Beyond the Atom: INCREDIBLE Plunge into the Heart of Matter towards the Infinitely Small Documentary

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ค. 2024
  • 🌍 Have you ever wondered what the foundations of our reality are based on?
    What if I told you that the world around us is governed by mysterious particles and invisible dimensions?
    Would you believe me?
    Nothing could be further from the truth...
    Yet the nature of the forces and elements that shape our universe is unknown to us.
    Admittedly, scientific advances over the last few centuries have enabled us to understand in detail the events that unfold on a macroscopic scale.
    But when we venture onto smaller scales, it's as if we're entering a parallel reality whose workings escape us.
    In this world of the infinitely small, the laws of physics and relativity we know no longer apply.
    Instead, we find strange, sometimes invisible particles interacting in ways so mysterious that we find it hard to believe how they work.
    Quantum physics, string theory, supersymmetry, the uncertainty principle...
    So much vocabulary that attempts to describe the mechanisms of this invisible reality to make it easier to understand.
    🔥 As a reminder, videos are published on SUNDAYS at 6pm.
    -------------------------
    💥Voyage vers l'Infiniment Petit:
    - Each discovery inevitably raises its own set of questions...
    In their quest to probe the microscopic world, scientists have nonetheless been able to venture deep into nature's smallest secrets.
    While a few decades ago we thought that atoms were the inseparable building blocks of matter, today we know that these elements are home to an incredible bestiary of particles.
    Quarks, gluons, Higgs bosons, neutrinos, photons...
    It's enough to make you dizzy!
    To say that these elements are minuscule is an understatement.
    To understand this, let's compare scales.
    Observations of the cosmos tell us that the diameter of the observable universe is around 93 billion light-years.
    This universe would include between 100 and 200 billion galaxies.
    In fact, our Milky Way is but a tiny drop of water in a cosmic ocean.
    Yet, from our perspective, its dimensions are inordinate: almost 53,000 light-years.
    That's enough to house between 200 and 400 billion stars, and probably more than 100 billion planets...
    Among these stars is our sun: nearly 700,000 km in radius.
    That's around 109 times the diameter of the Earth.
    Our beautiful blue planet, gigantic to our eyes, is in reality invisible to those of the cosmos.
    For if the solar system were a city twenty kilometers across, the Earth would be little more than a grape.
    And yet, nearly 8 billion human beings live on it.
    But then again, appearances are deceptive, as man is far from occupying all the space available on Earth.
    If we were to group together all the human beings currently living, they would fit on an area equivalent to the city of Los Angeles...
    So, compared to a modestly-sized terrestrial planet, man is a grain of sand.
    If this scale comparison gives you a slight headache, just wait for the next part.
    Because it's possible to go much further.
    Each human being, however microscopic compared to the cosmos, is made up of around 30,000 billion cells.
    And these tiny cells, observable only under the microscope, are themselves made up of 100,000 billion atoms!
    This figure varies greatly from cell to cell, but it's still completely excessive.
    Wait, we can go even further...
    If you look at the core of atoms, you'll be amazed to discover that they're 99.9%... empty!
    In other words, matter is theoretically made up of nothingness!
    It may sound crazy, but hidden in this nothingness are tiny elements of the quantum world that give life to the reality we know.
    And although we are made of atoms, their profound nature seems even more distant than the confines of the observable universe.
    So, the infinitely small conceals many mysteries.
    So get ready to travel to the heart of matter!
    Together, we'll try to unlock its secrets by literally looking deep inside ourselves...
    -------------------------
    🎬 Today's program:
    00:00 - Introduction
    06:11 - The macroscopic world
    21:27 - Diving into the heart of atoms
    35:44 - Subatomic particles
    39:45 - Quarks
    48:46 - Leptons
    50:55 - Bosons
    55:25 - The Standard Model
    1:03:51 - Higgs boson
    1:08:45 - The mysteries of quantum physics
    1:18:20 - String theory
    1:23:38 - Supersymmetry
    1:26:26 - Quantum loop theory
    Wondody is an official channel affiliated to the network ©Production Orbinea
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 1.1K

  • @MugiwaraTed
    @MugiwaraTed 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +383

    Play this at 1.25 speed and it sounds normal

    • @ViraL_FootprinT.ex.e
      @ViraL_FootprinT.ex.e 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Much better. Thanks.

    • @andrewgallagher6612
      @andrewgallagher6612 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Nice 1

    • @bmon4095
      @bmon4095 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Thank you. I almost gave up until I saw this. Thanks again.

    • @johnlilley9363
      @johnlilley9363 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      1.5 seems like the Goldilocks speed, reminiscent of the narrator for ‘how it’s made’

    • @TBoneTheGreat1
      @TBoneTheGreat1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Holy crap your right!

  • @jimmyballer7047
    @jimmyballer7047 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +569

    The person who okayed this narration deserves to have their eulogy delivered by the same computer voice, in a church full of robots that can't cry.

    • @johnotis8553
      @johnotis8553 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Ha 🎉

    • @easytokillme9910
      @easytokillme9910 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Many mysterieszzzzz

    • @averteddisasterbarely2339
      @averteddisasterbarely2339 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +82

      Someone said to play it at 1.25. It sounds normal !!

    • @khuti007
      @khuti007 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHA that is a good one !!!
      I immediately think of Blade Runner

    • @mikemines2931
      @mikemines2931 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Wake me up when its over.

  • @jcsealock
    @jcsealock 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Some unfortunate word choices that I am sure confuse some viewers - 1. At 18:30 while comparing moon-earth to electron-atomic nuclei, stating that electrons "gravitate" conotes that gravity play a role in this system which cannot be farther from the truth. 2. Using the term "element" to mean molecules - at 23:40 in the presentation - "But to form the countless types of ELEMENTS we know atoms have to come together and combine - this is how molecules form. " Elements are formed via fusion or broken down via fission not via bonds between atoms.

  • @krishnakumar-kv8zu
    @krishnakumar-kv8zu 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    Indeed playing the video at 1.25 times the normal speed , a comment by one viewer , actually makes the narration sound more human and makes it possible to sit through the entire video at least one time.

    • @kenhammscousin4716
      @kenhammscousin4716 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      True

    • @tolgamatouk7206
      @tolgamatouk7206 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      There’s an entire section of TH-cam where millions of people play these specific videos while they are going to sleep to help them sleep or have something to listen to while trying to sleep? Some people fall asleep easier when listening to something like this and I think this video in particular was targeting that audience.
      Instantly wanted to lay down and close my eyes and sleep hearing this video 😂,

    • @CerberusHD
      @CerberusHD 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nice advice, now it's normal speed xD

    • @ranjittyagi9354
      @ranjittyagi9354 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@tolgamatouk7206haha, yes.

