The Amazing Heptadecagon (17-gon) - Numberphile

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 มิ.ย. 2024
  • More on the math behind this: • Heptadecagon and Ferma...
    Catch David on the Numberphile podcast: • A Proof in the Drawer ...
    More links & stuff in full description below ↓↓↓
    Professor David Eisenbud - director of MSRI - on the amazing 17-gon and its link to Gauss.
    See end of this video for a bit MSRI's address at 17 Gauss Way!
    Support us on Patreon: / numberphile
    NUMBERPHILE
    Website: www.numberphile.com/
    Numberphile on Facebook: / numberphile
    Numberphile tweets: / numberphile
    Subscribe: bit.ly/Numberphile_Sub
    Numberphile is supported by the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI): bit.ly/MSRINumberphile
    Videos by Brady Haran
    Brady's videos subreddit: / bradyharan
    Brady's latest videos across all channels: www.bradyharanblog.com/
    Sign up for (occasional) emails: eepurl.com/YdjL9
    Numberphile T-Shirts: teespring.com/stores/numberphile
    Other merchandise: store.dftba.com/collections/n...
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 1.7K

  • @numberphile
    @numberphile  5 ปีที่แล้ว +144

    Catch David on the Numberphile podcast: th-cam.com/video/9y1BGvnTyQA/w-d-xo.html

    • @elviraloiuselabas861
      @elviraloiuselabas861 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The most sides i know is the rhombicosidodecahedron it has 62 sides

    • @rews3873
      @rews3873 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ok

    • @rews3873
      @rews3873 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@elviraloiuselabas861 circle.

    • @thurlmusic
      @thurlmusic 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      numberphile, what if i found something for hendecagon (11) ?

    • @trummler4100
      @trummler4100 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've tried to follow your instrictions using Geogebra Classing and ended up with something close to a (20 1/8)-agon

  • @2Cerealbox
    @2Cerealbox 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3891

    This is like Geometry with Bob Ross.

    • @Geccobaer
      @Geccobaer 8 ปีที่แล้ว +113

      +Ryan N haha, my thoughts exactly! He is just missing the "here we draw some happy little circles"-part

    • @M3D1C2121
      @M3D1C2121 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      that's exactly what I was thinking.

    • @caixiuying8901
      @caixiuying8901 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +Bon Bon
      It's not intended to be an art piece tho

    • @bonbonpony
      @bonbonpony 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Marcello Chua Nevertheless, it serves better as a modern art piece than a geometric construction :P

    • @mstalcup
      @mstalcup 8 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      +Ryan N The result here was, indeed, a happy accident.

  • @6infinity8
    @6infinity8 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1993

    - [Prof. Eisenbud] "Oh, it looks like I made a 21 polygon by accident"
    - [Bob Ross] "There are no mistakes, only happy little accidents"

    • @mercylessplayer
      @mercylessplayer 7 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      he IS the mathematic bob ross

    • @jekyllgaming99
      @jekyllgaming99 7 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Bob Ross's art: Simple methods, beautiful results.
      Professor Eisenbud explaining a heptadecagon: Ditto.

    • @josefmuller6070
      @josefmuller6070 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Well, the Bob Ross references surely made the recommended video right under this a Joy of painting episode emeralx waters.

    • @majarimennamazerinth5753
      @majarimennamazerinth5753 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You've got to check out Tibees peeps

    • @thurlmusic
      @thurlmusic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      weird, i constructed 5-gon by neusis

  • @EvanG529
    @EvanG529 4 ปีที่แล้ว +273

    "I might make some mistakes"
    _Eyeballs a bisector_

  • @RealUlrichLeland
    @RealUlrichLeland 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2034

    This guy could be telling me that a plane is about to crash on my house and I'd still be relaxed.

    • @carlscabage
      @carlscabage 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      dorgesh nah you really wouldn't lol

    • @KoenZyxYssel
      @KoenZyxYssel 7 ปีที่แล้ว +133

      "So lets assume a plane is on a impact trajectory towards your house, the obvious course of action is to get out of the way but which way should you go? Now we calculate that but first we need some observations."
      Yep, death sentence.

    • @TarmanTheChampion
      @TarmanTheChampion 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@carlscabage whooosh

    • @TarmanTheChampion
      @TarmanTheChampion 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL

    • @Intrafacial86
      @Intrafacial86 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      “Oh, well, after taking into account all the errors built up, looks like it’s actually crashing two streets over and four houses down.”

  • @lumburgapalooza
    @lumburgapalooza 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1906

    at first I was like "how did it take 2,000 years to work this out?"
    then I saw the steps required and was like "oh..."

    • @Scy
      @Scy 7 ปีที่แล้ว +119

      Imagine all the fails.

    • @dalmacietis
      @dalmacietis 7 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      Well, for Gauss it took less than 15...

