Is the 707 HP Jeep Trackhawk Faster Than The BMW X6 M? Hot or Not Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 661

  • @TFLcar
    @TFLcar  6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Thanks for watching. Is the new Kia Stinger Hot or Not? You can find out here: th-cam.com/video/jr2s_4Fvf80/w-d-xo.html

    • @ukshanky7012
      @ukshanky7012 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Bmw engines are best

    • @dylan522p
      @dylan522p 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hot

    • @Narinjas
      @Narinjas 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Instead of TrackHog they should name it DragHog.

    • @mongoose406
      @mongoose406 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ukshanky7012 Well then uk Stinky why is the Dodge running a 11.6 1/4 mile and a 3.3 second 0-60. And the BMW engine only does 4 second 0-60 and a 12.4 1/4 mile? I think your stoned today.

  • @chancecervantes51
    @chancecervantes51 6 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    Love the Jeep for the looks and sound

  • @randomthoughts1001
    @randomthoughts1001 6 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    The sound of that Jeep is so good it doesnt matter to me if the Jeeps flipping over.
    🤣

    • @savagetuner2404
      @savagetuner2404 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Random Thoughts they don’t, it’s got traction control like hell. It should flip but it doesn’t.

    • @ErectkyleDysfunction
      @ErectkyleDysfunction 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      LMAOO its a jeep thing ⚡

  • @kennethburrell4631
    @kennethburrell4631 6 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    The dude driving these vehicles is obviously a BMW fan.

  • @aadlen
    @aadlen 6 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    I really appreciate Paul's honestey with his on track review.

    • @chudifrank6493
      @chudifrank6493 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Andrew Adlen I know! Other reviewers tend to favor American cars.

  • @alexanderpeter219
    @alexanderpeter219 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    The launch control was not set higher on the track hawk because you are able to adjust that to make faster

  • @denisleblanc4506
    @denisleblanc4506 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    0.69 seconds slower around the track than the Challenger Hellcat! How in the world can the Trackhawk not be HOT? Look at the cars it did beat. I know the Hellcat isn't the best track car but still this is quite a monster.

  • @mikemiller9124
    @mikemiller9124 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just curious why the BMW was not in M mode clearly you could tell with the heads up display. Normally in M mode it would have RPM only heads up display like every other M car. It was just showing basic MPH.

  • @ednobre
    @ednobre 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I think it would have been more fair if it went against the X5M instead. It’s a bigger vehicle more like the size of the Jeep.

    • @Olof123
      @Olof123 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Actually the X6M is an inch longer than the X5M... pretty identical in weight too...

    • @bigbossman5969
      @bigbossman5969 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      exactly u race a car against a suv what did they think would happen.

    • @prouxvb9835
      @prouxvb9835 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The X6M is faster tho

    • @King_drew
      @King_drew 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@prouxvb9835 It needs the TT to even be in the convo with the trackhawk

  • @HoosierDaddy_
    @HoosierDaddy_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    I never imagined that suvs would be going 0-60 in under 4 seconds.

    • @aquakingman
      @aquakingman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Brad Conklin I can imagine it costing more than a small house though...

    • @HoosierDaddy_
      @HoosierDaddy_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      aquakingman + no kidding!

    • @hoagietray
      @hoagietray 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brad Conklin i

    • @GordonStudent
      @GordonStudent 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Watch a few of my videos lol you may be surprised

    • @dontrustwhiteyevery1
      @dontrustwhiteyevery1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Meanwhile...1995 boosted civics runnin 900+ hp for much LESS!

  • @spikegooddog
    @spikegooddog 5 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I would rather have the trackhawk. It didnt seem like he was trying as hard with the track hawk as he was with the BMW.😂

    • @yaboyfranke9370
      @yaboyfranke9370 ปีที่แล้ว

      Trackhawk can’t take them corners

  • @thedolenorway
    @thedolenorway 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Trackhawk is still pretty high on my dream car list, and here in Norway most people would have no idea that it is a beast so it would almost be a sleeper. Would love to surprise some Porsche Cayenne owners with this monster!

