240ft lbs of torque is what pulls this away from the line. Not as refined as a European Diesels, lol is is designed and made in Europe! Buicks made in China, Korea my last two Dodge heavy pick ups were made in Mexico. I believe this Terrain is also hecho en Mexico.
I was thinking the exact same thing! Why on earth did they choose a smaller diesel for a *_mid-size_* SUV? Even the Chevy Cruze had a 2 liter diesel, and that's a *_compact_* sedan.
So far over 22k trouble-free miles on my ‘18 diesel since last May with an overall hand-calculated average of 40.4 mpg at a 75% Highway/25% City split. Have zero issues passing people at highway speeds even when loaded up with people and/or cargo (especially through the mountains), and still easily obtain low to mid 40 mpg while cruising at 75 mph. Best tankful to date is 48.6 mpg poking along at 72 mph during one of the multiple road trips we take annually, but the most impressive result was an almost 3,500 mile trip last summer from Ohio to Florida and back with the Terrain loaded up to 4,700# GVW with us and all of our stuff (Cat Scale verified), cruising at 75 mph the entire trip with the AC blasting for comfort, and still managed a 41 mpg average when it was over.
A question no on asked is not exactly accurate. With autonomous driving on the horizon, you will have to have a gear selector like this that all electronic with no traditional shift lever, and we will be seeing more and more of them as cars are redesigned
@@dvStl You can actually support vehicle selection of transmission position without those stupid looking buttons. Other automakers use a simulated traditional shifter with a flip selector. So yes, push buttons are not necessarily. They would've been better served to use what they use in it's Equinox twin. Furthermore,until autonomy is offered on this vehicle there's no need to implement an autonomy ready shifter. I agree with Mr. Smith. It looks tacky and it serves no purpose at this time.
Zvonimir Zgonc The engine is turbo charged so it packs quite a punch. Surprised me when I tested it and it accelerates quite well when merging on to the highway.
@@adogg619 in the rest of the world that 0-60 time in crossovers is actually adequate. How is that "slow"? lmao It will still comfortably do 90 mph on highways.
I don't understand why GM had to put this tiny low HP engine in the Terrain instead of the 2.8 diesel with 200 HP from the Chevy Colorado pickup. It would've done 60 at least 1-2 seconds faster with that and the fuel economy wouldn't be much different. Seriously, why GM? It doesn't make any sense! This engine is for a small hatchback, like a Chevy Cruze, not a large SUV.
It's pretty large. By modern standards it is in the compact class, but vehicles have grown so much in size in past decades it is pretty large by normal standards. Compare it to compact SUVs from 20 years ago. Compare the Toyota RAV-4 or Honda CRV from the 90s to today. They have all gotten large and fat and such a small 136 HP engine isn't going to be fast in one.
pretty large? thats what she said. Have you ever stood next to a Terrain? Its no bigger than a 2nd Gen Scion XB for christ sake! LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Well, it might not be large by your ridiculous American standards but it is pretty large in reality. It's 4630 mm long. My 1997 Volvo V40, which is quite a long car, is 4480 mm long. The Terrain weighs over 3800 lbs. Don't you think that's quite a lot of weight for 136 HP. The acceleration is pretty good considering the weight.
I like this car a lot. Looking to get this or the Equinox with the diesel. My only concern is the auto stop start feature. Heard mixed reviews about it. Wondering how it will do in LA traffic in the city.
I would also think that the start stop would be hard on the turbo since it’s not allowing the oil in the turbo to cool before shutting down. But I’ve also heard there’s a module that you can buy to circumvent the start stop permanently.
@@glitterkittensreid5079 "During our testing, the front-drive (Equinox 1.6t diesel)model was put through Real MPG's evaluations, and the results were an impressive 33.1/46.7 mpg, making this oil-burning family car one of the most fuel-efficient crossovers we've tested." Motor Trend
Nobody who buys a diesel SUV with fuel economy in mind cares about the 0-60 time. If I owned one I'd just be thankful for the mileage in such a big car.
I have owned my 2018 Denali new since October/September my wife drives it more than I do, and coming from ford, the Gen2 Sport Trac to be exact, It was hard to walk away from such a great midsize truck, and into the Terrain, we don’t mind the shifter as it grows on you, and we haven’t had any problems what’s so ever....
Better gas mileage than my 2010 Corolla. The 2010 Corolla was one of the most fuel efficient non hybrids of 2010 at 32 mpg avg between city/hwy. Only concern is the price of diesel being about 40 cents more per gallon at the moment in Northeast Ohio.
Hey at the very least drop that baby Duramax 2.8 I4 in the Acadia or the bigger SUV in the line. There is a biturbo version of the same engine in Europe GM’s.
I love the the "no shifter " buttons . Nothing to get in my way of putting coffee cups - mine on my side and wife's on hers - easy! It's the simple things that make life better :>)
Simple, yes, but the feel of the shifter, especially when leaving a parking spot or on long drives...I don't know, I still need a shifter. Diff'rent strokes...