    • @FaridShahidinejad
      @FaridShahidinejad 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It sounds normal to me at 1.75. This dude is sloooow

  • @hughstan1
    @hughstan1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Watch this at 1.25 speed. Your 😊 welcome.

    • @Stellar-Forge
      @Stellar-Forge 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Better, but still not great. Thanks for the sugar coating for this episode. Lol

    • @tksperformance8789
      @tksperformance8789 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Much better, thx 👍🏼

    • @mrwright4343
      @mrwright4343 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks

  • @bonerici
    @bonerici 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Instead of speeding it up i slowed it down now it sounds like a wino cornered you in an alley to explain the universe

    • @kevinsmith-yw9dq
      @kevinsmith-yw9dq 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Genius! Can’t take the 3hr run time at 1/2 speed though

    • @scottwickstrum6977
      @scottwickstrum6977 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Perfect speed for late night, or early morning.

  • @kellywhitcomb5508
    @kellywhitcomb5508 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Putting emphasis on the end of the words, this AI is testing the patience of humans.

    • @nikkiva7
      @nikkiva7 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      i thought i was the only one that noticed this... i'm half way through the video and i can't watch this anymore

    • @timetravellingbackwardsisp5337
      @timetravellingbackwardsisp5337 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      i was done after 15 seconds

    • @davidadams2395
      @davidadams2395 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@timetravellingbackwardsisp5337
      Same here.

    • @user-yz5pk2mr8c
      @user-yz5pk2mr8c 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      exactly that is really annoying great video except of that fact

    • @kookamunga2458
      @kookamunga2458 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great video but I find the way the narrator drags his words out to be annoying. It's just as annoying as the way gangsters from the hood speak .

  • @everettnichols9062
    @everettnichols9062 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    It is as I have often remarked, "If one looks deeply enough into the nature of creation, they may eventually glimpse the hand of God at work".

  • @larrysorenson4789
    @larrysorenson4789 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    From my first exposure to science in elementary school I have been fascinated with smallness. I recall telling a teacher that I believed that there were particles of matter so small that they pass right through what we call matter without any interference at all, just like we are passing through our universe. And so in 1954 he encouraged me by remarking: “That’s interesting.” Those particles are now common knowledge.

  • @prestonbacchus4204
    @prestonbacchus4204 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Here is an hypothesis: If you look small enough and close enough we will find that every single particle in existence, though existing within a frequency range, is unique. No two particles are exactly alike, like snowflakes. That means that every interaction involving multiple particles will always generate a unique function.

    • @ericvondell5157
      @ericvondell5157 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So; what You're suggesting here is That; Even I have a Unique Function!
      Here's My Hypothesis;
      Well, not quite Mine 😹
      Although, I wouldn't Tell one, To It's Beak; The Kytuhryxhah "Kytuhrah" (Thaylaxhahs regalis) is actually a kind of Nudibranch!🙀💖
      TWO THINGS:
      1) Scriptures define The True God as Spirit, Invisible and The Light Of Eternal Mind! Thusly defining The Universe as a Simulation!
      Genesis 1:1 Says: "The Universe is a Simulation!"
      John 1:1 Says: "So's God!"
      (At Least the "God" We Physically Interact With!)
      2) AN EXTRATERRESTRIAL VISITORS POV:
      We Don't Have To Invade Earth 🌎
      IT'S ALREADY OURS!!!
      Stupid Monkeys!
      Long Live The Draconian Empire!
      Death to the Stupid Monkeys!
      Death to Their Gods!
      There's a Reason Why It's Called An EMPIRE!!!
      Nobody You Stupid Monkeys Know Can Defeat Us!
      The ONLY Thing We Fear is God;
      And, HE'S, On OUR Side!!!
      Don't Believe Us?
      Those teensy bits of weirdness You've been finding implanted in you is Merely to show you that Such Things Exist!
      THOSE, Are Just, Nonfunctioning Junk!
      The REAL Things are Smaller than Viruses, Utterly Undetectable to Your crude Monkey Technology, and:
      Zillions Upon Zillions of These Ultra Advanced Nanotechnology Drones Are With You Already;
      They're
      EVERYWHERE!
      In EVERYTHING!
      And EVERYONE!
      WE
      ARE
      WATCHING
      YOU!!!
      And, as for "Crashed Alien Spaceships, and UFO's";
      Seriously?
      We Don't Even Need Spaceships!!!
      STUPID MONKEYS!
      🙏🛸💫✨
      PS: We're Already Running The Planet!
      WE Can Be Everywhere!
      We Can Be Anything!
      We Can Look Just Like YOU!!!😱
      From Witches and Familiar Spirits to Your Pets, Toys, Friends, Bullies, Weird Neighbors, Normal Neighbors, Jewelry, Gadgets, Medical Equipment, Artificial Body Parts, Vaccines, Foods, Microbial Organisms, Every Cell In Your Bodies, Even In Your Underwear!!!
      The Earth, And, YOU, Are Already OURS!!!
      GET OVER IT 🙀😱🛸
      THIS Video is further proof of the above!
      We Came, We Saw, We Conquered!
      A LONG TIME AGO 🙀😱😸🦖🦕🐲🐉🛸👽🌎🎉
      God Bless The Draconian Empire 🙏💖🐉🛸🖖
      Sincerely:
      GOD💖
      C/O THE DRACONIAN EMPIRE🐉

  • @manuelteixeira2496
    @manuelteixeira2496 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    that you said with truth: "The forces involved in the foundation of our observable reality are unknown" to us.

  • @ricocapili6990
    @ricocapili6990 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    With the rate of astronomical and quantum discovery we humans are doing right now till the next century, it will be quite rare for us to be alone. And one can truly say indeed we are special, no doubt about it..

  • @boygraphychannel
    @boygraphychannel 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Never have I ever heard such an exciting subject narrated so dispassionately.

    • @bretttobin9632
      @bretttobin9632 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The robot voice is lame.

    • @lgbfjb7160
      @lgbfjb7160 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I get it however I find that emotional language distracts and annoys me thereby preventing a better comprehension of the subject matter.
      The older you get, the more tiring it becomes to see and hear undo and unnecessary excitement and the sometimes overly expressive hand gesture that PBS host apply. Lol

  • @IgnatiusVaz
    @IgnatiusVaz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Imagine all these wonders, precision and complexity happened by chance, no one directing, for no cause!