    • @dalmacietis
      @dalmacietis 7 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      +Sushi Nums It doesn't really work that way. When mathematicians do straightedge & compass construction, they don't ACTUALLY have to draw everything precisely; they just have to deduce what construction would yield what result and then approximately sketch that in the picture. As long as they have understanding of what they are doing, they don't need much precision :)

    • @dalmacietis
      @dalmacietis 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      +Sushi Nums Yeah, well you do have to be precise in your argumentation. But it's nowhere near as difficult as drawing this shape accurately ^^

    • @lumburgapalooza
      @lumburgapalooza 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      dalmacietis​​
      I said "the steps required", not "the number of steps required". Complexity, not quantity. Thanks though!

  • @imveryangryitsnotbutter
    @imveryangryitsnotbutter 8 ปีที่แล้ว +864

    "Now we draw ourselves a happy little 17-gon..."

    • @CharlesPanigeo
      @CharlesPanigeo 8 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Did you just make a Bob Ross reference?

    • @imveryangryitsnotbutter
      @imveryangryitsnotbutter 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Charles Panigeo
      What if I did?

    • @EmergencyTemporalShift
      @EmergencyTemporalShift 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I was thinking about his happy little accident.

    • @toadfrommariokart64
      @toadfrommariokart64 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Emergency Temporal Shift on this show we don't make mistakes, we just make happy little 21-gons

    • @ns8158
      @ns8158 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      My first thought was that he is the Bob Ross of Mathematics.

  • @londonalicante
    @londonalicante 4 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    2 and 17 are coprime. So once you have 2/17 marked you don't have to bisect it, just use your compass to count the 2/17 sized spaces round the circle and after going round twice you should get back where you started with 17 points marked.

  • @Taraalcar
    @Taraalcar 8 ปีที่แล้ว +672

    A real Parker's Square of a heptadecagon

    • @Azivegu
      @Azivegu 8 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      +Taraalcar we are never gonna let that go are we?

    • @NoriMori1992
      @NoriMori1992 8 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      +Azivegu Apparently not. XD

    • @NoriMori1992
      @NoriMori1992 8 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      A Parker-gon. :D

    • @EdwardNavu
      @EdwardNavu 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      We need a prefix for Parker's Square things. I recommend Parka- or Parko-, preferring the former over the latter.
      Ergo, it will have two names: Eisenbudo-heptadecagon, or Parka-heptadecagon.
      EDIT: Parkatetragono- is also nice, albeit a little too long.

    • @hansisbrucker813
      @hansisbrucker813 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Was thinking of this :)

  • @ben1996123
    @ben1996123 9 ปีที่แล้ว +755

    65537gon construction video please

    • @GothicKin
      @GothicKin 9 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Thulyblu
      I've never knew Gauss had to be written with a scharfes S until this comment. Now I feel ashamed.

    • @thulyblu5486
      @thulyblu5486 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Jacopo Barberis don't feel bad... the ß is of little use in my mother tongue of German... they should have gotten rid of it and replaced it with double s when they had the opportunity with the spelling reform in 1996

    • @GothicKin
      @GothicKin 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thulyblu I know it makes little sense to keep the scharfes and also reduce the words it is needed for. Get rid of it or give it a purpose.
      The fact is I've always studied math either in my mother language or in english and not too obviously the scharfes s was never used in any spelling. It was just curious to know that the name Gauss isn't actually Gauss. Funny enoguh, in his signature he didn't use the scharfes S but instead uses the double S.

    • @GothicKin
      @GothicKin 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Double vowel or the so unanbiguosly elegant ā. How can you mistake such a clear phoneme?

    • @GothicKin
      @GothicKin 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tartaros I prefer it, too. I love forgotten and once loved letters no one likes anymore.

  • @AnssiArpiainen
    @AnssiArpiainen 9 ปีที่แล้ว +450

    In the next video i want to see a heptadecaflexagon lol

    • @numberphile
      @numberphile  9 ปีที่แล้ว +92

      Anssi Arpiainen that would be something

    • @alexroberts8755
      @alexroberts8755 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      MatzeGamer It's a fancy mathematician's colour-shape puzzle

    • @Macvombat
      @Macvombat 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That book is quite a good read!

    • @Everfalling
      @Everfalling 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      MatzeGamer just google "hexaflexagon"

    • @bonbonpony
      @bonbonpony 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Macvombat What book?

  • @NicosMind
    @NicosMind 8 ปีที่แล้ว +369

    I like this guy's voice. Its so relaxing. If he ever did an audio book I would sleep every time no matter the subject.

    • @NicosMind
      @NicosMind 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Andre Vargas The man has a few career paths ahead of him. He'd be great doing a narration for a documentary.