  • @MrRdb1963
    @MrRdb1963 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow, is it nice to see a performance SUV that is not another boring box shape, bravo BMW.

  • @viper8444
    @viper8444 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I can tell you from experience that he did not even try to get the most out of that jeep. a simple change in the launch rpm setting to optimize for traction and dial to sport mode and he would have run mid to low 3sec 0-60. The BMW is also an awesome machine

  • @bananarepublic8985
    @bananarepublic8985 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Trackhawk is a muscle car, it's got "track" in its name but that does not mean you can take it on the track. M cars are typically built for track and back roads despite that X6M is a huge SUV. If you love drag racing, pick the Jeep, if you want driving pleasure, you cannot go wrong with the M cars
    Edit: Did I see the new M5 in the background?

    • @TheCookiezilla
      @TheCookiezilla 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Banana Republic lmao the x6m is not a huge suv it quite small

  • @savedbydave
    @savedbydave 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Paul smiled during that Trackhawk 0-60 run.... and that is what the trackhawk is all about!

  • @Robwilli
    @Robwilli 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm sorry but you guys are wrong. I'm a BMW fan and I currently own BMW.
    But it has been proven by many and I say many people, these cars performances. By professional drivers too.
    The trackhawk without a doubt is faster in acceleration than the X6M and that altitude comment is not true.
    The trackhawk has been tested in road courses and really delivers. So not one bit I believe you guys that the X6M is faster in acceleration and in a road course lap. Sorry...
    I love BMW but give credit where is due, that Trackhawk is slightly better in performance than the BMW.
    Now in luxury and quality I would definitely give it to BMW without hesitation, no comparison on that.

    • @GrillerRohde
      @GrillerRohde 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I think this test from the guys is just useless.

  • @yourtube7666
    @yourtube7666 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    2015 BMW X6M vs 2018 Grand Cherokee Trackhawk
    There is something to look forward to!

  • @sollom1
    @sollom1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    The fact he wears helment in the jeep just makes me die from laughing

    • @savagetuner2404
      @savagetuner2404 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      sollom1 you need it. Not because the Jeep isn’t safe. Because people aren’t. 😏

  • @offroad5798
    @offroad5798 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'd way rather have the Trackhawk. What an amazing machine

  • @markhoffman4587
    @markhoffman4587 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Was the Jeep in full " Track Mode " ? I'm asking because it didn't behave as if it was, and I'm someone who spend a lot of time in this vehicle, at the limit, during its development phase. Thanks

  • @berowawa3907
    @berowawa3907 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I dont like Paul.

  • @CoolGuy-ux5wx
    @CoolGuy-ux5wx 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It’s amazing on how these high performance cars perform!😱😱😱

  • @sickjohnson
    @sickjohnson 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Is this really a fair test with a SUV vs. a cross over?

    • @sickjohnson
      @sickjohnson 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Totally!

    • @kclark8080
      @kclark8080 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm sure they have to test what they can get their hands on.

  • @brbhave2p00p4
    @brbhave2p00p4 6 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    German engineering at its finest

    • @Taradash4L
      @Taradash4L 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      CareerFireman Not really , they cost same , the trackhawk is just an typical american overpriced junk boat made with an cheap crap design and engine from old trucks.

    • @NutButDontTella
      @NutButDontTella 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      CareerFireman Only poor people complain about the price. I see all kinds of excuses coming from dodge cry babies lmao "If my car weighed less" "Forced induction Altitude advantage" you pay more for the precision, quality, dynamics and luxury and it obviously shows in the video. At least with BMW you won't go to a shop in the first 300 miles like WillMotivation did with his brand new hellcat, talk about quality smh

    • @NutButDontTella
      @NutButDontTella 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      CareerFireman Less value? The Z8 is almost 20 years old and it went up in value over 300K lmao what dodge ever kept its value? It obviously shows that BMW doesn't need the extra horses cause it raped the trackhawk what a piece of shit. Pales in comparison? Did you forget BMW owns rolls Royce? What a wannabe car enthusiast with a bad case of headassery lmao smh scrub

    • @NutButDontTella
      @NutButDontTella 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      CareerFireman Btw BMW covers bumper to bumper under the hood for free 😂 obviously shows you know nothing of upper echelon brands. I wonder how embarrassing your face would be to say you paid 100K for a jeep. Talk about a fiat piece of shit

    • @ernestoartalejo6478
      @ernestoartalejo6478 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sad but American cars will never be as good as German cars

  • @V8Supercar1
    @V8Supercar1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Not bad for the Jeep. Considering that its an actual real suv where as the x6 m is just a sedan sitting on a suv suspension.

