If Nader can’t even understand what he is reading out loud then why on earth is he even in office? Why are so many mentally deficient people in office. This is just so they can be coached “controlled”. Get them out of office!!!!!
Why the Hell are taxpayers providing massive salaries and benefits to people like Joe Biden, Janet Yellen, Jerry Nadler, John Fetterman, Diane Feinstein, Maxine Watters, Karine Jean-Pierre, etc. etc. who are completely unable to perform even a portion of their jobs without instructions in an earpiece, prepared material on a teleprompter, reading from a voluminous binder, carrying a cheat sheet and providing answers to Congress only after being fed notes by some research drone?
@@somedude9366 You are generalizing. I grew up in Miami around many Jewish people. Some made fools of themselves, some did not. People are people and their character has everything to do with upbringing. And I’m not Jewish.
Nadler is so ignorant of the function of the magazines for firearms. Magazines are preloaded by the owner so that changing magazines takes only a second or two. There is practically no difference in firing time between having 2 magazines and having 1 magazine that has the same capacity as 2.
These radicals, such as Nadler, have to get their information and answers approved and handed to them by their handlers!! They are all just puppets doing someones else's bidding, and for what? The power? The money? Remember, follow the money!! How are these people becoming multi- millionaires on a Government salary?
Nadler sits there and reads the rule as per the Web sight, and still does not get that you can not under any circumstance own the brace. The web sight said that you have to remove it and make it unable to be used again. And it went right over his head.
That's what got me. He literally read the rule out loud, including the part that literally said "permanently alter or dispose". Not even a minute later, he says "correct" when Massie is quoting Dettleboch being entirely incorrect with his testimony. He literally has no logic skills, and is just a puppet of his staff coaching him from behind. This is the state of the modern democrat party, none of their politicians have a clue what they are talking about and are just pushing the party line being told to them by their staff.
He’s 76 years old. You can’t expect someone of that age to have strong reading comprehension or critical thinking abilities. Like so many of the other career politicians, they’re barely fit to be a store greeter. The military requires retirement at 62 (with some exceptions). If we aren’t going to have term limits, then at least have an age cut off.
And so it should be. However, these 'rules' and 'regulations' carry the penalty of law bypassing Congress. While I do not believe all of these bureaucratic agencies should be fully dismantled, I am a firm believer that they MUST be disempowered to enact rules with the power of law. I also believe a review of all rules and regulations imposed by these agencies is in order to discern Constitutional legality. While we are on the subject, States that impose laws that are in conflict with the Constitution need to be properly reprimanded and/or fined (ALL federal funding withheld) until the law complies with the Constitution of the United States or is abolished. I'm sure there are better ways to handle all of this. These are just generalized ideas. ---Just my two cents.
Saying, "period" doesn't make you right or make things a fact. Congress has been giving away their power for a long time via allowing agencies to create regulations. Oh, wait. I forgot to sound serious, PERIOD!
@@deeannray5093 I want you to consider the possibility of something far worse being installed to place these agencies. Consider there are real investigations going on that are after really bad guys but under your idealism, that would end and they all go free. Removing their unconstitutional power is a far better option overall. Any entity that can create the very laws they enforce without oversight is just asking for corruption. Congress failed us in that respect. They gave away their power for an easier life and now suffer that decision. ---Just my two cents.
Why is Nadler so proud of being ignorant of the rules and laws that they are talking about? He has been a Representative for THIRTY YEARS. How does he not know what the penalties of violating federal NFA regulations are? How is he literally sitting there and making a point to show that he doesn't even know what the pistol brace rule says? Massie is RIGHT. The rule punishes POSSESSION of a pistol brace + pistol. Hence, it says to register or DESTROY the brace...... He is sitting here and showing that he can't even bother to inform himself of basic facts before trying to debate someone. Massie going to Cline for the answer was golden, since it points out how obvious it is that one side of the debate actually cares while the other is just trying to push gun control for gun control's sake.
For every crime, there are at least 200 criminals. Justice is not blind plea deals do exist. And some of those criminals are protected under their own law.
I'm still trying to get a grasp of that. Maybe he cannot actually visualize what is being discussed here. He just looks like a dope every appearance now.
There is no “shoulder brace” its called a “Butt Stock … The ATF ALSO SAID that shouldering a pistol brace would NOT MAKE IT ILLEGAL to be used in that manner….
Nailer is totally delusional. A mass shooter is not going to care in the least if he/she attaches a brace or not. They will be going to jail for life anyway .