There are some places a 0-60 time of 10 seconds would pose some discomfort on American on ramps but this time is plenty capable most of the time. There are still a bunch of newer cars that are that slow on the road. Use your blinker and get behind people worst case. Not a biggie for those that are used to taking a breathe.
While I would rather have the diesel version, my current ride is a 2017 Chvy Equinox with the 2.4 4 cyl. engine. Just last weekend, I made a 1,021 mile trip with it and achieved an mpg rating of 40 on the hwy. It's such a slow vehicle, I actually hate the thing. But, those mpg numbers are close enough to my VW diesel that it almost makes up for it. Still, if given the opportunity, I would certainly get the diesel over the gas version any day.
If GM equipped the GMC Terrain with the same engine as the 2014 Cruze TD (2.0L), it will consist of 151hp and 264lb/ft. of torque. For the Terrain, that would equate to about 25 City / 35 Highway
My wife's 1.6 AWD Ecoboost Escape get's 37mpg on the highway during summer months with winter tires still installed and 4-people in the vehicle. We live in Alaska and this through very hilly terrain. Our best on level ground and a warm day was 42mpg for about 100 miles - including tailwind :-) However, before this Escape was broken-in (not talking about 800 mile break-in), it would only get a mix of 22 mpg (27 mpg last winter with 60% city driving). Somewhere around the 8-10k mile mark is when it seemed to have more power and became much more efficient. I wonder what these GM diesel's will get once broken-in? I bet people will se around 45-50 mpg on the highway.
Have done multiple long road trips with mine and love it. Longest one was last summer and totaled just under 3,500 miles fully loaded with passengers and cargo, with lots of mountain driving, and cruising at 75 mph with the AC blasting the entire trip. Still managed 40.8 mpg overall, and have recorded several tankfuls between 45-48 mpg driving that fast when just myself and my wife riding around.
A great looking vehicle but would have put in this vehicle the 2.0.litre turbo diesel engine with the 9 speed automatic transmission and offered the straight six duromax diesel as optional choice, again with the 9 speed automatic transmission? A great combination ☺️? Power with economy. On both engine's, perfect.
I like the exterior design. Having a diesel would be nice on my long road trips. Although with my income I would never be able to afford a $32k vehicle. Once it gets down to the high teens on the used market I’ll put the Terrain diesel on my shopping list.
The energy density of diesel fuel is about 23% greater than gasoline, so when you compare similar diesel/gas fuel economies...you'll typically note that the diesels are that 23% better. There's no real magic with diesels. You trade the faster, higher revving combustion (typically requiring spark ignition control, though that's finally starting to change with HCCI stuff) of a shorter carbon, lower-energy-density hydrocarbon for the slower, lower revving combustion that works uses high pressures to induce ignition without a spark that uses the longer carbon, higher-energy-density hydrocarbon of diesel. You could go even farther in the long chain direction with fuel oil, wax, and coal (those latter ones would almost certainly have to be external combustion, aka boiler, engines), or in the short chain direction (propane and natural gas). These different fuels burn at different rates and temperatures and result in different emissions byproducts that have different "pros and cons" on the environment and human health. That's the plain truth. I do wish diesel fuel economy wasn't treated like magic, because it's not.
First thing that makes me have a 1.6L diesel engine is something from the European market, like a Skoda Octavia or Peugeot 208. Not a GMC Terrain. But still with mpg in mind, I would not mind owning one for long trips.
Melissa Bartlett GM builds very reliable diesels and they have a global engine division in Turin, Italy which specializes in diesels among other things.
I've been looking around for an eventual replacement for my Acura TSX sedan - wanting something with a hatch and AWD. I'm considering small SUVs but also now intrigued by some wagon models, but not luxury ones. Besides Subarus, there is the Golf Alltrak and Buick Regal TourX. It's interesting that the Golf Alltrak has about the same cargo room as this Terrain with seats up and down. Sure, the rear seat leg room might be a bit tighter. But why drive a large vehicle if it doesn't do anything for you. Some may like the view and actually use the extra ground clearance at times, including me, but 99%+ of the time being on the road, I would prefer the better handling of a car, considering I'm coming from the sporty Acura. Not saying this Terrain or SUVs are bad, just struggling trying to find something that I'm happy driving to work 30 miles each way that can also hold my stuff when I go camping.
So instead of putting the 2.8 Duramax engine, which is 181/369, they put a loaded 4x4 people hauler in jeopardy with a 1.6L 137/236? WTH? Why do US manufacturers have to screw everything up before they finally need to be bailed out by the tax payers?
Clicked on this as I'm looking at things to eventually replace the wife's CX-5, saw the shifter and went nope! I like the diesel, I like the GMC styling, would never get that shifter. I specifically bought the CX-5 because of the 6 speed auto with a regular shifter.
Where is the stylish interior that John mentioned in the video? Good thing it's slow too. GM truck & SUV interiors are lame compared to the competition.