    • @whereto7381
      @whereto7381 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      BMW is far more capable off-road than a Jeep, showroom to showroom. Jeeps are a last place unreliable piece of garbage, known for nothing but bad crash test and breaking down. Jeep is a simple welfare SUV.

    • @daxman2617
      @daxman2617 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      BMW's reliable sureee

    • @krane15
      @krane15 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good call. One is an HP SUV while the other is just a tall sedan.

  • @agreen.
    @agreen. 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why Paul puts his helmet on in Trackhawk lap time and X6 no helmet?

  • @williamwilson5125
    @williamwilson5125 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I appreciate a real comparison by a professional driver proving that hp alone doesnt make a car great. The Bmw X6M is a 150hp less and is quicker, handles better and built better.

  • @TruthandJustice4166
    @TruthandJustice4166 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I own a SRT jeep but I want a trackhawk it's a man's car!!

  • @kris.monroe
    @kris.monroe 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I actually kind of love how it sounds.

  • @suhailchothia5139
    @suhailchothia5139 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bmw on the track a killer. Jeep also a lovely vehicle. Choices hard to make up my mind.

  • @ubaldocastillo2224
    @ubaldocastillo2224 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This man has some serious balls to drive this heavy cars this hard on a track

  • @venom5809
    @venom5809 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Paul and I own the same watch, he's obviously a man of good taste.

    • @chronodriver
      @chronodriver 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've had it for 20 years :)

  • @patrickjustus
    @patrickjustus 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Overall the bmw x5m and x6m is a better buy since you can snag either for under 40k, some under 30k! Thats 555hp awd that you can easily tune to 650+ for less then 2k! The only jeep worth spending over 50k on is a new top of the line eco diesel wrangler coming out soon. You will see the trackhawks used in the 50's in 2 years just like the hellcats that are now in the mid 40's.

  • @CALLWILLIE100
    @CALLWILLIE100 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    can you try this on a real track not a go kart track that jeep will kill that bmw

  • @01gtbdaily30
    @01gtbdaily30 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    BMW is just far ahead in balance and turns.

  • @mikealanzo
    @mikealanzo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Anyone thinking Trackhawk is slow at 5200+ altitude can smootch my rear end!!! Anybody who's somebody knows that SC are worthless at high altitude while turbos are not affected as much. Bring it down to sea level and we'll see what's what! And also, that X6 wheights 4750lbs (2150KG) VS 5400lbs (2450KG), that's 650lbs (300KG) difference in advantage for the bimmer! One more thing, that Jeep is a proper family SUV, while that bimmer is just for looks and design while the rear space sucks balls, not to mention the trunk space.... pppfffttt......

  • @alonsoharos5295
    @alonsoharos5295 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is that a suv or just a stretched BMW

  • @stefannielsen9244
    @stefannielsen9244 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    X6M 👑💪❤

  • @pattycarljackson
    @pattycarljackson 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The BMW is a luxury suv the track hawk is a muscle SUV.

  • @makker0082
    @makker0082 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really, really, too bad the Alfa Romeo Stelvio was not there to compete. At the Nürburgring it still holds the world record for SUV's. Not the BMW, not the Porsche, but the Stelvio.... Would love to see that fight !! Great video guys, thank you.

  • @MeatMan61
    @MeatMan61 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ill take the jeep over that bubble #makeedgescoolagain

  • @Nerew
    @Nerew 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In these comparisons involving the crazy fast suvs (mainly in the upper-midsize section), I don’t understand why the x6m is used instead of the x5m. The x5m is more of the suv and is more comparable in its overall structural/body design.