    • @bonbonpony
      @bonbonpony 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +NicosMind Yeah... it's so relaxing it makes me sleep ;°

    • @durinviirathkh-guzukh7806
      @durinviirathkh-guzukh7806 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Andre Vargas yaaass

    • @Jawwnn
      @Jawwnn 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      +NicosMind its called ASMR ^>^

    • @edge-of-the-internet
      @edge-of-the-internet 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +NicosMind search up bob ross on youtube you will be satisfied

  • @DouglasZwick
    @DouglasZwick 7 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Maybe it's just the wine, but the story at the end there about choosing to be 17 Gauss Way instead of 1 Gauss Way made me tear up. Excellent video!

    • @Kuoxsr
      @Kuoxsr 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Same.

  • @MBogdos96
    @MBogdos96 9 ปีที่แล้ว +168

    Man, Gauss was unbelievable. Out of this world. I've never heard of any other scientist with that many contributions in that many different fields.

    • @frankschneider6156
      @frankschneider6156 9 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      MBogdos96
      John von Neumann ...
      he was probably even more brilliant and surely a lot more versatile than Gauss and no, i don't question that Gauss was one of mankind's most brilliant minds at all

    • @joaocandeias7093
      @joaocandeias7093 9 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Don't forget Euler!

    • @frankschneider6156
      @frankschneider6156 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      *****
      Yeah, to my knowledge noone else has ever published more mathematical papers than he did (not even Erdös) and like everybody i do love Euler's identy.
      Nonetheless i would would argue that he wasn't on the same level of genius as von Neumann was.

    • @984francis
      @984francis 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      ***** And Euler was followed by Ruler (groan).

    • @techwithwhiteboard3483
      @techwithwhiteboard3483 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Euler

  • @Rickmakes
    @Rickmakes 9 ปีที่แล้ว +267

    I liked the story at the end.

  • @peterjensen6844
    @peterjensen6844 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I find it fascinating that when David says (while drawing the Hexagon) "if I make the lines a little longer, its even nicer", I can see that if you DID make them longer, you'd get a triangle. That relationship of the circle, the hexagon and then the larger triangle is amazing to me.

  • @scottmanley
    @scottmanley 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1130

    I'd be afraid to go near a place with the address 17 Gauss in case all my credit cards got wiped.

    • @AtliTobiasson
      @AtliTobiasson 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Interesting!

    • @hansguckindieluft3019
      @hansguckindieluft3019 9 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      It´s funny how we end up on the same channels... I saw this particular video 2 days ago. Now you did. I suspect there´s some magic involved here...^^

    • @MikeAben
      @MikeAben 9 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      I saw this a week or so ago. I love straightedge and compass constructions, but pen and ink, that's hard core.

    • @leojciaccioii
      @leojciaccioii 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      dip safe!

    • @RealClassixX
      @RealClassixX 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Scott Manley Gauss in case? Math puns are by far the greatest of them all.

  • @jeaguilar
    @jeaguilar 9 ปีที่แล้ว +402

    Brown paper didn't work, eh? Love the old-school ink. (I can almost smell it!)

    • @numberphile
      @numberphile  9 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      Juan Aguilar you can smell it for real if you like... bit.ly/brownpapers

    • @MazeFrame
      @MazeFrame 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Numberphile Nice one^^

    • @jeaguilar
      @jeaguilar 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Numberphile Bid in. I feel like I should've bid 17 or at least a prime number.

    • @tabularasa0606
      @tabularasa0606 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's blasphemy!

    • @EndrChe
      @EndrChe 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Juan Aguilar there's something lost in the old ways.

  • @Harlequin314159
    @Harlequin314159 9 ปีที่แล้ว +120

    I collect things like compasses and I always assumed those types of ends were meant to pinch and hold on to a bit of pencil graphite or something. I never imagined you could simply dip them, empty, into ink like that. Spectacular!

    • @frankschneider6156
      @frankschneider6156 9 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Harlequin314159
      same here ... i always wondered what these things in the compass sets where used for and of course used the ones with a pencil ... feel pretty dumb now ... ancient technology can be quite mysterious- curta anyone ?

    • @MrZelenka4th
      @MrZelenka4th 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Harlequin314159 with those types of ends you can get different thicknesses of lines when drafting

    • @0fabe0
      @0fabe0 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      So did I. My best guess was that they were intended to hold razor blades, so you could cut out perfect circles.

    • @tuekyndal4805
      @tuekyndal4805 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Harlequin314159 you must be joking right... Lol....

    • @maryseeker7590
      @maryseeker7590 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s a ruler pen tip and it makes great lines with ink, paint and even masking fluid

  • @IKNOWITSADUMBCOMMENT
    @IKNOWITSADUMBCOMMENT 9 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    I think Profesor Eisenbud does some of these 'by eye' to safe time for the video,

    • @iyang2341
      @iyang2341 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      No way really?

