watching scenes from this film in your video is giving me goosebumps.

  • @cirquedude123
    @cirquedude123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This film blew me away... and then you explain to me why I was so blown away! Wow incredible!

  • @morehush
    @morehush 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    GRACE! Thank you for doing this. Especially with Wheatley's films, you give me a greater understanding and appreciation for things I already love.

  • @holdencaulfield4808
    @holdencaulfield4808 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man. What a great flick. I love when I watch a film that I know pretty much nothing about beforehand and it turns out to be brilliant.

  • @TooFatTooFurious
    @TooFatTooFurious 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Holy shit, lady, your content is incredible. You do these cool animatics and title cards, and your editing is spot on. You should have way more subscribers.

  • @lucasgoncalves2414
    @lucasgoncalves2414 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Another beautiful analysis. Thanks again! You became already one of my favourites video essayists. Your stuff is very relevant and entertaining. :)

    • @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat
      @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you very much!

    • @lucasgoncalves2414
      @lucasgoncalves2414 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know you must be sick of this requests but I'd love to see your take on Darren Aronofsky's Requiem for a Dream, or maybe Pi...

    • @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat
      @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I love Pi! It's on my list of possible video subjects but no actually plans yet.

  • @josephwalls8917
    @josephwalls8917 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great video essay! I love the small subset of films that use extreme realistic depictions of the past to explore the fantastic.

    • @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat
      @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you very much!
      Me too! I'd say A Field In England and The Witch are probably my favourites.

  • @Mink-yu8nu
    @Mink-yu8nu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you your wonderful explantion of this film.

  • @opngate
    @opngate 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    An astute and thorough examination of Wheatley’s choices in this film! Thank you! 👍🏻

  • @EmlynBoyle
    @EmlynBoyle 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love these videos and your analysis of each subject. Keep it up (and subscribed!) :)

  • @ViktorGlass
    @ViktorGlass 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you for putting the music credits in your videos i've discovered some great artists through that

  • @bodenlosedosenhose1590
    @bodenlosedosenhose1590 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    For various reasons I'm very much into in-depth analyses of movies, so this might be the channel for me. My first, superficial thought when watching the video actually was, "cool, this is like Lindsay Ellis, but in an English dialect and without the arrogance". You got yourself a new subscriber.

  • @danlinder2249
    @danlinder2249 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I stayed hooked with my mouth open for almost 9 minutes. Kudos to you, well done!

  • @webkahmik
    @webkahmik 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well done, you touched on many aspects, resonances that I perceived directly, even on a molecular level, in this film. Odilon Redon, Arthur Rimbaud, Baudelaire, Mallarme, etc. Damn, they're all Frenchmen! Salut!

  • @deanhundley4130
    @deanhundley4130 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing and beautiful analysis. This really moved me.

  • @Mediumreginald
    @Mediumreginald ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is there any analysis out there that touches on the occult themes of the movie? I feel like it’s begging for a full analysis

  • @averystanley265
    @averystanley265 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great Video! I always find myself watching them over again to really appreciate them, they are very dense! I would love to see a video on your views of the Grand Budapest Hotel or Baby Driver, some of my favorites.

    • @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat
      @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you very much!
      No plans to do those yet as I don't have anything to say that I haven't seen said before. I always like to try and contribute something new. But sometimes I randomly get ideas about a film years later, so you never know. :)

  • @KajiCarson
    @KajiCarson 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    YES! I knew you were gonna do an analysis of this film sooner or later. Thank You!

  • @ОлегОленев-я3о
    @ОлегОленев-я3о 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just found your channel (via the David Lynch video, obviously) and I've been binge watching your videos. Really great stuff!

  • @TwoMikesProductions
    @TwoMikesProductions 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely magnificent video. A favourite film!

  • @SaintHaHaLOLZ
    @SaintHaHaLOLZ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You have such a penchant for story telling. I'm always impressed by the astounding quality of your videos!
    I'd love to see you do an analysis of The Voices (2014) or Session Nine (2001), and the use of mental illness as a tool and framing device in film. Or one of Brick (2005), cause noir (and neo-noir, by extension) is a beautiful genre that lends itself well to deconstruction and analysis.