  • @efs83dws
    @efs83dws 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That front left tire on the Jeep left the ground on that first corner when Paul drove it around the track.

  • @mboiko
    @mboiko 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Enjoyed the video but even if I had the money...I think I would pass on both.

  • @-beastbryce-6273
    @-beastbryce-6273 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That sounds really nice!

  • @martingunawan1590
    @martingunawan1590 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    2018 Jeep Trackhawk 6.2 V8 produce 707 hp 645 lbft. 2015 BMW X6M 4.4 V8 produce 567 hp 553 lbft. Trackhawk suppose better than X6M in drag race, but the issue is transmission or clutch.

    • @mrkruger5108
      @mrkruger5108 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Martin Gunawan uhm it's actually because they are at high altitude.

  • @siricharle8596
    @siricharle8596 6 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    I like Jeep trackhawk...

    • @richg9627
      @richg9627 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      CareerFireman you just can't take the lose can you. Also you twist facts. They should of compared the X5M against the Trackhawk. A loaded Trackhawk costs $100K and base BMW X5M cost $100K. For $700 you can add a racechip to the X5M and get the HP up to 720+ on it. Face it BMW is a much better value, but you're a Jeep fan boy and will support it no matter what and view everything else as garbage even if priced the same. The Jeep has a piss poor interior for a $100K. Also in 2020 the new X5M and X6M come out be out with even more power and better tech.

    • @richg9627
      @richg9627 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      CareerFireman excuse me you but who buys a base Trackhawk? Also you are unlikely to get one for $85K like you seem to think. Which is actually $87K before tax now. You'd have to order one direct from a dealership like that which they also might be unwilling to do as they are only slotted a limited amount and would rather sell them at a higher price. You seem to think like someone who is in the market for a 95k to 100k realistic priced Trackhawk will see a $105k base X6M ($115k with a few added options) or $100k base X5M ($110k with a few added options) and a say shit that's over priced I can't afford that. The way you compare price at this price leave speaks volumes for your lack of understanding of a car buyer at that price level. Yes if someone is working a shit job wants to pay all cash and saving every penny one will save up $95k for a Trackhawk before $105k for a X6M. But for someone who makes a lot of money and is leasing say the car. Monthly payments may even be equal as BMW gives great residuals. Side note BMW also under rates there cars as the Dinan website shows a stock one dyno's at 643hp at 5500 rpm. Also with turbos you can get a lot more additional power out of them with just a piggyback tune vs a supercharger. Yes you can tune a Trackhawk, but a tune alone will add very little gains to it. You need to change engine internals for any real gain on this engine. Otherwise you're just making a very expensive grenade. Not showing any understanding of that speaks volumes for what it lacks now. Also, smart ass BMW is already testing the new X5M/X6M as reports have shown and it will be based on the S63B44T4 engine that's in the new M5, but have even more power. I doubt you can afford a Trackhawk or you wouldn't be bitching a X6M is overpriced. I don't think you even really know cars otherwise you would some understanding of brands you don't even like. I know a lot about Jeep. I've owned a 2008 and 2016 Jeep SRT8 among currently owning a X5M. Everything about them is a night and day difference. Trackhawk which I've looked at, but not test driven is not any better in the interior quality or design. You are just a Jeep/Dodge fanboy who can't even afford the top of the food chain in the brand you jerk off too. Get you're act together dude ...

    • @Gichie79
      @Gichie79 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@freEvo8 X5M is currently discounted so your argument is mute and like I said earlier the X6M shouldn't be compared to it since it's not the same type of body class. You got the discount on the Jeep since no one wants a $100k Jeep. It's like buying a $300K Lexus sports car over a Lambo. I don't care how wonderful the Trackhawk is I've owned an SRT 8 and the fit and finish and interior are nowhere near the quality of BMW. Regardless I now care more about luxury and speed with some practicality that's why I got a M5 Competition . It blows the doors off any SUV and pretty much everything else.

  • @moniooryan9055
    @moniooryan9055 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey the bmw 2015 and jeep 2018

  • @joeuv
    @joeuv 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Engines are machines. From time to time parts wear out and need replacing.Some engines are turbo charged.Do the parts in a turbo charged engine wear out more quickly than in a standard engine - given that all the other variables are the same?