Despite it being a diesel, it still has start-stop, just like the Equinox Diesel. I've seen it on all diesels except for the Cayenne Diesel, but for the ML350 Bluetec and the X3/X5 35d as well as the 328d and 535d. yes. And I know, start-stop is (and has been) the stupidest new feature on new cars these days as of 2019 onwards.
Good luck when the park actuator in the transmission fails to engage and it rolls away. Much rather have a physical rod or cable running to the transmission
Yea, when I think "professional grade rugged" I always think of a 1.5 liter 4 cylinder noise maker. I hope we get past this tiny "turboed-to-hell-and-back" trend soon. Whoever thought this would be a good idea across the board needs to get acquainted with a firing squad.
9.9 sec 0 to 60 mph for $32K as a tiny SUV that seats 5. You have to be kidding... Then they will say - oh no, Americans do not want diesel cars, they prefer gas engines. Fuck yeh if you price a small GMC SUV as Honda Pilot
I have this car, leased it back in November 2017. Likes: Engine (yes, Diesel), the shifter buttons, style. Dislikes: Pretty much everything else. It's like driving a metal bowl full of marbles. Bad workmanship, materials are not great, spends alot of time in the shop, rough idle, radio system - LOTS and LOTS of problems there. My suggestion, look at anything else.
So what? Are you trying to break a world record when you get on the onramp? So what if it gets 3 seconds quicker?? At the end of your trip, does really make a difference?
The 2018 redesign of the Equinox has one of the best, new car launches as far as quality for the first year. So, no it is not as junkie as the CR-V which has one of the highest repair rates in the segment.
Norm T I don't want to hear about reliability in a year old car. Talk to me when it hits 100k and see if it has been problem free like a Toyota generally is.
It's funny how everyone talks about the equinox how ugly it is I think Chevrolet need to do a redo on the equinox and try again because I do think it's ugly! GMC had their own style and there own way now they trying to be like Chevrolet ew!
One would be better off buying the previous generation Terrain or even a Pontiac Torrent which is no longer made than this underpowered excuse of a vehicle.
Tiguan TDI wasn’t even available in the U.S., and the best testing with the CX-5 Diesel only shows 34 mpg highway. I’ll keep my Terrain diesel that has no problem getting 40+ mpg at 75 mph while loaded with passengers and full of cargo, and also with full emissions crap intact . If I need to pull tree stumps out and tow heavy loads, I’ll use my truck.
GMC is an incredible business that mints billions of dollars in profit a year. As you just pointed out, the engineering is minimal and people love buying it. GMC and Chevy Truck are the most important things GM has. Now you know.
There's absolutely zero need for this wimpy diesel to be in this vehicle. It doesn't even have the best towing capability in its engine lineup. Plus you'll more than likely never recoup to cost of the diesel engine, seeing as diesel is more expensive than gasoline in most areas.
Diesels are not for grocery runs, more for people that do longer distant driving, that would be the only need for this SUV. One advantage I've found is it's a treat not to have to fill the tank so often , especially in inclement weather (VW TDI owner). One main advantage is a potential for a far greater engine life and there is where you may, might, maybe ,(HEH HEH) recoup your investment. Diesel fuel is more expensive but diesels are more efficient so that is a wash. I could be interested in this SUV if it had a bigger diesel and you didn't have to get a fully loaded version just to get the diesel engine. And get rid of the pushbutton transmission ...jeez, wasn't that something Mercury tried in the early 60's....nobody wants that. I think GMC really needs to rethink a few things.
It's a diesel, it makes it's power differently. more usable in the real world than a turbo gas motor. the 9.9 second figure is looong but how often are you pedal to the floor 0-60 in a Terrain? .. I do however believe that someone SHOULD make a tune for this thing asap. GM has a bad habit of electronically sapping the life out of their vehicles. I'd still blow people's doors off in it though lol.
JakeDrives I don't expect anyone t floor it, but if it's that slow with the pedal to the floor, imagine just a simple pass on the Highway would be agonizing
This is a beautiful SUV but Diesel engine is a poor choice. It's obviously under powered for the weight and Diesel are costly to maintain and fragile. On top of that those engines are great polluter. The 2.0 turbo mated with the 9 speed is a much better choice.
And then there are bone heads like you who dislike diesels without having any knowledge about them. You cant beat diesels in torque and efficiency. What happens when you burn 4 times morr fuel with v8 gas suv. I bet its not causing any pollution right?
The "bone head" used to live in Europe where 85% of the vehicule are Diesel. And btw the technology was invented by an European (Rudolf Diesel). Diesel are a big source of pollution like NOx and SOx which append to be be carcinogen counpounds. And why are you talking about V8 ? The gasoline engine is a very efficient 4 cylinder with direct injection and turbo.
We're in 2018 , not in 1990. Have you driven a diesel in the past few years? Diesels have DPF and DEF system, which makes them cleaner than older gas vehicles. You're right about bad engine choice. They should have put a bigger one. Finally, maintaning a diesel is not costlier than a gas car. What's more expensive are certain parts such as the fuel pump. And diesels are not more fragile. They are more PRECISE. They're stronger built, because they operate at much higher pressure.
