Gloria Steinem says that white women who supported President Trump in 2016 were voting for their husbands' interests, rather than their own. Do you agree?
My response below. She is an arrogant person who has no respect for other women unless they agree with her agenda. Though I do not support Mr. Trump politically, I believe Ms. Steinem's assessment of women who may have voted for Mr. Trump (or anyone else who disagrees with her) as uneducated baffoons who can't speak for themselves is a disgrace and mockery of ALL Women. There was a time when she announced how proud she was of her sister who had gone back to school and graduated (I believe in her 50's) from law school after raising her children.
Only partially. I think many white women also enjoy their privilege as White and don't want to lose that (or feel they have.) Plus, so many of their churches, governments, clubs have insisted that the changes for women's rights, LGBT rights, rights for people of color are threatening their way of life and undermining their families.
@Eilliw Nodrog How can you make these assumptions about the people of welfare, the victims of police brutality, and people who have fled their countries with a simple hope of a better life with less danger when you have never lived in there positions? You don’t know the feelings faced when in these positions... so how can you assume they are all “lazy” if you’ve never had to overcome the same obstacles? You have no idea of the mental and physical challenges these people are facing, yet you are willing to give up hope on them? Based off of what? Statistics? News Sources? Why don’t you go have a conversation with a single mother of welfare, and ask them their story, open your heart and mind to those of others before making a statement about them...
I'm a democrat who loves a bunch of southern states. There's very little depth of thought in the arguments I get from my friends who are GOP and sometimes Independent (though there are a few Independents that have really spent time listening and thinking). It's a basic "I don't trust those Democrats!" with no time spent looking at the policies. It was revealing to me when I argued about Hillary Clinton with a friend from Texas. Over about a year, I slowly debunked all of his ideas about her. In the end, we agreed that her and Bill taking the White House furniture was dumb. But really, all the measurable arguments were something I could slowly pull apart. I still don't think he voted for her, because "he didn't trust her". But I have concluded that a lot of people are just voting based on a bumper sticker's worth of understanding. Is that true for women more than men? Yeah. A lot of them have less sense of needing to learn about the issues than their husbands. They watch less news and don't want to engage or think about big issues. Though I think that eases up as people make more money. I feel like if people weren't so paycheck to paycheck, they'd be more willing to invest their time and energy.
Loved the Podcast even more. But I was bothered by the pre and post narrator’s need to counter Gloria’s statement that the feminist movement believed that the reason that the ERA failed was because of economic resistance especially by the insurance industry reiterating that historians believe that Phyllis Schlafly was responsible instead. This gives the impression that the ERA was a cat fight between women instead of an organized silencing by the establishment to maintain the patriarchal status quo where Schlafly was a orchestrated narrative that hid this fact. All in all, thank you for a wonderful interview of an amazing feminist icon.
Oh, fah sure, it's always men's fault. EEKKK!! THE PATRIARCHY!! HEAD FOR THE HILLS! Guys, I can not make this stuff up. I could post what this man-bashing feminist just wrote on any feminist parody site and it would get loads of "likes" for its mocking tone. Feminism is nearly impossible to mock nowadays as it has become a parody unto itself. "Amazing feminist" - whoa, talk about the ultimate oxymoron.
@@hellogoodbye4061 Nobody said it was men's fault, she does not bash men, she has loved some of the most amazing men and they are still friends, she has lived a long healthy life and you are living in a dream world. Why must you hate on her?
"The TRUTH will set you free, but first it will piss you off" - Gloria Steinem The quote: The truth will set you free originates from John 8:32 Holy Bible, then utilized by Gloria Steinem a radical feminist from the 1960's with the identical ideology as the new LGBTQ+ ideology.
I'm grateful for all the women who fought for women's rights. We can vote, own land, object to abuse, and divorce. Know your way out of the woods before you go in. Men must take responsibility for unwanted pregnancies as well. They should pay their portion for medical, child care, and education expenses.
And just think about how y'all covered up the fact that you owned slaves with this myth that you weren't allowed to own anything. Keep the lies coming.
She is being misinformed all of her life. Too bad you can't teach an old dog new tricks. Way far than reality, women voted for Trump do not totally depend on their husbands, they are independent and strong women. One thing, I have to admit the host did an excellent interview.