  • @gunfumaster1024
    @gunfumaster1024 6 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    Am I the only one that thinks that BMW is a really ugly car?

    • @topsecretmx5142
      @topsecretmx5142 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Not at all it’s hideous

    • @ulverop
      @ulverop 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No.

    • @antoniodosreisfeitosaneto7553
      @antoniodosreisfeitosaneto7553 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No. Count me in for that. It is ugly

    • @usernamealreadytaken770
      @usernamealreadytaken770 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nope. I have a BMW, but I don’t the X6 (X4, and X2 as well). More expensive and less storage space. Rather have the X5.

    • @themadmachinist8637
      @themadmachinist8637 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In pictures it just looks like a sedan.

  • @howtomillennial6781
    @howtomillennial6781 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why the hell would you test times in COLORADO? -_-

  • @millenniumzeek
    @millenniumzeek 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So these FI engines do not compensate for altitude? I thought they boost more

  • @MichaelBacon212
    @MichaelBacon212 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I personally love the Jeep Cherokee Trackhawk. I hope they continue to produce them so in about 2 years I can buy one new. I'm planning on buying a Hellcat by the end of summer. Not sure if I'll get a Charger or a Challenger yet. I love them both.

    • @jasonsingh7456
      @jasonsingh7456 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Michael Bacon love my charger Hellcat

    • @patrickjustus
      @patrickjustus 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Michael Bacon wait a bit longer since prices are still coming down on them with the arrival of the demon. Oh and get a charger since they have better resale and harder to find. You can find them used now with low miles under 50k! Oh and if you want an even better deal then snag a newer srt8 and just slap a procharger on it and boom you have hellcat power for around 40k. Or snag a police edition charger rt with awd and procharge that and have a 650hp awd monster with traction that with destroy a hellcat and for under 40k.

    • @millenniumzeek
      @millenniumzeek 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Michael Bacon do you realize how crappy the track hawk, charger and Challenger are? Utter garbage and will be worth scrap in a decade.

    • @jrodzilla24
      @jrodzilla24 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Jeep is a beast .

    • @mikea.7370
      @mikea.7370 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Aret Han Z. That I agree with. Crap cars with blowers

  • @andrewspaltman
    @andrewspaltman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The difference between the 2 became obvious when you didn't feel the need to wear a helmet in the BMW.
    I own a X5 & X3 as well as Voyager 2.8 CRD and a Jeep cherokee CRD and while I love them all , the Beemer will always be more refined.

  • @michaelscott7706
    @michaelscott7706 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Should have been X5M vs Trackhawk. The grand Cherokee is not a humpback sub like the GLE and X6. The X5M would have been a better test.

  • @Nestle245
    @Nestle245 6 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    So Paul basically said the Track hawk is pointless.

    • @Toyota4Life
      @Toyota4Life 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He said both are pointless because of their size and weight they would never drive as good as the lower lighter car on a track he is right they are better for the street

    • @peterparker9444
      @peterparker9444 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If the Trackhawk puts a smile on your face and you can afford one without breaking the bank the do what makes you happy! Even the wife would be happy to drive it!

  • @Mark-oh3dp
    @Mark-oh3dp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Both of you are crazy!! The Trackhawk is Hotter than HOT 🔥🔥🔥

  • @JijiVS
    @JijiVS 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Thats a lot performance for money, Jeep 👍👍👍

    • @stefanfreestylez
      @stefanfreestylez 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jiji VS its 100k so its really not tho...

    • @savagetuner2404
      @savagetuner2404 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Stefan Cupovic lol ok fanboy. Keep buying bimmers.

  • @hoagietray
    @hoagietray 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Actual trackhawk owners are turning 11.2@120 with their trucks, today, at drag strips, with videos. 100% oem stock down to all season tires. There is not one stock x5/X6 M that comes close to that. Period. End of story. Stop the debate as to what truck is faster in a straight line right now. Heck, I don't believe I've seen a modified x5/x6 M run a low 11, but I could be wrong. Btw, I'm a trackhawk owner that ran an 11.2@120 today, and I've only been to track twice with it. How long has the X5/X6 been out? ...lol ThawkMike on IG if you want see vids and slip.