I have the 2018 diesel Terrain and it has more than enough power surprisingly. I was pleasantly surprised with the acceleration and overdrive it provided when overtaking cars on the highway.
Watching all these Motorweek "Retro Week" reviews, I forgot new cars existed for moment.
I wish i could forget new cars exist lol.
Must give GM credit. Its good to see a 4 cyl diesel in a small suv. But it should have been a 2.0 diesel 4cyl or larger Displacement
Definitely. 137 horsepower is pretty sad.
240ft lbs of torque is what pulls this away from the line. Not as refined as a European Diesels, lol is is designed and made in Europe! Buicks made in China, Korea my last two Dodge heavy pick ups were made in Mexico. I believe this Terrain is also hecho en Mexico.
I was thinking the exact same thing! Why on earth did they choose a smaller diesel for a *_mid-size_* SUV? Even the Chevy Cruze had a 2 liter diesel, and that's a *_compact_* sedan.
@@glitterkittensreid5079 yeah, he meant this isn’t as refined as a Volkswagen, BMW, Mercedes-Benz etc. diesel
So far over 22k trouble-free miles on my ‘18 diesel since last May with an overall hand-calculated average of 40.4 mpg at a 75% Highway/25% City split. Have zero issues passing people at highway speeds even when loaded up with people and/or cargo (especially through the mountains), and still easily obtain low to mid 40 mpg while cruising at 75 mph. Best tankful to date is 48.6 mpg poking along at 72 mph during one of the multiple road trips we take annually, but the most impressive result was an almost 3,500 mile trip last summer from Ohio to Florida and back with the Terrain loaded up to 4,700# GVW with us and all of our stuff (Cat Scale verified), cruising at 75 mph the entire trip with the AC blasting for comfort, and still managed a 41 mpg average when it was over.
Awesome! Happy to hear those reports of mileage and driving experiences.
Any new updates? I'm looking into getting one of these diesels since they don't make them anymore , would like to know how they hold up.
Just imagine the yummy mummys that will end up putting gasoline in their husbands Terrain.
fantomtuba yeah I'm sure that car has caused some divorces lol
Probably the same lady I saw on TH-cam trying to put gas into a Tesla Model S.
Oh yeah my aunt put gasoline in my uncle’s GMC Heavy Duty truck. That wasn’t a cheap oopsie!
Lol just watched all the retro motorweek videos and he still sounds the same from the 80s
3:09 John: WE SAY UGH! (On the "WHY ON EARTH" transmission buttons) LOL
still better than Chrysler's "WTF I PUT IT IN REVERSE NOT NEUTRAL" ZF 8 speed auto. Ugh that transmission just sucks
Those buttons are stupid though lol
That gear selector is a deal breaker for me and a failure of a solution to a question no one asked.
A question no on asked is not exactly accurate. With autonomous driving on the horizon, you will have to have a gear selector like this that all electronic with no traditional shift lever, and we will be seeing more and more of them as cars are redesigned
Nicholas Smith They could have just put an extra lever on the column to keep the gear selector out of the way. Where it belongs in the first place...
@@dvStl
You can actually support vehicle selection of transmission position without those stupid looking buttons. Other automakers use a simulated traditional shifter with a flip selector. So yes, push buttons are not necessarily. They would've been better served to use what they use in it's Equinox twin. Furthermore,until autonomy is offered on this vehicle there's no need to implement an autonomy ready shifter. I agree with Mr. Smith. It looks tacky and it serves no purpose at this time.
@@dieselcoondog god no I hate that
@@matthewgaines10 push button was first use in the 50s from Chrysler.
A 2.0 to 2.5 liter diesel would be much better in that car
1.6 is for little sedans and hatchbacks..
Zvonimir Zgonc The engine is turbo charged so it packs quite a punch. Surprised me when I tested it and it accelerates quite well when merging on to the highway.
@@1515cci The 0-60 time is slow at 9.9 seconds. I could not live with that turtle.
adogg619 Realistically speaking, clocking cars from 0-60 really has no impact in real life driving.
@Steve Jones No thanks, I'll sacrifice a little fuel economy to have something quicker.
@@adogg619 in the rest of the world that 0-60 time in crossovers is actually adequate. How is that "slow"? lmao
It will still comfortably do 90 mph on highways.
I don't understand why GM had to put this tiny low HP engine in the Terrain instead of the 2.8 diesel with 200 HP from the Chevy Colorado pickup. It would've done 60 at least 1-2 seconds faster with that and the fuel economy wouldn't be much different. Seriously, why GM? It doesn't make any sense! This engine is for a small hatchback, like a Chevy Cruze, not a large SUV.
Large suv? the terrain isna COMPACT crossover.