5:02-I hate that hypocrisy...they were nice with you because you're a woman lol,if you were a man you'll have the same conclusion about them as they seems to be because they're manipulative and treat you better to attract you on their part
You didn't answer the question Gloria.(Referenced below) Instead, you circumvented the question and went on to insult the American Citizens to further your agenda and that of whoever you are associated with in the 1%. You could care less about the dignity or intelligence of women as a whole, especially those women who may have made different choices than you. There are plenty of Americans (men and women) who fought for the preservation of freedom which we cherish and that of which you were afforded the right as your foundation to carry out your agenda - despite the fact that we may or may not have agreed with your philosophy. You insult our intelligence and our integrity. Maybe you should pick up a copy of the Constitution of the United States and that of the State of New York. You might realize a thing or two and how our country operates. Carlos Watson: Have you had conversations in recent times with people who do support President Trump? and, and if so, what do they say to you? and what if anything have you (have you) learned? Or has it only reaffirmed what you already knew?" Gloria: "I really I mean If I were to pick one of the strongest motives for voting for him, Its Racism. its just a you know against Change ugh and against a feeling that an old hierarchy which gave them a right to a certain position and it may not be all that high a position, you know it may be white folks who are not doing that well economically, but feel being white is keeping them from falling lower - if you see what I mean. I think that the reason he has a slogan that Make America Great Again is because He's appealing to people who want to go back to the past. PS - I am NOT a supporter of Donald Trump. One has to wonder what kind of nation we have become where this is the best we can do out of the 330 Million people in this country. I AM a SUPPORTER of the Integrity of a Citizen's Right to VOTE in secrecy and without being shamed or bullied by one who might have an opposing view. I am a Believer in Roger William's "Lively Experiement" the thing we call the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and all that it affords - which - on a daily basis is being thrown to the side as a piece of trash. Wake Up America.
@donereally Oh, look everyone, this man-hater scrolled through all the comments to attack any and all lowly men who dare call this feminist out...she is the ultimate Steinman sheepie. This is a snippet of her comment "and the constitution you reference, it says it guarantees all of us equal treatment. and it says this over and over. if that is not the case, then it should be taken out. because everyone is trying to simply be treated in the way the constitution says it will treat us all." Now the questions begs for all of us normal people - can anyone even remotely translate this word salad, doublespeak gobblygook that seems to be regurgitated from her gender studies textbook? Damn, man-hater, you are one strange cookie. Now begone, return to that gender studies "research", nail that lesbian dance theory move, and, no, Karen, I will NOT get the manager.
@donereally Okay, man-hater, answer this straightforward question - What rights do men have that Western women, the most privileged and entitled subset in the history of the world, do not? Now this may be hard to admit, but there are none. But hey, give it a shot. Now remember, to prove me wrong, make me appear so, so silly, you only have to come up with ONE thing. Good luck, man-hater, you'll need it.
@@hellogoodbye4061 There was nothing "man hating" about either Gloria Steinem and what she said, or about that last commenter you were attacking. Sounds like somebody "triggered", to me.
@@brianscott9525 "Triggered" is just another desperate buzzword used by your ilk in a tepid attempt to discredit and silence any and all opposing opinions that do not tow your feminist line.....your insult only backs up my point. Thanks. And, you know, there's nothing more lame than a feminist giving herself a male name in an attempt to give the illusion that men support their cult.
Gloria Steinem says that white women who supported President Trump in 2016 were voting for their husbands' interests, rather than their own. Do you agree?
Who's Gloria Sternum anyway? She's scary looking.
My response below. She is an arrogant person who has no respect for other women unless they agree with her agenda. Though I do not support Mr. Trump politically, I believe Ms. Steinem's assessment of women who may have voted for Mr. Trump (or anyone else who disagrees with her) as uneducated baffoons who can't speak for themselves is a disgrace and mockery of ALL Women. There was a time when she announced how proud she was of her sister who had gone back to school and graduated (I believe in her 50's) from law school after raising her children.
Only partially. I think many white women also enjoy their privilege as White and don't want to lose that (or feel they have.) Plus, so many of their churches, governments, clubs have insisted that the changes for women's rights, LGBT rights, rights for people of color are threatening their way of life and undermining their families.