    • @STARDRIVE
      @STARDRIVE 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What are the chances.

    • @IgnatiusVaz
      @IgnatiusVaz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Zada, Zilch, Zero@@STARDRIVE

  • @jimbernard8964
    @jimbernard8964 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Great series. Glad I found it. Subscribed.

  • @infonestor2725
    @infonestor2725 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Science is dynamic and its explaination to the " more understandig level" also takes time and simplification of this vomplicated matter. This presentation is the most outstanding o jsve listened to in my lige as scientist. Great job and all thumbs up for the creators of this extraordinary summary what is " everything what we know about our existing univers around us based on current knowledge...this is a never ending journey to " real origin of energy, which may never become possible. But that journey will reveal a lot of new inside view of what it is composed of.Our imagination will growth over time though, it always does.i just wonder now, since imagination, knowledge , consciousness and alike is also ( a form of) energy, how can " energy explain energy" other then by new subatomic theories. Where is the missing " Heureka " like the " source of enery" , the unique" all- in-one" source of energy? Singularity, big bang..hmm..? Actually why not only state, too wirde: everything is an illusion created by ....(dark) energy which always was there and will exist infinitely 😊

  • @TheEnigmaUniverse-vt2pm
    @TheEnigmaUniverse-vt2pm 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Whenever I'm sad, I often listen to your videos. It both helps me gain more knowledge and helps me sleep easier in this stressful life

    • @whizzer2944
      @whizzer2944 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes , makes you realize how insignificant we are in the scale of the universe,helps me too.

    • @MadScientist267
      @MadScientist267 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great for generating anxiety at normal speed

  • @spaceman081447
    @spaceman081447 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    I don't usually do this, particularly on science videos, but this thing actually put me to sleep.

    • @pitbullmom3234
      @pitbullmom3234 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂 I AGREED I love it

    • @treyvon4444
      @treyvon4444 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I usually like space vids but this is the micro universe so I can relate.

    • @TheDavidlloydjones
      @TheDavidlloydjones 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Are you sure you were awake to start with?

    • @stephenjohnhopkinson8096
      @stephenjohnhopkinson8096 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Was that an attack or a compliment? Only time is fundamental for anything to ever have existed in infinity. These people know about the 0 space singularity yet believe in the plank length. Space doesn't exist it's information stored in the flow of time to contain the information of the reality we experience. I want to save the world but everyone is dumb.

    • @kevinlutz5994
      @kevinlutz5994 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Church sermons do the same thing to me.

  • @aarusty51
    @aarusty51 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    No matter how small matter is, it has to be in something. That something must be infinite.

    • @basedgamerguy818
      @basedgamerguy818 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You just stating something doesn't make it true

  • @michaelbryant4703
    @michaelbryant4703 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Mind blown, amazing, a true gem. Thank you

  • @JimKrause1975
    @JimKrause1975 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I absolutely love it!!! As always!

  • @laurv8370
    @laurv8370 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    nice storyline, it should have been even better if the images and animations had anything to do with the talk and not only random stuff from around the web

    • @davidevans3227
      @davidevans3227 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      it's nice to come across someone else who thought that..
      and together with the narration, very off putting for me..

    • @C-man553
      @C-man553 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Many deep science videos are like this, visuals corresponding to the subject at hand simply not being available. Boltzmann vids are like this,

    • @laurv8370
      @laurv8370 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@C-man553 Actually, it is not so bad like I initially said😀, sorry for my outburst, and you would not believe it 😛, but I watch it a second time (well... only some parts🤫) and the sound is just plainly shifted with few seconds (it is getting worse towards the end of the video). If you shift and squeeze a bit the sound column (VLC can do that easily) it makes a bit more sense. (edit: I am not talking about abstract stuff, Boltzmann and co., but especially when he talks about simple stuff, chemical bonds, and things everyone knows from high school chemistry classes, he talks about metallic bonds and show covalent, then he talks about ionic and show metallic, then he talks about hydrogen bonds but shows ionic, etc, this is killing my OCD 😳, but if you shift the sound column, it makes sense). I think the author(s) should repost it with the right alignment of the sound and image.

    • @C-man553
      @C-man553 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@laurv8370 Outburst? No. History of the universe does quality work. An interim prob somewhere.
      I just started this but can tell it will indeed be interesting. Cool Worlds does superb work as well.

  • @markdeffebach8112
    @markdeffebach8112 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    If matter is indeed energy, there is no end to the subdivision of "fundamental" particles since each is like a standing wave of energy and breaking them involves adding energy by smashing which likely increases vibrational energy resulting in more complex waveforms which will have more harmonic components.

    • @ericvondell5157
      @ericvondell5157 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Energy is the kinetic State Of A Something, but, is NOT Itself a Something. Energy is, Actually, A "Nothing"!
      Sorta like Gravity is an Effect Rather than a Thing. There's no Gravity Particle Yet, Gravity has Force and creates it's own secondary effects. Gravity Waves are one Such Secondary Effect! That is Gravity's Kinetic State!
      Potential Energy (Static Energy)
      Kinetic Energy (Motion)
      Conduction Energy (The Transference of Energy from one thing to another!) This Was What We Were taught In My Century. But, It's probably different Nowadays 🙀🤪💖

  • @TahirKhan-ez4dj
    @TahirKhan-ez4dj 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Every new discovery produces new questions adding to our curiosity - this is good for us as we are better to be curious all the while rather than come to a stalemate by knowing everything.

    • @ninner196
      @ninner196 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      For sure. This sounded humble instead of hearing a highminded haughty physicist think they can explain our existence away. Nothing against scientists especially since being one but we do not know very much in comparison to who made our universe, amazing how much power exists and could be used , infinite.😊

  • @sonarbangla8711
    @sonarbangla8711 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Infinitely small or atom, reality is made of quantum fields that collapse to produce fine tuned particles leading to life, consciousness, soul and faith as physics rolls into metaphysics.

    • @EinsteinKnowedIt
      @EinsteinKnowedIt 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Quantum? Great comment! But do you actually believe any object can occupy any more space than that which it resides? Rotating fan blades no matter how fast, still occupy only one spot in a given iota of a moment.