Wadle was under the impression there are 2 functionally different designs of the brace. Massie seem to imply there is not 2 designs without actually asserting it. Massie could have ended the confusion by asserting (not imply) there is one design of the brace not 2 if indeed there is just the one (forearm) design.
“I don’t like people legally owning guns therefore i will lie endlessly to people much more knowledgeable than I am on the topic. Just like I lied to my constituents on ANTIFA ‘ not being real’ .” Thomas Massie is a very intelligent man who is just too intelligent for Nadler. Nadler, the adults in the room are talking now.
Massie is a RINO. One of 20 republicans who voted not to charge Schiff for his lies about Russiagate....snake in the grass...very very dangerous and bad for us all. Unpredictable and loyal to his kind. Disgusting
He’s the worst, I mean, I think him, Bush and AOC, are up there too, oh wait, dude that slept w/ the spy, his name slip my mind, but he’s the horrible too. 🤦♀️ awe man, also the ranking member that sits next to Jim Jordan, the black lady, can’t stand all of them. Every time I’m about to listen to them, I literally, cringe. That’s how horrible they are.
And neither one of these men understand that it's not the government that gives us permission. It's us that gives the government permission. Only problem is people let the government think its the other way around
Ok, if the states can make laws that override the federal government, then states should be able to legalize owning silencers without requiring federal paperwork. Nadler is doing his best do deflect and he's stuttering because he knows he's defending something unconstitutional.
States are permitted to write more restrictive laws even laws that violate the US Constitution. Those laws only get struck down after someone is injured by the law and they sue/appeal to potentially the US supreme court.
There is nothing that prohibits a state from passing a law saying suppressors or fully automatic rifles or anything weapons related is legal. You can then have a suppressor in that state and you will not be arrested by state authorities or prosecuted in state courts. That doesn't prohibit the federal government from arresting you and prosecuting you in federal court and throwing you in federal jail however
“If you have to be persuaded, reminded, pressured, lied to, incentivized, coerced, bullied, socially shamed, guilt-tripped, threatened, punished and criminalized … If all of this is considered necessary to gain your compliance - you can be absolutely certain that what is being promoted is not in your best interest.” - Ian Watson
There needs to be a law that limits presidential and congressional security to what they allow regular people to use. If we cant have it, they cant. Its called equality under he law.
The states are bound by the Constitution the same as the federal government. The fact is that the states whose laws infringe on the rights of the people should be taken to court over those laws.
Ofcourse he doesnt want to say and thank God hes not a judge you can tell he doesnt know what hes saying cause he has to be coached on what to say . He is another one that needs to go
Its simple jerry. The same brace that was approved 10 years ago is now considered an nfa item. The atf has flip flopped on this approval and has essentially written a law. There is no discernable difference between the approved brace and all thebother available braces . Steven dettlebach also lied under oath that simply removing the brace is acceptable fix . A week later the atf sent out a letter stating that you cannot own the brace and a firearm that it could be potentially attached to youre a felon.
There is a difference between a pistol and a short barrel weapon and we all know the difference . The major problem is that the atf has no right to choose what is legal and what is not legal. Only the congress and senate have the right to change any law not any agency.
So if your handgun-- as of right now, that is-- has one of these forearm braces attached to it in your home then you are going to prison for 10 years. I thought the purpose of these braces were to allow people(mostly veterans) with just one arm, to fire a handgun? Why would a person with one arm ever take this thing off? Surely this new rule would make most-- if not all-- 1-armed veterans, criminals.
Instead of arguing with Nadler, why doesn't Massie just say, "Ok, you're right. Let's codify that this brace and only this exact brace is legal and we'll move on to other braces at another time", and watch their head spin. First rule of negotiation is when they agree to the most salient point, you don't argue them out of it.