@Eilliw Nodrog How can you make these assumptions about the people of welfare, the victims of police brutality, and people who have fled their countries with a simple hope of a better life with less danger when you have never lived in there positions? You don’t know the feelings faced when in these positions... so how can you assume they are all “lazy” if you’ve never had to overcome the same obstacles? You have no idea of the mental and physical challenges these people are facing, yet you are willing to give up hope on them? Based off of what? Statistics? News Sources? Why don’t you go have a conversation with a single mother of welfare, and ask them their story, open your heart and mind to those of others before making a statement about them...
I'm a democrat who loves a bunch of southern states. There's very little depth of thought in the arguments I get from my friends who are GOP and sometimes Independent (though there are a few Independents that have really spent time listening and thinking). It's a basic "I don't trust those Democrats!" with no time spent looking at the policies.
It was revealing to me when I argued about Hillary Clinton with a friend from Texas. Over about a year, I slowly debunked all of his ideas about her. In the end, we agreed that her and Bill taking the White House furniture was dumb. But really, all the measurable arguments were something I could slowly pull apart.
I still don't think he voted for her, because "he didn't trust her". But I have concluded that a lot of people are just voting based on a bumper sticker's worth of understanding.
Is that true for women more than men? Yeah. A lot of them have less sense of needing to learn about the issues than their husbands. They watch less news and don't want to engage or think about big issues. Though I think that eases up as people make more money. I feel like if people weren't so paycheck to paycheck, they'd be more willing to invest their time and energy.
She’s a powerhouse. Yes Gloria, stick around. I hope you stay tell your 100 writing your wisdom. Thank You
Nice to see someone can relate to a man-hating feminists nowadays.
"she" "it" is a shamanistic monoculture.
Thank You, Gloria Steinam! ❤
For nothing.
@@mattgoulden4779 What's wrong with you?
Gloria C.I.A Steinem
There is a Word , it's Daren
its not "Darwen" (a uniquely gifted and lucky indevidual) it's "You" (a specifically dull and very unlucky individual). If you wouldn't mind, gtf. OK?
Thank you Gloria ❤️💯💯
Loved the Podcast even more. But I was bothered by the pre and post narrator’s need to counter Gloria’s statement that the feminist movement believed that the reason that the ERA failed was because of economic resistance especially by the insurance industry reiterating that historians believe that Phyllis Schlafly was responsible instead. This gives the impression that the ERA was a cat fight between women instead of an organized silencing by the establishment to maintain the patriarchal status quo where Schlafly was a orchestrated narrative that hid this fact. All in all, thank you for a wonderful interview of an amazing feminist icon.
Tactically stupid, but please do continue.
Oh, fah sure, it's always men's fault. EEKKK!! THE PATRIARCHY!! HEAD FOR THE HILLS! Guys, I can not make this stuff up. I could post what this man-bashing feminist just wrote on any feminist parody site and it would get loads of "likes" for its mocking tone. Feminism is nearly impossible to mock nowadays as it has become a parody unto itself.
"Amazing feminist" - whoa, talk about the ultimate oxymoron.
Yup, and I am a girl! Just to clarify I was born a girl, 70 years ago!
@@hellogoodbye4061 Nobody said it was men's fault, she does not bash men, she has loved some of the most amazing men and they are still friends, she has lived a long healthy life and you are living in a dream world. Why must you hate on her?
Power 2 the ppl!
The "People" and not the gender cult of "females". Niether the "Origin stories" of females and maternity. Such TRIBALISM degrades equality!
@@mattgoulden4779 🤔😐Says the white Nationalist. Get a clue.
4:34 CIA operative duhhhh
And your point is....?
"The TRUTH will set you free, but first it will piss you off" - Gloria Steinem The quote: The truth will set you free originates from John 8:32 Holy Bible, then utilized by Gloria Steinem a radical feminist from the 1960's with the identical ideology as the new LGBTQ+ ideology.
I'm grateful for all the women who fought for women's rights. We can vote, own land, object to abuse, and divorce. Know your way out of the woods before you go in. Men must take responsibility for unwanted pregnancies as well. They should pay their portion for medical, child care, and education expenses.
And just think about how y'all covered up the fact that you owned slaves with this myth that you weren't allowed to own anything. Keep the lies coming.
I didn’t know a Karen was just a white woman.