    • @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat
      @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you so much!
      I haven't seen The Voices or Brick, but I really liked Session 9! When I started watching it I thought it was a bit schlocky but probably fun enough as I love abandoned buildings, ended up loving it by the end. Don't know if there's anything there I'd want to make a video about, but I have a rough idea about architecture/buildings/haunted houses that it would easily fit into. :)

    • @SaintHaHaLOLZ
      @SaintHaHaLOLZ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'll admit, it rode the line between uncomfortably tense and uncomfortably cringe for me (fuck youuuuuu), but overall did love it!
      Thanks for taking the suggestion, and you should definitely watch The Voices. It's similar to Session 9 in that it starts out a little clunky and awkward, but really develops into some great black comedy.

    • @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat
      @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It looks interesting, I'll try and check it out. :)
      And the idea I had for this month's video doesn't look like it's going to come together in time so the 'haunted house' idea might get bumped up the list. :)

    • @SaintHaHaLOLZ
      @SaintHaHaLOLZ 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just taking a wild stab in the dark, but is it going to revolve around 1) the concept of setting as character, or 2) the juxtaposition of fear and danger inside what's suppose to be a safe space (homes)?
      Can't wait to see what you have in store for us. I'm sure that whatever the video is for this month, it'll be edutaining and high quality.

    • @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat
      @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, I've misled you by saying 'houses', haha. It's not really about houses at all.
      If I get a video done this month, it'll be this one. Hopefully I can fit it in, and I hope it lives up to your expectations!

  • @marquisdekiel
    @marquisdekiel 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for a great review. In times of imdb reviews sometimes I'm not sure if the world has gone mental.

  • @shteevuk
    @shteevuk 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, has definitely made me want to rewatch this remarkable movie :)

  • @jamiedarlow
    @jamiedarlow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic analysis! Definately got a new subscriber, thank you for this video :)

  • @melpomeninelaj8881
    @melpomeninelaj8881 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Everything is great about your channel :) Keep it up!

  • @jonaswhitt4322
    @jonaswhitt4322 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man, back when people could make video essays in under 10 minutes rather than 8 hours.

  • @mrdog4288
    @mrdog4288 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Superb exposition.

  • @thiccboss4780
    @thiccboss4780 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    would it be possible to create a subtitles option that shows the name of each film currently on screen synced with the subtitles?
    i believe some other film essayers do that with the videos but because of the taxing amount of time it involves , most don't.
    but since the end of your video does contain a list of every film used in the video , then i would like to point out that half the job is done, and the creator could finish the job by implementing those subtitles or let the viewer embark on a scavenger hunt for these clips from longer films. regardless of either issue wouldn't impact the overall quality of the actual essay itself.

    • @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat
      @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat  6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      That's a great idea! I didn't realise this was something people did and had never thought of it.
      Thanks for the suggestion.

  • @FilmFallon
    @FilmFallon 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic analysis, subscribed.

  • @dragoonbabic
    @dragoonbabic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Finally got round to seeing this movie at the weekend meaning I now get to watch your video about it. Dbl win

  • @eon14873
    @eon14873 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    O'Neil did pull them in as the post is empty of the rope. Onlh noticed after about 4 watches

  • @zaroffhound
    @zaroffhound 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    a poetic clash with the prosaic, a bursting synaesthesia, seems to be riddled throughout too.

  • @calvink7210
    @calvink7210 ปีที่แล้ว

    i’ve watched your video many times, well done! not to over analyze, but i’ve gleaned that they’re in monmouthshire in 1648. one of them mentions that they’re in monmouthshire, and they mention Cromwell’s siege of Pembroke, which was 1648…who knows though 🙂 also worth noting, i’m of the opinion that neither Friend nor Jacob are real at all. i base this on O’Neil asking Whitehead if he is “…good in his loins”. Jacob was the one with that issue. I’m curious what the several references to hands might symbolize. anyhoo, great video. 👍

  • @radradder
    @radradder 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The aspect ratio of the film feels stetchy for all these close up shots. I would have prefered something more squarish. All these wide shots for close-up and empty terrain feels boring to me, but maybe boredom is a form of emptiness and the director succeeded in the message at the cost of me. Not everything is for everyone after All.

  • @sabrinakrisb4672
    @sabrinakrisb4672 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please please please do more film reviews like this

  • @seanlachut8298
    @seanlachut8298 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful review

  • @drewklenkel5539
    @drewklenkel5539 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    good commentary. I loved this movie.

  • @CVLTOTV
    @CVLTOTV 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review. Many thanks! :D

  • @orcaaaaaaaaaa
    @orcaaaaaaaaaa 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    great review!!

  • @Edward-xv3bo
    @Edward-xv3bo 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant, thank you

  • @dmoore4520
    @dmoore4520 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just watched the movie, and sure I was high... but the last 20-30 minutes were pretty unsettling. Specifically a few minutes. Idk how I feel about this movie at all right now.