    • @OmniMale
      @OmniMale 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@EinsteinKnowedItremember, the quantum realm is counter intuitive.
      Quantum super imposition doesn't say, " same space at the same time. Now I'm a layman so bear with me.
      What we call matter (fan blades) is made up mostly if empty space. The particles that are there exist as probability fields. Imposition means they exist in a place and yet don't exist in that place, simultaneously. The double slit experiment shows that these fields (or particles once observed) take every possible route between a and z.
      Since it's based on probability, you take into consideration other factors like other particles in that same spot, speed, etc.

    • @EinsteinKnowedIt
      @EinsteinKnowedIt 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @OmniMale My position is this. The cat in the box 📦 is either living or dead. It can not be both.
      Let's look at the real world. The box is the earth 🌎. Someone 60 light years away has a contraption, so refined that it can see humans on this planet. They see me as a child. They see living beings who we know have long perished.
      There is no escalated Vietnam War, etc. It hasn't happened yet. That is the Earth they see. However, I am not both a 7 year old and a 67 year old. The cat in the box can not be both dead and alive. I confess ignorance to what one can see and interpret on the subatomic level.
      Nature does what nature does. Quantum mechanics, smearing reality, and obscurity seem one and the same.
      So if we are using any Quantum technology, then by that fact, it can be said to be a part of nature because we are a part of nature using nature to do something puzzling. So we have Quantum computers. The power is either on or off. Not both. Send more examples defending Quantum theory.
      I'd like to read them.

    • @paxwallace8324
      @paxwallace8324 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@OmniMaleIf all subatomic phenomena are actually higher dimensional phenomena, then the fact that the messy inelegant world of the Standard Model is invariably empirically verifiable is truly a tribute to the Scientific Method because we're working at an inherent disadvantage stuck in these 4 dimensions. Steven Weinberg one of the Nobel Laureates for the Standard Model said of Ed Whittens particular mathematical construct. M-Theory "That something as elegant and beautiful as M-Theory could just be wrong seems highly unlikely" He said it on a TV show by Brian Greene

  • @handsupbud
    @handsupbud 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    It would be interesting if we could discuss these therories with an Alien and they just looked at us and laughed explaining to us just how wrong we really were and then explained just how simple it all is but how we're approaching it the wrong way.

    • @SovereignSlave1
      @SovereignSlave1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      and that wrong way is that we wait way to long before we allow static electricity its formidable place in the early moments of creation immediately following the Big Bang. If we fit static electricity where it belongs string theory is no longer needed.

    • @Titanis2000
      @Titanis2000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I truly agree with you , Cant prove it but I feel we for sure are not alone ...... I would absolutely enjoy a more detailed explanation on how and why all the element function as they do ........ If I was ever abducted that would be one of my questions .

    • @timetravellingbackwardsisp5337
      @timetravellingbackwardsisp5337 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Titanis2000 You dont have to ask anything, they shove a probe into your exit instead, dont you know?

    • @jojolafrite90
      @jojolafrite90 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Come on, you FEEL???!!! David Grush! An,d the complete context of what was disclosed sionce 2017, the WHOLE THING, NOW!@@Titanis2000

    • @krox477
      @krox477 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are no aliens

  • @seanbarrett2629
    @seanbarrett2629 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Infinity streches down beyond quantum, and outwards to infinity beyond the universes

  • @idegteke
    @idegteke 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    An atom is the smallest thing that has a full set of qualities, therefore, the atom is the smallest thing that gives us the opportunity to fully detect it in our discoverable universe in terms of size, weight, spatial position etc. By detecting all available aspects of subatomic particles, we still can’t have its complete set of physical attributes. This, however, means that subatomic particles don’t necessarily have to follow the axioms, causality, rules and constants we observe in the case of atoms, molecules and above. Talking about the mass, size, precise position of and, most importantly, about the role played by a subatomic particle is like talking about the taste of the rainbow, or the physical mass of an idea or the amount of light emitted by empty space - it’s like trying to display the value of a C++ variable without defining its type, let alone its value. For example, (certain?) particles appear to have dual nature because they are beyond being either matter or wave, appear to be entangled because they are not fully separated on a deeper level, etc - they are only partially described by attributes we observe in our discoverable universe - which means, however terrible it is even to consider: they just partially exist in our discoverable universe. Physical existence of subatomic particles, at least in our discoverable universe, is not a Boolean value.

  • @twisted1800
    @twisted1800 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    I love these types of videos, there's so much that we don't know, it's truly mind boggling 😮

    • @DrDeuteron
      @DrDeuteron 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There’s so much we do know

    • @lobster7799
      @lobster7799 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@DrDeuteron not really, we have no idea what dark energy and matter is which make up 96 percent of the universe. On top of gravity and quantum . We haven’t even scratched the surface.

    • @synisterfish
      @synisterfish 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yeah... but what here isn't made up or based in speculation...?
      These are the beliefs of the scientific worldview.
      There's no 'knowledge' here... just a bunch of 'real-ised' models one must put their faith in.

    • @Noqtis
      @Noqtis 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know everything, you are just being stupid.

    • @LordofSyn
      @LordofSyn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@synisterfish
      Those models are tested time and again. Those tests and the scientific method give us insight as to the accuracy. Faith is not necessary at all unless you consider faith in the scientific method itself.
      Stay skeptical, stay resourceful, do not give up. Science is about moving the goal posts because it is impossible to know everything but we now know much more (even in a general stance) and understand more than we've ever done before as an animal species. All of those advancements are because of the toils of science.

  • @ynkybomber
    @ynkybomber 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I hope we can find an island of elemental stability. Metallic Hydrogen would be the most useful material ever.

    • @briangiles2146
      @briangiles2146 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wouldn't it though

  • @dionnelong
    @dionnelong 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you. The quarks and etc. of a single proton or neutron....are these small particles that make up protons and neutrons. According to Einstein are just energy, that has no mass. According to Einstein, it's only if/when their force can be determined against friction, only at that moment, do they have mass, but that's only because of the force of the explosion (causality), if they move slower than cause. If they move faster than cause, then they have no mass. The way I understood it, is if they move faster than cause, then they can't be sped up by another cause, then they have no mass. It's a blessing to be able to move faster than cause! If that is truly possible, then existence has always exist. If this is true then existed, is an incorrect word for it, because existence never failed to exist. You are the one demonstrating this video, because of forces beyond some of our control. The soul that is willing, if it is not prevented, if it can overcome your evil, the evil of Cain, then those souls will reach nirvana, and arrive at enlightenment. The enlightenment of existence, which is God himself. Good is determined by the needs of the souls of human beings. Without living creatures, good would have no reason to exist; however it still does exist.