It's pretty large. By modern standards it is in the compact class, but vehicles have grown so much in size in past decades it is pretty large by normal standards. Compare it to compact SUVs from 20 years ago. Compare the Toyota RAV-4 or Honda CRV from the 90s to today. They have all gotten large and fat and such a small 136 HP engine isn't going to be fast in one.
pretty large? thats what she said. Have you ever stood next to a Terrain? Its no bigger than a 2nd Gen Scion XB for christ sake! LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Well, it might not be large by your ridiculous American standards but it is pretty large in reality. It's 4630 mm long. My 1997 Volvo V40, which is quite a long car, is 4480 mm long. The Terrain weighs over 3800 lbs. Don't you think that's quite a lot of weight for 136 HP. The acceleration is pretty good considering the weight.
you can tell these engines are gonna fail because its too damn small to power that vehicle.
I like this car a lot. Looking to get this or the Equinox with the diesel. My only concern is the auto stop start feature. Heard mixed reviews about it. Wondering how it will do in LA traffic in the city.
I have the 1.6L diesel 6 speed transmission. To bypass the Auto/Stop feature, I put the car from D to L6. L6 is the same as D
Glad to hear that can be circumvented. Not trusting of the wear and tear on stopping every time you stop. Diesels don’t burn much at idle.
I would also think that the start stop would be hard on the turbo since it’s not allowing the oil in the turbo to cool before shutting down. But I’ve also heard there’s a module that you can buy to circumvent the start stop permanently.
The 2016s had a 305 hp v6, what happened to that? I drove one and was extremely impressed, it had a TON of power
Gov't is setting the MPG goal so high they have no choice but to try this approach
Thanks for making a video about the diesel!
I love my diesel 29 k miles no problems great fuel consumption, it’s not slow at all
Awesome! Hope that runs good like that for another 300,000!
Have the same engine in my Cruze, but mated with a 6 speed manual. LOVE it!
Car and Driver got best in segment 38 mpg in their testing of the diesel Equinox/Terrain.
That mileage is outstanding. Average economy of 34mpg or 7.0 litres/100 kilometres.
@@glitterkittensreid5079
"During our testing, the front-drive (Equinox 1.6t diesel)model was put through Real MPG's evaluations, and the results were an impressive 33.1/46.7 mpg, making this oil-burning family car one of the most fuel-efficient crossovers we've tested." Motor Trend
If you want to save console space, how about you just put the gear lever on the column, as it should be?
Nobody who buys a diesel SUV with fuel economy in mind cares about the 0-60 time. If I owned one I'd just be thankful for the mileage in such a big car.
slick_ej6 tell that to every TDI customer. You are clueless
looks nicer than the blazer
lol not by a long shot.
34 mpg in that!? Impressive.
I wonder how reliable the transmission is
I have owned my 2018 Denali new since October/September my wife drives it more than I do, and coming from ford, the Gen2 Sport Trac to be exact, It was hard to walk away from such a great midsize truck, and into the Terrain, we don’t mind the shifter as it grows on you, and we haven’t had any problems what’s so ever....
Does it have the auto Stop/Start? Way too much money, as well.
Better gas mileage than my 2010 Corolla. The 2010 Corolla was one of the most fuel efficient non hybrids of 2010 at 32 mpg avg between city/hwy. Only concern is the price of diesel being about 40 cents more per gallon at the moment in Northeast Ohio.
Why does this video have 'unsolved mysteries' music in the background?!
Why GM didn't put the Colorado diesel in this confuses me still??
Hey at the very least drop that baby Duramax 2.8 I4 in the Acadia or the bigger SUV in the line. There is a biturbo version of the same engine in Europe GM’s.
It wasnt designed to fit the V style engine. Let alone a bigger one
I love the the "no shifter " buttons . Nothing to get in my way of putting coffee cups - mine on my side and wife's on hers - easy!
It's the simple things that make life better :>)
Simple, yes, but the feel of the shifter, especially when leaving a parking spot or on long drives...I don't know, I still need a shifter. Diff'rent strokes...
stupid8911 some of the first American automatic cars came with push button transmissions with no shifter. funny how now its a step back
Is GMC still offering a diesel on these? Curious
2019 was the last year for the Diesel. 2020 was the last year for the 2.0T.
There are some places a 0-60 time of 10 seconds would pose some discomfort on American on ramps but this time is plenty capable most of the time. There are still a bunch of newer cars that are that slow on the road. Use your blinker and get behind people worst case. Not a biggie for those that are used to taking a breathe.
If they wanted to save shifter space they could've just pulled a Chrysler/Jaguar/Ford and done a dial...
Why isn't the Yukon getting a diesel??
It is getting a 3.0 6 cylinder
Oil burner turbo diesel
While I would rather have the diesel version, my current ride is a 2017 Chvy Equinox with the 2.4 4 cyl. engine. Just last weekend, I made a 1,021 mile trip with it and achieved an mpg rating of 40 on the hwy. It's such a slow vehicle, I actually hate the thing. But, those mpg numbers are close enough to my VW diesel that it almost makes up for it. Still, if given the opportunity, I would certainly get the diesel over the gas version any day.
That 2.4 I4 has numerous issues. The most serious is the oil burning.