Just turn the TV off.
transvestigate now
She is being misinformed all of her life. Too bad you can't teach an old dog new tricks. Way far than reality, women voted for Trump do not totally depend on their husbands, they are independent and strong women. One thing, I have to admit the host did an excellent interview.
@ffter888 qT You don't know who Gloria Steinem is, dearie. You haven't the first clue.
Correct! Away with Steinem and her ridiculous philosophies. Do us a favor and just fade the hell a way into outer darkness.
She is not misinformed. She is the chief propagandist. Destroying communities for over 6 decades.
I hate Trump, but I don't know why.
A term for the white men has since emerged: Chads.
Actually, I thought it was called angry white male?
@@AN-vx2ls NORM - Non-Mobile Old Rural Male
She is so desirable.
@@talos2373 I'm a man and I think she still is.
5:02-I hate that hypocrisy...they were nice with you because you're a woman lol,if you were a man you'll have the same conclusion about them as they seems to be because they're manipulative and treat you better to attract you on their part
sounds bitter
Steinman motto - Men are to blame for everything!
You didn't answer the question Gloria.(Referenced below) Instead, you circumvented the question and went on to insult the American Citizens to further your agenda and that of whoever you are associated with in the 1%. You could care less about the dignity or intelligence of women as a whole, especially those women who may have made different choices than you. There are plenty of Americans (men and women) who fought for the preservation of freedom which we cherish and that of which you were afforded the right as your foundation to carry out your agenda - despite the fact that we may or may not have agreed with your philosophy. You insult our intelligence and our integrity. Maybe you should pick up a copy of the Constitution of the United States and that of the State of New York. You might realize a thing or two and how our country operates.
Carlos Watson: Have you had conversations in recent times with people who do support President Trump? and, and if so, what do they say to you? and what if anything have you (have you) learned? Or has it only reaffirmed what you already knew?"
Gloria: "I really I mean If I were to pick one of the strongest motives for voting for him, Its Racism. its just a you know against Change ugh and against a feeling that an old hierarchy which gave them a right to a certain position and it may not be all that high a position, you know it may be white folks who are not doing that well economically, but feel being white is keeping them from falling lower - if you see what I mean. I think that the reason he has a slogan that Make America Great Again is because He's appealing to people who want to go back to the past.
PS - I am NOT a supporter of Donald Trump. One has to wonder what kind of nation we have become where this is the best we can do out of the 330 Million people in this country. I AM a SUPPORTER of the Integrity of a Citizen's Right to VOTE in secrecy and without being shamed or bullied by one who might have an opposing view. I am a Believer in Roger William's "Lively Experiement" the thing we call the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and all that it affords - which - on a daily basis is being thrown to the side as a piece of trash. Wake Up America.
@donereally Oh, look everyone, this man-hater scrolled through all the comments to attack any and all lowly men who dare call this feminist out...she is the ultimate Steinman sheepie.
This is a snippet of her comment
"and the constitution you reference, it says it guarantees all of us equal treatment. and it says this over and over. if that is not the case, then it should be taken out. because everyone is trying to simply be treated in the way the constitution says it will treat us all."
Now the questions begs for all of us normal people - can anyone even remotely translate this word salad, doublespeak gobblygook that seems to be regurgitated from her gender studies textbook?
Damn, man-hater, you are one strange cookie. Now begone, return to that gender studies "research", nail that lesbian dance theory move, and, no, Karen, I will NOT get the manager.
@donereally Okay, man-hater, answer this straightforward question - What rights do men have that Western women, the most privileged and entitled subset in the history of the world, do not?
Now this may be hard to admit, but there are none. But hey, give it a shot. Now remember, to prove me wrong, make me appear so, so silly, you only have to come up with ONE thing. Good luck, man-hater, you'll need it.
@donereally Thank you, great statements.
@@hellogoodbye4061 There was nothing "man hating" about either Gloria Steinem and what she said, or about that last commenter you were attacking. Sounds like somebody "triggered", to me.
@@brianscott9525 "Triggered" is just another desperate buzzword used by your ilk in a tepid attempt to discredit and silence any and all opposing opinions that do not tow your feminist line.....your insult only backs up my point. Thanks.
And, you know, there's nothing more lame than a feminist giving herself a male name in an attempt to give the illusion that men support their cult.