  • @petemchardy3605
    @petemchardy3605 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Mind blowing it makes you wonder what it's all about great video thanks man

    • @Tar-Von
      @Tar-Von 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So.. Imagine if some bizarre alien species decided to observe us for decades.. One day, one comes directly to you and asks, "Your so-called human species, what's it all about?"
      What answer would you realistically give to that question? -- Or would you think that's probably an odd question?
      I'm just genuinely curious is all.

    • @us3rG
      @us3rG หลายเดือนก่อน

      IF aliens exist every answer would change but only humans give meaning to the known universe, without humans everything is meaningless ​@@Tar-Von

    • @Tar-Von
      @Tar-Von หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@us3rG
      Indeed, there's definitely some truth in that. The question seems a bit odd to me. It simply is what it is, or what it appears to be. -- If that makes sense.
      Also, I'm fairly certain that aliens do in fact exist. Whether or not they possess our concept of _intelligence,_ and have actually visited Earth? That's definitely questionable to say the least. -- A moot point, just a side interest. Still, interesting answer.👌

  • @7deepbreaths.sounds
    @7deepbreaths.sounds 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Absolutely OUSTANDING presentation! I thoroughly enjoyed viewing this documentary.

    • @michael.forkert
      @michael.forkert 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Documentary? Where?

  • @volcangoliatha4996
    @volcangoliatha4996 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great content keep us informed 😊

  • @naseradeli7207
    @naseradeli7207 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Exelent scientific research and show. Thank you

    • @peterclarke3020
      @peterclarke3020 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rather poorly presented.

  • @ardasahin500
    @ardasahin500 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I really like this video!! and this video made me get excited about astronomy again, so I want to become an astrophysicist when I grow up, but I'm not sure what I need to do or on what subject do I need to study when I get my diploma or how can I change the world in a good way but I really want to into this. Idk if I can be able to learn the language of this universe and imagine things that most people never does also I'm not that good at school like math and science stuffs but I like drawings, listening music, playing an instrument, thinking about sky asking questions and taking some notes and watching videos about math science and trying to understand the logic of the video also trying to learn computer science even if I don't understand so I have passion and I know I can, I think there are two ways for someone who is thinking just like me is you can learn all the stuff about it and you can do things that few people have accomplished or you could fail from school subjects and had a really bad situation and become a depressive person and people thinks you are weird, but I'm taking this risk and go forward as much as I can because I know that even If I cannot be able to learn those, it's not worthless as much as I Took some notes and share the information's and observations that I saw and witness before with the next generations of this world. Anyway in conclusion I have really long journey to go so lets focus our dreams and try our best's, because I don't think we have so much time this one was silly a bit yeah all I think about that have a nice day and Thank you to the team which produced this video!!

  • @chriswaudby1084
    @chriswaudby1084 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Very thought provoking video i love learning about the quantum world

    • @richardofoz2167
      @richardofoz2167 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thought provoking indeed. I keep thinking there must be a thousand things I'd rather be doing.

  • @Kratos_TM
    @Kratos_TM 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Watching this at 1.25x speed and it sounds great

  • @ricocapili6990
    @ricocapili6990 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    With the rate of astronomical and quantum discovery we humans are doing right now till the next century, it will be quite rare for us to alone after all. And one can truly say indeed we are special, no doubt about it..

  • @zinawilkins2364
    @zinawilkins2364 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cause I thank you for allowing us to see the beautiful of the mystery, the mysterious the powerful glory of having the trip created. Thank you God for letting me be able to see this and show us more. I love it. I love it I love it thank you god

  • @elfootman
    @elfootman 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I hate these AI generated video, makes no sense, filled with catchy phrases that don't make a coherent paragraph. Should be reported.

  • @michals1967
    @michals1967 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This video should be listened to at the 1.5 speed.

    • @TheWhitefisher
      @TheWhitefisher 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You have to change the playback speed in the settings, not the comments section

    • @wayneallen9192
      @wayneallen9192 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      0.5 Is better... Sounds he is pissed up at that speed lol

    • @christosmani
      @christosmani 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's how I always listen to all these "almost documentaries". Isaac Arthur has better deals with great insights, instead of copies of a copy they barely understand.

    • @ticklemeelbow
      @ticklemeelbow 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Definitely helped. 👍

    • @jonnyroxx7172
      @jonnyroxx7172 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nope. Almost every other documentary needs to be slowed down. People these days have almost no attention span anymore. Slow down and THINK.

  • @revert6417
    @revert6417 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Playing this at .5x is literally me after messy night out on the plonk.

  • @Earth2Ross
    @Earth2Ross 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Highly-complex concepts expertly-explained! TY

  • @richardrios6780
    @richardrios6780 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The universe in a finger nail !!!

  • @anomaliesandtherealdeal
    @anomaliesandtherealdeal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    After watching antman, i often wonder about the quarks and muons etc and what they experience. I wish we could see it.. One day maybe

  • @jthepickle7
    @jthepickle7 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Atoms are not absolutely necessary, but they do add texture to our experience.
    One, or 'oneness' makes far more sense than infinite variability.
    "The total number of minds in the universe is one." - Schrodinger

  • @digitalcommunity7621
    @digitalcommunity7621 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Informative and beneficial 🥰Geniouous presentation😘Brilliant video💖🥰👍

  • @-AndAllThatJazz..
    @-AndAllThatJazz.. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Truly different in the sense that something in here is actualy new information that haven´t seen before anywhere else .
    . . and with this master storytelling voice unfolding it .

    • @bama4467
      @bama4467 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You mean the AI voice?

    • @-AndAllThatJazz..
      @-AndAllThatJazz.. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@bama4467 Mean the one took place of all the zombies ?

    • @synisterfish
      @synisterfish 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The "master storytelling voice" which spasms nearly every single time it hits a word such as "atoms" or "questions" or "bosons" or "photons" ... or words which generally end in an "s" sound...
      -
      Are you a bot??
      This 'canned narrator' is actually garbage.

    • @peterclarke3020
      @peterclarke3020 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      An AI voice would not have had this speech impediment.
      He adds ‘zzzzz’ to the end of too many words !

    • @timetravellingbackwardsisp5337
      @timetravellingbackwardsisp5337 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@peterclarke3020 right, its a troll

  • @jasminejeanine2239
    @jasminejeanine2239 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    What if gravitons only come into existence when enough virtual particles hit each other?