Sad thing, he’s a ranking member, that couldn’t even remember something that was said 1min prior to him repeating it. 5yrs in prison, no it’s 10yrs. What a foolish guy and the curly hair girl behind him, coaching him, what a shame, they’re supporting someone that is weaponizing our judiciary system. 🤦♀️
This argument has nothing to do with the idea of making America a safer place; that’s smoke and mirrors. I suggest that making the pistol brace a criminal violation is simply about money. I argue, in many jurisdictions the prisons are now managed, controlled, and owned by individual companies; so every prison bed is untapped monitory potential. These companies use their political influence…often represented by political donations…in an effort to keep these beds full and the money rolling in. Said differently…private corporations control and own the prisons (in some jurisdictions)…each prison bed is untapped potential, and the corporations only make money if the bed is filled…political donations are made in an attempt to influence political office holders…politicians who now represent these prison corporations use every political scam to support those who support them…and thus the pistol brace rule is changed. So something that has been legal for 10 years now becomes a felony, and Americans who would otherwise be safe from prison, become felons. So…you see…this is all about money… Your thoughts… PS As for Nadler...the guy belongs in prison
Nadler is echoing what the director of the ATF said in front Congress, which the ATF themselves said was incorrect. You cannot simply remove the brace from the firearm and still have it in your possession because of what the ATF is calling "constructive intent". Who is correct the ATF director and Nadler or the ATF who corrected the director?
Gotta get screwed and have the money to fight it in court while you are in jail and hope you make it to the supreme court and hope you don't get a libtard judge in the end Just by an AK...it's legal lol
Nadler literally read "... remove *AND* dispose ..." from the rule - proving Massie's point, and Massie dropped the win on the floor with a thud. How can these people be so bad at this?
Damn right. Ive noticed that if you watch any given represenative they'll all show their true colors.. they know most people will not watch closely, and if you do youre such a minority that they dont care what you see.
I have been targeted by the FBI. 702 is abused. I never been arrested! What they collected was not lawful. Here is how easy it is to get on a list. My wife starts having an affair with a junior jail house Los Angeles county sheriff. He puts my name in the hat and makes up stuff about me. Since 2019 I have seen the same people while on vacation in San Diego. 6 months later Las Vegas. They are part of the group that had my condo bugged. ( just ask my wife) . I have been broken into 6 times all reported without ever an arrest. Just this month it has become impossible to keep my condo since this group got me fired in 2020. One day near the veterans administration building in Los Angeles on wilshire Blvd I was almost run over by one of these followers. She was driving a Toyota 4 runner around a 2010. I know her because I have seen her many times from Orange County to Ventura county. She went at me while walking my friends “police dog”. I yell at her and call her a gang stalker. No foul language, just gang stalker. Which she is. That was around 10am by 3pm her husband who is in law enforcement driving a black General Motors SUV with a PS7 license plate. He tried to run me over while I was on a electric scooter. He then jumps out of the truck and comes after me. I square up to fist fight a cop with a gun and a guy who I have dates and times where he followed me on the 405 freeway. What else could I do. He the husband of the Amazon women who drove the 4 runner. She is 5’10” and not fat but thick. He is fat. Beer belly blond gray hair and about 5’9”. As he was coming at me another law enforcement guy in another vehicle pulled up and kept telling him to calm down. As he calmed down he started calling me names, also called me a Trump supporter , ( no-one knows if I am or if I am not) but he wanted to beat me up. Eventually he got in his vehicle provided by the tax payers and left. Of course I reported it and of course no arrests. Oh i did not get a call back. But the point is once the FBI runs your name they share it with other law enforcement. Once that happens you can’t stop what they can do to you. We must support the Congress this is more on the lines of weaponize government . Something Jim Jordon from Ohio is the chair on a current committee fighting this very thing. So when we watch the high ups at the FBI and they say”trust me” I will look the guy up and if he’s clean I will let it go. But all the juniors in law enforcement who don’t know anything take this information and run with it. Cops driving around parking lots and thier cruisers they are reading license plates. If your expired you don’t get a ticket they wait unil your driving then pull you over and that’s when you get the ticket. School board meetings , little league games,church on Sundays, it never ends. It’s unconstitutional. On you tube we see a big picture and that’s great but being Americans you could on a local level find out why taken the 5th is so insulting to law enforcement? Or why taken a wooden box and standing on the street corner and making up your own religion is not encouraged. I mean you don’t want the police to know you. Correction, I want my country back, and I want free speech, freedom of religion . Sorry to many family members have given up their lives fighting foreign wars so I would have these rights.
Government is way too involved in our own personal business. Time for them to back off our rights. And instead of the government monitoring civilians we should be monitoring the government. Any government employee should have their bank account and all funds in-and-out monitored more than the average civilian.