  • @illumination357
    @illumination357 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I figured they would say the bimmer was "faster". Smdh
    I've seen both in action and I can tell you first hand that trackhawk will kill that bmw!

    • @slowschoolofdriving218
      @slowschoolofdriving218 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A God in training now spend $300 on the bmw for a jb4 tune and I wanna see the outcome

    • @WindyCity1992
      @WindyCity1992 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      A God in training
      Exactly i hate fake car guys.
      The Hawk ran low 11s already

    • @mikedoyon2354
      @mikedoyon2354 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A God in training negative. I own a x6m and would bet my ride on the trailhawk junk
      BMW is up with Mercedes and Porsche and such jeep isint even same ballpark

    • @WindyCity1992
      @WindyCity1992 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mike Doyon
      Yep. All 3 are unreliable trash for
      Social status repressed people
      Who are desperate for acceptance
      The recalls dont lie. Keep it up tho

    • @mikedoyon2354
      @mikedoyon2354 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Plum_Crazy 1992 never had issues with mine owned 3 years now. I smile while i drive anytime i want ;)

  • @Adam-xg2bi
    @Adam-xg2bi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Ok, i've got a few question..
    How is it possible that the same car (bmw x6 m - but older now) is magically faster in 0-60mph (0,4sec) and lap time 5 seconds faster then previous?? - Your own test with same car, same place, 3 years ago..
    th-cam.com/video/Qp0kIomIpCc/w-d-xo.html
    And i don't even mention about much slower jeep 0-60 mph than usual.. (normal time is 3,7 sec - a mile above the sea is not an explanation).

  • @mattdavies3023
    @mattdavies3023 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does it compare to the RR Sport SVR?

  • @OBC-radio
    @OBC-radio 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sometimes I think I’m watching TFLjeep...

  • @jakeplaysgaming3315
    @jakeplaysgaming3315 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this guy does not know how to drive
    on a real track that trackhawk will absolutely demolish that bmw

  • @srtjesseb2837
    @srtjesseb2837 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Paul should stick to testing minivans & kias!

  • @daryljohnson7965
    @daryljohnson7965 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    X6M GETS MY VOTE SORRY 91K FOR A JEEP NO THANKS...

  • @Jandejongjong
    @Jandejongjong 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    X6 m got 550hp
    Why compare it with 700hp?
    Not fair;)

    • @savagetuner2404
      @savagetuner2404 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Dra Dikketrip because that’s the best bmw has to offer lol.

    • @eumenidest3519
      @eumenidest3519 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@savagetuner2404 no it's not the new bmw xm6 has way more power then that and it murder the jeep fact

    • @savagetuner2404
      @savagetuner2404 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eumenidest3519 lol you're clueless. The jeep trackhawk has 100hp more.
      www.google.com/search?rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS927US927&sxsrf=ALeKk00pEZGCFxmyA54n8PKf5QIPboJY_w%3A1610989923272&ei=Y8EFYMj6D4ew5NoP5eWJ4AM&q=2021+x6m+horsepower&oq=2021+X6M+ho&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAxgAMgoIABDJAxBGEPsBMgYIABAWEB46BAgAEEc6BQgAEMkDOgIIADoCCC5QvwhYpw1gzxZoAHACeACAAVaIAfkBkgEBM5gBAKABAaoBB2d3cy13aXrIAQjAAQE&sclient=psy-ab
      you're a clown lol

  • @chaynestheman
    @chaynestheman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Makes sense as to why The Stig was paid to be quiet. 💁‍♂️🤷‍♂️

    • @chronodriver
      @chronodriver 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      a lot of people would agree with that...lol

    • @aimpointrod
      @aimpointrod 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL

  • @JohannGambolputty22
    @JohannGambolputty22 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    “What a bad idea it is to make a high center of gravity a high performance vehicle” -Some short TH-cam nobody

  • @amjadhoujairy9603
    @amjadhoujairy9603 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Trackhawk

  • @matty1053
    @matty1053 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'd take the X6M just my 2 cents.