If GM equipped the GMC Terrain with the same engine as the 2014 Cruze TD (2.0L), it will consist of 151hp and 264lb/ft. of torque. For the Terrain, that would equate to about 25 City / 35 Highway
Why not GMC make it 2021 4 cylinder Diesel engine thanks
gmc needs diesels to set them apart from chevy. but the diesel needs to be able to tow more than other engines offered.
Chevy has diesel
Does it sell in eu
GMC needs to bring out a diesel in their hole SUV crossover lineup I would definitely spend my hard-earned money on a Yukon diesel or Yukon XL diesel
Did you end up buying a Yukon diesel?
Es buena opción pero tiene un precio muy alto para lo que ofrece como 1.6 litros y esa cantidad de HP es muy bajo para sus respectivos precios.
My wife's 1.6 AWD Ecoboost Escape get's 37mpg on the highway during summer months with winter tires still installed and 4-people in the vehicle. We live in Alaska and this through very hilly terrain. Our best on level ground and a warm day was 42mpg for about 100 miles - including tailwind :-)
However, before this Escape was broken-in (not talking about 800 mile break-in), it would only get a mix of 22 mpg (27 mpg last winter with 60% city driving). Somewhere around the 8-10k mile mark is when it seemed to have more power and became much more efficient.
I wonder what these GM diesel's will get once broken-in? I bet people will se around 45-50 mpg on the highway.
Have done multiple long road trips with mine and love it. Longest one was last summer and totaled just under 3,500 miles fully loaded with passengers and cargo, with lots of mountain driving, and cruising at 75 mph with the AC blasting the entire trip. Still managed 40.8 mpg overall, and have recorded several tankfuls between 45-48 mpg driving that fast when just myself and my wife riding around.
The engine IS a European produced motor!
How much- ?
Reminds me of when GM offered diesel engines as an option starting in 1979.
A great looking vehicle but would have put in this vehicle the 2.0.litre turbo diesel engine with the 9 speed automatic transmission and offered the straight six duromax diesel as optional choice, again with the 9 speed automatic transmission? A great combination ☺️? Power with economy. On both engine's, perfect.
I like the exterior design. Having a diesel would be nice on my long road trips. Although with my income I would never be able to afford a $32k vehicle. Once it gets down to the high teens on the used market I’ll put the Terrain diesel on my shopping list.
The energy density of diesel fuel is about 23% greater than gasoline, so when you compare similar diesel/gas fuel economies...you'll typically note that the diesels are that 23% better.
There's no real magic with diesels. You trade the faster, higher revving combustion (typically requiring spark ignition control, though that's finally starting to change with HCCI stuff) of a shorter carbon, lower-energy-density hydrocarbon for the slower, lower revving combustion that works uses high pressures to induce ignition without a spark that uses the longer carbon, higher-energy-density hydrocarbon of diesel. You could go even farther in the long chain direction with fuel oil, wax, and coal (those latter ones would almost certainly have to be external combustion, aka boiler, engines), or in the short chain direction (propane and natural gas). These different fuels burn at different rates and temperatures and result in different emissions byproducts that have different "pros and cons" on the environment and human health. That's the plain truth. I do wish diesel fuel economy wasn't treated like magic, because it's not.
Love not having ads.
First thing that makes me have a 1.6L diesel engine is something from the European market, like a Skoda Octavia or Peugeot 208. Not a GMC Terrain. But still with mpg in mind, I would not mind owning one for long trips.
Melissa Bartlett GM builds very reliable diesels and they have a global engine division in Turin, Italy which specializes in diesels among other things.
I've been looking around for an eventual replacement for my Acura TSX sedan - wanting something with a hatch and AWD. I'm considering small SUVs but also now intrigued by some wagon models, but not luxury ones. Besides Subarus, there is the Golf Alltrak and Buick Regal TourX. It's interesting that the Golf Alltrak has about the same cargo room as this Terrain with seats up and down. Sure, the rear seat leg room might be a bit tighter. But why drive a large vehicle if it doesn't do anything for you. Some may like the view and actually use the extra ground clearance at times, including me, but 99%+ of the time being on the road, I would prefer the better handling of a car, considering I'm coming from the sporty Acura. Not saying this Terrain or SUVs are bad, just struggling trying to find something that I'm happy driving to work 30 miles each way that can also hold my stuff when I go camping.
So instead of putting the 2.8 Duramax engine, which is 181/369, they put a loaded 4x4 people hauler in jeopardy with a 1.6L 137/236? WTH? Why do US manufacturers have to screw everything up before they finally need to be bailed out by the tax payers?
Emissions requirements 😖😖
Clicked on this as I'm looking at things to eventually replace the wife's CX-5, saw the shifter and went nope! I like the diesel, I like the GMC styling, would never get that shifter. I specifically bought the CX-5 because of the 6 speed auto with a regular shifter.
Chev Equinox has the shifter on the console.
Somebody mention the premium fuel requirement! Tell us that if we want the good engine, we will have to pay for premium fuel!