This is a nation of legislated law. This is NOT a nation of executive or bureaucracy rules. Big difference between LAWS and RULES and last I looked only one branch of this government has the ability to create LAWS and that is the legislative branch not the executive branch. Anyone can create rules and breaking them cannot get you fined or jailed by any government (local, state, federal, etc.). Only laws have this power because laws have to have the vast majority consensus of the people (through representation) to even have the ability to come to fruition. In other words, most of the people have to agree that a rule should become a law. I can make a rule that nobody can in my state is allowed to wear purple hats. Can I call the police if I see someone wearing one? Sure! Will they get in any trouble? No, because it's my rule, not a LAW. The ATF has just as much right to enforce some ARBITRARY RULE across this land as any single Joe Schmoe. NONE! NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER! If the people (through representation) don't agree to it, guess what...it ain't law.
Shall not infringe is all they do. Why? To control YOU!
If Nader can’t even understand what he is reading out loud then why on earth is he even in office? Why are so many mentally deficient people in office. This is just so they can be coached “controlled”. Get them out of office!!!!!
Why the Hell are taxpayers providing massive salaries and benefits to people like Joe Biden, Janet Yellen, Jerry Nadler, John Fetterman, Diane Feinstein, Maxine Watters, Karine Jean-Pierre, etc. etc. who are completely unable to perform even a portion of their jobs without instructions in an earpiece, prepared material on a teleprompter, reading from a voluminous binder, carrying a cheat sheet and providing answers to Congress only after being fed notes by some research drone?
Being mentally deficient is a prerequisite for being a Democrat.😊
Exactly.. they are installed not just simply coached or controlled
They're there because they serve a purpose, not to represent the people and our nation.
Hats off to Massie for maintaining “due respect.” Because Nadler’s ignorance and inability to accept facts had me swearing at my screen.
Its crazy that he can hear and read the facts and still seems incapable of admitting when he is wrong.
He's a jew. They're always right in their mind.
Jerry Nadler has made the remark that they knew better than the American voters that we are not smart enough to even vote
Really, me too
@@somedude9366
You are generalizing. I grew up in Miami around many Jewish people. Some made fools of themselves, some did not. People are people and their character has everything to do with upbringing. And I’m not Jewish.
It’s so sad he has to be coached by his handlers in the background
I’ve noticed that too.
He pooped himself on national television
@@DD-st5rh It sure looked like he did.
He's being coached, he's reading the "law" and still has it wrong. So sad!
It's like watching a counselor try and work with an autistic child in solving a word problem. One that tends to shit his pants 😂
There's no "loopholes" when it comes to a God given Constitutional right. Jerry.
Nadler is so ignorant of the function of the magazines for firearms. Magazines are preloaded by the owner so that changing magazines takes only a second or two. There is practically no difference in firing time between having 2 magazines and having 1 magazine that has the same capacity as 2.
Massie said I’ll wait until you can pay attention, you’re getting coached. LOL!
These radicals, such as Nadler, have to get their information and answers approved and handed to them by their handlers!! They are all just puppets doing someones else's bidding, and for what? The power? The money? Remember, follow the money!! How are these people becoming multi- millionaires on a Government salary?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉heute Abend mit dem Preis 🥇
Nadler sits there and reads the rule as per the Web sight, and still does not get that you can not under any circumstance own the brace. The web sight said that you have to remove it and make it unable to be used again. And it went right over his head.
That's what got me. He literally read the rule out loud, including the part that literally said "permanently alter or dispose". Not even a minute later, he says "correct" when Massie is quoting Dettleboch being entirely incorrect with his testimony. He literally has no logic skills, and is just a puppet of his staff coaching him from behind. This is the state of the modern democrat party, none of their politicians have a clue what they are talking about and are just pushing the party line being told to them by their staff.
He is so effing stupid!
He’s 76 years old. You can’t expect someone of that age to have strong reading comprehension or critical thinking abilities. Like so many of the other career politicians, they’re barely fit to be a store greeter. The military requires retirement at 62 (with some exceptions). If we aren’t going to have term limits, then at least have an age cut off.
He gets it, but as usual they believe if they keep repeating something false it will eventually become truth.
@@steamdespair9189 That was the same tactic the nazi's used.
So called "rules" can not be interpreted as laws sense they've never been voted on by Congress. That's how it works, period !
Since, but I’m sure it just a typo.
And so it should be. However, these 'rules' and 'regulations' carry the penalty of law bypassing Congress.
While I do not believe all of these bureaucratic agencies should be fully dismantled, I am a firm believer that they MUST be disempowered to enact rules with the power of law. I also believe a review of all rules and regulations imposed by these agencies is in order to discern Constitutional legality.
While we are on the subject, States that impose laws that are in conflict with the Constitution need to be properly reprimanded and/or fined (ALL federal funding withheld) until the law complies with the Constitution of the United States or is abolished.
