BYU supermileage vehicle: 1,300 MPG and counting

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 14

  • @cougarfanforever
    @cougarfanforever 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Threw me off guard when they said 25 mph :)

  • @sarang-audumbarakanaturalf3334
    @sarang-audumbarakanaturalf3334 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Useful for shipping !

  • @EZCarnivore
    @EZCarnivore 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I want to know how quickly the MPG diminishes at higher speeds; I think just 500 MPG would be perfect for a lot of consumer applications if it could go 40 or 50 mph. Super cheap daily commute!

  • @muhammadaliqaisar1377
    @muhammadaliqaisar1377 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    hai sir i want engine details for my lab report

  • @subramaniangood
    @subramaniangood 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful.

  • @smitadam7108
    @smitadam7108 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ладно, а какую скорость он может своим накатом держать? И вообще до скольки разгоняется?

  • @JRMCNEA
    @JRMCNEA 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A horse and buggy would be more fuel efficient. and faster. Horses run 30 mph Can pull a cart t about 28. Make it 2 horses and you can go 30 easy. Technology is supposed to advance us. Not be novelty... Did I mention I would be able to carry more than one person? and the people weigh more than 100 pounds?

  • @Godscountry2732
    @Godscountry2732 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why not build vehicle that at least minnick's a small motorcycle in ride height,handling,etc then wrap it into a streamlined ,aerodynamic body.Lets show these kids how inefficient today's vehicles are.Most mid to large cruiser motorcycles do no better then you average mid size 4 cylinder car in mpg,averaging 30 -50 mpg.Take those same motorcycles and wrap a aerodynamic body around it and most will double the mpg performance.This is sending the wrong message,that ultra efficient vehicles are impractical,and ultra expensive to produce.Thats all we ever hear,it would be cost prohibitive to build a efficient vehicle or a house with 16 inch walls,it always involves expensive one off materials,etc or some expensive manufacturing procedure.The truth is energy companies would lose billions in lost sales annually and thats just not acceptable to a lot of people..Just a fleet of semi tractor trailers ,diesel [airflow trucking] would cost them billion's in lost revue,annually,imagine world wide.Now add efficient cars,enclosed motorcycles,etc it would be good for planet Earth and our pockets,but the energy companies and they're stock holders,haha,you think the rich are concerned about gas,diesel,prices,never.

  • @TechdubberStudios
    @TechdubberStudios 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ferrari would hire you.

  • @egn83b
    @egn83b 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    That is a lot of miles from a tiny amount of fuel but not realistic.

  • @Godscountry2732
    @Godscountry2732 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    we can build efficient,safe and comfortable road vehicles right now.The powers in play,would not be happy saving billions in fuel cost,practically overnight.They can't handle looses like that,our entire country is held hostage by energy costs.We could be exporting oil,instead of importing it

  • @maikmicky5268
    @maikmicky5268 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    there is a waste-of-space. please look at hs 132. or a motorcycle-stance.

  • @israelespitia5930
    @israelespitia5930 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    what if i told you all i can top the speed limit to 80 and mpg to 1400

  • @MUSCLECREWDave
    @MUSCLECREWDave 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thats cheating if you cut the engine off and coast it for distances. Any engine can do that, nascar been doin that for years between green flags. Nothing special there