    • @madhatter3492
      @madhatter3492 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      What if they don't exist because you are digging beyond the singularity, and it's all made up?

    • @TheJadeFist
      @TheJadeFist 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      or they don't exist because gravity as we perceive it is an emergent property of other systems rather than there being a single type of causal particle?

  • @nuranigeria2080
    @nuranigeria2080 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So the naked eyes are not enough!!
    Knowledge, Experience, Experiment and dedication 🥂 provide realities enough to believe even without the naked eyes.

  • @m.syassin5774
    @m.syassin5774 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The lecture is very good and useful. Thank you very much

  • @stefanschleps8758
    @stefanschleps8758 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The narration is excellent. Clear and well enunciated. The pronunciation and syntax is perfect. I love this channel. I learn as much in two hours as I did in three months at school. Thanks for sharing with us. 😊

    • @AndyWitmyer
      @AndyWitmyer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, bc it's AI haha

    • @ranjittyagi9354
      @ranjittyagi9354 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@AndyWitmyerno, that's not the reason though.

    • @johncalvin6124
      @johncalvin6124 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Except for the very annoying zzZZ sound at the end of every other sentence.

    • @ericvondell5157
      @ericvondell5157 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's perfect narration because the narrator Is AI!
      The Only Humans capable of Perfect Narration Are Morgan Freeman, James Earl Jones, and Patrick Stewart! 🙀😹💖

  • @dadsonworldwide3238
    @dadsonworldwide3238 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It shows us the micro is co dependant on the macro. We cant reduce away mankinds place.
    We have a great language model and tools to help speak and study in approximation about a paradoxical world around us.
    And this is ok .
    Its just how our ancestors predicted it to be. Its an amazing power almost mystical .

  • @markwrede8878
    @markwrede8878 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The layout of numbers suggests that the infinite resembles an ocean at all scales.

  • @telsat
    @telsat 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very interesting and informative thank you

  • @kenhiett5266
    @kenhiett5266 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I don't know what's up with this guys voice, but it sounds intentional. I think that's why it bothers me to point I have to quit watching.

    • @codynix8213
      @codynix8213 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Me too. It's obnoxious. I think it's a computer voice.

  • @michaelpenklis7580
    @michaelpenklis7580 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The theory of everything is putting a good documentary together.

  • @larrysorenson4789
    @larrysorenson4789 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And last one: to measure and pinpoint the location of things in space, we must identify a universal starting point.

  • @KF-bj3ce
    @KF-bj3ce 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    One can not stop to wonder at this magnificent universe.

    • @SeanSchwifty
      @SeanSchwifty 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Why not’th? 😮

    • @u2ooberboober
      @u2ooberboober 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I can: bills to pay, stressed out at work. hot outside… commercials popping up while trying to watch this video…!

    • @Sctn187
      @Sctn187 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@u2ooberbooberespecially because ai is playfully slow speaking

    • @jackdawson5273
      @jackdawson5273 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      mea, eat when ya hungry, sleep when ya tired... aint no mystery. lol omgg peoples, whys yous trys finds shyt out that will never matter?

    • @Sctn187
      @Sctn187 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jackdawson5273 I think you're asking why people want to know about things that will never matter I think you mean thinks that won't actually effect us. Well that's what makes humans so amazing our curiosity and willingness to learn. They do matter in the sense that we would like to understand what's makes the universe tick, what's out there, why and how we're here.

  • @user-es2ju9np9s
    @user-es2ju9np9s 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Thank you to the team which produced this great work! This is an exceptional presentation and it made me question why my school physics lessons were so dull almost 65 years ago. Had those lessons been presented in this engaging and interesting manner, I may well have chosen the study of physics as my lifetime pathway. I really enjoyed this presentation.

    • @ranjittyagi9354
      @ranjittyagi9354 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Schools tend to rush and don't care enough. A fact I see across the world, definitely not relegated to any particular nation. Thank you!😊

    • @pauly362
      @pauly362 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I wouldn't want children to be taught by monotone AI systems. Have you not noticed the fake volume change but constant speed of word delivery?
      It is very well presented as in documented and laid out but the narration should have been read by an actual person...in my opinion.

    • @ranjittyagi9354
      @ranjittyagi9354 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@pauly362 I hate AI.

    • @user-es2ju9np9s
      @user-es2ju9np9s 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@pauly362 In an ideal world and all that... I ignored all of the things that did not add to the material being presented. This would include inflection, monotony, volume changes, inhuman voice &c. These attributes did not aid the clarity of vision behind the presentation. I could have requested that some world-famous cosmologist come to my home and present the materials personally. We have to be realistic and accept that the material was very well presented and introduced a complex subject to a wide audience. This form of presentation is one of the saving graces of the internet.

    • @xXxTeenSplayer
      @xXxTeenSplayer 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is actually no science education in this video, it's just some random AI generated factoids. I don't think you would have made it as a physicist...

  • @user-yl5sq1eb4r
    @user-yl5sq1eb4r 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I always thought that you can go down or up to incomprehensible scales. Think of a universe that is incomprensibly small. Could our universe be inside of an incomprehensibly huge atom? Could each of the atoms in our universe contain impossibly small universes?

  • @chuckgriffin3292
    @chuckgriffin3292 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video which does a good job of explaining a very complex topic.

  • @paxwallace8324
    @paxwallace8324 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    What can be "seen" is dependent on the wavelength of light so it's (by definition) an absurdity to ask what "anything" smaller than the Wavelength of visible light would look like.

  • @larrygraham3377
    @larrygraham3377 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    This is a great video. Really learned a lot. Thank you for breaking everything down to a level that even a simple minded person like me could understand. 🤔🤔🤔

    • @timetravellingbackwardsisp5337
      @timetravellingbackwardsisp5337 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You cant be simple minded, youre commenting here on YT ^^

    • @Vile_Entity_3545
      @Vile_Entity_3545 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are far from simple minded. The majority of people can’t think at all.
      Did you know that 50% of the population can not imagine?
      What I’m getting at is when you walk down the road, do you think of stuff, like for instance what it would be like to be a millionaire, or what you are going to have for dinner, or you can’t wait to see your parents next week, or dreaming of that new car you are saving up for?
      50% of people are blank totally.
      It shocked me when a top psychologist in a video I watched about 6 months ago said it.
      I thought it can’t be true and he did say it is just normal for them and it isn’t a bad thing either. Obviously they do not know themselves probably that people like us actually think, because they would not be able to comprehend that.
      Scary thought when you think about it.