I will never own a car with a shifter like that
I can understand
though I still find it better than Chrysler's ZF 8 speed automatic. That was a stupid transmission that should be discontinued now.
its a shame they put such small gas tanks in these, 18 or 19 would be much nicer avg 500+ per tank
Damn.... 34mpg avg! BUT that 1950's push-button Shifter is a DEAL BREAKER!
Twin corporate model is Chevy Equinox as it has the floor mounted shifter. Even has the up and down tabs to manually shift on top of the gear shifter.
I’d stay away from those equinoxes. Terrible transmissions, engines burn oil and rear main seals go out
Great video but no SUV or truck should be a 4 cyl and not that much money
My Volvo XC60 has a 316-hp 2.0-liter four. I felt the same way you did at one point. I don't any more. Great fuel economy, plenty of power.
and definitely not wit that 10sec 0-60 time lmaoo A Highlander hybrid can do better than that
JabbaDuhHut But your Volvo has way better performance and power than this piece of crap
This thing is wayyy over priced! Should max out at 33-34 k equinox should max at 29k
aayonce4 Yeah they were way too confident in the price
I didn't know this existed. Wild.
This is good engine and better fuel economy I love it
Just can’t see the long term reliability here...
Where is the stylish interior that John mentioned in the video? Good thing it's slow too. GM truck & SUV interiors are lame compared to the competition.
GM really screwed up with this engine. Offer a diesel great! But make it a 2.0 or 2.4 what an anemic engine.
Despite it being a diesel, it still has start-stop, just like the Equinox Diesel. I've seen it on all diesels except for the Cayenne Diesel, but for the ML350 Bluetec and the X3/X5 35d as well as the 328d and 535d. yes. And I know, start-stop is (and has been) the stupidest new feature on new cars these days as of 2019 onwards.
Make that 2021 and 2022 I love it Diesel engine and good for the 4 cylinder 1.6 engine is better then other
Good luck when the park actuator in the transmission fails to engage and it rolls away. Much rather have a physical rod or cable running to the transmission
That was a great video. Good job
Looks like a mini van.
It is a European diesel...
It is supplied by Opel.
That 1.6 ecotec diesel engine is made by Peugeot.
When on earth GM will Make Diesel electric Hybrid engines.
👌🤔✌
Coconut Water Drinker locomotives
Yea, when I think "professional grade rugged" I always think of a 1.5 liter 4 cylinder noise maker. I hope we get past this tiny "turboed-to-hell-and-back" trend soon. Whoever thought this would be a good idea across the board needs to get acquainted with a firing squad.
kgbeezr75 thats a little aggressive
Sorry Guy. My fingers slipped. What I meant to type was that I think they should be issued a firmly-yet-peacefully worded memorandum.
9.9 sec 0 to 60 mph for $32K as a tiny SUV that seats 5. You have to be kidding... Then they will say - oh no, Americans do not want diesel cars, they prefer gas engines. Fuck yeh if you price a small GMC SUV as Honda Pilot
I have this car, leased it back in November 2017. Likes: Engine (yes, Diesel), the shifter buttons, style. Dislikes: Pretty much everything else. It's like driving a metal bowl full of marbles. Bad workmanship, materials are not great, spends alot of time in the shop, rough idle, radio system - LOTS and LOTS of problems there. My suggestion, look at anything else.
10 seconds to 60. Wtf
So what? Are you trying to break a world record when you get on the onramp? So what if it gets 3 seconds quicker?? At the end of your trip, does really make a difference?
I know right! This 0-60 is useless info for all car reviews.
Used to be 15 - 20 seconds back 35 years ago.
So is this one not a complete piece of junk like the equinox?
Tool0GT92 no, this is junk aswell………
The 2018 redesign of the Equinox has one of the best, new car launches as far as quality for the first year. So, no it is not as junkie as the CR-V which has one of the highest repair rates in the segment.
Norm T it's been out for a year let's not start talking about reliability yet.
Tool0GT92 Truedelta has quarterly updates as the 2018 Equinox has proven to be as reliable as the oldest in the segment the RAV4.
Norm T I don't want to hear about reliability in a year old car. Talk to me when it hits 100k and see if it has been problem free like a Toyota generally is.
Not sure how I feel about this "floating roof design" fad, but the push button transmissions have got to go.
It's funny how everyone talks about the equinox how ugly it is I think Chevrolet need to do a redo on the equinox and try again because I do think it's ugly! GMC had their own style and there own way now they trying to be like Chevrolet ew!
One would be better off buying the previous generation Terrain or even a Pontiac Torrent which is no longer made than this underpowered excuse of a vehicle.
The new VW Tiguan diesel embarrasses this. Same with the Mazda CX5 2.2L diesel. GM is terrible
Tiguan TDI wasn’t even available in the U.S., and the best testing with the CX-5 Diesel only shows 34 mpg highway. I’ll keep my Terrain diesel that has no problem getting 40+ mpg at 75 mph while loaded with passengers and full of cargo, and also with full emissions crap intact . If I need to pull tree stumps out and tow heavy loads, I’ll use my truck.