  • @lawrencedoliveiro9104
    @lawrencedoliveiro9104 5 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    10:23 That’s OK, we salute you for trying ... a 21-gon salute.
    Thank you, thank you, I’m here all week.

  • @iSycorax
    @iSycorax 9 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    MIsspelt professor at 6:18, we do not forget.

    • @thulyblu5486
      @thulyblu5486 9 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      I demand the death penalty

    • @pete0mat
      @pete0mat 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Nah, he's just written it not in English :P E.g. in Polish it is exactly like that: one "f", one "s" ;)

    • @chardeth7732
      @chardeth7732 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Wizdomtrek Well then what penalty is fit for those who misspell "too"

    • @pete0mat
      @pete0mat 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      TD Shamu And for those who forget about question marks? (I'm curious what mistakes I have made here :P)

    • @orssidia
      @orssidia 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Piotr Matysiak None besides using an emoticon as end punctuation.

  • @beelzzebub
    @beelzzebub 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    That story about 17 Gauss way and the drawing of the construction on the front door was awesome!

  • @IoEstasCedonta
    @IoEstasCedonta 8 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    ..."was Gauss a mathematician?"

  • @brabenetz
    @brabenetz 7 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    He made a mistake at 6:20. THIS is the main reason of the false result not the inaccuracy. The correct lines are in the graph at 6:45

    • @aok76_
      @aok76_ 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Indeed. I followed up with him and I failed to construct it initially. Thank you for your vital comment. :D

    • @nianyiwang6659
      @nianyiwang6659 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      wow i didnt even realize it...

    • @olldernew6431
      @olldernew6431 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I try again and get 17-gon

    • @riccardosarti3234
      @riccardosarti3234 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Exactly, he takes one fourth of those segments but he should take one half of the string obtained from the previous string and its half point... did he do it on purpose to stimulate comments?

    • @aMulliganStew
      @aMulliganStew 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I tried the wrong way (6:20) with AutoCad, then looked up the right way and yes, it’s the same as 6:40. Perhaps in another lifetime I’ll sit down and puzzle out why this works.

  • @Imagine-Baggins
    @Imagine-Baggins 9 ปีที่แล้ว +506

    Can we have a Graham's Number-gon?

    • @DPlugarov1225
      @DPlugarov1225 9 ปีที่แล้ว +356

      We do. It's called a circle.

    • @usernamenotfound80
      @usernamenotfound80 9 ปีที่แล้ว +106

      Not with staightedge and compass because G_64 is divisible by 9.

    • @Imagine-Baggins
      @Imagine-Baggins 9 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      DPlugarov1225 I demand that each side be 1 cm long. Have fun constructing that...

    • @MrCreeperX
      @MrCreeperX 9 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      ImagineBaggins Would be physically impossible. Even if we cut up every single tree on earth, we wouldn't have nearly enough paper to even try and construct it.

    • @usernamenotfound80
      @usernamenotfound80 9 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      ***** A regular n-gon is constructible iff φ(n) is a power of 2 where φ is the Euler-φ-function. However, φ(9) = 6 is not a power of 2 and thus an enneagon is not constructible with straightedge and compass. Since 6=φ(9)|φ(n) if 9|n, neither are regular n-gons where n is divisible by 9.

  • @yesandno2217
    @yesandno2217 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You know, I really loved geometry in elementary school. I never was good at math, but I was always the best in solving geometry problems, because I loved to draw with my compass and ruler. I'm now sophomore in high school and haven't been into geometry lately. However, after watching how much you love to do this it brought a huge nostalgia to me. I think I'm going to draw some things right now, thank you.

  • @scowell
    @scowell 9 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Just to make it clearer, the professor makes the mistake at 6:12, where he continues dividing the line into quarters. You should proceed by dividing the segments once, extending the rays out to the arc, and dividing the angle for the final two 'quarters'... these tiny mistakes are enough to throw you off from 17 to 20-gon. Amazing when you see it work... I'm using CaRMetal, a wonderful free program.

  • @maximilianbur2560
    @maximilianbur2560 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    my lord his pronounciation of Gauss‘ full name was flawless

  • @TheMrSamusic
    @TheMrSamusic 9 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    +Numberphile there's a little mistake in the construction! At 6:00 when you have the circumference whose radius is half the original radius, you shouldn't divide the segment in half and fourth, but the arc of the circumference! So the right way is to bisect the arc and then bisect it again. :) I'm telling it because I spent much time constructing this amazing 17-gon hahahahaha

    • @TheMrSamusic
      @TheMrSamusic 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Numberphile

    • @psapunar
      @psapunar 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      i agree mistake was made. this is wrong construction u need to bisect angles not lines

    • @philliptobin3695
      @philliptobin3695 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah i attempted to replicate this numerous times and kept getting consistent 20 or 21gon. then i looked at the whole construction at 10:29....next attempt, I made a real heptadecagon on my first try. I used 005 fineliners and it looks beautiful

  • @RLCypher
    @RLCypher 8 ปีที่แล้ว +144

    Perform this correctly and you can summon Bakhtak to do your bidding, allowing you to turn your enemies' dreams into nightmares.