  • @graveyardgxblin
    @graveyardgxblin 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You're really cool, you big film nerd :)

  • @zla3031
    @zla3031 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    New subscriber. Excellent videos!

  • @davidmoore8227
    @davidmoore8227 ปีที่แล้ว

    …… ya I watched this high, I don’t regret 10/10

  • @berbank
    @berbank 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your work is excellent. I'd like to see more from you. I tried to follow you on twitter but the account seems to be down.

  • @jonapello245
    @jonapello245 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    :31 BEN WHTEATLEY

    • @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat
      @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I know. :'(
      Typos will be my downfall.

    • @jonapello245
      @jonapello245 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Sorry to've been smarmy--I think this vid's great as is your taste in media!

    • @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat
      @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha, no that's fine! I was laughing about Whteatley for a good few hours after I realised. I still keep saying out loud to myself.
      Thank you very much!

  • @sarahl701
    @sarahl701 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    YES YES YES

  • @karenvaughn3567
    @karenvaughn3567 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks like a great film and story. Excellent analysis as well. Unfortunately, I can't actually watch the film because of the rapid editing/flicker shots.

    • @kev3d
      @kev3d 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You didn't miss much. It was quite dull.

  • @fiveagainstfour
    @fiveagainstfour 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Ben Whteatley"…!

  • @atillacelik2736
    @atillacelik2736 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's that movie at 0:26?

  • @ericwinick8296
    @ericwinick8296 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video... you just misspelled the director's name.

  • @bilbobaggins5752
    @bilbobaggins5752 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Also black and white reduces the capacity for an audience to find men in silly costumes acting wacky in fields as silly.

  • @stiofan5754
    @stiofan5754 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    they ate magic mushrooms .

  • @31webseries
    @31webseries 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I loved this film. And while you may not get some of the layers watching it as an American or another nationality not steeped in English History, you will still get so much don't let that sway you. This held 98% of my attention for 1:23 minutes. These days, that's saying something.

  • @82luft49
    @82luft49 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Being an arm chair history buff, I found this film to be too contrived, and very little to do with the rich history of that time period. Nevertheless the most interresting aspect of this in depth review was you. I subscribed.

  • @BasedBrooklyn
    @BasedBrooklyn 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    whomst is ben whteatley?

    • @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat
      @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      They're the patron saint of typos that you catch a second too late...

  • @flamesphere3144
    @flamesphere3144 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wheatley is spelled wrong😭

  • @kev3d
    @kev3d 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought it was boring as shit. Maybe you have to be on drugs to get it. But for me it was about a handful of guys who do almost nothing, go almost nowhere, take mushrooms and then kill each other. Not scary, not brilliant, just slow. A director trying too hard to be David Lynch or Terry Gilliam.

  • @colinhughes4559
    @colinhughes4559 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Couldn't get past that speech impediment. Get a new narrator ASAP.

    • @drewbobaggins5212
      @drewbobaggins5212 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You sad little man.

    • @drewbobaggins5212
      @drewbobaggins5212 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You sad little man.

    • @colinhughes4559
      @colinhughes4559 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@drewbobaggins5212 keep your pea-brained opinion to yourself you mewling quim. Away back under your rock, rat. 🤣

  • @CNNBlackmailSupport
    @CNNBlackmailSupport 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Black and white gives you more to process. Think about it...
    Would it take a computer longer to look through a list of programs, or through the files in a single complicated program?
    With black and white in a complicated area with texture, foreground, background, and motion, your mind is basically looking for a wifi signal that doesnt exist. Its searching for awhile, then finding a signal, checking whether it's public or password protected, attempting to log in, searching for the correct password, user name, etc...
    We use color as a shortcut to distinguish reality. Take that away and we have to actually work to figure out what's grass, what's clothing, what's a hat, what's a face, what's a tree, and what's the sky and clouds, with only shapes.
    You could also think of it as whether it would take you more or less time to figure out the model of a car by touch alone.

  • @BathedInMilk
    @BathedInMilk 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Another doozy. I wrote a thing about it upon release saying similar things. Always great to get insight on Ben Wheatley flicks

    • @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat
      @WhatsSoGreatAboutThat  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you! This'll probably be my last Wheatley video for a while, haha.

  • @BobHooker
    @BobHooker ปีที่แล้ว

    I read the movie as the men have been killed in the war and are being moved to the land of the dead