A few points to ponder 1) nano urea contains urea, 2) products with micron size unto 10 micron i.e 10,000 nano can enter stomata on leaf. 3) stomata are mostly found on lower epidermis , have a raised structure (lip) which prevents entry of water droplet. 4) leaf pore through epidermis is a good route for products to enter in leaf. 5) , and it should have no problem in entry into leaf. 6) No trial/ data with labelled N in Nano and normal urea ( radioactive labelled Urea) available for making assumptions 7) At best Nano Urea can be called a Foliar N fertiliser , but 19:19:19 , KNO3 , 1 % Normal Urea Solution are very much cost effective and give better results than Nano Urea. 8) If Nano Urea was effective as claimed , why increase content Nano Urea from 4 to 20 % ? That too keeping price same ( 225/ 500 ml bottle) . Which manufacturer can afford to do this 5 times increase at same price ? 9) The specification of previous 4 % Nano Urea gave 500 % tolerance 1-5 % N ( all other fertilisers have tolerance of about 0.2 ), very clearly help is being extended from highest levels .
How you compare soil applied Normal urea with Foliar applied nano urea? why not compare with other n sources such as 1 % normal urea solution , KNo3, A. sulphate , calcium nitrate etc ......?
Is their data to show Nutrient use efficiency of foliar applied n fertilisers including nano urea? In that case how can 1 bottle be equal to 1 bag of Urea fertiliser
if pollution is a concern why not reduce use of Normal urea ? If only 2 bag of urea per farmer are given on subsidy , the problem of excess use will be solved.
Tq sir for the information❤
A few points to ponder 1) nano urea contains urea, 2) products with micron size unto 10 micron i.e 10,000 nano can enter stomata on leaf. 3) stomata are mostly found on lower epidermis , have a raised structure (lip) which prevents entry of water droplet. 4) leaf pore through epidermis is a good route for products to enter in leaf. 5) , and it should have no problem in entry into leaf. 6) No trial/ data with labelled N in Nano and normal urea ( radioactive labelled Urea) available for making assumptions 7) At best Nano Urea can be called a Foliar N fertiliser , but 19:19:19 , KNO3 , 1 % Normal Urea Solution are very much cost effective and give better results than Nano Urea. 8) If Nano Urea was effective as claimed , why increase content Nano Urea from 4 to 20 % ? That too keeping price same ( 225/ 500 ml bottle) . Which manufacturer can afford to do this 5 times increase at same price ? 9) The specification of previous 4 % Nano Urea gave 500 % tolerance 1-5 % N ( all other fertilisers have tolerance of about 0.2 ), very clearly help is being extended from highest levels .
Sir Nano DAP
Ki bhi ek class add kr do
Thanks for detailed information.
How you compare soil applied Normal urea with Foliar applied nano urea? why not compare with other n sources such as 1 % normal urea solution , KNo3, A. sulphate , calcium nitrate etc ......?
Is their data to show Nutrient use efficiency of foliar applied n fertilisers including nano urea? In that case how can 1 bottle be equal to 1 bag of Urea fertiliser
if pollution is a concern why not reduce use of Normal urea ? If only 2 bag of urea per farmer are given on subsidy , the problem of excess use will be solved.
Thankyou sir ❤️
Bhai, dosage kitna hai.
Sir Nano uriya se 4 questions aaye iffco
❤❤❤❤
Sir... aap bahot bat repeat bahot karte ho.. aap time pass bahot karte ho.. jo bhi message hai vo short me bolna chaiye