My God that outro music is hideous. (Do like the channel though).
I continue to wonder why GMC even exists. You can get the exact same vehicles from Chevrolet. And for less money.
It's more premium.
GMC is an incredible business that mints billions of dollars in profit a year. As you just pointed out, the engineering is minimal and people love buying it. GMC and Chevy Truck are the most important things GM has. Now you know.
GMC also serves as a premium truck brand for Cadillac dealerships so they can sell and get in on the lucrative pickup truck business.
The only reason they can put little 4 bangers in these cars now is because the undercarriages are made of tinfoil
Imagine rolling coal in it!
A Masculine car..
just give me a damn shifter and not buttons.
OMG that shifter is pathetic....BUahahahahHahahaha
Interior is still pretty tacky.
Add sails for this clunker in order for it to pass a Yugo on the freeway. 1.6 liter lol
economy weicle
There's absolutely zero need for this wimpy diesel to be in this vehicle. It doesn't even have the best towing capability in its engine lineup. Plus you'll more than likely never recoup to cost of the diesel engine, seeing as diesel is more expensive than gasoline in most areas.
Diesels are not for grocery runs, more for people that do longer distant driving, that would be the only need for this SUV. One advantage I've found is it's a treat not to have to fill the tank so often , especially in inclement weather (VW TDI owner). One main advantage is a potential for a far greater engine life and there is where you may, might, maybe ,(HEH HEH) recoup your investment.
Diesel fuel is more expensive but diesels are more efficient so that is a wash.
I could be interested in this SUV if it had a bigger diesel and you didn't have to get a fully loaded version just to get the diesel engine. And get rid of the pushbutton transmission ...jeez, wasn't that something Mercury tried in the early 60's....nobody wants that.
I think GMC really needs to rethink a few things.
tiny turbo = no go much rather have a bigger motor that's not running at 100 % capacity all the time .plus you get better real world mpg
Good luck on that everybody has tiny motors now. It's almost like v6 are becoming a thing of the past in mid-size anyting
Bad, bad case of the uglies. No thanks.
And that shifter? My God, no.
Nope Nope Nope.....I would buy a 5yr old used Mercedes Benz, before a low grade brand new gm.
hearsedriver1968 well, good luck with that
One of the most stupid design for gears shifters WTF
Looks like a Kia
Omg, the shifter buttons are horrific!! Absolutely awful design.
This has got to be one of the worlds worst toilets. Its garbage. Who would be so ignorant to buy this roach? GM just cannot build anything but junk.
What a joke, 10 sec 0-60??? The cheapest junk out there, the versa, is at least 9.2 sec. Go back to school GM
0-60 = 9.9 NOPE NOPE NOPE lol good luck merging lmaooo but that brake distance was nice
Keye T only Americans need a 0-60 time of less than 10 seconds in order to merge onto a highway.
You don't even need that.. only 15 years ago faster than 13 or so seconds was perfectly acceptable
It's a diesel, it makes it's power differently. more usable in the real world than a turbo gas motor. the 9.9 second figure is looong but how often are you pedal to the floor 0-60 in a Terrain? .. I do however believe that someone SHOULD make a tune for this thing asap. GM has a bad habit of electronically sapping the life out of their vehicles. I'd still blow people's doors off in it though lol.
JakeDrives I don't expect anyone t floor it, but if it's that slow with the pedal to the floor, imagine just a simple pass on the Highway would be agonizing
will2993 i get that but 15 years ago there were less cars on the road, less traffic and lower speed limits
That interior is so bad
This is a beautiful SUV but Diesel engine is a poor choice. It's obviously under powered for the weight and Diesel are costly to maintain and fragile. On top of that those engines are great polluter. The 2.0 turbo mated with the 9 speed is a much better choice.
And then there are bone heads like you who dislike diesels without having any knowledge about them. You cant beat diesels in torque and efficiency. What happens when you burn 4 times morr fuel with v8 gas suv. I bet its not causing any pollution right?
The "bone head" used to live in Europe where 85% of the vehicule are Diesel. And btw the technology was invented by an European (Rudolf Diesel). Diesel are a big source of pollution like NOx and SOx which append to be be carcinogen counpounds. And why are you talking about V8 ? The gasoline engine is a very efficient 4 cylinder with direct injection and turbo.
We're in 2018 , not in 1990. Have you driven a diesel in the past few years? Diesels have DPF and DEF system, which makes them cleaner than older gas vehicles. You're right about bad engine choice. They should have put a bigger one. Finally, maintaning a diesel is not costlier than a gas car. What's more expensive are certain parts such as the fuel pump. And diesels are not more fragile. They are more PRECISE. They're stronger built, because they operate at much higher pressure.
I have the 2018 diesel Terrain and it has more than enough power surprisingly. I was pleasantly surprised with the acceleration and overdrive it provided when overtaking cars on the highway.
MAGA; it's also made in Mexico. LOL
Ugly SUV with pathetic engine. Complete fail.