    • @inkolore2
      @inkolore2 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +Curly Fride Haha you activated my trap card

    • @THE1blueElephant
      @THE1blueElephant 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What game is this lol

    • @rrelrel
      @rrelrel 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      lol

    • @bonbonpony
      @bonbonpony 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Curly Fride Or make a transmutation circle ;)

    • @MustardPipeLibrary
      @MustardPipeLibrary 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Curly Fride Nah, that's what happens when you construct the 257-gon.

  • @JoelLeBlanc
    @JoelLeBlanc 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    5:43 "I love it" - I smiled from ear to ear when David said that!

  • @newspaperlightbulb
    @newspaperlightbulb 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    These videos are just amazing. Where else could you see such an influential mathematician like David Eisenbud explaining a fun little geometry project?

  • @Septagon
    @Septagon 9 ปีที่แล้ว +206

    I almost feel relevant...

  • @JoseyWales93
    @JoseyWales93 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    257-gon video please!
    Made me remember a very interesting homework one of my maths teachers gave me about 20 years ago: construction of 5-gon aka pentagon with ruler and compass. Since then I learned about the Gauss-Wanzel theorem...

  • @steveneckert5288
    @steveneckert5288 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love the comparison to origami. The precision required for a construction like that is amazing.

  • @acorn1014
    @acorn1014 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    11:24. What a parker square of a 17-gon.

  • @callummcgillivray9608
    @callummcgillivray9608 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When I was in high-school I did basically an engineer's drawing class as one of my electives. Every now and then we had to draw pentagons which is a little bit of a process (albeit easier than the 17-gon!) but mistakes were made and it was never accurate to any degree. So I thought to myself, if we can take the radius of a circle to make a hexagon surely there's a way to make a pentagon. After about a half hour of drawing and math I came to the conclusion if you take the radius of a circle and multiply it by I think 1.76 or something you'd get really close to the length of the side of a pentagon. Using that you can work backwards too. It's nothing fundamentally groundbreaking but for me as a 15 year old it was a cool and easy way to finish my exams quicker

  • @RnBoy15
    @RnBoy15 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I like this professor! It's so good to see how he loves the ink mark on paper, and condtructing geometry

  • @iabervon
    @iabervon 9 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    That 17-gon on the door should normally be sufficient to get visitors within one standard deviation of the right place 62% of the time.

    • @MrCooldude4172
      @MrCooldude4172 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I don't know what you are saying, but it sounds cool.

    • @buca117
      @buca117 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It would have been cooler if it was a real result of a calculation instead of just a mathematical jargon drop.

    • @oO_ox_O
      @oO_ox_O 9 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      buca117 It's not just random jargon. If you have a *Gaussian* distribution then the area (the chance) from one inflection point to the other (that's the mean minus and plus the standard deviation respectively) is indeed about 62% of the whole. Never had basic statistics?

    • @oO_ox_O
      @oO_ox_O 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      buca117 I didn't really intent to insult you, I just found it interesting that you apparently thought to be able to discern math babble from real stuff while not knowing about stuff you should learn about in secondary school (high school). But to be fair I really don't know whether they it's part of the mandatory curriculum where you are from so I am genuinely interested whether you had it. Considering how it's such an important topic, especially nowadays, I really can't really imagine that it's not, I mean how else could you even know what it means that e.g. a null hypothesis got reject with 95% certainty or what it means if the median is very different from the arithmetic mean value.

    • @buca117
      @buca117 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      o_O I covered standard deviation. I covered the normal distribution curve.
      I covered this material. I also am not a math person, so the fact that 62% of the normal distribution curve is found within 1 standard deviation slipped my mind, especially since I haven't touched that material in over a year and my college stats class was dumbed down to the point where I took three pages of notes the entire semester, missed a third of the classes, and still aced the class.
      Essentially, while this IS a Numberphile video, not only should you not assume that everyone here has a passion for math but you should also refrain from assuming that everyone has had as quality an education as you.

  • @CarnifaxMachine
    @CarnifaxMachine 8 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    5:30 into Heptadecagon and chill and he tells you....

  • @RobertRussellComposer
    @RobertRussellComposer 9 ปีที่แล้ว +123

    Didn't quite work for me (using GeoGebra). I got just a little over a 20-gon. Could it be numerical error? Has anyone else managed to replicate it perfectly?

    • @ikkohmation
      @ikkohmation 9 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Same for me on geogebra and for another with autocad (see below). Must be a mistake.