  • @kingpanther9198
    @kingpanther9198 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I’ll take the hellhawk then the BMW. Hellhawk faster, about 21k cheaper and cheaper to fix. I prefer drag racing then track racing.

  • @Danielpeter2344
    @Danielpeter2344 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, until Roman mentioned it, I had totally forgotten American Top Gear existed. Even since the Grand Tour started, I haven't given Top Gear in general much thought.

  • @blackericdenice
    @blackericdenice 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    People say Dodge went with the sc because they are quicker than turbo. BS, Dodge used sc because it cost less.

    • @themadmachinist8637
      @themadmachinist8637 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      no it doesn't lol. At least not in the aftermarket. A twin turbo set up can be had for a couple grand. A good super charger is 6 to 8k

    • @TsukuyomiPlayz
      @TsukuyomiPlayz 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Stupid comment, they all have they're pros and cons and some are more expensive than other. I guess Audi, Mercedes and jaguar is cheap too

    • @kclark8080
      @kclark8080 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      actually, I think that Chrysler does not do a good job with reliability on turbos in general. So Supercharger is the safe bet.

    • @blackericdenice
      @blackericdenice 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ever hear of Vortec?

    • @blackericdenice
      @blackericdenice 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Audi and Jaguar are cheaper than Mercedes. Name a new Mercedes with a SC.

  • @MountainMasella
    @MountainMasella 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey it's Lefthand at Olde Stage!

  • @ianclaudio777
    @ianclaudio777 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    X6: beautiful, safe, classy, elegant.
    Cherokee: powerfull, but the handling....

  • @beaudaniel1370
    @beaudaniel1370 6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    really? not what it's for? it's called the TRACK hawk and it doesn't do well on the track..................sorry but it's not called the drag hawk which would be way more fitting.

    • @vincentp4951
      @vincentp4951 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Beau Daniel you do know a drag strip is a race TRACK

    • @beaudaniel1370
      @beaudaniel1370 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      oh yeah? I hear people all the time say meet me at the Drag track......wait no they don't. and when I ask people what their favorite racecar is people show me pictures of funny cars and Toyota's with a 1000hp......oh wait no they don't. because actual race cars can oh whats the word oh yeah TURN

    • @williamwilson5125
      @williamwilson5125 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂😂😂great comment! I couldn't of said it better

    • @Shrapnel-qy4xi
      @Shrapnel-qy4xi 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Beau Daniel
      Hellhawk

    • @CALLWILLIE100
      @CALLWILLIE100 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thats not a real race track its a go kart track

  • @sergeyakinin997
    @sergeyakinin997 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The acceleration test went as expected at altitude... supercharged engines do about as well as NA. Turbos are where it's at if you want to keep the power level so high up. Also those BMWs are very underrated to begin with.
    The track test was very interesting though. The X6 did better than expected - I guess BMW put more money into the suspension and those Michelins helped as well. Wonder if better tires and a 1" drop will change the Jeep for the better... although nobody's buying both of those cars to take them to the track, so it's kind of pointless.

  • @RalHellcat
    @RalHellcat 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Luke Warn Roman? The TRACKHAWK is Super HOT 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @jag7371
    @jag7371 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Just remember, the Trackhawk has 5 less torque than the Hellcat.
    Edit: 'it" was changed to Trackhawk

    • @jag7371
      @jag7371 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      True Religion, what? The hellcats?

  • @GodKing804
    @GodKing804 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would get the BMW. That interior (and exterior of course) is such a beautiful place to be. So Germanic.

  • @Shorts_That_I_Like
    @Shorts_That_I_Like 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gotta love the helmet in the Jeep ( must be such a safe car ) haha

  • @nemis1320
    @nemis1320 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I think the Jeep did very good against a car truck bmw the Jeep is a real suv an it kick ass hahaa mopar 4life

    • @whereto7381
      @whereto7381 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jeep cannot go offroad dipshit, research. They all fall apart.

