why the hell do claas insist on using the oval track design. its crap, if it gets stuck deep mud gets over the top of the track making it harder to get unstuck, shorter track length means it warms faster, less height for getting over obstacles and because of the sharper bend that the track has to go round the drive wheel i think it will warm up faster. where is the advantage over say the case/new holland half track tractors
ok explain why??? i see no advantages apart from its more compact so it makes room for things above it but other than that there aren't many advantages of it over the triangle ore raised front triangle design
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 91 | คู่เอก "คมอาวุธ vs อเล็กเซย์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/V0RkEfYFsgM/mqdefault.jpg)
qoyil qolish kerak gap yo‘q
Claasdan exkovator ishlab chiqarishini kutyapmiz? zo‘r bo‘ladi menimcha
To bych si přál mít doma v garáži.
Stldigan narhni aytinglar
why the hell do claas insist on using the oval track design. its crap, if it gets stuck deep mud gets over the top of the track making it harder to get unstuck, shorter track length means it warms faster, less height for getting over obstacles and because of the sharper bend that the track has to go round the drive wheel i think it will warm up faster. where is the advantage over say the case/new holland half track tractors
Oval track design is not worse that triangle.
ok explain why??? i see no advantages apart from its more compact so it makes room for things above it but other than that there aren't many advantages of it over the triangle ore raised front triangle design