    • @RobertRussellComposer
      @RobertRussellComposer 9 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Either that, or it's rounding error within GeoGebra and AutoCad. I just tried it again in GeoGebra (using the inbuilt perpendicular bisector function rather than constructing all the bisections myself using just circles), and got even a little more than a 20-gon.

    • @thesimulacre
      @thesimulacre 9 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Also got closer to 20..i think there's a small error, and not the eye-balling type

    • @ikkohmation
      @ikkohmation 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I agree that some of the error is attributable to rounding. But I'm surpised we all (4 people) get a 20ish-gon. Should'nt we all get different polygons ?

    • @RobertRussellComposer
      @RobertRussellComposer 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Still... how much fun is it just to follow along?

  • @Cadwaladr
    @Cadwaladr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is one of my favourite numberphile videos. I keep coming back to watch it again. I suppose at some point I should try to construct a heptadecagon myself.

  • @Olect
    @Olect 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love doing compass and straight edge constructions. My Euclidean Geometry class in undergrad made me fall in love. Great video!

  • @88Nieznany88
    @88Nieznany88 7 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    21-gon? take every 3rd verticle and u made 7-gon!

    • @maxhaibara8828
      @maxhaibara8828 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      21-gon? divide every side by 100 and u made 2100-gon!

    • @bernardz2002
      @bernardz2002 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Max Haibara I dont think you can divide an angle into 100 equal parts using a compass and straighedge.

    • @mariosstamoulis7345
      @mariosstamoulis7345 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      +Bernard Playz just believe.

  • @StephanAhonen
    @StephanAhonen 8 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I repeated this construction in a piece of geometry software (geogebra) and I didn't get a 17-gon, but rather a slightly-more-than-20-gon.

    • @Monsolido
      @Monsolido 8 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Thank you for this comment, I did it on paper as precisely as I could and got the same result as yours. The accurate version at 10:30 doesn't match the construction in the video.
      There's a mistake at 5:56 He divides the 2 lines in quarters. Instead you only need to divide them in half, and let the bisections intersect the circle. Then draw 2 new lines between these intersections and the middle, and finally divide these in half. I guess he missed this step..

    • @akaRicoSanchez
      @akaRicoSanchez 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      The diagram on the door at 13:31 also seem to indicate double bisections of the angles instead of divisions by four of the chords. With this error, the professor Eisenbud stood no chance! :)

  • @elwynbrooks
    @elwynbrooks 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    That little end screen story was WONderful!! So sweet

  • @7zaxo
    @7zaxo 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very cool video and I loved the story at the end. Thanks for sharing!

  • @TheYear-dm9op
    @TheYear-dm9op 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Finally I know what that part of the compass is used for! :D

  • @madgunner01
    @madgunner01 7 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    the guy has the same voice tone as bob ross, I like it.

  • @foolishafraid562
    @foolishafraid562 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love these videos brady, keep up the good work.

  • @d.campbell3080
    @d.campbell3080 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Gauss's construction of the 17gon is absolutely beautiful. It would make a lovely painting.

  • @VienerSchnitzel69
    @VienerSchnitzel69 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Why is his voice so soothing wtf

    • @soylentgreenb
      @soylentgreenb 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you ever see Bob Ross?

  • @DC-zi6se
    @DC-zi6se 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    For beauty and volume: Euler
    For impact: Newton, Leibniz, Lagrange
    For range: von Neumann
    For insight: Riemann, Cauchy
    ...
    For all of the above: GAUSS, the smartest person to ever live, dwarfing the likes of Newton, von Neumann and Archimedes, in my view and yes all the other ones mentioned were abnormally talented.

  • @alecs8141
    @alecs8141 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really like this man's voice. I could listen to him talk about mathematics for hours and not get bored.

  • @Ringersan2
    @Ringersan2 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:30 A stamp from my non-existing home country, the GDR. :-) I almost felt of my chair laughing.

  • @SamuelEstenlund
    @SamuelEstenlund 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I'm a little sad this video wasn't 2 seconds shorter...

    • @thulyblu5486
      @thulyblu5486 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it could have been 17:17 ... so many missed opportunities

  • @mikerich32
    @mikerich32 9 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I would like to watch this video, but every time I try to watch it, an ad tries to play first, but THE AD NEVER COMES. I'M STUCK HERE WAITING FOR THE AD TO PLAY SO I CAN WATCH THE VIDEO BUT IT NEVER DOES AND I'VE BEEN TRYING FOR FIFTEEN MINUTES NOW AND THE VIDEO SEEMS REALLY INTERESTING AND I WANT TO WATCH IT BUT IT WON'T LET ME!!!1!!1!one1!