    • @krane15
      @krane15 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Considering its clunky SUV heritage and the fact that it managed to come that close to a German engineered car is remarkable.

  • @rm5238
    @rm5238 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Paul is awesome. Great review minus Roman.

  • @BigRedtheGinger
    @BigRedtheGinger 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    As a Jeep fan, I think the Track Hawk is more of a gimmick than anything. With that said, I would own one if I had the money. Fuel economy isn't too far off my current 97 Grand Cherokee. Not to sound like a total fan boy, but I think the altitude played a roll in the straight line performance. Cheers to the BMW for performing better this time around.

  • @firefreezer123
    @firefreezer123 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So why didn't we do a 1/4 mile drag race between them again?

  • @kevinhoule6547
    @kevinhoule6547 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The exhaust on the Trackhawk - i peed a little.

  • @Ericinferno14
    @Ericinferno14 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hot or not Buick Regal GS?

  • @abc123fhdi
    @abc123fhdi 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The BMWs do well because the DME (ECU) adjust the turbo for altitude providing more boost so 0-60 is the same as sea level on every BMW tested on this channel while other manufacturer's cars are much slower. This is why piggy back tunes on BMWs can translate into substantial gains of 100 horsepower or more at sea level by tricking the computer into thinking it is at high altitude by sending low air pressure values. Would be interesting to see how well these piggy back tunes do compared to sea level over stock tune. The Jeep product might also be slower because with a supercharger you can't really vary the boost that much when air pressure is lower.

  • @mikea.7370
    @mikea.7370 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ok for starters I had no idea the x6m was that damn fast. Secondly, I think the trackhawk is badass no matter what anyone says because that is one insanely fast brick. But it's also a dodge and I would never pay 100k for one of those. Great video guys as always!

  • @krane15
    @krane15 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    To be fair we're comparing a true to a tall sedan. Despite it height, weight, and girth, it still manged to stay in the race. Quite the accomplishment if you ask me. As for Paul he sounds like a traditionalist that eschews moving forward. There's no rule that says owning an SUV has to be dull. I also think he might be a little jelly that the gap between the sports car and a big SUV is a lot less today than it used to be. Try explaining that one to the missus.

  • @rootsmanuva82
    @rootsmanuva82 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm kinda surprised the X6M was quicker around the track. Then again, I'm not. X6M is based on the 5 Series (M5/M6 to be more specific) and the Trackhawk is based on a Grand Cherokee (duh). But I thought the Trackhawk could make up for it with an extra 140 hp. Probably closer to 100 hp since BMW underrates their engines. But still.

  • @clevelandaeromotive
    @clevelandaeromotive 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Here’s why I would never spend that much money on a Jeep.... It’s not a BMW.

  • @rogerp841
    @rogerp841 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about the gt500??

  • @ralphsmallblock4367
    @ralphsmallblock4367 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder why no tests between the Jeep track hawk vs the Alfa Romeo quadrofolio that would be interesting same company?

  • @sweiboi
    @sweiboi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    13 MPG Combined Is Really Bad But When You Have Alot Of Money That You Want To Spend , Buy A TrackHawk xD

    • @themadmachinist8637
      @themadmachinist8637 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      707 hp takes a lot of fuel. Its actually not that bad. Old pickup trucks did about the same with only 200 hp

  • @Blankadoodledo
    @Blankadoodledo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    X6m any day!!!

    • @rickslick730
      @rickslick730 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      LeilaMurka Yup

    • @bobquattrini1787
      @bobquattrini1787 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Until resale time.Hahaha.Bmw will probably cost 30k in 5 yrs.

    • @joegladue8339
      @joegladue8339 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      LeilaMurka lmfao never

    • @carljr.99
      @carljr.99 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      BMW = (Big Money Wasted)

    • @nailbertan1620
      @nailbertan1620 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      LeilaMurka, MB GLE63s AMG 4matic coupe anyday over both of them!!

  • @bryan4467
    @bryan4467 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You guys should of compare the x5m instead of the x6m , x6m is about 50k more expensive

  • @Nrvct
    @Nrvct 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    X6 m for me i don’t really care about Jeep.