I'm sure there are better ways to handle all of this. These are just generalized ideas.
---Just my two cents.
Saying, "period" doesn't make you right or make things a fact.
Congress has been giving away their power for a long time via allowing agencies to create regulations.
Oh, wait. I forgot to sound serious, PERIOD!
@@ogeafa1 Which is exactly WHY these agencies need to be utterly dismantled! - Susan Burns
@@deeannray5093 I want you to consider the possibility of something far worse being installed to place these agencies. Consider there are real investigations going on that are after really bad guys but under your idealism, that would end and they all go free. Removing their unconstitutional power is a far better option overall. Any entity that can create the very laws they enforce without oversight is just asking for corruption. Congress failed us in that respect. They gave away their power for an easier life and now suffer that decision.
---Just my two cents.
Dear American isn't time for you to send this guy to an Old age home😂
I love it when the Penguin coughs up sardines, gross bastard. Massie ROCKS!✌
Nadler is clueless!
Its embarrassing . My dog knows more about this subject.
Always was always will be .
He literally reads the rule out loud, and then gets it wrong less than a minute later. He can't understand basic logic it seems......
I disagree. Nadler does have a clue and that is what is sooo very dangerous.
@@gardengnome3249 Well, when you're following an agenda ............he's such a POS.
its crazy when one person knows what they are talking about and the other is jerry nadler
I think Nadler's Diaper is full.
You beat me to this comment. ❤
You beat me as well, hilarious. Best moment ever in history, let me scoot away, while I 💩 my pants, I’m front of camera 🤦♀️ 😂 😂
This was gr8, which more ppl saw the video of Nadler 💩 his pants, not many ppl has seen it, around my area at least.
Nadlers diaper is full because it's a safety reservoir for when his brain starts to overflow.
Full of your money.
Massie has so much patience....I couldn't do that. Massie needs to take McConnell's Senate seat.
Applause to Mr. Thomas Massie!!!
Isn't there a rule against Penguins and other vermin in our House?
Massie is Pointing out Nadler's COMPLETE IGNORANCE ON FIREARMS AND ACCESSORIES!!!
So if the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee (former) and the ATF Directard dont know what the law says, then WHO WROTE THE CRAP TO BEGIN WITH!?
Or better yet, why are they in a government position in the first place?
Whether it's a ban or not, it's an attack on disabled people, which most veterans also happen to be...
And Ironically, so is J.B..
He doesn’t even know wtf he’s defending Jesus nadler retire or prepare
I am an old lady who knows very little about guns. But Nadler is clueless.... And he is making legislation!!!
Why is Nadler so proud of being ignorant of the rules and laws that they are talking about? He has been a Representative for THIRTY YEARS. How does he not know what the penalties of violating federal NFA regulations are? How is he literally sitting there and making a point to show that he doesn't even know what the pistol brace rule says? Massie is RIGHT. The rule punishes POSSESSION of a pistol brace + pistol. Hence, it says to register or DESTROY the brace......
He is sitting here and showing that he can't even bother to inform himself of basic facts before trying to debate someone. Massie going to Cline for the answer was golden, since it points out how obvious it is that one side of the debate actually cares while the other is just trying to push gun control for gun control's sake.
Naddler is trying to keep them from removing the ATF's power to make law
GET RID OF THE ATF!!
Why is it legal to make a felon out of someone who does not register?
Please citizenry realize what’s being said here .
Can somebody explain to me why I'm not allowed to shoulder a pistol? I understand this is about a wrist brace, but the argument isn't.
For every crime, there are at least 200 criminals. Justice is not blind plea deals do exist. And some of those criminals are protected under their own law.
Nadler actually said “it makes it less repeatable”. What a clown.
I'm still trying to get a grasp of that. Maybe he cannot actually visualize what is being discussed here. He just looks like a dope every appearance now.
There is no “shoulder brace” its called a “Butt Stock … The ATF ALSO SAID that shouldering a pistol brace would NOT MAKE IT ILLEGAL to be used in that manner….
. Shall not infringed PERIOD
In my opinion, the NFA itself is unconstitutional. It is also stupid.
Corrupt and Stupid is more like it.
Boycott anything made in New York! You voted for Nadler, deal with it.
Nailer is totally delusional.
A mass shooter is not going to care in the least if he/she attaches a brace or not.
They will be going to jail for life anyway .