    • @Cyberspine
      @Cyberspine 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Psst... google AdBlock

    • @thulyblu5486
      @thulyblu5486 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      ghostery plugin for firefox also does the trick perfectly

    • @mikerich32
      @mikerich32 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i was on my phone lol
      but, i did finally watch it like 5 minutes after i posted that comment haha

  • @Saki630
    @Saki630 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    OMG Brady, this has got to be my favorite video. I liked how much fun he was having. The Eisenbud 17-gon would look great on everyone's walls at home at at work.
    I would like to see more of these int he future, then teach me graph theory.

  • @ronaldlijs
    @ronaldlijs 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic video, nice touch!

  • @tomaspabon2484
    @tomaspabon2484 7 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Dude,this guy is more stoned than I am

  • @DvDick
    @DvDick 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    the "gold and blue star" is albireo

    • @U014B
      @U014B 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought they were the pale ones with pink eyes?

  • @TheNumberScott
    @TheNumberScott 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loved the story at the end about naming the street almost more than the main video!

  • @lukewest
    @lukewest 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a wonderful little story at the end!

  • @stubbydoughnut9100
    @stubbydoughnut9100 9 ปีที่แล้ว +291

    So why exactly is he doing these "by eye"? It's still unclear to me...

    • @vintagestuffguy1998
      @vintagestuffguy1998 9 ปีที่แล้ว +327

      If only the video would explain it several times...

    • @tupples3326
      @tupples3326 9 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      TheVintageStuffGuy1998 I think Niko was sarcastic :P

    • @vintagestuffguy1998
      @vintagestuffguy1998 9 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      ***** So was I! :D

    • @Sp1derFingers
      @Sp1derFingers 9 ปีที่แล้ว +117

      TheVintageStuffGuy1998 some people just can't handle layer 2 sarcasm

    • @vintagestuffguy1998
      @vintagestuffguy1998 9 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Needs to level up... Gain a few more Exp...

  • @quinn7894
    @quinn7894 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Eisenberg 17-gon: the early version of the parker square

  • @fonaimartin98
    @fonaimartin98 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Using the 2/17 of a heptadecagon is also applicable. Going around the circle with it will mark all of our points. (Provable using abstract algebra, unless the numerator and the denominator does not have common divisors.)

  • @triggamusician
    @triggamusician 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing story there at the end! I love it!

  • @givememore4free
    @givememore4free 9 ปีที่แล้ว +138

    This guy should not moonlight in a PIZZA SHOP because it would take him all day to cut a pizza. I think he would have a stroke if I asked him to make 13 slices in the pizza

    • @thulyblu5486
      @thulyblu5486 9 ปีที่แล้ว +83

      I'm trying to imagine cutting pizza with a compass

    • @faokie
      @faokie 9 ปีที่แล้ว +170

      He would just do it by eye.

  • @pythor2
    @pythor2 9 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Why is it impossible to make a 21-gon?

    • @thulyblu5486
      @thulyblu5486 9 ปีที่แล้ว +177

      ... it's already _gon_ before you start... * badumtsh *

    • @gianma93
      @gianma93 9 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      Gon, 21-gons 🎶

    • @robosergTV
      @robosergTV 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      why is 2+2 is NOT 5? Because

    • @TacticusPrime
      @TacticusPrime 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Well, they didn't go into the maths on how Gauss discovered how to produce a 17-gon with just a compass and straight edge. It must be a property of that.

    • @Hecatonicosachoron
      @Hecatonicosachoron 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you use neusis to trisect an angle you can construct the regular icosihenagon (or henkaieicosagon if you want to be very classical) from the regular heptagon.

  • @allenpryortube
    @allenpryortube 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    so glad I stayed for the end. that story was awesome!

  • @iandonaldpaul
    @iandonaldpaul 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a satisfying process to watch!

  • @NickPappas-NP
    @NickPappas-NP 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Shouldn't it be called decaheptagon?
    17 in Greek is decahepta not heptadeca
    (Same for all n-gons with 13

    • @eblackbrook
      @eblackbrook 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      When you say "17 in Greek is decahepta" do you mean modern Greek or Ancient greek? Could it be possible that this changed between the two? (And if so, the why of that would be another interesting story.)

  • @nesultimate3854
    @nesultimate3854 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Anyone else see Pacman getting brain freeze from a little ice cream cone?

  • @mrautistic2580
    @mrautistic2580 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for an excellent video!

  • @Waffle_6
    @Waffle_6 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    that marker Gave me chills throughout the whole episode

  • @NoriMori1992
    @NoriMori1992 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'll call it the Eisengon! :D

  • @SaraBearRawr0312
    @SaraBearRawr0312 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I like him, can we keep him?

  • @mitchumsport
    @mitchumsport 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    not to take away from the beauty of the geometry in this video, but I'd point out that with the magic of editing the Professor doesn't need to 'take our time' to do anything. If some parts of it are tedious to watch but a joy to do, they could simply be excluded or represented by the graphics you use in the video. I'm glad he admits he's a little tired of it towards the end lol.