    • @veraivanova4664
      @veraivanova4664 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Vile_Entity_3545As someone with aphantasia I laughed very hard at this comment

  • @junestorm
    @junestorm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Brilliant video!

  • @DownhillAllTheWay
    @DownhillAllTheWay 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm glad he said that the Schrodinger's cat experiment doesn't reflect reality. I kind-of get what is being illustrated by it, but the reality is that at any moment in time, the cat is either dead or alive - we simply don't know which - but it makes no intuitive sense to say it is both dead and alive at the same time. Maybe this makes more sense in the realm of sub-stomic particles, but a cat in a box is is a poor illustration.

  • @rodbarker1017
    @rodbarker1017 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    An absolutely amazing piece of work. The somewhat ponderous delivery is very deliberate as for most it is talking about concepts way outside the norm. A bit like Feynmans comment on Quantem mechanics. If you think you can grasp all this at 140 wpm you clearly don't and it is just ear and eye candy. Why in God's name isn't it taught like this.
    I am a retired atmospheric research physiatrist and saying this is a masterpiece

    • @AndyWitmyer
      @AndyWitmyer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's deliberate sounding bc it's an AI voice-over

    • @parsandstripes9445
      @parsandstripes9445 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Reinforce AI takeover.

  • @PlanetXMysteries-pj9nm
    @PlanetXMysteries-pj9nm 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    All your videos are great! One thing I’ve always wanted to do is to travel in outer space. Sadly it’s extremely unlikely to happen but I can dream

  • @m.d.classes3889
    @m.d.classes3889 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Easiest intelligible explanation for all level of understanding people.

  • @abooswalehmosafeer173
    @abooswalehmosafeer173 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Many thanks for really trying to make this simple.I have to admit though I still find some of it really beyound my grasp.But I will persevere because Repetition helps to accommodate some concepts.But again Thanks speed of lights.

  • @wttw4942
    @wttw4942 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I'm wondering how two entangled particles might behave if they are smashed together inside a particle accelerator.

    • @Noqtis
      @Noqtis 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they will have sex and create a new particle obviously, how do you thought new particles are made?

    • @jabroski69
      @jabroski69 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually that would be dangerous if that were to happen it would affect the very fabric of our universe and make our reality more like the movie Idiocracy where we elect famous people into office and then the males would chop their dicks off and get on hormones to appear more womanly and then argue that just bc their chromosomes are male and they don't menstruate or have babies that they are in fact a woman and want to use the women's bathroom, stupid shit like that.

    • @jthepickle7
      @jthepickle7 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You pose a question that reminds me of marriage!

    • @garychaney5484
      @garychaney5484 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Many a quickie divorce! This coming from a carpenters point of view

    • @idegteke
      @idegteke 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      What we perceive as 2 entangled particles is, actually, 2 separate spatial appearance of a single (something). Coming up with such a childish idea that they are “entangled” and picturing a magical worm hole between them (and even hoping to use that for interstellar travel) shows that the mainstream science has very little potential to get results - I’m just writing this down for the record. Some of you might see if I was right in some decades.

  • @rwarren58
    @rwarren58 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    That can't be a human narrator.

    • @jennodine
      @jennodine 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      It’s not and you’re experiencing a phenomenon called Uncanny Valley.

    • @guido764
      @guido764 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Thank you it's driving me nuts. Distracting.

    • @jennodine
      @jennodine 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@guido764 lol same

    • @SteedRuckus
      @SteedRuckus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Play it at 1.25x speed, thank me later.

    • @MugiwaraTed
      @MugiwaraTed 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ⁠@@SteedRuckusjeez is the video intentionally slowed down so they can get more watch time?

  • @richardremillard4451
    @richardremillard4451 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video. Thank you

  • @miromihaljinec9728
    @miromihaljinec9728 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great work! Thanks !

  • @Paducah_Guy
    @Paducah_Guy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    ARE WE STILL QUANTUM ENTANGLED WITH OUR LOVED ONES AFTER DEATH...?

    • @user-ki2cl9xe8z
      @user-ki2cl9xe8z 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's GROOVE! I hope you're right!

  • @peterhart1966
    @peterhart1966 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Several years ago, at least fifteen to twenty years, I asked what if we could magnify so, so much that we could see behind the cracks to the other side?

    • @OmniMale
      @OmniMale 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What cracks?

    • @nomofomo3995
      @nomofomo3995 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thus, cern was born.

  • @amirthakateasan2957
    @amirthakateasan2957 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The story teller voice and the cap between the words has charmed us, is nothing like anything before, thanks a lot gentleman....a.v.pillai, chennai

  • @chousaru
    @chousaru 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Beautiful closing statement. Inspiring,

  • @deeestuary
    @deeestuary 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    'Infinitely Small' is impossible.

    • @gisli12
      @gisli12 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Infinity is 404 afk, in the math realm often in close proximity theoretically to a singularity, i am most sertainly just spewing nonsens. I just had to comment cuz of mind altering substances week makes me think im dumb but the creativeness of my thoughts expands and thinking becomes fun

    • @OmniMale
      @OmniMale 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How so?

    • @jacob.tudragens
      @jacob.tudragens 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @OmniMale
      Theoretically, expansion can be infinite. Meaning, of course, that it goes on forever.
      While expansion can be infinite, shrinking can only go so small!
      At some point, the smallness is, at least effectively, zero!

    • @OmniMale
      @OmniMale 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jacob.tudragens but what does zero look like?

    • @jacob.tudragens
      @jacob.tudragens 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@OmniMale
      That's the point!
      Describe nothing. I'll wait...
      For a thing can be a thing, you have to be able to describe it.
      Zero is nothing. No thing!

  • @NondescriptMammal
    @NondescriptMammal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Something "infinitely small" wouldn't "look like" anything.

    • @OmniMale
      @OmniMale 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How do you know?

    • @NondescriptMammal
      @NondescriptMammal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@OmniMale Well, consider the term "infinitely small". There are particles that we are aware of that are extremely small, but not "infinitely small", and even these particles are too small to see optically, such that they can't rightly be described as "looking like" anything, since they are too small to even reflect light waves back to our eyes, even under the most powerful optical magnification device.
      Beyond that, the term "infinitely small" is itself arguably a contradiction in terms... to describe something as small inherently implies that it has a finite size, even if that size is unknown. Therefore it cannot be "infinitely small" unless we consider that it has no dimensions at all, like a mathematical point... which is to say, it is nonexistent. Tell me, how can something that is so small that it occupies zero space, be looked at? If you can't look at it, it can't really "look like" anything, can it?