Wadle was under the impression there are 2 functionally different designs of the brace. Massie seem to imply there is not 2 designs without actually asserting it. Massie could have ended the confusion by asserting (not imply) there is one design of the brace not 2 if indeed there is just the one (forearm) design.
If they haven’t died from lead poisoning!
“I don’t like people legally owning guns therefore i will lie endlessly to people much more knowledgeable than I am on the topic. Just like I lied to my constituents on ANTIFA ‘ not being real’ .”
Thomas Massie is a very intelligent man who is just too intelligent for Nadler.
Nadler, the adults in the room are talking now.
👏👏👏 Well said
Massie is a RINO. One of 20 republicans who voted not to charge Schiff for his lies about Russiagate....snake in the grass...very very dangerous and bad for us all. Unpredictable and loyal to his kind. Disgusting
The Democrat cult doesn’t like being questioned. They hate having to defend their positions, because most of the time, they can’t...
This is going to be hard to listen to knowing Nadless will be speaking.
My brain can only take so much nonsense !
He’s the worst, I mean, I think him, Bush and AOC, are up there too, oh wait, dude that slept w/ the spy, his name slip my mind, but he’s the horrible too. 🤦♀️ awe man, also the ranking member that sits next to Jim Jordan, the black lady, can’t stand all of them. Every time I’m about to listen to them, I literally, cringe. That’s how horrible they are.
Supreme court shut this down
Nadler, while naddling away is a real toad. A big, brown toad.
I believe he was a model for Don Martin's characters in MAD magazine.
thought the , brown toad. was schiff💩
@@riverbender9898 I learn something new everyday. Thanks 👍
You spell turd wrong 💩
I hate spellcheck! Did you mean to say turd?
GET RID OF NADLER NOW!!
3/4 of our government needs to go
And neither one of these men understand that it's not the government that gives us permission. It's us that gives the government permission. Only problem is people let the government think its the other way around
"I'll wait until you pay attention while you're being coached"...LOL
There should not be no regulations on a constitutional amendment
Thomas Massie should be the president.
A benevolent dictator for life.
Ok, if the states can make laws that override the federal government, then states should be able to legalize owning silencers without requiring federal paperwork.
Nadler is doing his best do deflect and he's stuttering because he knows he's defending something unconstitutional.
States are permitted to write more restrictive laws even laws that violate the US Constitution. Those laws only get struck down after someone is injured by the law and they sue/appeal to potentially the US supreme court.
There is nothing that prohibits a state from passing a law saying suppressors or fully automatic rifles or anything weapons related is legal. You can then have a suppressor in that state and you will not be arrested by state authorities or prosecuted in state courts. That doesn't prohibit the federal government from arresting you and prosecuting you in federal court and throwing you in federal jail however
"Shall not be infringed" . . . who questions that is Treasonous and should be removed from Office.
Thomas Massie is so AWESOME!
“If you have to be persuaded, reminded, pressured, lied to, incentivized, coerced, bullied, socially shamed, guilt-tripped, threatened, punished and criminalized … If all of this is considered necessary to gain your compliance - you can be absolutely certain that what is being promoted is not in your best interest.” - Ian Watson
Nadler kept saying "posession" and when he is followed up with, "So we AGREE it's possession, not use?" - "NO, WE DO NOT AGREE, IT'S POSS-... USE."
imagine being the person that looks up laws on your phone for Nadler...
If the brace does not limit the weapons ability to fight tyranny, it should be okay.
Nadler, reading everything he said. He has no clue what he’s talking about. 🤦♀️ 🤦♀️
This is why we need term limits. Nadler has no comprehension of what he's talking about.
10 years? Nah, they upped it to 15 years.
And yes it is the possession, even constructive possession.
There needs to be a law that limits presidential and congressional security to what they allow regular people to use. If we cant have it, they cant. Its called equality under he law.
Oh, and I just want Nadler to know that he is the reason I feel this way.
Stupid is as stupid does. He is amazing in his though process.
The states are bound by the Constitution the same as the federal government. The fact is that the states whose laws infringe on the rights of the people should be taken to court over those laws.
Ofcourse he doesnt want to say and thank God hes not a judge you can tell he doesnt know what hes saying cause he has to be coached on what to say . He is another one that needs to go
How careless of Nadler is such a jerk for not making this fair to people.
The penguin just gave all the ammo to get this tossed in court great job
He is the chairman and he has no idea what the law he represents is. Are you f##cking kidding me!
He had no idea what he's talking about most stabilizers are used by one armed men, veterans, the handicapped.