  • @davezinn6810
    @davezinn6810 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was a wonderful presentation. Thank you very much.

  • @JLConawayII
    @JLConawayII 9 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    I don't like heptadecagons, I think they're pretentious.

    • @thulyblu5486
      @thulyblu5486 9 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Exactly! Hexadecagons are way cooler.

    • @CharlieInDaUK
      @CharlieInDaUK 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Prefer pentadecagoneps

    • @martijnvanloocke3749
      @martijnvanloocke3749 9 ปีที่แล้ว +86

      Never trust a deceptigon

    • @NFITC1
      @NFITC1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +JLConawayII All primes are pretentious.

    • @dougr.2398
      @dougr.2398 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Perhaps the pretension is in your presumption!!

  • @mikeFolco
    @mikeFolco 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Bob Ross of math

  • @dave2.077
    @dave2.077 หลายเดือนก่อน

    im so glad i looked this up again this video is straigt up beautiful

  • @TheCodingDuck
    @TheCodingDuck 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I always loved compass and ruler drawings! It is so pleasing to be able to see the math behind the polygons we draw everyday!

    • @kyanleong8014
      @kyanleong8014 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      “The polygons we draw everydy” do you draw 17-gons every day?

    • @TheCodingDuck
      @TheCodingDuck 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kyanleong8014 Each day in the past six years, I wake up, make some coffee, and draw a 17-gon on paper.

  • @Carmenifold
    @Carmenifold 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This guy's like math Bob Ross

  • @JBroMCMXCI
    @JBroMCMXCI 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    11:24 The Parker Square of heptadecagons

  • @FelixSalazar
    @FelixSalazar 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The story of the end of this video is extremely cool. Thanks Brady.

    • @FelixSalazar
      @FelixSalazar 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      I gotta try this. I feel like a n00b. I only drew a 5-gon and a 7-gon when I was in primary school

  • @vhammer
    @vhammer 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the little story at the end.

  • @KayvanAbbasi
    @KayvanAbbasi 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    6:13 "Professor" is missing an 's'. That does not take anything from the great value of your awesome videos though, which I try to follow every chance that I get. Thank you all for making this beautiful channel.
    Warm regards,
    Kayvan

  • @ffggddss
    @ffggddss 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What a great idea - let's thread a needle wearing oven mitts!

  • @Amateur0Visionary
    @Amateur0Visionary 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He has such a soothing, Bob Ross-like tone. Why weren't my math profs like this gentleman?

  • @jwilbrahamford
    @jwilbrahamford 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    love that anecdote about the naming of the street.

  • @zachrodriguez3667
    @zachrodriguez3667 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That's great but... will it bring Ed and Al's mother back?

    • @marcusb2650
      @marcusb2650 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Everything comes at a cost

  • @archeronskis
    @archeronskis 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I think maybe you need more videos about pi...
    /s

  • @dougr.2398
    @dougr.2398 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    David is the son of my third quantum theory professor, Dr. Leonard Eisenbud, whose Doctoral thesis advisor was Dr. Geno Wigner (at Princeton). Dr. Leonard also was a nature photographer in the Setauket area of New York, and a member of my (very generous) oral examination triumvirate in 1977-78. Dr. L Eisenbud developed the theory of nuclear reaction “channels”, quantum input and output states, with E. Wigner. Dr. Dave was also President of the M.A.A for about a year.

  • @panda4247
    @panda4247 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    11:09 - nice Parker Square move there!

  • @NickAlpha_
    @NickAlpha_ 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    the correct term is dekaheptagon , not heptadekagon ...

    • @raynsajahan7711
      @raynsajahan7711 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      no heptadecagon is correct because deca is for 10 while 7 is hepta so decaheptagon is wrong. it's basically 10 -7 shape

    • @raynsajahan7711
      @raynsajahan7711 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Rayn Sajahan think

    • @NickAlpha_
      @NickAlpha_ 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      For Number 17 , you read first the 10 and then the 7 in greek language . In english , first is the 7 then the 10 and that creates the confusion here . I believe that if you decide to use a greek phrase for your numerology then you have to use it accordingly because otherwise you have stn with no meaning and a grammatical error at the same time .

    • @kunstderfugue
      @kunstderfugue 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Nick Alpha it's dodecagon for twelve (do - two) so i see it only fair that 17-gon is called heptadecagon.

    • @NickAlpha_
      @NickAlpha_ 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Energy Core Yes 12 is dodeka , from dio (2) and deka (10) but for 17 it is dekahepta .
      Go figure ...

  • @teknostatik1055
    @teknostatik1055 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Do five inaccurate steps to save time
    Do the 7th step accurately because it's "very important".

  • @edzizayari6037
    @edzizayari6037 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel so relaxed after watching this, the video has some kind of hypnotic effect or something

  • @guilhermedantas5067
    @guilhermedantas5067 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The story at the end was magical