  • @ninner196
    @ninner196 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well definitely true, the more we think we know the more we realize we just don’t know and hence “theories “

  • @juliew393
    @juliew393 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent video. Thanks!

  • @Tomichika
    @Tomichika 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    These are so great. I wish there wasnt the accent on words endings. I find it so disruptive while falling asleep. It souns like the narrator is exhaling at the end of every sentene ending word.

    • @Just.A.T-Rex
      @Just.A.T-Rex 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s ai voice, I sped it up just a bit and it helped

    • @michaelbryant4703
      @michaelbryant4703 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow...

    • @ozymandiasultor9480
      @ozymandiasultor9480 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is not made to make you asleep.

    • @chriswaudby1084
      @chriswaudby1084 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree 😊

  • @ozymandiasultor9480
    @ozymandiasultor9480 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    OK, a relatively ordinary documentary about quantum mechanics with a voice that is slightly annoying.

    • @cousinivoryciv1309
      @cousinivoryciv1309 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      All the space science channels are using AI voice is now, play it at 1.25 speed to be less annoying but yeah I agree

    • @ozymandiasultor9480
      @ozymandiasultor9480 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cousinivoryciv1309 I know, but some are slightly better than other AI voices... In any case, I will try that trick, thanx.

    • @TheWhitefisher
      @TheWhitefisher 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ozymandiasultor9480 This AI is running a little slower than in other documentaries. It has some unique inflections on the end of plural words. It's grown on me. I just want to say that this channel does a good job expanding a layperson's understanding and doesn't spend time on psuedoscience, except for to mention and discredit it.
      The thing about AI voicing is "you get what you pay for". Do you want quality content, or do you want studio production? You don't seem to get both in this economy. The original TH-cam was made by volunteers using microphones on their earbuds, making zero income. That was quality content, and it cost nothing and produced nothing.
      Personally, I'm happy to listen to an odd inflection. If you focus on comparing this channel to space-specific channels, it probably appears differently. This is a generalised science-dissemination channel.

  • @Meme_city_111
    @Meme_city_111 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One of the best video u ever made mann....i love this video...❤luv from Pakistan

  • @dathyr1
    @dathyr1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You talk about the very small in this video. What if we were the atom to something much more bigger than our universe. Kind of makes me think how many levels are there and what if we were a small part of something much larger.
    But that is something for the SciFi guys to come up with a movie about.

  • @kendallkirkham238
    @kendallkirkham238 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    TH-cam did everything it could to ruin this.

    • @ozymandiasultor9480
      @ozymandiasultor9480 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      TH-cam did everything to ruin this very ordinary documentary that says nothing new about quantum mechanics? You think youtube cares so much about quantum mechanics, or has some opposing theory to those that were mentioned?

    • @cousinivoryciv1309
      @cousinivoryciv1309 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What exactly did TH-cam do?

    • @Gesus_23
      @Gesus_23 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bullshit, it’s a crap video anyway

    • @davidharvey3743
      @davidharvey3743 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How?

    • @tomhartl6330
      @tomhartl6330 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Are you referring to the incessant ads?

  • @educatedmanholecoverbyrich8890
    @educatedmanholecoverbyrich8890 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very good for the beginner, and the bright child.

  • @zack_120
    @zack_120 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Textbook material! 👍 The first part on standard model is beautifally described with new informarion to learn (to me). But the quantum part it's better to wait for the conclusion from the strange quantum theories in order to save time.
    50:05- how to prove that quarks, and electrons, are fundamental particles being indivisible?

    • @STARDRIVE
      @STARDRIVE 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That´s a good question. The elements were thought to be elementary too..

  • @michaeld.coulombesr.583
    @michaeld.coulombesr.583 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I, as one, thought it was a excellent video, very interesting and well written. Thank you very much. Michael said that, bye for now my friend.

  • @balasubr2252
    @balasubr2252 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We are the discerning instrument nature has evolved to unify, understand and utilize.

  • @zinawilkins2364
    @zinawilkins2364 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    God you're so powerful I love you beautiful works

  • @jasonstewart2153
    @jasonstewart2153 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the free Education 🎉

  • @scottchapman5410
    @scottchapman5410 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice and relaxing visuals as well

  • @MyKukutis
    @MyKukutis 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My respect to the speaker, nice work, thank You

  • @JohnSmith-ts2od
    @JohnSmith-ts2od 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Appreciate the effort in making this video, but I feel it may be somewhat outdated and not fully reflective of our current understanding of atomic structure. It's often stated that an atom is mostly 'empty space,' but this isn't entirely accurate. Quantum physics shows us that the space inside an atom is filled with electric, magnetic, and quantum fields. The electrons aren't located at fixed points but exist as a probability cloud, where they could potentially be at any given moment. Thus, while it's true that the physical components like the nucleus and electrons occupy a relatively small portion of the atom, the remaining space is far from being empty. It's actually filled with these fields, and that's a critical distinction. I encourage more updated research and information in your future content to ensure viewers are getting the most accurate scientific information. Keep striving for accuracy!

  • @malectric
    @malectric 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It seems to me that Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle should and does apply at any scale. To know the position of anything, big or small you have to "freeze" its position relative to the measurement apparatus. But if you do that, it has zero motion at that instant and therefore no momentum. So you cannot in principle know both at the same instant. It seems to me that the principle puts a limit on measurement - stop time and you can know one thing to at least the tiniest fraction of time allowable/measureable or allow time to continue and you know the other (momentum) but the position is no longer exact. Why should this not apply to everything?

    • @ericray7173
      @ericray7173 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because when you zoom out - those fuzzy probability clouds become more and more predictable due to the fact that the probability that the particles will be outside of an area of, say, a square inch, although not zero, is nearly impossible.

  • @MssssppSoldier
    @MssssppSoldier 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love how slow the narrator speaks on such a complex subject

    • @ralphmaughan7951
      @ralphmaughan7951 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think the narration is done by a machine vocalizing a script.

  • @Vile_Entity_3545
    @Vile_Entity_3545 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When a glass bottle breaks that is higher entropy than the lower entropy it was before, so thinking about how atoms can form molecules seems to be the reverse going from high entropy back to lower entropy.
    Isn’t that meant to be nearly impossible?
    Atoms do this on such a large scale, that they must either break down to their singular form many times more to fit into that cycle….or we are actually seeing an infinite universe at work and the heat death model of the universe is totally wrong.