Pretty soon he will try to convince us that sights are illegal
Making a gun more accurate is a felony? What a joke.
Its simple jerry. The same brace that was approved 10 years ago is now considered an nfa item. The atf has flip flopped on this approval and has essentially written a law. There is no discernable difference between the approved brace and all thebother available braces . Steven dettlebach also lied under oath that simply removing the brace is acceptable fix . A week later the atf sent out a letter stating that you cannot own the brace and a firearm that it could be potentially attached to youre a felon.
WOW. Just wow.
There is a difference between a pistol and a short barrel weapon and we all know the difference . The major problem is that the atf has no right to choose what is legal and what is not legal. Only the congress and senate have the right to change any law not any agency.
Ummm, Jerryyy ... Hellooo 🙋🏼♀️ You are confused! You're really struggling... You've been in Congress too long!
Term Limits Please!!!
He's been in office since the late eighties!!!
So if your handgun-- as of right now, that is-- has one of these forearm braces attached to it in your home then you are going to prison for 10 years. I thought the purpose of these braces were to allow people(mostly veterans) with just one arm, to fire a handgun?
Why would a person with one arm ever take this thing off? Surely this new rule would make most-- if not all-- 1-armed veterans, criminals.
Instead of arguing with Nadler, why doesn't Massie just say, "Ok, you're right. Let's codify that this brace and only this exact brace is legal and we'll move on to other braces at another time", and watch their head spin. First rule of negotiation is when they agree to the most salient point, you don't argue them out of it.
Nadler will say the ATF make law, we dont
Nadler is full of it
Sad thing, he’s a ranking member, that couldn’t even remember something that was said 1min prior to him repeating it. 5yrs in prison, no it’s 10yrs. What a foolish guy and the curly hair girl behind him, coaching him, what a shame, they’re supporting someone that is weaponizing our judiciary system. 🤦♀️
he needs to retire yesterday!
So what versions of the pistol brace are " legal " in the eyes 👀 of Congress?
This argument has nothing to do with the idea of making America a safer place; that’s smoke and mirrors. I suggest that making the pistol brace a criminal violation is simply about money. I argue, in many jurisdictions the prisons are now managed, controlled, and owned by individual companies; so every prison bed is untapped monitory potential. These companies use their political influence…often represented by political donations…in an effort to keep these beds full and the money rolling in.
Said differently…private corporations control and own the prisons (in some jurisdictions)…each prison bed is untapped potential, and the corporations only make money if the bed is filled…political donations are made in an attempt to influence political office holders…politicians who now represent these prison corporations use every political scam to support those who support them…and thus the pistol brace rule is changed. So something that has been legal for 10 years now becomes a felony, and Americans who would otherwise be safe from prison, become felons.
So…you see…this is all about money…
Your thoughts…
PS
As for Nadler...the guy belongs in prison
Boy Rae blessed to have republicans cleaning up this mess fro democrats
Why does it matter where the brace is fired from??
Here is how to resolve this issue, remove the ATF as a regulatory agency.
The young lady with the head scarf laughing at Nadler 7:30 as he "tries to understand" is hilarious. Time to retire Jerry!
She was laughing the entire time, at 1st I thought maybe she was laughing at Massie, but she was clearly laughing at Nadler. 😂 love it.
@@hunterpatrick5210 same. I thought Massie too at first, then realized it was Nadler.
And all the real criminals are getting released without bail or punishment...
Nadler is echoing what the director of the ATF said in front Congress, which the ATF themselves said was incorrect. You cannot simply remove the brace from the firearm and still have it in your possession because of what the ATF is calling "constructive intent". Who is correct the ATF director and Nadler or the ATF who corrected the director?
Gotta get screwed and have the money to fight it in court while you are in jail and hope you make it to the supreme court and hope you don't get a libtard judge in the end
Just by an AK...it's legal lol
Typical of politicians and lawyers twisting words to fit what they want.
Nadler literally read "... remove *AND* dispose ..." from the rule - proving Massie's point, and Massie dropped the win on the floor with a thud. How can these people be so bad at this?
Tell Nadler he's Lying 🤥 again
He knows he is lying.
Everyone knows.
2nd Article to the BoR "..........shall not be infringed."
He knows less then nothing about firearms
IGNORANCE IS STRONG IN NADLER
"can you explain how it helped?" Answer: no.
Just one question Rep. Massie, why not censor Adam Schiff?
Damn right.
