CA Bar Exam Free Speech Approach

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 มี.ค. 2016
  • Your approach makes all the difference between passing or failing the California Bar Exam. The examiners are looking for a specific style of writing and for specific thought patterns!
    CA Bar Style knows what the examiners are looking for and to prove it we would like to share our approach for the Free Speech section of Contract Law. Our head tutor Shana Karpeles walks you through every step and hurdle. We hope it helps. If you want more videos like this comment below!!!!
    If you are taking the California Bar Exam for the first time or have failed and are trying again. We can help you! Call Shana today. (818) 616-3302
    www.CABarStyle.com

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @DonYutuc
    @DonYutuc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Who's watching in 2024? "The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment does not protect expression such as “fighting words,” obscenity, defamation and speech intended and likely to provoke imminent lawlessness. Headnote the ones that apply!" Thank you, Shana. You are amazing 👏

  • @kampmusic
    @kampmusic 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is exactly what I needed! Thank you!

  • @boxingguy08
    @boxingguy08 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I don't think symbolic speech means what you said. I think those are establishment clause issues. Symbolic speech means expressive conduct, aka draft-card burning and flag burning. The test you articulated is used for that conduct.

    • @shoshanakarpeles9763
      @shoshanakarpeles9763 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The test articulated is accurate. But, thank you for your feedback!

  • @ransomemckissick8184
    @ransomemckissick8184 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video! Breaks it right down! Do you do personal tutoring for the CA Bar Exam? If so, I am interested, as I am taking the February 2022 CA Bar exam.

    • @cabarstyle
      @cabarstyle  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Ransome! Yes, we do and are currently enrolling for the February 2022 Early Prep Program. Please email cabarstyle@yahoo.com and we can setup a phone consult with you to go over your needs!

  • @ECWnWWF
    @ECWnWWF 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    she makes this difficult
    The First Amendment is a "Right", it's not a privilege. A "Right" is an action that does not cause harm to other being. "Rights" are granted by the Creator (Declaration of Independence) and not by other human beings or group of human beings calling themselves "government".
    If the speech could insight violence or harm to another individual, their property,, or their freedom - than the speech is not protected under the Bill of Rights or the Declaration of Independence.
    The Bill of Rights is an extension of the 1787 Constitution, which in Article VI states that the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land and Judges in every state shall be bound thereby. Any thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
    That means things like Free Speech zones and maritime admiralty law, does not stand.