Ive noticed that if you watch any given represenative they'll all show their true colors.. they know most people will not watch closely, and if you do youre such a minority that they dont care what you see.
Why do you "have to set the limit somewhere"?
We should not be asking the government for permission. That's not how this works. The government should be asking our permission!
Nadler dont know what he's talking about
Why is the ATF discriminating against disabled people?
it’s clear nadler already admitted what he is trying to say is incorrect he admitted that it was a ban
How do people like Nadler get voted into office over and over. SMH
I have been targeted by the FBI. 702 is abused. I never been arrested! What they collected was not lawful. Here is how easy it is to get on a list. My wife starts having an affair with a junior jail house Los Angeles county sheriff. He puts my name in the hat and makes up stuff about me. Since 2019 I have seen the same people while on vacation in San Diego. 6 months later Las Vegas. They are part of the group that had my condo bugged. ( just ask my wife) . I have been broken into 6 times all reported without ever an arrest. Just this month it has become impossible to keep my condo since this group got me fired in 2020. One day near the veterans administration building in Los Angeles on wilshire Blvd I was almost run over by one of these followers. She was driving a Toyota 4 runner around a 2010. I know her because I have seen her many times from Orange County to Ventura county. She went at me while walking my friends “police dog”. I yell at her and call her a gang stalker. No foul language, just gang stalker. Which she is. That was around 10am by 3pm her husband who is in law enforcement driving a black General Motors SUV with a PS7 license plate. He tried to run me over while I was on a electric scooter. He then jumps out of the truck and comes after me. I square up to fist fight a cop with a gun and a guy who I have dates and times where he followed me on the 405 freeway. What else could I do. He the husband of the Amazon women who drove the 4 runner. She is 5’10” and not fat but thick. He is fat. Beer belly blond gray hair and about 5’9”. As he was coming at me another law enforcement guy in another vehicle pulled up and kept telling him to calm down. As he calmed down he started calling me names, also called me a Trump supporter , ( no-one knows if I am or if I am not) but he wanted to beat me up. Eventually he got in his vehicle provided by the tax payers and left. Of course I reported it and of course no arrests. Oh i did not get a call back. But the point is once the FBI runs your name they share it with other law enforcement. Once that happens you can’t stop what they can do to you. We must support the Congress this is more on the lines of weaponize
government . Something Jim Jordon from Ohio is the chair on a current committee fighting this very thing. So when we watch the high ups at the FBI and they say”trust me” I will look the guy up and if he’s clean I will let it go. But all the juniors in law enforcement who don’t know anything take this information and run with it. Cops driving around parking lots and thier cruisers they are reading license plates. If your expired you don’t get a ticket they wait unil your driving then pull you over and that’s when you get the ticket. School board meetings , little league games,church on Sundays, it never ends. It’s unconstitutional. On you tube we see a big picture and that’s great but being Americans you could on a local level find out why taken the 5th is so insulting to law enforcement? Or why taken a wooden box and standing on the street corner and making up your own religion is not encouraged. I mean you don’t want the police to know you. Correction, I want my country back, and I want free speech, freedom of religion . Sorry to many family members have given up their lives fighting foreign wars so I would have these rights.
He knows nothing about this. He's lost.
Government is way too involved in our own personal business. Time for them to back off our rights. And instead of the government monitoring civilians we should be monitoring the government. Any government employee should have their bank account and all funds in-and-out monitored more than the average civilian.
Easy to see Nadlers comprehension skills are lacking!
10 years not 5 year penalty.
How is this man still in Congress?
Larry doesn't even know what he's talking about - stepping all over himself
HAVE A GOOD NITE CORPS !!
This is a nation of legislated law. This is NOT a nation of executive or bureaucracy rules. Big difference between LAWS and RULES and last I looked only one branch of this government has the ability to create LAWS and that is the legislative branch not the executive branch. Anyone can create rules and breaking them cannot get you fined or jailed by any government (local, state, federal, etc.). Only laws have this power because laws have to have the vast majority consensus of the people (through representation) to even have the ability to come to fruition. In other words, most of the people have to agree that a rule should become a law. I can make a rule that nobody can in my state is allowed to wear purple hats. Can I call the police if I see someone wearing one? Sure! Will they get in any trouble? No, because it's my rule, not a LAW. The ATF has just as much right to enforce some ARBITRARY RULE across this land as any single Joe Schmoe. NONE! NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER! If the people (through representation) don't agree to it, guess what...it ain't law.
Shall not be infringed.